Title HUON D'entrecasteaux BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Title HUON D'entrecasteaux BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT Title HUON D’ENTRECASTEAUX BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY Agenda Number 15.043/16* Strategic Plan Reference 4.3 File Reference 25/17 Author Regional Development Coordinator Responsible Officer Communications Officer Reporting Brief General Manager presenting a report from the Regional Development Coordinator on the Huon D’Entrecasteaux boundary adjustment community engagement summary. Background In May 2016, by way of Council resolution 13.008/16, the Council resolved as follows: That: a) Council notes it has received the report on the review of boundary adjustments and their economic implications from Bruce Felmingham Consulting. b) Council immediately writes to State Government and Kingborough Council to begin discussions around the M1 option as highlighted in the report. c) Council immediately begins work on public consultation d) Public consultation begins as of 1 July 2016 and that during that process option M1 be referred to as the Huon D’Entrecasteaux Option. Following this, at the June 2016 Council meeting and by resolution number 15.021/15, council endorsed the Community Engagement Plan for Huon D’Entrecasteaux Option. The engagement plan activities have been completed and the results are summarised in this report. Report In accordance with the Council endorsed community engagement plan the engagement commenced on 1 July 2016 and continued for a period of 6 weeks. The community were advised of the engagement process by way of advertisements in the • Huon News • Cygnet/Channel Classifieds • Dover Classifieds This is PAGE - 1030 / 2016 of the MINUTES for the Ordinary Meeting of Huon Valley Council held on 28 September 2016 Surveys were made available via electronic media as well as in hard copy in the following venues: • Cygnet Library • Huon Valley Council Customer Reception • Franklin Post Office • Geeveston Visitor Centre • Southgate Shopping Centre – Dover Copies of the survey and associated media are included in the Attachments to the Reports. Background information was provided prior to the questions and is included in the Attachments to the Reports. The questions asked in the survey were as follows: Question One: Do you want us to continue to investigate the feasibility of a boundary adjustment that expands the Huon Valley municipal area to include Margate South, the Channel and Bruny Island? Question Two: Please enter your postcode An additional comments box was also included which provided space for entering 250 characters. The on-line version of the survey was structured to ensure that one response per IP address only was allowed. This was to ensure that that a fair response was received without the possibility of `loading’ of one preference over another. However, IP blocking software does exist which may be used inappropriately to enable an IP address to respond to the survey multiple times. It is noted that the survey was tested from a number of computers and devices which all indicated that multiple responses to the survey were not possible. A total of 387 responses to the survey were received. This included • 352 completed online • 35 hard copies completed The responses are included in the Attachments to the Reports. Of these 7 were incomplete surveys and 2 contained non existent postcodes and therefore do not form part of the summary. Council received 5 emails from 2 residents (0.01% of the Huon Valley population) raising concerns in relation to the process of the community engagement. These have not been included in the summary of the results as they are beyond the survey questions and did not relate to them. Correspondence was also received from the Friends of North Bruny Island. This is included in the Attachments to the Reports. The following is a breakdown of the responses by municipal area. A detailed breakdown is included in the Attachments in the Reports. This is PAGE - 1031 / 2016 of the MINUTES for the Ordinary Meeting of Huon Valley Council held on 28 September 2016 Total No. Yes No YES NO Responses Kingborough 57 100 157 36% 64% Huon Valley 73 141 214 34% 66% Other Areas 4 3 7 57% 43% Combined 134 244 378 35% 65% This is a response rate of 1.41% of the Huon Valley population and 0.46% of the Kingborough municipal area population. Any use of the data from this survey should take into careful consideration this low response rate. The results of the survey indicate that in both municipal areas approximately 65% of respondents do not want Council to continue to investigate the feasibility of a boundary adjustment that expands the Huon Valley municipal area to include Margate South, the Channel and Bruny Island? The results indicate that those respondents in more central locations, such as the 7109 postcode – Huonville and surrounds, are roughly equal but the views towards “no” become more marked in the more remote postcode areas. The results of this survey, particularly given the very preliminary nature of the questions asked, and the very low response rate, need to be treated as, at best, indicative, of the community’s views. This is consistent with the purpose of the survey which was to obtain an early indication of the community’s views. It is therefore recommended that these results be used as was intended, to provide a preliminary view and to have regard to this in any future community engagement or discussions in relation to this matter. Consultations Consultation with the community was undertaken as set out in the Community Engagement Plan dated June 2016 under the guidelines of the IAP2. These guidelines can be located at www.iap2.org/ Legislative Requirements Nil Risk Implications There are a number of risks and these have been identified in the body of the report. Council Policy The Council’s Strategic Plan includes strategies: Strategy 4.3 Community Consultation: “To engage the community in a continuing conversation about the future of the Huon Valley based on mutual trust and as a genuine basis for decision making.” This is PAGE - 1032 / 2016 of the MINUTES for the Ordinary Meeting of Huon Valley Council held on 28 September 2016 Options In relation to the summary of the feedback from the survey Council has limited options. It does however, have options how it would now like to proceed in relation to this matter. This has largely previously been decided by Council by way of resolution 15.028/16*, that provides as follows: That: a) the Huon Valley Council thank Kingborough Council for the invitation and accepts their offer to resume discussions on Local Government Reform. b) the Huon Valley Council wishes to broaden the discussions to include Resource Sharing and Boundary Adjustments that will protect and enhance each Council’s service delivery and efficiency in the best interests of both Council’s and their respective communities. c) the Huon Valley Council does not support voluntary amalgamations at this time and will consider this option only after all other options have been exhausted. d) both Councils approach the State Government for funding to explore the two options detailed in (b) of this motion. As this is Council’s current position it is recommended that the survey result be considered as part of that process, noting the limitations of the data. Human Resource and Financial Implications Community engagement is absorbed within the approved budget for this project. 15.043/16* RECOMMENDATION CR WILSON CR LANGE That: a) The report on the Huon D’Entrecasteaux boundary adjustment community engagement summary be received and noted. b) The results of the survey are considered during the course of implementation of resolution 15.028/16*. AMENDMENT CR SMITH CR MACKINTOSH That: a) The report on the Huon D’Entrecasteaux boundary adjustment community engagement summary be received and noted. THE AMENDMENT WAS PUT AND LOST • Councillors Coad, Smith, Mackintosh and Lange voted for the amendment and Councillors Paul, Wilson, Heron and Ruzicka voted against the amendment. This is PAGE - 1033 / 2016 of the MINUTES for the Ordinary Meeting of Huon Valley Council held on 28 September 2016 THE MOTION WAS PUT AND CARRIED • Councillors Paul, Wilson, Heron, Ruzicka and Lange voted for the motion and Councillors Coad, Smith and Mackintosh voted against the motion. This is PAGE - 1034 / 2016 of the MINUTES for the Ordinary Meeting of Huon Valley Council held on 28 September 2016 Huon D’Entrecasteaux Boundary Adjustment Huon D’Entrecasteaux Boundary Adjustment Your views are valuable in assisting us to determine whether to Your views are valuable in assisting us to determine whether to move to the next level of analysis. move to the next level of analysis. Do you want us to continue to investigate the Do you want us to continue to investigate the YES YES feasibility of a boundary adjustment that feasibility of a boundary adjustment that expands the Huon Valley municipal area to expands the Huon Valley municipal area to NO include Margate South, the Channel and NO include Margate South, the Channel and Bruny Island? (PLEASE CIRCLE) Bruny Island? (PLEASE CIRCLE) Please enter your postcode Please enter your postcode Please provide any additional comments or feedback Please provide any additional comments or feedback ......................................................................................................................................... ......................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • AGENDA This Agenda Is Provided for the Assistance and Information of Members of the Public
    PUBLIC AGENDA This Agenda is provided for the assistance and information of members of the public. AGENDA NOTICE is hereby given that an Ordinary meeting of the Kingborough Council will be held in the Civic Centre, Kingston on Wednesday, 13 December 2017 at 5.30pm Back (L – R): Cr Paul Chatterton, Cr Mike Percey, Cr Sue Bastone, Cr Dean Winter, Cr Richard Atkinson Front (L – R): Cr Dr Graham Bury, Cr Flora Fox, Mayor Cr Steve Wass, Deputy Mayor Cr Paula Wriedt, Cr David Grace QUALIFIED PERSONS In accordance with Section 65 of the Local Government Act 1993, I confirm that the reports contained in Council Meeting Agenda No. 26 to be held on Wednesday, 13 December 2017 contain advice, information and recommendations given by a person who has the qualifications or experience necessary to give such advice, information or recommendations. TONY FERRIER ACTING GENERAL MANAGER 7 December 2017 ORDER OF BUSINESS Open Session Page No. Apologies 2 Confirmation of Minutes of Council Meeting No. 25 held on 27 November 2017 2 Workshops held Since Council Meeting on 27 November 2017 2 Declarations of Interest 2 Transfer of Agenda Items 3 Guidelines for Public Question Time 3 Questions on Notice from the Public 4 Questions Without Notice from the Public 4 Questions on Notice from Councillors 4 1 New Flight Paths Over Kettering and Bruny Island 4 2 Bees 5 3 Budget and Community Involvement 5 4 Convict Stone Wall Repair, Bonnet Hill 6 5 Snug Beach 6 6 Old Vodafone Site, Huntingfield 7 7 Kingston Beach Pontoon 7 8 Delegated Authority Policy 8 Questions Without Notice from Councillors 8 Motions of Which Notice has been Given 8 Petitions Still Being Actioned 8 Petitions Received in Last Period 8 Officers Reports to Planning Authority 9 Delegated Authority for the Period 15 November 2017 to 28 November 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT Kingborough Sport and Recreation Facilities
    DRAFT Kingborough Sport and Recreation Facilities Strategy 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 2.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 5 2.1 PURPOSE OF STRATEGY 6 2.2 STUDY AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 7 2.3 VISION 7 2.4 PLANNING PRINCIPLES 8 2.5 METHODOLOGY 9 2.6 STRATEGY CONTEXT 10 3.0 REVIEW OF RELEVANT REPORTS/STRATEGIES 10 3.1 STATE AND REGIONAL PLANS 10 3.2 KINGBOROROUGH COUNCILS STRATEGIES AND PLANS 13 4.0 CONSULTATION 17 4.1 STAKEHOLDER SURVEY’S 18 4.2 KEY ISSUES FROM CONSULTATION 19 5.0 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE 20 5.1 DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE KINGBOROUGH MUNICIPALITY 21 6.0 PARTICIPATION TRENDS 23 6.1 BROADER SPORT AND RECREATION TRENDS 25 6.2 UNSTRUCTURED/NON COMPETITIVE/CASUAL RECREATION ACTIVITIES 25 6.3 MODIFICATION OF SPORTS 25 6.4 VOLUNTEERS 26 6.5 CHANGING PATTERNS OF WORK 26 6.6 ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY 26 6.7 IMPLICATIONS FOR SPORT AND RECREATION PLANNING 27 7.0 FACILITY NEEDS AND ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 28 7.1 TRACKS AND TRAILS 28 7.2 SPORTS PAVILIONS, OVALS AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES 29 8.0 STRATEGIES 30 8.1 SPORTS COURTS (OUTDOOR) 30 8.2 NETBALL FACILITIES 32 8.3 SPORTS PAVILION REDEVELOPMENT AND IMPROVEMENT 33 8.4 SPORTSGROUNDS AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES 37 8.5 RECREATIONAL TRAILS 40 8.6 KINGBOROUGH SPORTS CENTRE 44 8.7 OTHER RECREATION FACILITIES 45 9.0 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 46 10.0 APPENDIX 54 DRAFT: Kingborough Sport and Recreation Facilities Strategy 2012 Page 2 Version 1 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Kingborough Sport and Recreation Facilities Strategy (KSRFS) has been developed to provide a clear, planned and pragmatic approach to the development of new sport and recreation facilities as well as the upgrading of existing facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Kingborough Council's Bruny Island Ragwort Program Review And
    Kingborough Council’s Bruny Island Ragwort Program Review and Action Plan An independent evaluation of the effectiveness and efficiency of Kingborough Council's ragwort management practices on Bruny Island May 2018 Beth Chamberlain [email protected] Telephone: 0400 641 46 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author acknowledges the generous assistance of the following people: Rene Raichert, Liz Quinn, Scott Corbett & Cara Broke (Kingborough Council); Kim (Alonnah Post Office); Anne (Bruny News); Karen Stuart (Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment); Richard Clarke & Trevor Adams (Bruny Island Primary Industries Group & Bruny Island Advisory Committee); Fran Davies (Bruny Island Community Association); Bob Graham & Daniel Sprod (Bruny Island Environment Network); Bernard Edwards & Scott Thornton (Tasmanian Parks & Wildlife Service); Kristen Dransfield (Sustainable Timbers Tasmania); Jill Jones (State Growth); James Gourlay (Crown Land Services); Richard Holloway (Consultant – Bio-control); Cassie Strain (Environmental Consultant); Ellen Davis (Tasmanian Farmers and Graziers Association); Phil Barker & Sue Jungalwalla (North Barker Ecosystem Services); Alison Hughes (Huon Valley Council); and the Bruny Island community. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 AIM 1 2 INTRODUCTION 1 2.1 Purpose of the Ragwort Review 1 2.2 Project Scope 2 2.3 Background 2 2.4 Compliance 2 2.5 Bruny Island - Geography 3 3 REVIEW METHOD 4 3.1 Guiding principles 4 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 7 4.1 Kingborough Council’s Ragwort Management Program 7 4.1.1 Is eradication
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2007-08
    Annual Report 2007-08 Department of Premier and Cabinet © Crown in the Right of the State of Tasmania 2008 For copies or further information regarding this annual report please contact: Department of Premier and Cabinet GPO Box 123 HOBART Tasmania 7001 Phone: (03) 6233 3738 Fax: (03) 6233 2769 Email: [email protected] Website: www.dpac.tas.gov.au ISSN 1448 9023 (print) ISSN 1448 9031 (online) This report is printed on carbon neutral paper Department of Premier and Cabinet GPO Box 123 HOBART TAS 7001 Phone: (03) 6233 3738 Fax: (03) 6233 2769 Email: [email protected] Website: www.dpac.tas.gov.au David Bartlett, MP PREMIER Dear Premier In accordance with the requirements of Section 36(1) of the State Service Act 2000 and Section 27 of the Financial Management and Audit Act 1990, I enclose for presentation to Parliament, the 2007-08 Annual Report of the Department of Premier and Cabinet. Yours sincerely Rhys Edwards Secretary 17 October 2008 The Department of Premier and Cabinet (DPAC) is a central agency of the Tasmanian State Government. The Department is responsible to the Premier and the Minister for Local Government as portfolio ministers, and also provides support to the Parliamentary Secretary and other members of Cabinet. The Department provides a broad range of services to the Cabinet, other members of Parliament, Government agencies and the community. The Department works closely with the public sector, the community, local government, the Australian Government and other state and territory governments. The Department also provides administration support to the State Service Commissioner and the Tasmania Together Progress Board, each of which is separately accountable and reports directly to Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Assembly Tuesday 3 September 2019
    Tuesday 3 September 2019 The Speaker, Ms Hickey, took the Chair at 10 a.m. acknowledged the Traditional People, and read Prayers. MESSAGE FROM GOVERNOR Resignation - Mr Scott Bacon MP Madam SPEAKER - Honourable members, I wish to advise that have I received the following correspondence from Her Excellency the Governor, dated 23 August 2019. It is addressed to the Hon Sue Hickey MP, Speaker of the House of Assembly, Parliament House - Dear Madam Speaker I have today received a letter dated 22 August 2019 from Mr Scott Bacon MP tendering his resignation as a Member for Clark in the House of Assembly effective from Thursday 22 August 2019. I have instructed the Electoral Commissioner to proceed in accordance with the provisions of Part 9 of the Electoral Act 2004. Yours sincerely, C A Warner, Governor RECOGNITION OF VISITORS Madam SPEAKER - Honourable members, I ask you to give a hearty welcome to grade 6 students from Sacred Heart College. Welcome to parliament. I also welcome all our members and guests in the parliament. Members - Hear, hear. QUESTIONS Tasmanian Industrial Commission - Submission re Pay Rate for Speaker Ms WHITE question to PREMIER, Mr HODGMAN [10.04 a.m.] The Liberal member for Clark, Sue Hickey, has outraged the Tasmanian public by arguing that she deserves a pay rise at a time when many Tasmanians are struggling to keep their heads above water. How can you justify the Liberal Party's argument for higher pay for one of the highest paid people in the parliament? Was this pay rise a condition or your deal to bring the member for Clark back into the tent to make sure you shore up your chaotic and dysfunctional Government? 1 3 September 2019 ANSWER Madam Speaker, I thank the Leader of the Opposition for her question.
    [Show full text]
  • DIVISION FINDER 2019 Division Finder
    2019 COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA 2019 DIVISION FINDER Division Finder Tasmania TAS EF54 EF54 i © Commonwealth of Australia 2019 This work is copyright. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced by any means, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, scanning,2018 recording or otherwise, without the written consent of the Australian Electoral COMMONWEALTHCommission. OF AUSTRALIA All enquiries should be directed to the Australian Electoral Commission, 2018 DIVISION FINDER Locked Bag 4007, Canberra ACT 2601. Division Finder Tasmania TAS EF54 EF54 ii iii Contents Instructions For Use And Other Information Pages v-xiii INTRODUCTION Detailed instructions on how to use the various sections of the Division Finder. DIVISIONAL OFFICES A list of all divisional offices within the State showing physical and postal addresses, and telephone and facsimile numbers. INSTITUTIONS AND ESTABLISHMENTS A list of places of residence such as Universities, Hospitals, Defence Bases and Caravan Parks. This list may be of assistance in identifying institutions or establishments that cannot be found using the Locality and Street Sections. Locality Section Pages 1-9 This section lists all of the suburbs, towns and localities within the State of Tasmania and the name of the corresponding electoral division the locality is contained in, or the reference ... See Street Section. Street Section Pages 13-19 This section lists all the streets for those localities in the Locality Section which have the reference ... See Street Section. Each street listing shows the electoral division the street is contained in. iv v Introduction The Division Finder is the official list used to Electors often do not know the correct identify the federal electoral division of the federal division in which they are enrolled, place an elector claims to be enrolled at.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2014 P.P
    SEPTEMBER 2014 P.P. No. 100003422 Federal Funding Cuts Begin to Bite Kingborough Council Leads the Way in Kayak Safety Highlights of the 2014 Local Government Conference Bushfires...at what cost? Putting your Best Foot Forward: Professionalism in Local Government CMYK CMYK Precast concrete solutions Humes, a division of Holcim Ltd., one of the world’s leading suppliers of cement and aggregates, offers a range of solutions for bridges and platforms, road and rail infrastructure, tunnels and shafts, retaining walls, pipeline systems, water treatment, reuse and detention, and traffic management. We can customise our solutions to ensure they create maximum value for your project, accommodating your site conditions, design requirements and construction factors. Call 1300 361 601 or visit humes.com.au for more information. Copyright 2011 Holcim (Australia) Pty Ltd ABN 87 09 732 297 Strength. Performance. Passion. CMYK CMYK inside this issue Editor: 13 18 Stephanie Watson Local Government Association of Tasmania 326 Macquarie Street, Hobart Tasmania 7000 Postal address: GPO Box 1521, Hobart, Tasmania 7001 Telephone: (03) 6233 5966 Facsimile: (03) 6233 5986 Email: [email protected] Website: www.lgat.tas.gov.au LGAT News is circulated to every member council throughout Tasmania. Circulation also includes senior government staff, state parliamentarians, interstate and national local government representative bodies and private companies operating in Tasmania. 31 41 The views expressed in LGAT News are not necessarily endorsed by the Local Government Association of Tasmania. No responsibility is President’s Report .................................................................2 accepted by the publishers, the editor or printer for the accuracy of information contained in the text or advertisements.
    [Show full text]
  • Huon Valley Council Community Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Footprint Summary Report May 2019
    HUON VALLEY COUNCIL COMMUNITY ENERGY USE AND GREENHOUSE GAS FOOTPRINT SUMMARY REPORT MAY 2019 PUBLISHING DETAILS The Southern Tasmanian Regional and Municipal Energy and Emissions Project 2018, was endorsed in the Regional Climate Change Initiative (RCCI) Action Plan 2017-2019, by the Board of the Southern Tasmanian Councils Authority (STCA) in June 2017. First published by Southern Tasmanian Councils Authority, Regional Climate Change Initiative April 2019. STCA RCCI PO Box 503 Hobart TAS 7001 stca.tas.gov.au This work is copyright and may be reproduced in whole or part for study, training and project purposes subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgement of the source, but not for commercial sale or use. Reproduction for purposes other than those listed requires permissions from the Southern Tasmanian Councils Authority. © Copyright Southern Tasmanian Councils Authority 2019 CITING THIS REPORT: Johnson, A. 2019 ‘Huon Valley Council Community Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Footprint’, Southern Tasmanian Councils Authority ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS PROJECT MANAGER Katrina Graham, Climate Change Officer, City of Hobart, Coordinator Regional Climate Change Initiative LEAD ANALYST Alison Johnson, Energy and Greenhouse Climate Consultant The STCA acknowledges organisations that assisted with the finalisation of the community greenhouse gas and energy profile: City of Hobart developed and piloted the initial methodology for community emissions TasNetworks provided residential and commercial/industrial sector electricity data Australian Government, Clean Energy Regulator for commercial/industrial data to fact check final results DISCLAIMER While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of the Report are correct, the Southern Tasmanian Councils Authority does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of its contents and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Services in Tasmania
    RSL TASMANIA BRANCH ANZAC DAY SERVICES AROUND TASMANIA ANZAC Day services will be conducted around Tasmania at the following locations: Beaconsfield Dawn Service 6.00am Beaconsfield Cenotaph (followed by breakfast at Ophir Hotel) Main Parade 10.45 Assemble in West St Main Service 11.00am Beaconsfield Cenotaph Bagdad Dawn Service 6.30am Bagdad Community Club (followed by breakfast) Bicheno Dawn Service 6.00am Assemble outside IGA, short march to the Bicheno Cenotaph Main Parade 10.45am Assemble outside IGA Main Service 11.00am Bicheno Cenotaph Bishopsbourne Main Service 9.00am Bishopsbourne Cenotaph (followed by morning tea) Bridport Dawn Service 6.00am Bridport Cenotaph Main Service 11.00am Bridport Hall Brighton Dawn Service 6.00am Veterans Memorial Centre (followed by breakfast at the Coronation Hall) Bruny Island Dawn Service 6.00am Bruny Island Cenotaph Burnie Dawn Service 6.00am Burnie Cenotaph (followed by breakfast at RSL) Main parade 10.40am Assemble Burnie RSL Civic Service 11.00am Burnie Cenotaph (followed by lunch at RSL) Campbell Town Dawn Service 6.00am Campbell Town Cenotaph Main parade 10.30am Assemble at Old Post Office Main Service 11.00am Campbell Town Cenotaph Claremont Dawn Service 6.00am Claremont RSL (followed by breakfast at RSL) Main parade 8.45am Assemble on Main Road, Claremont Main Service 9.00am Claremont RSL Clarence/Rosny Dawn Service 6.00am War Memorial (behind Rosny college) (followed by breakfast Rosny Park Bowls Club) Cressy Main Service 9.00am Cressy Cenotaph (followed by morning tea) Cygnet Dawn Service
    [Show full text]
  • Council Email Address Web Site Mayor General Manager
    COUNCIL EMAIL ADDRESS WEB SITE MAYOR GENERAL MANAGER Break O'Day Council [email protected] http://www.bodc.tas.gov.au Mayor Mick Tucker Mr John Brown Brighton Council [email protected] http://www.brighton.tas.gov.au Mayor Tony Foster Mr James Dryburgh Burnie City Council [email protected] http://www.burnie.net Mayor Steve Kons Mr Andrew Wardlaw Central Coast Council [email protected] http://www.centcoast.tas.gov.au Mayor Jan Bonde Ms Sandra Ayton Central Highlands Council [email protected] http://www.centralhighlands.tas.gov.au Mayor Loueen Triffitt Ms Lyn Eyles Circular Head Council [email protected] http://www.circularhead.tas.gov.au Mayor Daryl Quilliam Mr Scott Riley Clarence, City Of [email protected] http://www.ccc.tas.gov.au Mayor Doug Chipman Mr Ian Nelson Derwent Valley Council [email protected] http://www.derwentvalley.tas.gov.au Mayor Ben Shaw Mr Dean Griggs Devonport City Council [email protected] http://www.devonport.tas.gov.au Mayor Annette Rockliff Mr Matthew Atkins Dorset Council [email protected] http://www.dorset.tas.gov.au Mayor Greg Howard Mr Tim Watson Flinders Council [email protected] http://www.flinders.tas.gov.au Mayor Annie Revie Mr Warren Groves George Town Council [email protected] http://www.georgetown.tas.gov.au Mayor Greg Kieser Mr Shane Power Glamorgan Spring Bay Council [email protected] http://www.gsbc.tas.gov.au Mayor Jenny Woods (A/g) Ms Marissa Walters (A/g) Glenorchy City Council
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Review 1999/2000
    MINERAL RESOURCES TASMANIA Tasmania DEPARTMENTof INFRASTRUCTURE, ENERGY and RESOURCES A Division of the Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources Annual Review 1999/2000 Mineral Resources Tasmania PO Box 56 Rosny Park Tasmania 7018 Phone: (03) 6233 8377 l Fax: (03) 6233 8338 Email: [email protected] l Internet: www.mrt.tas.gov.au Mineral Resources Tasmania CONTENTS Mineral Resources Tasmania — Divisional overview …………………………………… 5 Financial performance …………………………………………………………… 9 Performance indicators ………………………………………………………… 11 Review of MRT activities branch activities, 1998/1999 ………………………………… 15 Metallic Minerals and Geochemistry ……………………………………………… 15 Industrial Minerals, Environment and Tenement Management ……………………… 18 Engineering Geology and Groundwater …………………………………………… 28 GIS and Geophysics …………………………………………………………… 30 Data Management ……………………………………………………………… 35 Publications …………………………………………………………………… 35 Library ………………………………………………………………………… 36 Mineral Sector Overview……………………………………………………………… 38 Value of the Tasmanian mineral industry ………………………………………… 39 Mineral exploration expenditure ………………………………………………… 41 Metal prices and future trends …………………………………………………… 42 Review of Mineral Sector Operations ………………………………………………… 45 Metallic minerals ……………………………………………………………… 45 Non-metallic minerals …………………………………………………………… 54 Fuel minerals …………………………………………………………………… 59 Mineral processing operations …………………………………………………… 61 Annual Report, Rehabilitation of Mining Lands Trust Fund …………………………… 65 2 1999/2000 Annual Review Mineral Resources Tasmania
    [Show full text]
  • LG Tas Sept 2019
    Snug Falls September 2019 KINGBOROUGH COUNCIL TURNING RECYCLING INTO ROAD You may not know it, but if you’re Close the Loop and RED Group. The initiative demonstrates the driving in the coastal town of Snug, you Kingborough Council is committed importance of councils, industries could be driving on the equivalent of to trying to reduce its environmental and the community working together 173,600 plastic bags and packaging and footprint through waste minimisation to create economic, social and 82,500 glass bottles! As well as beautiful and finding environmentally responsible environmental value for products that scenery, Snug boasts Tasmania’s first solutions for waste. Council estimates would likely end up in landfill, stockpiled, ‘recycled road’. that the 500 metres of road in Snug or as a pollutant in our natural is about equivalent to two years of environments. Kingborough Council is the first single use plastic collected from the With councils around Australia starting Tasmanian council to construct a road Kingborough municipality. Following a to use the waste sourced additive to using waste diverted from landfill. successful trial in Snug, Kingborough asphalt, Local Government may be able Along with soft plastics and glass, toner Council is now is now resurfacing to make a real difference by reducing from approximately 5,900 used printer further roads with Reconphalt including waste and carbon emissions and cartridges and more than 33 tonnes of Baynton Street, Lucas Street, Harris providing longer lasting roads. recycled asphalt have been repurposed Court and Cleburne Street. to create 330 tonnes of asphalt. The waste products are melted down into Roads that are built from repurposed an additive to asphalt, creating a non- waste products are slightly more polluting product that consumes waste, expensive to construct that standard known as Reconphalt.
    [Show full text]