DOCSLIB.ORG

Spotted Seatrout Fishery

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

GULF STATES MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION Commissioners and Proxies Alabama proxy: John Roussel Riley Boykin Smith Louisiana Department of Wildlife & Fisheries Alabama Department of Conservation & Natural P.O. Box 98000 Resources Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70898-9000 64 North Union Street Montgomery, Alabama 36130-1901 Warren Triche Louisiana House of Representatives proxy: Vernon Minton 100 Tauzin Lane Marine Resources Division Thibodaux, Louisiana 70301 P.O. Drawer 458 Gulf Shores, Alabama 36547 Frederic L. Miller P.O. Box 5098 Walter Penry Shreveport, Louisiana 71135-5098 Alabama House of Representatives 12040 County Road 54 Mississippi Daphne, Alabama 36526 Glenn H. Carpenter Mississippi Department of Marine Resources Chris Nelson 1141 Bayview Avenue, Suite 101 Bon Secour Fisheries, Inc. Biloxi, Mississippi 39530 P.O. Box 60 Bon Secour, Alabama 36511 proxy: William S. “Corky” Perret Mississippi Department of Marine Resources Florida 1141 Bayview Avenue, Suite 101 Allan L. Egbert Biloxi, Mississippi 39530 Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission 620 Meridian Street Billy Hewes Tallahassee, Florida 323299-1600 Mississippi Senate P.O. Box 2387 proxies: Roy Crabtree, Director Gulfport, Mississippi 39505 Division of Marine Resources Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission Walter J. Blessey 620 Meridian Street 1012 Beach Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1600 Biloxi, Mississippi 39530 Virginia Vail Texas Division of Marine Resources Andrew Sansom Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission Texas Parks & Wildlife Department 620 Meridian Street 4200 Smith School Road Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1600 Austin, Texas 78744 Legislative Representative to be Appointed proxies: Hal Osburn & Mike Ray Texas Parks & Wildlife Department William W. Ward 4200 Smith School Road 2221 Corrine Street Austin, Texas 78744 Tampa, Florida 33605 J.E. “Buster” Brown Louisiana Texas Senate James H. Jenkins, Jr. P.O. Box 12068 Louisiana Department of Wildlife & Fisheries Austin, Texas 78711 P.O. Box 98000 Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70898-9000 L. Don Perkins 1319 Winrock Boulevard Houston, Texas 77057 THE SPOTTED SEATROUT FISHERY OF THE GULF OF MEXICO, UNITED STATES: A REGIONAL MANAGEMENT PLAN by: Harry Blanchet Mark Van Hoose Larry McEachron Bob Muller James Warren Joe Gill Terry Waldrop Jerald Waller Charles Adams Robert B. Ditton Dale Shively Steve VanderKooy edited by: Steve VanderKooy published by: GULF STATES MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION P.O. Box 726 Ocean Springs, Mississippi 39566-0726 Publication Number 87 March 2001 A publication of the Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Admini stration Award Numbers NA26FI0026-03 and NA56FI0085. This paper is funded by a grant from th e National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The views expressed herein are those o f the aut hor(s) an d do not n ecessarily reflect th e views of NOAA or any of its sub-agencies. GULF STATES MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION Interjurisdictional Fisheries Management Program Spotted Seatrout Technical Task Force Mr. Harry Blanchet Mr. Joe Gill Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Ainsworth-MacAllan, Ltd. Fisheries 2730 Bienville Boulevard P.O. Box 98000 P.O. Box 535 Baton Rouge, LA 70898-9000 Ocean Springs, MS 39566 (504) 765-2889 (228) 872-1407 Mr. Mark Van Hoose Mr. Terry Waldrop Alabama Department of Conservation 4711 Kendal Avenue and Natural Resources Gulfport, MS 39507 P.O. Drawer 189 (228) 832-0911 Dauphin Island, AL 36528 (334) 861-2882 Major Jerald K. Waller Alabama Department of Conservation and Mr. Larry McEachron Natural Resources Texas Parks and Wildlife Department P.O. Box 189 702 Navigation Circle Dauphin Island, AL 36528 Rockport, TX 78382 (205) 861-2882 (361) 729-2328 Dr. Charles M. Adams Dr. Robert G. Muller Florida Sea Grant College Program Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation University of Florida Commission P.O. Box 110240 Florida M arine Research Institute Gainesville, FL 32611 100 Eighth Avenue, SE (352) 392-5054 St. Petersburg, FL 33701-5095 (813) 896-8626 Dr. Robert B. Ditton Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences Mr. James Warren Texas A&M U niversity University of Southern Mississippi College Station, TX 77843-2258 Institute of Marine Science (409) 845-5777 Gulf Coast Research Laboratory P.O. Box 7000 Mr. Dale Shively Ocean Springs, MS 39566-7000 Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (228) 875-4282 4200 Smith School Road Austin, TX 78744 (512) 389-4686 Staff Mr. Larry B. Simpson Executive Director Mr. Steven J. VanderKooy Mrs. Cynthia B. Yocom Program Coordinator Staff Assistant ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission (GSMFC) would like to thank the Spotted Seatrout Technical Task Force (TTF) for their many hours of work and dedication in developing this spotted seatrout fishery management plan (FMP). Special thanks are extended to Dr. Richard Leard and Mr. Jim Duffy who served as IJF Program Coordinators in 1995-1996 and 1997, respectively, for their efforts and written contributions to this document. Thanks also go to Mr. Thomas Hults who served as the commercial representative on the TTF from 1996-1997. Additional thanks go to Nancy Brown-Peterson, Mike “Buck” Buchanan, Dr. Cindy Moncreiff, and Dr. Robin Overstreet who provided both their technical expertise as well as reviewed several sections of this plan. This spotted seatrout FMP borrowed heavily from the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries management plan, “A biological and fisheries profile for Louisiana spotted seatrout, Cynoscion nebulosus” (Bourgeois et al. 1996). In addition, Section 4 [Description of the Habitat of the Stock(s) Comprising the Management Unit] relies upon information drawn from the United States Department of Commerce’s (USDOC) “Distribution and Abundance of Fishes and Invertebrates in Gulf of Mexico Estuaries Volume II: Species Life History Summaries” (Pattilo et al. 1997) and the Gulf of Mexico Fisheries Management Council’s (GMFMC) “Generic Amendment for Addressing Essential Fish Habitat Requirements” (GMFMC 1998). We recognize that these documents are excellent reviews of the literature regarding spotted seatrout in the Gulf of Mexico and wish to acknowledge the time and effort the authors invested. iii PREFACE The GSMFC was established by the Gulf States Marine Fisheries Compact under Public Law 81-66 approved May 19, 1949. Its charge was to promote the better management and utilization of marine resources in the Gulf of Mexico. The GSMFC is composed of three members from each of the five Gulf States. The head of the marine resource agency of each state is an ex officio member. The second is a member of the legislature. The third is a governor-appointed citizen with knowledge of or interest in marine fisheries. The offices of the chairman and vice chairman are rotated annually from state to state. The GSMFC is empowered to recommend to the governor and legislature of the respective states action on programs helpful to the management of marine fisheries; however, the states do not relinquish any of their rights or responsibilities in regulating their own fisheries by being members of the GSMFC. One of the most important functions of the GSMFC is to serve as a forum for the discussion of various problems and needs of marine management authorities, the commercial and recreational industries, researchers, and others. The GSMFC also plays a key role in the implementation of the Interjurisdictional Fisheries (IJF) Act. Paramount to this role are the GSMFC’s activities to develop and maintain regional FMPs for important Gulf species. The Spotted Seatrout FMP is a cooperative planning effort of the five Gulf States under the IJF Act. All members of the task force contributed by drafting individually-assigned sections. In addition, each contributed personal expertise to discussions that resulted in revisions and led to the final draft of the plan. The GSMFC made all necessaryarrangements for task force workshops. Under contract with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), the GSMFC funded travel for state agency representatives and consultants other than federal employees. Throughout this document, metric equivalents are used where ever possible with the exception of the reporting of landings data and size limits which, by convention, are always reported in English units. A glossary of fisheries terms pertinent to this FMP is provided in Appendix 14.1. Recreational landings in this document are Type A and B1 and actually represent total harvest, as designated by the NMFS. Type A catch is fish that are brought back to the dock in a form that can be identified by trained interviewers and type B1 catch is fish that are used for bait, released dead, or filleted i.e., they are killed but identification is by individual anglers. Type B2 catch is fish that are released alive again, identification is by individual anglers and are excluded from the values in this FMP. The state of Mississippi has indicated that the reported recreational landings for several near- shore, estuarine species in the MRFSS survey are under-represented due to a sampling anomaly which reports some fish caught in “state waters” as caught in the “exclusive economic zone.” The problem was addressed and corrected for the 2000 MRFSS data; however, for the purposes of this iv FMP, the recreational landings reported in Section 6 reflect the total Mississippi landings for spotted seatrout from “all waters combined” not just state waters. Recreational spotted seatrout landings for Alabama, Florida, and Louisiana are reported
Recommended publications
  • A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico And

    A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico And

    A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Coast Fishes THIRD EDITION GSMFC No. 300 NOVEMBER 2020 i Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission Commissioners and Proxies ALABAMA Senator R.L. “Bret” Allain, II Chris Blankenship, Commissioner State Senator District 21 Alabama Department of Conservation Franklin, Louisiana and Natural Resources John Roussel Montgomery, Alabama Zachary, Louisiana Representative Chris Pringle Mobile, Alabama MISSISSIPPI Chris Nelson Joe Spraggins, Executive Director Bon Secour Fisheries, Inc. Mississippi Department of Marine Bon Secour, Alabama Resources Biloxi, Mississippi FLORIDA Read Hendon Eric Sutton, Executive Director USM/Gulf Coast Research Laboratory Florida Fish and Wildlife Ocean Springs, Mississippi Conservation Commission Tallahassee, Florida TEXAS Representative Jay Trumbull Carter Smith, Executive Director Tallahassee, Florida Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas LOUISIANA Doug Boyd Jack Montoucet, Secretary Boerne, Texas Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Baton Rouge, Louisiana GSMFC Staff ASMFC Staff Mr. David M. Donaldson Mr. Bob Beal Executive Director Executive Director Mr. Steven J. VanderKooy Mr. Jeffrey Kipp IJF Program Coordinator Stock Assessment Scientist Ms. Debora McIntyre Dr. Kristen Anstead IJF Staff Assistant Fisheries Scientist ii A Practical Handbook for Determining the Ages of Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Coast Fishes Third Edition Edited by Steve VanderKooy Jessica Carroll Scott Elzey Jessica Gilmore Jeffrey Kipp Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission 2404 Government St Ocean Springs, MS 39564 and Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission 1050 N. Highland Street Suite 200 A-N Arlington, VA 22201 Publication Number 300 November 2020 A publication of the Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award Number NA15NMF4070076 and NA15NMF4720399.
  • Go Fish! Lesson Plan

    Go Fish! Lesson Plan

    NYSDEC Region 1 Freshwater Fisheries I FISH NY Program Go Fish! Grade Level(s): 3-5 NYS Learning Standards Time: 30 - 45 minutes Core Curriculum MST Group Size: 20-35 Standard 4: Living Environment Students will: understand and apply scientific Summary concepts, principles, and theories pertaining to This lesson introduces students to the fish the physical setting and living environment and families indigenous to New York State by recognize the historical development of ideas in playing I FISH NY’s card game, “Go science. Fish”. Students will also learn about the • Key Idea 1: Living things are both classification system and the external similar to and different from each other anatomy features of fish. and nonliving things. Objectives • Key Idea 2: Organisms inherit genetic • Students will be able to identify information in a variety of ways that basic external anatomy of fish and result in continuity of structure and the function of each part function between parents and offspring. • Students will be able to explain • Key Idea 3: Individual organisms and why it is important to be able to species change over time. tell fish apart • Students will be able to name several different families of fish indigenous to New York Materials • Freshwater or Saltwater Fish models/picture • Lemon Fish worksheet • I FISH NY Go Fish cards Vocabulary • Anal Fin- last bottom fin on a fish located near the anal opening; used in balance and steering • Caudal/Tail Fin- fin on end of fish; used to propel the fish • Dorsal Fin- top or backside fin on a fish;
  • Andrea RAZ-GUZMÁN1*, Leticia HUIDOBRO2, and Virginia PADILLA3

    Andrea RAZ-GUZMÁN1*, Leticia HUIDOBRO2, and Virginia PADILLA3

    ACTA ICHTHYOLOGICA ET PISCATORIA (2018) 48 (4): 341–362 DOI: 10.3750/AIEP/02451 AN UPDATED CHECKLIST AND CHARACTERISATION OF THE ICHTHYOFAUNA (ELASMOBRANCHII AND ACTINOPTERYGII) OF THE LAGUNA DE TAMIAHUA, VERACRUZ, MEXICO Andrea RAZ-GUZMÁN1*, Leticia HUIDOBRO2, and Virginia PADILLA3 1 Posgrado en Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 2 Instituto Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura, SAGARPA, Ciudad de México 3 Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México Raz-Guzmán A., Huidobro L., Padilla V. 2018. An updated checklist and characterisation of the ichthyofauna (Elasmobranchii and Actinopterygii) of the Laguna de Tamiahua, Veracruz, Mexico. Acta Ichthyol. Piscat. 48 (4): 341–362. Background. Laguna de Tamiahua is ecologically and economically important as a nursery area that favours the recruitment of species that sustain traditional fisheries. It has been studied previously, though not throughout its whole area, and considering the variety of habitats that sustain these fisheries, as well as an increase in population growth that impacts the system. The objectives of this study were to present an updated list of fish species, data on special status, new records, commercial importance, dominance, density, ecotic position, and the spatial and temporal distribution of species in the lagoon, together with a comparison of Tamiahua with 14 other Gulf of Mexico lagoons. Materials and methods. Fish were collected in August and December 1996 with a Renfro beam net and an otter trawl from different habitats throughout the lagoon. The species were identified, classified in relation to special status, new records, commercial importance, density, dominance, ecotic position, and spatial distribution patterns.
  • Helmintos Parásitos De Fauna Silvestre En Las Costas De Guerrero, Oaxaca

    Helmintos Parásitos De Fauna Silvestre En Las Costas De Guerrero, Oaxaca

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Estudios en Biodiversidad Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of 2015 Helmintos parásitos de fauna silvestre en las costas de Guerrero, Oaxaca y Chiapas, México Griselda Pulido-Flores Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, [email protected] Scott onkM s Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, [email protected] Jorge Falcón-Ordaz Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo Juan Violante-González Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biodiversidad Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Botany Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Pulido-Flores, Griselda; Monks, Scott; Falcón-Ordaz, Jorge; and Violante-González, Juan, "Helmintos parásitos de fauna silvestre en las costas de Guerrero, Oaxaca y Chiapas, México" (2015). Estudios en Biodiversidad. 6. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biodiversidad/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Estudios en Biodiversidad by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Helmintos parásitos de fauna silvestre en las costas de Guerrero, Oaxaca y Chiapas, México Griselda Pulido-Flores, Scott Monks, Jorge Falcón-Ordaz, y Juan Violante-González Resumen La costa sureste del Pacífico en México es rica en biodiversidad, en parte por la posición en la intersección de las corrientes oceánicas ecuatoriales. Sin embargo, los helmintos son un grupo de organismos que ha sido poco estudiado en la región y los registros están en diversas fuentes de información.
  • Field Identification Guide to the Sharks and Rays of the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden

    Field Identification Guide to the Sharks and Rays of the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden

    FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION GUIDE FOR FISHERY PURPOSES ISSN 1020-6868 FIELD IDENTIFICATION GUIDE TO THE SHARKS AND RAYS OF THE RED SEA AND GULF OF ADEN PERSGA FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION GUIDE FOR FISHERY PURPOSES FIELD IDENTIFICATION GUIDE TO THE SHARKS AND RAYS OF THE RED SEA AND GULF OF ADEN by Ramón Bonfil Marine Program Wildlife Conservation Society Bronx, New York, USA and Mohamed Abdallah Strategic Action Program Regional Organization for the Conservation of the Environment of the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden Jeddah, Saudi Arabia FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2004 iii PREPARATION OF THIS DOCUMENT This document was prepared under the coordination of the Species Identification and Data Programme of the Marine Resources Service, Fishery Resources and Environment Division, Fisheries Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). This field guide is largely based on material prepared for training courses on elasmobranch identification delivered in the region by the first author, and promoted by the Regional Organization for the Conservation of the Environment of the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden (PERSGA), as an activity of PERSGA’s Strategic Action Programme (SAP) towards capacity building and technical assistance in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden region. Printing was supported by Japanese Government funds. The increasing recognition of the significance of sharks and batoid fishes as ecosystem health indicators, as well as their particular importance in exploited ecosystems in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden, have been key considerations to promote the preparation of this Field Guide. Furthermore, in recent years the reported catches of elasmobranchs in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden showed a marked increase.
  • Drum and Croaker (Family Sciaenidae) Diversity in North Carolina

    Drum and Croaker (Family Sciaenidae) Diversity in North Carolina

    Drum and Croaker (Family Sciaenidae) Diversity in North Carolina The waters along and off the coast are where you will find 18 of the 19 species within the Family Sciaenidae (Table 1) known from North Carolina. Until recently, the 19th species and the only truly freshwater species in this family, Freshwater Drum, was found approximately 420 miles WNW from Cape Hatteras in the French Broad River near Hot Springs. Table 1. Species of drums and croakers found in or along the coast of North Carolina. Scientific Name/ Scientific Name/ American Fisheries Society Accepted Common Name American Fisheries Society Accepted Common Name Aplodinotus grunniens – Freshwater Drum Menticirrhus saxatilis – Northern Kingfish Bairdiella chrysoura – Silver Perch Micropogonias undulatus – Atlantic Croaker Cynoscion nebulosus – Spotted Seatrout Pareques acuminatus – High-hat Cynoscion nothus – Silver Seatrout Pareques iwamotoi – Blackbar Drum Cynoscion regalis – Weakfish Pareques umbrosus – Cubbyu Equetus lanceolatus – Jackknife-fish Pogonias cromis – Black Drum Larimus fasciatus – Banded Drum Sciaenops ocellatus – Red Drum Leiostomus xanthurus – Spot Stellifer lanceolatus – Star Drum Menticirrhus americanus – Southern Kingfish Umbrina coroides – Sand Drum Menticirrhus littoralis – Gulf Kingfish With so many species historically so well-known to recreational and commercial fishermen, to lay people, and their availability in seafood markets, it is not surprising that these 19 species are known by many local and vernacular names. Skimming through the ETYFish Project
  • Game, Fish, Furbearers, and Other Wildlife

    Game, Fish, Furbearers, and Other Wildlife

    ALABAMA REGULATIONS 2019-2020 GAME, FISH, FURBEARERS, AND OTHER WILDLIFE REGULATIONS RELATING TO GAME, FISH, FURBEARERS AND OTHER WILDLIFE KAY IVEY Governor CHRISTOPHER M. BLANKENSHIP Commissioner EDWARD F. POOLOS Deputy Commissioner CHUCK SYKES Director FRED R. HARDERS Assistant Director The Department of Conservation and Natural Resources does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, age, gender, national origin or disability in its hiring or employment practices nor in admission to, access to, or operations of its programs, services or activities. This publication is available in alternative formats upon request. O.E.O. U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. 20204 TABLE OF CONTENTS Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries Personnel: • Administrative Office .......................................... 1 • Aquatic Education ................................................ 8 • Carbon Hill Fish Hatchery ................................... 7 • Eastaboga Fish Hatchery ...................................... 7 • Federal Game Agents ............................................ 5 • Fisheries Section ................................................... 6 • Fisheries Development ......................................... 8 • Hunter Education ................................................ 11 • Law Enforcement Section ..................................... 2 • Marion Fish Hatchery ........................................... 7 • Mussel Management ............................................. 6 • Non-game Wildlife ...........................................
  • First Case of Abnormality in the Chilhuil Sea Catfish (Bagre Panamensis

    First Case of Abnormality in the Chilhuil Sea Catfish (Bagre Panamensis

    188 CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME Vol. 101, No. 3 California Fish and Game 101(3):188-192; 2015 First case of abnormality in the chilhuil sea catfish Bagre( panamensis) from Mexican waters JUAN A. MALDONADO-COYAC, OFELIA ESCOBAR-SANCHEZ*, JORGE S. RAMIREZ-PEREZ, XCHEL G. MORENO-SANCHEZ, AND DEIVIS S. PALACIOS- SALGADO Universidad Autonoma de Sinaloa-Facultad de Ciencias del Mar Paseo Claussen S/N. Col. Los Pinos, Mazatlán, Sinaloa, 82000, Mexico (JAMC, OES, JSRP). Comisionada Catedras CONACyT (OES) Instituto Politecnico Nacional (CICIMAR-IPN), Departamento de Pesquerias y Biologia Marina. Av. Instituto Politecnico Nacional s/n Col. Playa Palo de Santa Rita Apdo. Postal 592. La Paz, B. C. S., Mexico. C.P. 23096 (XGMS) Escuela Nacional de Ingenieria Pesquera (ENIP-UAN), Bahia de Matanchen Km. 12, Carretera a los Cocos San Blas, Nayarit, Mexico, C.P. 63740 (DSPS) *Correspondent: [email protected] Key words: Eye abnormalities, Ariidae, sea catfish, Gulf of California _________________________________________________________________________ The sea catfishes (Family Ariidae) include about 150 species occurring in warm- temperate to tropical continental shelves around the world. These species mainly inhabit marine and brackish waters but some are confined to freshwater (Betancur-R et al. 2007). Ten species have been recognized in the Mexican Pacific, with the chilhuil sea catfish (Bagre panamensis) being one of the most frequently caught species in the artisanal fishery that operates in the Gulf of California, Mexico (Saucedo-Barron and Ramirez-Rodriguez 1994). Overall, sea catfish are highly appreciated in the local market for their white meat, high protein content, and palatability. In Mexico, sea catfish rank 35th in terms of production (landed weight), and 27th in terms of economic revenue (total value of national fish production) out of the 58 registered marine fisheries in Mexico according to the National Commission for Fisheries and Aquaculture (Sagarpa-Conapesca 2011, Muro and Amezcua 2011).
  • Genetic Population Structure of the Spotted Seatrout (Cynoscion Nebulosus): Simultaneous Examination of the Mtdna Control Region and Microsatellite Marker Results

    Genetic Population Structure of the Spotted Seatrout (Cynoscion Nebulosus): Simultaneous Examination of the Mtdna Control Region and Microsatellite Marker Results

    Bull Mar Sci. 94(1):47–71. 2018 research paper https://doi.org/10.5343/bms.2017.1060 Genetic population structure of the spotted seatrout (Cynoscion nebulosus): simultaneous examination of the mtDNA control region and microsatellite marker results 1 Florida Fish and Wildlife Seifu Seyoum 1 * Conservation Commission, Fish 2 and Wildlife Research Institute, Richard S McBride 1 100 Eighth Avenue Southeast, Michael D Tringali St. Petersburg, Florida 33701. Vicki L Villanova 3 2 National Marine Fisheries Cecilia Puchutulegui 1 Service, Northeast Fisheries 1 Science. Center, 166 Water Samantha Gray Street, Woods Hole, Nathan Van Bibber 1 Massachusetts 02543. 3 Harris County Institute of Forensic Sciences, Forensic Genetics Laboratory, 2450 ABSTRACT.—The spotted seatrout, Cynoscion nebulosus Holcombe Boulevard, Suite 7 (Cuvier, 1830), lives almost entirely within natal estuaries, and Houston, Texas 77021. although many genetic studies identify fine-scale population structure, they do not provide a consensus as to the number * Corresponding author email: <[email protected]>. of stocks, the stock boundaries, or their connectivity. Two perceived limitations of previous studies were addressed. To address a presumption of limited sampling, we assembled a large sample size with broad geographic range: 547 specimens from 18 sampling areas (mean inter-area distance = 270 km) between Texas and North Carolina, representing the majority of this species’ range. To address the presumptive limitations of genetic markers, two genetic marker types were compared: a 335-base-pair segment of the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) control region and 38 microsatellite loci. MtDNA haplotype frequencies were different only between populations of the Gulf of Mexico (GoM) and the Atlantic Ocean, but not between the western GoM and the eastern GoM.
  • Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop, Sabah, Malaysia, July 1997

    Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop, Sabah, Malaysia, July 1997

    The IUCN Species Survival Commission Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop, Sabah, Malaysia, July 1997 Edited by Sarah L. Fowler, Tim M. Reed and Frances A. Dipper Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 25 IUCN The World Conservation Union Donors to the SSC Conservation Communications Programme and Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management: Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop, Sabah, Malaysia, July 1997 The IUCN/Species Survival Commission is committed to communicate important species conservation information to natural resource managers, decision-makers and others whose actions affect the conservation of biodiversity. The SSC's Action Plans, Occasional Papers, newsletter Species and other publications are supported by a wide variety of generous donors including: The Sultanate of Oman established the Peter Scott IUCN/SSC Action Plan Fund in 1990. The Fund supports Action Plan development and implementation. To date, more than 80 grants have been made from the Fund to SSC Specialist Groups. The SSC is grateful to the Sultanate of Oman for its confidence in and support for species conservation worldwide. The Council of Agriculture (COA), Taiwan has awarded major grants to the SSC's Wildlife Trade Programme and Conservation Communications Programme. This support has enabled SSC to continue its valuable technical advisory service to the Parties to CITES as well as to the larger global conservation community. Among other responsibilities, the COA is in charge of matters concerning the designation and management of nature reserves, conservation of wildlife and their habitats, conservation of natural landscapes, coordination of law enforcement efforts as well as promotion of conservation education, research and international cooperation.
  • Economic Impact of Recreational Fishing in Alabama Gbenga Ojumu Prairie View A&M University, Oaojumu@Pvamu.Edu

    Economic Impact of Recreational Fishing in Alabama Gbenga Ojumu Prairie View A&M University, [email protected]

    Professional Agricultural Workers Journal Volume 3 5 Number 2 Professional Agricultural Workers Journal 4-6-2016 Economic Impact of Recreational Fishing in Alabama Gbenga Ojumu Prairie View A&M University, [email protected] Diane Hite Auburn University Deacue Fields Auburn University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://tuspubs.tuskegee.edu/pawj Part of the Agricultural Economics Commons, and the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons Recommended Citation Ojumu, Gbenga; Hite, Diane; and Fields, Deacue (2016) "Economic Impact of Recreational Fishing in Alabama," Professional Agricultural Workers Journal: Vol. 3: No. 2, 5. Available at: http://tuspubs.tuskegee.edu/pawj/vol3/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Tuskegee Scholarly Publications. It has been accepted for inclusion in Professional Agricultural Workers Journal by an authorized administrator of Tuskegee Scholarly Publications. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ECONOMIC IMPACT OF RECREATIONAL FISHING IN ALABAMA *Gbenga Ojumu1, Diane Hite2, and Deacue Fields2 1Prairie View A&M University, Prairie, TX 2Auburn University, Auburn, AL Email of lead author: [email protected] Abstract Anglers’ direct mail survey data were used with IMPLAN (Impact Analysis for Planning), input- output system, to estimate the economic impact of recreational fishing in Alabama and the Alabama Black Belt. Separate economic impacts are analyzed for the Black Belt and the State; and direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts were estimated for government revenues, income, and employment. Possible increases in these impacts were also estimated for hypothetically improved recreational fishing sites, using the ‘ideal’ hypothetical site characteristics. The results showed a direct total value added impact of $102.5m; indirect impact of $24.7m, and an induced impact of $8.3m, which all add up to a total impact of $135.5m in total value added to the State.
  • Diets of Coastal Bottlenose Dolphins from the U. S. Mid

    Diets of Coastal Bottlenose Dolphins from the U. S. Mid

    MARINE MAMMAL SCIENCE, 20(3):527-545 (July 2004) 0 2004 by the Society for Marine Mammalogy DIETS OF COASTAL BOTTLENOSE DOLPHINS FROM THE U.S. MID-ATLANTIC COAST DIFFER BY HABITAT DAMONP. GANNON' DANIELLEM. WAPLES Duke University Marine Laboratory, Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Duke University, 135 Duke Marine Lab Road, Beaufort, North Carolina 28516, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT We recorded 31 species in the stomachs of 146 coastal bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatu) from North Carolina, U.S.A. Sciaenid fishes were the most common prey (frequency of occurrence = 95%). By mass, Atlantic croaker (Micropogonias undulatus) dominated the diet of dolphins that stranded inside estuaries, whereas weakfish (Cynosicon regalis) was most important for dolphins in the ocean. Inshore squid (Loligo sp.) was eaten commonly by dolphins in the ocean, but not by those in the estuaries. There was no significant pattern in prey size associated with dolphin demography, but the proportion of the diet represented by croaker was higher for males than for females, and mature dolphins ate more croaker than did juveniles. Dietary differences between dolphins that stranded in the estuaries and those that stranded on ocean beaches support the hypothesis that some members of the population inhabit the ocean primarily while others reside principally in estuaries. The overwhelming majority of prey were soniferous species (75% of numerical abundance), which is consistent with the hypothesis that bottlenose dolphins use passive listening to locate noise-making fishes. However, spatiotemporal patterns in consumption of Sciaenid fishes did not coincide with their spawning, which is when peak sound production is thought to occur.