DOCSLIB.ORG

Grey Seal Teeth As Indicators of Climate Variability. ICES CM 2004

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Grey Seal Teeth As Indicators of Climate Variability. ICES CM 2004 ICES CM 2004/K:27 Not to be cited without prior reference to the author Grey Seal teeth as Indicators of Climate Variability By M.O. Hammill Institute Maurice Lamontagne, Box 1000, Mont-Joli, QC. G5H 3Z4 Tel: +418-775-0580 Fax: +418-775-0740 Email: [email protected] Abstract The impacts of environmental changes on life history parameters of marine mammals are poorly understood. This may be due to the large spatial scales that must be examined to describe environmental changes and their impacts on biological aspects of most species. Annual growth layers in the teeth of marine mammals have long been used to determine age of individual animals. In some species, changes in tooth structure also provide a record of life-history changes such as age at sexual maturity, or records of major climatic events eg El Nino. In this study, growth layer development in longitudinal sections (N=400) of Northwest Atlantic grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) canine teeth were examined. Age, sex, and a large scale environmental variable, Minimum Cold Intermediate Layer Temperature (MCILT) all had a significant effect (p<0.05) on the thickness of the first Growth Layer Group (GLG1), while only sex had a significant effect on the thickness of GLG2. GLG1 of males was thicker than that of females. In both sexes, GLG1 thickness declined with age. GLG1 thickness was standardized to remove the effects of age and sex and the resulting deviations were compared to changes in MCILT. During the time series (1965-1998), standardized GLG1 thickness was positively correlated with changes in MCILT (p<0.05). Correlations were also observed between fish stock biomass and MCILT. Grey seal pups begin entering the water during February-March at which time they must also learn to feed. Changes in GLG1 thickness likely reflect the foraging success of pups during their first year of nutritional independence. Although MCILT is only one measure of environmental conditions, changes in this factor have important ecosystem effects that can also be detected at higher trophic levels. 2 Introduction Understanding the importance of environmental variability and its linkages to changes in ecosystem properties is complicated by the differing, but often coupled time and spatial scales involved. Spatial changes may affect overall resource abundance, while temporal changes will affect the timing of resource availability with respect to the needs of the consumer. In fisheries biology, the match-mismatch hypothesis links survival of fish larvae to their ability to encounter and eat sufficient plankton prey to avoid starvation. Differences in the match between the timing of prey abundance and fish larvae can lead to significant interannual variations in fish recruitment (Brander et al. 2001). Factors such as temperature, precipitation and windstress are only a few of a suite of key environmental variables having an impact on population processes of both marine (Basson 1999;Brander, K.M. et al. 2001; O’Brien et al. 2000; Planque and Frédou 1999; Carscadden et al. 2000) as well as terrestrial ecosystems which may ultimately fall under the control of large scale global climate processes (Post and Stenseth 1999; Post et al. 1999). One such well known phenomenon is the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO), which is normally associated with the southern hemisphere, but has significant effects on both terrestrial and marine ecoystems around the world (Holmgren et al. 2001; Hofman and Powel 1998). Another is the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), which has been associated with far-reaching ecosystem effects. Recent studies have identified links between NAO index variability and large herbivore populations (Milner et al. 1999; Post and Stenseth 1999), large mammalian predators (Post et al. 1999), marine fish and zooplankton (O’Brien et al. 2000; Planque and Taylor 1998) and higher trophic level seabirds (Thompson and Ollason 2001), but have not as yet identified potential links with top trophic level marine mammal predators. 3 Annual growth layers in pinniped teeth are commonly used to determine age of individual animals (Laws 1962; Mansfield 1991; Bernt et al. 1996). In some species, these layers can be linked to annual events in the life cycle of individuals such as the moult, parturition, fasting and lactation (Bengston 1988; Mansfield 1991; Boyd and Roberts 1993). Changes in tooth growth patterns have been associated with large scale climatic changes in the Southern Ocean (Boyd and Roberts 1993), but such large scale environmental effects have not been reported in North Atlantic pinnipeds. Here I examine the hypothesis that the pattern of growth layer deposition in the canine teeth of grey (Halichoerus grypus) seals in the Gulf of St Lawrence during the first year are linked to environmental changes as represented by a large scale oceanographic environmental variable, the Cold Intermediate Layer (CIL) Index. Materials and Methods The Gulf of St. Lawrence (Gulf) is a highly stratified semi-enclosed sea in eastern Canada (Fig. 1). It is characterized by the deep (300-400 m) Laurentian Channel, which traverses the Gulf from Cabot Strait to Honguedo Strait. A second deep channel (100-200 m) extends to the north of Anticosti Island through Jacques Cartier Strait. The area to the south of the Laurentian Channel is quite shallow (< 75 m). The area is ice-covered for 5 months of the year but the extent is highly variable between years (Markham 1980). The Cold Intermediate Layer is a layer of cool water sandwiched between a warm surface layer, formed by the sun’s warming of the upper portions of the water column in spring, and a deep warmer, but more saline and hence denser layer of water. This three layered structure is replaced in winter by a two layered structure as fall and winter storms lead to significant mixing 4 of the surface and intermediate layers (Fig. 2)(Gilbert and Pettigrew 1997). It is not clear what factors affect the volume and minimum temperature attained by the CIL during winter. A significant negative correlation has been observed between the NAO index and the CIL core temperature, but is not as strong as expected (r=-0.28), suggesting that other local factors also play a part in its formation and intensity (Gilbert and Pettigrew 1997). Samples used in this study were obtained from animals that had been hunted between 1970 and 2000 for scientific reasons. Canine teeth (N=400) were extracted from the lower jaw and sectioned longitudinally (≈150 µm thick) (Mansfield 1991). The ages of individual animals were determined at the time of collection and these ages were used to obtain a selection of animals born between 1965 and 1998. The teeth were read in transmitted light under a dissecting microscope using a polarizing filter to improve contrast. Age was determined by counting Growth Layer Groups (GLG) and compared to the stated age to check for errors and to ensure consistency in identification of the GLG in the cementum (Fig. 3). The thickness of the first (GLG1) and second (GLG2) growth layer groups, total dentine and total cementum thicknesses were measured using an ocular micrometer. For comparisons across years, variables were standardized using : (x ij –x mean ij )/sij, where th x is the measurement for the sex and age group and xmean is the mean for the ij group and s is the standard error for the ijth group. Results Among grey seals differences in the thickness of the first and the second growth layer group were observed between readers, sex and with age (ANCOVA: p<0.0001). Generally the first GLG was thicker in males than among females (Fig. 4). Among older animals, there was a 5 marked reduction in the thickness of the first GLG between age 1 and age 2. For the dentine and cementum, no reader effect was observed, but differences in thickness were observed between sexes and with age (ANCOVA : dentine-reader interaction p=0.39; dentine-age interaction p=0.0001; dentine-sex interaction, p=0.0001. ANCOVA : cementum- reader interaction p=0.858; cementum-age interaction p=0.0001; cementum-sex interaction, p=0.0004). The thickness of the dentine was not related to sex, but did increase with total body length, an index of body size (ANCOVA: dentine-sex interaction p=0.07; dentine-length interaction p<0.001). Cementum thickness was related to sex and to total length (ANCOVA: cementum-sex interaction p=0.02; cementum-length interaction p<0.001). The normalized value of GLG1 was correlated with the minimum temperature (Tmin ) of the CIL when the animal was born (r=0.4, p<0.05), correlated with Tmin of the CIL one year prior to its birth (r=0.4, p<0.05) and negatively correlated to the thickness of the CIL layer one year prior to its birth (r= -0.4, p<0.05)(Fig. 5). A stronger correlation was observed between the normalized values of cementum thickness and the climate variables Tmin two years prior to birth (r=0.6 , p<0.05) and the CIL thickness one and two years prior to the birth of the animal (r=-0.5, p<0.05). The normalized value of length was also correlated with Tmin of the CIL during the year of the animal’s birth (r=0.53, p=0.005). No significant relationship was observed between the climate variables and GLG2 or thickness of the dentine layer. Discussion Seals (Order Pinnipedia, Families Phocidae, Otariidae and Odobenidae) comprise a group of K-selected species characterized by long life-spans, late maturity and low reproductive rates (Stearns 1976). In many ecosystems they are apex predators that integrate environmental conditions over broad temporal (decades) and spatial (100s of kilometres) scales. These suites of 6 characteristics complicate attempts to evaluate links to environmental variability, because significant population effects are only observed under the most extreme conditions (eg lack of ice leading to significant changes in juvenile survival.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 56. Otariidae and Phocidae
    FAUNA of AUSTRALIA 56. OTARIIDAE AND PHOCIDAE JUDITH E. KING 1 Australian Sea-lion–Neophoca cinerea [G. Ross] Southern Elephant Seal–Mirounga leonina [G. Ross] Ross Seal, with pup–Ommatophoca rossii [J. Libke] Australian Sea-lion–Neophoca cinerea [G. Ross] Weddell Seal–Leptonychotes weddellii [P. Shaughnessy] New Zealand Fur-seal–Arctocephalus forsteri [G. Ross] Crab-eater Seal–Lobodon carcinophagus [P. Shaughnessy] 56. OTARIIDAE AND PHOCIDAE DEFINITION AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION Pinnipeds are aquatic carnivores. They differ from other mammals in their streamlined shape, reduction of pinnae and adaptation of both fore and hind feet to form flippers. In the skull, the orbits are enlarged, the lacrimal bones are absent or indistinct and there are never more than three upper and two lower incisors. The cheek teeth are nearly homodont and some conditions of the ear that are very distinctive (Repenning 1972). Both superfamilies of pinnipeds, Phocoidea and Otarioidea, are represented in Australian waters by a number of species (Table 56.1). The various superfamilies and families may be distinguished by important and/or easily observed characters (Table 56.2). King (1983b) provided more detailed lists and references. These and other differences between the above two groups are not regarded as being of great significance, especially as an undoubted fur seal (Australian Fur-seal Arctocephalus pusillus) is as big as some of the sea lions and has some characters of the skull, teeth and behaviour which are rather more like sea lions (Repenning, Peterson & Hubbs 1971; Warneke & Shaughnessy 1985). The Phocoidea includes the single Family Phocidae – the ‘true seals’, distinguished from the Otariidae by the absence of a pinna and by the position of the hind flippers (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Walrus (Odobenus Rosmaurs Divergens) As a Threatened Or Endangered Species Under the Endangered Species Act
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF INTERIOR PETITION TO LIST THE PACIFIC WALRUS (ODOBENUS ROSMAURS DIVERGENS) AS A THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT © BILL HICKEY, USFWS CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY FEBRUARY 7, 2008 Notice of Petition____________________________________________________ Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary Department of the Interior 1849 C Street, N.W. Washington. D.C. 20240 Tom Melius, Regional Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Alaska Regional Office 1011 East Tudor Road Anchorage, Alaska 99503 PETITIONER The Center for Biological Diversity 1095 Market Street, Suite 511 San Francisco, CA 94103 ph: (415) 436-9682 ext 301 fax: (415) 436-9683 __________________________ Date: this 7th day of February, 2008 Shaye Wolf, Ph.D. Kassie Siegel Brendan Cummings Center for Biological Diversity Pursuant to Section 4(b) of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. §1533(b), Section 553(3) of the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. § 553(e), and 50 C.F.R. § 424.14(a), the Center for Biological Diversity hereby petitions the Secretary of the Interior, through the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“USFWS”), to list the Pacific walrus (Odobenus rosmarus divergens) as a threatened or endangered species and to designate critical habitat to ensure its survival and recovery. The Center for Biological Diversity works through science, law, and policy to secure a future for all species, great or small, hovering on the brink of extinction. The Center has over 40,000 members throughout Alaska and the United States. The Center and its members are concerned with the conservation of endangered species, including the Pacific walrus, and the effective implementation of the ESA.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 PACIFIC WALRUS (Odobenus Rosmarus Divergens)
    Revised: 1/1/2010 PACIFIC WALRUS (Odobenus rosmarus divergens): Alaska Stock STOCK DEFINITION AND GEOGRAPHIC RANGE The family Odobenidae is represented by a single modern species, Odobenus rosmarus, of which two subspecies are generally recognized: the Atlantic walrus (O. r. rosmarus) and the Pacific walrus (O. r. divergens). The two subspecies occur in geographically isolated populations. The Pacific walrus is the only stock occurring in U.S. waters and considered in this account. Pacific walrus range throughout the continental shelf waters of the Bering and Chukchi seas, occasionally moving into the East Siberian Sea and the Beaufort Sea (Figure 1). During the summer months most of the population migrates into the Chukchi Sea; however, several thousand animals, primarily adult males, aggregate near coastal haulouts in the Gulf of Anadyr, Bering Strait region, and in Bristol Bay. During the late winter breeding season walrus are found in two major concentration areas of the Bering Sea where open leads, polynyas, or thin ice occur (Fay et al. 1984). While the specific location of these groups varies annually and seasonally depending upon the extent of the sea ice, generally one group ranges from the Gulf of Anadyr into a region southwest of St. Lawrence Island, and a second group is found in the southeastern Bering Sea from south of Nunivak Island into northwestern Bristol Bay. Pacific walrus are currently managed as a single panmictic population; however, stock structure has not been thoroughly investigated. Scribner et al. (1997) found no difference in mitochondrial and nuclear DNA among walrus sampled shortly after the breeding season from four areas of the Bering Sea (Gulf of Anadyr, Koryak Coast, southeast Bering Sea, and St.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny, Historical Biogeography, and Ecology of Anophryocephalus Spp
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Laboratory of Parasitology 1992 Phylogeny, Historical Biogeography, and Ecology of Anophryocephalus spp. (Eucestoda: Tetrabothriidae) among Pinnipeds of the Holarctic during the Late Tertiary and Pleistocene Eric P. Hoberg United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, [email protected] Ann M. Adams United States Food and Drug Administration, Seafood Products Research Center, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/parasitologyfacpubs Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Parasitology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Hoberg, Eric P. and Adams, Ann M., "Phylogeny, Historical Biogeography, and Ecology of Anophryocephalus spp. (Eucestoda: Tetrabothriidae) among Pinnipeds of the Holarctic during the Late Tertiary and Pleistocene" (1992). Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology. 781. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/parasitologyfacpubs/781 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. This article is a U.S. government work, and is not subject to copyright in the United States. Phylogeny, historical biogeography, and ecology of Anophryocephalus spp. (Eucestoda: Tetrabothriidae) among pinnipeds of the Holarctic during the late Tertiary and Pleistocene E. P. HOBERG United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Biosystematic Parasitology Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center East, Building 1180, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, Md.
    [Show full text]
  • Fur Seals and Sea Lions (Otariidae): Identification of Species and Taxonomic Review
    Systematics and Biodiversity 1 (3): 339–439 Issued 16 February 2004 DOI: 10.1017/S147720000300121X Printed in the United Kingdom C The Natural History Museum Fur seals and sea lions (Otariidae): identification of species and taxonomic review Sylvia Brunner Australian Marine Mammal Research Centre, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, GPO Box 284, Canberra City, ACT 2601, Australia ∗ University of Alaska Museum, 907 Yukon Drive, Fairbanks AK 99775, United States submitted December 2002 accepted May 2003 Contents Abstract 340 Introduction 340 Materials and methods 343 Results 344 Description of species: sea lions Steller sea lion – Eumetopias jubatus 345 Southern sea lion – Otaria byronia 352 Australian sea lion – Neophoca cinerea 354 Hooker’s sea lion – Phocarctos hookeri 354 California sea lion – Zalophus californianus californianus 357 Galapagos sea lion – Zalophus californianus wollebaeki 357 Japanese sea lion – Zalophus californianus japonicus 360 Description of species: fur seals Northern fur seal – Callorhinus ursinus 360 Antarctic fur seal – Arctocephalus gazella 363 Subantarctic fur seal – Arctocephalus tropicalis 363 New Zealand fur seal – Arctocephalus forsteri 366 South African fur seal – Arctocephalus pusillus pusillus 366 Australian fur seal – Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus 368 Guadalupe fur seal – Arctocephalus townsendi 370 Galapagos fur seal – Arctocephalus galapagoensis 370 South American fur seal – Arctocephalus australis 371 Juan Fernandez fur seal – Arctocephalus philippii 374 A comparison of subspecies Arctocephalus pusillus 374 Zalophus californianus 374 Arctocephalus australis 375 The Otariidae 377 Discussion 378 References 384 Appendices I Summary details of specimens 386 II Univariate statistics for male and female otariids 405 ∗Correspondence address 339 340 Sylvia Brunner Abstract The standard anatomical descriptions given to identify species of the family Otariidae (fur seals and sea lions), particularly those for the genus Arctocephalus, have been largely inconclusive.
    [Show full text]
  • Pinnipeds Pinnipeds Sea Lions and Fur Seals Vs. Seals Walrus
    3/1/2017 Pinnipeds Pinnipeds • Learning objectives • 35 species • Understand the differences between seals, sea lions and walrus • 16 species of eared seals (family otariidae, sea lions and fur seals) • Learn about the habitat and food requirements of these species • 18 species of seal (family phocidae, or true seals) • Examine the interaction between • 1 species of walrus (family odobenidae) • Walrus and a warming Arctic Ocean • Sea lions and salmon fishers • Seals and Puget Sound contaminants • In Salish Sea • Pacific harbor seal • Northern elephant seal (rare) • Sea lions: Stellar sea lion and California sea lion Sea lions and fur seals vs. Seals Walrus • Walrus (family Odobenidae) are large pinnipeds with tusks • Both male and female have tusks; can reach 1 meter in length! • Used for defense, movement, and anchoring onto ice • Arctic Ocean • Both Pacific and Atlantic sides • Benthic‐feeder –loves clams Sea lions and fur seals (Otariidae) Seals (Phocidae) 1 3/1/2017 Walrus population Primary habitat • Population size: ~200,000 • Walrus hunted during by whalers, 1700s –early 1900 • 15,000 to 20,000 walruses harvested annually in the mid 1800s • Today, a few thousand are taken each year and stocks have rebounded to near carrying capacity Garlich‐Miller et al. 2011 Sea ice Receding sea ice Declining Arctic sea ice Minimum sea ice extent No sea ice 2 3/1/2017 Land‐based foraging Satellite‐ Sea lion populations tagged • Walrus foraging from land walrus • California sea lion ~ 300,000 deplete local benthos • Steller sea lion ~ 100,000 in
    [Show full text]
  • Mixed-Species Exhibits with Seals and Walrus
    MIXED-SPECIES EXHIBITS WITH CARNIVORANS VI. Mixed-species exhibits with Eared Seals (Otariidae), Walrus (Odobenidae) and Earless Seals (Phocidae) Written by KRISZTIÁN SVÁBIK Assistant Curator, Budapest Zoo and Botanical Garden, Hungary Email: [email protected] 13th November 2018 Refreshed: 6th June 2020 Cover photo © Krisztián Svábik Mixed-species exhibits with Eared Seals (Otariidae), Walrus (Odobenidae) and Earless Seals (Phocidae) 1 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 4 „Temporary” combinations ..................................................................................... 5 LIST OF SPECIES COMBINATIONS – OTARIIDAE .................................................... 8 California Sea Lion, Zalophus californianus .......................................................... 9 South American Sea Lion, Otaria byronia ............................................................10 Australian Sea Lion, Neophoca cinerea ................................................................ 11 Steller Sea Lion, Eumetopias jubatus .................................................................... 12 Northern Fur Seal, Callorhinus ursinus ................................................................ 13 South American Fur Seal, Arctocephalus australis .............................................. 14 Afro-Australian Fur Seal, Arctocephalus pusillus ................................................. 15 New Zealand Fur Seal, Arctocephalus forsteri
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Lions & Seals
    Sea Lions & Seals Jamie Barry, Maggie Haas, & Olivia Sanchez Pinnipedia Pinnipedia (“Seals”) All true seals and sea lions belong to the clade Pinnipedia. This clade is comprised of three families - Odobenidae (Walruses), Otariidae (Eared Seals), and Phocidae (True Seals). The term “seal” commonly refers to the order Pinnipedia, Phocidae (True Seals) Otariidae (Eared Seals) Odobenidae however both sea lions and Ringed seals, harbor Fur seals, sea lions Walruses seals, spotted seals, walruses are also classified as elephant seals, other Pinnipeds. true seals From the Latin pinna, feather or wing, and ped-, foot Who are the Pinnipeds? Photo by: http://www.pressherald.com/wp- There are currently 33 species of extant content/uploads/2016/03/811802_US_NEWS_ENV-SEALIONS_1_LA.jpg pinnipeds, each one exhibiting a few notable characteristics that distinguish them from other marine mammals. ● They are carnivorous aquatic placental mammals that heavily rely on the use of flipper-like front feet for swimming. ● The hands and feet of the pinniped are elongated and their digits are connected by webs of skin to act as flippers. ● Unlike most other marine species, the Pinnipeds are adapted to feed on fish, pinniped tail is very basic in function, as its mollusks, as well as other forms of marine steering is controlled by backward-facing hind mammal life. feet. Walruses ● These marine mammals are extremely sociable and Odobenus rosmarus can usually be found loudly bellowing and snorting at one another ● Only Native Americans are currently allowed to hunt walruses, as the species' survival was threatened by past overhunting ● Can live up to 40 years in the wild ● Can weigh up to 1.5 tons 6 ● Adult walruses are easily recognized by their prominent tusks, whiskers, and bulkiness ● This species is subdivided into three subspecies ○ The Atlantic walrus, the Pacific walrus, and the O.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practice Guidelines for Pinnipeds (Otariidae and Phocidae)
    EAZA and EAAM BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR OTARIIDAE AND PHOCIDAE EAZA Marine Mammal TAG TAG chair : Claudia Gili Acquario di Genova (Costa Edutainment spa) Ponte Spinola 16128 Genova – Italy [email protected] Editors: Claudia Gili, Gerard Meijer, Geraldine Lacave First edition, approved August 2018 Page 1 of 106 EAZA Best Practice Guidelines disclaimer 2018 Copyright (January 2016) by EAZA Executive Office, Amsterdam. All rights reserved. No parts of this publication may be reproduced in hard copy, machine‐ readable or other forms without written permission from the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA). Members of the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA) may copy this information for their own use as needed. The information contained in this EAZA Best Practice Guidelines has been obtained from numerous sources believed to be reliable. EAZA and the EAZA Marine Mammal TAG make a diligent effort to provide a complete and accurate representation of the data in its reports, publications and services. However, EAZA does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, or completeness of any information. EAZA disclaims all liability for errors or omissions that may exist and shall not be liable for any incidental, consequential, or other damages (whether resulting from negligence or otherwise) including, without limitation, exemplary damages or lost profits arising out of or in connection with the use of this publication. Because the technical information provided in the EAZA Best Practice Guidelines can easily be misread or misinterpreted unless properly analysed, EAZA strongly recommends that users of this information consult with the editors in all matters related to data analysis and interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Handout: All About Pinnipeds
    Reading Handout: All About Pinnipeds What is a marine mammal? The colossal blue whale, active sea otter, barking sea lion, plant-eating manatee and even the polar bear are all marine mammals. They share a number of characteristics with their land-dwelling relatives: they are warm-blooded, give live birth, nurse their young with milk, have hair at some time in their lives, and breathe air. But marine mammals differ from land mammals in that their livelihood depends upon the ocean. They have bodies that are particularly well suited to life at sea. Ears, limbs, and body shape have all been streamlined to reduce drag as these animals swim through the ocean. Except for sea otters, marine mammals have a thick layer of fat called blubber under their skin. This aids buoyancy, provides insulation and serves as a reserve energy source for most marine mammals. The Pinnipeds Seals, sea lions and walruses are carnivorous marine mammals that belong to the suborder Pinnipedia (PINN-ih-PED-ee-ah). The word pinniped means “feather-footed” or “fin-footed.” There are three families in this suborder: 1-The family Phocidae (FOE-sih-day) includes the “true” or “earless” seals. The true seals have tiny ear holes but no external ear flaps. 2-The family Otariidae (O-TAR-ih-day) are known as the “eared” seals and include sea lions and fur seals. 3-The family Odobenidae (O-doe-BENN-ih-day) includes the walruses and are the largest pinnipeds. Walruses are neither a seal nor sea lion, but share characteristics with each. What do seals and sea lions have in common? They are both mammals, have live young, produce milk, have hair or fur on their bodies, are air breathing, and are “endothermic” or able to control their body temperature.
    [Show full text]
  • Youngest Record of the Extinct Walrus Ontocetus Emmonsi from the Early Pleistocene of South Carolina and a Review of North Atlantic Walrus Biochronology
    Youngest record of the extinct walrus Ontocetus emmonsi from the Early Pleistocene of South Carolina and a review of North Atlantic walrus biochronology SARAH J. BOESSENECKER, ROBERT W. BOESSENECKER, and JONATHAN H. GEISLER Boessenecker, S.J., Boessenecker, R.W., and Geisler, J.H. 2018. Youngest record of the extinct walrus Ontocetus emmonsi from the Early Pleistocene of South Carolina and a review of North Atlantic walrus biochronology. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 63 (2): 279–286. The extinct North Atlantic walrus Ontocetus emmonsi is widely reported from Pliocene marine deposits in the eastern USA (New Jersey, Florida), Belgium, Netherlands, Great Britain, and Morocco. Ontocetus was slightly larger than the modern walrus Odobenus rosmarus, may have had wider climatic tolerances (subtropical), and likely originated in the western North Pacific before dispersing through the Arctic. Owing to geochronologic uncertainties in the North Atlantic Plio-Pleistocene walrus record, it is unclear whether Ontocetus and Odobenus overlapped in time and thus may have competed, or whether the two were temporally separate invasions of the North Atlantic. A new specimen of Ontocetus emmonsi (CCNHM-1144) from the Austin Sand Pit (Ridgeville, South Carolina, USA) is a complete, well-preserved left tusk that is proximally inflated and oval in cross-section, relatively short (maximum length: 369 mm) and markedly curved (radius of arc of curvature 197 mm). Globular dentine is present, confirming assignment to Odobenini; propor- tions and curvature identify the specimen as Ontocetus emmonsi rather than Odobenus. Hitherto unstudied deposits in the Austin Sand Pit lack calcareous macro and microinvertebrates, but vertebrate biochronology provides some temporal resolution.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Purisima Formation of Northern California
    PaleoBios 34:1-6, June 15, 2017 PaleoBios OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA MUSEUM OF PALEONTOLOGY Boessenecker, Robert W. (2017). A New Early Pliocene Record of the Toothless Walrus Valenictus (Carnivora, Odobenidae) from the Purisima Formation of Northern California. Cover photo: Life restoration of the extinct Pliocene walrus Valenictus and flightless auks (Mancalla) hauled out on the rocky shore of the uplifted Coast Ranges of California (top right); cliff exposures of the Purisima Formation near Santa Cruz, from where Valenictus was collected by Wayne Thompson (left); bivalves, chiefly Clinocardium meekianum, exposed in the Purisima Formation near the locality (bottom). Photo credit and original artwork: Robert W. Boessenecker. Citation: Boessenecker, Robert W. 2017. A New Early Pliocene Record of the Toothless Walrus Valenictus (Carnivora, Odobenidae) from the Puri- sima Formation of Northern California. PaleoBios, 34. ucmp_paleobios_35289 A New Early Pliocene Record of the Toothless Walrus Valenictus (Carnivora, Odobenidae) from the Purisima Formation of Northern California ROBERT W. BOESSENECKER1,2 1Department of Geology and Environmental Geosciences, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC 29424; [email protected] 2University of California Museum of Paleontology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 The walrus (Odobenus rosmarus) is a large tusked molluskivore that inhabits the Arctic and is the sole living member of the family Odobenidae. In contrast to the modern walrus, extinct walruses lived in temperate and even subtropical climates as far south as Baja California and Japan in the Pacific, and Florida and Morocco in the Atlantic. Multispe- cies walrus assemblages are now documented from several localities in the North Pacific, the center of origin for the family.
    [Show full text]