DOCSLIB.ORG

Prepared on Behalf of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration GEOMETRIC INTERPRETATION of LUNAR CRATERS G23QIJQ8

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prepared on Behalf of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration GEOMETRIC INTERPRETATION of LUNAR CRATERS G23QIJQ8 Prepared on behalf of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration GEOMETRIC INTERPRETATION OF LUNAR CRATERS G23QIJQ8 MONIES ALPES MONIES ARISTILLUS SPITZBERGENSIS • < PALUS PUTREDINIS ;i Impact craters and other features on the Moon, photographed by Apollo 15 crew while in orbit 106 km above surface on July 31, 1971. Oblique view is north across eastern Mare Imbrium. The horizon lies about 500 km from the lava-flooded 80-km-diameter crater Archimedes. Out-of- focus object in lower right corner is part of Command Service Module. Sun is to right. Apollo 15 mapping-camera photograph 1540. Geometric Interpretation of Lunar Craters By RICHARD J. PIKE APOLLO 15-17 ORBITAL INVESTIGATIONS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1046-C Prepared on behalf of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1980 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY H. William Menard, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Pike, Richard J. Geometric interpretation of lunar craters. (Apollo 15-17 orbital investigation) (Geological Survey professional paper : 1046-C) Bibliography: p. C60-C65. Supt.ofDocs.no.: I 19.16:1046-C 1. Lunar craters-Data processing. 2. Lunar craters- Statistical methods. I. Title. II. Series. III. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Professional paper ; 1046-C. QB591.P73 559.9*1 79-607927 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Abstract ________________________________ Cl Size dependence in the shape of fresh impact craters—Continued Introduction ________________________________ 1 Ratio-level variations—Continued Acknowledgments ________________________ 3 Rim height__________________________ C33 The new data __________________________________ 3 Width of rim flank _____________________ 35 Crater geometry and crater genesis ____________________ 5 Rim-wall slope ______________________ 37 Computer classification of analogs ______________ 5 Floor diameter ____ __________________ 38 Experimental methods __________________________ 6 Rim-crest circularity ______________________ 38 The crater sample _______________________ 7 Evenness of rim crest _________________ 40 Interpretation of principal components __________ 9 Nonratio variations-___________________ 41 Classification by principal components __________ 11 Index data ___________________________ 43 Classification by cluster analysis __________ 14 Frequency data____________________ 44 The caldera analogy _______________________ 17 Discussion ______________________________ 45 Predicting crater genesis ___________________ 18 Depth versus rim-wall width ___________________ 46 The Linne controversy resolved _________________ 18 Some alternative explanations_______________ 49 Secondary-impact craters _______________________ 22 Minor differences in crater shape _________________ 53 Lunar central volcanoes.-____________________ 23 Mare-terra contrasts ___________-_________ 54 Cratered domes ________________________ 23 Far side-near side contrasts ____________________ 54 Cratered cones __________________________ 25 Azimuth-dependent differences ________________ 56 Dark-halo craters________________________________ 26 Summary and conclusions.______________________ 58 Smooth-rimmed craters ___________________ 26 References cited ________________________________ 60 Summit craters on central peaks ________________ 29 Supplemental information-_____________________ 66 Size dependence in the shape of fresh impact craters ________ 30 Measuring crater dimensions __________________ 66 Ratio-level variations._________________ 31 Tabulation of the new data __________________ 66 Depth ____________________________ 32 ILLUSTRATIONS FRONTISPIECE Oblique view across Mare Imbrium of craters and other features on the Moon. Page PLATE 1. Dendrogram displaying cluster classification of 418 craters __— ———— ______ —————— _____ — ___ In pocket FIGURE 1. Cross section of crater Proclus showing six topographic dimensions _______— — — —— — -___ ———— --— C4 2. Graph showing correlations of crater types with the first principal component _____ — — —— ————— — — ———— 11 3. Diagram showing scores of crater types on the first three principal components — —— -___ ——— ——— —————— 13 4. Diagram showing cross sections of two crater classes in plate 1 ___________ — ___ —— ______ — _____—————— 15 5. Photograph of the crater Linne __________________________—__ —— ______ —— —— __ —— —— _______ 19 6. Diagrams showing linear topographic profiles and rim-crest outline of Linne —— ——— —— ______ —— _ — ——— __ 20 7-14. Photographs showing: 7. Detail of crater Linne _________________________—__ —— ——— __ —— ___- ——— -- —— --- 21 8. Secondary craters from crater Aristarchus _________-___ ——— ____________-__---_----_ ——— — 22 9. Catena Davy ________________________________________________——————— 23 10. Cratered domes in northern Mare Tranquillitatis _____________ ———— _______ ——— ___ ——— __———— 24 11. Cratered dome near crater Milichius___________________ —— —— _________ ——— __ —— ______ ——— ___ 24 12. Cratered cone in Mare Nubium ___________________-_— — —— — ——— ——— ———— - — - 25 13. Dark-halo craters on floor of crater Alphonsus _________ —— ________ ———— __ ——— ____ —— ___ 26 14. The crater Lassell ____________________________-__-___-——————— ———— --- 27 15. Graphs showing frequency distribution of rim-crest circularity, height/depth ratio, and width/diameter ratio -___ 28 16. Photograph of central peaks of crater Theophilus ________________ ___ ______ _______________ 29 17. Photograph of central peaks of crater Levi-Civita ______________ ———— ________ —— ————— __ —— ——— _——— 29 18. Photograph of central peaks of crater Tsiolkovskiy _________________ —— ———— ——— —— _____ — _____ 30 19-26. Graphs showing: 19. Relation between depth and diameter for 212 lunar craters ____________________________ 33 20. Relation between rim height and diameter for 162 lunar craters ____________________________________ 34 VI CONTENTS FIGURES 19-26. Graphs showing—Continued Page 21. Relation between flank width and diameter for 162 lunar craters ________--- —— ————— --——— C36 22. Relation between slope of rim wall and diameter for 107 lunar craters __—____ — _ ———————— -_-— 37 23. Relation between floor diameter and rim-crest diameter for 91 lunar craters ———— ————— ——— --—— 39 24. Relation between rim-crest circularity and diameter for 201 lunar craters _______———————- — — 40 25. Relation between rim-crest relief and diameter for 46 lunar craters _ _______- ———————— - —— - 41 26. Relation between coefficient of variation of rim-crest elevation and diameter for 35 lunar craters———— 42 27. Photomosaic showing the crater Aristarchus _____________---________ ——— — ———— —————— - —— - 43 28. Graph showing relation between morphology index and rim diameter for 152 lunar craters _ — ——————— — — 45 29. Graph showing transition from simple to complex morphologies in lunar craters _______ ——————— __———— 46 30. Graph showing relation between crater depth and rim-wall width for 107 lunar craters __—__ —— —————— — 47 31. Photographs of craters Diophantus and Delisle ________________________--————— — ————— --- 49 32. Graph showing relation between peak height and rim diameter for 29 lunar craters ————— ——— ——————— __ 51 33. Graph showing relation between depth and diameter for 21 terrestrial impact craters ——————— ————— ——— 52 34. Photograph of crater Humboldt ___________________________________ ——— _ —————— ____— 53 35. Graph showing relation between depth and diameter for 950 lunar craters _____________———— ——— ___— 55 36. Graph showing relation between depth and diameter for 58 far-side and 78 near-side craters __ ——— ——— ___— 56 37. Graph showing relation between rim height and diameter for 54 far-side and 78 near-side craters ——— —— _—— 57 TABLES Page TABLE 1. Measurements for a sampling of fresh lunar craters______________-_________________ —— _————— C5 2. Statistical summary of untransformed variables for 23 crater types ______— ————————— — ————— ___— 8 3. Matrix of similarity coefficients for principal-components analysis ____——————————————— —— — _____— 9 4. Principal-components results for seven variables and 418 craters ____________________--——— 9 5. Composition of clusters in plate 1 by crater type __________________________ — — _-_____---- 15 6. Numerical data for geometric model of fresh lunar craters__________-________— — — - —————— — 32 7. Morphologic index numbers of selected lunar craters _____________-____-_____—-- — ——————— 44 8. Qualitative deviations from mean rim-crest elevation ____________________________________ 58 9. Dimensions of 623 lunar craters _________________________________________________ 68 10. Dimensions of 59 terrestrial craters _______________________________________-—_____ 77 APOLLO 15-17 ORBITAL INVESTIGATIONS GEOMETRIC INTERPRETATION OF LUNAR CRATERS By RICHARD J. PIKE ABSTRACT ematically where practicable. These relations constitute a shape model that constrains interpretations of fresh craters on the Moon. Geometric properties of the Moon's craters between about 400 m The size-dependent changes reflect the occurrence of central peaks, and about 300 km across have been examined at a high and hitherto rim-wall terraces, and a flat floor within craters over 10 to 20 km unattainable level of accuracy using new topographic measurements across. Interpretation of these features remains speculative. The made on contour maps compiled
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aitken Basin
    Geological and geochemical analysis of units in the South Pole – Aitken Basin A.M. Borst¹,², F.S. Bexkens¹,², B. H. Foing², D. Koschny² ¹ Department of Petrology, VU University Amsterdam ² SCI-S. Research and Scientific Support Department, ESA – ESTEC Student Planetary Workshop 10-10-2008 ESA/ESTEC The Netherlands The South Pole – Aitken Basin Largest and oldest Lunar impact basin - Diameter > 2500 km - Depth > 12 km - Age 4.2 - 3.9 Ga Formed during Late heavy bombardment? Window into the interior and evolution of the Moon Priority target for future sample return missions Digital Elevation Model from Clementine altimetry data. Produced in ENVI, 50x vertical exaggeration, orthographic projection centered on the far side. Red +10 km, purple/black -10km. (A.M.Borst et.al. 2008) 1 The Moon and the SPA Basin Geochemistry Iron map South Pole – Aitken Basin mafic anomaly • High Fe, Th, Ti and Mg abundances • Excavation of mafic deep crustal / upper mantle material Thorium map Clementine 750 nm albedo map from USGS From Paul Lucey, J. Geophys. Res., 2000 Map-a-Planet What can we learn from the SPA Basin? • Large impacts; Implications and processes • Volcanism; Origin, age and difference with near side mare basalts • Cratering record; Age, frequency and size distribution • Late Heavy Bombardment; Intensity, duration and origin • Composition of the deeper crust and possibly upper mantle 2 Topics of SPA Basin study 1) Global structure of the basin (F.S. Bexkens et al, 2008) • Rims, rings, ejecta distribution, subsequent craters modifications, reconstructive
    [Show full text]
  • Geoscience and a Lunar Base
    " t N_iSA Conference Pubhcatmn 3070 " i J Geoscience and a Lunar Base A Comprehensive Plan for Lunar Explora, tion unclas HI/VI 02907_4 at ,unar | !' / | .... ._-.;} / [ | -- --_,,,_-_ |,, |, • • |,_nrrr|l , .l -- - -- - ....... = F _: .......... s_ dd]T_- ! JL --_ - - _ '- "_r: °-__.......... / _r NASA Conference Publication 3070 Geoscience and a Lunar Base A Comprehensive Plan for Lunar Exploration Edited by G. Jeffrey Taylor Institute of Meteoritics University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico Paul D. Spudis U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Astrogeology Flagstaff, Arizona Proceedings of a workshop sponsored by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C., and held at the Lunar and Planetary Institute Houston, Texas August 25-26, 1988 IW_A National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of Management Scientific and Technical Information Division 1990 PREFACE This report was produced at the request of Dr. Michael B. Duke, Director of the Solar System Exploration Division of the NASA Johnson Space Center. At a meeting of the Lunar and Planetary Sample Team (LAPST), Dr. Duke (at the time also Science Director of the Office of Exploration, NASA Headquarters) suggested that future lunar geoscience activities had not been planned systematically and that geoscience goals for the lunar base program were not articulated well. LAPST is a panel that advises NASA on lunar sample allocations and also serves as an advocate for lunar science within the planetary science community. LAPST took it upon itself to organize some formal geoscience planning for a lunar base by creating a document that outlines the types of missions and activities that are needed to understand the Moon and its geologic history.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 40. the System of Lunar Craters, Quadrant Ii Alice P
    NO. 40. THE SYSTEM OF LUNAR CRATERS, QUADRANT II by D. W. G. ARTHUR, ALICE P. AGNIERAY, RUTH A. HORVATH ,tl l C.A. WOOD AND C. R. CHAPMAN \_9 (_ /_) March 14, 1964 ABSTRACT The designation, diameter, position, central-peak information, and state of completeness arc listed for each discernible crater in the second lunar quadrant with a diameter exceeding 3.5 km. The catalog contains more than 2,000 items and is illustrated by a map in 11 sections. his Communication is the second part of The However, since we also have suppressed many Greek System of Lunar Craters, which is a catalog in letters used by these authorities, there was need for four parts of all craters recognizable with reasonable some care in the incorporation of new letters to certainty on photographs and having diameters avoid confusion. Accordingly, the Greek letters greater than 3.5 kilometers. Thus it is a continua- added by us are always different from those that tion of Comm. LPL No. 30 of September 1963. The have been suppressed. Observers who wish may use format is the same except for some minor changes the omitted symbols of Blagg and Miiller without to improve clarity and legibility. The information in fear of ambiguity. the text of Comm. LPL No. 30 therefore applies to The photographic coverage of the second quad- this Communication also. rant is by no means uniform in quality, and certain Some of the minor changes mentioned above phases are not well represented. Thus for small cra- have been introduced because of the particular ters in certain longitudes there are no good determi- nature of the second lunar quadrant, most of which nations of the diameters, and our values are little is covered by the dark areas Mare Imbrium and better than rough estimates.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary Glossary
    Glossary Glossary Albedo A measure of an object’s reflectivity. A pure white reflecting surface has an albedo of 1.0 (100%). A pitch-black, nonreflecting surface has an albedo of 0.0. The Moon is a fairly dark object with a combined albedo of 0.07 (reflecting 7% of the sunlight that falls upon it). The albedo range of the lunar maria is between 0.05 and 0.08. The brighter highlands have an albedo range from 0.09 to 0.15. Anorthosite Rocks rich in the mineral feldspar, making up much of the Moon’s bright highland regions. Aperture The diameter of a telescope’s objective lens or primary mirror. Apogee The point in the Moon’s orbit where it is furthest from the Earth. At apogee, the Moon can reach a maximum distance of 406,700 km from the Earth. Apollo The manned lunar program of the United States. Between July 1969 and December 1972, six Apollo missions landed on the Moon, allowing a total of 12 astronauts to explore its surface. Asteroid A minor planet. A large solid body of rock in orbit around the Sun. Banded crater A crater that displays dusky linear tracts on its inner walls and/or floor. 250 Basalt A dark, fine-grained volcanic rock, low in silicon, with a low viscosity. Basaltic material fills many of the Moon’s major basins, especially on the near side. Glossary Basin A very large circular impact structure (usually comprising multiple concentric rings) that usually displays some degree of flooding with lava. The largest and most conspicuous lava- flooded basins on the Moon are found on the near side, and most are filled to their outer edges with mare basalts.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Surfaces
    Chapter 4 PLANETARY SURFACES 4.1 The Absence of Bedrock A striking and obvious observation is that at full Moon, the lunar surface is bright from limb to limb, with only limited darkening toward the edges. Since this effect is not consistent with the intensity of light reflected from a smooth sphere, pre-Apollo observers concluded that the upper surface was porous on a centimeter scale and had the properties of dust. The thickness of the dust layer was a critical question for landing on the surface. The general view was that a layer a few meters thick of rubble and dust from the meteorite bombardment covered the surface. Alternative views called for kilometer thicknesses of fine dust, filling the maria. The unmanned missions, notably Surveyor, resolved questions about the nature and bearing strength of the surface. However, a somewhat surprising feature of the lunar surface was the completeness of the mantle or blanket of debris. Bedrock exposures are extremely rare, the occurrence in the wall of Hadley Rille (Fig. 6.6) being the only one which was observed closely during the Apollo missions. Fragments of rock excavated during meteorite impact are, of course, common, and provided both samples and evidence of co,mpetent rock layers at shallow levels in the mare basins. Freshly exposed surface material (e.g., bright rays from craters such as Tycho) darken with time due mainly to the production of glass during micro- meteorite impacts. Since some magnetic anomalies correlate with unusually bright regions, the solar wind bombardment (which is strongly deflected by the magnetic anomalies) may also be responsible for darkening the surface [I].
    [Show full text]
  • Bills Paid by Payee Second Quarter Fiscal Year 20/21
    BILLS PAID BY PAYEE SECOND QUARTER FISCAL YEAR 20/21 A complete detailed record is available at the Elko County Comptroller's Office. Office Hours: Monday-Friday 8:00A.M. until 5:00P.M. 540 Court St. Suite 101 Elko, NV 89801 Office Phone (775)753-7073*Disclaimer-The original and any duplicate or copy of each receipt, bill,check,warrant,voucher or other similar document that supports a transaction, the amount of which is shown in the total of this report, along with the name of the person whom such allowance is made and the purpose of the allowance, is a public record that is available for inspection and copying by any person pursuant to the provisions of chapter 239 of NRS. VENDOR CHECK ARGO COMPANY, INC 821.98 A ARNOLD BECK CONSTRUCTION 1,599.40 AT&T 3,697.06 5TH GEAR POWER SPORTS 41.74 AT&T MOBILITY 42.24 A PLUS URGENT CARE 766 AUTO GRAPHICS 400 A PLUS URGENT CARE ELKO 846.33 B A-1 RADIATOR REPAIR INC. 1,079.00 BARBARA J HOFHEINS 121.9 ACKERMAN MATTHEW 1388.93 BARBARA JO MAPLE 762.5 ADVANCE AUTO CARE 629.89 BARRY RENTAL 86.03 ADVANCED RADIOLOGY 1195.5 BEI CAPELI 5,000.00 AIRGAS 541.3 BERTOLINI VALVES INC 1,859.12 AIRPORT SHELL 9 BETTY HICKS 177.56 ALCOHOL MONITORING SYSTEMS INC 791 BLAINE ROBINSON & NIKIERA CAST 1,132.00 ALERTUS TECHNOLOGIES LLC 4,950.00 BLOHM JEWELERS INC 5,000.00 ALICIA GUAMAN 58 BLUE 360 MEDIA LLC 70.75 ALLIED UNIVERAL SECURITY SERVI 37,229.50 BOARD OF REGENTS 14300.04 ALLUSIVE IMAGES 5,000.00 BOB BARKER COMPANY 4418.55 ALYSSA K DANN 120 BONANZA PRODUCE 320.23 AMANDA JEAN GIRMAUDO 160 BOSS TANKS 5,024.00 AMBER DAWN
    [Show full text]
  • Small, Young Volcanic Deposits Around the Lunar Farside Craters Rosseland, Bolyai, and Roche
    44th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2013) 2024.pdf SMALL, YOUNG VOLCANIC DEPOSITS AROUND THE LUNAR FARSIDE CRATERS ROSSELAND, BOLYAI, AND ROCHE. J. H. Pasckert1, H. Hiesinger1, and C. H. van der Bogert1. 1Institut für Planetologie, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Wilhelm-Klemm-Str. 10, 48149 Münster, Germany. jhpasckert@uni- muenster.de Introduction: To understand the thermal evolu- mare basalts on the near- and farside. This gives us the tion of the Moon it is essential to investigate the vol- opportunity to investigate the history of small scale canic history of both the lunar near- and farside. While volcanism on the lunar farside. the lunar nearside is dominated by mare volcanism, the farside shows only some isolated mare deposits in the large craters and basins, like the South Pole-Aitken basin or Tsiolkovsky crater [e.g., 1-4]. This big differ- ence in volcanic activity between the near- and farside is of crucial importance for understanding the volcanic evolution of the Moon. The extensive mare volcanism of the lunar nearside has already been studied in great detail by numerous authors [e.g., 4-8] on the basis of Lunar Orbiter and Apollo data. New high-resolution data obtained by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) and the SELENE Terrain Camera (TC) now allow us to investigate the lunar farside in great detail. Basaltic volcanism of the lunar nearside was active for almost 3 Ga, lasting from ~3.9-4.0 Ga to ~1.2 Ga before present [5]. In contrast to the nearside, most eruptions of mare deposits on the lunar farside stopped much earlier, ~3.0 Ga ago [9].
    [Show full text]
  • B. Apollo 16 Regional Geologic Setting
    B. APOLLO 16REGIONAL GEOLOGIC SETTING By CARROLL ANN HODGES CONTENTS Page Geography 6 Geologic description of Cayley plains and Descartes mountains 6 Relation in time and space to basins and craters 8 ILLUSTRATIONS Page FIGURE 1. Composite photograph of the lunar near side showing geographic features and multiring basins 7 2. Photographic mosaic of Apollo 16 landing site and vicinity 8 GEOGRAPHY Soderblom and Boyce,1972). The type area of the Cayley Formation is east of the crater Cayley, north of Apollo 16 landed at approximately 15”30’ E., 9” S. on the landing site (Morris and Wilhelms, 1967); the the relatively level Cayley plains, adjacent to the rug- name was extended to the apparently similar plains ged Descartes mountains (Milton, 1972; Hodges, material at the Apollo 16 site (Milton, 1972; Hodges, 1972a). Approximately 70 km east is the west-facing 1972a). These materials were presumed to be represen- escarpment of the Kant plateau, part of the uplifted tative of the widespread photogeologic unit, Imbrian third ring of the Nectaris basin and topographically light plains, which covers about 5 percent of the lunar the highest area on the lunar near side. With respect to highlands surface (Wilhelms and McCauley, 1971; the centers of the three best-developed multiringed Howard and others, 1974). Characteristics include rel- basins, the site is about 600 km west of Nectaris, 1,600 atively level surfaces, intermediate albedo, and nearly km southeast of Imbrium, and 3,500 km east-northeast identical crater size-frequency distributions. of Orientale. The nearest mare materials are in The plains were first interpreted as smooth facies of Tranquillitatis, about 300 km north (fig.1).
    [Show full text]
  • 0 Lunar and Planetary Institute Provided by the NASA Astrophysics Data System LAVA FLOODING of EARLY PLANETARY CRUSTS
    LAVA FLOODING OF EARLY PLANETARY CRUSTS: GEOMETRY, THICKNESS, AND VOLUMES CF FLOODED LUNAR HIGHLAND TERRA IN. James W. Head, Dept. of Geol og ica I Sciences, Brown Univ., Providence, RI 02912. Recognition of the volcanic origin of surface deposits on ancient cra- tered planetary surfaces provides important information on the presence and significance of melting in the interior. Establishment of the composition, age, and volume of such deposits provides additional clues concerning the characteristics of the thermal history of the planet.' In addition, the Thickness, geometry, and volumes of volcanic deposits provide important data for understanding tectonics and I i thospheric deformation. Once deposits have been recognized as of volcanic origin, it has often been difficult to estab- , . , I sh thicknesses and volumes because in the processes of emp lacement, l avas cover the initial crustal surface, obscuring the geometry of the pre-volcanic terrain. In addition to geophysical analyses, attempts to establish thick- nesses and volumes have concentrated on four approaches: I ) measuring diam- eters and sxposed rim heights of impact craters protruding through the depos- i TS; ' 2 l @cati ng craters in vo l can ic deposits that have excavated sub-vo l- can i c material ;" 3) using stratigraphic techniques; 7 and 4) using the geom- etry of co~parableunflooded regions as models for the initial topography. 2 P<lihouyh these approaches have provided significant advances in the under- stand ing of the emp lacement of the l unar maria,' there are sti l l basic uncer- ta inties concerning thicknesses and vol umes in many areas.
    [Show full text]
  • March 21–25, 2016
    FORTY-SEVENTH LUNAR AND PLANETARY SCIENCE CONFERENCE PROGRAM OF TECHNICAL SESSIONS MARCH 21–25, 2016 The Woodlands Waterway Marriott Hotel and Convention Center The Woodlands, Texas INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT Universities Space Research Association Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS Stephen Mackwell, Lunar and Planetary Institute Eileen Stansbery, NASA Johnson Space Center PROGRAM COMMITTEE CHAIRS David Draper, NASA Johnson Space Center Walter Kiefer, Lunar and Planetary Institute PROGRAM COMMITTEE P. Doug Archer, NASA Johnson Space Center Nicolas LeCorvec, Lunar and Planetary Institute Katherine Bermingham, University of Maryland Yo Matsubara, Smithsonian Institute Janice Bishop, SETI and NASA Ames Research Center Francis McCubbin, NASA Johnson Space Center Jeremy Boyce, University of California, Los Angeles Andrew Needham, Carnegie Institution of Washington Lisa Danielson, NASA Johnson Space Center Lan-Anh Nguyen, NASA Johnson Space Center Deepak Dhingra, University of Idaho Paul Niles, NASA Johnson Space Center Stephen Elardo, Carnegie Institution of Washington Dorothy Oehler, NASA Johnson Space Center Marc Fries, NASA Johnson Space Center D. Alex Patthoff, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Cyrena Goodrich, Lunar and Planetary Institute Elizabeth Rampe, Aerodyne Industries, Jacobs JETS at John Gruener, NASA Johnson Space Center NASA Johnson Space Center Justin Hagerty, U.S. Geological Survey Carol Raymond, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Lindsay Hays, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Paul Schenk,
    [Show full text]
  • Testing Hypotheses for the Origin of Steep Slope of Lunar Size-Frequency Distribution for Small Craters
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Springer - Publisher Connector Earth Planets Space, 55, 39–51, 2003 Testing hypotheses for the origin of steep slope of lunar size-frequency distribution for small craters Noriyuki Namiki1 and Chikatoshi Honda2 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Kyushu University, Hakozaki 6-10-1, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan 2The Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Yoshinodai 3-1-1, Sagamihara 229-8510, Japan (Received June 13, 2001; Revised June 24, 2002; Accepted January 6, 2003) The crater size-frequency distribution of lunar maria is characterized by the change in slope of the population between 0.3 and 4 km in crater diameter. The origin of the steep segment in the distribution is not well understood. Nonetheless, craters smaller than a few km in diameter are widely used to estimate the crater retention age for areas so small that the number of larger craters is statistically insufficient. Future missions to the moon, which will obtain high resolution images, will provide a new, large data set of small craters. Thus it is important to review current hypotheses for their distributions before future missions are launched. We examine previous and new arguments and data bearing on the admixture of endogenic and secondary craters, horizontal heterogeneity of the substratum, and the size-frequency distribution of the primary production function. The endogenic crater and heterogeneous substratum hypotheses are seen to have little evidence in their favor, and can be eliminated. The primary production hypothesis fails to explain a wide variation of the size-frequency distribution of Apollo panoramic photographs.
    [Show full text]
  • DMAAC – February 1973
    LUNAR TOPOGRAPHIC ORTHOPHOTOMAP (LTO) AND LUNAR ORTHOPHOTMAP (LO) SERIES (Published by DMATC) Lunar Topographic Orthophotmaps and Lunar Orthophotomaps Scale: 1:250,000 Projection: Transverse Mercator Sheet Size: 25.5”x 26.5” The Lunar Topographic Orthophotmaps and Lunar Orthophotomaps Series are the first comprehensive and continuous mapping to be accomplished from Apollo Mission 15-17 mapping photographs. This series is also the first major effort to apply recent advances in orthophotography to lunar mapping. Presently developed maps of this series were designed to support initial lunar scientific investigations primarily employing results of Apollo Mission 15-17 data. Individual maps of this series cover 4 degrees of lunar latitude and 5 degrees of lunar longitude consisting of 1/16 of the area of a 1:1,000,000 scale Lunar Astronautical Chart (LAC) (Section 4.2.1). Their apha-numeric identification (example – LTO38B1) consists of the designator LTO for topographic orthophoto editions or LO for orthophoto editions followed by the LAC number in which they fall, followed by an A, B, C or D designator defining the pertinent LAC quadrant and a 1, 2, 3, or 4 designator defining the specific sub-quadrant actually covered. The following designation (250) identifies the sheets as being at 1:250,000 scale. The LTO editions display 100-meter contours, 50-meter supplemental contours and spot elevations in a red overprint to the base, which is lithographed in black and white. LO editions are identical except that all relief information is omitted and selenographic graticule is restricted to border ticks, presenting an umencumbered view of lunar features imaged by the photographic base.
    [Show full text]