Ramsey 1987 Chapter 6.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ramsey 1987 Chapter 6.Pdf 6 TODA Y'S DIALECTS The modern dialects are usually classified into seven major groups: In the list of those groups below, the population estimates are based upon a total Han Chinese population of 950 million. Dialect Group Estimated Population Where Spoken NoRTH 1. Mandarin 679,250,000 (71.5%) all of North and Southwest SouTH 2. Wu 80,750,000 (8.5%) coastal area around Shanghai, Zhejiang 3. Gan 22,800,000 .(2.4%) Jiangxi' 4. Xiang 45,600,000 (4.8%) Huoan 5. Hakka 35,150,000 (3.7%) widely scattered from Sichuan to Taiwan 6. Yue 47,500,000 (5.0%) Guangdong, Guangxi (and overseas communities) ?.Min 38,950,000 (4.1%) FJ.Ijian, coa&_tal areas of §outh NoRTH Mandarin The Northern varieties of Chinese are usually known a~ the Mandarin dialects. They are typi&ea by the Peking dialect, which is the basis ,o,f the standard language and of "Mandarin" in a much narrower­ and older-sense. These dialects are spoken by more than two-thir.ds of the Chinese people. With the total Chinese population having now passed the billion mark, this proportion means that there are around 700 million Mandarin speakers in the world-considerably more than the number of people who speak English as their first language. The .area where these Mandarin dialects are spoken covers more than three­ fourths of China. (See Fig 5.) It extends over all of :North China and Sichuan, as well as the more recently Sinicized territqries of the North­ west and Southwest. 88 THE CHINESE LANGUAGE This enormous dialect area is customarily divided by Chinese linguists into four subgroups: (1) Northern Mandarin, spoken in the Northeast and including-the- Peking dialect; (2) Northwestern Mandarin, which in­ cludes the dialects of the Loess Plateau and the territories to the west of it; (3) Southwestern Mandarin, spoken in Sichuan and adjacent regions; (4) Eastern, or Lower Yangtze Mandarin, represented by1 the dialects spoken around Nanking. The actual linguistic differences between these groups are relatively slight and are difficult to delineate in any systematic way. Alp10st all of the Mandarin dialects ~re mutually intelligible. They are characterized by a number of common features, which, when taken together, distinguish them fairly clearly from .the other dialect groups. Here are a few of those features: Mandarin dialects do not have a series of voiced stops, with sounds such as English b, d, or g. (The Peking c9nsonants ,that are written with these letters in Pinyin Romanization are phonetically unvoiced.) This feature separates Man­ darin from Shanghainese and the other Wu dfalects (as well as from some of the, Xiang dialects of Hunan). The tone system of the Peking dialect is typical of most Northern speech. The great majority of Mandarin dialects have just four tones (although a few places in the extreme north have just three tones, and a few other dialects near the Yangtze have five or six). There is a great deal of variation in qow these tones are actually pronounc~d-for example, the third and fourth tones have pitch patterns in the Sichuan dialect that are almost exactly the reverse of those in the stan~ard lan­ guage. But the four tone categories are almost always the same. Unlike Cantonese and other Southern dialects, Mandarin does not have -p, -t, -k, or -m as final consonants. The pronoun system is one of the most distinctive features of Mandarin. The third person pronoun tii is found in virtually all Mandarin dialects; completely different forms are used for this pronoun in Southern dialects. ,Plurals are indi­ cated in Mandarin by the suffix -men (e.g., wo '1,' women 'we'; tii 'he, she,' tiimen 'they'). Many Mandarin dialects have the inclusive pronoun zdmen 'we (you and 1),' which is different from women 'we (he or they and 1).' The subordinative particle in Mandarin is -de'or -di (e.g., wade shu 'my book'). This pa~ticle is as a' rule not found in the dialect groups spoken south of the Yangtze Rivet. SOUTH Wu The Wu dialects are spoken in the Yangtze delta and the coastal region around Shanghai. This is an area' in the most fertile and densely TODA Y'S DIALECTS 89 populated part of China. There are more than eighty million speakers of Wu, and they live in a space approximately the size of the state of Georgia (which has a population of about five and a half million). The heart of this Wu-speaking area is Shanghai, China's largest city. Located on the flatlands of the rich Shanghai delta, this great metropolis of eleven million people serves as the economic and cultural focal point for the entire Yangtze basin. It is, above all, a city of industry and com­ merce. Its 8,000 factories produce everything from shoe polish and sweets to automobiles and steel, and altogether account for one-eighth of China's total industrial output. Its port, which is connected to the Yang­ tze estuary by the muddy Whangpoo River, accommodates a volume of cargo that ranks it among the twelve busiest in the world. The cultural. impact of Shanghai on the rest of China is considerable. Of all the PRC's urban areas, it is by far the most cosmopolitan. Of course, Communist reform long ago destroyed the wicked opulence of what was once called "the Paris of Asia" -there are no more opium dens or prostitutes, posh foreign restaurants, hotels, or bars. Shanghai's old racetrack, for exam­ ple, has become People's Park. Yet, in spite of more than thirty years of reeducation and reorientation, an atmosphere of smart sophistication still remains in Shanghai. Clothing is more colorful and, by Western stan­ dards, more stylish than elsewhere in the country. After the fall of the Gang of Four, Shanghai's women took up permanent waves and makeup again more quickly than did their counterparts in other cities. Nanking Road, which runs through the heart of what was formerly the British settlement, still has its reputation for better shopping, and bureaucrats from elsewhere seldom leave Shanghai without a visit to its stores. The appearance of downtown Shanghai, too, has changed little since 1949, and much of it still looks like the Paris of Asia. The foreign communities may have been disenfranchised, but the streets and buildings where they once lived are still there, occupied by others and used for different pur­ poses. The look of this European architecture stands in sharp contrast to that of the monumental mixture of imperial and Stalinist style to be seen in Peking. Nothing else in China is quite like Shanghai. By Chinese standards Shanghai is a new city. It began to be built up by foreign capital in the latter half of the nineteenth century; before that, it was an insignificant Southern town. Ancient records tell us that around 200 B.C. it was the site of a tiny fishing village, which was part of the kingdom of Wu. (The Wu dialects are named after this ancient "barbar­ ian" state.) Soochow was the most important city in the area then; it was the capital of Wu. After Wu territory became Chinese, Soochow kept 90 THE CHINESE LANGUAGE its position of prominence in the Yangtze delta, continuing as a cultural and literary center through all the succeeding Chinese dynasties. Shang­ hai, meanwhile, became .the port for Soochow in about A.D. 500, and its fortunes remained tied t6 that other city until the mid-nineteenth century. :Yhen, with the granting of the foreign concessions, its orientation changed, and ·it quickly came to eclipse Soochow in po'pulation and money. The needs of the foreign community, which was bent on the exploitation of all of China, rpade it a boom ·town, as skilled and semi­ skilled labor poured in from the surrounding areas to take advantage of economic opportunity. Many of these migrants were also refugees, for the enclaves of Shanghai offered those willing to cut their roots with tradition ·a sanctuary against the very real physical dangers of living in.a Chinese countryside that was rapidly becoming chaotic. By the end of the nineteenth century the population of Shanghai had swelled to over four million. Now it is three times that large. The language of Shanghai reflects this turbulence. It comes in many varieties, depending on neighborhood and social group, and there is evi­ dence of rapid generational change. Earlier missionary descriptions indi­ cate that around the turn of the century it still had a sound system and vocabulary much like that of Sooc,how. But increased immigration of artisans and clerks from slightly farther down the·coast began to give the metropolitan area a more Southern'flavor, and today colloquial Shanghai ~peech ,.i_s different from that of Soochow, with an apparent mixture of elements from various places in the Wu dialect area. In discussing the linguistic state of affairs, one Western writer notes this mixing and refers to "the so-called Shanghai dialect," saying that it is "not a pure dialect at all, but·a metropolitan.hodge-podge." Nevertheless, in the Wu dialect area today, Shanghai is clearly the place to be from, and anyone from anywhere near the metropolitan area will identify himself as "·Shangliainese." The upper-class dialect of Soochow, which was'once the object of esteem and envy even in Shang­ hai itself, is now thought of as slightly old-fashioned or quaint. The majority speech of downtown Shanghai has become by far the most< import;;mt of the Wu dialects. The feature for which Sh;;tnghainese and the rest of the Wu dialects are Q.est known is a three-way distinction in the initial consonants; for exam­ ple, between p,anq p' and.b.
Recommended publications
  • Pan-Sinitic Object Marking: Morphology and Syntax*
    Breaking Down the Barriers, 785-816 2013-1-050-037-000234-1 Pan-Sinitic Object Marking: * Morphology and Syntax Hilary Chappell (曹茜蕾) EHESS In Chinese languages, when a direct object occurs in a non-canonical position preceding the main verb, this SOV structure can be morphologically marked by a preposition whose source comes largely from verbs or deverbal prepositions. For example, markers such as kā 共 in Southern Min are ultimately derived from the verb ‘to accompany’, pau11 幫 in many Huizhou and Wu dialects is derived from the verb ‘to help’ and bǎ 把 from the verb ‘to hold’ in standard Mandarin and the Jin dialects. In general, these markers are used to highlight an explicit change of state affecting a referential object, located in this preverbal position. This analysis sets out to address the issue of diversity in such object-marking constructions in order to examine the question of whether areal patterns exist within Sinitic languages on the basis of the main lexical fields of the object markers, if not the construction types. The possibility of establishing four major linguistic zones in China is thus explored with respect to grammaticalization pathways. Key words: typology, grammaticalization, object marking, disposal constructions, linguistic zones 1. Background to the issue In the case of transitive verbs, it is uncontroversial to state that a common word order in Sinitic languages is for direct objects to follow the main verb without any overt morphological marking: * This is a “cross-straits” paper as earlier versions were presented in turn at both the Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica, during the joint 14th Annual Conference of the International Association of Chinese Linguistics and 10th International Symposium on Chinese Languages and Linguistics, held in Taipei in May 25-29, 2006 and also at an invited seminar at the Institute of Linguistics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences in Beijing on 23rd October 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Singapore Mandarin Chinese : Its Variations and Studies
    This document is downloaded from DR‑NTU (https://dr.ntu.edu.sg) Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Singapore Mandarin Chinese : its variations and studies Lin, Jingxia; Khoo, Yong Kang 2018 Lin, J., & Khoo, Y. K. (2018). Singapore Mandarin Chinese : its variations and studies. Chinese Language and Discourse, 9(2), 109‑135. doi:10.1075/cld.18007.lin https://hdl.handle.net/10356/136920 https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.18007.lin © 2018 John Benjamins Publishing Company. All rights reserved. This paper was published in Chinese Language and Discourse and is made available with permission of John Benjamins Publishing Company. Downloaded on 26 Sep 2021 00:28:12 SGT To appear in Chinese Language and Discourse (2018) Singapore Mandarin Chinese: Its Variations and Studies* Jingxia Lin and Yong Kang Khoo Nanyang Technological University Abstract Given the historical and linguistic contexts of Singapore, it is both theoretically and practically significant to study Singapore Mandarin (SM), an important member of Global Chinese. This paper aims to present a relatively comprehensive linguistic picture of SM by overviewing current studies, particularly on the variations that distinguish SM from other Mandarin varieties, and to serve as a reference for future studies on SM. This paper notes that (a) current studies have often provided general descriptions of the variations, but less on individual variations that may lead to more theoretical discussions; (b) the studies on SM are primarily based on the comparison with Mainland China Mandarin; (c) language contact has been taken as the major contributor of the variation in SM, whereas other factors are often neglected; and (d) corpora with SM data are comparatively less developed and the evaluation of data has remained largely in descriptive statistics.
    [Show full text]
  • Language Contact in Nanning: Nanning Pinghua and Nanning Cantonese
    20140303 draft of : de Sousa, Hilário. 2015a. Language contact in Nanning: Nanning Pinghua and Nanning Cantonese. In Chappell, Hilary (ed.), Diversity in Sinitic languages, 157–189. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Do not quote or cite this draft. LANGUAGE CONTACT IN NANNING — FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF NANNING PINGHUA AND NANNING CANTONESE1 Hilário de Sousa Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, École des hautes études en sciences sociales — ERC SINOTYPE project 1 Various topics discussed in this paper formed the body of talks given at the following conferences: Syntax of the World’s Languages IV, Dynamique du Langage, CNRS & Université Lumière Lyon 2, 2010; Humanities of the Lesser-Known — New Directions in the Descriptions, Documentation, and Typology of Endangered Languages and Musics, Lunds Universitet, 2010; 第五屆漢語方言語法國際研討會 [The Fifth International Conference on the Grammar of Chinese Dialects], 上海大学 Shanghai University, 2010; Southeast Asian Linguistics Society Conference 21, Kasetsart University, 2011; and Workshop on Ecology, Population Movements, and Language Diversity, Université Lumière Lyon 2, 2011. I would like to thank the conference organizers, and all who attended my talks and provided me with valuable comments. I would also like to thank all of my Nanning Pinghua informants, my main informant 梁世華 lɛŋ11 ɬi55wa11/ Liáng Shìhuá in particular, for teaching me their language(s). I have learnt a great deal from all the linguists that I met in Guangxi, 林亦 Lín Yì and 覃鳳餘 Qín Fèngyú of Guangxi University in particular. My colleagues have given me much comments and support; I would like to thank all of them, our director, Prof. Hilary Chappell, in particular. Errors are my own.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstructing the Evolutionary History of Chinese Dialects
    Reconstructing the Evolutionary History of Chinese Dialects Esra Erdem Institute of Information Systems, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria [email protected] Feng Wang Department of Chinese Language and Literature, Peking University, Beijing, China [email protected] Evolutionary relations between languages based on their shared characteristics can be represented as a phylogeny --- a tree where the leaves represent the extant languages, the internal vertices represent the ancestral languages, and the edges represent the genetic relations between the languages. On the other hand, languages not only inherit characteristics from their ancestors but also sometimes borrow them from other languages. Such borrowings can be represented by additional non-tree edges, turning a phylogeny into a phylogenetic network. With this motivation, we reconstruct the evolutionary history of languages in two steps: first we compute a plausible phylogeny with a minimal number of incompatible characters, and then we turn this phylogeny into a perfect phylogenetic network, by adding a small number of lateral edges, so that all characters are compatible with the network. For both steps, to formulate the problems and to solve them, we use answer set programming --- a new form of declarative programming. This method has been successfully applied to reconstruct the evolutionary history of Indo-European languages. In the following we summarize its application to reconstruct the evolutionary history of Old Chinese and the following 23 Chinese dialects: Guangzhou, Liancheng, Meixian, Taiwan, Xiamen, Zhangping, Fuzhou, Nanchang, Anyi, Shuangfeng, Changsha, Beijing, Yuci, Taiyuan, Ningxia, Chengdu, Yingshan, Wuhan, Ningbo, Suzhou, Shangai 1, Shangai 2, Wenzhou. We have started with a dataset consisting of 200 lexical characters (the Swadesh wordlist), each with 1--24 states.
    [Show full text]
  • Shanghainese Vowel Merger Reversal Full Title
    0 Short title: Shanghainese vowel merger reversal Full title: On the cognitive basis of contact-induced sound change: Vowel merger reversal in Shanghainese Names, affiliations, and email addresses of authors: Yao Yao The Hong Kong Polytechnic University [email protected] Charles B. Chang Boston University [email protected] Address for correspondence: Yao Yao The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Department of Chinese and Bilingual Studies Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong 1 Short title: Shanghainese vowel merger reversal Full title: On the cognitive basis of contact-induced sound change: Vowel merger reversal in Shanghainese 2 Abstract This study investigated the source and status of a recent sound change in Shanghainese (Wu, Sinitic) that has been attributed to language contact with Mandarin. The change involves two vowels, /e/ and /ɛ/, reported to be merged three decades ago but produced distinctly in contemporary Shanghainese. Results of two production experiments showed that speaker age, language mode (monolingual Shanghainese vs. bilingual Shanghainese-Mandarin), and crosslinguistic phonological similarity all influenced the production of these vowels. These findings provide evidence for language contact as a linguistic means of merger reversal and are consistent with the view that contact phenomena originate from cross-language interaction within the bilingual mind.* Keywords: merger reversal, language contact, bilingual processing, phonological similarity, crosslinguistic influence, Shanghainese, Mandarin. * This research was supported by
    [Show full text]
  • De Sousa Sinitic MSEA
    THE FAR SOUTHERN SINITIC LANGUAGES AS PART OF MAINLAND SOUTHEAST ASIA (DRAFT: for MPI MSEA workshop. 21st November 2012 version.) Hilário de Sousa ERC project SINOTYPE — École des hautes études en sciences sociales [email protected]; [email protected] Within the Mainland Southeast Asian (MSEA) linguistic area (e.g. Matisoff 2003; Bisang 2006; Enfield 2005, 2011), some languages are said to be in the core of the language area, while others are said to be periphery. In the core are Mon-Khmer languages like Vietnamese and Khmer, and Kra-Dai languages like Lao and Thai. The core languages generally have: – Lexical tonal and/or phonational contrasts (except that most Khmer dialects lost their phonational contrasts; languages which are primarily tonal often have five or more tonemes); – Analytic morphological profile with many sesquisyllabic or monosyllabic words; – Strong left-headedness, including prepositions and SVO word order. The Sino-Tibetan languages, like Burmese and Mandarin, are said to be periphery to the MSEA linguistic area. The periphery languages have fewer traits that are typical to MSEA. For instance, Burmese is SOV and right-headed in general, but it has some left-headed traits like post-nominal adjectives (‘stative verbs’) and numerals. Mandarin is SVO and has prepositions, but it is otherwise strongly right-headed. These two languages also have fewer lexical tones. This paper aims at discussing some of the phonological and word order typological traits amongst the Sinitic languages, and comparing them with the MSEA typological canon. While none of the Sinitic languages could be considered to be in the core of the MSEA language area, the Far Southern Sinitic languages, namely Yuè, Pínghuà, the Sinitic dialects of Hǎinán and Léizhōu, and perhaps also Hakka in Guǎngdōng (largely corresponding to Chappell (2012, in press)’s ‘Southern Zone’) are less ‘fringe’ than the other Sinitic languages from the point of view of the MSEA linguistic area.
    [Show full text]
  • Glottal Stop Initials and Nasalization in Sino-Vietnamese and Southern Chinese
    Glottal Stop Initials and Nasalization in Sino-Vietnamese and Southern Chinese Grainger Lanneau A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts University of Washington 2020 Committee: Zev Handel William Boltz Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Asian Languages and Literature ©Copyright 2020 Grainger Lanneau University of Washington Abstract Glottal Stop Initials and Nasalization in Sino-Vietnamese and Southern Chinese Grainger Lanneau Chair of Supervisory Committee: Professor Zev Handel Asian Languages and Literature Middle Chinese glottal stop Ying [ʔ-] initials usually develop into zero initials with rare occasions of nasalization in modern day Sinitic1 languages and Sino-Vietnamese. Scholars such as Edwin Pullyblank (1984) and Jiang Jialu (2011) have briefly mentioned this development but have not yet thoroughly investigated it. There are approximately 26 Sino-Vietnamese words2 with Ying- initials that nasalize. Scholars such as John Phan (2013: 2016) and Hilario deSousa (2016) argue that Sino-Vietnamese in part comes from a spoken interaction between Việt-Mường and Chinese speakers in Annam speaking a variety of Chinese called Annamese Middle Chinese AMC, part of a larger dialect continuum called Southwestern Middle Chinese SMC. Phan and deSousa also claim that SMC developed into dialects spoken 1 I will use the terms “Sinitic” and “Chinese” interchangeably to refer to languages and speakers of the Sinitic branch of the Sino-Tibetan language family. 2 For the sake of simplicity, I shall refer to free and bound morphemes alike as “words.” 1 in Southwestern China today (Phan, Desousa: 2016). Using data of dialects mentioned by Phan and deSousa in their hypothesis, this study investigates initial nasalization in Ying-initial words in Southwestern Chinese Languages and in the 26 Sino-Vietnamese words.
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Chinese Phonology Guillaume Jacques Chinese Historical Phonology Differs from Most Domains of Contemporary Linguisti
    Traditional Chinese Phonology Guillaume Jacques Chinese historical phonology differs from most domains of contemporary linguistics in that its general framework is based in large part on a genuinely native tradition. The non-Western outlook of the terminology and concepts used in Chinese historical phonology make this field extremely difficult to understand for both experts in other fields of Chinese linguistics and historical phonologists specializing in other language families. The framework of Chinese phonology derives from the tradition of rhyme books and rhyme tables, which dates back to the medieval period (see section 1 and 2, as well as the corresponding entries). It is generally accepted that these sources were not originally intended as linguistic descriptions of the spoken language; their main purpose was to provide standard character readings for literary Chinese (see subsection 2.4). Nevertheless, these documents also provide a full-fledged terminology describing both syllable structure (initial consonant, rhyme, tone) and several phonological features (places of articulation of consonants and various features that are not always trivial to interpret, see section 2) of the Chinese language of their time (on the problematic concept of “Middle Chinese”, see the corresponding entry). The terminology used in this field is by no means a historical curiosity only relevant to the history of linguistics. It is still widely used in contemporary Chinese phonology, both in works concerning the reconstruction of medieval Chinese and in the description of dialects (see for instance Ma and Zhang 2004). In this framework, the phonological information contained in the medieval documents is used to reconstruct the pronunciation of earlier stages of Chinese, and the abstract categories of the rhyme tables (such as the vexing děng 等 ‘division’ category) receive various phonetic interpretations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Glottal Stop in Diminutives: an OT Perspective*
    LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS 8.3:639-666, 2007 2007-0-008-003-000168-1 The Role of the Glottal Stop in Diminutives: * An OT Perspective Raung-fu Chung Ming-chung Cheng Southern Taiwan University of Technology National Kaohsiung Normal University In this article, we first sort out the glottal stop patterns in the YBTH diminutives, namely, middle-GSI, final-GSI, and no-GSI (GSI = glottal stop insertion). After further analysis, those varieties in appearance come out essentially with different rankings of the same set of phonological constraints. In the middle-GSI type of dialects, the related phonological constraints work in the ranking order of MAX-IO, ANCHOR-BD(L/R), SON-SEQ, MAX-BD, LINEARITY-BD >> IDENTITY-BD[F], CONTIGUITY-BD, DEP-BD, while in the final-GSI dialects, the order is MAX-IO, ANCHOR-BD(L), CONTIGUITY-BD, SON-SEQ, MAX-BD, IDENTITY-BD[F], LINEARITY-BD >> ANCHOR-BD(R), DEP-BD. The no-GSI type of dialects are unique in that the order of the constraint is ANCHOR-BD(L/R), CONTIGUITY-BD, SON-SEQ, MAX-BD, DEP-BD, IDENTITY-BD[F], LINEARITY-BD >> MAX-IO, which places the MAX-IO in the lowest ranking. It is obvious that MAX-IO, as a constraint of the Faithfulness family, plays a central role for the presence or absence of the glottal stop. When MAX-IO is ranked high, the glottal stop shows up. When it is low, there is no glottal stop. Key words: glottal stop, diminutive, Yuebei Tuhua, optimality theory, output-to-output correspondence (OOC) 1. Introduction This article is an investigation into the role of the glottal stop in the development and formation of diminutives in Chinese dialects in general, and in Yuebei Tuhua (hereafter, YBTH) in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • The Survey on the Distribution of MC Fei and Xiao Initial Groups in Chinese Dialects
    IALP 2020, Kuala Lumpur, Dec 4-6, 2020 The Survey on the Distribution of MC Fei and Xiao Initial Groups in Chinese Dialects Yan Li Xiaochuan Song School of Foreign Languages, School of Foreign Languages, Shaanxi Normal University, Shaanxi Normal University Xi’an, China /Henan Agricultural University e-mail: [email protected] Xi’an/Zhengzhou, China e-mail:[email protected] Abstract — MC Fei 非 and Xiao 晓 initial group discussed in this paper includes Fei 非, Fu groups are always mixed together in the southern 敷 and Feng 奉 initials, but does not include Wei part of China. It can be divided into four sections 微, while MC Xiao 晓 initial group includes according to the distribution: the northern area, the Xiao 晓 and Xia 匣 initials. The third and fourth southwestern area, the southern area, the class of Xiao 晓 initial group have almost southeastern area. The mixing is very simple in the palatalized as [ɕ] which doesn’t mix with Fei northern area, while in Sichuan it is the most initial group. This paper mainly discusses the first extensive and complex. The southern area only and the second class of Xiao and Xia initials. The includes Hunan and Guangxi where ethnic mixing of Fei and Xiao initials is a relatively minorities gather, and the mixing is very recent phonetic change, which has no direct complicated. Ancient languages are preserved in the inheritance with the phonological system of southeastern area where there are still bilabial Qieyun. The mixing mainly occurs in the southern sounds and initial consonant [h], but the mixing is part of the mainland of China.
    [Show full text]
  • Xiang Dialects Xiāng Fāngyán ​湘方言
    ◀ Xiang Comprehensive index starts in volume 5, page 2667. Xiang Dialects Xiāng fāngyán ​湘方言 Mandarin 普通话 (putonghua, literally “com- kingdom, which was established in the third century ce, moner’s language”) is the standard Chinese but it was greatly influenced by northern Chinese (Man- language. Apart from Mandarin, there are darin) at various times. The Chu kingdom occupied mod- other languages and dialects spoken in China. ern Hubei and Hunan provinces. Some records of the vocabulary used in the Chu kingdom areas can be found 湘 汉 Xiang is one of the ten main Chinese Han in Fangyan, compiled by Yang Xiong (53 bce– 18 ce), and dialects, and is spoken primarily throughout Shuowen jiezi, compiled by Xu Shen in 100 ce. Both works Hunan Province. give the impression that the dialect spoken in the Chu kingdom had some strong local features. The dialects spoken in Chu were influenced strongly he Xiang dialect group is one of the recognized by northern Chinese migrants. The first group of mi- ten dialect groups of spoken Chinese. Some 34 grants came into Hunan in 307– 312 ce. Most of them million people throughout Hunan Province came from Henan and Shanxi provinces and occupied speak one of the Xiang dialects. Speakers are also found Anxiang, Huarong, and Lixian in Hunan. In the mid- in Sichuan and Guangxi provinces. Tang dynasty, a large group of northern people came to The Xiang dialect group is further divided into New Hunan following the Yuan River into western Hunan. The Xiang (spoken in the north) and Old Xiang (spoken in the third wave of migrants arrived at the end of the Northern south).
    [Show full text]
  • LANGUAGE CONTACT and AREAL DIFFUSION in SINITIC LANGUAGES (Pre-Publication Version)
    LANGUAGE CONTACT AND AREAL DIFFUSION IN SINITIC LANGUAGES (pre-publication version) Hilary Chappell This analysis includes a description of language contact phenomena such as stratification, hybridization and convergence for Sinitic languages. It also presents typologically unusual grammatical features for Sinitic such as double patient constructions, negative existential constructions and agentive adversative passives, while tracing the development of complementizers and diminutives and demarcating the extent of their use across Sinitic and the Sinospheric zone. Both these kinds of data are then used to explore the issue of the adequacy of the comparative method to model linguistic relationships inside and outside of the Sinitic family. It is argued that any adequate explanation of language family formation and development needs to take into account these different kinds of evidence (or counter-evidence) in modeling genetic relationships. In §1 the application of the comparative method to Chinese is reviewed, closely followed by a brief description of the typological features of Sinitic languages in §2. The main body of this chapter is contained in two final sections: §3 discusses three main outcomes of language contact, while §4 investigates morphosyntactic features that evoke either the North-South divide in Sinitic or areal diffusion of certain features in Southeast and East Asia as opposed to grammaticalization pathways that are crosslinguistically common.i 1. The comparative method and reconstruction of Sinitic In Chinese historical
    [Show full text]