Await in Deep-Pelagic Habitats the Remarkable Squidworm Is An
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
In Worms Geoff Read NIWA New Zealand
Brussels, 28-30 September Polychaeta (Annelida) in WoRMS Geoff Read NIWA New Zealand www.marinespecies.org/polychaeta/index.php Context interface Swimming — an unexpected skill of Polychaeta Acrocirridae Alciopidae Syllidae Nereididae Teuthidodr ilus = squidworm Acrocirridae Polynoidae Swima bombiviridis Syllidae Total WoRMS Polychaeta records, excluding fossils 91 valid families. Entries >98% editor checked, except Echiura (69%) Group in WoRMS all taxa all species valid species names names names Class Polychaeta 23,872 20,135 11,615 Subclass Echiura 296 234 197 Echiura were recently a Subclass Errantia 12,686 10,849 6,210 separate phylum Subclass Polychaeta incertae sedis 354 265 199 Subclass Sedentaria 10,528 8,787 5,009 Non-marine Polychaeta 28 16 (3 terrestrial) Class Clitellata* 1601 1086 (279 Hirudinea) *Total valid non-leech clitellates~5000 spp, 1700 aquatic. (Martin et al. 2008) Annelida diversity "It is now clear that annelids, in addition to including a large number of species, encompass a much greater disparity of body plans than previously anticipated, including animals that are segmented and unsegmented, with and without parapodia, with and without chaetae, coelomate and acoelomate, with straight guts and with U-shaped digestive tracts, from microscopic to gigantic." (Andrade et al. 2015) Andrade et al (2015) “Articulating “archiannelids”: Phylogenomics and annelid relationships, with emphasis on meiofaunal taxa.” Molecular Biology and Evolution, efirst Myzostomida (images Summers et al)EV Nautilus: Riftia Semenov: Terebellidae Annelida latest phylogeny “… it is now well accepted that Annelida includes many taxa formerly considered different phyla or with supposed affiliations with other animal groups, such as Sipuncula, Echiura, Pogonophora and Vestimentifera, Myzostomida, or Diurodrilida (Struck et al. -
Polychaete Worms Definitions and Keys to the Orders, Families and Genera
THE POLYCHAETE WORMS DEFINITIONS AND KEYS TO THE ORDERS, FAMILIES AND GENERA THE POLYCHAETE WORMS Definitions and Keys to the Orders, Families and Genera By Kristian Fauchald NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY In Conjunction With THE ALLAN HANCOCK FOUNDATION UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Science Series 28 February 3, 1977 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ix INTRODUCTION 1 CHARACTERS USED TO DEFINE HIGHER TAXA 2 CLASSIFICATION OF POLYCHAETES 7 ORDERS OF POLYCHAETES 9 KEY TO FAMILIES 9 ORDER ORBINIIDA 14 ORDER CTENODRILIDA 19 ORDER PSAMMODRILIDA 20 ORDER COSSURIDA 21 ORDER SPIONIDA 21 ORDER CAPITELLIDA 31 ORDER OPHELIIDA 41 ORDER PHYLLODOCIDA 45 ORDER AMPHINOMIDA 100 ORDER SPINTHERIDA 103 ORDER EUNICIDA 104 ORDER STERNASPIDA 114 ORDER OWENIIDA 114 ORDER FLABELLIGERIDA 115 ORDER FAUVELIOPSIDA 117 ORDER TEREBELLIDA 118 ORDER SABELLIDA 135 FIVE "ARCHIANNELIDAN" FAMILIES 152 GLOSSARY 156 LITERATURE CITED 161 INDEX 180 Preface THE STUDY of polychaetes used to be a leisurely I apologize to my fellow polychaete workers for occupation, practised calmly and slowly, and introducing a complex superstructure in a group which the presence of these worms hardly ever pene- so far has been remarkably innocent of such frills. A trated the consciousness of any but the small group great number of very sound partial schemes have been of invertebrate zoologists and phylogenetlcists inter- suggested from time to time. These have been only ested in annulated creatures. This is hardly the case partially considered. The discussion is complex enough any longer. without the inclusion of speculations as to how each Studies of marine benthos have demonstrated that author would have completed his or her scheme, pro- these animals may be wholly dominant both in num- vided that he or she had had the evidence and inclina- bers of species and in numbers of specimens. -
Molecular Phylogeny of Odontosyllis (Annelida, Syllidae): a Recent and Rapid Radiation of Marine Bioluminescent Worms
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/241570; this version posted January 8, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Molecular phylogeny of Odontosyllis (Annelida, Syllidae): A recent and rapid radiation of marine bioluminescent worms. AIDA VERDES1,2,3,4, PATRICIA ALVAREZ-CAMPOS5, ARNE NYGREN6, GUILLERMO SAN MARTIN3, GREG ROUSE7, DIMITRI D. DEHEYN7, DAVID F. GRUBER2,4,8, MANDE HOLFORD1,2,4 1 Department of Chemistry, Hunter College Belfer Research Center, The City University of New York. 2 The Graduate Center, Program in Biology, Chemistry and Biochemistry, The City University of New York. 3 Departamento de Biología (Zoología), Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. 4 Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural History. 5 Stem Cells, Development and Evolution, Institute Jacques Monod. 6 Department of Systematics and Biodiversity, University of Gothenburg. 7 Marine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego. 8 Department of Natural Sciences, Weissman School of Arts and Sciences, Baruch College, The City University of New York Abstract Marine worms of the genus Odontosyllis (Syllidae, Annelida) are well known for their spectacular bioluminescent courtship rituals. During the reproductive period, the benthic marine worms leave the ocean floor and swim to the surface to spawn, using bioluminescent light for mate attraction. The behavioral aspects of the courtship ritual have been extensively investigated, but little is known about the origin and evolution of light production in Odontosyllis, which might in fact be a key factor shaping the natural history of the group, as bioluminescent courtship might promote speciation. -
An Annotated Checklist of the Marine Macroinvertebrates of Alaska David T
NOAA Professional Paper NMFS 19 An annotated checklist of the marine macroinvertebrates of Alaska David T. Drumm • Katherine P. Maslenikov Robert Van Syoc • James W. Orr • Robert R. Lauth Duane E. Stevenson • Theodore W. Pietsch November 2016 U.S. Department of Commerce NOAA Professional Penny Pritzker Secretary of Commerce National Oceanic Papers NMFS and Atmospheric Administration Kathryn D. Sullivan Scientific Editor* Administrator Richard Langton National Marine National Marine Fisheries Service Fisheries Service Northeast Fisheries Science Center Maine Field Station Eileen Sobeck 17 Godfrey Drive, Suite 1 Assistant Administrator Orono, Maine 04473 for Fisheries Associate Editor Kathryn Dennis National Marine Fisheries Service Office of Science and Technology Economics and Social Analysis Division 1845 Wasp Blvd., Bldg. 178 Honolulu, Hawaii 96818 Managing Editor Shelley Arenas National Marine Fisheries Service Scientific Publications Office 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle, Washington 98115 Editorial Committee Ann C. Matarese National Marine Fisheries Service James W. Orr National Marine Fisheries Service The NOAA Professional Paper NMFS (ISSN 1931-4590) series is pub- lished by the Scientific Publications Of- *Bruce Mundy (PIFSC) was Scientific Editor during the fice, National Marine Fisheries Service, scientific editing and preparation of this report. NOAA, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115. The Secretary of Commerce has The NOAA Professional Paper NMFS series carries peer-reviewed, lengthy original determined that the publication of research reports, taxonomic keys, species synopses, flora and fauna studies, and data- this series is necessary in the transac- intensive reports on investigations in fishery science, engineering, and economics. tion of the public business required by law of this Department. -
Polychaeta Lana Crumrine
Polychaeta Lana Crumrine Well over 200 species of the class Polychaeta are found in waters off the shores of the Pacific Northwest. Larval descriptions are not available for the majority of these species, though descriptions are available of the larvae for at least some species from most families. This chapter provides a dichotomous key to the polychaete larvae to the family level for those families with known or suspected pelagic larva. Descriptions have be $in gleaned from the literature from sites worldwide, and the keys are based on the assumption that developmental patterns are similar in different geographical locations. This is a large assumption; there are cases in which development varies with geography (e.g., Levin, 1984). Identifying polychaetes at the trochophore stage can be difficult, and culturing larvae to advanced stages is advised by several experts in the field (Bhaud and Cazaux, 1987; Plate and Husemann, 1994). Reproduction, Development, and Morphology Within the polychaetes, the patterns of reproduction and larval development are quite variable. Sexes are separate in most species, though hermaphroditism is not uncommon. Some groups undergo a process called epitoky at sexual maturation; benthic adults develop swimming structures, internal organs degenerate, and mating occurs between adults swimming in the water column. Descriptions of reproductive pattern, gamete formation, and spawning can be found in Strathmann (1987). Larval polychaetes generally develop through three stages: the trochophore, metatrochophore, and nectochaete stages. Trochophores are ciliated larvae (see Fig. 1).A band of cilia, the prototroch, is used for locomotion and sometimes feeding. Trochophore larvae are generally broad anteriorly and taper posteriorly. -
STATE of BIODIVERSITY in the MEDITERRANEAN (2-3 P
UNEP(DEC)/MED WG.231/18 17 April 2003 ENGLISH MEDITERRANEAN ACTION PLAN Meeting of the MED POL National Coordinators Sangemini, Italy, 27 - 30 May 2003 STRATEGIC ACTION PROGRAMME GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT OF ECOLOGICAL STATUS AND STRESS REDUCTION INDICATORS FOR THE MEDITERRANEAN REGION In cooperation with UNEP Athens, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1 2. AIMS OF THE REPORT .............................................................................................. 2 3. STATE OF BIODIVERSITY IN THE MEDITERRANEAN............................................. 2 Species Diversity................................................................................................................. 2 Ecosystems/Communities .................................................................................................. 3 Pelagic ............................................................................................................................... 3 Benthic ............................................................................................................................... 4 4. ECOSYSTEM CHANGES DUE TO ANTHROPOGENIC IMPACT............................... 6 Microbial contamination...................................................................................................... 6 Industrial pollution .............................................................................................................. 6 Oil -
Elizabeth Borda
ELIZABETH BORDA Department of Marine Biology, Texas A&M University at Galveston 200 Seawolf Parkway, Ocean and Coastal Studies Building, Galveston, TX 77553 Cell: 917-865-2496 Phone: 409-740-4542 Email: [email protected] https://sites.google.com/site/lizborda/ EDUCATION 2007 Ph.D., Biology City University of New York Graduate School and University Center (CUNY) 2007 1998 B.S., Biology State University of New York at Stony Brook 1998 APPOINTMENTS 2017 – Present Chair of Undergraduate Research Learning Commons, Texas A&M University Galveston Campus (TAMUG) 2015 – Present Lecturer Department of Marine Biology, Texas A&M University Galveston Campus 2008 – Present Research Associate Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History 2011 – 2015 Postdoctoral Research Associate Department of Marine Biology, Texas A&M University Galveston Campus 2010 – 2011 Encyclopedia of Life Rubenstein Fellow Marine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography (UCSD) 2007 – 2010 National Science Foundation (NSF) Minority Postdoctoral Research Fellow Marine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography (UCSD) Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University 2002 – 2007 NSF Partnerships for Enhancing Expertise in Taxonomy Graduate Student Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History 2000 – 2002 Scientific Assistant Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History AWARDS AND HONORS 2016 – Present [coPI] Research Experiences for Undergraduates – Ocean and Coastal $390,259 Research Experiences for Undergraduates (OCEANUS). National Science Foundation [PI: Patrick Louchouarn] 2015 – Present Aggies Commit to Excellence Scholarship (ACES). Texas A&M University $90,000 Galveston Campus – Provost Office [$30,000 per academic year] 2015 – Present Texas A&M University System Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority $84,000 Participation (TAMUS LSAMP) – College Partner funding for Galveston Campus [~$26,000 per academic year] 2016 – 2017 [coPI] Student Incentive Payment Program Marketing Strategy. -
A New Southern Record of the Holopelagic Annelid Poeobius Meseres Heath, 1930 (Flabelligeridae)
Biodiversity Data Journal 8: e58655 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.8.e58655 Single Taxon Treatment A new southern record of the holopelagic annelid Poeobius meseres Heath, 1930 (Flabelligeridae) Charlotte A. Seid‡, Dhugal J. Lindsay§‡, Greg W. Rouse ‡ Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America § Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokosuka, Japan Corresponding author: Charlotte A. Seid ([email protected]), Greg W. Rouse ([email protected]) Academic editor: Christos Arvanitidis Received: 14 Sep 2020 | Accepted: 25 Nov 2020 | Published: 30 Nov 2020 Citation: Seid CA, Lindsay DJ, Rouse GW (2020) A new southern record of the holopelagic annelid Poeobius meseres Heath, 1930 (Flabelligeridae). Biodiversity Data Journal 8: e58655. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e58655 Abstract Background The unusual holopelagic annelid Poeobius meseres Heath, 1930 (Flabelligeridae) was first collected from Monterey Bay, California and has been subsequently recorded across the northern Pacific from Japan to the Gulf of California. Rare occurrences in the eastern tropical Pacific have extended as far as 7° S off Peru. New information Using molecular phylogenetic analysis of a newly-collected specimen from the Salas y Gómez Ridge off Chile, we extend the known geographic range of P. meseres southwards by 2040 km. This subtropical specimen showed higher genetic similarity to a specimen from the type locality (< 1.5% pairwise COI distance) than to representatives from the Aleutian Islands and Japan (5-6%), establishing the first genetically-confirmed occurrence of this species in the Southern Hemisphere. The latitudinal range of P. meseres encompasses the sole collection locality, off Ecuador, of Enigma terwielii Betrem, 1925, a pelagic annelid which has been compared to P. -
Redalyc.First New Dodecaceria (Polychaeta: Cirratulidae) Species
Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía ISSN: 0717-3326 [email protected] Universidad de Valparaíso Chile Elias, Rodolfo; Rivero, María S. First new Dodecaceria (Polychaeta: Cirratulidae) species from the SW Atlantic (38ºS - 57ºW, Argentina) Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía, vol. 44, núm. 1, abril, 2009, pp. 131-136 Universidad de Valparaíso Viña del Mar, Chile Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=47911450012 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía 44(1): 131-136, abril de 2009 First new Dodecaceria (Polychaeta: Cirratulidae) species from the SW Atlantic (38ºS - 57ºW, Argentina) Primera especie nueva de Dodecaceria (Polychaeta: Cirratulidae) para el Atlántico SO (38ºS - 57ºW, Argentina) Rodolfo Elias1 and María S. Rivero1 1Laboratorio de Bioindicadores Bentónicos. Departamento de Ciencias Marinas,Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Deán Funes 3350. B 7602 – AYL. Mar del Plata, Argentina [email protected] Resumen.- Los cirratúlidos son un grupo difícil debido a Abstract.- Cirratulids are a difficult group because they have que tienen pocos caracteres taxonómicos y estos están a few taxonomic characters and these are often misinterpreted. frecuentemente mal interpretados. El género Dodecaceria ha The genus Dodecaceria, in particular has been reviewed in sido revisado en muchas partes del mundo, pero no en las costas several parts of the world but not in the southwestern Atlantic del Atlántico sudoccidental. Los estudios bentónicos de áreas shore. -
Segmented Worms (Phylum Annelida): a Celebration of Twenty Years of Progress Through Zootaxa and Call for Action on the Taxonomic Work That Remains
Zootaxa 4979 (1): 190–211 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Review ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4979.1.18 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8CEAB39F-92C2-485C-86F3-C86A25763450 Segmented worms (Phylum Annelida): a celebration of twenty years of progress through Zootaxa and call for action on the taxonomic work that remains WAGNER F. MAGALHÃES1, PAT HUTCHINGS2,3, ALEJANDRO OCEGUERA-FIGUEROA4, PATRICK MARTIN5, RÜDIGER M. SCHMELZ6, MARK J. WETZEL7, HELENA WIKLUND8, NANCY J. MACIOLEK9, GISELE Y. KAWAUCHI10 & JASON D. WILLIAMS11 1Institute of Biology, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, 40170-115, Bahia, Brazil. �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9285-4008 2Australian Museum Research Institute, Australian Museum, Sydney, NSW. Australia. �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7521-3930 3Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2019, Australia. 4Departamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Tercer circuito s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510, Mexico City, Mexico. �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5514-9748 5Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Taxonomy and Phylogeny, 29 rue Vautier, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium. �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6033-8412 6IfAB Institute for Applied Soil Biology, Hamburg, Germany. �[email protected] 7Illinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Forbes Natural History Building, MC-652, 1816 S. Oak Street, Champaign, Illinois 61820 USA. �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4247-0954 8Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. -
Benthic Invertebrate Species Richness & Diversity At
BBEENNTTHHIICC INVVEERTTEEBBRRAATTEE SPPEECCIIEESSRRIICCHHNNEESSSS && DDIIVVEERRSSIITTYYAATT DIIFFFFEERRENNTTHHAABBIITTAATTSS IINN TTHHEEGGRREEAATEERR CCHHAARRLLOOTTTTEE HAARRBBOORRSSYYSSTTEEMM Charlotte Harbor National Estuary Program 1926 Victoria Avenue Fort Myers, Florida 33901 March 2007 Mote Marine Laboratory Technical Report No. 1169 The Charlotte Harbor National Estuary Program is a partnership of citizens, elected officials, resource managers and commercial and recreational resource users working to improve the water quality and ecological integrity of the greater Charlotte Harbor watershed. A cooperative decision-making process is used within the program to address diverse resource management concerns in the 4,400 square mile study area. Many of these partners also financially support the Program, which, in turn, affords the Program opportunities to fund projects such as this. The entities that have financially supported the program include the following: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Southwest Florida Water Management District South Florida Water Management District Florida Department of Environmental Protection Florida Coastal Zone Management Program Peace River/Manasota Regional Water Supply Authority Polk, Sarasota, Manatee, Lee, Charlotte, DeSoto and Hardee Counties Cities of Sanibel, Cape Coral, Fort Myers, Punta Gorda, North Port, Venice and Fort Myers Beach and the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This document was prepared with support from the Charlotte Harbor National Estuary Program with supplemental support from Mote Marine Laboratory. The project was conducted through the Benthic Ecology Program of Mote's Center for Coastal Ecology. Mote staff project participants included: Principal Investigator James K. Culter; Field Biologists and Invertebrate Taxonomists, Jay R. Leverone, Debi Ingrao, Anamari Boyes, Bernadette Hohmann and Lucas Jennings; Data Management, Jay Sprinkel and Janet Gannon; Sediment Analysis, Jon Perry and Ari Nissanka. -
View of the Discovery Progress of Polychaete Worms (Annelida) Has Never Been Done
Pamungkas et al. Helgol Mar Res (2019) 73:4 https://doi.org/10.1186/s10152-019-0524-z Helgoland Marine Research ORIGINAL ARTICLE Open Access Progress and perspectives in the discovery of polychaete worms (Annelida) of the world Joko Pamungkas1,2*, Christopher J. Glasby3, Geofrey B. Read4 , Simon P. Wilson5 and Mark J. Costello1 Abstract Despite the availability of well-documented data, a comprehensive review of the discovery progress of polychaete worms (Annelida) has never been done. In the present study, we reviewed available data in the World Register of Marine Species, and found that 11,456 valid species of Recent polychaetes (1417 genera, 85 families) have been named by 835 frst authors since 1758. Over this period, three discovery phases of the fauna were identifed. That is, the initial phase (from 1758 to mid-nineteenth century) where nearly 500 species were described by few taxonomists, the second phase (from the 1850’s to mid-twentieth century) where almost 5000 species were largely described by some very productive taxonomists, and the third phase (from the 1950’s to modern times) in which about 6000 species were described by the most taxonomists ever. Six polychaete families with the most species were Syllidae (993 species), Polynoidae (876 species), Nereididae (687 species), Spionidae (612 species), Terebellidae (607 species) and Serpulidae (576 species). The increase in the number of frst authors through time indicated greater taxonomic efort. By contrast, there was a decline in the number of polychaete species described in proportion to the number of frst authors since around mid-nineteenth century. This suggested that it has been getting more difcult to fnd new polychaete species.