DOCSLIB.ORG

Overview of Media Discourse Studies of Critical Discourse Analysis Desi Nori Sahputri Department of English

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Overview of Media Discourse Studies of Critical Discourse Analysis Desi Nori Sahputri Department of English Overview of Media Discourse Studies of Critical Discourse Analysis Desi Nori Sahputri Department of English. Universitas Lancang Kuning Pekanbaru, Riau, Indonesia [email protected] ABSTRACT The later 1990s and early 2000 in critical areas occurred in the field of applied linguistics. The determination of this analysis is to find out how the role of CDA in the power of media discourse studies. The devices that have been used to discover social spectacles while informative the true identity of social actors. Key word: Media Discourse, Social Actor, CDA, Power 1. Introduction Media discourse is an interesting perspective to explore, especially when objectivity, becomes the main topic- "Do media objective in their news report?: The majority of papers both media and discourse studies still asking the same question until Norv. Since the objectivity of reporting the reality in the media were so much influenced by power and ideology of the elite or the media itself. the question will always rise is stated by Hamuddin (2015) 3 identical significant researchers since the 1990s at CDA are Ruth Wodak, Teun van Dijk, and Norman Fairclough. They have dissimilar outlines of the discourse analysis theory and methods. Van Dijk contributed his first journal entitled "discourse and society" in 1990 surveyed by several related books. The critical discourse of studies has ascended before the critical analysis of the language of how and why cumulative discourse contributes to the reproduction of macrostructures and consideration to cultural and ideological touches. Especially critical to the question of power, hegemony and resistance in various fields of language, the term 'critical' in the discourse have been discussed in several ways for the use of language and the autocracy of power in society. Mahboob and Paltridge (2013) state it is important to examine the power and understand the way in which power is exercised by overloaded groups of domination. The application of CDA in the multidisciplinary field consists of various analyzes and methods (Wodak and Meyer 2003) but not cleaned for textual analysis and conversation (Van Dijk, 2009). CDA is an approach to analyze complex 'social phenomena' and requires a multi- approach (Wodak dan Meyer 2009), but Jorgensen and Philips (2002) regard the CDA as a multidisciplinary approach to analyze the relationship between "discourse and social and cultural development" across cultural domains associated with this, Fairclough (1995) argues that the purpose of the CDA explores the systematic relationship of the victim which is not clear and systematic: Social structure, broader relationships, and culture Events, techniques, and discursive practices Van Dijk (2002) approves that CDA prepositions that focus on how abuse of power, dissimilarity, and dominance are experienced in social and political interruptions. Furthermore, another originator of the CDA, Janks (1997) views CDA as a form of social practice in which critical theory is applied to analyze impervious relationships. The theory of critical theory is qualified by the CDA that discusses the language of power and power struggles that at once reveal who the original identity [enindas, while Van Dijk (2003) stated that the Critical Discourse attentions on how the mental depiction of social groups impacts social structures. The theme of the conversation can affect how a person deals with important information in text or conversation. The interdisciplinary multi-methodological approach becomes a feature of CDA, not a separate discipline. Van Dijk (2009) Represents CDA, is a combination of theory and critical applications, not critical analysis leading to (critical discourse studies). Sketches of the CDA principle objectives used in reviewing current CDA studies by Van Dijk and Wodak & Meyer (2009): CDA highlights natural assessment. the assessment as a need to explain the phenomenon under investigation provides simplicity as to why certain interpretations are more effective than others. CDA is regarded as a social research because it is critically related to the issues of understanding and understanding of human rights, the abuse of power in the realm of racism, classism, sexism and so on, and social dissimilarity. CDA is interested in unethical issues that investigate the dominant group of people who experience discursive dissimilarity. CDA is an interdisiplinary of the following theory, method and practical applications in serious problems which do not binding in the community. CDA is problem-oriented rather than focusing on a particular theory or discipline because its implications are explicitly addressed in layman's terms to society. Significant how the CDA as a critical discourse analysis method plays an important passion to expose strengths in media discourse studies is the goal of this review. Detailed objective is to scrutinize the presentation of the CDA methodology in related studies. 2. CDA Theory and Approach Different and theories presentation to CDA as expressed by Van Dijk, Wodak, and Fairclough. At the bottom presents various social models and theories to unleash ideological ideas. 3. Social Theory Of Approach This theory is language oriented because it aims to analyze social events and politics in society. in this theory, discourse is seen as a social practice that sets various entities. In fact, the power of discourse signifies different worldviews from different perspectives that lead to the emergence of ideological forces and practices in society. Fairclough (1992) The practice of language in society is a method of social practice of individual activities. this opinion is related to the power and ideology in the discourse. a social group that practices both activity and politics may be an important proposition for their social practice, this proposition contains the forces that lead to ideology. 4. Ideology Theory The basic framework in a multidisciplinary approach to organizing some ideological and consumption concepts. the ideology of controlling the thinking of social groups then representing the basic social characteristics of the group based on their identity, principles, norms, goals resources and positions (Van Dijk 1995). Perceptive and social factors are convoluted in the investing process. Social cognition is a system with shared socio-cultural knowledge existing among members of certain cultural groups and communities. for example, suffragette ideas or principles about principles such as categorizes by men, positive action and abortion. According to Jane Flax, feminist theory has several purposes: 1. To understand women’s oppression—how it evolved, how it changes over time, how it is related to other forms of oppression. 2. To understand the power differential between men and women 3. How to overcome oppression Because of that, an important component in ideological representation is the existence of our terms versus them (Van Dijk 1995). Cognitive function is the basic form of ideological traits accompanied by the experience of a person who is called a model. models parallel to cognitive function because they observe one's thoughts and personal knowledge it possesses. model is the main unit controlling the actions of human life because some ideology is found. The model is uniquely formed because it holds the ability to control the experience of a social actor (Van Dijk 1995) and influences the cognitive processes of other group members in society. 4. The Virtual Ideology Of Van Dijk The influential Van Dijk framework is known as Van Dijk's ideological plaza or conceptual square. Van Dijk put forward four principles to express ideological attitudes, these four principles are: Emphasize the positive things about them Emphasize the negative things about them Emphasize the negative things about you Emphasize the positive things about them These four play vital role in a broader contextual strategy of positive self presentation and negative other presentation. It discusses the individual’s action as a member of a group while firmly expressing various ideological nations. Positive selfrepresentation emphasizes individual’s positive behavior as in saying a positive thing about us and saying a negative thing about them. This positive deportment as in an immaterial typical of group conflict and as the interaction pattern opposes the other group (Van Dijk 2000). The negative other presentation depicts that no negative saying should be directed at us and no positive saying should be directed to them (Van Dijk 2000). This implies that the term us always refers to positive saying and beliefs in a social context while, the term them refers to negativity, criticism and other negative stands. 5. VAN DIJK SOSIOCOGNITION APPROACH Various approaches and CDA linguistic theories integrate in generating discursive and social processes to see assumptions made by the stronger on the less powerful. critical discourse studies are positions or attitudes, critical perspectives in a multidisciplinary approach because it intends to explain the secret ideology into social practice. Therefore, Van Dijk proposed triangulation of linkages between discourse, cognition and society (Van Dijk 2009). Triangulation emphasizes the cognitive phenomena associated with the structure of discourse and the ways in which dominance, social and ideology occur. To find attitudes, representations and social ideologies, the relationship between the structure of discourse and the structure of society that must be considered. Van Dijk (2009). Dijk
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Professor Dr Dr H.C. Ruth Wodak, Acss Distinguished Professor of Discourse Studies
    Professor Dr Dr h.c. Ruth Wodak, AcSS Distinguished Professor of Discourse Studies EXTENDED CURRICULUM VITAE BIO-DATA, CONTACT DETAILS, EDUCATION ............................................................................................ 2 CAREER .................................................................................................................................................... 3 VISITING PROFESSORSHIPS...................................................................................................................... 4 AWARDS .................................................................................................................................................. 5 MAJOR RESEARCH GRANTS ..................................................................................................................... 5 KEY RESEARCH INTERESTS ....................................................................................................................... 6 OTHER PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES .......................................................................................................... 7 JOURNAL EDITORSHIP ............................................................................................................................. 8 BOOK SERIES EDITORSHIP ....................................................................................................................... 9 MEMBERSHIP IN JOURNAL ADVISORY BOARDS ...................................................................................... 9 MEMBERSHIP IN BOOK
    [Show full text]
  • A Corpus-Based Critical Discourse Analysis of Pro-Eating Disorder Blogs
    Jezikoslovlje 12.2 (2011): 187-209 187 UDC 811.111'42:004.773=111 Original scientific paper Received on 15.08. 2011 Accepted for publication on 09.11. 2011 Morana Luka University of Zadar Down to the bone: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis of pro-eating disorder blogs The pro-eating-disorder community is almost exclusively an online community of individuals who claim that eating disorders are not an illness, but rather a life- style choice. This study offers an insight into the ideologies constructed in the pro-eating-disorder online discourse by using micro and macro levels of critical discourse analysis (CDA) on 19 blogs written by the self-declared members of the community. Linguistic analysis of the pro-eating-disorder discourse has been largely under-represented and this study is the first to use a corpus-linguistics ap- proach to CDA in analysing the websites’ content. The results of the analysis show that the pro-eating-disorder community constructs the ideology of eating disorders as a life-style via demedicalised reference to the illness. The study also elaborates on the construction of the negative image of “an outsider” (any person not belonging to the community) as an element of self-determination. By using the corpus linguistic technique of keyness, main topics of the discourse are identi- fied, suggesting relevant relations between the discourse of measuring and will power and the underlying pro-eating-disorder ideologies. Key words: blog; pro-eating disorder community; critical discourse analysis; demedicalisation; corpus linguistics Morana Luka: 188 A corpus-based critical discourse analysis of pro-eating disorder blogs Woe’s me, woe’s me! The earth bears grain, But I Am unfruitful, Am discarded shell, Cracked, unusable, Worthless husk.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruth Wodak, Facss
    Emeritus Distinguished Professor Dr. Dr.h.c. Ruth Wodak, FAcSS EXTENDED CURRICULUM VITAE BIO-DATA, CONTACT DETAILS, EDUCATION ............................................................................................ 2 CAREER .................................................................................................................................................... 3 VISITING PROFESSORSHIPS ..................................................................................................................... 4 AWARDS .................................................................................................................................................. 5 MAJOR RESEARCH GRANTS ..................................................................................................................... 5 KEY RESEARCH INTERESTS ....................................................................................................................... 6 OTHER PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES .......................................................................................................... 8 JOURNAL EDITORSHIP ........................................................................................................................... 10 BOOK SERIES EDITORSHIP ..................................................................................................................... 10 MEMBERSHIP IN JOURNAL ADVISORY BOARDS .................................................................................... 10 MEMBERSHIP IN BOOK SERIES EDITORIAL BOARDS
    [Show full text]
  • The Peaks and Troughs of Corpus-Based Contextual Analysis
    UCREL Corpus Research Seminar Lancaster University 23 May 2011 The peaks and troughs of corpus-based contextual analysis Costas Gabrielatos, Tony McEnery, Peter Diggle & Paul Baker (Lancaster University) Abstract This presentation addresses a criticism of corpus-based approaches to critical discourse studies, namely that the CL analysis does not take account of the relevant context, and shows how a preliminary corpus-based analysis can pinpoint salient contextual elements, which can inform both the CL and CDA analyses. The discussion also focuses on the importance of the statistical identification of diachronic trends (in particular, frequency peaks and troughs), and the need for high granularity in diachronic corpora. The paper aims to contribute to the synergy between CL and CDA approaches, and between qualitative and quantitative techniques in general. The presentation uses a recently completed ESRC-funded project as a case study, The Representation of Islam in the UK Press, which used a diachronic corpus of topic-specific articles. Periods of increased frequency in the number of corpus articles were identified through a statistical analysis. These frequency peaks indicate short periods (months) of significantly increased reporting on the topic/entities in focus. These periods can then be matched with events which are expected to have triggered the increased interest. This identification has a dual benefit: a) it suggests the contextual background against which the results of the corpus analysis can be interpreted; b) it provides a reliable guide to the corpus texts that can be usefully downsampled for close (qualitative) critical discourse analysis. Focus • Diachronic corpus studies: relevant issues – Time span – Sampling points – Granularity • Context, CDA and CL • Identifying spikes – Whole corpus vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Discourse Analysis: As an Empirical and Rational Foundation
    CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS: AS AN EMPIRICAL AND RATIONAL FOUNDATION Dewi Suriany Ali, Wendy Pandapotan Sahat [email protected], [email protected] Department of English Education Lancang Kuning University Abstract Critical discourse analysis is not related to a particular linguistic school or Discourse analysis. Discourse analysis can be used as an empirical and rational foundation to analyze it. It seeks to endorse awareness of the aspect of language implementation and to argue explicitly for change on the origin of its finding. Critical discourse analysts realize that their own work is also driven by social, economic, and political issues, but they argue that this applies to all academics of work. The traditional division of social work ensures that scientists and other academics do not have to face their workplace in a scheme of better things and conditions that make their continued work possible. Critical discourse analysts at least make their position explicit and feel they do not need to apologize for the critical attitude of their work. By contrast, by contributing to the debate on issues of great importance to society, they continue the tradition of groundless debate that has been fundamental to democratic societies since antiquity, feeling that their work as scientists requires greater responsibility than giving facts to others interpret and use. KeyTerm: Critical Discourse Analysis; Discourse-Historical Approach; Feminist Poststructural Discourse Analysis; Social Semiotics; Systemic Functional Linguistics Introduction are based on Fairclough (1989) in broad, though not necessarily entirely, drawings The nature of Critical discouse on Halliday's functional systemic analysis ( henceforth; CDA ) designed to linguistics (1985). In principle language study the role of text andtalk in creating, simultaneously builds demonstrations maintain, as well as legitimating around the world, recognizes social inequality, injustice, including oppression interaction, and scrambles these in community.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Ruth Wodak, Ph.D., Dr. H. C., Dr. Habil. CURRICULUM VITAE
    Professor Ruth Wodak, Ph.D., Dr. h. c., Dr. Habil. CURRICULUM VITAE ADDRESS: Dept. of Linguistics and Modern English Language Bowland College Lancaster University [email protected] http://www.ling.lancs.ac.uk/profiles/265 PROFESSIONAL CAREER: Since 8.12.2007 Distinguished Professor and Chair in Discourse Studies, LAEL, Lancaster University 09/2004 – 12/2007 Chair in Discourse Studies, LAEL, Lancaster University March 2005 Offer of Canadian Research Chair, University of Waterloo (not accepted) 10/1999 – 10/2002 Research Professorship, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna 03/1997 – 01/2006 Director of Research Centre "Discourse, Politics, Identity", University of Vienna 1.10. 2000 ‐ Co‐Director of Austrian National Focal Point, EUMC (since 2007 FRA), Vienna 1991 ‐ 2004 Full Professor of Applied Linguistics, Chair, University of Vienna 1991 Offer of a chair at University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA as "Full Professor" for Applied Linguistics (not accepted) 1983 – 1991 Associate Professor of Sociolinguistics and Psycholinguistics, with emphasis on Discourse Analysis, Department of Linguistics, University of Vienna, Austria 1975 – 1983 Assistant Professor of Linguistics, University of Vienna 1980 Habilitation in ‘Applied Linguistics, including Socio‐ and Psycholinguistics’, at the University of Vienna (Habilitationsschrift: Das Wort in der Gruppe. Linguistische Studien zur therapeutischen Kommunikation). Page 1 of 53 Updated 19/10/2010 1974 PhD (Sub Auspiciis Praesidentis Rei Publicae, in Linguistics, University of Vienna (PhD Thesis:
    [Show full text]
  • Discourse Studies
    Discourse Studies http://dis.sagepub.com/ Mediation between discourse and society: assessing cognitive approaches in CDA Ruth Wodak Discourse Studies 2006 8: 179 DOI: 10.1177/1461445606059566 The online version of this article can be found at: http://dis.sagepub.com/content/8/1/179 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for Discourse Studies can be found at: Email Alerts: http://dis.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://dis.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations: http://dis.sagepub.com/content/8/1/179.refs.html Downloaded from dis.sagepub.com at SAGE Publications on March 23, 2011 ARTICLE 179 Mediation between discourse and society: assessing cognitive approaches in CDA Discourse Studies Copyright © 2006 SAGE Publications. (London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi) www.sagepublications.com Vol 8(1): 179–190. RUTH WODAK 10.1177/1461445606059566 LANCASTER UNIVERSITY ABSTRACT While reviewing relevant recent research, it becomes apparent that cognitive approaches have been rejected and excluded from Critical Discourse Analysis by many scholars out of often unjustified reasons. This article argues, in contrast, that studies in CDA would gain significantly through integrating insights from socio-cognitive theories into their framework. Examples from my own research into the comprehension and comprehensibility of news broadcasts, Internet discussion boards as well as into discourse and discrimination illustrate this position. However, I also argue that there are salient limits to cognitive theories which have to be taken into account, specifically when proposing social change via rational/cognitive insights. Examples from recent political debates on immigration and from the election campaign in the US in 2004 serve to emphasize these arguments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Representation of Social Actors
    Contents Notes on contributors vii Preface xi Part I Critical discourse theory 1 On critical linguistics 3 Roger Fowler 2 Representational resources and the production of subjectivity: Questions for the theoretical development of Critical Discourse Analysis in a multicultural society 15 Gunther Kress 3 The representation of social actors 32 Theo van Leeuwen 4 Technologisation of discourse 71 Norman Fairclough 5 Discourse, power and access 84 Teun A.van Dijk Part II Texts and practices: Critical approaches 6 The genesis of racist discourse in Austria since 1989 107 Ruth Wodak 7 Ethnic, racial and tribal: The language of racism? 129 Ramesh Krishnamurthy 8 A clause-relational analysis of selected dictionary entries: Contrast and compatibility in the definitions of ‘man’ and ‘woman’ 150 Michael Hoey v vi Contents 9 The official version: Audience manipulation in police records of interviews with suspects 166 Malcolm Coulthard 10 Conflict talk in a psychiatric discharge interview: Struggling between personal and official footings 179 Branca Telles Ribeiro 11 Problems with the representation of face and its manifestations in the discourse of the ‘old-old’ 194 Dino Preti 12 ‘Guilt over games boys play’: Coherence as a focus for examining the constitution of heterosexual subjectivity on a problem page 214 Val Gough and Mary Talbot 13 Barking up the wrong tree? Male hegemony, discrimination against women and the reporting of bestiality in the Zimbabwean press 231 Andrew Morrison 14 ‘Women who pay for sex. And enjoy it’: Transgression versus morality
    [Show full text]
  • The Discourse of Politics in Action Also by Ruth Wodak
    The Discourse of Politics in Action Also by Ruth Wodak DISORDERS OF DISCOURSE (1996) GENDER AND DISCOURSE (1997) THE DISCURSIVE CONSTRUCTION OF NATIONAL IDENTITY (1999, with R. de Cillia, M. Reisigl, K. Liebhart, revised 2nd edition 2009) METHODS OF CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS (2001, with M. Meyer, revised 2nd edition 2009) EUROPEAN DISCOURSES ON UN/EMPLOYMENT (2000, with P. Muntigl, G. Weiss) DAS KANN EINEM NUR IN WIEN PASSIEREN. ALLTAGSGESCHICHTEN (2001) DISCOURSE AND DISCRIMINATION (2001, with M. Reisigl) THE HAIDER PHENOMENON IN AUSTRIA (2002, with A. Pelinka) CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS: THEORY AND INTERDISCIPLINARITY (2003, with G. Weiss, 2nd edition 2007) NATO, NEUTRALITY AND NATIONAL IDENTITY (2003, with A. Kovàcs) RE/READING THE PAST (2003, with J. Martin) A NEW AGENDA IN (CRITICAL) DISCOURSE ANALYSIS (2005, with P. Chilton, 2nd edition 2007) THE DISCURSIVE CONSTRUCTION OF HISTORY: REMEMBERING THE WEHRMACHT’S WAR OF ANNIHILATION (2008, with H. Heer, W. Manoschek, A. Pollak) QUALITATIVE DISCOURSE ANALYSIS IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES (2008, with M. Krzyzanowski)˙ LANGUAGE AND COMMUNICATION IN THE PUBLIC SPHERE (2008, with V. Koller, Handbook of Applied Linguistics vol. IV) THE POLITICS OF EXCLUSION: DEBATING MIGRATION IN AUSTRIA (2008, with M. Krzyzanowski)˙ THE EUROPEAN PUBLIC SPHERE AND THE MEDIA: EUROPE IN CRISIS (forth- coming, with A. Triandafyllidou and M. Krzyzanowski)˙ The Discourse of Politics in Action Politics as Usual Ruth Wodak Lancaster University © Ruth Wodak 2009 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2011 978-0-230-01881-5 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6-10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender, Ideology and Conceptual Metaphors: Women and the Source Domain of the Hunt
    ARTICLES Complutense Journal of English Studies ISSN: 2386-3935 https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/cjes.68355 Gender, Ideology and Conceptual Metaphors: Women and the Source Domain of the Hunt María D. López Maestre1 Abstract. As a cognitive process, metaphorical reasoning is inevitable, but not necessarily innocent or neutral. It is well known that the conceptual domains of love and sex have received substantial attention within cognitive linguistics. However, a source domain that merits further exploration from a gender ideology perspective is that of the hunt. For this reason, following an approach that links cognitive linguistics with critical discourse analysis this article examines the conceptualisation of love, seduction and the search for a partner/husband through hunting metaphors, focusing on the discursive representation of women and the hunt. In the texts studied the conceptual metaphors LOVE/SEDUCTION/THE SEARCH FOR A PARTNER OR HUSBAND IS A HUNT are activated through metaphorical linguistic expressions with terms such as hunt, chase, pursue, catch, capture, trap etc. Regarding ideology, metaphors are powerful transmitters of folk beliefs and dominant conceptions of femininity and masculinity. Gender values that show man as the privileged sex as well as sexist ideologies supportive of male dominance and female submissiveness have been found to underlie the texts under consideration. Keywords: conceptual metaphors, critical metaphor analysis, CDA, gender, ideology, hunt-based metaphors, love, seduction, the search for a partner/husband. [es] Género, ideología y metáforas conceptuales: las mujeres y el dominio fuente de la caza Resumen. Como proceso cognitivo, el razonamiento metafórico es inevitable, pero eso no quiere decir que este sea necesariamente inocente o neutral.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory, and Methodology1
    Wodak-3795-Ch-01:Wodak-3795-Ch-01.QXP 9/29/2008 4:29 PM Page 1 1 Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory, and Methodology 1 Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer CDA – What is it all about? 1 A brief history of the ‘CDA Group’ 3 The common ground: discourse, critique, power and ideology 4 Main research agenda and challenges 11 Differences and similarities – beyond the social dimension 19 Methodology 23 Summary and criticism 32 CDA – What is it all about? In this chapter, we first provide a brief ‘story’ – how it all began; then we pre - sent an overview of some important research agendas in CDA and discuss new challenges for CDA research. Secondly, we discuss the various theoretical and methodological approaches assembled in this volume from a sociological and epistemological perspective. 2 There, we focus mostly on three central and con - stitutive concepts: power, ideology and critique. We also, of course, summarize some of the salient principles which are constitutive of all approaches in CDA. In addition, we mention some important criticism which CDA has been con - fronted with in the past years (see Billig, 2003, 2008; Chilton, 2007; Chilton and Wodak, 2007; Wodak and Cillia, 2006 for an extensive discussion of this issue). The terms Critical Linguistics (CL) and Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) are often used interchangeably. In fact, recently, the term CDA seems to have been preferred and is being used to denote the theory formerly identified as CL.Therefore, we will continue to use CDA exclusively here (see Anthonissen, 2001; Chilton and Wodak, 2007 for an extensive discussion of these terms and their history).
    [Show full text]
  • Othering Others: Right-Wing Populism in UK Media Discourse on “New” Immigration Grace E
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications: Department of Teaching, Department of Teaching, Learning and Teacher Learning and Teacher Education Education 2017 Othering others: Right-wing populism in UK media discourse on “new” immigration Grace E. Fielder University of Arizona, [email protected] Theresa Catalano University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/teachlearnfacpub Part of the Communication Technology and New Media Commons, Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Gender, Race, Sexuality, and Ethnicity in Communication Commons, International and Intercultural Communication Commons, Mass Communication Commons, Social Influence and Political Communication Commons, Speech and Rhetorical Studies Commons, and the Teacher Education and Professional Development Commons Fielder, Grace E. and Catalano, Theresa, "Othering others: Right-wing populism in UK media discourse on “new” immigration" (2017). Faculty Publications: Department of Teaching, Learning and Teacher Education. 255. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/teachlearnfacpub/255 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Teaching, Learning and Teacher Education at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications: Department of Teaching, Learning and Teacher Education by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published (as Chapter 9) in Representing the Other in European Media Discourses, ed. Jan Chovanec and Katarzyna Molek-Kozakowska (Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2017), pp. 207–234. doi 10.1075/dapsac.74.10fie digitalcommons.unl.edu Copyright © 2017 John Benjamins Publishing Company. Used by permission. Othering others Right-wing populism in UK media discourse on “new” immigration Grace E.
    [Show full text]