DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation of Streamflow Records in Rogue River Basin, Oregon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation of Streamflow Records in Rogue River Basin, Oregon GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 187 \ EVALUATION OF STREAMFLOW RECORDS IN ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OREGON B!y Donald Rkhaideon UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 187 EVALUATION OF STREAMFLOW RECORDS IN ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OREGON By Donald Richardson Washington, D. C., 1952 Free on application to the Geological Surrey, Washington 25, D. C. ' CONTENTS Page Page Abstract................................. 1 Syllabus of gaging-stations records--Con. Introduction............................. 1 Gaging-station records-Continued Purpose and Scope...................... 1 Rogue River Continued Acknowledgments........................ 1 Little Butte Creek at Lake Creek... 25 Physical features- of the basin........... 2 Little Butte Creek above Eagle Utilization of water in the basin........ 2 Point............................ 25 Water resources data for Rogue River basin 5 Little Butte Creek near Eagle Streamflow records ..................... 5 Point............................ 25 Storage reservoirs..................... 6 Little Butte Creek below Eagle Adequacy of data....................... 6 Point............................ 26 Syllabus of gaging-station records....... 13 Emigrant Creek (head of Bear Creek) Explanation of data .................... 13 near Ashland..................... 27 Gaging-station records................. 13 Emigrant Creek below Walker Creek, Rogue River above Bybee Creek........ 13 near Ashland..................... 28 Rogue River above Prospect........... 13 Nell Creek near Ashland.......... 28 Rogue River at Prospect.............. 14 Nell Creek (near mouth) near Mill Creek near Prospect........... 14 Ashland........................ 28 Rogue River below Prospect........... 14 Bear Creek above Ashland Creek, at Rogue River below Prospect power Ashland.......................... 29 plant no. 1 ....................... 15 West Pork Ashland Creek (head of South Pork Rogue River above Imnaha Ashland Creek) near Ashland.... 29 Creek, near Prospect............. 15 East Pork Ashland Creek near Imnaha Creek near Prospect....... 15 Ashland...................... 29 South Pork Rogue River near Prospect 15 Ashland Creek at Ashland......... 29 Middle Fork Rogue River near Bear Creek near Ashland............ 30 Prospect....................... 16 Wagner Creek near TaJ.ent......... 30 Red Blanket Creek near Prosepct 16 Bear Creek at (Talent............... 30 Rogue River below South Pork Ro'gue Bear Creek below Phoenix Canal, River, near Prospect............... 16 near Talent...................... 31 Willow Creek (head of Big Butte Bear Creek at Medford.............. 31 Creek) near Butte Palls.......... 17 Bear Creek near Central Point...... 31 Big Butte Springs near Butte Palls 17 Rogue River at Raygold, near Central Rancheria Creek: Point...... ......................... 32 Pourbit Creek near Butte Palls. 17 Evans Creek above West Pork at Rancheria Creek near Butte Palls. 18 Meadow Bridge (near Bybee Springs) 32 South Pork Big Butte Creek (contin­ Evans Creek at Bybee Springs, near uation of Willow Creek) near Rogue River...................... 33 Butte Palls.................... 18 Evans Creek at Wimer............... 33 South Pork Big Butte Creek at Pleasant Creek near Rogue River.. 34 Butte Palls...................... 18 Rogue River at Grants Pass........... 34 North Pork Big Butte Creek near Applegate River near Copper........ 35 Butte Palls.................... 19 Applegate River near Ruch (Buncom). 36 Big Butte Creek below Butte Palls.. 19 Little Applegate River near Big Butte Creek near McLeod........ 19 Talent......................... 37 Elk Creek near Trail............... 20 Little Applegate River near Rogue River near Trail............... 20 Buncom......................... 37 Rogue River at Dodge Bridge, near West Pork Little Applegate River Eagle Point........................ 21 _near Buncom.................. 37 South Pork Little Butte Creek (head Little Applegate River near Ruch. 38 of Little Butte Creek) at Big Applegate River near Applegate..... 38 Elk ranger station............. 22 Thompson Creek near Applegate.... 38 Big Draw Creek near Deadwood..... 22 Williams Creek: Daley Creek near Lake Creek.... 22 East Pork Williams Creek near Dead Indian Creek near Lilyglen.. 22 Williams..................... 39 South Pork Little Butte Creek near West Pork Williams Creek near Lake Creek....'................... 22 Williams..................... 40 South Pork Little Butte Creek (near Hungers Creek near Williams.. 40 mouth) near take Creek........... 23 Powell Creek near Williams..... 40 North Pork Little Butte Creek at Applegate River at Murphy.......... 40 Pish Lake, near Lake Creek..... 23 Applegate River near Wilderville... 42 North Pork Little Butte Creek near Slate Creek at Wonder............ 42 Lake Creek..................... 23 Jumpoff Joe Creek near Merlin...... 42 North Pork Little Butte Creek Louse Creek near Grants ^ass..... 43 above Rogue River Valley Canal Rogue River near Galice.....'......... 43 intake, near Lake Creek........ 24 III IV Page Page Syllabus of gaging-stations records--Con. Syllabus of gaging-stations records--Con, Gaging-station.records--Continued Gaging-station records--Continued Rogue River--Continued Rogue River Continued Grave Creek at Pease Bridge, near East Fork Illinois River Continued Placer........................... 43 Althouse Creek near Kerby........ 45 Grave Creek near Placer............ 43 Sucker Creek: East Pork Illinois River (head of Grayback Creek near Holland.. 45 Illinois River) near Takilma..... 44 Sucker Creek near Holland......' 46 Loag Gulch at Basye 'Ranch, near West Pork Illinois River near Takilma........................ 45 0'Brien........................ 46 East Pork Illinois River below Wood Creek near O'Brien........ 46 Esterly middle canal, near Rough and Ready Creek near Takilma.......................... 45 O'Brien...................... 47 Althouse Creek near Holland...... 45 Illinois River at Kerby............ 47 Deer Creek near Dryden........... 48 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Map showing irrigated areas in Rogue River basin................................. 4 2. Map showing location and duration of streamflow records......................... 7 Plate 1. Map showing location of gaging stations In the Rogue River basin ...........In pocket TABLES Page Table 1. Municipal water supplies and wasteways in Rogue River basin....................... 3 2. Index of streamflow records in Rogue River basin................................. 8 3. Storage reservoirs in Rogue River basin........................................... 9 4. Streamflow records in relation to natural yield.................................. 10 5. Diversions in Rogue River basin, above Rogue River near Trail..................... 21 6. Diversions in Little Butte Creek basin, above North Fork Little Butte Creek above Rogue River Valley canal intake................................................. 24 7. Diversions in Little Butte Creek basin, above Little Butte Creek above Eagle Point 26 8. Diversions in Evans1 Creek basin, above Evans Creek at Wimer....................... 34 9. Diversions in Rogue River basin, above Rogue River at Grants Pass................. 36 10. Diversions in Applegate River basin,above Applegate River near Applegate.......... 39 11. Diversions in Thompson Creek basin, above Thompson Creek near Applegate........... 39 12. Diversions in Applegate River basin, above Applegate River at Murphy.............. 41 13. Diversions in Rogue River basin, above Illinois River at Kerby.................... 47 EVALUATION OF STREAMFLOW RECORDS IN ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OREGON ABSTRACT charge at that particular point. In a basin where natural runoff prevails, these records This report presents data which are, in gen­ depict the surface-water yield of the basin at eral, supplementary to those the surface-water that point. Such records are of great value investigations made in the past by the U. S. to the hydrologist or designing engineer, as Geological Survey. Those have been essentially they are a direct measure of the yield of the investigations of the operation of the many drainage basin. When upstream water use di­ gaging stations on the Rogue River and tribu­ verts and depletes the water supply, the dis­ taries. charge records no longer serve as a measure of the yield of the basin unless appropriate The data presented were obtained from a de­ adjustments are made. If the point of proposed tailed field investigation of the various diversion or future use is remote from the gag­ factors resulting from man-mad* structures ing station, it is even more important to have that influence the quantity or regimen of the complete knowledge of these factors. flow at the gaging stations. These factors include diversions from the stream, bypass The primary purpose of this report is to channels carrying water around the gaging sta­ evaluate each streamflow record in terms of the tions, return flow from irrigation'or other factors that influence or alter the flow of the projects, storage and release of flood waters, Yakima River and tributaries at the gaging sta­ and other similar factors. Where feasible, tion locations. Such factors include diversions, the location, size, effect upon the streamflow, bypass channels carrying water around the gaging periods of use, method of operation,, and simi­ stations, consumptive use, regulation by storage, lar information are given. The information is and other factors that alter the natural regimen
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rogue River Watershed Council Bear Creek Working Group Monday, August 10, 2015 8:30 Am - 10:30 Am Conference Room 151, Lausmann Annex, City of Medford
    Rogue River Watershed Council Bear Creek Working Group Monday, August 10, 2015 8:30 am - 10:30 am Conference Room 151, Lausmann Annex, City of Medford MEETING MINUTES In attendance: Steve Mason, John Ward, Robert Coffan, Lori Tella, Natasche O’Brien Legg, Bob Jones, Ray Tharp, Eric Dittmer, Louise Shawkat, Ed Olson, Shane Jimerfield, Amie Martin Call to order: 8:40am by Working Group Chair, Steve Mason Rogue River Watershed Council Update Two new program managers have been hired: Donna Chickering and Sarah Sauter. Brian Barr has been busy out at Wimer and Fielder dams on Evans Creek. Removal of Wimer dam was completed and crews mobilized to Fielder dam downstream. Low flows in Evans Creek caused turbidity issues during the removal. The dams should be completely out by the end of August. Proposal from Lori Tella and Jennie Morgan As part of the merger, most of Bear Creek Watershed Council’s unrestricted funds moved into a “dedicated” fund, which restricts that money for use in the Bear Creek watershed. Bear Creek Watershed Education Partners (BCWEP) has historically run the Kids and Creeks event, with the Bear Creek Watershed Council as the major partner. The events offers an opportunity for people to learn about the Bear Creek watershed, contributing factors to water pollution, and see spawning salmon. The Rogue River Watershed Council (RRWC) would like to see the event continue, but BCWEP lost its funding for this year, so the RRWC would have to take the lead. Requested from the working group is approval to use a small portion of Bear Creek dedicated funds to help support the event.
    [Show full text]
  • Timing of In-Water Work to Protect Fish and Wildlife Resources
    OREGON GUIDELINES FOR TIMING OF IN-WATER WORK TO PROTECT FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES June, 2008 Purpose of Guidelines - The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, (ODFW), “The guidelines are to assist under its authority to manage Oregon’s fish and wildlife resources has updated the following guidelines for timing of in-water work. The guidelines are to assist the the public in minimizing public in minimizing potential impacts to important fish, wildlife and habitat potential impacts...”. resources. Developing the Guidelines - The guidelines are based on ODFW district fish “The guidelines are based biologists’ recommendations. Primary considerations were given to important fish species including anadromous and other game fish and threatened, endangered, or on ODFW district fish sensitive species (coded list of species included in the guidelines). Time periods were biologists’ established to avoid the vulnerable life stages of these fish including migration, recommendations”. spawning and rearing. The preferred work period applies to the listed streams, unlisted upstream tributaries, and associated reservoirs and lakes. Using the Guidelines - These guidelines provide the public a way of planning in-water “These guidelines provide work during periods of time that would have the least impact on important fish, wildlife, and habitat resources. ODFW will use the guidelines as a basis for the public a way of planning commenting on planning and regulatory processes. There are some circumstances where in-water work during it may be appropriate to perform in-water work outside of the preferred work period periods of time that would indicated in the guidelines. ODFW, on a project by project basis, may consider variations in climate, location, and category of work that would allow more specific have the least impact on in-water work timing recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Applegate Hydrology Report
    Little Applegate Watershed Hydrology Report Michael Zan * Hydrologist April 1995 Little Applegate Watershed Analysis Hydrology Report SECTION 1 LITTLE APPLEGATE RIVER HYDROLOGY Mean Monthly Flows: Except for some data collected from May through October 1913, and from June through October 1994. there is no known flow data for the Little Applegate River or its tributaries. With this in mind it was necessary to construct a hydrograph displaying mean monthly flows by utilizing records from nearby stations that have been published in USGS Surface Water Records and Open-File Reports. In constructing a hydrograph, a short discussion of low flows is first in order. Since low streamflows have been identified as a key question pertaining to the larger issues of water quantity/quality and fish populations, the greatest need is to gain a reasonable estimate of seasonal low flows to help quantify the impacts of water withdrawals on instream beneficial uses. With this in mind, extreme caution must be used when extrapolating data from gaged to ungaged watersheds. This is particularly important in determining low-flow characteristics (Riggs 1972, Gallino 1994 personal communications). The principle terrestrial influence on low flow is geology and the primary meteorological influence is precipitation. Neither have been adequately used to describe effects on low flow using an index so that estimation of low flow characteristics of sites without discharge measurements has met with limited success. Exceptions are on streams in a region with homogeneous geology, topography, and climate, in which it should be possible to define a range of flow per square mile for a given recurrence interval.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Rogue Watershed Assessment
    Upper Rogue Watershed Assessment Chapter 2 Hydrology . TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 HYDROLOGY ............................................................................................................................... 1 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 2.2 Water Use .......................................................................................................................1 2.3 Streamflow Data ............................................................................................................2 2.4 Peak Discharge ..............................................................................................................5 2.4.1 Trail Creek Subwatershed .....................................................................................5 2.4.2 Elk Creek Subwatershed .......................................................................................9 2.4.3 Upper Rogue River Subwatershed......................................................................12 2.4.4 South Fork Subwatershed...................................................................................16 2.4.5 Big Butte Creek Subwatershed ...........................................................................18 2.4.6 Lost Creek Lake Subwatershed ..........................................................................22 2.4.7 Shady Cove Subwatershed..................................................................................23 2.5 Summary ......................................................................................................................25
    [Show full text]
  • South Fork of Little Butte Creek Area Naming Proposals
    South Fork of Little Butte Creek Area Naming Proposals Presented by Dr. Alice G. Knotts INTRODUCTION We begin by thanking the Oregon Geographic Names Board for its careful work exhibited and accomplished in recent years for naming geographical features in the State of Oregon. We have identified some physical features in the area of the South Fork of Little Butte Creek located in Jackson County and put forth name suggestions and proposals. We believe that most of them are located on public lands of the U.S. Forest Service or the BLM, but the Knotts Cliff is on private land. 1 Naming Proposals for the South Fork of Little Butte Creek Area Identified in geographic order of approach from Medford, the road up the South Fork of Little Butte Creek and the Soda Springs trail 1009 that follows upstream Dead Indian Creek that is proposed to be named Latgawa Creek. 1. Hole-in-the-Rock Name a rock arch located on top of a hill NW of Poole Hill. Hole-in-the-Rock has been recorded on a BLM map but not with GNIS. 2. Pilgrim Cave Name a rock shelf with ancient campfire smoked walls. A shelter for travelers for thousands of years. 3. Knotts Bluff Name a cliff that defines the northern side of a canyon through which runs the S. Fork of Little Butte Creek. 4. Ross Point Name a prominent point on Knotts Cliff above the cave. 5. Latgawa Pinnacles Name a group of rocky pinnacles located near Camp Latgawa. 6. Marjorie Falls Name a water slide on Latgawa Creek upstream from the soda springs.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Management and Conservation Plan March 2009
    Water Management and Conservation Plan March 2009 Water Management and Conservation Plan March 2009 CVO\082060036 Contents Section Page 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................1-1 Overview.....................................................................................................................1-1 Plan Organization ......................................................................................................1-3 Affected Local Governments....................................................................................1-3 Plan Update Schedule ...............................................................................................1-4 2 Water Supplier Description .............................................................................................2-1 Source ..........................................................................................................................2-1 Interconnections with Other Systems .....................................................................2-1 Intergovernmental Agreements...............................................................................2-2 Service Area Description...........................................................................................2-2 System Description ....................................................................................................2-5 Records of Water Use ................................................................................................2-8
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary for the Pacific Northwest Recreation Resource Advisory Committee
    Executive Summary for the Pacific Northwest Recreation Resource Advisory Committee Site: Illinois River Scenic Area Site Type: HIRA Proposed Action: New Fees Recommended Fees: Area Fee: Begin charging $5.00 per vehicle per day Site Description - The Illinois River Scenic Area is a highly used area within the nationally designated Illinois Wild and Scenic River corridor located on the Rogue River- Siskiyou National Forest, Wild Rivers Ranger District. The area is about 15 miles south of Grants Pass and within a 1 to 2 hour drive from the Rogue River Valley and Medford- Metropolitan area. The approximate 2,970 acre area is nestled in an old growth forest setting. The area has four campgrounds, five picnic areas, two scenic overlooks and interpretive sites, one historic site, five trailheads, four developed parking areas with swimming and rafting opportunities, and one private commercial lodge. The area is the gateway to the east side of the Kalmiopsis Wilderness and the Wild Section of the Illinois W&S River. The unique mix of recreation opportunities is significant to southern Oregon. Visits to the scenic area currently exceed 180,000 people per season. Fee Assessment - Recent capital investments of 1.2 million dollars in road and parking improvements, new picnic tables, shelters, trails, and campgrounds have been built to help serve the public, improve visitor safety and prevent resource damage. Subsequently, fees are needed to provide law enforcement presence, operation and maintenance. The recommended fees are based on 1) a Market Value analysis, 2) the Regional Campground Pricing rating, and 3) the Recreation Facility Analysis process.
    [Show full text]
  • United States of America 123 Ferc ¶ 62021
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 123 FERC ¶ 62,021 FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION PacifiCorp Project No. 2630-004 ORDER ISSUING NEW LICENSE (April 8, 2008) INTRODUCTION 1. On June 27, 2003, PacifiCorp filed an application for a new license pursuant to sections 4(e) and 15 of the Federal Power Act (FPA),1 to continue operation and maintenance of the Prospect Nos. 1, 2, and 4 Hydroelectric Project No. 2630. The project’s authorized capacity being licensed is 41.56 megawatts (MW). The project is located on the Rogue River, Middle Fork Rogue River, and Red Blanket Creek in Jackson County, Oregon.2 The project does not occupy federal lands. 2. On October 26, 2006, PacifiCorp filed a Settlement Agreement (settlement) signed by it and the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (Oregon DFW) that addresses certain resident trout issues related to this relicense proceeding, including ramping rate effects and large woody debris management. 3. As discussed below, I am issuing a new license for the project. The license incorporates most of the settlement’s provisions. 1 16 U.S.C. §§ 797(e) and 808 (2000). 2 The project is part of PacifiCorp’s interconnected system that transmits power across state lines for public utility purposes. The project was constructed in different segments, the first of which was completed in 1911 (Prospect No. 1) and the last in 1944 (Prospect No. 4). Because the project (1) is located on a body of water over which Congress has Commerce Clause jurisdiction, (2) affects interstate commerce through its connection to an interstate power grid, and (3) has had significant post-1935 construction, it is required to be licensed pursuant to section 23(b)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rogue River 3, 4 and 5 Day Trips Riverside Beach Camping
    The Rogue River 3, 4 and 5 day trips riverside beach camping The Rogue River is born near Crater Lake in the Cascade mountain range, then flows southwest to its meeting with the Pacific ocean near the town of Gold Beach. We float the most spectacular 38 miles of the river, where it cuts through the rugged coastal mountains of southern Oregon, not far from the town of Grants Pass. When congress first passed legislation to protect America’s wild rivers, the Rogue was among the first to receive protection. And no wonder. The Rogue River canyon is an enchanting blend of lush forests, fern grottos, beautiful sandy beaches, sparkling waterfalls, lovely side streams, and cool clear swimming holes. It’s wild country and wildlife is everywhere: perhaps more wildlife than you’re likely to see on a river trip anywhere outside Alaska. The Rogue’s rapids are mostly class III in difficulty: exciting and challenging, but not too threatening for our guests who choose to try their hand at inflatable kayaks or our row-yourself rafts. (Rapids are rated I through VI. Class I indicates the smallest possible rapid, while VI indicates steep, turbulent, highly dangerous rapids and waterfalls.) The Rogue is a river for all seasons. Summer trips promise hot, sunny weather and warm water for swimming. Spring trips are sensational, with multitudes of wildflowers. Fall trips reveal gorgeous colors, warm days and cool crisp evenings. And the whitewater is exciting, any time of year. A great family trip, the Rogue is one of our nation’s finest river journeys.
    [Show full text]
  • Temperatures Cool by Shading the Stream from Solar Radiation. These
    Chapter 3 Affected Environment Conde Shell temperatures cool by shading the stream from solar radiation. These trees and shrubs also contribute nutrients to the system as coarse organic material that is crucial to the macroinvertebrate communities that support fish and other aquatic organisms. Large wood has been identified as a limiting factor in Dead Indian and Conde Creek systems.5 The effects of large wood on stream form and function are positive, creating pools, trapping sediment, providing cover for fish and other aquatic species, and stabilizing banks during high flow events. Beaver have historically contributed wood in the form of beaver dams, to these systems. Beaver dams are present in the upper section of Dead Indian but absent in Conde Creek. Two dams were observed on Dead Indian Creek, below the confluence with Conde Creek.6 South Fork of Little Butte Creek and tributaries have been identified by Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) (1994) as water quality limited under Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act. From the mouth to Beaver Dam Creek, South Fork of Little Butte Creek is water quality limited due to flow modification, habitat modification, sediment, and summer temperature. Dead Indian and Conde Creeks are limited by summer high temperatures, exceeding the maximum 7-day average for temperature (>64 F). Temperature monitors placed throughout Conde Creek and upper Dead Indian Creek during the summer of 1998 found water temperatures ranging from 65 - 77 F in late July. 7 The geology of an area plays an important role in describing fish habitat through the physical processes driving a system.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Butte Creek Watershed Assessment
    Little Butte Creek Watershed Assessment Little Butte Creek Watershed Council August 2003 Abstract The Little Butte Creek Watershed Assessment has been prepared for the Little Butte Creek Watershed Council with funding from the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB). The Assessment was prepared using the guidelines set forth in the Governor’s Watershed Enhancement Board’s 1999 Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual. The purpose of this document is to assess the current conditions and trends of human caused and ecologic processes within the Little Butte Creek Watershed and compare them with historic conditions. Many important ecological processes within the watershed have been degraded over the last 150 years of human activity. This Assessment details those locations and processes that are in need of restoration as well as those that are operating as a healthy system. The Assessment was conducted primarily at the 5th field watershed level, that of the entire Little Butte Creek Watershed. List and describe field watershed levels below. Where possible, the analyses was refined to the smaller 6th field watershed level, thirteen of which exist within the Little Butte Creek Watershed. The assessment also notes gaps in data and lists recommendations for future research and data collection. It is intended that this document, and the Little Butte Creek Watershed Action Plan be used as guides for future research and watershed protection and enhancement over the next decade. The document was developed using existing data. No new data was collected for this project. Where data was lacking, it was detailed for future work and study. Acknowledgements This assessment was compiled and written by Steve Mason.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Rogue Watershed Assessment
    Upper Rogue Watershed Assessment Chapter 1 Introduction and Watershed Overview TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION AND WATERSHED OVERVIEW...................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 1.2 The Players .....................................................................................................................1 1.3 Approach.........................................................................................................................2 1.4 Historical Background ...................................................................................................3 1.5 General Overview ...........................................................................................................5 1.5.1 Trail Creek Subwatershed .....................................................................................6 1.5.2 Elk Creek Subwatershed .......................................................................................7 1.5.3 Upper Rogue River Subwatershed........................................................................9 1.5.4 South Fork Rogue River Subwatershed..............................................................11 1.5.5 Big Butte Creek Subwatershed ...........................................................................12 1.5.6 Lost Creek Lake Subwatershed ..........................................................................14 1.5.7 Shady Cove
    [Show full text]