DOCSLIB.ORG

S Den Anniversary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
S Den Anniversary t Ukr-- re un-iU- for o New stutktvi th flh t FACiriC FOWM A LIGHT tCfTJON Shopping Ronge a rv!-r- if r- - Wrr tu th Wa.fsiRgton CANAL STILL ICIVCS WATTAOK : Gam IV ('4'tmf.t POf im rear a nt k I I TW ranal built l ilCf fftfin Ilia LEACCJI IN REGION ljrt'4!'iii i,i Altti tn CUfont MaWo kuio u iiHt the pi 1 Wiiiamritt V!!r was la tue ba!U in your lijihtirtfjMr !''' 4 t u. t m niaj if artery tuttur. the Jlsun . lm ruUn Ufi-c-i- t r tianjtiatlvn numtw-- if any ii'i-miiit'- it .Hjiniiam an4 I lrtitlr Inmuute. Nott the bulb rlU!c UUlUV In !! I'aUfie UUtnrUt Sut.kiiwr.lly MaMaftf rmmn,Iatlons hen 1 it d a kitikll ULU..IJLJ - jHiurii-- rlcitilc hy. )uu buy a future. Too blf a bulb frt- 1 1 'J H4t.r rukU-mc-r- . tat Imi ami Matrr MhtvU fur a can overheat the - fixtures, crack 10 CU trl- twite kuttx-tlbrt- s -r T1 4 - and m it vt tnanutaiiurinf Un( itt gists shielding and shorten '.l ruktontrrs. 4i, I milU at Albany, he bulb life. i - 7 ' M of As , aV l! !- - '.) I was a In the Every household whether tepee or mansion protpect 1920's when use of electric appliances were promoted by Pacllle naa Power & Light Company's own salesmen.- All company outcee displays of latest "electric Uing- advantages, as accepiance ei ap- became established, the company turned Its promotional pliances . a t naif I - efforts to assisting local appliance aeaiers in rrk "-- Thomas A. Edison's dynamo was the basic oquipmant in tho 18S0s Itiee. lor many pioneering plants in what is now Paclltc Fo war land. Ado quato (or their era. the small output would supply only a traction PP&L Lake of energy utd by the smallest towns today. Tax Payments Large Develops As a taxpaylng citizen and Parks For Public POWER GENERATORS KEEP PACE of local government supporter In fields. Pa services Pacific Power Pioneer mny Light Power & in state ciflc Light Company WITH REGION'S ELECTRICAL NEEDS Comapny paid $6,295,000 also was among the first elec and local taxes for 1959. trtcal utilities to provide Its cus tomers and neighbors a recrea Demand lor electric energy more efficient As housewives be When the projected Muddy tonal area the water and labor on utilizing builds like compound Interest. can learning the time and Meadows projects high and shorline of company hydro In the Pacific Northwest the saving miracles of electricity, the Lewis are completed, water electric turned to elec will turn developments. need for electric power at the and as Industries from the high reaches Merwin a forerunner of trie new and six on the Park, end of each r period Is power, larger plants generators at projects an extensive and roc were It into the continuing twice what It was at the begin built Lewis before flows reational carried on standards these Columbia. The PP&L hydroelec development nlng. By today's by Pacific Power on Washing earlv-d.i- v nower are trie will have a generat Pacific Power L Light Com stations projects ton's scenic Lewis River, has some were int capacity exceeding 670,000 pany. meeting Its public utility small, but engineer- been a popular picnic and swim has and ing feats in their day. The Tygh kilowatts. for residents of Hunttrt con'f b too cortful with fir in th wood. responsibility, planned of mlng park the for 50 to have the Valley power plant south The Pacific Power is preparing as Pacific for more built years was the Northwest power for Its customers Dalles, Ore., for Instance, well, however, for the day not than 25 An of ready of a economical years. average When fir breaks loot it food an J cover for when want It built at the bottom steep far distant when all 100.000 visit the destroys they mate- In North persons picnic - canyon and construction hydroelectric power the each summer to swim In 1910 a Pacific Power spokes- down an grounds rials were transported west has been developed and the -k- man amazed an audience in Lake Merwin, to play Softball -- Good gath aerial The pow- must turn to coal or swU gome that took Nature years to flrow. huntert ered In Walla Walla to hear tramway. plant's reelon or horseshoes or Just to lVw er was 2,250 kilo sources. It has pitch 'A,n the new with the capacity only nuclear already laze in the sun. t about company watts a as compared with over 150 million tons statement that $30 million would drop proved up New recreational on the woodsmen. or cartful with one of fhe Swift 68,000 of suitable for parks ere good They ciga be In the next 20 to plant's coal strip mining shores of the reservoirs behind spent years kilowatt generators. near Wash., and an assure Pacific's customers all capacity Centralia, Merwin, Yale and Swift dams Condit built in 1912 other 50 million tons in south the power they needed. The plant were the past year rcttts, maiches and campfires. 13 on the White Salmon River western Oregon. developed but the and proved popu- Policy hasn't changed, In With other utilities PP&L is immediately to Washington was another engi lar. A is at amounts of money needed for there snonsorlng research aimed at typical park Speclyal work and vast veering achievement, Bay on Lake Merwin. It Includes finance the the fwere no in the wilderness the day when elec- of roads hastening area for kid quantities power produced area. Materials, men, food and tricity from nuclear power can protected wading have greatly increased. Its customers eco dles, a warming shelter with fuel had to be transported up the be provided a con Two years ago PP&L com nomically. fireplace, picnic tables, its 268,000 kilowatt Swlt crete boat launching ramp and iAIt pleted The Condit plant's 9,600 kilo area. hydroelectric project on the watts made It large for Its day. large parking LaCiM Bir cfct ww emu Mnamn Lewis River a major part of So was the Big Fork plant near Fishermen use the lakes In KEEP OREGON GREEH a record program and a project Kallspell, Mont. great numbers. The long cost twice as much that nearly Later, L. T. Merwln, who engi as the 20-ye- spend- company's neered the Condit ex 4IHHIIHHMIIIIMIMMIieillMHIHHIHIMHIHtlllHIIIIMIHIHmiHIIIHIMHHIimHimiHMHIIIHIlllll forceast in 1910. project, ing program plored the Lewis River as a Projects Assure Supply power supply close to Portland. In the past ten years Pacific The company's pioneering dam Power spent $105 million dollars on the Lewis at Ariel later was to bring in 500,000 kilowatts of renamed Merwin Dam to honor to Grain new power generation supply the engineer. Mmm C!jiin)iy Growers its customers' needs. In growing Water Flow d Pacific contracted to addition, Above Merwin Dam now stand take a total of 560,000 kilowatts Yale dam and the RCDDT K&OWATT from three dams now under con- recently Your tlctri Srvret struction on the Columbia River. empleted Swift project, the world's earthfill struc assure PP&L highest Other projects ture with Its quarter-millio- n kilowatts in of another 127,000 kilowatt powerhouse. the next few years. "It is our intention to insure that our customers may always be able to depend on an ade quate power supply," E. Robert de Luccia, PP&L vice president and chief engineer, explains He is one of a line of chief Wish To engineers on whom the responsi- bility for anticipating and meet- ing the customers' power require- ments have rested since 1910. And This department can never rest, Congratulate Pacific Power Light says de Luccia. Pacific Power's outlays for construction in the next 15 years Co. on Their Golden Anniversary! are expected to total $1 billion dollars. Big Project Planned for Pacific Power has applied 5 V two further projects on the Lew- t is River, which could add a total of 202,000 kilowatts to the com- MOTOROLA resources. It also - pany's power hi has proposed to build the Eden 5 Ridge project on the Coquille 4" River in southwestern Oregon. STEREO-- HI ! L nu,,ii tarn tin This would add an initial 77-00- 0 RCA kilowatts. Plans call for even- RADIOS tual construction of an 100,000-kilowa- tt steam generating plant T.V.s using nearby coal deposits. EXTEND CONGRATULATIONS TO Pacific Power is a partner In the Pacific Northwest Power Company, which seeks federal authority to build the eventual UNIVERSAL PACIFIC POWER O LIGHT ON THEIR 1,750,000 kilowatt High Moun- - tain Sheep project on the Snake River. COFFEE MAKERS PP&L currently is adding a FRY PANS 100,000-kilowat- t unit to the Dave Johnston steam-electri- c plant in 100,-00- 0 GRILLS Wyoming, where the first kilowatt unit is Wyoming's TOASTERS largest power supply. den All of these are a far Anniversary projects s cry from the little. Isolated plants PP&L took over in 1910, NEW OR OLD when it began tying local elec- RECORDS tric systems into a dependable 50 YEARS OF FAITHFUL AND PROGRESSIVE SERVICE economic power supply network which could give the customers all the power they could use. Early Plants Improred The best of those little pio- neering plants, such as the GONTY'S Morrow County Grain Growers Association Walla Walla River hydro-electri- c Pendleton andil 143 Main HPPta6f statir.n between ' Waila Wa'.la.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lewis River Hydroelectric Project Relicensing
    United StatesDepartment of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Western Washington Fish and Wildlife Office 510 DesmondDr. SE, Suite 102 Lacey,Washington 98503 In ReplyRefer To: SCANNED 1-3-06-F-0177 sEPI 5 2006 MagalieR. Salas,Secretary F6deralEnergy Regulatory Commission 888First Sffeet,NE WashingtonD.C. 24426 Attention:Ann Ariel Vecchio DearSecretary Salas: This documenttransmits the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's(Service) Biological Opinion on the effectsto bull trout(Salvelinus confluentus),northern spotted owls (Srrlxoccidentalis caurina)and bald eagles(Haliaeetus leucocephalus) fromthe relicensingof the Lewis River HydroeiectricProjects: Merwin (FERC No. 935),Yale (FERC No. 2071),Swift No. 1 (FERC No. Zr 11),and swift No. 2 (FERCNo. 2213). Theaction that comprises this consultationunder theEndangered Species Act of 1973,as amended (16 U.S.C. l53I et seq.)is therelicensing of the Lewis-RiverHydroelectric Projects by the FederalEnergy Regulatory Commission and the interdependentactions contained in the SettlementAgreement (PacifiCorp et aL.2004e),dated November30,2004,and Washington Department of Ecology's401 Certifications. Consultationfor the relicensingof the Lewis River Plojectswas initiated by the Commission's letterto the Servicewhich was received in our officeon October11,2005. Based on our letter datedMarch15,2006,the deadline for completingthis consultationwas extended by mutual agreementuntil May 5, 2006. On June12,2006,with concurrenceby thelicensees,we submittedanother request for an extensionto SeptemberI,2006, to
    [Show full text]
  • Lewis River Hydroelectric Projects FERC Project Nos
    Lewis River Hydroelectric Projects FERC Project Nos. 935, 2071, 2111, 2213 Photo courtesy of Kim McCune, PacifiCorp – June 2018 2018 Annual Report Annual Summary of License Implementation and Compliance: Aquatic and Terrestrial Resources April 12, 2019 Lewis River Hydroelectric Projects FERC Nos. 935, 2071, 2111, 2213 Annual Summary of License Implementation and Compliance: Aquatic and Terrestrial Resources 2018 Annual Report ©2005 PACIFICORP | PAGE 1 Lewis River Hydroelectric Project (FERC Nos. 935, 2071, 2111 & 2213) Annual Report 2018 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 7 1.1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................. 8 1.1.1 Lewis River Settlement Agreement ............................................................................................. 8 1.1.2 Environmental Impact Statement ............................................................................................... 8 1.1.3 Agency Terms and Conditions ................................................................................................... 8 1.1.4 Endangered Species Act Consultations ...................................................................................... 9 1.1.5 Water Quality Certifications .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • You Are D. B. Cooper
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses Winter 4-12-2018 You are D. B. Cooper James Bezerra Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Fiction Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Bezerra, James, "You are D. B. Cooper" (2018). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 4342. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.6235 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. You Are D. B. Cooper by James Bezerra A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Fine Arts in Creative Writing Thesis Committee: Gabriel Urza, Chair Paul Collins Madeline McDonnell Portland State University 2018 2018 James Bezerra Abstract This thesis is a novel about the 1971 skyjacking of a plane out of Portland Airport. The novel is structured in the style of a choose-your-own-adventure book. It investigates the nature and identity of the skyjacker, who is known as D. B. Cooper. i Table of Contents Abstract …………………………………………………………………………… i You Are D. B. Cooper ……………………………………………………………. 1 Terminal Reference Section …...……………………………………………….. 197 ii You Are D. B. Cooper By James Bezerra 1 Look, it is not going to work out between us. Please set this book on fire. 2 I only know a few true things about D. B. Cooper: In 1971 a plane was hijacked after taking off from Portland Airport.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Geology in Washington, Volume I Wuhington Diviaion of Geology and Earth Resoul'ces Bulleti!I 78
    The Cowlitz River Projects 264 ENGINEERING GEOLOGY IN WASHINGTON Aerial view of Mossyrock reservoir (Riffe Lake) and the valley of the Cowlitz River; view to the northeast toward Mount Rainier. Photograph by R. W. Galster, July 1980. Engineering Geology in Wuhington, Volume I . Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Bulletin 78 The Cowlitz River Projects: Mayfield and Mossyrock Dams HOWARD A. COOMBS University of Washington PROJECT DESCRIPTION unit) is at the toe of the dam on the north bank. The reservoir is 23.5 mi long. By impounding more than The Cowlitz River has its origin in the Cowlitz 1,600,000 acre-ft of water in the reservoir, the output of Glacier on the southeastern slope of Mount Rainier. The Mayfield Dam was greatly enhanced (Figures 3 and 4). river flows southward, then turns toward the west and passes through the western margin of the Cascade AREAL GEOLOGY Range in a broad, glaciated basin. It is in this stretch of The southern Cascades of Washington are composed the river that both Mossyrock and Mayfield dams are lo­ essentially of volcanic and sedimentary rocks that have cated. Finally, the Cowlitz River turns southward and been intruded by many dikes and sills and by small enters the Columbia River at Longview. batholiths and stocks of dioritic composition, as well as Mayfield Dam, completed in 1963, is 13 mi down­ plugs of andesite and basalt. Most of these rocks range stream from Mossyrock Dam, constructed 5 yr later. in age from late Eocene to Miocene (Hammond, 1963; Both are approximately 50 mi due south of Tacoma.
    [Show full text]
  • WTS 2 Report
    PacifiCorp / Cowlitz PUD Lewis River Hydroelectric Projects FERC Project Nos. 935, 2071, 2111, 2213 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.2 STREAMFLOW STUDY (WTS 2) .........................................................WTS 2-1 2.2.1 Study Objectives............................................................................WTS 2-1 2.2.2 Study Area .....................................................................................WTS 2-1 2.2.3 Methods .........................................................................................WTS 2-1 2.2.4 Key Questions................................................................................WTS 2-4 2.2.5 Results............................................................................................WTS 2-4 2.2.6 Discussion....................................................................................WTS 2-31 2.2.7 Schedule.......................................................................................WTS 2-36 2.2.8 References....................................................................................WTS 2-40 2.2.9 Comments and Responses on Draft Report .................................WTS 2-41 WTS 2 Appendix 1 Monthly Flow Duration Curves LIST OF TABLES Table 2.2-1. Selected stream gages on the Lewis River. .......................................WTS 2-7 Table 2.2-2. Peak flow frequencies......................................................................WTS 2-28 Table 2.2-3. Summary of streamflow statistics for Lewis River stream gages. ..WTS 2-34 LIST OF FIGURES Figure
    [Show full text]
  • Swift No. 1 Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No. P-2111
    Swift No. 1 Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No. P-2111 Before the United States of America Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Application for License Amendment Volume I of V Initial Statement and Exhibits A, C, D and G January 2020 Swift No. 1 Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. P-2111) Review Draft – January 2020 This page intentionally left blank. This document is considered Public Information. Volume I – Page 2 Swift No. 1 Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. P-2111) Review Draft – January 2020 Swift No. 1 Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. P-2111) APPLICATION FOR LICENSE AMENDMENT This application for license amendment for the Swift No. 1 Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. P- 2111) consists of the following volumes: Volume I Initial Statement Exhibit A – Project Description Exhibit C – Project Installation and Proposed Schedule Exhibit D – Costs and Financing Exhibit G – Project Maps Volume II Exhibit E – Environmental Report Volume III Appendices to Exhibit E Volume IV Exhibit F – Vicinity and Preliminary Design Drawings (CEII Not for Public Release) Volume V CONFIDENTIAL – Cultural Resource Summary for the Merwin, Yale and Swift No. 1 Projects This document is considered Public Information. Volume I – Page 3 Swift No. 1 Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. P-2111) Review Draft – January 2020 This page intentionally left blank. This document is considered Public Information. Volume I – Page 4 Swift No. 1 Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. P-2111) Review Draft – January 2020 Initial Statement Swift No. 1 Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. P-2111) This document is considered Public Information. Volume I – Page 5 Swift No. 1 Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. P-2111) Review Draft – January 2020 This page intentionally left blank.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia River Cold Water Refuges Plan
    EPA-910-R-21-001 January 2021 Columbia River Cold Water Refuges Plan Prepared by: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 www.epa.gov Columbia River Cold Water Refuges Plan Final January 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................ XII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 3 Regulatory Background ............................................................................................. 3 Types of Cold Water Refuges .................................................................................... 4 Overview of Columbia River Cold Water Refuges Plan .............................................. 5 2 COLD WATER REFUGES IN THE LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER .............................. 7 Columbia River Temperatures ................................................................................... 7 Tributary Temperatures Compared to Columbia River Temperatures ...................... 10 Tributaries Providing Cold Water Refuge ................................................................. 13 Twelve Primary Cold Water Refuges ....................................................................... 18 3 SALMON AND STEELHEAD USE OF COLD WATER REFUGES ......................... 34 Salmon
    [Show full text]
  • Lewis River Water Quality Management Plan, July
    Lewis River Hydroelectric Projects FERC Project Nos. 935, 2071, 2111 Water Quality Management Plan Prepared by July 2013 Lewis River Hydroelectric Project (FERC Nos. 935, 2071, 2111 & 2213) Water Quality Management Plan ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 6 1.1 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................... 6 1.1.1 Project Area ...................................................................................... 6 1.1.2 Discussion of Applicable Water Quality Standards ............................................. 7 1.1.3 Water Temperature ............................................................................... 7 1.1.4 Total Dissolved Gas .............................................................................. 9 1.1.5 Turbine Related TDG ............................................................................ 9 1.1.6 Spill Related TDG ................................................................................ 9 1.1.7 Dissolved Oxygen ............................................................................... 11 1.1.8 pH ................................................................................................ 11 1.1.9 Turbidity ......................................................................................... 12 1.1.10 Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures
    [Show full text]
  • The Federal Columbia River Power System: Inside Story
    THE COLUMBIA RIVER SYSTEM INSIDE STORY THE COLUMBIA RIVER SYSTEM INSIDE STORY SECOND EDITION FEDERAL COLUMBIA RIVER POWER SYSTEM BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Published April 2001 This publication is an updated version of the original prepared for the System Operation Review, a joint project of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and Bonneville Power Administration. Photo Credits: U.S. Bureau of Reclamation U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Bonneville Power Administration Northwest Power Planning Council Philip W. Thor Robin Cody If you have comments or questions, please contact: Bonneville Power Administration U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, NWD U.S. Bureau of Reclamation 1-503-230-3000 1-503-808-3710 1-208-378-5021 P.O. Box 3621 P.O. Box 2870 1150 N. Curtis Road, Suite 100 Portland, Oregon 97208-3621 Portland, Oregon 97208-2870 Boise, Idaho 83706-1234 Printed on recycled paper TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction . 2 II. The Columbia River System . 4 A. The Basin . 4 B. Uses of the River System . 6 C. The Dams and Water Projects . 9 D. The Coordinated Columbia River System . 16 III. The Agencies and the Operating Agreements . 18 A. The Forecasters . 18 B. Project Owner/ Operators & Affiliated Agencies. 18 C. The NMFS Regional Implementation Forum. 20 D. The Operating Agreements and Guidelines. 21 IV. System Operation – The Big Picture . 26 A. Hydrology of the Basin . 26 B. The Drivers of System Operations . 27 C. Overview of System Operations . 27 V. Multiple Uses of the System .
    [Show full text]
  • Lewis River Bull Trout: a Synthesis of Known Information
    Lewis River Bull Trout: A Synthesis of Known Information J. Michael Hudson1, Jeremiah Doyle2, Jamie Lamperth3, Robert Al-Chokhachy4, Greg Robertson5, Tom Wadsworth3 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Columbia River Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office 2 PacifiCorp 3 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 4 U.S. Geological Survey, Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center 5 U.S. Forest Service, Gifford-Pinchot National Forest April 4, 2019 1 [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 2 Table of Contents I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 8 II. Study Area ........................................................................................................................................ 8 a. Subbasin Description ......................................................................................................... 8 b. Bull trout populations and life-history types present in the Lewis River subbasin ......... 10 c. Habitat ............................................................................................................................. 10 i. Stream Temperature .................................................................................................................... 10 ii. In-stream Habitat ........................................................................................................................ 11 d. Fishery management .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use Study (Lnd 1)
    PacifiCorp / Cowlitz PUD Lewis River Hydroelectric Projects FERC Project Nos. 935, 2071, 2111, 2213 TABLE OF CONTENTS 8.0 Land Use ..........................................................................................................LND 1-1 8.1 LAND USE STUDY (LND 1) .................................................................LND 1-1 8.1.1 Study Objectives............................................................................LND 1-1 8.1.2 Study Area .....................................................................................LND 1-1 8.1.3 Methods .........................................................................................LND 1-1 8.1.4 Key Questions................................................................................LND 1-2 8.1.5 Results............................................................................................LND 1-2 8.1.6 Schedule.......................................................................................LND 1-45 8.1.7 References....................................................................................LND 1-45 8.1.8 Comments and Responses on Draft Report .................................LND 1-47 LIST OF TABLES NONE LIST OF FIGURES Figure 8.1-1. Major Property Owners....................................................................LND 1-3 Figure 8.1-2. Land Management Designations....................................................LND 1-11 Figure 8.1-3 Land Use in Project Area. ...............................................................LND 1-19 April
    [Show full text]
  • Volume II, Chapter 12 Lewis River Subbasin—Upper North Fork
    Volume II, Chapter 12 Lewis River Subbasin—Upper North Fork TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................................................... 12-2 12.0 LEWIS RIVER SUBBASIN—UPPER NORTH FORK .......................................... 12-1 12.1 Subbasin Description............................................................................................. 12-1 12.1.1 Topography & Geology .................................................................................. 12-1 12.1.2 Climate............................................................................................................ 12-1 12.1.3 Land Use/Land Cover..................................................................................... 12-1 12.2 Focal Fish Species ................................................................................................. 12-4 12.2.1 Spring Chinook—Lewis Subbasin .................................................................. 12-4 12.2.2 Coho—Lewis Subbasin (North Fork) ............................................................. 12-7 12.2.3 Winter Steelhead—Lewis Subbasin (North Fork) ........................................ 12-10 12.2.4 Bull Trout—Lewis River Subbasin ............................................................... 12-13 12.2.5 Cutthroat Trout—Lewis River Subbasin....................................................... 12-15 12.3 Potentially Manageable Impacts.........................................................................
    [Show full text]