The Historical Context for Indigenous Culture Change in Dixie Valley Is Critical When Considering the Nature and Causation of Such Changes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT FOR INDIGENOUS CULTURE CHANGE IN DIXIE VALLEY, NORTHEAST CALIFORNIA: A PRELUDE TO COLLABORATIVE ARCHAEOLOGY ____________ A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, Chico ____________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in Anthropology ____________ by Lowell W. Thomas, IV Spring 2015 THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT FOR INDIGENOUS CULTURE CHANGE IN DIXIE VALLEY, NORTHEAST CALIFORNIA: A PRELUDE TO COLLABORATIVE ARCHAEOLOGY A Thesis by Lowell W. Thomas, IV Spring 2015 APPROVED BY THE DEAN OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND VICE PROVOST FOR RESEARCH: _________________________________ Eun K. Park, Ph.D. APPROVED BY THE GRADUATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE: ______________________________ _________________________________ Guy Q. King, Ph.D. Antoinette Martinez, Ph.D., Chair Graduate Coordinator _________________________________ Frank Bayham, Ph.D. DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my father, Lowell (Wes) Thomas III, who instilled in me a deep appreciation for the Pit River, its people, and its past. Your love, unending support, and impact on my life and work is immeasurable. Thank you. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank all of my family. Amanda Pickren, my grandmother Marilyn Thomas, my parents Wes Thomas and Laurene Hamilton, Vince Cunningham, and Celeste Thomas have each been especially supportive throughout this entire process. I extend my deepest gratitude to Ms. Anna Barnes and her family for inviting me into their home and sharing stories of Dixie Valley. My friends Deanna Commons, Alden Neel, Wayne Wilson and Adrienne Scott have my appreciation for listening to my rants and offering their advice on countless occasions. This research would not have been possible without the support and guidance of my committee and advisors: Dr. Martinez, Dr. Bayham and Dr. Fox. To Dr. Martinez, your influence as a scholar, a mentor, and as a friend has guided my academic and professional development beyond repayment. I thank Dr. Eric Ritter, Lisa Westwood, Adam Gutierrez, Melanie Beasley and Nicole (Ramirez) Thomas who helped me into and through the critical first steps of this journey. I also thank The Archaeological Conservancy for giving me the opportunity to research the Fast Preserve, as well as Greg Handa, Aimee VanHavermaat, Devin Snyder, Jack Scott, Laura Cirillo, Gerry Gates, Jen Rovanpera, Colin Corr, Brooke Kaupanger, Brandon Vlassoff, and Jason Ryoo for their help in the office and in the field. Finally, I would like to acknowledge all those in the Pit River country who struggled to persevere in the face of great trauma over the past two centuries. Their story iv lives on in the landscape, oral and written histories (including this thesis), and in the many descendants who carry forth their legacies today. v TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Dedication................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................... iv List of Tables.............................................................................................................. ix List of Figures............................................................................................................. x Abstract....................................................................................................................... xi CHAPTER I. Introduction.............................................................................................. 1 Research Objectives ..................................................................... 2 Why Is This Research Important? ................................................ 6 A Prelude to Collaborative Archaeology ..................................... 8 Personal Context........................................................................... 9 Archival, Ethnographic and Ethnological Data Collection .......... 11 Oral Interview Process ................................................................. 12 Limitations of this Study .............................................................. 12 Thesis Organization and Chapter Content.................................... 13 II. Theoretical Orientation............................................................................. 16 Postprocessual Archaeology and Its Place in Americanist Archaeology.......................................................................... 16 Critical Ethnography, Critical Theory and the Use of Ethnographic Texts in Anthropology.................................... 17 Critical Theory and Atsugewi Ethnography................................. 19 Coloniality of Power Theory........................................................ 21 Collaborative Archaeology: The Relationship Between Archaeologists and Descendant Communities...................... 23 Chapter Summary......................................................................... 25 vi CHAPTER PAGE III. Review of Ethnographic Sources ............................................................. 26 Ethnographic Context................................................................... 26 A.L. Kroeber and the University of California, Berkeley ............ 27 Implications of U.C. Berkeley Ethnographic/Ethnologic Research................................................................................ 30 Ethnohistorical Literature Review................................................ 32 Primary Ethnographic Research on the Atsugewi........................ 32 Primary Ethnographic and Ethnohistorical Reports Pertaining To the Achomawi and Atsugewi ......................... 44 Secondary Works Dealing With Atsugewi and Achomawi History................................................................................... 51 Miscellaneous Ethnohistoric Sources on the Atsugewi................ 53 Chapter Summary......................................................................... 54 IV. Ethnographic Overview............................................................................ 57 Traditional Atsugewi Life Ways .................................................. 58 Chapter Summary......................................................................... 73 V. Historical Overview for the Dixie Valley and Greater Pit River Region (1827-1887)........................................................................ 75 A Broader Context: Extermination and Removal in California (1848-1887) ......................................................... 76 Contact, Extermination and Removal in the Pit River Region (1827-1887) .............................................................. 78 Euroamerican Contact and Settlement in Dixie Valley and Vicinity (1848-1907)...................................................... 83 Chapter Summary......................................................................... 88 VI. Effects of the Dawes Allotment Act in Dixie Valley, Northeast California ................................................................................. 89 The Allotment Era: 1887-1934..................................................... 89 Reservation and Public Domain Trust Parcels ............................. 91 Allotment Era in Dixie Valley, Northeastern California.............. 93 Adapting to a Changed World: Acculturation and Living Conditions During the Allotment Era in Dixie Valley .......................................................................... 96 The Hasey Johnson Estate: Sus 229 (The Fast Preserve)............. 104 Fractionation and the Hasey Johnson Allotment.......................... 110 vii CHAPTER PAGE The Andrew Johnson Estate: Sus 929 .......................................... 113 Discussion..................................................................................... 114 Chapter Summary......................................................................... 118 VII. The Apwaruke and Dixie Valley Today................................................... 119 Ms. Anna Barnes and Dixie Valley.............................................. 120 Apwaruke Access To and Use of Dixie Valley Today................. 122 Tribal Concerns with Resource Management .............................. 124 Collaborative Archaeology and Future Research in the Dixie Valley Region.............................................................. 126 Compliance Archaeology, Academic Archaeology, and No-Disturbance Requests...................................................... 127 A Call for Collaboration............................................................... 130 Chapter Summary......................................................................... 132 VIII. Discussion and Conclusions..................................................................... 134 Dispossession: A Colonial Legacy............................................... 134 A Summary and Context for Early Research Among the Atsugewi ......................................................................... 137 Implications for Archaeology....................................................... 139 Conclusion.................................................................................... 151 References Cited......................................................................................................... 152 Appendices A. Oral Interview Questions.......................................................................... 165 B. General Land Office Records: Dixie Valley