DOCSLIB.ORG

04 PUBLIC Streets and Routes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
04 PUBLIC Streets and Routes Page 41 of 80 INTRODUCTION 04 PUBLIC Streets, lanes, arcades, bridges This section of the Plan and overpasses are defined as includes the following: public streets and routes in this STREEts Plan. Waterfront promenades Public streets and and creek corridor are defined routes overview as public spaces in this Plan. Overview of context and AND routES directions that inform the The recommended principles design principles and and guidelines apply to all recommended design publicly accessible routes in guidelines for public streets Docklands regardless of and routes in Docklands. ownership status. This Plan All background information advocates for the refinement of is summarised and mapped D OCKLANDS HAS A PERMEABLE, materials and furniture palettes in Appendix 2. in the Docklands area to ensure WELL-CONNECTED NETWORK consistency with the central D esign principles city streetscape qualities. and guidelines OF public rouTES. Recommended design Streets make up a significant guidelines to achieve portion of the public realm in comfortable and seamless Docklands. As well as catering streets and routes. Design for various forms of movement, principles and guidelines streets and routes provide in Docklands accord with space for incidental cafes, Melbourne’s existing kiosks, seats and canopies that streetscape design policies. contribute to public life. Streets These established policies and routes are and should be support identifiable and treated as important public consistent design standards places. Streets contribute to the and diverse and active character of place and can be public life. destinations in themselves. D esign check lists An illustrative example of design principles applied to a primary street, a summary of street design reference documents and sample of a detailed illustrative street standard from the companion document, Docklands Design and Construction Standards for Public Infrastructure Works (City of Melbourne, 2012). Note: Images in this document are provided for illustrative purposes only and are subject to change. Base maps require periodic review and revision to accord with current conditions in the built environment and revised proposed development Residential streets and lanes at Yarra’s Edge. plans and masterplans. DOCKLANDS PUBLIC REALM PLAN 04. Public streets & routes 077 DATE. 21.08.2012 JOB SIZE. 297mm(h) x 210mm(w) JOB NO. REV. CLIENT. JOB NAME. 028081r07_COME_Docklands Public Realm Plan 93 MONTAGUE ST. STH MELBOURNE VIC 3205 AUSTRALIA PH. (03) 9686 7766 | W. WWW.OD.COM.AU | E. [email protected] © OPTIMO 2012 Page 42 of 80 S TREETS AND ROUTES OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION Melbourne’s central area (known as the Hoddle Grid) dates back to 1837 and spans an area 2 km in length and 1 km in width. Although grid plans are common to many cities, Melbourne’s grid is highly stylised in its scale and formal geometry, giving the city centre a pervasive individual character. The formal grid of primary (30 m width) and little streets (10 m width) is divided by a network of intimate, pedestrian- scaled lanes and arcades. Several of the 30 m wide east-west city streets (Collins, Bourke, La Trobe and Dudley streets) extend across the Spencer Street railway lines, linking the central city to Docklands. Laid across these is a less regular array of new secondary streets in Docklands. Generally, these cross-streets occur at more frequent intervals and are 16-18 m in width. As a result, Docklands has a permeable, Revitalised Swanston Street, Melbourne. well-connected network of public routes. Since the 1980s, a number of initiatives have led to substantial improvements in the quality of street environment and street life in the central city. Physical improvements have included footpath widening, upgrading paving to local bluestone, a lighting strategy, a ‘signature’ street furniture palette and a cafe furniture standard. Special initiatives to improve street life include the rejuvenation of priority laneways, lunchtime street closures and permanent laneway closures and an active edges policy. The positive effect of these policies is evident in the growing numbers of people enjoying the central city streets as documented in the ‘Places for People’ studies. This Plan recommends that Melbourne’s distinctive and high standard of streetscape Freeway/arterial roads design is applied throughout Docklands. Domain tunnel Primary streets Possible future connection Bourke Street Mall, Melbourne. Fig 4.01 I nner Melbourne arterial road and street network, 2012. DOCKLANDS PUBLIC REALM PLAN 04. Public streets & routes 079 DATE. 21.08.2012 JOB SIZE. 297mm(h) x 210mm(w) JOB NO. REV. CLIENT. JOB NAME. 028081r07_COME_Docklands Public Realm Plan 93 MONTAGUE ST. STH MELBOURNE VIC 3205 AUSTRALIA PH. (03) 9686 7766 | W. WWW.OD.COM.AU | E. [email protected] © OPTIMO 2012 Page 43 of 80 S TREETS AND ROUTES OVERVIEW A ccess Docklands: A Plan for the • Bourke Street pedestrian overpass is a poor gateway to Docklands due to level changes, North Melbourne Docklands Transport Network Train Station inadequate shelter, poor signage, inadequate To Errol Street, North Melbourne Access Docklands: A Plan for the Docklands cycling infrastructure and inactive streetscapes. To Dynon Road Transport Network (Places Victoria, City of Dudley Street - • Wayfinding and signage at Docklands can Link to Queen Victoria Market Melbourne with UrbanTrans, 2012) includes be confusing. & Flagstaff Gardens comprehensive baseline data and a range of Moonee Ponds Creek F uture E-Gate important future strategic directions and actions • Poor crossings (wait times, competing use, Trail Site for Docklands regarding water and land-based environment) at key parts of walking and Latrobe Street movement in Docklands and should be cycling networks in Docklands. - City to referenced. Access Docklands supports the Harbour link • Significant walking distances within the principles outlined in this Plan and Transport Dockland area can be exacerbated by large Strategy Planning for Future Growth (City of staircases, a lack of shelter, passive ground Lonsdale Melbourne, 2012). Street floor uses and lack of interesting street life. Melbourne Port The following is a summary of the main The Access Docklands: A Plan for the Bourke challenges identified inAccess Docklands: Docklands Transport Network (Places Victoria, Street A Plan for the Docklands Transport Network City of Melbourne with UrbanTrans, 2012) has (Places Victoria, City of Melbourne with identified a number of short, medium and Collins UrbanTrans, 2012). long-term recommendations to address these Street challenges and a short-term action plan. • Forecast growth in population will place significant demands on transport Flinders infrastructure networks. This Plan provides design guidance to improve Street the overall quality of public streetscapes to Lorimer Street • Wurundjeri Way is the primary local access benefit pedestrians and cyclists. Northbank road for Docklands, yet it is also a major Promenade east-west arterial route carrying significant volumes of traffic. Seafarers Bridge • Walking, cycling and public transport connections between Docklands and areas to the north, south and west are poor. To South Melbourne • Rail infrastructure, arterial roads and the stadium represent barriers to movement Ingles Street between Docklands and the surrounding areas. To Port Melbourne/Albert Park • The Docklands local road network has limited Key future through connections, as much of the precinct connections is surrounded by water, Melbourne Port land E xisting connection uses, rail infrastructure and arterial roads. Potential new connection • Sustainable transport and walkability Committed connections options may be challenged by unfavorable Level changes conditions such as full tram capacity at peak times, poor climatic conditions, and unprotected streetscapes. Fig 4.02 E xisting and potential local connections, 2012. DOCKLANDS PUBLIC REALM PLAN 04. Public streets & routes 081 DATE. 21.08.2012 JOB SIZE. 297mm(h) x 210mm(w) JOB NO. REV. CLIENT. JOB NAME. 028081r07_COME_Docklands Public Realm Plan 93 MONTAGUE ST. STH MELBOURNE VIC 3205 AUSTRALIA PH. (03) 9686 7766 | W. WWW.OD.COM.AU | E. [email protected] © OPTIMO 2012 Page 44 of 80 DSNRE IG P INciplES AND GUIDELINES 1. DIVERSITY OF usE Provide a range of street types to support Docklands streets have been arranged into different uses and contribute to a functional, four types: vibrant and high quality street network. • arterial roads The pedestrian experience will be enhanced by • primary streets P e providing streets that vary in scale and diversity; a r l • secondary streets R Footscray Road i v from large through to a more intimate human e r R io ervat n Driv o bs e • small streets and pedestrian areas. a scale. Varying scales can assist legibility and d O Way S Waterfront wayfinding by visually reflecting the different ta r Circus Each type of street is understood and Dudley Street roles of different streets. It also adds interest Waterfront Way Saint Mangos Ln. Little Docklands Drive and a variety of experiences. Small streets in described within the context of its role, function, The Arcade scale, character and the type of public space Pearl River Road particular can assist connectivity and Studio LaneWharf St. Star Cres. La Trobe Street permeability of the urban fabric. it contributes to the Docklands public realm. Aquitania Way Caravel LaneSt. Mangos La. Palmyra Way Waterfront promenades are included in the Doepel Way Rakaia Way Public Space section of this Plan (page 23). Docklands Drive Pearl River Road Wurundjeri Way Harbour Esplanade e rs S u tad co ium Con Bourke Street Enterprize Way Merchant St. Village St. Cumberland St. Waterview Walk Geographe St. Collins Street Batmans Hill Dr. Hill Batmans Import La. Rebecca Hubbuck La. Encounter Way Way Navigation Dr. Merchant St. Aurora La. Harbour Esplanade (South) Seafarer La.. Karlsruhe La. Georgiana St. Batmans Hill Dr. Keera Way Flinders Street Mc Crae St. Navigation Dr. Docking La. Foundry Way Portal La. Barring Mews Wurundjeri Way Stokehold Mews South Wharf Dr. Canal Mews Po int P a rk C Lorimer Street r e s . Arterial road (Footscray Road) Primary street (La Trobe Street) Swinging Basin La. Ferryman La.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • West Gate Tunnel Project Assessment Report Assalternativeessmen Designt Tore Lowerpo Wurundjerirt Way Extension Alternative De Sign to Lower Wurundjeri Way Extension
    Assessment Report Alternative design to lower Wurundjeri Way extension West Gate Tunnel Project West Gate Tunnel Project Assessment Report AssAlternativeessmen designt toRe lowerpo Wurundjerirt Way extension Alternative de sign to lower Wurundjeri Way extension NovemNovemberber 2017 2017 Table of Contents Table of Contents Attachment C – Design drawing 27 Attachment D – Traffic performance analysis 29 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose 1 1.2 Background 1 1.3 Overview of benefits 2 1.4 Document structure 2 2 Stakeholder consultation 3 2.1 Overview 3 2.2 Stakeholders and feedback 3 3 Overview of Wurundjeri Way extension EES design 4 3.1 Overview 4 3.2 Functional layout and horizontal alignment 4 4 Issues raised in EES exhibition and IAC hearing 6 4.1 Overview 6 4.2 Visual impact 6 4.3 Physical impact on E-Gate 6 4.4 Integration with E-Gate and surrounding areas 6 4.5 Usable space 6 5 Design description – lowering of Wurundjeri Way extension 7 5.1 Overview 7 5.2 Design alignments 7 5.3 Connection at Dynon Road link 10 5.4 Structural design 10 5.5 V/Line stabling relocation 10 6 Planning and urban design 11 6.1 Urban design vision and principles 11 6.2 Urban design assessment 11 7 Impact assessment 15 7.1 Traffic and transport 15 7.2 Air quality 17 7.3 Noise and vibration (surface) 18 8 Conclusion 19 8.1 Overview 19 8.2 Benefits of alternative design – align with any earlier updates 19 8.3 EES Scoping Requirements 20 8.4 Transport Integration Act 20 Attachment A – Minister for Planning letter 22 Attachment B – Transport for Victoria and VicRoads
    [Show full text]
  • Access Docklands: a Strategy for the Docklands Transport Network
    ACCESS DOCKLANDS A STRATEGY FOR THE DOCKLANDS TRANSPORT NETWORK IN COLLABORATION WITH Produced by Places Victoria and City of Melbourne 710 Collins Street, Docklands, Victoria 3008 Publication date: March 2013 Maps and figures shown are for illustration purposes only and are correct as at publication date. ConTENTS P10 P28 P38 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY THE NEED FOR DOCKLANDS TRAVEL INFRASTRUCTURE TARGETS P12 VISION AND P29 P42 RECOMMENDATIONS SUPPORTING POLICIES MAIN CHALLENGES AND STRATEGIES AND OPPORTUNITIES P13 SHORT TERM P32 P44 ACTION PLAN DOCKLANDS VISION AND OBJECTIVES TRAVEL PATTERNS P14 P45 CONCEPT PLAN P33 STRATEGIC APPROACH RESIDENT TRAVEL P20 PATTERNS P46 INTRODUCTION WALKING AND CYCLING P34 P22 WORKER TRAVEL P48 AIM OF ACCESS PATTERNS PUBLIC TRANSPORT DOCKLANDS P35 P50 P23 VISITOR TRAVEL ROADS DEVELOPMENT OF PATTERNS ACCESS DOCKLANDS P52 P35 PROGRAMS AND POLICIES P26 TRANSPORT USER NEEDS STRATEGIC CONTEXT P56 P36 IMPLEMENTATION P26 FUTURE TRAVEL DEMANDS MELBOURNE’S EMERGING CENTRAL CITY AREA P37 INNER WEST P27 TRAVEL DEMANDS GATewaY TO THE WEST 4 Access Docklands 5 ACCESS DOCKLANDS PRESENTS A VISION OF DOCKLANDS AS AN INTEGRATED, ACCESSIBLE AND VIBRANT waTERFRONT PRECINCT AT THE HEART OF MELBOURNE’S NEW CENTRAL CITY AREA. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXecUTIVE SUMMARY PURPOSE OF ACCESS DOCKLANDS STUDY METHOD KEY FINDINGS OF ACCESS DOCKLANDS Access Docklands has been prepared by Places Victoria Access Docklands has been developed through an extensive Docklands travel patterns Docklands as a demonstration of transit oriented development and the City of Melbourne, in conjunction with UrbanTrans. program of consultation and analysis, including: Melbourne Docklands is performing as a successful transit The transport challenge in Docklands and central Melbourne more Key contributors to the project include Docklands residents, • The deployment of travel needs and behaviour surveys to more oriented development, with very high proportions of walking, generally is to improve livability, accessibility and productivity workers, business owners and a range of government agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • West Gate Tunnel Project
    Western Distributor Authority 09-May-2017 West Gate Tunnel Project Technical report K Land use planning 09-May-2017 Prepared for – Western Distributor Authority – ABN: 69981208782 AECOM West Gate Tunnel Project West Gate Tunnel Project Land Use Planning Assessment Client: Western Distributor Authority ABN: 69981208782 Prepared by AECOM Australia Pty Ltd Level 10, Tower Two, 727 Collins Street, Melbourne VIC 3008, Australia T +61 3 9653 1234 F +61 3 9654 7117 www.aecom.com ABN 20 093 846 925 09-May-2017 Job No.: 60338862 AECOM in Australia and New Zealand is certified to ISO9001, ISO14001 AS/NZS4801 and OHSAS18001. 09-May-2017 Prepared for – Western Distributor Authority – ABN: 69981208782 AECOM West Gate Tunnel Project Quality Information Document 60338862 Date 09-May-2017 Prepared by Brian Gibbs, Kaity Munro, Jimmy Chan Reviewed by Kristina Butler Authorised Rev Revision Date Details Name/Position Signature F 09-May-2017 Final Report Kristina Butler Principal Planner 09-May-2017 Prepared for – Western Distributor Authority – ABN: 69981208782 AECOM West Gate Tunnel Project i Executive Summary This technical report is an attachment to the West Gate Tunnel Project Environmental Effects Statement (EES). It provides an assessment of potential land use impacts associated with the project, and defines the Environmental Performance Requirements (EPRs) necessary to meet the EES objectives. Overview This Land Use Planning Impact Assessment Report has been prepared by AECOM to provide an assessment of the land use planning related impacts associated with the construction and operation of the West Gate Tunnel Project. These include potential impacts of the project’s construction and operation on land use, built form and strategic policy within the study area.
    [Show full text]
  • Designated Area – Docklands
    1036 G 19 12 May 2011 Victoria Government Gazette Liquor Control Reform Act 1998 SECTION 147 – ORDER DECLARING A DESIGNATED AREA I, Mark Brennan, Director of Liquor Licensing, make an Order, pursuant to section 147 of the Liquor Control Reform Act 1998 (the Act), declaring the following area to be a designated area for the purposes of Part 8A of the Act: The area of Docklands bounded by the western boundary of Spencer Street, Melbourne, commencing at the intersection of La Trobe Street, Melbourne, in a south-easterly direction to the intersection of Flinders Street, Melbourne, then the northern boundary of Flinders Street, Melbourne, in a south-westerly direction to the intersection of Wurundjeri Way, Melbourne, then the northern boundary of Wurundjeri Way in a south-westerly direction to the Yarra River, Melbourne/Docklands at the Charles Grimes Bridge, then the northern boundary Yarra River, in a north-westerly direction Melbourne/Docklands to the Bolte Bridge, then the eastern boundary of the Bolte Bridge (Citylink) in a northerly direction to Docklands Drive, Docklands, then the northern boundary of Docklands Drive, Docklands in a north-easterly direction to Wurundjeri Way (Dudley Street), Docklands, then the northern and eastern boundary of Wurundjeri Way, Docklands, in a south-easterly direction to La Trobe Street, Docklands, then the northern boundary of La Trobe Street, Docklands, in a north- easterly direction to the intersection of Spencer Street, as shown hatched in the plan below: ST DUDLEY Designated area WURUNDJERI DR STREET
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Engineering Review Traffic Engineering Review
    Traffic Engineering Review Traffic Engineering Review West Gate Tunnel Project V171019 Prepared for Ashurst Australia on behalf of the City of Melbourne 3 August 2017 Traffic Engineering Review West Gate Tunnel Project Document Information Prepared for Ashurst Australia on behalf of the City of Melbourne Project Name West Gate Tunnel Project File Reference V171019REP001-F01.docx Job Reference V171019 Date 3 August 2017 Contact Information Cardno Victoria Pty Ltd Trading as Cardno ABN 47 106 610 913 Level 4 501 Swanston Street Melbourne Victoria 3000 Australia Telephone: (03) 8415 7777 Facsimile: (03) 8415 7788 International: +61 3 8415 7777 [email protected] www.cardno.com © Cardno. Copyright in the whole and every part of this document belongs to Cardno and may not be used, sold, transferred, copied or reproduced in whole or in part in any manner or form or in or on any media to any person other than by agreement with Cardno. This document is produced by Cardno solely for the benefit and use by the client in accordance with the terms of the engagement. Cardno does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by any third party on the content of this document. 3 August 2017 Cardno ii Traffic Engineering Review West Gate Tunnel Project Table of Contents 1 Qualifications and Expertise 4 2 Introduction 6 3 Dynon Road Connection 7 3.1 Traffic Performance Considerations 7 3.1.2 Accident History 8 3.1.3 Traffic Volumes 8 3.1.4 Operating Conditions 12 3.1.5 Dynon
    [Show full text]
  • Ashe Morgan Docklands to North Melbourne Strategic Connection West Gate Tunnel Project Impact & Opportunity
    Ashe Morgan Docklands to North Melbourne Strategic Connection West Gate Tunnel Project Impact & Opportunity 002 Issue | 2 August 2017 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number 256373 Arup Arup Pty Ltd ABN 18 000 966 165 Arup Level 17 1 Nicholson Street East Melbourne VIC 3002 Australia www.arup.com Document Verification Job title Docklands to North Melbourne Strategic Job number Connection 256373 Document title West Gate Tunnel Project Impact & Opportunity File reference Document ref 002 Revision Date Filename Expert Witness.docx Draft 1 31 Jul Description First draft 2017 Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Amy Child Justin Madden Justin Madden Signature Issue 2 Aug Filename Expert Witness - final.docx 2017 Description Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Amy Child Justin Madden Justin Madden Signature Filename Description Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Signature Filename Description Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Signature Issue Document Verification with Document 002 | Issue | 2 August 2017 | Arup \\GLOBAL.ARUP.COM\AUSTRALASIA\MEL\PROJECTS\256000\256373-00 DOCKLANDS TO NORTH\WORK\INTERNAL\REPORT\EXPERT WITNESS - ISSUE.DOCX Ashe Morgan Docklands to North Melbourne Strategic Connection West Gate Tunnel Project Impact & Opportunity Contents Page 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Summary 1 1.2 The Arup Commission 1 2 Expert Particulars 2
    [Show full text]
  • Wurundjeri Way Extension
    Westgate Tunnel Project Environment Effects Statement Inquiry and Advisory Committee August 2017 Stephen Hunt Principal Issues Reviewed 1. The traffic implications of the proposed connection between the Westgate Tunnel Project and Dynon Road and the importance of the connection in relation to the overall objectives of the Project. 2. The traffic implications of the proposed Wurundjeri Way extension. 3. Opportunities to rationalise the proposed cross- section of Footscray Road at ground level. 4. The traffic implications for the Kensington area of the Mackenzie Road ramps. 1. DYNON ROAD CONNECTION Proposed Divergence at CityLink North Connection Proposed Dynon Road Connection Modelled Daily Traffic Volumes Modelled Traffic Distribution to/from City Connections Connection Modelled Daily Volume Percentage Distribution Dynon Road 20,000 36% CityLink (North) 16,500 30% Footscray Road 11,000 20% Appleton Dock Road 5,000 9% Wurundjeri Way 2,500 5% Total 55,000 vpd Project v No Project Volume Difference – North and West Melbourne Local Area Modelled Volumes Dynon Road Link and Wurundjeri Way Extension Road 2031 No Project 2031 Project Project v No Project Dynon Road Link - 20,000 vpd +20,000 vpd Dynon Rd west of 35,500 vpd 38,000 vpd +2,500 vpd CityLink Dynon Rd west of 44,500 vpd 54,000 vpd +9,500 vpd Dryburgh Wurundjeri South - 14,500 vpd +14,500 vpd of Dynon Wurundjeri South - 17,000 vpd +17,000 vpd of Dynon Link Wurundjeri South 47,500 vpd 55,500 vpd +8,000 vpd of Dudley Conclusions from Assessment of Modelling Undertaken ̶ Increases in traffic
    [Show full text]
  • 04 PUBLIC Streets and Routes
    INTRODUCTION 04 PubliC Streets, lanes, arcades, bridges This section of the Plan and overpasses are defined as includes the following: public streets and routes in this strEEts Plan. Waterfront promenades Public streets and and creek corridor are defined routes overview as public spaces in this Plan. Overview of context and and rouTES directions that inform the The recommended principles design principles and and guidelines apply to all recommended design publicly accessible routes in guidelines for public streets Docklands regardless of and routes in Docklands. ownership status. This Plan All background information advocates for the refinement of is summarised and mapped Docklands Has A PErmEablE, materials and furniture palettes in Appendix 2. in the Docklands area to ensure WEll-connECTED NETWork consistency with the central Desi gn principles city streetscape qualities. and guidelines OF public roUTES. Recommended design Streets make up a significant guidelines to achieve portion of the public realm in comfortable and seamless Docklands. As well as catering streets and routes. Design for various forms of movement, principles and guidelines streets and routes provide in Docklands accord with space for incidental cafes, Melbourne’s existing kiosks, seats and canopies that streetscape design policies. contribute to public life. Streets These established policies and routes are and should be support identifiable and treated as important public consistent design standards places. Streets contribute to the and diverse and active character of place and can be public life. destinations in themselves. Des ign check lists An illustrative example of design principles applied to a primary street, a summary of street design reference documents and sample of a detailed illustrative street standard from the companion document, Docklands Design and Construction Standards for Public Infrastructure Works (City of Melbourne, 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit RC0164 Victorian Government Gazette No G 43, 29 October 2015
    COM.0013.0001.0031 2272 G 43 29 October 2015 Victoria Government Gazette TABLE OF PROVISIONS Private Advertisements Randall Bell 2278 Estates of Deceased Persons Rennick & Gaynor 2278 Aitken Partners Pty Ltd 2274 Roberts Beckwith Partners 2278 Anthony McMullan & Co. 2274 Slater & Gordon 2278 Arthur J. Dines & Co. 2274 Tolhurst Druce & Emmerson 2278 Ascot Solicitors 2274 Tragear & Harris Lawyers 2279 Basile Pino & Co. 2274 Warren Peter Canning 2279 Behan Legal 2275 White Cleland Pty Ltd 2279 De Marco Lawyers 2275 Willis Simmonds Lawyers 2279 Donald & Ryan Lawyers 2275 Sales by the Sheriff Dwyer Mahon & Robertson 2275 Julie Hoskin 2279 E. P. Johnson & Davies 2276 Minh Hoang Nguyen 2280 Estate Lawyers Melbourne 2276 Laura Kellett 2280 Fischer McCrae 2276 Garden & Green Lawyers 2276 Government and Outer Budget Sector Agencies Notices 2281 Julie Newdick 2276 Lawson Hughes Peter Walsh 2277 Orders in Council 2331 MST Lawyers 2277 Acts: Crown Lands (Reserves) Mills Oakley Lawyers 2277 Education and Training Reform Nicholas O’Donohue & Co. 2277 Land Pearce Webster Dugdales 2277 Livestock Disease Control Perpetual Legal Services Pty Ltd 2277 Obtainables 2338 Advertisers Please Note As from 29 October 2015 The last Special Gazette was No. 318 dated 28 October 2015. The last Periodical Gazette was No. 1 dated 27 May 2015. How To Submit Copy • See our webpage www.gazette.vic.gov.au • or contact our office on 8523 4601 between 8.30 am and 5.30 pm Monday to Friday COM.0013.0001.0032 Victoria Government Gazette G 43 29 October 2015 2273 PUBLICATION OF THE VICTORIA GOVERNMENT GAZETTE (General) MELBOURNE CUP HOLIDAY WEEK 2015 Please Note New Deadlines for General Gazette G44/15: The Victoria Government Gazette (General) for Melbourne Cup week (G44/15) will be published on Thursday 5 November 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Stadiu Precin
    > West Melbourne A d 3003 d Footsc e ray r R le oad y Railway Plac S l i t r Co a e ode Roa Eliz d Tr e eet t k a ee r Flagstaff Gardens b C Dudley Str et Festival Queen h ds Hall Spencer Stre n e St o P r e ee ne St t o A Wi o dd Coode Roa re M l erley li Anderson et Road a Wu et m N S Dock Road S rundje tr Ki Flagstaff eet tr eet n Station e d g St et Waterfront City NewQuay ri obe Str W E Digital Harbour Wa r LaT re rive y D et Aq NewQuay ui ta S n ia ai W n a Docklandst Ma y Melbourne S R City Mail a k n Centre a go ne i Doep a La s vel La n e Cara e eet l W W a a y y robe Str link eet k y LaT t Central e e Ci r City Studios Stadium 5 & 6 Lonsdale Str Harb C Pear Precinct s l Ri a d v FIND US e our Esp r Marin n y Harbour Esplanade rive R o D o Channel ad ont City Art P NewQua 7 e terfr e Docklands NewQuay Wa Shed Entry n 14 lanad /Exit o a Telstra arin AFL Hous o M Dome t M City ee e Str front Shed head office ter C a 9 ity W ge Bourke C id e Br i n r ria c est le Ped T 4 e St r k a our m B e Melbourne Docklands 3008 ridg 1, 2, 3 Wu Southern Cross B Station Aur C r Victoria Dock Victoria un Victoria Harbour ap Vill olte Point t ai ora La djer R B n eetBatmans Hill Flinders s NAB age S ai t s h l a ed w ee r in En r a Street N y i W t Go e o ra Ma r Bourke Str .
    [Show full text]
  • City of Melbourne West Gate Tunnel Project Submission
    CITY OF MELBOURNE SUBMISSION CITY OF MELBOURNE SUBMISSION WEST GATE TUNNEL PROJECT 1 CITY OF MELBOURNE SUBMISSION TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Figures .................................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 2. Submission purpose and scope ................................................................................................................... 5 3. The City of Melbourne response .................................................................................................................. 5 3.1. The Project............................................................................................................................................ 5 3.2. Environment Effects Statement .......................................................................................................... 10 3.3. Draft Planning Scheme Amendment .................................................................................................. 11 3.4. Project planning and delivery.............................................................................................................. 11 4. Submissions in relation to particular aspects of the Project ...................................................................... 11 4.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Future Melbourne (Planning) Committee Agenda Item 6.7
    Page 1 of 31 Report to the Future Melbourne (Planning) Committee Agenda item 6.7 Hospital Heliport Flight Path Protection Amendment – City of Melbourne 10 November 2015 Submission Presenter: Leanne Hodyl, Acting Manager Urban Strategy Purpose and background 1. The purpose of this report is to seek the Future Melbourne Committee’s endorsement of the attached submission regarding changes to the Melbourne Planning Scheme which have been proposed by Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). 2. DHHS is seeking to make changes to a number of planning schemes, including the Melbourne Planning Scheme, to apply Design and Development Overlays (DDO) to protect emergency medical services helicopter flight paths to and from hospital heliports. This involves limiting the heights of buildings on land affected by the flight paths to and from the Royal Melbourne, the Royal Children’s and the Alfred Hospitals. 3. The Amendment is being processed by the Minister for Planning because the protection of flight paths to hospitals is of State significance. Key issues 4. The proposed DDOs will trigger a planning permit for buildings, works or plumes that have the potential to impact on the flight paths by penetrating the height equivalent of the helipad’s elevation or up to 10 metre above the elevation of the helipad (refer Attachment 2 for the proposed Amendment). 5. Where a permit is triggered under the proposed DDOs, the planning application will be referred to DHHS. DHHS may require that the height of the proposed structure be modified and/or made more visible to helicopter pilots or could refuse an application on the grounds that the proposed structure would impede a safe and efficient flight path.
    [Show full text]