A F1lcsis Slibmilted Ta the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research 111 Partial Fullfillment of the Requirements of Tl,E Degree of Master of Arts

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A F1lcsis Slibmilted Ta the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research 111 Partial Fullfillment of the Requirements of Tl,E Degree of Master of Arts The Baptistery San Giovanni in Florence and its Placement within the Chronology of Tuscan Romanesque Churches Brian E. Roy Dept. of Art History • McGill University March,1994 "A f1lCsis slIbmilted ta the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research 111 partial fullfillment of the requirements of tl,e degree of Master of Arts. " © Brian E. Roy, 1994 • / 1 Abslract • The controversial dating of the Baptistery San Giovanni i8 approached through formalistic considerations. FormaI analyses of the Baptistery and the Duomo (If Pisa lcad to comparison and isolation of definitive features of PIsan and Florcntine stylCb. As such, the buildines are shown to be prototypes and their rc~pcctivc rcceptions are traced ir. the Romanesque churches of Fiesole, EmpoIi, LUCCil, PIstoia and Sàfdinia. It is concluded that the Baptistery must have been complctcd bcfore the Duomo of Pisa was begun Résumé La datation du Baptistère San Giovanni à Flor(lnce est mise en question. Suivant des analyses formalistiques, les styles distinctifs des deux églises sont définis. La réception des deux monuments est tracée dans les églises d'Empoli, Fiesole, PistOle est Sardegna. Enfin, on trouve que la construction du Baptistère était compli>tc avant que la cathédrale de Pise il été commencée . • • II • Acktlowlcdgeme1lts Expressions of the most sincere gratitude are extcnded ta Dr. H. J. Biikt'r Jor 1/1::; guidance and encouragement, ta the staff at the Departl1le/lt of Art History, ta flte helpful personnel at Blackader-Lallterman library, alld to tlle Bram Carber Foundatiol1 for its gencrollS financial support . • • 111 • Introduction 1 1: Dating: 4 The Baptistery San Giovanni at Florence 4 The Duomo of Pisa 13 Il: Analyses and Comparison 14 The Baptistery San Giovanni 14 The Duomo of Pisa 20 Comparison 33 III: The Reception of the Baptistery San Giovanni 41 San Miniato al Monte 44 The Collegiate Church of Sant'Andrea at Empoli 45 The Badia Fiesolana 46 Slln Salvatore al Vescovo 47 IV: The Reception of the Duomo of Pisa 49 • Lucca: Duomo San Martino 49 San Mkhele in Foro 54 San Frediano 56 Pistoia: San Giovanni Fuorcivitas 58 San Bartolomeo in Pantano 59 Sardinia: Ozieri, Sant'Antioco di Bisarcio 61 Ottana, San Nicolô 61 Borutta, San Pietro di Sorres 63 Codrongianus, 5S Trinità di Saccargia 65 Conclusions 67 Bibliograpy 74 Gro~.mdplans and Illustrations 79 • l • ! Introduction • One problern WhlCh troltbles architectural histori,ms concerns thl' dating and building chronology of the BaptIstery San Giovanni at Plon.'nee. Long the subject of debate, construction dates as early as the fourth dnd as latl' as the twelfth century have been proposed. While 1110st sL'holars prt'sl'ntly agree that the building was begun in the eleventh ccntury, histonans in favour of a Romanesque dating have re-interpreted the ~dme body of evidence as those supporting an Early ChristIan dating. One point on which aIl scholars agree is that the marble incrustation covering aIl of the walls of the buildmg is Romanesque. D,lting the incrustation has bee:1 somewhat problemahc. In the carly part of the present century Beenken proposed a late tenth- or early eleventh-century date for tlw completion of the incrustation.1 This theory was countered in the fOllrtJ(~~ by Walter Horn, who compiled a chronology of Florentme ROllhlllPSqUt' churches.2 Horn's date of c1150 for the cornpletioll of the mcrustation has since received a favourable response from most scholar~ of Florl'lltll1e Romanesque architecture. The case for an carlier ~<ltmg has most fl'Cl'iltly been championed by Werner Jacobsen who places the initation of construction to the third decade of the eleventh ccntury, with a terminus post quem for the incrustation of 1093.3 The present thesis favours an carly to mid eleventh-century dating for the completion of ~he incrustation. As su ch, It is in line with the theories of 8eenken and Jacobsen, white contradictmg the popular theories of Walter Horn, and also of PIero Sanpaolesi who saw the Baptistery within a larger group of churches following the construction of the 1H. Beenken, "Der Florentiner Inkrustationsarchltektur des XI Jahrhunderts" 2W. Horn, Das Florentiner Baptisterium, and "Romanesque Churches ln Florence" • 3W. Jacobsen, "Zur Datierung der florentiner Baptlsteriums San Giovanm". 2 Duomo of Pisa.4 Toward the objective of adcling welght to the argument of an early to • rnid eleventh-century datmg [')1 the completion of incrustation at the Baptistery San Giovanni, the present thesls proposes to place the Baptistery wlthm the chronology cf Tuscan Romanesque churches. The anchor of the chronology is the Duomo of PIsa, the initation of construction of which is securcly dated at 1064. The hypothesis is that the churches in the study are either before or after Pisa. The ultimate objective is placing the Baptistery relative to Pisa. The methodology begins with a thorough analysis of both the Baptistery and the Duomo, that the (orms and conceptions can be compared. In this way it is possible to lsolate slmilar and divergent features. As such, the divergent clements constitute a list of definitive criteria for either the Pisan or Florentine style. The validity of the criteria is tested by tracing the receptian of the Florentme and Pisan prototypes. The present study will show that the reception of the Flol'~ntine style was restricted and short lived, while the Pisan style was enthusiasticdIly received throughout the region, but conspicuously absent at Florence. Further, it will be shawn that the churches representative of the reception of the Baptistery were, by and large, cornpleted before any of the churches following Pis a were begun. Finally, the findings are interpreted in light of traditional evidence and theories. As such, the first chapter of this thesis is dedicated to the re­ examinatiOl\ of traditional evidence and theories concerning the dating and building chronology of the Baptistery. In the second chapter the Baptistery and the Duomo are analysed and compared so that conceptual ùifferences between the two can be isolated. Consequently, the reception of the • 4p. Sanpaolesi, Il Ouamo di Plsa, 125. J Florentine style is discussed in the third chapter, and that cf Pis.l in the • fourth. A concluding chapter syntheslzes the aforenwntioned dlScll~sillns, and finds that the Baphstery must have been t'egun beforl' the middll' of tl1l' eleventh century, with incrustation complete before constructu.m W,1S much advanced, or perhaps even begun, at Fisa. • • 4 Chapter 1: Dating the Baptistery San Giovanni at Florence • and the Duomo of Pisa Tlle Baplistery San Giovanni al Florence Therc is no definitive documentatIon to permit a precise dating of the Baptistery San Giovunni m Florence. Epigrdphic evidence is restricted and excavations have !pd to dIvergent interpretations. Many of the conclusions reached by scholars about the date of construction have beE'n based on stylistic comparison with more securely-dated buildings. The development of constructiona! techniques in Florentine Romanesque architecture has also been studICd and relative chronologies of the Florentine churches have been proposed. TitI' Documentation Documents fram Caralingian and Ottonian times attest to the existence of a basihca or temple dedicated to the Baptist 0ccupying the site of the present baptist~ry.:; The earliest record of the dedication of the church in 1059 appears in a twelfth-century document.6 The association of Pope Nicholas II 5"Dum ad preclaram potestatem domni Lambertl pllsslml Imperatons missus directus fUisset ln flnlbus Tuscle Amedeus cornes palatl[li] et c Jnvenisset clvltate FlorenCia in domlnlum eplscopll IpSIUS clvitatls, elus ln atno, ant(3 basilica sanct: loanni Baptlsta ... " Judgement record dated 897, onginal ln Archlvlo Arciv 7scovlle, Lucea, Manaresl, doc. 102 "concesslmus et condonaUlmus eeCleSlae Beati lohanms eplscopatui Florentino, cui Grasulfus uenerabllus auctre Deo preese Uldetur, id est terra ad modls duodeclm, quae dlcltur Campus Regis, prope Ipsam eccleslam" 898, onginal ln Florence ACF, Plattoh, doc. 7 "per uestra -::ar!ula offerslonls dedlste et offersiste ln ecJesla et domUi Sancti 10annL" Property Grant of Bishop Ralmbaldus dated 941, origlnal in ACF, Piatto/i, doc. 11. "terre et case Ille sunt prope eec\ a et dom us S lohannls." Property exchange of Bishop Lambert dated 1032, Archlvlo dl Stato, Lucca,S. Ponzlano, Cocchi,65, 125 "In cUitate Florentia lusta ecclesia et domUi Sanc!1 lohannls batIste .. " Gift ot priest Roland, dated 1040, Archlvio dl Stato, Florence, S Fellcltà, Plattoh, doc 42. 6The ded/catlon IS recorded tirs! ln the twelfth-century "Ri!us ln Eeclesla Servandi," • Ricardlana 3005, fol. 65 The notion IS repeated in an early 13th-century document with the dedication on 6 Nov, 1059 is fIrst mentioped ln the sl'\,l'ntl'l'nth • ceritury. Firm documentation records Nicholas' prt.'sencl' 1I1 Florl'l1ù' ,lt Il',lst from 7 Ncw. 1059 until Jan. 1060.7 The fourteenth-century Florentine chronicler Villani h.1S Il'ft Sl'\'l'r.li notes concerning the BaptIstery.8 He is the first to mention tlw Pis.1Il gifl ot two porphyry columns in 1117.9 These columns werl' ~)rigin,llly l'rl'clL'd iIl front of the Baptisteryl0 and later attached tn the l'.lst l'xtl'nor w,lll of thL' building in the Quattrocento. 11 Villani, and a number of otl1l'r wrîtl'rs - including Dante, Petrarch, and Poliziano - stated that the Bapllstl'ry W.1S converted from a Roman temple ta Mars. 12 Villani nlso records th.ll tlll' lantern was erected in 1150. 13 The replacement of the original semi-circular apse on the west pnd of the bUIlding with the rectc1ngular scarsclla in 1202 is first J1lentlolll'd III tlll' seven teenth century.14 Less reliable documenta tian rl'fers to 1Ill' 1Il~ talla tion of a Baptismal font of unknown shape and dimensions III 112H.' '1 "Mores et Consuetudines canonlce florentIne," Archlvlo dei Duomo, Florence, ser la/3/8, fol 25.
Recommended publications
  • The Sasanian Tradition in ʽabbāsid Art: Squinch Fragmentation As The
    The Sasanian Tradition in ʽAbbāsid Art: squinch fragmentation as The structural origin of the muqarnas La tradición sasánida en el arte ʿabbāssí: la fragmentación de la trompa de esquina como origen estructural de la decoración de muqarnas A tradição sassânida na arte abássida: a fragmentação do arco de canto como origem estrutural da decoração das Muqarnas Alicia CARRILLO1 Abstract: Islamic architecture presents a three-dimensional decoration system known as muqarnas. An original system created in the Near East between the second/eighth and the fourth/tenth centuries due to the fragmentation of the squinche, but it was in the fourth/eleventh century when it turned into a basic element, not only all along the Islamic territory but also in the Islamic vocabulary. However, the origin and shape of muqarnas has not been thoroughly considered by Historiography. This research tries to prove the importance of Sasanian Art in the aesthetics creation of muqarnas. Keywords: Islamic architecture – Tripartite squinches – Muqarnas –Sasanian – Middle Ages – ʽAbbāsid Caliphate. Resumen: La arquitectura islámica presenta un mecanismo de decoración tridimensional conocido como decoración de muqarnas. Un sistema novedoso creado en el Próximo Oriente entre los siglos II/VIII y IV/X a partir de la fragmentación de la trompa de esquina, y que en el siglo XI se extendió por toda la geografía del Islam para formar parte del vocabulario del arte islámico. A pesar de su importancia y amplio desarrollo, la historiografía no se ha detenido especialmente en el origen formal de la decoración de muqarnas y por ello, este estudio pone de manifiesto la influencia del arte sasánida en su concepción estética durante el Califato ʿabbāssí.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Inhalt
    34 Rome, Pantheon, c. 120 A.D. Contents 34 Rome, Temple of Minerva Medica, c. 300 A.D. 35 Rome, Calidarium, Thermae of Caracalla, 211-217 A.D. Inhalt 35 Trier (Germany), Porta Nigra, c. 300 A.D. 36 NTmes (France), Pont du Gard, c. 15 B.C. 37 Rome, Arch of Constantine, 315 A.D. (Plan and elevation 1:800, Elevation 1:200) 38-47 Early Christian Basilicas and Baptisteries Frühchristliche Basiliken und Baptisterien 8- 9 Introduction by Ogden Hannaford 40 Rome, Basilica of Constantine, 310-13 41 Rome, San Pietro (Old Cathedral), 324 42 Ravenna, Sant' Apollinare Nuovo, c. 430-526 10-19 Great Buildings of Egypt, Mesopotamia and Persia 42 Ravenna, Sant'Apollinare in Classe, 534-549 Grosse Bauten Ägyptens, Mesopotamiens und Persiens 43 Rome, Sant' Agnese Fuori Le Mura, 7th cent. 43 Rome, San Clemente, 1084-1108 12 Giza (Egypt), Site Plan (Scale 1:5000) 44 Rome, Santa Costanza, c. 350 13 Giza, Pyramid of Cheops, c. 2550 B.C. (1:800) 44 Rome, Baptistery of Constantine (Lateran), 430-440 14 Karnak (Egypt), Site Plan, 1550-942 B.C. (1:5000) 44 Nocera (Italy), Baptistery, 450 15 Abu-Simbel (Egypt), Great Temple of Ramesses II, c. 1250 B.C. 45 Ravenna, Orthodox Baptistery, c. 450 (1:800, 1:200) 15 Mycenae (Greece), Treasury of Atreus, c. 1350 B.C. 16 Medinet Habu (Egypt), Funerary Temple of Ramesses II, c. 1175 B.C. 17 Edfu (Egypt), Great Temple of Horus, 237-57 B.C. 46-53 Byzantine Central and Cross-domed Churches 18 Khorsabad (Iraq), Palace of Sargon, 721 B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Gable Roof, Often Decorated Or Pierced in Victorian Houses
    Part E Appendices Village of Maple Heritage Conservation District Plan 141 Appendix A: Glossary of Architectural Terms Italicised words are defined in other entries. ABA rhythm: a pattern of alternating bays. Other rhythms might be ABBA, or AABBAA, for example. Arcade: a running series of arches, supported on piers or columns. Arch: a curved structure over an opening, supported by mutual lateral pressure. Architrave: The lowest division of an entablature. Ashlar: Squared stone masonry laid in regular courses with fine joints. Balustrade: A parapet or guard consisting of balusters supporting a rail or coping. The stair rail on the open side of a household stair is a common example of a balustrade. Barge board: The board along the edge of a gable roof, often decorated or pierced in Victorian houses. Battlement: A notched parapet, like on a castle. Also called castellation. The notches are called embassures or crenelles, and the raised parts are called merlons. Bay: Divisions of a building marked by windows, pilasters, etc. An Ontario cottage with a centre door and windows on either side would be called a 3-bay house with an ABA rhythm. Bay window: A group of windows projecting beyond a main wall. Commonly with angled sides in the Victorian style, and rectangular in Edwardian. Bipartite: In two parts. Blind: An imitation opening on a solid wall is called blind. Thus a blind arch, a blind window, a blind arcade. Board-and-batten: Wood siding consisting of wide vertical boards, the joints of which are covered by narrow vertical strips, or battens. Bond: A pattern of bricklaying in a wall.
    [Show full text]
  • AUSTRALIAN ROMANESQUE a History of Romanesque-Inspired Architecture in Australia by John W. East 2016
    AUSTRALIAN ROMANESQUE A History of Romanesque-Inspired Architecture in Australia by John W. East 2016 CONTENTS 1. Introduction . 1 2. The Romanesque Style . 4 3. Australian Romanesque: An Overview . 25 4. New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory . 52 5. Victoria . 92 6. Queensland . 122 7. Western Australia . 138 8. South Australia . 156 9. Tasmania . 170 Chapter 1: Introduction In Australia there are four Catholic cathedrals designed in the Romanesque style (Canberra, Newcastle, Port Pirie and Geraldton) and one Anglican cathedral (Parramatta). These buildings are significant in their local communities, but the numbers of people who visit them each year are minuscule when compared with the numbers visiting Australia's most famous Romanesque building, the large Sydney retail complex known as the Queen Victoria Building. God and Mammon, and the Romanesque serves them both. Do those who come to pray in the cathedrals, and those who come to shop in the galleries of the QVB, take much notice of the architecture? Probably not, and yet the Romanesque is a style of considerable character, with a history stretching back to Antiquity. It was never extensively used in Australia, but there are nonetheless hundreds of buildings in the Romanesque style still standing in Australia's towns and cities. Perhaps it is time to start looking more closely at these buildings? They will not disappoint. The heyday of the Australian Romanesque occurred in the fifty years between 1890 and 1940, and it was largely a brick-based style. As it happens, those years also marked the zenith of craft brickwork in Australia, because it was only in the late nineteenth century that Australia began to produce high-quality, durable bricks in a wide range of colours.
    [Show full text]
  • To Be Visited in Florence
    10 Places you can’t miss… 1. Piazza Duomo In Piazza Duomo there are three masterpieces that cannot be missed. Florence’s beautiful Gothic cathedral, named Santa Maria del Fiore (Saint Mary of the Flower) can hold 20.000 people. Its exterior is made of green, pink, and white marble. Brunelleschi's Dome, La Cupola, is a masterpiece. You can climb the 463 steps to its top. The Baptistery is one of Florence's oldest buildings. It is made of green and white marble and has three sets of amazing bronze doors, one of them is so beautiful that Florentine people named it The Door of Paradise. The bell tower, known as the Campanile di Giotto, was designed by the famous artist Giotto. 2. Piazza della Signoria and Palazzo della Signoria Piazza della Signoria, Signorìa Square, is the heart of the historic center. It has been Florence's political center since the middle ages and Florence's town hall, the beautiful medieval Signoria Palace, sits on the piazza. 3. The Uffizi Loggia and the Uffizi Gallery This is one of the most famous museums of paintings and sculpture in the world. Its collection includes several universally acclaimed masterpieces of all time, including works by Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, Raffaello, Botticelli, Giotto, Simone Martini, Piero della Francesca, Frà Angelico, Filippo Lippi, Mantegna, Correggio, and Caravaggio. German, Dutch and Flemish masters are also well represented with important works by Dürer, Rembrandt and Rubens. The Uffizzi Loggia can be visited anytime even when the gallery is closed. 4. Ponte Vecchio The Ponte Vecchio, the old bridge, was Florence's first bridge across the Arno River and is the only surviving bridge from Florence's medieval days as the others were destroyed in World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • Lascarid Architecture
    HANS BUCHWALD / STUTTGART LASCARID ARCHITECTURE With t,en plates After the Latin conquest of Constantinople in 1204 the Lascarid dynasty in Asia Minor, with its center initially in Nicaea, soon gained the political and military lead among the several Byzantine states which were formed on the territory of the former Byzantine empire. With only brief intervals it retained that lead throughout the period of the Latin control of Constantinople, and expanded its territorial possessions until eventually a number of Aegean islands and large parts of what is now northern Greece and Turkish Thrace were under its control. In 1261 Michael Paleologus, who had usurped the Lascarid throne only two years earlier and had become the de facto, if not the rightful heir to their empire, ended the Latin occupation of the capital, and initiated the revival and final high point of the Byzantine empire which is associated with the name of the dynasty he founded'. The artistic and cultural achievements of the Paleologue period are relatively well known, even though the qualities of Paleologue architecture. with its unusually rich repertoire of forms, have recently unjustifiably been down graded" If, as is so often the case, the political developments of the period are reflected in the arts, then the impetus of forms developed or conserved in Lascarid Asia Minor should be visible in the early monuments of Paleologue Constantinople. On the other hand, practically nothing was known until now concerning the architecture built under the Lascarids, and to my knowledge an attempt to determine its characteristics does not as yet exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D: Glossary Appendix D: Glossary
    APPENDIX D: GLOSSARY APPENDIX D: GLOSSARY ADAPTIVE USE. Recycling an old building for a use other than BAY. A part of a structure defined by vertical divisions such as that for which it was originally constructed. Adaptive re-use can adjacent columns or piers; a section of one or more stories that projects involve a sensitive rehabilitation that retains much of a building’s from the face of a building, usually defined by windows as in a bay original character, or it can involve extensive remodeling. window. ADDITION. A new part such as a wing, ell, or porch added to an BAY WINDOW. Fenestration projecting from an exterior wall existing building or structure. surface and often forming a recess in the interior space. ALTERATION. A visible change to the exterior of a building or BEAM. A structural member whose major function is to carry structure. transverse loads, as a joist, girder, rafter, or purlin. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA). The BELTCOURSE. A flat, horizontal member that projects slightly and Americans with Disabilities Act, enacted in 1990, gives civil rights that defines divisions in a wall plane; also stringcourse. protections to individuals with disabilities. It guarantees equal opportunity for individuals with disabilities in public accommodations, BLIND ARCADE OF WINDOWS. A decorative row of arches employment, transportation, state and local government services, and or windows applied to a wall as an architectural design device to telecommunications. decorate an elevation; also referred to as blank windows or arches. APRON. The horizontal board or trim located below the window sill, BOARD AND BATTEN. Vertical siding composed of wide boards connecting the sill to the wall; the horizontal or angled board or trim that do not overlap and narrow strips, or battens, nailed over the member of a deck or stairway, respectively; the curved area between joints between the boards.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aesthetics of Islamic Architecture & the Exuberance of Mamluk Design
    The Aesthetics of Islamic Architecture & The Exuberance of Mamluk Design Tarek A. El-Akkad Dipòsit Legal: B. 17657-2013 ADVERTIMENT. La consulta d’aquesta tesi queda condicionada a l’acceptació de les següents condicions d'ús: La difusió d’aquesta tesi per mitjà del servei TDX (www.tesisenxarxa.net) ha estat autoritzada pels titulars dels drets de propietat intel·lectual únicament per a usos privats emmarcats en activitats d’investigació i docència. No s’autoritza la seva reproducció amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva difusió i posada a disposició des d’un lloc aliè al servei TDX. No s’autoritza la presentació del s eu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant al resum de presentació de la tesi com als seus continguts. En la utilització o cita de parts de la tesi és obligat indicar el nom de la persona autora. ADVERTENCIA. La consulta de esta tesis queda condicionada a la aceptación de las siguientes condiciones de uso: La difusión de esta tesis por medio del servicio TDR (www.tesisenred.net) ha sido autorizada por los titulares de los derechos de propiedad intelectual únicamente para usos privados enmarcados en actividades de investigación y docencia. No se autoriza su reproducción con finalidades de lucro ni su difusión y puesta a disposición desde un sitio ajeno al servicio TDR. No se autoriza la presentación de su contenido en una ventana o marco ajeno a TDR (framing). Esta reserva de derechos afecta tanto al resumen de presentación de la tesis como a sus contenidos.
    [Show full text]
  • Passepartour 2019
    PASSEPARTOUR 2019 FIRENZE OLTRARNO THE KEYS OF ACCESSIBILITY Florence is a world heritage site and as such it must be accessible to all, without exclusion. Florence welcomes people with physical disabilities due to an abundance of pedestrian areas and accessible historical and artistic sites. It is also unde- niable that some routes of the city-center - similar to many other historical cities throughout the world - may present some difficulties for people using wheelchairs: for example narrow streets, tiny sidewalks that are not easily passable or not homogeneous pavement. To address this problem and provide information on which paths are the best to follow for people with physical disabilities, the Municipality of Florence in collaboration with Kinoa Srl have designed and published this Guide. The PASSEPARTOUR project is made up of four volumes, each describing four different tourist itineraries "without barriers". In addition, the guide provides a map of the historical city-center, highlighting all the areas that can be navigated with complete autonomy, or with the support of a helper. In addition, Kinoa has developed the navigation app Kimap, which acts as a companion tool to the guide for the mobility of disabled people. Kimap can be downloaded for free on every smartphone: the app shows the most accessible path to reach your desired destination and is constantly updated. We hope that this project will contribute to improve the tourist experi- ence for those visiting our marvellous City, opening the doors to its extraordinary heritage. Cecilia Del Re Councilor for Tourism of the City of Florence Florence is a world heritage site and as such it must be accessible to all, without exclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Arch 150 Appreciation of Architecture 1 Fall 2016 • Prof
    Arch 150 Appreciation of Architecture 1 Fall 2016 • Prof. Alex Anderson Test 4 Study Guide (test available Thurs 12/8 at 6:00 pm until Sat 12/10 at 6:00 pm) The test is open book. You may use any resource you like, as long as you work on your own. It is 30 questions, 40 minutes. Lectures Covered: Construction 2 Byzantine and Carolingian Early Islamic Romanesque Gothic Readings in the text: Pages 133-46, 153-160, 172-175, 177-249 Buildings (quite a few buildings in a few lectures!): Construction 2: Fontenay Abbey Don’t worry about specific buildings St. Michael Hildesheim Concentrate on terms and ideas St. Sernin, Toulouse St. Foy, Conques Byzantine and Carolingian: Santiago de Compastella Old St. Peter’s, Rome Speyer Cathedral Santa Maria Maggiore, Rome St. Etienne, Caen Santa Costanza, Rome Durham Cathedral Orthodox Baptistery, Ravenna San Miniato al Monte, Florence Hagia Sophia, Constantinople St. Front, Périgueux San Apollinare in Classe, Ravenna Pisa Cathedral San Vitale, Ravenna Church San Marco, Venice Baptistery Palatine Chapel of Charlemagne, Aachen Campanile Early Islamic Gothic Ka’ba, Mecca St. Denis, Paris Dome of the Rock, Jerusalem Notre Dame, Paris Great Mosque, Damascus Notre Dame, Chartres Mosque of al-Mutawakkil, Samarra Sainte-Chapelle, Paris Great Mosque, Córdoba Carcassonne (walls) Alhambra, Granada Salisbury Cathedral Sultan Han, Kayseri Lincoln Cathedral King’s College Chapel, Cambridge Romanesque: Santa Maria del Fiore, Florence Castle Rising, Norfolk Church Dover Castle, Dover Baptistery Ávila, Spain (walls and
    [Show full text]
  • Open Muroya Thesis.Pdf
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY A COMPARISON OF NORMAN ARCHITECTURE IN THE KINGDOMS OF ENGLAND AND SICILY Mikito Muroya FALL 2014 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in History with honors in History Reviewed and approved* by the following: Kathryn Salzer Assistant Professor of History Thesis Supervisor Mike Milligan Senior Lecturer in History Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i ABSTRACT This study offers a comparison of the differing architectural styles and forms in the Norman Kingdoms of Sicily and England, exploring what exactly differed, as well as attempting to determine why such differences exist in each area. In the Kingdom of England, the Normans largely imported their own forms from Normandy, incorporating little of the Anglo-Saxon architectural heritage. There are in fact examples of seemingly deliberate attempts to eliminate important Anglo-Saxon buildings and replace them with structures built along Norman lines. By contrast, in the Kingdom of Sicily, buildings erected after the arrival of the Normans feature a mix of styles, incorporating features of the earlier Islamic, Byzantine and local Italian Romanesque, as well as the Normans' own forms. It is difficult to say why such variance existed, but there are numerous possibilities. Some result from the way each state was formed: England had already existed as a kingdom when the Normans conquered the land and replaced the ruling class, while the Kingdom of Sicily was a creation of the Norman conquerors; furthermore, the length of time taken to complete the conquest contrasted greatly.
    [Show full text]
  • Basilica Di San Miniato Al Monte
    Scuola Secondaria di I grado Pio X Artigianelli – Firenze Arte e Immagine – Prof. Fortunato Rao Basilica di San Miniato al Monte Storia. Ci troviamo davanti ad una delle chiese più antiche di Firenze (pensate che la prima testimonianza storica, cioè documentata, di una chiesa a Firenze dedicata a San Miniato risale al 783, in un diploma di Carlo Magno). Secondo la tradizione fu costruita sulla tomba di Miniato, principe armeno, convertitosi al cristianesimo e venuto a Firenze dove è stato ucciso, tra il 249 ed il 251 d.C. durante le persecuzioni dell’Imperatore Decio, diventando così il primo martire cristiano della città romana di Florentia. Qui la storia e la leggenda si sovrappongono: quest’ultima narra che Miniato, dopo essere stato decapitato lungo le rive dell’Arno - subito fuori dalla città romana - raccolse la propria testa, se la mise sotto il braccio e venne a morire sul monte dove aveva vissuto, come eremita, nei suoi anni fiorentini. All’inizio, sulla sua tomba, fu costruito un piccolo oratorio che divenne ben presto luogo di pellegrinaggio e, successivamente, sede del monastero benedettino (i monaci benedettini qui vivono e sono ancora i custodi di questo luogo). Nel 1013, in prossimità della porta a sinistra della facciata (per questo si chiama “porta santa”) furono rinvenute le spoglie del santo e così, per decisione del vescovo Ildebrando, fu iniziata la costruzione dell’attuale basilica. Quando entreremo nella Basilica, sul pavimento intarsiato, all’inizio della navata centrale, troveremo un’iscrizione che riporta la data “1207”: è la data in cui furono ultimati i lavori di costruzione che - perciò - durarono circa 200 anni.
    [Show full text]