DOCSLIB.ORG

Prosecution Pre-Trial Brief

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prosecution Pre-Trial Brief IT-04-75-PT 7298 UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No. IT-04-75-PT Prosecutionof Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of Date: 3July2012 International HumanitarianLaw Committedinthe Territoryof the former Yugoslavia since 1991 IN TRIAL CHAMBER II Before: Judge GuyDelvoie, Presiding Judge BurtonHall Judge Antoine Kesia-Mbe Mindua Registrar: Mr John Hocking Date: 3July2012 THE PROSECUTOR v. GORAN HAD@I] PUBLIC REDACTED PROSECUTION PRE-TRIAL BRIEF The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Douglas Stringer Counsel for the Accused: Mr. Zoran@ivanovi} Mr. Christopher Gosnell IT-04-75-PT 7297 I. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................1 II. THE JOINT CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE (JCE).......................................................................2 A. COMMON CRIMINAL PURPOSE.......................................................................................................2 B. HAD`I} WAS A JCE MEMBER ........................................................................................................2 C. OTHER JCE MEMBERS ..................................................................................................................3 D. HAD`I} WORKED WITH OTHER JCE MEMBERS TO CREATE ETHNIC-SERB TERRITORIES IN CROATIA ....................................................................................................................................6 E. THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON CRIMINAL PURPOSE .......................................................8 1. Patternof crimes ......................................................................................................................9 2. The establishment of SAO SBWS .........................................................................................13 3. The creationof separate Serbpolice andmilitarystructures inSBWS.................................14 4. The deployment of MUP/SDB-sponsoredunits andpersonnel toSBWS.............................16 5. The incorporationof volunteers from Serbia.........................................................................18 6. The interventionof the JNA toprotect Serbinterests............................................................19 7. The SAO Krajina andSAO WesternSlavonia ......................................................................20 8. The RSK andthe Vance Plan.................................................................................................21 9. The implementationof discriminatorypolicies against nonSerbs toensure their removal and nonreturn .....................................................................................................................23 III. HAD@I]’S INDIVIDUAL CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY UNDER ARTICLES 7(1) AND 7(3) OF THE STATUTE.................................................................................................25 A. HAD`I}’S RESPONSIBILITY THROUGH HIS PARTICIPATION IN THE JCE ........................................25 1. Introduction............................................................................................................................25 (a) Had`i} significantly contributed to the implementation of the common criminal purpose ... 25 (i) Had`i} actively participated in crimes against non-Serbs .................................................. 26 (ii) Had`i} encouraged crimes by creating an environment of impunity ................................ 27 (iii)Had`i} failed to uphold his legal duties to ensure respect for the law and protection of non-Serbs .......................................................................................................................... 30 2. Had`i} shared the JCE intent.................................................................................................31 B. OTHER FORMS OF LIABILITY UNDER ARTICLE 7(1) .....................................................................31 C. HAD`I}’S SUPERIOR RESPONSIBILITY UNDER ARTICLE 7(3).......................................................33 1. Had`i}’s superior-subordinate relationshipover SerbForces inthe SAO SBWS/RSK .......33 2. Had`i}’s knowledge of the crimes committedbyhis subordinates.......................................34 3. Had`i}’s failure toprevent or punish.....................................................................................35 IV. THE CRIMES............................................................................................................................35 A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE STATUTE ........................................................35 1. Existence of anarmedconflict...............................................................................................35 2. Nexus betweenthe armedconflict andthe crimes.................................................................36 B. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 5 OF THE STATUTE ........................................................36 1. The attack...............................................................................................................................36 2. The widespreadand/or systematic nature of the attack .........................................................37 3. Civilianpopulation.................................................................................................................37 4. Had`i}’s acts formedpart of the attackandhe was aware that his acts formedpart of the attack ...................................................................................................................................37 5. Discriminatoryintent for persecutions...................................................................................37 C. THE CRIMES CHARGED................................................................................................................38 1. Dalj.........................................................................................................................................38 (a) Murder of 11 non-Serb detainees on 21 September 1991...................................................... 39 (b) Murder of 28 non-Serb detainees around 4 October 1991..................................................... 39 2. Erdut.......................................................................................................................................40 (a) Murder of twelve non-Serb detainees in Erdut on 10 November 1991.................................. 41 Case No. IT04-75PT 3 July 2012 Public Redacted IT-04-75-PT 7296 (b) Murder of three non-Serb detainees in Erdut after 9 November 1991................................... 41 (c) Murder of five non-Serb detainees on 11 November 1991.................................................... 42 (d) Murder of five non-Serb detainees on oraround 10 December 1991.................................... 42 (e) Murder of seven non-Serb detainees in Erdut on 26 December 1991.................................... 43 (f) Murder offour non-Serb detainees in Erdut on 21 February 1992 ........................................ 43 (g) Murder of Marija Sena{i in Erdut on 3 June 1992................................................................. 43 3. Aljma{....................................................................................................................................43 4. Sarva{.....................................................................................................................................44 5. BorovoSelo ...........................................................................................................................44 6. The Takeover of Vukovar......................................................................................................44 7. Attacks against Towns andVillages SouthandEast of the Cityof Vukovar .......................45 (a) Sotin ....................................................................................................................................... 46 (b) Tovarnik................................................................................................................................. 47 (c) Lovas ...................................................................................................................................... 47 (i) Murderof 21 Croats at a minefield on the outskirts of Lovas on 18 October 1991 ........... 49 (d) Bapska.................................................................................................................................... 50 (e) [arengrad................................................................................................................................ 50 (f) Ilok.......................................................................................................................................... 51 (g) Opatovac ................................................................................................................................ 52 8. The Fall of Vukovar andits Aftermath..................................................................................53 (a) Detention of hundreds of Croats and non-Serbs at Vukovar Hospital and at the JNA Vukovar barracks.................................................................................................................. 53 (b) Murder of at least 200 Croat and other non-Serbs in and around Ov~ara on 20-21 November 1991....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Supplemental Pre-Trial Brief of the Defence of Mićo Stanišić ______
    IT-08-91-PT 3153 D3153 - D3107 31 July 2009 SF THEU INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FORU THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA CaseU No. IT-08-91-PT INU THE TRIAL CHAMBERU Before: Judge Iain Bonomy, Presiding Judge Ole Bjørn Støle Judge Frederik Harhoff Registrar: Mr. John Hocking Date Filed: 31 July 2009 THE PROSECUTOR v. MIĆO STANIŠIĆ STOJAN ŽUPLJANIN PUBLIC CONFIDENTIAL ANNEXES A, B, and C ________________________________________________________________________ SUPPLEMENTAL PRE-TRIAL BRIEF OF THE DEFENCE OF MIĆO STANIŠIĆ ________________________________________________________________________ TheU Office of the ProsecutorU Mr. Thomas Hannis Ms. Joanna Korner QC CounselU for the AccusedU Mr. Slobodan Zečević and Mr. Slobodan Cvijetić for Mr. Mićo Stanišić Mr. Igor Pantelić for Mr. Stojan Župljanin 3152 SUPPLEMENTAL PRE-TRIAL BRIEF OF THE DEFENCE OF MIĆO STANIŠIĆ 1. At all times relevant to the indictment, Mr. Stanišić was the Minister of the Serbian Ministry of Internal Affairs in Bosnia and Herzegovina (“RS MUP”). He is charged under Article 7(1) of the Statute with committing – as a participant in a joint criminal enterprise (“JCE”) – instigating and aiding and abetting the crimes alleged in the indictment and under Article 7(3) of the Statute as a superior authority who failed to prevent or punish the crimes alleged in indictment. 2. Pursuant to Rule 65ter(F)(i) the Defence Pre-Trial Brief makes the following written statement setting out, in general terms, the nature of his defence: a. Mr. Stanišić never acted criminally nor did ever harbour or manifest any criminal intent. b. Legally and factually, there was no JCE as alleged by the Prosecution and Mr. Stanišić was never a part of any JCE or common plan to permanently remove Bosnian Muslims, Bosnian Croats, and other non-Serb from the territory of the planned Serbian state by means which included the commission of the crimes alleged in the indictment.
    [Show full text]
  • FEEFHS Journal Volume VII No. 1-2 1999
    FEEFHS Quarterly A Journal of Central & Bast European Genealogical Studies FEEFHS Quarterly Volume 7, nos. 1-2 FEEFHS Quarterly Who, What and Why is FEEFHS? Tue Federation of East European Family History Societies Editor: Thomas K. Ecllund. [email protected] (FEEFHS) was founded in June 1992 by a small dedicated group Managing Editor: Joseph B. Everett. [email protected] of American and Canadian genealogists with diverse ethnic, reli- Contributing Editors: Shon Edwards gious, and national backgrounds. By the end of that year, eleven Daniel Schlyter societies bad accepted its concept as founding members. Each year Emily Schulz since then FEEFHS has doubled in size. FEEFHS nows represents nearly two hundred organizations as members from twenty-four FEEFHS Executive Council: states, five Canadian provinces, and fourteen countries. lt contin- 1998-1999 FEEFHS officers: ues to grow. President: John D. Movius, c/o FEEFHS (address listed below). About half of these are genealogy societies, others are multi-pur- [email protected] pose societies, surname associations, book or periodical publish- 1st Vice-president: Duncan Gardiner, C.G., 12961 Lake Ave., ers, archives, libraries, family history centers, on-line services, in- Lakewood, OH 44107-1533. [email protected] stitutions, e-mail genealogy list-servers, heraldry societies, and 2nd Vice-president: Laura Hanowski, c/o Saskatchewan Genealogi- other ethnic, religious, and national groups. FEEFHS includes or- cal Society, P.0. Box 1894, Regina, SK, Canada S4P 3EI ganizations representing all East or Central European groups that [email protected] have existing genealogy societies in North America and a growing 3rd Vice-president: Blanche Krbechek, 2041 Orkla Drive, group of worldwide organizations and individual members, from Minneapolis, MN 55427-3429.
    [Show full text]
  • The Yugoslav National Army Role in the Aggression Against the Republic of Croatia from 1990 to 1992
    The Yugoslav National Army Role in the Aggression Against the Republic of Croatia from 1990 to 1992 Davor Marijan ABSTRACT The essay analyses the role of the Yugoslav National Army (JNA) in the war waged against Croatia from 1990 to 1992. The author draws atten - tion to the fact that from the end of the 1980s, the JNA was an active party to the Serbian expansionist aspirations that gripped Yugoslavia after Titos death. The Armys role is chronicled from the point of Croatias democratisation in 1990 to its retreat in the spring of 1992, after having only partially executed the tasks that Serbian expansionist policy had dele- gated. Following the death of Josip Broz Tito in 1980, the Socialist Federative Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY) entered the crisis-ridden 1980s. This decade was marked by incidents in Kosovo in 1981 and 1989, chronic economic crisis, and a rise in Serbian expan- sionist nationalism directed towards the federal state, which had been defined and formally adopted with the enactment of the 1974 Constitution. The Yugoslav National Armys involvement served to show that Serbian expansionist ideas had deeply affect- ed even that institution, in which Serbs dominated1, and which had *All afore-mentioned documents, unless otherwise specified, can be found in the pos- session of the Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Croatia. 1. Am omni-present characteristic of the Yugoslav National Army during the entire course of its existence is the uneven structure of national representation in its com- missioned officers corps, particularly among generals and higher ranking officer personnel. Prior to the war, Croatians in percentages comprised 12.6% of the Army population, which when compared with their representation in SFRYs population 143 NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE FUTURE 3-4 (2) 2001, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial of the Republic of Croatia
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CASE CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (CROATIA v. YUGOSLAVIA) MEMORIAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA ANNEXES REGIONAL FILES VOLUME 2 PART I EASTERN SLAVONIA 1 MARCH 2001 II CONTENTS ETHNIC STRUCTURES 1 Eastern Slavonia 3 Tenja 4 Antin 5 Dalj 6 Berak 7 Bogdanovci 8 Šarengrad 9 Ilok 10 Tompojevci 11 Bapska 12 Tovarnik 13 Sotin 14 Lovas 15 Tordinci 16 Vukovar 17 WITNESS STATEMENTS TENJA 19 Annex 1: Witness Statement of M.K. 21 Annex 2: Witness Statement of R.J. 22 Annex 3: Witness Statement of I.K. (1) 24 Annex 4: Witness Statement of J.P. 29 Annex 5: Witness Statement of L.B. 34 Annex 6: Witness Statement of P.Š. 35 Annex 7: Witness Statement of D.M. 37 Annex 8: Witness Statement of M.R. 39 Annex 9: Witness Statement of M.M. 39 Annex 10: Witness Statement of M.K. 41 Annex 11: Witness Statement of I.I.* 42 Annex 12: Witness Statement of Z.B. 52 Annex 13: Witness Statement of A.M. 54 Annex 14: Witness Statement of J.S. 56 Annex 15: Witness Statement of Z.M. 58 Annex 16: Witness Statement of J.K. 60 IV Annex 17: Witness Statement of L.R. 63 Annex 18: Witness Statement of Đ.B. 64 WITNESS STATEMENTS DALJ 67 Annex 19: Witness Statement of J.P. 69 Annex 20: Witness Statement of I.K. (2) 71 Annex 21: Witness Statement of A.K. 77 Annex 22: Witness Statement of H.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Slobodan MILOSEVIC
    IT-02-54-T p.370i7 j)3)",j--1>'~,s-Jsf-­ 2~ ..)I.o(.l~ 7.,'( THE ,INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL· FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA CASE NO.]T·02·54·T THE PROSECUTOR OF.THE TRIBUNAL AGAINST SLOBODANMILOSEVIC SECOND AMENDED INDICTMENT . 'i,.-I";·",; " Tht?,prqs~~tl,tor,pf.'!J1~.: lnt~mational Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, pursuant to lIer authority under Article 18 of the Statute of the,.:Wte.w,!-~ipJ1,".gq¥¥nal,Tribunal for the Fonner. Yugoslavia ("the Statute ofthe Tribunal") charges: . f· SLOBODAN MILOSEVIC" with CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, GRAVE BREACHES OF THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS, anq"VIQLAJ'~QNSi'\OF THE LAWS OR CUSTOMS OF WAR as setforth b~Io~:' .,.....' ." . .'-,~ THE ACCUSED: ",,~,,',,;\:.'.~,::qf~';>i;,<·::·,:~,"(-<\''-::''';)~,f.";{~(,::;,':, '",,:._:',:,,_,~ .;, ,_.~\_,,:-::~,;;;, ~;'<,' 1. .....' SJ,o'bO~MItOSEVI<;",sqn. of~vetoz;fU" ,Milosey~c,.':Vasbom on 2,Q,'f\»g4sti.J94l.iIl" :£>gz~evaq,jQipresfmkda~"Serbia~ ,,'In j964~,h~ ""'",,,,,~. ;;,:":"",,,,::t:.n-"'_'>-:~'.-,_.;,:i!·.\'.·' __ ':"~)';~":""'.'.""'" .,. '.' .. j-....'.' ...••' '" "".,' _'. ' ..• -' .•',.' ." .. , ...... ,., ,,',\ ", "'."'" gI;~~atedfrdm th~~<:l;W F"sulty, of the University of. B,el~ade. and began a career in management and batiking. Until 1978,~eI1eld·the'p()stsOf deputy director and later;g,eqeral< $f~~tOJ;",fit:rehnogits; arrlitjor oil company in the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia ("SPRY"). 1'llereaft~~fHr p,~~e pr,~§idtWtof'1J.~l?8r,a(ls~kaplcq (B,~l!.~Clf1,ka,~"Q,pe,Of., thelarg~st\bap,lfsm th~. SF?}X, aIJ9~~~e ~~l? ~t~l,:,l?~3,·" . ',_ ,'-':: >: ,:: J:~<, < ,I.:,:" ~::'-:: ',)j~i".') '\,••i "~{'" ';;,/,~,~> :"~: "",~ <,.iJ (;,"<,'."'l,',., \ .. ,/,; 2~ Slobodan MILOSEVIC joined' the League of Communists of Yugoslavia in 1959. In 1984, he beCame Chairman of the City Colllpljttee.of.the.League\of'Commtlnists ·ofBelgiade.In 1986, he was electedthait.Inan of the Presidium of the Central Committee of the IT-02-54-T p.37016 League ofCommunists of Serbia and was re-electedin 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • Goran Hadžić
    NOT AN OFFICIAL DOCUMENT CASE INFORMATION SHEET (IT-04-75) GORAN HADŽIĆ GORAN HADŽIĆ Indicted for persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds; extermination; murder; torture; inhumane acts; deportation and forcible transfer; cruel treatment; wanton destruction of villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity; destruction or wilful damage done to institutions dedicated to education and religion; and plunder of public or private property President of the Government of the self-proclaimed Serbian Autonomous District Slavonia, Baranja and Western Srem (SAO SBWS) and subsequently President of the Republic of Serbian Krajina (RSK). - Still at large Crimes indicted for (examples): Persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds; extermination; murder; torture; inhumane acts; deportation and forcible transfer (crimes against humanity) Murder; torture; cruel treatment; wanton destruction of villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity; destruction or wilful damage done to institutions dedicated to education and religion; and plunder of public or private property (violations of laws or customs of war) From 1 August 1991 until the end of June 1992, Goran Hadžić, acting individually or in concert with other known and unknown members of a joint criminal enterprise, planned, instigated, ordered, committed, or otherwise aided and abetted the planning, preparation, or execution of the persecutions of the Croat and other non-Serb civilian population in the SAO SBWS / RSK. These persecutions were based on political, racial or religious grounds and included the following: • The extermination or murder of hundreds of Croat and other non-Serb civilians, including women and elderly persons, in Dalj, Dalj Planina, Erdut, Erdut Planina, Klisa, Lovas, Grabovac and Vukovar.
    [Show full text]
  • Slavonske Šume Kroz Povijest
    SLAVONSKE ŠUME KROZ POVIJEST HRVATSKI INSTITUT ZA POVIJEST PODRUŽNICA ZA POVIJEST SLAVONIJE, SRIJEMA I BARANJE Slavonske šume kroz povijest BIBLIOTHECA CROATICA: SLAVONICA, SIRMIENSIA ET BARANYENSIA Posebna izdanja Knjiga 17 _______________________________________________________________________ Nakladnik: Hrvatski institut za povijest – Podružnica za povijest Slavonije, Srijema i Baranje, Slavonski Brod Za nakladnika: Stanko Andrić © Nakladnik i Autori radova u zborniku Recenzenti: Damir Karbić Hrvoje Petrić Lektura: Slavko Sušilović Prijevod sažetaka: Mica Orban Kljajić Grafi čka priprema: Krešendo, Osijek ISBN 978-953-8102-11-0 Izradu i elektroničko izdanje ove knjige fi nancirala je Hrvatska zaklada za znanost istraživačkim projektom IP 2014-09-6719. Slika na koricama: Adolf Waldinger, Slavonska šuma, 1866., ulje na platnu 34 x 98 cm, Muzej likovnih umjetnosti Osijek, S-232 Slavonske šume kroz povijest Zbornik radova znanstvenog skupa s međunarodnim sudjelovanjem održanog u Slavonskom Brodu 1.-2. listopada 2015. Uredili Dinko Župan i Robert Skenderović Slavonski Brod, 2017. Sadržaj Predgovor ........................................................................................................................7 Program skupa ...............................................................................................................9 Josip Parat: Šume i drveće u antici južne Panonije .......................................................................15 Hrvoje Gračanin i Silvija Pisk: Pisani izvori o šumama u savsko-dravskom međuriječju
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter VII: the Formation of the Republika Srpska and the Policy of Ethnic Separation in Bosnia and Herzegovina
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) The unfinished trial of Slobodan Milošević: Justice lost, history told Vrkić, N. Publication date 2015 Document Version Final published version Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Vrkić, N. (2015). The unfinished trial of Slobodan Milošević: Justice lost, history told. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:06 Oct 2021 Why do you want to make Serbia and Serbs responsible for the war in Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina? ...[The international community] broke up Yugoslavia... and now they want all three peoples in Bosnia and Herzegovina to foot the bill... Slobodan Milošević, Opening Statement, 14 February
    [Show full text]
  • Conseil De L'europe Council of Europe Cour
    CONSEIL COUNCIL DE L’EUROPE OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FOURTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 17837/03 by Milovan TOMIC against the United Kingdom The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 14 October 2003 as a Chamber composed of: Mr M. PELLONPÄÄ, President, Sir Nicolas BRATZA, Mr M. FISCHBACH, Mr J. CASADEVALL, Mr S. PAVLOVSCHI, Mr J. BORREGO BORREGO, Mrs E. FURA-SANDSTRÖM, judges, and Mr M. O’BOYLE, Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 9 June 2003, Having deliberated, decides as follows: 2 TOMIC v. THE UNITED KINGDOM DECISION THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Milovan Tomic, is a Croatian national, who was born in 1962 and, at the time of lodging the application, was detained in Bedford police station. He was represented before the Court by Ms Savic, a solicitor practising in London. A. The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. The applicant is an ethnic Serb from Croatia, brought up in Vinkovci in the region of Eastern Slavonia which was at the time in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. In 1990, the applicant was beaten up by Croatian police because of his Serb origin and was unable to walk for two weeks. In April 1991, the applicant joined the Territorial Defence Unit set up by Serbs when it became clear that war was imminent. On 25 June 1991, Croatia declared independence. Hostilities followed with the Yugoslav Republic and the Serb minority living in Croatia.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Su Finansirali
    Program su finansirali: grad Obrovac, Srpsko narodno vijeće iz Zagreba, Zajedničko vijeće opštine Vukovar, Komesarijat za izbeglice i migracije Beograd, Fond za izbegla, prognana i raseljena lica AP Vojvodine, Savjet za nacionalne manjine Republike Hrvatske, Uprava za saradnju s dijasporom i Srbima u regionu. Sadržaj publikacije ne predstavlja odgovornost sponzora i ni u kom slučaju ne odražava njihove stavove. Sto godina srpsko-hrvatskih odnosa (1918-2018), dominantni narativi i kulture sećanja One Hundred Years of Serb-Croat Relations (1918-2018): Dominant Narratives and the Cultures of Remembrance CENTAR ZA ISTORIJU, DEMOKRATIJU I POMIRENJE – NOVI SAD UDRUGA ZA POVIJEST, SURADNJU I POMIRENJE-GOLUBIĆ (OBROVAČKI) NOVI SAD, 2018. SADRŽAJ Darko Gavrilović KREIRANJE ISTORIJE MRŽNJE; DOMINANTNI NARATIVI KAO POTENCIJALNI DISTRIBUTERI MEĐUNACIONANIH TENZIJA IZMEĐU SRBA I HRVATA 7 Aleksandar Stojanović KVISLING ILI SRPSKI HEROJ? LIČNOST I DELO MILANA NEDIĆA U SRPSKIM MEDIJIMA I DISKURSU U VREME TRAJANJA SUDSKOG PROCESA ZA NJEGOVU REHABILITACIJU 21 Vjeran Pavlaković CROATIA’S CONTESTED MEMORYSCAPE 37 Bruno Vignjević SLOJEVI SJEĆANJA: HISTORIOGRAFSKE KONTROVERZE ANTIFAŠISTIČKIH KOMEMORACIJA U BREZOVICI I SRBU 69 Dino Buljat HRVATSKO- SRPSKI ODNOSI U HRVATSKOM (ANTI)RATNOM FILMU- IZGRADNJA KOLEKTIVNOG IDENTITETA FILMSKIM INTERPRETIRANJEM POVIJESTI 79 Filip Škiljan IDENTITET I SJEĆANJE: PRIMJER SRBA U ZAGREBAČKOJ ŽUPANIJI 93 KREIRANJE ISTORIJE MRŽNJE; DOMINANTNI NARATIVI KAO POTENCIJALNI DISTRIBUTERI MEĐUNACIONANIH TENZIJA IZMEĐU SRBA I HRVATA Darko Gavrilović KREIRANJE ISTORIJE MRŽNJE; DOMINANTNI NARATIVI KAO PO- TENCIJALNI DISTRIBUTERI MEĐUNACIONANIH TENZIJA IZMEĐU SRBA I HRVATA Apstrakt Autor će u radu nastojati da predstavi neke od dominantnih narativa kojima se manipuliše u udžbenicima istorije u Hrvatskoj i Srbiji. Namera mu je da ukaže na njihove različitosti i istovetnosti, ali i na moć političkih zloupotreba njima i na nji- hov potencijal u mogućim sukobima u budućnosti.
    [Show full text]
  • Naredba O Granicama Ribolovinih Područja I Ribolovnih Zona
    NN 91/03 MINISTARSTVO POLJOPRIVREDE I ŠUMARSTVA 1160 Na temelju članka 4. stavka 3. Zakona o slatkovodnom ribarstvu (»Narodne novine«, br. 106/01), ministar poljoprivrede i šumarstva donosi NAREDBU O GRANICAMA RIBOLOVNIH PODRUČJA I RIBOLOVNIH ZONA Članak 1. (1) Ovom Naredbom određuju se granice ribolovnih područja i ribolovnih zona na ribolovnim vodama Republike Hrvatske. (2) Granice ribolovnih područja iz stavka 1. ovog članka određene su prema slivnim područjima koja predstavljaju biološke, hidrografske i gospodarske cjeline. (3) Granice ribolovnih zona iz stavka 1. ovog članka određene su administrativnim granicama gradova i općina, osim u gradu Zagrebu koji se dijeli na ribolovne zone: Istok, Zapad, Sjever, Jug i Sesvete. (4) Ribolovna područja i ribolovne zone iz stavka 1. ovoga članka obuhvaćaju sve ribolovne vode na pojedinom ribolovnom području ili u ribolovnoj zoni. (5) Iznimno od odredbe stavaka 3. i 4., ovoga članka, ribolovnom zonom se može proglasiti i manja ribolovna voda koja predstavlja zasebnu biološku i hidrološku cjelinu. Članak 2. Ribolovne vode iz članka 1. ove Naredbe dijele se na sljedeća ribolovna područja: I. RIBOLOVNO PODRUČJE DRAVA – DUNAV Županije: Varaždinska, Međimurska, Koprivničko-križevačka, Virovitičko-podravska, Osječko-baranjska i dio Vukovarsko- -srijemske županije (gradovi Vukovar i Ilok; općine Trpinja, Borovo, Bogdanovci, Tompojevci, Negoslavci, Markušica, Tovarnik i Lovas). II. RIBOLOVNO PODRUČJE SAVA Županije: Krapinsko-zagorska, Zagrebačka, Sisačko-moslavačka, Bjelovarsko-bilogorska, Požeško-slavonska,
    [Show full text]
  • Competition Between Minority Ethnic Parties in Post-Conflict Countries
    Competition Between Minority Ethnic Parties in Post-conflict Countries: Performance of Minority Parties in Croatia and Macedonia by Dane Taleski Submitted to Central European University Department of Political Science In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Supervisor: András Bozóki Budapest, September 2014 1 ABSTRACT Academic and policy studies argue that an inclusive approach is needed for sustainable peacebuilding. This justifies the inclusion of former combatants into political parties, but some argue that it can have negative consequences for democratization. Institutional engineering is proposed to forge cross-cutting parties; however it is puzzling to find that parties from rebels often dominate in the post-conflict period. To address this puzzle I look at minority ethnic parties in post-conflict Croatia and Macedonia. SDSS dominates the competition between Serb parties in Croatia and DUI dominates between Albanian parties in Macedonia. To answer why this is so, I first look at the process of their formation and functioning and second I compared them to other minority parties. Despite the common history in Yugoslavia, the inter-ethnic conflicts, the post-conflict conditions and institutional environments for minority politics were very different in Croatia and Macedonia. My level of analysis is the competition between minority parties in each country. Because of the similar outcomes, under varying conditions, I consider that the finding in one country control for the other. Using process tracing I analyzed data from 78 interviews, party content, media and archival sources. The findings were corroborated with quantitative analysis of electoral data from national and sub- national elections in the entire post-conflict period.
    [Show full text]