Prosecution Pre-Trial Brief

Prosecution Pre-Trial Brief

IT-04-75-PT 7298 UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No. IT-04-75-PT Prosecutionof Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of Date: 3July2012 International HumanitarianLaw Committedinthe Territoryof the former Yugoslavia since 1991 IN TRIAL CHAMBER II Before: Judge GuyDelvoie, Presiding Judge BurtonHall Judge Antoine Kesia-Mbe Mindua Registrar: Mr John Hocking Date: 3July2012 THE PROSECUTOR v. GORAN HAD@I] PUBLIC REDACTED PROSECUTION PRE-TRIAL BRIEF The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Douglas Stringer Counsel for the Accused: Mr. Zoran@ivanovi} Mr. Christopher Gosnell IT-04-75-PT 7297 I. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................1 II. THE JOINT CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE (JCE).......................................................................2 A. COMMON CRIMINAL PURPOSE.......................................................................................................2 B. HAD`I} WAS A JCE MEMBER ........................................................................................................2 C. OTHER JCE MEMBERS ..................................................................................................................3 D. HAD`I} WORKED WITH OTHER JCE MEMBERS TO CREATE ETHNIC-SERB TERRITORIES IN CROATIA ....................................................................................................................................6 E. THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON CRIMINAL PURPOSE .......................................................8 1. Patternof crimes ......................................................................................................................9 2. The establishment of SAO SBWS .........................................................................................13 3. The creationof separate Serbpolice andmilitarystructures inSBWS.................................14 4. The deployment of MUP/SDB-sponsoredunits andpersonnel toSBWS.............................16 5. The incorporationof volunteers from Serbia.........................................................................18 6. The interventionof the JNA toprotect Serbinterests............................................................19 7. The SAO Krajina andSAO WesternSlavonia ......................................................................20 8. The RSK andthe Vance Plan.................................................................................................21 9. The implementationof discriminatorypolicies against nonSerbs toensure their removal and nonreturn .....................................................................................................................23 III. HAD@I]’S INDIVIDUAL CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY UNDER ARTICLES 7(1) AND 7(3) OF THE STATUTE.................................................................................................25 A. HAD`I}’S RESPONSIBILITY THROUGH HIS PARTICIPATION IN THE JCE ........................................25 1. Introduction............................................................................................................................25 (a) Had`i} significantly contributed to the implementation of the common criminal purpose ... 25 (i) Had`i} actively participated in crimes against non-Serbs .................................................. 26 (ii) Had`i} encouraged crimes by creating an environment of impunity ................................ 27 (iii)Had`i} failed to uphold his legal duties to ensure respect for the law and protection of non-Serbs .......................................................................................................................... 30 2. Had`i} shared the JCE intent.................................................................................................31 B. OTHER FORMS OF LIABILITY UNDER ARTICLE 7(1) .....................................................................31 C. HAD`I}’S SUPERIOR RESPONSIBILITY UNDER ARTICLE 7(3).......................................................33 1. Had`i}’s superior-subordinate relationshipover SerbForces inthe SAO SBWS/RSK .......33 2. Had`i}’s knowledge of the crimes committedbyhis subordinates.......................................34 3. Had`i}’s failure toprevent or punish.....................................................................................35 IV. THE CRIMES............................................................................................................................35 A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE STATUTE ........................................................35 1. Existence of anarmedconflict...............................................................................................35 2. Nexus betweenthe armedconflict andthe crimes.................................................................36 B. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 5 OF THE STATUTE ........................................................36 1. The attack...............................................................................................................................36 2. The widespreadand/or systematic nature of the attack .........................................................37 3. Civilianpopulation.................................................................................................................37 4. Had`i}’s acts formedpart of the attackandhe was aware that his acts formedpart of the attack ...................................................................................................................................37 5. Discriminatoryintent for persecutions...................................................................................37 C. THE CRIMES CHARGED................................................................................................................38 1. Dalj.........................................................................................................................................38 (a) Murder of 11 non-Serb detainees on 21 September 1991...................................................... 39 (b) Murder of 28 non-Serb detainees around 4 October 1991..................................................... 39 2. Erdut.......................................................................................................................................40 (a) Murder of twelve non-Serb detainees in Erdut on 10 November 1991.................................. 41 Case No. IT04-75PT 3 July 2012 Public Redacted IT-04-75-PT 7296 (b) Murder of three non-Serb detainees in Erdut after 9 November 1991................................... 41 (c) Murder of five non-Serb detainees on 11 November 1991.................................................... 42 (d) Murder of five non-Serb detainees on oraround 10 December 1991.................................... 42 (e) Murder of seven non-Serb detainees in Erdut on 26 December 1991.................................... 43 (f) Murder offour non-Serb detainees in Erdut on 21 February 1992 ........................................ 43 (g) Murder of Marija Sena{i in Erdut on 3 June 1992................................................................. 43 3. Aljma{....................................................................................................................................43 4. Sarva{.....................................................................................................................................44 5. BorovoSelo ...........................................................................................................................44 6. The Takeover of Vukovar......................................................................................................44 7. Attacks against Towns andVillages SouthandEast of the Cityof Vukovar .......................45 (a) Sotin ....................................................................................................................................... 46 (b) Tovarnik................................................................................................................................. 47 (c) Lovas ...................................................................................................................................... 47 (i) Murderof 21 Croats at a minefield on the outskirts of Lovas on 18 October 1991 ........... 49 (d) Bapska.................................................................................................................................... 50 (e) [arengrad................................................................................................................................ 50 (f) Ilok.......................................................................................................................................... 51 (g) Opatovac ................................................................................................................................ 52 8. The Fall of Vukovar andits Aftermath..................................................................................53 (a) Detention of hundreds of Croats and non-Serbs at Vukovar Hospital and at the JNA Vukovar barracks.................................................................................................................. 53 (b) Murder of at least 200 Croat and other non-Serbs in and around Ov~ara on 20-21 November 1991....................................................................................................................

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    156 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us