DOCSLIB.ORG

Overview of the Impact of Mining on the Zambezi And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Overview of the Impact of Mining on the Zambezi And MINING, MINERALS AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, SOUTHERN AFRICA AN OVERVIEW OF THE IMPACT OF MINING AND MINERAL PROCESSING OPERATIONS ON WATER RESOURCES AND WATER QUALITY IN THE ZAMBEZI, LIMPOPO AND OLIFANTS CATCHMENTS IN SOUTHERN AFRICA Peter Ashton 1, David Love 2, Harriet Mahachi 3 and Paul Dirks 3 1 CSIR-Environmentek, P.O. Box 395, Pretoria 0001, South Africa 2 Geology Department 3 Mineral Resources Centre University of Zimbabwe, PO Box MP167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe WATER ENVIRONMENT & FORESTRY TECHNOLOGY MINERAL RESOURCES CENTRE GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT UNIVERSITY OF ZIMBABWE UNIVERSITY OF ZIMBABWE August 2001 MINING, MINERALS AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, SOUTHERN AFRICA AN OVERVIEW OF THE IMPACT OF MINING AND MINERAL PROCESSING OPERATIONS ON WATER RESOURCES AND WATER QUALITY IN THE ZAMBEZI, LIMPOPO AND OLIFANTS CATCHMENTS IN SOUTHERN AFRICA COPYRIGHT RESERVED This technical report documents an assignment that was carried out for the Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development (SOUTHERN AFRICA) Project [MMSD(SA)] and remains the property of MMSD(SA). However, the intellectual property and insights acquired during the execution of this assignment remain vested in the authors of this report. No part of this report may be reproduced in any manner without written permission from MMSD(SA). When used as a reference, this report should be cited as: Ashton, P.J., D. Love, H. Mahachi, P.H.G.M. Dirks (2001). An Overview of the Impact of Mining and Mineral Processing Operations on Water Resources and Water Quality in the Zambezi, Limpopo and Olifants Catchments in Southern Africa. Contract Report to the Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development (SOUTHERN AFRICA) Project, by CSIR- Environmentek, Pretoria, South Africa and Geology Department, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe. Report No. ENV-P-C 2001-042. xvi + 336 pp. ii AN OVERVIEW OF THE IMPACT OF MINING AND MINERAL PROCESSING OPERATIONS ON WATER RESOURCES AND WATER QUALITY IN THE ZAMBEZI, LIMPOPO AND OLIFANTS CATCHMENTS IN SOUTHERN AFRICA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The original Terms of Reference for this study (Research Topic 4) were extremely broad and required an overview of all mining impacts on the biophysical environment throughout southern Africa. Though this objective was desirable, and would provide an excellent background for management strategies in each of the SADC countries, it was unrealistic in view of the time and budget constraints. Therefore, the main focus of this research topic was restricted to water resources, in particular water quality, and attention confined to three key river basins, namely the Zambezi, Limpopo and Olifants basins. Whilst the revised Terms of Reference remain challenging, they represent a compromise that enabled a useful body of work to be produced. The Project Team who conducted the investigation and report writing for Research Topic 4 comprised the following individuals: • Dr Peter Ashton – CSIR-Environmentek, South Africa – Research Co-ordinator and Project Manager; • Mr David Love – Mineral Resources Centre, University of Zimbabwe – Principal Investigator; • Professor Paul Dirks – Mineral Resources Centre, University of Zimbabwe – Project Supervisor and Reviewer (Zimbabwe sector); and • Ms Harriet Mahachi – Mineral Resources Centre, University of Zimbabwe – Assistant Investigator. This report provides an overview of the impacts that mining and mineral processing activities have had, or are likely to have, on the water resources (in particular, water quality aspects) of the Zambezi, Limpopo and Olifants river basins. The report is the output of a collaborative research process involving scientists from CSIR- iii Environmentek, South Africa, and the Mineral Resources Centre of the University of Zimbabwe, and forms part of the MMSD SOUTHERN AFRICA project. The report has been structured into eight sections to provide a logical framework for synthesis of the information and to facilitate transfer of insights, conclusions and recommendations to stakeholders. The different types of typical chemical and physical impacts associated with diverse mining and mineral processing operations are described to provide an overview of the specific types of impacts that are normally associated with the mining or processing of specific minerals. In several cases, it was difficult to determine the specific impact exerted by a mining operation, because the impact(s) also depended on the degree of management control exerted during mining. Based on defined criteria, the impacts of mining and mineral processing operations were classified into high, medium and low impacts. These descriptors were then used to describe the scale and variety of impacts linked to mining activities in each of the sub-catchments. Within the time and budget constraints of this Research Topic, it was not possible to collect high quality quantitative data for each of the three river basins. Indeed, it was difficult to obtain water quality data for Botswana, Malawi, Mozambique and Zambia and there was some sensitivity regarding possible misinterpretation of the few data available for South Africa and Zimbabwe. Nevertheless, despite these constraints, it was possible to estimate the extent and variety of historical and current mining and mineral processing operations within each sub-catchment for each river basin. This information allowed the Project Team to derive qualitative or semi-quantitative estimates of the probable extent of any impacts on water resources and water quality, based on existing information and professional judgement. These were described briefly in terms of both their potential severity and the spatial scale of the area they would be likely to affect. In addition to this system of qualitative descriptions, attention was also paid to evaluating whether or not a series of impacts within a single sub-catchment could interact or combine to exert a greater, cumulative effect on water resources and water quality. In some cases, the cumulative effect of a group of otherwise relatively “low-” or “medium-scale” impacts from individual mines in a single catchment can be seen as a dramatic increase in both the severity and extent of adverse impacts exerted on catchment water resources and other water users. In such cases, remediation often requires concerted management attention from the mines concerned, as well as the relevant water authorities. Wherever possible, available water quality data were used to substantiate descriptions of impacts. Data for mining operations located in Zimbabwe and South Africa were restricted to those mining operations that had achieved a minimum production specific to each commodity. This process of selection was not possible for other basin states due to the scarcity of data; all mining operations identified for the Angola, Botswana, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia and Tanzania sectors of the Zambezi and Limpopo basins were located on appropriate maps. For all three of the river basins, numerous mining operations have been closed, abandoned or not proceeded beyond initial prospecting and feasibility assessments. Unless these operations were likely to have a significant impact on water resources and water quality in their immediate vicinity, these operations were not dealt with. The study has confirmed the diverse array of mining and mineral processing activities that take place in the Zambezi, Limpopo and Olifants basins. The extent and severity of the impacts is dependent on the commodity iv exploited, the size of the facility, the climatic region in which the facility is situated and the efficiency and effectiveness of management control. The variety and extent of impacts in the three river basins has been segmented into the individual sub-catchments making up each basin. The overall impacts within each basin are then summarized for clarity. Several generic and specific conclusions were formed on the basis of the material examined during this study and are reported in Section 6. Based on these conclusions and the supporting information, specific recommendations have been listed in Section 7. These recommendations (Table 7.1) are listed here for convenience. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. i Table of Contents................................................................................................................................. v List of Figures ........................................................................................................................................ ix List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................ x Acknowledgements.............................................................................................................................. xv 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Terms of Reference ................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Approach to the project.............................................................................................................. 3 1.3.1 Project team ..................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Special Trip) XXXX WER Yes AANDRUS, Bloemfontein 9300
    Place Name Code Hub Surch Regional A KRIEK (special trip) XXXX WER Yes AANDRUS, Bloemfontein 9300 BFN No AANHOU WEN, Stellenbosch 7600 SSS No ABBOTSDALE 7600 SSS No ABBOTSFORD, East London 5241 ELS No ABBOTSFORD, Johannesburg 2192 JNB No ABBOTSPOORT 0608 PTR Yes ABERDEEN (48 hrs) 6270 PLR Yes ABORETUM 3900 RCB Town Ships No ACACIA PARK 7405 CPT No ACACIAVILLE 3370 LDY Town Ships No ACKERVILLE, Witbank 1035 WIR Town Ships Yes ACORNHOEK 1 3 5 1360 NLR Town Ships Yes ACTIVIA PARK, Elandsfontein 1406 JNB No ACTONVILLE & Ext 2 - Benoni 1501 JNB No ADAMAYVIEW, Klerksdorp 2571 RAN No ADAMS MISSION 4100 DUR No ADCOCK VALE Ext/Uit, Port Elizabeth 6045 PLZ No ADCOCK VALE, Port Elizabeth 6001 PLZ No ADDINGTON, Durban 4001 DUR No ADDNEY 0712 PTR Yes ADDO 2 5 6105 PLR Yes ADELAIDE ( Daily 48 Hrs ) 5760 PLR Yes ADENDORP 6282 PLR Yes AERORAND, Middelburg (Tvl) 1050 WIR Yes AEROTON, Johannesburg 2013 JNB No AFGHANI 2 4 XXXX BTL Town Ships Yes AFGUNS ( Special Trip ) 0534 NYL Town Ships Yes AFRIKASKOP 3 9860 HAR Yes AGAVIA, Krugersdorp 1739 JNB No AGGENEYS (Special trip) 8893 UPI Town Ships Yes AGINCOURT, Nelspruit (Special Trip) 1368 NLR Yes AGISANANG 3 2760 VRR Town Ships Yes AGULHAS (2 4) 7287 OVB Town Ships Yes AHRENS 3507 DBR No AIRDLIN, Sunninghill 2157 JNB No AIRFIELD, Benoni 1501 JNB No AIRFORCE BASE MAKHADO (special trip) 0955 PTR Yes AIRLIE, Constantia Cape Town 7945 CPT No AIRPORT INDUSTRIA, Cape Town 7525 CPT No AKASIA, Potgietersrus 0600 PTR Yes AKASIA, Pretoria 0182 JNB No AKASIAPARK Boxes 7415 CPT No AKASIAPARK, Goodwood 7460 CPT No AKASIAPARKKAMP,
    [Show full text]
  • Zeerust Sub District of Ramotshere Moiloa Magisterial District Main
    # # !C # ### # !C^# #!.C# # !C # # # # # # # # # ^!C# # # # # # # # ^ # # ^ # ## # !C # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # !C # # # # # # ## # # # # !C# # # # #!C# # # ## ^ ## # !C # # # # # ^ # # # # # # #!C # # # !C # # #^ # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # !C# ## # # # # # # !C# # !C # # # #^ # # # # # # # # # # # #!C# # # # # ## # # # # # # # ##!C # # ## # # # # # # # # # # !C### # # ## # ## # # # # # ## ## # ## !C## # # # # !C # # # #!C# # # # #^ # # # ## # # !C# # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # ## # # # # # # #!C # #!C #!C# # # # # # # ^# # # # # # # # # # ## # # ## # # !C# ^ ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # ### # ## # # !C # # #!C # # #!C # ## # !C## ## # # # # !C# # # ## # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # ## # # ### # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # #!C # # ## ## # # ## # ## # # ## ## # # #^!C # # # # # # ^ # # # # # # ## ## # # ## # # # # # !C # ## # # # #!C # ### # # # ##!C # # # # !C# #!C# ## # ## # # # !C # # ## # # ## # ## # ## ## # # ## !C# # # ## # ## # # ## #!C## # # # !C # !C# #!C # # ### # # # # # ## !C## !.### # ### # # # # ## !C # # # # # ## # #### # ## # # # # ## ## #^ # # # # # ^ # # !C# ## # # # # # # # !C## # ## # # # # # # # ## # # ##!C## ##!C# # !C# # # ## # !C### # # ^ # !C #### # # !C# ^#!C # # # !C # #!C ### ## ## #!C # ## # # # # # ## ## !C# ## # # # #!C # ## # ## ## # # # # # !C # # ^ # # ## ## ## # # # # !.!C## #!C## # ### # # # # # ## # # !C # # # # !C# # # # # # # # ## !C # # # # ## # # # # # # ## # # ## # # # ## # # ^ # # # # # # # ## !C ## # ^ # # # !C# # # # ^ # # ## #!C # # ^
    [Show full text]
  • Okavango River Basin Groundwater Overview
    Okavango River Basin Groundwater Overview Specialist Report prepared by Interconsult Namibia for : PERMANENT OKAVANGO RIVER BASIN COMMISSION Angola Botswana Namibia Ministério da Energia e Águas Ministry of Mineral Resources and Water Affairs Ministry of Agriculture, Water and Rural Development GABHIC Department of Water Affairs Department of Water Affairs Cx. P. 6695 Private Bag 0029 Private Bag 13193 LUANDA GABORONE WINDHOEK Tel: +244 2 393 681 Tel: +267 360 7100 Tel: +264 61 296 9111 Fax: +244 2 393 687 Fax: +267 303508 Fax: +264 61 232 861 PERMANENT OKAVANGO RIVER BASIN COMMISSION (OKACOM) OKAVANGO RIVER BASIN PREPARATORY ASSESSMENT: GROUNDWATER OVERVIEW Report prepared by: Interconsult Namibia (Pty) Ltd P. O. Box 20690 Windhoek With input from Wellfield Consulting Services, and E. Bereslawski March 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1. BACKGROUND.............................................................................................................. 1 1.2. TERMS OF REFERENCE ................................................................................................ 1 2 OVERVIEW OF THE GEOHYDROLOGY OF THE BASIN .............................................. 2 2.1 BASIN GEOLOGY.............................................................................................................. 2 2.2 GEOHYDROLOGY OVERVIEW ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of the Olifants River Area, Transvaal
    REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VANSUID-AFRIKA· DEPARTMENT OF MINES DEPARTEMENT VAN MYNWESE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIESE OPNAME THE GEOLOGY OF THE OLIFANTS RIVER AREA, TRANSVAAL AN EXPLANATION OF SHEETS 2429B (CHUNIESPOORT) AND 2430A (WOLKBERG) by J. S. I. Sehwellnus, D.Se., L. N. J. Engelbrecht, B.Sc., F. J. Coertze, B.Sc. (Hons.), H. D. Russell, B.Sc., S. J. Malherbe, B.Sc. (Hons.), D. P. van Rooyen, B.Sc., and R. Cooke, B.Sc. Met 'n opsomming in Afrikaans onder die opskrif: DIE GEOLOGIE VAN DIE GEBIED OLIFANTSRIVIER, TRANSVAAL COPYRIGHT RESERVED/KOPIEREG VOORBEHOU (1962) Printed by and obtainable (rom Gedruk deur en verkrygbaar the Government Printer, B(ls~ van die Staatsdrukker, Bosman­ man Street, Pretoria. straat, Pretoria. Geological map in colour on a Geologiese kaart in kleur op 'n scale of I: 125,000 obtainable skaal van I: 125.000 apart ver­ separately at the price of 60c. krygbaar teen die prys van 60c. & .r.::-~ h'd'~, '!!~l p,'-' r\ f: ~ . ~) t,~ i"'-, i CONTENTS PAGE ABSTRACT ........................ ' ••• no ..........' ........" ... • • • • • • • • •• 1 I. INTRODUCTION........ •.••••••••.••••••••.....••...•.•..••••..• 3 II. PHYSIOGRAPHY................................................ 4 A. ToPOGRAPHY..... • • . • • . • . • • . • • • . • • . • . • • • • • . • • • • • . • • • • • • ... 4 B. DRAINAGE.................................................... 6 C. CLIMATE ..........•.••••.•••••.••....................... ,.... 7 D. VEGETATION .••••.•••••.•.........•..... , ..............•... , . 7 III. GEOLOGICAL FORMATIONS ....................
    [Show full text]
  • Bulawayo City Mpilo Central Hospital
    Province District Name of Site Bulawayo Bulawayo City E. F. Watson Clinic Bulawayo Bulawayo City Mpilo Central Hospital Bulawayo Bulawayo City Nkulumane Clinic Bulawayo Bulawayo City United Bulawayo Hospital Manicaland Buhera Birchenough Bridge Hospital Manicaland Buhera Murambinda Mission Hospital Manicaland Chipinge Chipinge District Hospital Manicaland Makoni Rusape District Hospital Manicaland Mutare Mutare Provincial Hospital Manicaland Mutasa Bonda Mission Hospital Manicaland Mutasa Hauna District Hospital Harare Chitungwiza Chitungwiza Central Hospital Harare Chitungwiza CITIMED Clinic Masvingo Chiredzi Chikombedzi Mission Hospital Masvingo Chiredzi Chiredzi District Hospital Masvingo Chivi Chivi District Hospital Masvingo Gutu Chimombe Rural Hospital Masvingo Gutu Chinyika Rural Hospital Masvingo Gutu Chitando Rural Health Centre Masvingo Gutu Gutu Mission Hospital Masvingo Gutu Gutu Rural Hospital Masvingo Gutu Mukaro Mission Hospital Masvingo Masvingo Masvingo Provincial Hospital Masvingo Masvingo Morgenster Mission Hospital Masvingo Mwenezi Matibi Mission Hospital Masvingo Mwenezi Neshuro District Hospital Masvingo Zaka Musiso Mission Hospital Masvingo Zaka Ndanga District Hospital Matabeleland South Beitbridge Beitbridge District Hospital Matabeleland South Gwanda Gwanda Provincial Hospital Matabeleland South Insiza Filabusi District Hospital Matabeleland South Mangwe Plumtree District Hospital Matabeleland South Mangwe St Annes Mission Hospital (Brunapeg) Matabeleland South Matobo Maphisa District Hospital Matabeleland South Umzingwane Esigodini District Hospital Midlands Gokwe South Gokwe South District Hospital Midlands Gweru Gweru Provincial Hospital Midlands Kwekwe Kwekwe General Hospital Midlands Kwekwe Silobela District Hospital Midlands Mberengwa Mberengwa District Hospital .
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of South Africa in 1999
    THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF SOUTH AFRICA By George J. Coakley Mining and downstream minerals processing remained more than $3.3 billion was committed for new projects in 2000, keystones of the economy of the Republic of South Africa in chiefly in gold and PGM, and an additional $4.9 billion was 1999. With a population of 43.4 million, South Africa had a under consideration for future investment. gross domestic product (GDP) per capita of $6,900 based on purchasing power parity estimates for 1998.1 Of total exports of Production all goods, which were valued at $28 billion, gold exports accounted for 14.1%, and other minerals and metals exports, for In 1999, South Africa was one of the largest and most diverse about an additional 28%. According to the Minerals Bureau of minerals producers in the world. As listed in table 1, changes in South Africa, the primary mining sector contributed $7.7 output levels were mixed. Gold production decreased a further billion, or 6.5%, to the GDP. Adding the multiplier effects of 3% between 1998 and 1999 as the industry continued to services and goods supplied by industries that support the rationalize production to reduce operating costs in response to mining sector would increase the contribution to GDP by the continued depressed gold price. Production of most of the another 14%. The contribution to the GDP would also be other major metals was up from 1% to 10% compared with that significantly higher if the value-added mineral-processing of 1998. Output of iron ore, lead, steel, and vanadium declined.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa's Coalfields — a 2014 Perspective
    International Journal of Coal Geology 132 (2014) 170–254 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Coal Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijcoalgeo South Africa's coalfields — A 2014 perspective P. John Hancox a,⁎,AnnetteE.Götzb,c a University of the Witwatersrand, School of Geosciences and Evolutionary Studies Institute, Private Bag 3, 2050 Wits, South Africa b University of Pretoria, Department of Geology, Private Bag X20, Hatfield, 0028 Pretoria, South Africa c Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya St., Kazan 420008, Republic of Tatarstan, Russian Federation article info abstract Article history: For well over a century and a half coal has played a vital role in South Africa's economy and currently bituminous Received 7 April 2014 coal is the primary energy source for domestic electricity generation, as well as being the feedstock for the Received in revised form 22 June 2014 production of a substantial percentage of the country's liquid fuels. It furthermore provides a considerable source Accepted 22 June 2014 of foreign revenue from exports. Available online 28 June 2014 Based on geographic considerations, and variations in the sedimentation, origin, formation, distribution and quality of the coals, 19 coalfields are generally recognised in South Africa. This paper provides an updated review Keywords: Gondwana coal of their exploration and exploitation histories, general geology, coal seam nomenclature and coal qualities. With- Permian in the various coalfields autocyclic variability is the norm rather than the exception, whereas allocyclic variability Triassic is much less so, and allows for the correlation of genetically related sequences. During the mid-Jurassic break up Coalfield of Gondwana most of the coal-bearing successions were intruded by dolerite.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Profile Republic of Zambia Giraffe Conservation Status Report
    Country Profile Republic of Zambia Giraffe Conservation Status Report Sub-region: Southern Africa General statistics Size of country: 752,614 km² Size of protected areas / percentage protected area coverage: 30% (Sub)species Thornicroft’s giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis thornicrofti) Angolan giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis angolensis) – possible South African giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis giraffa) – possible Conservation Status IUCN Red List (IUCN 2012): Giraffa camelopardalis (as a species) – least concern G. c. thornicrofti – not assessed G. c. angolensis – not assessed G. c. giraffa – not assessed In the Republic of Zambia: The Zambia Wildlife Authority (ZAWA) is mandated under the Zambia Wildlife Act No. 12 of 1998 to manage and conserve Zambia’s wildlife and under this same act, the hunting of giraffe in Zambia is illegal (ZAWA 2015). Zambia has the second largest proportion of land under protected status in Southern Africa with approximately 225,000 km2 designated as protected areas. This equates to approximately 30% of the total land cover and of this, approximately 8% as National Parks (NPs) and 22% as Game Management Areas (GMA). The remaining protected land consists of bird sanctuaries, game ranches, forest and botanical reserves, and national heritage sites (Mwanza 2006). The Kavango Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area (KAZA TFCA), is potentially the world’s largest conservation area, spanning five southern African countries; Angola, Botswana, Namibia, Zambia and Zimbabwe, centred around the Caprivi-Chobe-Victoria Falls area (KAZA 2015). Parks within Zambia that fall under KAZA are: Liuwa Plain, Kafue, Mosi-oa-Tunya and Sioma Ngwezi (Peace Parks Foundation 2013). GCF is dedicated to securing a future for all giraffe populations and (sub)species in the wild.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Project Brief
    Public Disclosure Authorized IMPROVED RURAL CONNECTIVITY Public Disclosure Authorized PROJECT (IRCP) REHABILITATION OF PRIMARY FEEDER ROADS IN EASTERN PROVINCE Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT BRIEF September 2020 SUBMITTED BY EASTCONSULT/DASAN CONSULT - JV Public Disclosure Authorized Improved Rural Connectivity Project Environmental Project Brief for the Rehabilitation of Primary Feeder Roads in Eastern Province Improved Rural Connectivity Project (IRCP) Rehabilitation of Primary Feeder Roads in Eastern Province EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Government of the Republic Zambia (GRZ) is seeking to increase efficiency and effectiveness of the management and maintenance of the of the Primary Feeder Roads (PFR) network. This is further motivated by the recognition that the road network constitutes the single largest asset owned by the Government, and a less than optimal system of the management and maintenance of that asset generally results in huge losses for the national economy. In order to ensure management and maintenance of the PFR, the government is introducing the OPRC concept. The OPRC is a concept is a contracting approach in which the service provider is paid not for ‘inputs’ but rather for the results of the work executed under the contract i.e. the service provider’s performance under the contract. The initial phase of the project, supported by the World Bank will be implementing the Improved Rural Connectivity Project (IRCP) in some selected districts of Central, Eastern, Northern, Luapula, Southern and Muchinga Provinces. The project will be implemented in Eastern Province for a period of five (5) years from 2020 to 2025 using the Output and Performance Road Contract (OPRC) approach. GRZ thus intends to roll out the OPRC on the PFR Network covering a total of 14,333Kms country-wide.
    [Show full text]
  • Hlanganani Sub District of Makhado Magisterial District
    # # C! # # # ## ^ C!# .!C!# # # # C! # # # # # # # # # # C!^ # # # # # ^ # # # # ^ C! # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # C!# # # C!C! # # # # # # # # # #C! # # # # # C!# # # # # # C! # ^ # # # # # # # ^ # # # # # # # # C! # # C! # #^ # # # # # # # ## # # #C! # # # # # # # C! # # # # # C! # # # # # # # #C! # C! # # # # # # # # ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # C! # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #C! # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## C! # # # # # # # # # # # # # C! # # # # # # # # C! # # # # # # # # # C! # # ^ # # # # # C! # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # C! # # # ##^ C! # C!# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #C! ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # C! C! # # # # # ## # # C!# # # # C! # ! # # # # # # # C# # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # ## ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # C! # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ^ C! # # # # # # # ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # C! C! # # # # # # # # C! # # #C! # # # # # # C!# ## # # # # # # # # # # C! # # # # # ## # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # C! # # # # # # # # # # # ### C! # # C! # # # # C! # ## ## ## C! ! # # C # .! # # # # # # # HHllaannggaannaannii SSuubb DDiissttrriicctt ooff MMaakkhhaaddoo MMaagg# iisstteerriiaall DDiissttrriicctt # # # # ## # # C! # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ROXONSTONE SANDFONTEIN Phiphidi # # # BEESTON ZWARTHOEK PUNCH BOWL CLIFFSIDE WATERVAL RIETBOK WATERFALL # COLERBRE # # 232 # GREYSTONE Nzhelele # ^ # # 795 799 812 Matshavhawe # M ### # # HIGHFIELD VLAKFONTEIN
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    HSBC Project: Process Framework E4474 V2 Public Disclosure Authorized GOVERNMENT OF ZIMBABWE Public Disclosure Authorized MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT, WATER AND CLIMATE HWANGE SANYATI BIODIVERSITY CORRIDOR (HSBC) PROJECT PROCESS FRAMEWORK Public Disclosure Authorized MARCH 2014 Public Disclosure Authorized 1 Waterkings Environment Consultancy: [email protected] HSBC Project: Process Framework Table of Contents Item Description Page Executive Summary 6 1.0 Introduction 8 1.1 Purpose of the PF 9 1.2 Preparation of the PF 10 1.3 Background of implementing entities 11 2.0 Project Description 19 2.1 Project location 20 2.2 Project activities 24 3.0 Legal, Policy and Administrative Arrangement 28 3.1 Constitution of Zimbabwe 28 3.2 Environment Management Act 29 3.3 Parks and Wildlife Management Act 30 3.4 Land Tenure 31 3.5 Traditional Leaders Act 31 3.6 Water Act 32 3.7 Administrative and Legal Procedures 32 3.8 Participation of NGOs 34 3.9 World Bank Safeguards Policies 35 4.0 Socio Economic baseline 36 4.1 land Use Pattern 36 4.2 Administrative arrangement 37 4.3 Cultural standing 39 4.4 Livelihoods 40 4.5 Demographic 42 4.6 Education 43 4.7 Vulnerable grounds 44 5.0 Community consultation and engagement 46 5.1 Community stakeholder profile 46 2 Waterkings Environment Consultancy: [email protected] HSBC Project: Process Framework 5.2 Engagement of partners 49 5.3 Stakeholder consultation discussion 50 6.0 Impact Management 65 6.1 Project Affected People Criteria 66 6.2 Impact analysis 67 6.3 Impact assessment 71 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Science and Stewardship to Protect and Sustain
    Zambezi River: Wilderness and Tourism Research Into Visitor Perceptions About Wilderness and Its Value Sally Wynn Abstract—This paper outlines the findings of questionnaire re- sources, implying that tourism was having a negative im- search undertaken by a conservation nongovernment organization pact on the Zambezi River’s wilderness values. The reports (NGO), the Zambezi Society, to capture perceptions about wilder- were wide ranging: unchecked commercialization, ad hoc ness and its values from people visiting four Zambezi River tourism development, tree cutting, border violations, unauthorized destinations in Zimbabwe. The research was conducted during a road and camp building, noise pollution, littering and abuse tourism boom in the area when the Society was receiving complaints of camping sites, illicit tour and guiding activities, and so on. that the wild values of the river were being eroded by tourism The overriding tenor was that the special “wilderness value” malpractice. of the Zambezi River was being eroded by inappropriate The research produced a visitor-generated definition of “wilder- tourism behavior and development. ness” in the Zambezi River context; a list of the attributes that make To provide a balanced response, the Society embarked on a place wild; an indication of the high value of a wilderness experience a research project in 1998 aimed at capturing peoples’ to Zambezi visitors; a list of factors that detract from people’s perceptions about wilderness in the Zambezi context, as well enjoyment of a wilderness experience; a list of the wild areas most as providing a workable definition of the term “wilderness,” valued by visitors to the Zambezi; and some detailed observations its “values,” and its importance to visitors to the Zambezi.
    [Show full text]