An Evaluation of Fishery and Aquaculture Programs of the Agency for International Development an E Alato Offshr A~Ndaquculureprogram CO
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
An Evaluation of Fishery and Aquaculture Programs of the Agency for International Development an E alato ofFshr a~ndAquculureProgram CO. e A... for Int National DeveloDment Marine Techn;.ca Aitatnce Group Ocea Policy Committee . Comimisdon on Physica Sciences, Mathematics, and Resources National Resarh Council NaI onal Academy Press Wainbhe~on, D.C.1962. .NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing" Dard of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the comittee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. This report has been raviewed by a group other than the authors according to procedures approved by a Report Review Committee consisting of members of the Natinnal Rcademy of Sciences, the National Acadamy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The National Research Council was established by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy's purposes of furthering knowledge and of advising the federal government. The Council operates in accordance with general policies detormined by the Academy under the authority of its congressional charter uf 1863, which establishes the Academy as a private, nonprofit, self-governing membership corporation. The Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in the conduct of their services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. It is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. The National Academy of Engineering and the Institute of Medicine were established in 1964 and 1970, respectively, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences. Available from Ocean Policy Committee .National Academy of Sciences 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20418 Printed in the United States of America .Mamn) a It ittion 1. ooumza ghvrat of MFArland; J0 P. Ea Vi.. tisito. of ...-... +I~i II j. N w ivritI*s of-lout ern California Om_0. GZUS3] noboeg, laska ipInstitotlo of Ocanography G. *661A!, Orgon W4t niest JUSX .KIW6,r. Moashtts Institute of Techology JoUW A..UAUSS+ Oniversity oofe, sla d JON Lim", Uiversity of shington CHA lE-m ImWG, Carnegie Andowent for International Peace JO 5.mr5.- Unlwrsity of Wisconsin Madison R.0. RE*LT, i-Univrslty of California, San Diego DAVID A. BS, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution MIY HOPE KAT O n, NationalReserob Council, Executive .ecretar, 1mA TC.ICRCAL ,AfI8TARN OP *J0wM LISWO (Chairman), University of Washington DItNHARDL. ,ASSANM11SU, University: of Denver JOWMoP.ClAUIvI, University of HaWaii" " VIC WIwS, Universi"ty of Delaware .RICAR 3.-mm ,=Denver,- Colorado Womm VELZ, Univeriity. of California San DiegO OAVID &. RMOS, i"oods Hole Oceano'graphic Institution WaISa 3. STUR'v, JRl.,Old Dominion Uhiveriy *0IRISTOPS3I. K. VRZRIP0OL, ichigmn state Uiversity *1P.AI8CIS WILLAI,, Oniversity:of Miami *Nsmber of Marine Technical Assistaince Group'lvaluation Team John V. Byrne, Ovegon State University, Was a Member Of the Ocean Policy. Comitt.ee and the 14arine Technical. Assistance Group frm 1979 until February 1981. AiL CaMSUGPIOM: ON PHYSICAL SCIRJCIA, AATBHWTICS, - 33OUs.. BROR FRIDPM (Ce-Chairman), National Research Council ROBUT N. WHITE (Co-C~ikaan)', University Corporation for Atmospheric Rosearoh STANLEY I. AUIUMCH, Oak Ridge National Laboratory ELKAm 'R B TLOUHarvardNedical School WILLIAM iOWDER, Princeton UniVersity BUMAD F. aldoE Nanai"husettw Institute of technology HIMAN.CE3IMpO, MassachusettsI nstitute of Technology WALTZRAH. NCKSUV , Exxon Corporation JOSEPH L. FISHER, Office of the Governor, Cowwmnvealth of Virginia JAWS C. PL&M IBR, University of Pittsburgh WILLIM A. FONLZR, CallIornia Institute of Technology GEMART FRIEDLAUDER, Brookhaven National Laboratory EDISRD A* FRIEIANl, Science Applications# Inc. WNAMD D. GOLDBI, Scripps Institution Of Oceanography KONRAD B. KPAUSKOPF Stanford university CHALES. 7,NAVKIN, Oklhom Geological Survey WALTER k.. MUI, University of California, San Diego WOROF.M"ELm, New York University Medical Center DANIEL A. OKUN, University of. North Carolina Gaon= 3. PA1l, Xerox Research Center DAVID PIME1TZL, Cornell Univerbity CHARLES K. DIED, Nctional-Research Council HATTRI S YODO..R, JR., Carnegie Institution of Washington iv EXCUTI gm8my 1 Purpose, Methodo1ogy 2 PISEAIS POGMAMS WITHIN TuE AGZNCT FOR INTMT1OUM DWWSWN1 11 3 EVALUATION o0 TUE KoREAN FISUES VWITALI I TOt PWGRAfi 16 4. AD GRAWT T'OU.S. uNIVZRSITIES 23 International Center for arine Resodrces Development, University of Rhode Island International Center for Aquaculture, kburn University Problems in the 211(d) Mechanics 5' OTER MNCHANI S FO FISHERIES ASSISTANCE 40 6 ,.CONCLUSIONS AND RDCHUNCI DATIONS 44 MOTES- 62 mzRMv Cs 64 Appendix A-. Snuary Tables of AID Fisheries/Aquaculture Programs A.11 Sumary of Fishery. and Aquaculture Projects of AID 67 A.2 Fishery and Aquacuitue Projects, of the Agency for International:Developeent and. Auburn Un versity. iwwkr of Projocto and Expndiure 7 A.3 1Fishery and Aquacaiture Projects of the Agency for I"tarnatonal..Deve ant 4nd Auburn University: Duration of Pr0jects and Nur of Developing Country Personnel n72 AppendiM Is8 Inmary Ivaluatlons of Selected. AID flaberles Programs 3.1. Indian il?,shertes Development Progra 73 B3 Guinean Irawllng Survey 77 5.3 BaSt Afrtican Freshwater Fisheries Project 81 3.4 Ibilippirt Fisheries Davelopment 65 .A4ndixCs Inventtory of AID Projects In Fisheries and Aquaculture 89 .vi This evaluation of fishories programs of the Agency for International P veloPuent (AID) was undertaken by the utrine Technical Assistance Graup (MY ), o ..the Ocean Policy Coittee, in repons Io a requost from that agency. It is part of a larger study of U.S. technical assistance and ration in oceanography, marine f!shbries" and inland fisheries, including aquaculture. This report includea a brief .review of the pattern of AID asliStance efforts in fisherlea since World War IU, detA2led analysis of three major fM. heries programs, sumaries of a number of regional program, and a eries g -,onolusipm and reooammndations on how the effectiveness of future programs might be improved. Immediately following World War I, U.S. foreign assistance in fisheries was directed mainly toward the development. of modern commercial fisheries as a means to strengthen the ioonomies and rapidly. increase the food supply in countries with serious food deficits. Thi. effort involved large-scale programs to provide boatsr, gear, harbors, and: processing equipment and to retrain local fishermen and fisheri4a wOrkers in the use of modern euipmlnt. Usually AID was directly responsible for hiring experts and supervising programs. Large-scale program in Korea and India followed this'pattern, as did a number of smaller programs in other parts of the world. During the.late 19605, U.S. foreign assistance began to be directed ore Specifically toward the poorest people in developing countries. Large industrial fisheries development programs were curtailed in .favor of ad gPr~ojects, generally tied to agricultural development program.- AIID attached a lover d priority to fisheries during this period and most of the agan..,'8 own expertise in fisheries was lost. .AID did serve as the lead U.S. agency in a domestic program largely carried out by the Vuieeu of Comercial riserie (now the National arine fisheries Servie) during the late 1960a to develop a process for production of fish protein concentrate. The program was a failure a-d 'further reduced AID interest in marine fisheries"as a target for d1velopmet assistance. 2 More recently there hss been increased interest in fisheries within AID, much of it directed toward aquaculture. However, fisheries activities are accorded a relatively minor position within the administrative structure of AID, and funding for fisheries programs constitutes only a small portion of AID's expenditures for enhancement of food production techniques. At leaat three factors justify an expanded fisheries program within AID: * Congressional support for such an increase is indicated by the inclusion of Sea Grant Colleges within the Title XII revision of the Foreign Assistance Act and .by the inclusion of fisheries as a priority area of food production. * Limitations in agricultural production are becoming apparent in the decreasing amount of land available for agriculture and in the increasing marginal cost of agricultural production. Fisheries assistance often has been suggested as an economical alternative to enhancement of agricultural production. * Developing countries are expressing increased interest in exploiting and controlling the resources within their recently acquired 200-mile exclusive economic zones, and the United States has an interest in gaining access to these zones for trade, scientific research, and for defense purposes. The report considers the following project mechanisms used by AID to support fisheries programs: 1. Direct funding and supervision of programs by AID, usually involving AID employees in an operational capacity in a foreign country. 2. Use of U.S. universities as sources of expertise and sometimes as management entities for development programs. 3. Funding through a regional or international organization,