DOCSLIB.ORG

External Content.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
External Content.Pdf NEW PERSPECTIVES IN THE THEOLOGY OF JUDAISM NEW PERSPECTIVES IN THE THEOLOGY OF JUDAISM by Shubert Spero Boston 2013 Copyright © 2013 Academic Studies Press All rights reserved ISBN 978-1-61811-267-5 (cloth) ISBN 978-1-61811-268-2 (electronic) Cover design by Ivan Grave Published by Academic Studies Press in 2013 28 Montfern Avenue Brighton, MA 02135, USA [email protected] www.academicstudiespress.com Effective April 7th 2021, this book will be subject to a CC-BY-NC license. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/. Other than as provided by these licenses, no part of this book may be reproduced, transmitted, or displayed by any electronic or mechanical means without permission from the publisher or as permitted by law. Contents Note From the Publisher The Chair, the Incumbent, and the Donors ...................7 Introduction ................................................9 PART I Viewing Judaism as a Whole Chapter 1 Is There an Indigenous Jewish Theology? ...................24 Chapter 2 Toward a Philosophy of Modern Orthodoxy .................41 Chapter 3 Is Judaism an Optimistic Religion? ........................55 Chapter 4 The Meaning of Existentialism for Orthodoxy ...............69 PART II Torah in Depth Chapter 5 The Biblical Stories of Creation, the Garden of Eden, and the Flood: History or Metaphor? ......................82 Chapter 6 Paradise Lost or Outgrown? ..............................98 Chapter 7 Multiplicity of Meaning as a Device in Biblical Narrative .... 118 Chapter 8 Torat Hashem/Torat Moshe: Exploring their Respective Roles ........................ 133 PART III Reaching for the Heights Chapter 9 Is God Truly Unknowable? ............................. 166 Chapter 10 Love of God .......................................... 182 Chapter 11 Selfhood and Godhood in Jewish Thought and Modern Philosophy ............................... 194 Chapter 12 Unity of God as Dynamic of Redemption ................. 208 PART IV The Analytic in Action Chapter 13 Toward an Ethical Theory of Judaism .................... 220 Chapter 14 What is Self-theory, and Does Judaism Need One? ......... 244 Chapter 15 Judaism and the Aesthetic ............................. 275 Chapter 16 Providential History and the Anthropic Principle .......... 299 Chapter 17 The Role of Reason in Jewish Religious Belief ............. 316 PART V History Come to Life Chapter 18 The Religious Meaning of the State of Israel .............. 338 Chapter 19 Religious Zionism: What is It? .......................... 357 Chapter 20 Does Messianism Imply Inevitability? ................... 368 Acknowledgements ........................................ 385 Index ................................................... 386 Note From the Publisher The Chair, the Incumbent, and the Donors In January 1983, Bar-llan University in Israel, under the presidency of Professor Emanuel Rackman, announced the estab- lishment of the Irving I. Stone Chair in Basic Jewish Thought, with Professor Shubert Spero as its inaugural incumbent. The Chair was chartered to undertake the academic examination of the implications of Judaism, especially Jewish morality and history, for contemporary so- ciety, and was designed to serve as a vehicle for teaching, research, and publication in this area. In establishing the Chair’s Endowment Fund, Irving Stone (1909-2000) wrote in the charter document: ...the main reason for our family’s establishment of the Chair was to make it possible for Shubert Spero, who was then retir- ing after 33 years as our spiritual leader in Cleveland, to bring his important centrist views of Judaism to the attention of the Israeli public. Each term of his subsequent 29-year academic career at Bar Ilan, the incumbent taught two sections of his signature year-long course entitled Dat u’Musar, “Religion and Morality,” in which he expounded on the special nature and role of morality in Judaism to the more than 3,000 students who took his course over the years. Under the aegis of the Chair, Spero published innumerable articles in academic journals as well as for the local press, lectured widely in Israel and abroad, and for ten years delivered the annual Irving I. Stone Lecture at the College of Jewish Studies in Cleveland, Ohio. His research during this period resulted in the publication of two works: Holocaust and Return to Zion: A Study in Jewish Philosophy of History (2000) and Aspects of Rabbi Joseph Dov Solovetchick’s Philosophy of Judaism (2009). 7 Preface. The Chair, the Incumbent, and the Donors The link to the Stone funding has an additional dimension, beyond the academic. This dimension comes through in the warm words of a personal note written by Mr. Morry Weiss, chairman of the Stone Foundation: Shubert Spero and his wife Iris have been dear friends for well over 50 years. As my wife and I celebrate our 50 years of marriage, I recall that when I was courting Judy, it was Iris who volunteered to be my character witness. She assured my future in-laws (Irving and Beatrice Stone) that their daughter was choosing her mate wisely. For Iris taking that leap of faith on my behalf, and in honor of our golden anniversary, I am delighted to have the opportunity to show our deep appreciation for two individuals we so greatly admire by making possible the publication of this current volume of the rabbi’s most insightful essays. Introduction The words “new” and “theology” in the title of this volume may sound ominous to traditionalists. Let me therefore at the very outset set forth the meaning of these terms according to their pri- mary current use and outline the general thrust of this work. The term “theology” has come to mean simply a rational analysis of religious be- liefs, or a “philosophy of religion.” The reason I use the word “theology” instead of “philosophy” is because it is considered the more appropriate term to use when the analysis is being done by one who stands within the religion being analyzed, in short a believer. The term “philosophy” is best understood as describing an activity in which certain types of questions are directed at almost any subject matter. These are inquiries into the overriding purpose or underlying principles of any discipline or enterprise. That is, they are questions which are the most general in nature, seeking a picture of the whole, or alternatively the most basic, seeking to uncover the ultimate nature of things. In pursuit of these philosophical questions one is expected to use a method of thinking which is at once analytic and critical, rather than speculative, giving pri- ority to the search for meaning before looking for the truth, a method which requires justification for any truth-claims. In this view, which sees philosophy primarily as a method of inquiry, the goal is not, as it has been in the past, to wed or reconcile Judaism with some “outside” existing philosophic system but rather to develop a rational understand- ing (theology) which is indigenous in the sense that it grows out of the primary sources of Judaism. It is safe to say that philosophical questions in the sense just de- scribed are generally not dealt with in Judaism’s primary sources, i.e., the Tanach, or Written Torah. Except perhaps for the Book of Job and some isolated verses elsewhere, Tanach in its three divisions is essentially a library of “first order” statements about history, law, morality, poetry, 9 Introduction exhortations, promises, and visions of the future.1 It is not reflective. It does not ask questions of itself. It is in rabbinic literature that we first begin to find short excursions into what we might call philosophical inquiry. Chapter 1 discusses in greater detail the role of philosophy in Judaism. Beginning, however, with Saadia Gaon (882-942) and continuing up to the present, elements of the beliefs and practices of Judaism have been subjected to systematic rational analysis, with the results consti- tuting aspects of the theology of Judaism. Now this is where the term “perspective” becomes relevant. While anyone claiming to be doing philosophy must abide by the accepted methods, i.e., must be critical, coherent, consistent, and comprehen- sive, there is an individual subjective element, usually overlooked, that is often present from the very beginning of the process. We may call this the individual’s “perspective,” that is, certain unexpressed presup- positions or attitudes with which the individual views reality and by which he evaluates the relative importance of things. This explains why different individuals examining the same facts can arrive at different, sometimes mutually exclusive, conclusions. Thus, for example, it is clear that one of the presuppositions of Maimonides, a doctrine that in his day was considered self-evident, was that human reason was capable of attaining knowledge of the metaphysical realm. Today, however, having shown this belief to be largely incorrect, we no longer put any credence in logical proofs for the existence of God, as Maimonides did. Another illustration of “perspective” in Jewish theology is the view that different thinkers had of the importance of the principle of the Creation of the universe “out of nothing” (creatio ex nihilo). While Saadia thought it to be a pillar of Jewish belief, in the sense that the very fact of the existence of the world (ourselves included), is clear evidence of the reality and moral nature of God, Maimonides was ready to relinquish the concept 1 Thus in Habakkuk 1:2, 3 and Jeremiah 12:1, the prophets in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Azharos-Piyuttim Unique to Shavuos
    dltzd z` oiadl Vol. 10 No. 17 Supplement b"ryz zereay zexdf`-miheit Unique To zereay The form of heit known as dxdf` is recited only on the holiday of 1zereay. An dxdf` literary means: a warning. As a form of heit, an dxdf` represents a poem in which the author weaves into the lines of the poem references to each of the zeevn b"ixz. Why did this form of heit become associated with the holiday of zereay? Is there a link between the zexdf` and the zexacd zxyr? To answer that question, we need to ask some additional questions. Should we be reciting the zexacd zxyr as part of our zelitz each day and why do we not? In truth, we should be reciting the zexacd zxyr as part of our zelitz. Such a recital would represent an affirmation that the dxez was given at ipiq xd and that G-d’s revelation occurred at that time. We already include one other affirmation in our zelitz; i.e. z`ixw rny. The devn of rny z`ixw is performed each day for two reasons; first, because the words in rny z`ixw include a command to recite these words twice each day, jakya jnewae, and second, because the first verse of rny z`ixw contains an affirmation; that G-d is the G-d of Israel and G-d is the one and only G-d. The recital of that line constitutes the Jewish Pledge of Allegiance. Because of that, some mixeciq include an instruction to recite the first weqt of rny z`ixw out loud.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophic Homilies of Nissim of Girona - 14704
    Syllabus PHILOSOPHIC HOMILIES OF NISSIM OF GIRONA - 14704 Last update 12-09-2021 HU Credits: 2 Degree/Cycle: 2nd degree (Master) Responsible Department: Jewish Thought Academic year: 0 Semester: 1st Semester Teaching Languages: Hebrew Campus: Mt. Scopus Course/Module Coordinator: Prof. Zeev Harvey Coordinator Email: [email protected] Coordinator Office Hours: Tu 11:30-12:30 Teaching Staff: Prof Zeev Harvey page 1 / 4 Course/Module description: One of the great medieval authorities on Jewish law, Rabbi Nissim ben Reuben of Girona ( Ha-Ran, c. 1310-1376) is known for his Commentary on BT Nedarim, his Commentaries on Rabbi Isaac Alfasi's Halakhot, and his Novellae on various Talmudic tractates. However, he was also a profound and original philosophic homilist. His book of philosophic homilies, known as "Derashot Ha-Ran," had a significant influence on medieval Jewish philosophy both directly and also indirectly, through his student Rabbi Hasdai Crescas and his student's student Rabbi Joseph Albo. Course/Module aims: We shall read together one homily from Derashot Ha-Ran. In the last month of the semester, we shall discuss the papers of participants. Learning outcomes - On successful completion of this module, students should be able to: ability to analyze a medieval philosophic sermon Attendance requirements(%): 100% Teaching arrangement and method of instruction: Reading and discussion Course/Module Content: A seminar paper (about 20-25 pp.) or a short paper (about 7-10 pp.). The paper is to be submitted by the final class (11.1.22). It may be on any subject connected with Derashot Ha-Ran, and may be written in accordance with various approaches, e.g., historical, analytic, or philological.
    [Show full text]
  • Significant Persons/Founders
    Significant Persons/ Founders Historical Figures Abraham According to Jewish tradition, Abraham was born under the name Abram in the city of Ur in Babylonia in the year 1948 from Creation (circa 1800 BCE). He was the son of Terach, an idol merchant; however, from his early childhood, he questioned the faith of his father and sought the truth. He came to believe that the entire universe was the work of a single Creator, and he began to teach this belief to others. Eventually, the one true Creator that Abram had worshipped called to him and made him an offer: if Abram would leave his home and his family, then God would make him a great nation and bless him. Abram accepted this offer, and the covenant between God and the Jewish people was established. Abram was subjected to ten tests of faith to prove his worthiness for this covenant. God promised the land of Israel to Abram’s descendants. Abram was growing old and his beloved wife, Sarai, was past child-bearing years. She therefore offered her maidservant, Hagar, as a wife to Abram. (This was a common practice in the region at the time.) Hagar bore Abram a son, Ishmael, who, according to both Muslim and Jewish tradition, is the ancestor of the Arabs. When Abram was 100 and Sarai 90, God promised Abram a son by Sarai. God changed Abram’s name to Abraham (father of many), and Sarai’s to Sarah (from “my princess” to “princess”). Sarah bore Abraham a son, Isaac, who was the ancestor of the Jewish people.
    [Show full text]
  • SHEMA YISRAEL II After the First Pasuk, We Recite “Baruch Shem Kevod Malchuso Leolam Vaed - Blessed Is the Name of His Glorious Kingdom for All Eternity
    *Please respond describing if and how these Tefillah Tips are disseminated to members. Thank you* SHEMA YISRAEL II After the first pasuk, we recite “Baruch Shem Kevod Malchuso Leolam Vaed - Blessed is the Name of His glorious kingdom for all eternity. The simple understanding as to why we don’t say Baruch Shem out loud is because unlike the rest of the Shema, Baruch Shem is nowhere to be found in the written Torah and interrupts two Biblical sentences. It is however mentioned in the Talmud in tractate Pesachim 56A that our Father, Jacob said this sentence to his children before passing away (see last week’s edition). Therefore the Talmud concludes it should be said in an undertone. The Shema continues with the words “Veahavta Et Hashem Elokecha - And you shall love the Lord your G-d”. How exactly are you to express your love unto Him? “Bechol Levavecha, uvechol nafshecha, uvechol meodecha - with all of your heart, your soul, and your possessions”. The commentators ask, “How can the Torah command us to emote”?! We are commanded to don Tefillin, to eat kosher, and to observe the Shabbat, but to love G-d? Emotions are triggered and experienced but are not necessarily accessible at will. How then shall we understand - “Veahavta Et Hashem - You Shall love G-d”? HaRav Baruch HaLevi Epstein zt”l (1860-1941) in his work on the Siddur, The Baruch Sheamar advances two approaches to understanding this verse. The first approach maintains the literal translation of Veahavta – You shall love Him. He explains that the commandment of “Veahavta” must be seen in light of the previous prayer in the Siddur - “Ahava Rabbah”.
    [Show full text]
  • TEMPLE ISRAEL OP HOLLYWOOD Preparing for Jewish Burial and Mourning
    TRANSITIONS & CELEBRATIONS: Jewish Life Cycle Guides E EW A TEMPLE ISRAEL OP HOLLYWOOD Preparing for Jewish Burial and Mourning Written and compiled by Rabbi John L. Rosove Temple Israel of Hollywood INTRODUCTION The death of a loved one is so often a painful and confusing time for members of the family and dear friends. It is our hope that this “Guide” will assist you in planning the funeral as well as offer helpful information on our centuries-old Jewish burial and mourning practices. Hillside Memorial Park and Mortuary (“Hillside”) has served the Southern California Jewish Community for more than seven decades and we encourage you to contact them if you need assistance at the time of need or pre-need (310.641.0707 - hillsidememorial.org). CONTENTS Pre-need preparations .................................................................................. 3 Selecting a grave, arranging for family plots ................................................. 3 Contacting clergy .......................................................................................... 3 Contacting the Mortuary and arranging for the funeral ................................. 3 Preparation of the body ................................................................................ 3 Someone to watch over the body .................................................................. 3 The timing of the funeral ............................................................................... 3 The casket and dressing the deceased for burial ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Readings on the Encounter Between Jewish Thought and Early Modern Science
    HISTORY 449 UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA W 3:30pm-6:30 pm Fall, 2016 GOD AND NATURE: READINGS ON THE ENCOUNTER BETWEEN JEWISH THOUGHT AND EARLY MODERN SCIENCE INSTRUCTOR: David B. Ruderman OFFICE HRS: M 3:30-4:30 pm;W 1:00-2:00 OFFICE: 306b College Hall Email: [email protected] SOME GENERAL WORKS ON THE SUBJECT: Y. Tzvi Langerman, "Jewish Science", Dictionary of the Middle Ages, 11:89-94 Y. Tzvi Langerman, The Jews and the Sciences in the Middle Ages, 1999 A. Neher, "Copernicus in the Hebraic Literature from the Sixteenth to the Eighteenth Century," Journal History of Ideas 38 (1977): 211-26 A. Neher, Jewish Thought and the Scientific Revolution of the Sixteenth Century: David Gans (1541-1613) and His Times, l986 H. Levine, "Paradise not Surrendered: Jewish Reactions to Copernicus and the Growth of Modern Science" in R.S. Cohen and M.W. Wartofsky, eds. Epistemology, Methodology, and the Social Sciences (Boston, l983), pp. 203-25 H. Levine, "Science," in Contemporary Jewish Religious Thought, eds. A. Cohen and P. Mendes-Flohr, l987, pp. 855-61 M. Panitz, "New Heavens and a New Earth: Seventeenth- to Nineteenth-Century Jewish Responses to the New Astronomy," Conservative Judaism, 40 (l987-88); 28-42 D. Ruderman, Kabbalah, Magic, and Science: The Cultural Universe of a Sixteenth- Century Jewish Physician, l988 D. Ruderman, Science, Medicine, and Jewish Culture in Early Modern Europe, Spiegel Lectures in European Jewish History, 7, l987 D. Ruderman, Jewish Thought and Scientific Discovery in Early Modern Europe, 1995, 2001 D. Ruderman, Jewish Enlightenment in an English Key: Anglo-Jewry’s Construction of Modern Jewish Thought, 2000 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthodoxy in American Jewish Life1
    ORTHODOXY IN AMERICAN JEWISH LIFE1 by CHARLES S. LIEBMAN INTRODUCTION • DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF ORTHODOXY • EARLY ORTHODOX COMMUNITY • UNCOMMITTED ORTHODOX • COM- MITTED ORTHODOX • MODERN ORTHODOX • SECTARIANS • LEAD- ERSHIP • DIRECTIONS AND TENDENCIES • APPENDLX: YESHIVOT PROVIDING INTENSIVE TALMUDIC STUDY A HIS ESSAY is an effort to describe the communal aspects and institutional forms of Orthodox Judaism in the United States. For the most part, it ignores the doctrines, faith, and practices of Orthodox Jews, and barely touches upon synagogue hie, which is the most meaningful expression of American Orthodoxy. It is hoped that the reader will find here some appreciation of the vitality of American Orthodoxy. Earlier predictions of the demise of 11 am indebted to many people who assisted me in making this essay possible. More than 40, active in a variety of Orthodox organizations, gave freely of their time for extended discussions and interviews and many lay leaders and rabbis throughout the United States responded to a mail questionnaire. A number of people read a draft of this paper. I would be remiss if I did not mention a few by name, at the same time exonerating them of any responsibility for errors of fact or for my own judgments and interpretations. The section on modern Orthodoxy was read by Rabbi Emanuel Rackman. The sections beginning with the sectarian Orthodox to the conclusion of the paper were read by Rabbi Nathan Bulman. Criticism and comments on the entire paper were forthcoming from Rabbi Aaron Lichtenstein, Dr. Marshall Ski are, and Victor Geller, without whose assistance the section on the number of Orthodox Jews could not have been written.
    [Show full text]
  • B”H Introduction in Our First Article on the AOJS, We Explored Interactions
    B”H Introduction In our first article on the AOJS, we explored interactions between Rebbe and Dr. Offenbacher — its founder. In this article, we will make note of additional interactions the Rebbe had with the AOJS. While the full story of the relationship between the Rebbe and AOJS is worthy of a more detailed study, we will focus here on a few specific interactions. Dr. Cyril Domb Professor Dr. Cyril (Yechiel) Domb (5681-5772) was born in North London, England, into a Chasidic Jewish family. He was deeply affected and inspired by his grandparents who were deeply religious Jews. He, in turn, retained this deep religious feeling, was meticulous in his observance of the Mitzvos — which always took precedence over activities for professional advancement1— and spent much of his free time devoted to Talmudic studies (including attending a daily Daf Yomi Shiur). Dr. Domb led a long and fruitful career in the study of Theoretical physics and statistical mechanics, lecturing at Oxford and Cambridge Universities, King’s College, London University, Bar-Ilan University, University of Maryland, Yeshiva University, Hebrew University, Jerusalem College of Technology and the Weizmann Institute. Shortly before making aliyah to Israel, he was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society. After encountering AOJS members in 5718, during a sabbatical year at the University of Maryland2, he helped found and lead a sister organization of the AOJS in London, in 57223. In 1971, Domb became the general editor of a book series which was sponsored by the AOJS, the purpose of which was to systematically present material which could be used for Jewish education.
    [Show full text]
  • Farbrengen Has Different Types of Nisyonos, to in Connection with Gimmel Tammuz, We a Certain Extent
    Today’s generation Farbrengen has different types of nisyonos, to In connection with Gimmel Tammuz, we a certain extent. What we once called “the street” asked Rabbi Abrahams to share a few words of has managed to infiltrate our pockets and homes. inspiration for the benefit of our readers. The However, none of it is inherently new. The goal of following is a short synopsis of Rabbi Abrahams’s a Chossid is to immerse himself totally in avodas farbrengen. Hashem, in learning and davening, hafatza and so A connection to the Rebbe can be divided into on. It isn’t beyond your reach; you just need the two categories: chitzonius and pnimius. Sometimes resolve to immerse yourself within it. people, especially bochurim, ask, “How can we Being a mekushar means choosing to dedicate have a connection to the Rebbe?” oneself to the Rebbe. That is then spelled out This question is based on an assumption that in every facet of your life; you learn Chassidus by simply being in the Rebbe’s presence, one had and nigleh, engage in avodas hatefillah, learn the a real connection with him, but today, when we Rebbe’s sichos and maamarim, and involve yourself don’t see the Rebbe physically, we can’t be properly in the Rebbe’s activities. That is how you create a connected. true hiskashrus within yourself. That assumption is inherently wrong. Ultimately, this genuine hiskashrus also brings A physical relationship with the Rebbe is also with it the chitzoniusdiker trappings of a Chossid. very important, but that is totally unrelated to I often see the bochurim arriving at 770 or coming whether a person can be called a mekushar, and— to the Ohel with the same chayus and excitement more specifically—whether he fulfills his purpose that we had, when we were able to see the Rebbe; in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Metaphysics of Being in Aristotle Thales: an Analytical Study
    COMPETITIVE STRATEGY MODEL AND ITS IMPACT ON MICRO BUSINESS UNITOF LOCAL DEVELOPMENT BANKSIN JAWAPJAEE, 17 (7) (2020) The Metaphysics of Being in Aristotle Thales: An Analytical Study Marwan Ali Hussein1 1College of Education, University of Kufa, Iraq Marwan Ali Hussein . The Metaphysics of Being in Aristotle Thales: An Analytical Study - Palarch’s Journal Of Archaeology Of Egypt/Egyptology 17(7), 3713-3721. ISSN 1567-214x Keywords: Metaphysics; Being; Philosophy; Aristotle Thale. ABSTRACT The problem of existence is one of the most important problems that have plagued philosophers since ancient times. Research and studies have continued on this issue, which philosophers have made one of the main topics of philosophy in addition to the theory of knowledge and values to this day. Heidegger, for example, wonders, in the twentieth century, why was there and was not nothing? This question revealed the crisis of existence among philosophers, until a whole philosophy became stained in the twentieth century in the name of existential philosophy. Hence, this research comes to shed light on this problem through the vision of the first teacher, Aristotle, Thales.The Aristotelian vision was distinguished in the search for existence, as we find a mixture of logical research, cognitive research and natural research that was characterized by the nature of biological studies.The Aristotelian vision was also distinctive because it corrected what had been missed from previous philosophers of Aristotle, especially in the research of causes and their diversity, in addition to the fact that the evidence that Aristotle leads to prove the existence of God, which is the evidence of movement, will appear strongly in Islamic philosophy, especially among the owners of the peripheral philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Moses: God's Representative, Employee, Or Messenger
    JSIJ 14 (2018) MOSES: GOD’S REPRESENTATIVE, EMPLOYEE, OR MESSENGER?UNDERSTANDING THE VIEWS OF MAIMONIDES, NAHMANIDES, AND JOSEPH ALBO ON MOSES’ ROLE AND ULTIMATE FAILURE AT MEI MERIBAH JONATHAN L. MILEVSKY* Introduction In his Shemonah Peraqim, Maimonides refers to Moses' sin in Numbers 20as one of the “misgivings of the Torah.”1In a digression from his discussion of virtues, Maimonides explains that the sin was unrelated to the extraction of water from the rock. Instead, it was the fact that Moses, whose deeds were scrutinized and mimicked by the Israelites, acted 1Maimonides, Shemonah Peraqim, chap. 5. There are numerous ancient and medieval Jewish perspectives on how Moses and Aaron erred at Mei meribah. For the various interpretations, see Jacob Milgrom, Numbers: JPS Torah Commentary (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1990), 448.The wide variety of approaches can be attributed in part to a number of difficulties. These include the fact that it is a sin committed by the greatest of all prophets. Notice, for example how hesitant Shemuel Ben Meir is to describe Moses’ sin; making matters more difficult is the fact that Moses was not forgiven for what he did, as Joseph Albo points out, making the sin appear even more severe; also, the text bears some similarity to an incident described in the Bible in Exodus 17:6, which is why Joseph Bekhor Shor suggests that it is the same incident; further, the sin itself seems trivial. It hardly seems less miraculous for water to come from a rock when it is hit, than when it is spoken to, a point made by Nahmanides; finally, Moses pegs the sin on the Israelites in Deuteronomy 1:37.
    [Show full text]
  • Educational Management Tasks
    Transcending desire: The shaping of Christian thought by classical ideals of restraint and transcendence Ted Lynch BA, MA, DLIS, ATII(Int). # 24154113-2012 Thesis submitted for the degree Philosophiae Doctor in Church and Dogma History at the Potchefstroom Campus of the North- West University Promoter: Prof Dr J O’Hanlon Co-promoter: Prof Dr PH Fick June 2016 DEDICATION For my late father, Ted Lynch and Triestino father Nino Sterle —un abbraccione con tutta l’anima, per sempre. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Professors Joseph O‘Hanlon and Rikus Fick; Peg Evans and Tienie Buys: I can never thank you enough for your patience, solid criticism and equally solid support. Bless you all many times. Also Dean Maria Jannsen, Christchurch, Waterford; Abbado Magris, Trieste; Biblioteca del Dipartimento di Filosofia dell‗Università degli Studi di Padova: Anna Khorda; Bibliothèque Nationale de France (Morland): Justina Konin. Malina above all. Shane, Mam, Niall, Anne and Ashling. Thank you all. iii ABSTRACT Transcending sexual desire in favour of spiritual goals, while valuing the latter above the former in terms of importance and virtue, is a defining feature of early Christian theology. Some biblical scholars interpret the body and divinity in early Christianity as integrative— sublimation of sexuality was seen as liberation from the prevailing ethos of the body, or a form of promotion of the spiritual within the human dimension. By contrast, the current research will attempt to demonstrate that the symbiosis of Platonism and dualistic thought shapes the concept of sublimation in early Christian writers in a powerful and consistent way; further, the residual legacy of this continues to guide Christian perceptions and concerns on human sexuality.
    [Show full text]