DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Report Accounting for Commercial Vehicles in Urban Transportation Models

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Report Accounting for Commercial Vehicles in Urban Transportation Models Accounting for Commercial Vehicles in Urban Transportation Models Task 3: Magnitude and Distribution final report prepared for Federal Highway Administration prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with Dr. Harry Cohen Dr. Arun Chatterjee November 2003 www.camsys.com final report Accounting for Commercial Vehicles in Urban Transportation Models Task 3: Magnitude and Distribution prepared for Federal Highway Administration prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 100 Cambridge Park Drive, Suite 400 Cambridge, Massachusetts 02140 with Dr. Harry Cohen Dr. Arun Chatterjee November 2003 Accounting for Commercial Vehicles in Urban Transportation Models Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 1 Types of Commercial Vehicles.............................................................................. 2 Data Sources ............................................................................................................ 3 Magnitude and Distribution ................................................................................. 4 Next Steps ................................................................................................................ 5 1.0 Introduction .........................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Purpose.........................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Approach .....................................................................................................1-2 1.3 Outline of Report ........................................................................................1-3 2.0 Types of Commercial Vehicles.........................................................................2-1 2.1 Definitions ...................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Categories ....................................................................................................2-4 3.0 Data Sources ........................................................................................................3-1 3.1 Commercial Vehicle Surveys ....................................................................3-1 3.2 Vehicle Registration..................................................................................3-16 3.3 Vehicle Count Data...................................................................................3-24 3.4 Other Data Sources...................................................................................3-28 3.5 Individual Contacts ..................................................................................3-38 4.0 Magnitude and Distribution ............................................................................4-1 4.1 Analysis by Commercial Vehicle Category and Urban Area...............4-1 4.2 Aggregated Categories ............................................................................4-11 4.3 Analysis by Time Period..........................................................................4-12 4.4 Analysis by Facility Type ........................................................................4-14 5.0 Next Steps.............................................................................................................5-1 5.1 Data Gaps.....................................................................................................5-1 5.2 Priorities for Modeling...............................................................................5-2 Cambridge Systematics, Inc. i 6820.F44 Table of Contents, continued Appendix A Paratransit Trips..................................................................................................A-1 Appendix B Largest 100 School District Bus Fleets in 2000 ................................................ B-1 Appendix C Taxi Data from Fact Book 2002 (Taxicab Division)..........................................C-1 Appendix D Airport Surveys...................................................................................................D-1 Appendix E FHWA Vehicle Classification Tables ............................................................... E-1 ii Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 6820.F44 Accounting for Commercial Vehicles in Urban Transportation Models List of Tables Table 1.1 Urban Areas Used in the Evaluation of Commercial Vehicle Travel.............................................................................................1-2 Table 2.1 Old and New Categories..........................................................................2-5 Table 2.2 VIUS Body Type by 12 Categories..........................................................2-6 Table 2.3 Light Duty Categories in California DMV Database............................2-8 Table 2.4 Medium and Heavy Duty Categories in California DMV Database...........................................................................................2-8 Table 3.1 Number of Vehicles by Body Type and Vehicle Size...........................3-2 Table 3.2 Number of Vehicles within MSAs in Selected States ...........................3-3 Table 3.3 Daily Vehicle Miles Traveled in MSAs by Commercial Vehicle Category .......................................................................................3-4 Table 3.4 Average Daily VMT per Vehicle in MSAs by Commercial Vehicle Category .......................................................................................3-4 Table 3.5 Number of Days in a Year Used for VMT Calculations.......................3-5 Table 3.6 Atlanta Expansion Factors .......................................................................3-6 Table 3.7 Atlanta Commercial Vehicle Categories ................................................3-7 Table 3.8 Atlanta Expanded Survey Data...............................................................3-8 Table 3.9 Denver Survey Excluded Businesses and Vehicle Types ....................3-9 Table 3.10 Denver Commercial Vehicle Categories ..............................................3-10 Table 3.11 Denver Expanded Survey Data.............................................................3-11 Table 3.12 Detroit Commercial Vehicle Categories...............................................3-12 Table 3.13 Detroit Expanded Survey Data .............................................................3-13 Table 3.14 Piedmont-Triad Commercial Vehicle Categories ...............................3-15 Table 3.15 Triad Expanded Survey Data ................................................................3-16 Table 3.16 DMV California Data Summary for the San Francisco MSA ............3-19 Table 3.17 DMV California Data Summary for the Los Angeles MSA...............3-19 Table 3.18 DMV California Data Summary for the San Diego MSA ..................3-20 Table 3.19 DMV California Data Summary for the Sacramento MSA ...............3-21 Table 3.20 Registration Type Data Available from Polk.......................................3-23 Cambridge Systematics, Inc. iii List of Tables, continued Table 3.21 Highway Statistics Estimates of Population and VMT for Selected Cities ..........................................................................................3-24 Table 3.22 Vehicle Miles Traveled from Different Data Sources.........................3-25 Table 3.23 Vehicle Miles Traveled by Vehicle Type for Selected Urban Areas .............................................................................................3-26 Table 3.24 Vehicle Miles Traveled by Functional Class for Selected Urban Areas .............................................................................................3-27 Table 3.25 Paratransit Trips Statistics......................................................................3-29 Table 3.26 Public Package, Product and Mail Delivery Statistics........................3-30 Table 3.27 School District Statistics.........................................................................3-32 Table 3.28 Taxi Statistics............................................................................................3-33 Table 3.29 Taxi Data by City.....................................................................................3-34 Table 3.30 Summary of the Airport Access Mode Split........................................3-35 Table 3.31 Summary of Shuttle Service Airport Access Vehicle Trips and Miles Traveled..................................................................................3-37 Table 3.32 Summary of Taxi Airport Access Vehicle Trips and Miles Traveled..................................................................................3-37 Table 3.33 Summary of Rental Car Airport Access Vehicle Trips and Miles Traveled..................................................................................3-38 Table 3.34 School Bus Statistics from Individual Contacts ..................................3-40 Table 3.35 Public Works Department Statistics from Individual Contacts........3-40 Table 3.36 Sample Towing Truck Statistics from Individual Contacts...............3-41 Table 3.37 Comparison with Other Data Sources..................................................3-42 Table 4.1 Fleet Sizes ...................................................................................................4-2 Table 4.2 Average Trip Length in Miles..................................................................4-3 Table 4.3 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT).................................................................4-4
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Work Trucks.Pdf
    KENWORTH THE World’s BEST WORK TRUCKS HIGH VALUE • REAL-WORLD • SOLUTIONS From the beginning, Kenworth trucks have been custom engineered to tackle demanding applications and operating conditions. In the real world, few things work as well – options in the industry; front axles to 40,000 as reliably, as efficiently, as productively – as lbs., rears to 150,000 lbs.; pushers and tags; a Kenworth truck. Whether it’s pulling 500 engines to 625 hp; double-inserted frames; tons across the scorching deserts of Saudi front-drive axles; tandem front axles, tridem Arabia. Hauling copper ore at air-starved rear drives; sheet metal hoods, brush guards, altitudes in the Andes. Or operating in the and skid plates for severe service; front and frozen north slope of Alaska where you never rear engine-mounted PTOs and transmission- shut off the engine. • It takes confidence mounted PTOs; tire sizes to 29.5 x 25.25 • If and decades of experience to custom build – and you need a rugged-duty, all-business truck you support – specialized trucks like these. It also can count on, count on Kenworth. It’s your high takes the most extensive list of factory-installed value – real world – solution. DUMP TRUCKS With all the back-breaking experience Kenworths have withstood the world over, you can bet this is the ideal truck for less-than-ideal conditions. Kenworth knows how to build trucks that can shoulder maximum payload with minimum tare weight and move that burden with sure-footed confidence over steep, uneven and slippery job sites. • Your truck starts as a clean sheet of paper, its wheelbase custom tailored to your job and local regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Dump Trucks Dump Trucks
    DDUMPUMP TTRUCKSRUCKS s a leader in Mechanical , Railroad, Maintenance Aof Way, Track Maintenance, Environmental, Transfer and Load Adjustment, Maintenance and Disaster Response services, Hulcher Services maintains a fleet of heavy equipment including dump trucks. Hulcher’s dump trucks have a capacity of 8-22 cubic yards. They can be deployed independently or in conjunction with other Hulcher equipment, like the excavator, wheel loader, track loader and telehandler. Some projects our dump trucks are used for include: • Performing grade stabilization • Trenching, culvert or ditch work • Removing driftwood from railroad bridge abutments • Railroad bridge maintenance • Railroad backhoe services • Railroad crossing construction • Derailment support • Demolition of structures • Flood response clean-up • Snow removal • Hurricane, tornado and storm response • Bulk transfer services • Load transfers and load reductions / adjustments • Post-spill clean-up services The dump truck is frequently deployed as part of a backhoe / dump truck combo package. This combination of one operator and two pieces of equipment provides the right capabilities for the project while maximizing value for the customer. When your Load Transfer / Load Adjustment Services project calls for equipment that is properly equipped, expertly operated and available when you need it, call Hulcher at 800-637-5471. Hulcher Services Inc. • 611 Kimberly Drive • Denton, TX 76208 800-637-5471 • www.Hulcher.com BBACKHOESACKHOES he critical element in choosing the right contractor Tfor railroad work is the operator’s expertise. Hulcher Services’ professional backhoe operators are railroad specialists. They have received training in railroad applications, are current in safety and security certification requirements for all Class 1 railroads, and have spent years perfecting their craft in maintenance- of-way environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Chassis Layout of an Autonomous Truck a Transportation Concept for the Mining Industry
    Chassis Layout of an Autonomous Truck A Transportation Concept for the Mining Industry Johannes Dahl Gabriél-André Grönvik Mechanical Engineering, masters level 2016 Luleå University of Technology Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics Preface This thesis was performed by Johannes Dahl and Gabriél-André Grönvik at Scania. Johannes was studying Mechanical Engineering at Luleå University of Technology and has experience in product development and great knowledge in machine design and components. Gabriél was studying Vehicle Engineering at KTH and has competence in vehicle concepts, components and dynamics. The authors want to thank the supervisors Jenny Jerrelind at KTH, Torbjörn Lindbäck at LTU and Måns Lundberg at Scania for their support and advices. We also want to thank other personnel at Scania; our boss Christian Lauffs, Eric Falkgrim and Jan Dellrud for running this project, Mikael Wågberg and Daniel Bergqvist for sharing their expertise about the mining industry and everyone that we have been in contact with at Scania for exchanging many great ideas. Finally, we want to thank all staff at RTMX for great support, good advice and involvement. I II Abstract Autonomous driving might increase safety and profitability of trucks in many applications. The mining industry, with its enclosed and controlled areas, is ideal for early implementation of autonomous solutions. The possibility of increased productivity, profitability and safety for the mining industry and the mining area as a ground for development could, through collaboration, result in many benefits for both mining companies and truck manufactures. Scania must investigate how these autonomous vehicles should be constructed. The project goal is thereby to develop a chassis layout concept for an autonomous truck.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendations for Evaluating & Implementing Proximity Warning
    /-~,/-,< ,, --!~~(; ,t\f Workplace Safety and Health Recommendations for Evaluating & Implementing Proximity Warning Systems on Surface Mining Equipment Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health ~/OSH (J ~ r/- CcJ,,(,1/tf - 7-::?_ Report of Investigations 9672 Recommendations for Evaluating and Implementing Proximity Warning Systems on Surface Mining Equipment T. Ruff DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Spokane Research Laboratory Spokane, WA June 2007 This document is in the public domain and may be freely copied or reprinted. DISCLAIMER: Mention of any company or product does not constitute endorsement by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). In addition, citations to Web sites external to NIOSH do not constitute NIOSH endorsement of the sponsoring organizations or their programs or products. Furthermore, NIOSH is not responsible for the content of these Web sites. ORDERING INFORMATION To receive documents or other information about occupational safety and health topics, contact NIOSH at NIOSH-Publications Dissemination 4676 Columbia Parkway Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998 Telephone: 1-800-35-NIOSH Fax: 513-533-8573 e-mail: [email protected] or visit the NIOSH Web site at www.cdc.gov/niosh DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2007-146 July 2007 SAFER • HEALTHIER • PEOPLE™ Contents Abbreviations .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Fuel News, Volume 6, Number 3
    Vol. 6 - No. 3 U. S. DEPA R T MENT of ENERGY An Official Publication of the Clean Cities Network and the Alternative Fuels Data Center From the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy A LTERNATIVE F UELS A CROSS A MERICA SUCCESS STORIES FROM EVERY STATE PLUS: INSIDE: Sales Success Tips for AFV Dealers Cummins Westport Drives Progress CMAQ Funding on Long Island Dear Readers: Mark Twain said, “Facts are stubborn, but statistics are more pliable.” The Clean Cities Program is defined by two very clear facts: By 2010 we will have 1 million AFVs on the road and we will be displacing 1 billion gallons of petroleum annually. As 2003 dawns, so does the realization that we have seven years to meet these ambitious goals. So, where are we and how are we going to get there? The pliability of statistics aside, it’s becoming increasingly clear that we have to get serious about documenting the impact that AFVs have on petroleum displacement. The first goal articu­ lated in the new strategic plan of the Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Office of the Department of Energy is to “Dramatically Reduce, or Even End, Dependence on Foreign Oil.” That alone is a compelling reason to show the impact that Clean Cities coalitions and stake- holders have had across the country. Equally significant, though, is using statistics to strategically determine where our potential market growth is both by geography and niche markets. Two noteworthy developments are in the works that will help us more accurately capture fuel and vehicle sales.
    [Show full text]
  • Purchase of a Peterbilt Dump Truck and a Ford F450 Truck for the Public Works Agency for 2022 Date: June 28, 2021
    Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council CC: Members of Administration and Public Works Committee From: Sean Ciolek, Facilities & Fleet Management Div. Manager CC: Luke Stowe, CIO/Administrative Services Director Susie Hall, Management Analyst Subject: Purchase of a Peterbilt Dump Truck and a Ford F450 Truck for the Public Works Agency for 2022 Date: June 28, 2021 Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council approval to purchase a Peterbilt Model 348 tandem axle radius dump body (RDS) truck for use in Public Works Agency/Streets Division operations from JX Truck Center (PO Box 189, Wadsworth, IL 60083) through a Sourcewell contract for $225,942.00. In addition, staff recommends approval for the purchase of a Ford F450 truck for use in the Public Works Agency/Greenways Division operations from Currie Commercial Center (10125 W Laraway, Frankfort, IL 60423) through a Sole Source contract for $95,036.00. The equipment being replaced has been subjected to the most wearing conditions and operations. It is anticipated to require increased repair/maintenance costs, especially now since they are approaching the end of their useful life. Purchases must be approved well in advance so that the long lead time builds will be complete for delivery in 2022. Funding Source: Funding for the purchase will be from the 2022 Equipment Replacement Fund (Account 601.19.7780.65550) with an estimated FY22 budget of $2,000,000 - contingent on approval from the city council for FY2022. Council Action: For Action Summary: Facilities & Fleet Management staff carefully weigh multiple variables to replace and repurpose vehicles accordingly.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Gas in Transit Fleets: a Review of the Transit Experience
    February 2002 • NREL/TP-540-31479 Natural Gas in Transit Fleets: A Review of the Transit Experience Leslie Eudy National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 NREL is a U.S. Department of Energy Laboratory Operated by Midwest Research Institute • Battelle • Bechtel Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 February 2002 • NREL/TP-540-31479 Natural Gas in Transit Fleets: A Review of the Transit Experience Leslie Eudy Prepared under Task No. FU23.5620 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 NREL is a U.S. Department of Energy Laboratory Operated by Midwest Research Institute • Battelle • Bechtel Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. Available electronically at http://www.osti.gov/bridge Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors, in paper, from: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Tucson Smart City Demonstration Proposal Part 1: Vision Narrative
    Tucson Smart City Demonstration Proposal Part 1: Vision Narrative February 4, 2016 Table of Contents 1 Smart City Vision 1 7 Tucson Smart City Team 14 A. Existing Challenges and Proposed Solutions 1 A. Partners and Key Stakeholders 14 B. Program Management, Implementation,and Operation, and B. Governance Processes 14 Approach 2 C. Existing and Potential Public-Private-Partnerships 17 C. Tuscon Smart City Challenge Organizational Chart 3 8 Existing Transportation Infrastructure and Features 18 2 Tucson is an Ideal Smart City Candidate: Population 9 Data Collection, Use, and Policies 19 Characteristics 4 A. Data Currently Collected by the City of Tucson 19 3 Tucson is an Ideal Smart City Candidate: Additional B. How Data Will Be Used and Integrated Across Departments to Characteristics 5 Address City’s Challenges 21 A. Robust Public Transportation System with Frequent Service 5 C. Existing Policies Applicable to Data Collected 22 B. Tucson has a Conducive Demonstration Environment 6 D. Data Collection, Management, and Sharing 23 C. Tucson has Committed and Steadfast Leadership 6 E. How Data from Outside Organizations and Interests will be D. Tucson’s Smart City will be Deeply Integrated with Collected, Managed, and Shared Across Sectors the Sharing Economy 6 or with the Public 23 E. Smart City Data will be Accessible, Discoverable, and Usable 6 F. Terms and Conditions 24 4 Preliminary Site Map 7 10 Approach for Use of Existing Standards, Architecture, A. Selection of Demonstration Area 7 and Certification Processes 25 B. Proposed Technology Solutions 8 11 Smart City Goals, Objectives, and Performance 5 The Tucson Smart City Vision 9 Measures 27 A.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Model 567 Operators Manual
    MODEL 567 Contents Safety..................................... 1 Emergency..................................... 2 Controls..................................... 3 Driving..................................... 4 Maintenance..................................... 5 Information..................................... 6 Contents © 2021 PACCAR Inc. - All Rights Reserved This manual illustrates and describes the operation of features or equipment which may be either standard or optional on this vehicle. This manual may also include a description of features and equipment which are no longer available or were not ordered on this vehicle. Please disregard any illustrations or descriptions relating to features or equipment which are not on this vehicle. PACCAR reserves the right to discontinue, change specifications, or change the design of its vehicles at any time without notice and without incurring any obligation. The information contained in this manual is proprietary to PACCAR. Reproduction, in whole or in part, by any means is strictly prohibited without prior written authorization from PACCAR Inc. SAFETY - 1 Chapter 1 | SAFETY Using this Manual..................................................................................................................................6 Safety Alerts..........................................................................................................................................6 Illustrations............................................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Personnel Equipment
    STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP NUMBER: ISSUE DATE: TOWN OF WEST NEWBURY 6/27/2019 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROGRAM: Snow Removal and De-Icing PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: Wayne S. Amaral – Director of Public Works MA SMALL MS4 PERMIT REQUIREMENT SUMMARY: Part 2.3.7.a.iii.5. The permittee shall establish and implement procedures for winter road maintenance including the use and storage of salt and sand; minimize the use of sodium chloride and other salts, and evaluate opportunities for use of alternative materials; and ensure that snow disposal activities do not result in disposal of snow into waters of the United States. For purposes of this MS4 Permit, salt shall mean any chloride-containing material used to treat paved surfaces for deicing, including sodium chloride, calcium chloride, magnesium chloride, and brine solutions. Personnel The following personnel are responsible for snow and ice removal. Employees performing the procedures in this SOP shall attend yearly stormwater pollution prevention training. TABLE 1 Name Responsibility Wayne S. Amaral Director Richard Hills Snow Plow and Salter Truck Driver Tom Costa Snow Plow and Salter Truck Driver John Spalding Snow Plow and Salter Truck Driver John Savage Facilities – Snow and Ice Clearing Mark Marlowe Snow Plow Driver Brian Richard Snow Plow and Salter Truck Driver Equipment West Newbury owns and maintains ice control and snow removal equipment listed in Table 2. Equipment maintenance shall be conducted consistent with the vehicle maintenance and operation owner’s manual. The wash bay/ area is located at the DPW Garage at 693 Main Street, West Newbury. Plowing When conditions warrant, plows are installed on the three larger trucks to move snow from the traveled roadway.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Commercial Vehicle Covering and Cargo Control Laws
    1 2015 U.S. AND CANADA Guide to Commercial Vehicle Covering and Cargo Control Laws Tarp Association INDUSTRIAL FABRICS ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL IFAI.com Guide to Commercial Vehicle Covering and Cargo Control Laws US and Canada Covering Laws Cargo Securement Rules Published by the Tarp Association A division of the Industrial Fabrics Association International 1801 County Rd B W Roseville MN 55113-4061 USA Phone: 800 225 4324 or + 1 651 222 2508 Fax: +1 651 631 9334 Tarp Association – Mission Statement To identify, promote and enhance the common interests of Tarp Association members. Tarp Association – Who we are The IFAI Tarp Association represents manufacturers of truck tarps and covers, agricultural tarps and covers, daily waste tarps, field covers and gym floor tarps. The Division monitors state and federal covering laws and creates new business opportunities by promoting the use of tarps at trade shows throughout the year. IFAI Expo Anaheim, CA October 6-9, 2015 IFAI Expo visits sunny southern California with its premier textile trade show event, featuring: The broadest marketplace connecting thousands of attendees with more than 400 exhibitors Global connections and networking through events, education and meetings Comprehensive programming to generate ideas, provide solutions and promote business growth Numerous experiences showcasing the breadth and innovation of the industry 1 © 2015 Industrial Fabrics Association International Page Table of Contents Introduction....................... 3 Covering Laws.................... 4-113 United States and Puerto Rico Alabama.............................. 4-6 Oregon................................ 72 Alaska................................. 7 Pennsylvania...................... 73-74 Arizona............................... 8 Rhode Island...................... 75 Arkansas............................. 9 South Carolina................... 76-77 California............................ 10-11 South Dakota...................... 78 Colorado............................
    [Show full text]
  • Nonstandardized Bus Fleets
    IO Ni W LtC-WPE RIER EEI&1LD~IEE LPLE iTjøGR& Nonstandardized Bus Fleets [NATIONAO RESEARCjOUNCIL WN TRANSPORTATIQN RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COM!TTEE 1990 OFFICERS Chairman: Wayne Mur,. Chief Engineer, Missouri Highway & Transportation Department Vice Chairman: C. Michael Walton, Bess Harris Jones Centennial Professor and Chairman, College of Engineering. The University of Texas at Austin Executive Director: Thomas B. Deen, Transportation Research Board MEMBERS JAMES B. BUSEY IV, Federal Aviation Administrator, US. Department of Transportation (ex officio) GILBERT E. CARMICHAEL, Federal Railroad Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex OffiCIO) BRIAN W. CLYMER, Urban Mass Transportation Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio) JERRY R. CURRY, National Highway Traffic Safety Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio) FRANCIS B. FR.ANcoIs, Executive Director, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (ex officio) JOHN GRAY, President, National Asphalt Pavement Association (ex officio) THOMAS H. HANNA, President and Chief Executive Officer, Motor Vehicle Manufacturers 'Association of the United States. Inc. (ex officio) HENRY 3. HATCH, Chief of Engineers and Commander. U.S. Army corps of Engineers (ex officio) THOMAS D. LARSON, Federal Highway Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio) GEORGE H. WAY, JR., Vice President for Research and Test Department, Association of American Railroads (ex officio) ROBERT J. AARONSON, President, Air Transport Association of America JAMES M. BEGGS, Chairman, Spacehab, Inc. ROBERT N. BOTHMAN, Director, Oregon Department of Transportation J. RON BRINSON, President and chief Executive Officer, Board of Commissioners of The Port of New Orleans L. GARY BYRD, Consulting Engineer, Alexandria, Virginia L. STANLEY CRANE, Retired, Forner Chairman & chief Executive Officer, Consolidated Rail Corporation RANDY DOI, Director, IVHS Systems Motorola Incorporated EARL DOVE, President, Earl Dove Company LOUIS J.
    [Show full text]