DOCSLIB.ORG

STATE of the WATERSHED – Report on Surface Water Quality the Ventura River Watershed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
STATE of the WATERSHED – Report on Surface Water Quality the Ventura River Watershed STATE OF THE WATERSHED – Report on Surface Water Quality The Ventura River Watershed California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Los Angeles Region May 2002 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................................................................... 4 STATE OF THE WATERSHED............................................................................................................... 6 Physical Description of River, Subwatersheds, Reservoirs, and Structures .................................... 7 Groundwater Basins....................................................................................................................... 13 Flows and Precipitation.................................................................................................................. 15 Water Agencies and Water Use ..................................................................................................... 17 Historical Events/Development in Watershed ............................................................................... 19 Biological Setting .......................................................................................................................... 22 Water Resources and Beneficial Uses ........................................................................................... 27 Stakeholder Groups........................................................................................................................ 31 Population, Jurisdictional, and Land Use Characteristics.............................................................. 32 Chronology of Studies, Plans, and Regulations............................................................................. 36 Discharges into the Watershed....................................................................................................... 40 Current Water Quality Impairments .............................................................................................. 41 Historical Water Quality................................................................................................................ 42 Existing Monitoring Programs....................................................................................................... 43 Overview of Existing Monitoring Data ......................................................................................... 46 Recommendations for Future Water Quality Monitoring.............................................................. 51 Summary of Water Quality and Quantity Issues ........................................................................... 51 Regional Board and Other Agency Programs................................................................................ 55 BIBLIOGRAPHY ..................................................................................................................................... 64 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Ventura River and its tributaries drain a coastal watershed in western Ventura Ventura County. The watershed covers a Los Angeles Co. Co. fan-shaped area of 235 square miles, which is situated within the western Ventura River Watershed Transverse Ranges (the only major east- west mountain ranges in the continental U.S.). From the upper slopes of the Transverse Ranges, the surface water system in the Ventura River watershed generally flows in a southerly direction to an estuary, located at the mouth of the Ventura River. Groundwater basins composed of alluvial aquifers deposited along the surface water system, are highly interconnected with the surface water system and are quickly recharged or depleted, according to surface flow conditions. Topography in the watershed is rugged and as a result, the surface waters that drain the watershed have very steep gradients, ranging from 40 feet per mile at the mouth to 150 feet per mile at the headwaters. Precipitation varies widely in the watershed. Beneficial Uses in Watershed: Most occurs as rainfall during just a few storms, Estuary Above Estuary between November and Navigation Municipal supply Commercial & sportfishing Industrial service supply March. Summer and fall Estuarine habitat Industrial process supply months are typically dry. Marine habitat Agricultural supply Although snow occurs at Contact & noncontact water recreation Contact & noncontact water recreation higher elevations, Warmwater habitat Warmwater habitat melting snowpack does Wildlife habitat Wildlife habitat not sustain significant Preservation of rare & endangered species Preservation of rare & endangered species Migratory & spawning habitat Migratory & spawning habitat runoff in warmer months. Wetlands habitat Wetlands habitat The erratic weather Shellfish harvesting Coldwater habitat pattern, coupled with the Groundwater recharge steep gradients Freshwater replenishment throughout most of the watershed, result in high flow velocities with most runoff reaching the ocean. The majority of water quality problems involve eutrophication (excessive nutrients and effects), especially in the estuary/lagoon although some DDT and metals have been found in mussel and fish tissue (on the 303(d) list for these). A TMDL is currently scheduled for 2004/05 to address algae problems. A large storm drain enters the river near the estuary and homeless persons live in and frequent the river bed. Sediment in the estuary, however, appears relatively uncontaminated and little sediment toxicity is apparent. In some subwatersheds, high TDS concentrations impair the use of water for agriculture. The 4 watershed's water quality problems are, for the most part, nonpoint The Ventura River Watershed source-related. There have also been incidents of releases of toxic materials into storm drains entering the lower river. • 5 NPDES discharges: one major (POTW) and four discharges covered Water diversions, dams, and groundwater pumping also are thought to by general permits limit surface water resources needed to support a high quality fishery. • 21 dischargers covered under an industrial storm water permit Reduced water supplies affect water quality and thus beneficial uses, • 4 dischargers covered under a particularly with regards to the endangered steelhead trout (steelhead construction storm water permit trout are known to utilize the River and some of its tributaries • Eutrophication concerns, especially in historically supported annual steelhead runs of 5000 – 6000 adults). lagoon Removal of the Matilija Dam (upper river) has recently been identified • Some bioaccumulation of DDT and as a high priority. metals • TDS concerns in some subwatersheds • Impediments to steelhead trout There is only one major discharger, a small POTW (3.0 MGD) in the migration (but much high quality middle reach of the Ventura River which has recently upgraded to habitat) tertiary treatment The treatment plant effluent had been implicated in • More nonpoint source rather than nuisance growth of aquatic plants and low dissolved oxygen found at point source problems times downstream of the discharge. For much of the year, the facility's effluent can make up two-thirds of the total river flow. The most recent monitoring has shown the quality of the effluent has significantly improved with regards to nutrients. DO levels in the river have also improved dramatically and algal growth is greatly reduced below the plant; however, nonpoint sources (agriculture and horse stables) still appear to be contributing to algal growth above the plant. There are four minor NPDES dischargers under general permits and 27 dischargers are enrolled under the general industrial storm water permit in the watershed. Permits in the watershed were targeted for renewal in FY 2000/01. In August 1997, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) listed the steelhead trout in Southern California as endangered under the Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). The listing means that any project or action that may affect steelhead trout or their habitats will require consultation with NMFS to obtain an incidental take permit. In order to prepare for the listing and deal with possible regulatory requirements as a result of the listing, the Casitas MWD, City of Ventura, Ventura County Flood Control District, and seven other local public and private agencies collaborated and developed the Ventura River Steelhead Restoration and Recovery Plan in December 1997. The plan also contains large amount of background information on the watershed such as hydrology, biology, steelhead habitat conditions, and the operations and maintenance of water, wastewater, solid waste, transportation and flood control facilities of the sponsoring agencies. The same public agencies have joined together in a cooperative effort to develop a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) for their activities in and adjacent to the Ventura River. 5 STATE OF THE WATERSHED Watershed management is an integrated strategy for managing resources. As characteristics and resources vary widely from watershed to watershed, this strategy customizes efforts to manage resources and address problems unique to each watershed. Watershed management can be applied on many different levels, from an overall system for managing resources, restoring and protecting aquatic ecosystems, and protecting human health, to a more focussed effort that addresses one resource, such as water. The scope of the Regional Board's approach is limited to the quality of water resources in the Ventura River watershed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Baer Survey Specialist Report Format
    Thomas Fire 2017-2018, Los Padres National Forest BAER Hydrology Report Resource Specialty: Hydrology Fire Name: Thomas Fires Month and Year: December 2017-January 2018 Author(s) Name and Home unit Name: Emily Fudge, Cleveland National Forest Objectives This assessment focused on evaluating possible post-fire hydrologic threats to potential values at risk for the Thomas Fire on the Los Padres National Forest, Santa Barbara County, California. Hydrologic post-fire threats include post-fire flooding, slope instability, and bulking of flows from sediment and debris. Potential threats also include avulsion on depositional fans and catchment outlets due to bulked flows (rapid relocation of channel location); braiding of channels, scour, and channel migration. I. Potential Values at Risk Initial potential Values at Risk (VARs) identified for evaluation for the Thomas Fire are listed below. See VAR spreadsheet in the 2500-8 for detailed list of evaluated values at risk (VARs). During preliminary reconnaissance, it was recognized that whole communities, major highways and roads, and privately owned infrastructure downstream/slope of the Thomas Fire could be affected by post-fire effects. A State Watershed Emergency Response Team (WERT) was tasked with conducting an assessment of VARs on non-FS lands including all these areas. This BAER assessment focuses on VARs owned by the Forest Service or located on FS lands. An initial BAER assessment considered VARs in the Ojai and Wheeler Ridge areas so these areas are excluded from this report. This assessment does not include assessment of post-fire impacts within the Adams Canyon, Harmon Canyon, Arundell Barranca, or Lower Ventura River HUC 6 watersheds.
    [Show full text]
  • Friends of Ventura River
    C ALIFORNIA Ventura River T HREAT: DAM Summary The Risk Matilija Dam not only stands in the way of The Matilija Dam is a 200-foot high concrete the Ventura River’s endangered southern steel- arched structure that is owned by the Ventura head; it also prevents much-needed sand and County Flood Control District. It was built in sediment from flowing downstream and 1947 as part of the river’s flood control system replenishing popular southern California surf- and to provide water for the Ojai Valley. The ing beaches. While it is easy to find wide- dam lacks fish passage, so southern steelhead spread support for removing the dam, it will are blocked from approximately 50 percent of be harder to find money to complete the task. their historical spawning and rearing habitat. Federal, state, and local authorities must agree The fish were listed as endangered under the that removing the dam is a top priority and federal Endangered Species Act in 1997. must work together to find the necessary Because a massive amount of silt has built funds. up behind the structure, Matilija Dam no longer provides flood control benefits and pro- The River vides only minimal water storage capacity. The mainstem of the Ventura River flows The reservoir, which originally held 7,000 approximately 16 miles from the confluence acre-feet of water, now holds only 500 acre- of Matilija Creek and North Fork Matilija feet — and the storage capacity continues to Creek (located within the Los Padres National decrease. An estimated 5 million to 7 million Forest) to the Pacific Ocean near the City of cubic yards of sediment is backed up behind Ventura.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 10 Water Resources
    Chapter 10 Water Resources Water Resources 2040 General Plan 10 WATER RESOURCES INTRODUCTION This chapter summarizes the various water resources and water resource issues in Ventura County. It is organized into the following sections: ▪ Major Findings (Section 10.1) ▪ Legal and Regulatory Framework for Water Management (Section 10.2) ▪ Integrated Regional Water Management (0) ▪ Existing Conditions (by watershed) (Section 10.4) ▪ Trends and Future Conditions (Section 10.5) ▪ Key Terms (Section 10.6) ▪ References (Section 10.7) The organization of this chapter differs from others in the Background Report because of the nature of its subject matter. First, because the overall legal and regulatory framework affecting water resources is key to understanding how such resources are managed, the framework is the first substantive discussion in this chapter. Second, because water resources are so integrally tied to geography, the existing conditions discussions are organized according to the county’s watersheds, with each aspect of the resource addressed as it relates uniquely to each watershed. MAJOR FINDINGS Adequate water supply is a current and ongoing concern in Ventura County due to climate change and drought, the related declines in river flows and reservoir levels, historic overdraft of several local groundwater basins, curtailment of groundwater supplies in southern Ventura County, new groundwater well prohibitions, and reduced deliveries of imported water. More than 850,000 residents and 156 square miles (95,802 acres) of irrigated farmland in Ventura County experienced direct impacts from the drought that began in 2012. ▪ The water supply challenges are great and could impact residents, businesses, agriculture, and the environmental resources of Ventura County without concerted action.
    [Show full text]
  • Ventura River Steelhead Restoration and Recovery Plan
    VENTURA RIVER STEELHEAD RESTORATION AND RECOVERY PLAN Prepared for: Casitas Municipal Water District, City of San Buenaventura, Ventura County Flood Control District, Ventura County Transportation Department, Ventura County Solid Waste Management Department, Ojai Valley Sanitary District, Ventura River County Water District, Ojai Basin Ground Water Management Agency, Meiners Oaks County Water Districts, and Southern California Water Company Prepared by: ENTRIX, Inc. Walnut Creek, CA and Woodward Clyde Consultants Santa Barbara, CA Project No. 351001 December 1997 VENTURA RIVER STEELHEAD RESTORATION AND RECOVERY PLAN Prepared for: Casitas Municipal Water District, City of San Buenaventura, Ventura County Flood Control District, Ventura County Transportation Department, Ventura County Solid Waste Management Department, Ojai Valley Sanitary District, Ventura River County Water District, Ojai Basin Ground Water Management Agency, Meiners Oaks County Water Districts, and Southern California Water Company Prepared by: ENTRIX, Inc. 590 Ygnacio Valley Road, Suite 200 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Woodward Clyde Consultants 130 Robin Hill Road, Suite 100 Santa Barbara, California 93117 Project No. 351001 December 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... ix List of Figures.................................................................................................................... xi Executive Summary........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Matilija Copy Vol
    Matilija Copy Vol. 15:5 Channel Islands Chapter of the California Native Plant Society, serving Ventura and Santa Barbara Counties Matilija Copy Volume 15, Issue 5 Editor: David L. Magney December 2002-February 2003 UPCOMING CHAPTER PROGRAMS President’s Message Hello All, hope you had a great Holiday Season! “Conservation Issues of Southern California” We certainly had a successful By Illeene Anderson, CNPS Southern California Botanist 2002, capped off by our Annual 7:30 p.m., Wednesday, January 15, E.P. Foster Library, Ventura Meeting. Special Thanks to Rita Illeene is an independent botanical consultant based in Los Angeles, and works DePuydt for making all the part-time as a conservation botanist for CNPS. She has focused a lot of her arrangements – so many energy for CNPS on protecting the flora in the Mojave and Colorado Deserts of compliments for the art and southern California. music, as well as the food!! * Dinner at local restaurant before each meeting. Call local facilitator for time and place. * The Chapter is planning for a great set of events for this next “CNPS State of the State Address” year; take a look at the program By Pam Muick, CNPS Executive Director and trips section in the 7:30 p.m., Wednesday, February 19, Santa Barbara Botanic Garden newsletter. Come meet and hear CNPS’s new Executive Director talk about CNPS from the Special thanks also to those who statewide perspective, including how this perspective supports local Chapter participated in the Patagonia programs including horticultural, education, conservation, plant science, Salmon Run event in November vegetation and invasives efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 2 Los Padres National R5-MB-078 Forest Strategy September 2005
    United States Department of Agriculture Land Management Plan Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region Part 2 Los Padres National R5-MB-078 Forest Strategy September 2005 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, Write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Land Management Plan Part 2 Los Padres National Forest Strategy R5-MB-078 September 2005 Table of Contents Tables ....................................................................................................................................................v Document Format Protocols................................................................................................................ vi LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN STRATEGY..................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Inventoried Roadless Areas and Wilderness Evaluations
    Introduction and Evaluation Process Summary Inventoried Roadless Areas and Wilderness Evaluations For reader convenience, all wilderness evaluation documents are compiled here, including duplicate sections that are also found in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Appendix D Inventoried Roadless Areas. Introduction and Evaluation Process Summary Inventoried Roadless Areas Proposed Wilderness by and Wilderness Evaluations Alternative Introduction and Evaluation Process Summary Roadless areas refer to substantially natural landscapes without constructed and maintained roads. Some improvements and past activities are acceptable within roadless areas. Inventoried roadless areas are identified in a set of maps contained in the Forest Service Roadless Area Conservation Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS), Volume 2, November 2000. These areas may contain important environmental values that warrant protection and are, as a general rule, managed to preserve their roadless characteristics. In the past, roadless areas were evaluated as potential additions to the National Wilderness Preservation System. Roadless areas have maintained their ecological and social values, and are important both locally and nationally. Recognition of the values of roadless areas is increasing as our population continues to grow and demand for outdoor recreation and other uses of the Forests rises. These unroaded and undeveloped areas provide the Forests with opportunities for potential wilderness, as well as non-motorized recreation, commodities and amenities. The original Forest Plans evaluated Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE II) data from the mid- 1980s and recommended wilderness designation for some areas. Most areas were left in a roadless, non- motorized use status. This revision of Forest Plans analyzes a new and more complete land inventory of inventoried roadless areas as well as other areas identified by the public during scoping.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan
    Ventura River Watershed Management Plan Final Draft: Parts 1 & 2 To be Considered for Approval by the Ventura River Watershed Council on November 20, 2014 Because the Ventura River Watershed Management Reviewing Information and Instructions: Plan will be such a large document, its approval by the Please note that this version is a low-resolution PDF, so Watershed Council is being handled in stages. At the some of the graphics are not sharp. A higher-resolution upcoming November 20 meeting of the Watershed PDF of the final version will be made available on the Council, the front sections of the plan—those that website and for print. Also, some of the graphics and comprise what is essentially “the plan” part of the plan— design elements in this version are still in flux. are scheduled for approval. This includes: The schedule and budget do not allow for significant • Executive Summary revisions at this point. Many opportunities have been • Part 1 – Introduction provided to review most of this text in draft form. New • Part 2 - Watershed Plan, Projects, and Programs sections that have not been through review include: The final draft of these sections is contained herein. Introduction, 1.1 Executive Summary, and 1.3 The Part 3 - Watershed Characterization, and Planning Process. Part 4 - References and Supporting Material, Please do your best to limit comments to the new will be approved at a future meeting. sections, or to correct important inaccuracies or errors. If you find something you feel should be corrected, contact Lorraine Walter ([email protected] or 649-6852x4) with that information— by November 17 if possible.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of the Effects of Fuel Treatments and Previous Wildfires on Fire Behavior and Suppression for the Day and Zaca Fires on the Los Padres National Forest
    080107 Draft An Assessment of the Effects of Fuel Treatments and Previous Wildfires on Fire Behavior and Suppression for the Day and Zaca Fires on the Los Padres National Forest Day Fire photo taken Sept. 17, 2006, courtesy of NASA, Astronaut photo ISSO13-E-81687, provided by ISS Crew Earth Observations experiment and the Image Science & Analysis Group, Johnson Space Center. Zaca Fire photo courtesy of NASA. Taken on Aug. 5, 2007 by the MODIS Rapid Response Team. Carol Henson Fire Management Specialist U.S. Forest Service Adaptive Management Services Enterprise Team - 1 - 080107 Draft Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 6 Wildland Urban Interface 7 Fire History on the Los Padres National Forest 8 Objectives 9 Methodology 9 2006 Day Fire 9 Description of Fire Environment 10 Fire Danger and Weather 10 Fuels 11 Fuel Treatments 12 Topography 13 Fire Behavior Chronology 13 Fire Effects of Fuel Treatments 15 Fire Behavior 15 Suppression Effectiveness 16 Fire Effects of Non-treatments 16 Fire Behavior 16 2007 Zaca Fire 16 Description of Fire Environment 17 Fire Danger and Weather 17 Fuels 19 Fuel Treatments 19 Topography 22 Fire Behavior Chronology 22 Fire Effects of Fuel Treatments 26 Fire Behavior 26 Suppression Effectiveness 27 Fire Effects of Non-treatments 27 Fire Behavior 27 Summary 28 Acknowledgement 30 Appendices 31 - 2 - 080107 Draft Executive Summary The 2006 Day and 2007 Zaca Fires both occurred on the Los Padres National Forest in California. The 2006 Day Fire burned over 162,000 acres mostly in rugged terrain with moderate to heavy chaparral and timber.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    Executive Summary The Watershed’s Story . xxvii A Collective Management Strategy . xxxi Going Forward . xxxii Goals and Core Findings . xxxii The Plan and the Process . xxxviii www.venturawatershed.org Lake Casitas Intake Structure Under Construction, 1958 Photo courtesy of Casitas Municipal Water District EXECUTIVE SUMMARY XXVII Executive Summary The Watershed’s Story The Ventura River watershed is a rare and remarkable coastal southern California treasure; it is water-self-reliant, providing clean water to many farms and residents both within and outside its boundaries. Stream networks in surrounding watersheds are often channelized and hard to recognize as streams; in the Ventura River watershed river and streams The Ventura River watershed is are largely unchannelized. Urban development dominates much of the a rare and remarkable coastal landscape of southern California; yet cities comprise only three percent of the Ventura River watershed, and developed land only 13%. A unique southern California treasure; it set of circumstances has left this small watershed with a relatively healthy is water-self-reliant, providing ecosystem, containing over 100 special status plant and animal species. clean water to many farms At 226 square miles (144,833 acres), the Ventura River watershed is the and residents both within smallest of Ventura County’s three major watersheds. The watershed and outside its boundaries. extends from its Matilija Creek headwaters in the steep Transverse Ranges of the Matilija Wilderness to the Pacific Ocean, 33.5-miles downstream. The beginning of the Ventura River itself is marked by the confluence of Matilija Creek with North Fork Matilija Creek, 16.2 miles from the Pacific Ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Matilija Copy Vol
    Matilija Copy Vol. 17:1 Channel Islands Chapter of the California Native Plant Society, serving Ventura and Santa Barbara Counties Matilija Copy Volume 17, Issue 1 Editor: David L. Magney April-June 2004 Contents UPCOMING CHAPTER PROGRAMS Note: The Channel Islands Chapter has a new mailing “Fostering a Connection to our Natural Environment, Ethnobotany of address. Please send all mail to the Channel Islands Chapter to: California Native Plants, An Educational Tool” Karen Osland, Ethnobotanist CNPS Channel Islands Chapter 7:30 p.m., Wednesday, April 21, Santa Barbara Botanic Garden PO Box 6 Ms. Osland is currently employed as an Environmental Planner at Vandenberg Air Force Base. Ojai, CA 93024-0006 She has also worked as a Staff Archaeologist at Vandenberg AFB and as an archaeologist for CalTrans, Forest Service, and various independent environmental consultants. She and partner Item Page Kathy Badrak have been teaching classes and workshops on native California plant Programs 1 identification and plant uses for 15 years. They lead interpretative walks though various plant communities. A major theme of these walks is how the California Indians managed and Conservation 2 utilized their local environment. Ms. Osland is a Docent at Santa Barbara Botanic Garden, Horticulture 3 Mission La Purisima, and a volunteer at Guadalupe Dunes Center. She is also an active member of the Central Coast Basket Weavers. The mission of this group is to preserve Calendar of Events 4 traditional knowledge of Chumash Indian basketry plants, and weaving techniques. Education 5 * Dinner at local restaurant before each meeting. Call local facilitator for time and place.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Padres National Forest - Wilderness Areas
    Los Padres National Forest - Wilderness Areas http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/lospadres/recreation/wilderness/ Los Padres National Forest Wilderness Areas Wilderness Passes You do not need a wilderness pass for any of the wildernesses in the Los Padres National Forest. You do need a campfire permit. What is Wilderness? According to the Wilderness Act of 1964, wilderness areas are "where earth and its community of life remain untrammeled, where man himself is a visitor who does not remain." The Los Padres National Forest has ten designated wilderness areas: Ventana, Silver Peak, Santa Lucia, Garcia, Machesna, San Rafael, Dick Smith, Matilija, Sespe, Chumash. For backpacking information and other area specific information, contact the Forest Service office nearest your trailhead. Ten Wilderness Areas in Los Padres National Forest Los Padres National Forest has 10 Congressionally designated Wildernesses comprising 875,000 acres, or approximately 48% of the 1.75 million acre National Forest. Wilderness Areas by Ranger District Ojai Ranger District Sespe Wilderness 219,700 acres* (includes Sespe Condor Sanctuary) was established 1992 by the Los Padres Condor Range and River Protection Act. The Sespe Wilderness is predominately located in the Ojai and the Mt. Pinos Ranger Districts. One popular destination is the hot springs about 16 miles from Lion Camp (this campground is presently closed). The Sespe Wilderness is mainly a chaparral covered environment with rock cliffs in various sites. There is a beautiful area called Piedra Blanca, just off highway 33 along the Piedra Blanca-Gene Marshall Trail. The Sespe Condor Sanctuary is also in the wilderness. This site, closed to the public, was established to promote the propagation and growth of the California Condor.
    [Show full text]