DOCSLIB.ORG

Canadian Association of Slavists Annual Conference, 2006 York University, May 27-29, 2006

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Canadian Association of Slavists Annual Conference, 2006 York University, May 27-29, 2006 CAS 2006 Canadian Association of Slavists Annual Conference, 2006 York University, May 27-29, 2006 Saturday, May 27 12:00-1:00 Annual General Meeting of the Canadian Association of Ukrainian Ethnology, VH 3003 6:00 p.m. Reception and Buffet Dinner, The Underground Restaurant. Cost: $40 per person. Sunday, May 28 1:00-3:00 p.m. Meeting of Canadian Association for Ukrainian Studies, CLH-C 3:30-5:30 p.m. Annual General Meeting of CAS, CLH-C. Monday, May 29 2:30-4:30 Joint session of Canadian Association of Slavists and Canadian Historic Association honoring Myron Momryk, Library and Archives Canada: “They Came to Canada for a Better Life”: Urban and Rural Experiences of Ukrainian- Canadians in the Interwar Period. Financial support provided by Canadian Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences Abbreviations: VH – Vari Hall; CHL – Curtis Lecture Hall Saturday, May 27 I. 10:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. 1. VH 3003 Research in Progress I (Canadian Association of Ukrainian Ethnology) Chair: Natalie Kononenko, University of Alberta. Discussant: Radomir Bilash, University of Alberta. 1. Monica Kindraka-Jensen, Indiana University. How Gus Got Buried: The Role of Narratives in Shaping Ukrainian Canadian Family Identity. 2. Zenon Wasyliw, Ithaca College. Soviet Culture in the Ukrainian Village during NEP: 1921-1928. 3. Svitlana Kukharenko, University of Alberta. Searchable Sound Files online: Using Digital Technologies in Folklore Research. 2. VH 3004 Ukrainian-Canadian Experiences Chair: Roman Shiyan, University of Alberta. 1. Paul Laverdure. Eternal Memory. Achiel Delaere and Canada’s Ukrainian Catholic Church. 2. Greg Borowetz, University of Alberta. Recorded Oral Folklore Genres in “Kalendar Kanadiiskoho Farmera.” 3. Viktoriya Topalova, University of British Columbia. Narratives of Memory and Identity in Ukrainian Canadian Women’s Life Writing. 3. VH 3005 Me, Myself and I: Multiple Forums of Identity Negotiation Chair/Discussant: Tamara Trojanowska, University of Toronto. 1. Michal Kasprzak, University of Toronto. Identity Inc.: Haggling (for) Consumerist Identities amongst Interwar Polish-Americans. 2. Olga Ponichtera, University of Toronto. Matuga and/or/as Professor Emeritus: Marian Pankowski’s Adventures Revisited. 3. Gabriela Pawlus Kasprzak, University of Toronto. Baptizing the Nation: Religion as a Vehicle for Reclaiming National Identity in 1950s Poland. 4. CLH - C Explorations in Modernism I. Chair: George Mihaychuk, Georgetown University. 1. Oleg Minin, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. Political Syncretism and Artistic Synthesis in the Satirical Journals Zhupel and Adskaia Pochta, 1905-1906. 2. John Barnstead, Dalhousie University. Mikhail Kuzmin’s Ghazals and Kandinsky’s Der Blaue Reiter. 3. Magdalena Mot, McGill University. Remizov’s Posolon’ – Regaining a Lost Cyclicity. 12:00-1:00 Annual General Meeting of the Canadian Association of Ukrainian Ethnology, VH 3003 2 II. 1:00 – 3:00 p.m. 1. VH 3003 Research in Progress II (Canadian Association of Ukrainian Ethnology) Chair: Radomir Bilash, University of Alberta. Discussant: Andrij Makuch. 1. Lessia Petriv, Alberta Community Development. Historic Gardens Take Root. 2. Karen Gabert, Carleton University. Locating Identity: Contexts and Trends in the Early Years of the Ukrainian Cultural Heritage Village. 3. Irene Jendzjowsky, Provincial Archives of Alberta. A Portrait of a Community in the Future, or What Will People Think? 2. VH 3004 Revisiting Ukraine’s Cities, Part I Chair: Taras Koznarsky, University of Toronto. 1. Anna Makolkin, University of Toronto. Festival of Romanness, Italianness, and Europeanness in Slavic Odessa. 2. Mykola Soroka, University of Toronto. The Rocking Cradle: Kyiv in Russian and Ukrainian Émigré Letters, 1920-1939. 3. VH 3005 Napoleon and Poland: the Bicentenary of Napoleon’s Entrance into Poland Chair: John McErlean, York University. Discussant: Piotr Wrobel, University of Toronto. 1. Benoit Roger, L’Universite de Paris (Pantheon-Sorbonne). Entre Dresde et Varsovie: le duel des diplomats français, 1807-1809. 2. John Stanley. The Culture of the Duchy of Warsaw. 3. Katarzyna Rozanska, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan. The Depiction of Napoleon in the Poetry of the Duchy of Warsaw. 4. Anna Kuligowska-Korzeniewska, University of Lódz. The Apotheosis of Napoleon in the National Theatre, Warsaw (1807). 4. CLH - C Explorations in Modernism II. Chair: John Barnstead, Dalhousie University. 1. Mykola Polyuha, University of Western Ontario. On the East-West Crossroads: Filling Gaps in Modernist Studies. 2. Natalia Tukhareli, CERES, University of Toronto. The Image of Memory in the Prose of Vladimir Nabokov. 3. Nino Amiranashvili, University of Waterloo. Boris Pasternak’s Georgian Translations. 3 III. 3:30 p.m. – 5:30 p.m. 1. VH 3003 Research in Progress III (Canadian Association of Ukrainian Ethnology) Chair: Andrij Makuch, University of Toronto. Discussant: Natalie Kononenko, University of Alberta. 1. Steve Prystupa. Pop Goes the Culture: A Preliminary Overview and Conceptualization of Ukrainian Canadian Popular Culture. 2. Orysia Tracz, University of Manitoba. Talking to Dead People: Conversations with the Departed in Ukrainian Folk Songs. 3. Joan Margel. A Rycroft Babka’s View. 2. VH 3004 Revisiting Ukraine’s Cities, Part II Chair: TBA. 1. Olga Andriewsky, Trent University. Imagining the “Mother of All Russian Cities”: The Construction of Kyiv and the Russian Nation-Building Project in the 19th c. 2. Taras Koznarsky, University of Toronto. Urbi et Orbi: Shaping the Kyivan Text in the 20th c. 3. VH 3005 Other Modernities: Lost in the 20th Century? Chair: Oleg Minin, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. 1. George Mihaychuk, Georgetown University. Semenko’s Pierrot: A Futurist Project. 2. Zina Gimpelevich, University of Waterloo. Legacy of Valentin Innokentievich Annenskii (Krivich). 3. Arthur Płaczkiewicz, University of Toronto. Constant Recontextualizations of Miron Białoszewski. 4. CLH - C Cultural Products: Center and Peripheries Chair: Mykola Polyuha, University of Western Ontario. 1. Patryk Reid, Carleton University. “Stalin’s Favorite” and “the Lenin of the Uzbeks”: Joining and Mediating the Bolshevik Revolution in Central Asia. 2. Violetta Gudkova, Moscow State Research Institute for Art Studies. Typology of Russian Dramaturgy in the 1920s and the Birth of “Soviet Plots.” 3. Roman Shiyan, University of Alberta. The “Cultural Hero” of Ukrainian Legend. 6:00 p.m. Reception and Buffet Dinner, The Underground Restaurant. Cost: $40 per person. 4 Sunday, May 28 I. 10:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. 1. VH 3003 Research in Progress IV (Canadian Association of Ukrainian Ethnology) Chair: Irene Jendzjowsky, Provincial Archives of Alberta. Discussant: Steve Prystupa. 1. Stefan Sokolowski, University of Alberta. The Only Place to Go: The Hilliard Pool Hall, 1925-1960. 2. Gord Yaremchuk, University of Alberta. Preservation of Ukrainian Culture in Alberta Public Schools. 3. David Makowsky. The Provincial Tax Man in 1920s East Central Alberta: A Study of Municipal Districts. 2. VH 3004 New Approaches to Dostoevsky and Tolstoy Chair: Andrew Donskov, University of Ottawa. Discussant: Taras Koznarsky, University of Toronto. 1. Lonny Harrison, University of Toronto. “Khoroshii ton” in 1840s Petersburg: Dostoevsky’s chinovniki and the Problem of Social Conformity. 2. Arkadi Klioutchanski, University of Ottawa/University of Toronto. Tolstoy’s Rational Path to His “Spiritual Crisis” (1870s). 3. Timothy Ormond, University of Toronto. Sergei Bondarchuk’s Adaptation of “War and Peace.” 3. VH 3005 Library Studies Chair: Sonia Pritchard, University of Ottawa. 1. Hope Olson, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; Gust Olson (co-presenters). Constructed Discourses in Soviet/Russian Classification. 2. Keren Dali, University of Toronto; Juris Dilevko, University of Toronto. Smoothing the Transition: Retraining Centres for East European Immigrant Librarians in Canada. 4. CLH - C Politics and Language: Manipulation, Democracy, and Eros Chair: Roman Senkus, CIUS. 1. Valerii Polkovsky, University of Alberta. The Language of the Presidential Campaign in Ukraine. 2. Maryna Romanets, University of Northern British Columbia. Ukrainian Political Unconscious: The Hero, the Phallus, and the Castrating Female. 3. Magda Stroinska, McMaster University. Parasitic Speech Acts and Polish Populist Rhetoric: from Solidarity to Self-Defence. 5 II. 1:00 – 3:00 p.m. 1. VH 3003 Explorations in Linguistics Chair: Gust Olson. 1. Alena Sourkova, Belarussian State University (Minsk). Concept of “Knowledge” in Old Slavic Linguistic Epistemology. 2. Sonia Pritchard, University of Ottawa. Acoustic Cue Weighting in Bulgarian Vowel-Liquid Metathesis. 3. Joanna Lustanski, McMaster University. Languages in Contact: Polish Dialect in Canada. 2. VH 3004 Nineteenth-Century Russian Literature and Society Chair: Donna Tussing Orwin, University of Toronto. Discussant: Arkadi Klioutchanski, University of Ottawa, University of Toronto. 1. Mark Conliffe, Willamette University. A Wishful Man, or a Conscience of His Time? Korolenko’s Social and Literary Criticism. 2. Inna Ishchenko Tigountsova, University of Victoria. Tsars and Prophets, or Tales of Pushkin, Gogol’, and Dostoevsky. 3. Rolf Hellebust, University of Calgary. The Journey to the Underworld in Turgenev’s “Bezhin Meadow.” 3. VH 3005 Belarusan Culture Chair: Robert Karpiak, University of Waterloo. 1. Ivonka Survilla, Belarusan Institute of Arts and Sciences, Canada. Belarusan Post-Chernobyl Visual Art. 2. Zina Gimpelevich, University of Waterloo.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • History Is Made in the Dark 4: Alexander Nevsky: the Prince, the Filmmaker and the Dictator
    1 History Is Made in the Dark 4: Alexander Nevsky: The Prince, the Filmmaker and the Dictator In May 1937, Sergei Eisenstein was offered the opportunity to make a feature film on one of two figures from Russian history, the folk hero Ivan Susanin (d. 1613) or the mediaeval ruler Alexander Nevsky (1220-1263). He opted for Nevsky. Permission for Eisenstein to proceed with the new project ultimately came from within the Kremlin, with the support of Joseph Stalin himself. The Soviet dictator was something of a cinephile, and he often intervened in Soviet film affairs. This high-level authorisation meant that the USSR’s most renowned filmmaker would have the opportunity to complete his first feature in some eight years, if he could get it through Stalinist Russia’s censorship apparatus. For his part, Eisenstein was prepared to retreat into history for his newest film topic. Movies on contemporary affairs often fell victim to Soviet censors, as Eisenstein had learned all too well a few months earlier when his collectivisation film, Bezhin Meadow (1937), was banned. But because relatively little was known about Nevsky’s life, Eisenstein told a colleague: “Nobody can 1 2 find fault with me. Whatever I do, the historians and the so-called ‘consultants’ [i.e. censors] won’t be able to argue with me”.i What was known about Alexander Nevsky was a mixture of history and legend, but the historical memory that was most relevant to the modern situation was Alexander’s legacy as a diplomat and military leader, defending a key western sector of mediaeval Russia from foreign foes.
    [Show full text]
  • Eisenstein's Alexander Nevsky
    IMAGES OF POWER AND THE POWER OF IMAGES: EISENSTEIN’S ALEXANDER NEVSKY "Sights and sounds pointed the way to God, not philosophical speculation or literary subtlety." Billington, The Icon and the Axe Embedded in the title of this conference, "imagining Russia," are two vantage points from which the gaze, and the imagination, proceed. One is Russia as imagined by those outside her borders; the other is Russia as imagined by Russians. The constructs differ, at times significantly, and perhaps some of the confusion to which Mark Von Hagen alluded when he spoke of our often frustrated desire to believe that Russia is like us and will, when it changes, change toward us, derives from the our failure to understand Russia as Russians imagine her. Unlike many of the speakers at this conference, who construed its title broadly, I chose to confine myself to a narrower focus, and to consider images, specifically the images Sergei Eisenstein created in Alexander Nevsky, and how he used the capabilities of cinema to portray power. In the Soviet Union of the 1930s, as indeed before and long after, cinema’s unique combination of mass medium, art form, propaganda mechanism and entertainment industry made it a continuing battlefield for conflicts of major ideological and artistic significance. Nevsky holds particular interest because of its accessibility and genuine popularity: it alone, of all Eisenstein’s films, achieved widespread success. To be sure, much of the reason for its popularity was circumstantial: if the Nazi-Soviet Pact took it off screens shortly after it first appeared, the Nazi invasion guaranteed not only its distribution but also its acute relevance.
    [Show full text]
  • A Plea for Leninist Intolerance Slavoj Žižek Critical Inquiry, Vol. 28, No. 2. (Winter, 2002), Pp. 542-566
    A Plea for Leninist Intolerance Slavoj Žižek Critical Inquiry, Vol. 28, No. 2. (Winter, 2002), pp. 542-566. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0093-1896%28200224%2928%3A2%3C542%3AAPFLI%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Q Critical Inquiry is currently published by The University of Chicago Press. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/ucpress.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers, and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. http://www.jstor.org Tue Mar 25 13:29:57 2008 A Plea for Leninist Intolerance Slavoj ~iiek LeninS Choice What is tolerance today? The most popular TV show of the fall of 2000 in France, with a viewer rating two times higher than that of the notori- ous Big Brother reality soap, is C'est mon choix (It's my choice) on France 3, a talk-show whose guest is each time an ordinary (or, exceptionally, well- known) person who made a peculiar choice that determined his or her entire lifestyle.
    [Show full text]
  • Eisenstein, Part 2: "[As] in Life Itself" – Montage from 1930
    Eisenstein, Part 2: "[As] in life itself" – Montage from 1930 Evan Wm. Cameron Professor Emeritus Senior Scholar in Screenwriting Graduate Programmes, Film & Video and Philosophy York University [Earliest version presented in class in the fall of 1967. Revision recorded in the fall of 1971 as part of one of "Nine Lectures on Film Design" under the title "Eisenstein: the Marxist as Film Designer" by WBUR FM, Boston, Massachusetts, for broadcast in the spring of 1972; rebroadcast in the spring of 1973 on WROR and WRKO, Boston, and distributed thereafter through the National Public Radio network and local stations. Revised recurringly thereafter, extensively so in the mid-1980s and 1994-1996.] Eisenstein, Part 2: "[As] in life itself" – Montage from 19301 The philosophers have merely interpreted the world in various ways; the point, however, is to change it. Karl Marx2 To convince someone of the truth it is not adequate to establish the truth. One has to find the way from error to truth. Ludwig Wittgenstein3 I've a horror of films de cadrages. I detest unusual angles. I sometimes work out a marvellously clever shot with my cameraman. Everything is all beautifully prepared, and we just burst out laughing and scrap the whole thing to shoot quite straight forwardly with no camera effects. Luis Buñuel4 1 The phrase '… in life itself' is Eisenstein's own. See the quotation from "Word and Image" reproduced on pages 22 and 27 below. The bulk of the translations of writings of Eisenstein that I shall use throughout this essay are by Jay Leyda as found within Film Form: Essays in Film Theory and The Film Sense by Sergei Eisenstein, edited and translated by Jay Leyda (Cleveland, Ohio and New York, New York: Meridian Books – The World Publishing Company, 1957 [Fifth Printing, 1963].
    [Show full text]
  • Babel Chronology
    Isaac Emmanuilovich Babel: A Chronology by Gregory Freidin Final Version: February 10, 2001 1894 Isaac Babel is born (June 30) in Moldavanka, a poor district near the harbor of Odessa, to Feiga and Man Yitzkhovich Bobel, a dealer in agricultural machinery. Soon after, the Babel family relocates to Nikolayev (150 kilometers from Odessa). Babel studies English, French, and German; private Hebrew lessons. 1899 Babel’s sister, Meriam, born on July 16. 1905 The October Manifesto of Czar Nicholas II establishes a constitutional monarchy. # Pogroms In southern Russia, including Nikolayev, witnessed by Babel. But the family is untouched. 1906 Babel’s family, now considerably more prosperous, moves back to Odessa and settles in the residential center of the city. Babel enrolls in the Nicholas I Commercial School in Odessa; begins writing stories in French. 1911 After an unsuccessful attempt to enroll at the University of Odessa (due to the restrictions on Jews), Babel enters the Institute of Finance and Business Studies in Kiev. Meets Eugenia Borisovna Gronfein, his future wife. 1913 First publication: the story “Old Shloyme.” 1914 World War I begins. 1915 Babel follows his institute’s evacuation from Kiev to Saratov. 1916 After graduating from the institute, moves to St. Petersburg, meets Maxim Gorky, and begins to contribute stories and sketches to Gorky’s journal Letopis and other periodicals (stories: “Mama, Rimma, and Alla,” Elya Isaakovich and Margarita Prokofievna”). Babel’s stories receive a favorable response from reviewers. 1917 Charged with writing pornography (story “The Bathroom Window”) but the charge is made moot by the political turmoil. Isaac Babel 1894-1940 A Chronology The February Revolution.1 Czar Nicholas II abdicates.
    [Show full text]
  • People As Propaganda: Personifications of Homeland in Nazi German and Soviet Russian Cinema
    People as Propaganda: Personifications of Homeland in Nazi German and Soviet Russian Cinema A thesis submitted to the Graduate School Of the University of Cincinnati In partial fulfilment of the Requirement for the degree of Master of Arts In the Department of German Studies Of the College of Arts and Sciences By Alexa J. Mendez B.A. German Studies University of Cincinnati B.A. History University of Cincinnati June 2015 Committee Chair: Valerie A. Weinstein, Ph.D. Abstract This thesis analyzes the use of film in Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia as extensions of propaganda and sociopolitical indoctrination within both regimes. Moreover, this thesis analyzes the ways in which each respective nation's concept of homeland ('Heimat' in German, 'Rodina' in Russian) coincided with political thought. Through this, both regimes utilized cinema as a platform for propagating ideas of homeland via the portrayal of the perfect citizen of their regime. This study demonstrates this through the analysis of Nazi German and Soviet Russian films of similar content, themes, and production dates. This study thus argues that a homeland, as demonstrated through select films produced by each regime between the years of 1933-1945, is comprised of its people, whom each State attempted to mold into perfect citizens. Although ideas of what defined the perfect citizen varied between Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia, many similarities between them are to be drawn. Dissecting these similarities allows for greater academic understanding of the atrocities and events that occurred throughout the twentieth century in the name of both schools of thought. i ©Alexa Mendez 2015 ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank everyone who has made this thesis possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction This collection of essays is dedicated to Barry Scherr by his admiring col- leagues, many of them former students. It assembles research on a broad array of topics, including Russian poetry, prose, and film. Scherr has produced sig­ nificant scholarship in all of these areas, but more importantly, that work has influenced and inspired his colleagues to further exploration. Functioning like a rhizome, Scherr’s immense and varied research has sustained a generation of Slavists and helped to produce a new one. In context, the phrase quoted in the volume title is somewhat bleak. Ana- lyzing scenes cut from Sergei Eisenstein’s Alexander Nevsky, Barry Scherr laments that the intact film might have shown ways in which “Russia meant more to the rest of the world than a convenient territory to be invaded.”1 But lifted from its place, Scherr’s reference to Russia as a “convenient territory” serves as an apt metaphor for both the object of his lifelong scholarship and the amplitude of that work. A preponderance of his research turns on the late tsarist period and early decades of the Soviet experiment—Maxim Gorky, Alexander Grin, Sergei Eisenstein, Isaak Babel—and most of the essays collected here address this pivotal phase in Russian art, the era of European modernism. But a few extend back in time to what historians, in somewhat delphic fashion, have christened the “late modern,” including the nineteenth century of Pushkin, Dostoevsky, and Tolstoy, and one essay speaks to the work of Joseph Brodsky, whose life, though not his art, coincided with the postmodern.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 15, 2005 (PDF)
    g{x V{|vÉ [|áàÉÜ|tÇ iÉÄâÅx DH ECCH Cover image copyright 1994-2005 Lasting Impressions with Panache 2 Juniper Lane Georgetown, MA 01833 978-352-2038 www.lasimppan.com Contents copyright 2005 by the Chico Historian All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, rewording, or otherwise except for the inclusion of brief quotations in a review, without the prior permission in writing from the publishers. The copyright reverts to each author upon further publication of his or her article. g{x V{|vÉ [|áàÉÜ|tÇ iÉÄâÅx DH ECCH EDITOR Patrick O’Connor ASSISTANT EDITOR Frances Morrow EDITORIAL BOARD Robyn Hafer Brian John Brian Kiunke Molly Meyer Neil Plummer FACULTY ADVISORS Chico Historian Dr. Judith Raftery Phi Alpha Theta Dr. Steven Lewis Published by the Alpha Delta Omicron Chapter PHI ALPHA THETA Department of History California State University, Chico Xw|àÉÜËá aÉàx Having no previous experience in the fields of publishing and editing, I must admit that I was somewhat surprised when I was approached by Dr. Judith Raftery, who offered me the opportunity of serving as editor of this year’s edition of the Chico Historian. I accepted, not quite sure what to expect but nevertheless eager to test my mettle against… well, I wasn’t sure. Needless to say, the experience has been educational if nothing else; hopefully you will find the contents of this year’s edition to be equally so. Not only did I acquire valuable experience, but I learned a lot as well.
    [Show full text]
  • LITERATURE in the UKRAINIAN–CRIMEAN TATAR ENCOUNTER Rory Finnin ABSTRACT at a Time of Geopolitical
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Apollo “A BRIDGE BETWEEN US”: LITERATURE IN THE UKRAINIAN–CRIMEAN TATAR ENCOUNTER Rory Finnin ABSTRACT At a time of geopolitical instability in the Black Sea region, the question of the solidarity between two ethnically, religiously, and linguistically divergent peoples—Ukrainians and Crimean Tatars— will influence the extent to which Crimea remains a global flashpoint for the foreseeable future. Despite its significance, however, this solidary relationship has been either overlooked as a discrete object of inquiry or dismissed as a mere political “marriage of convenience” in research literature. This article seeks to delve more deeply into the dynamics of Ukrainian–Crimean Tatar relations and to direct special attention to its cultural drivers, particularly in the realm of literature. Representing the first comparative study of Ukrainian and Crimean Tatar literatures in the English language, this article posits that works by such prominent figures as Lesia Ukraïnka and Şamil Alâdin have actively engaged in intricate, mutual processes of “nominal metaphorization” since the late nineteenth century. These processes, which center on representations of experiences of victimization, help account not only for the practical and political nature of the Ukrainian–Crimean Tatar alliance, but also for its affective and empathic power. Keywords: Ukrainian literature, Crimean Tatar literature, solidarity, Black Sea studies On the early morning of March 18, 2015, exactly one year after Russia’s annexation of Ukraine’s Autonomous Republic of Crimea, a group of three men placed a “frozen monument” measuring at least six feet high near the building of the Administration of the President in Ukraine’s capital Kyiv (Kiev).1 Encased within a tower of ice were two national symbols, the Ukrainian tryzub (trident) and the Crimean Tatar terek-tamga, suspended in tense relation.
    [Show full text]
  • Eisenstein, Sergei Mikhailovich (1898-1948) by Daryl Chin
    Eisenstein, Sergei Mikhailovich (1898-1948) by Daryl Chin Encyclopedia Copyright © 2015, glbtq, Inc. Entry Copyright © 2002, glbtq, Inc. Reprinted from http://www.glbtq.com One of the greatest filmmakers in the history of cinema, Sergei Eistenstein was one of the first directors to take seriously the role of film editing as a means of narrative, a way of manipulating time and space by linking and juxtaposing images. Eisenstein was born on January 23, 1898 in Riga, Latvia. He attended the science- oriented Realshule to prepare himself for engineering school, but he also performed in a children's theater troupe while a student. In 1915, he entered Petrograd's Institute of Civil Engineering, his father's alma mater. However, he evinced as much interest in art and theater as he did in engineering. During the February 1917 Revolution, Eisenstein served in the volunteer militia and in the engineering corps of the Russian army. In the spring of 1918, following the October Revolution of 1917, he joined the Red Army. His father, however, supported the White Russian army and subsequently emigrated. In 1920 Eisenstein entered the General Staff Academy in Moscow where he joined the First Workers' Theater of Proletcult as a scenic and costume designer. He collaborated with several experimental theater groups. Despite his success in the theater, however, Eisenstein eagerly embraced film as the artistic medium that could most efficiently convey communist ideas and ideals. From the beginning of his career as a filmmaker he took a theoretical approach. The idea of editing to create a truly cinematic language became codified as "montage." Sergei Eisenstein ca This theoretical approach to the cinema can be found in Eisenstein's first feature film, 1910.
    [Show full text]
  • Pages from 610151
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Dynamic Typicality Geil, A. Publication date 2016 Document Version Final published version Published in Sergei M. Eisenstein: Notes for a General History of Cinema Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Geil, A. (2016). Dynamic Typicality. In N. Kleiman, & A. Somaini (Eds.), Sergei M. Eisenstein: Notes for a General History of Cinema (pp. 333-346). (Film Theory in Media History). Amsterdam University Press. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:26 Sep 2021 7. Dynamic Typicality Abe Geil Eisenstein references his famous method of typage (tipazh) just once in his Notes for a General History of Cinema. With an anachronistic juxtaposition of the sort that pervades these texts, Eisenstein marks “a direct transition” from the “enthusiasm for an element of crudité” found in Degas’s paintings of bathing women to “the aesthetics’ of typage in all its ‘unattractiveness.”1 If the Notes appear to have noth- ing more to say about typage per se, it is worth recalling that for Eisenstein the significance of typage exceeds its narrow definition as a technique for casting nonactors as social types.
    [Show full text]
  • Eisenstein Rediscovered
    Eisenstein Rediscovered Edited by Ian Christie and Richard Taylor London and New York Contents Illustrations ix Notes on contributors xi General editors' preface xv Acknowledgements xvii Note on transliteration and translation ixx Introduction: rediscovering Eisenstein 1 Ian Christie I Eisenstein studies today: text and context 1 Arguments and ancestors 33 Naum Kleiman 2 Jay Leyda and Bezhin Meadow 41 David Stirk and Elena Pinto Simon 3 Eisenstein's early films abroad S3 Kristin Thompson 4 Recent Eisenstein texts 64 Introduction: Eisenstein at La Sarraz 64 Richard Taylor Imitation as mastery 66 Sergei Eisenstein Some personal reflections on taboo 71 Sergei Eisenstein II Eisenstein's roots 5 Eisenstein and Russian Symbolist culture: an unknown script of October 79 Yuri Tsivian viii Contents 6 Eisenstein's theatre work 110 Robert Leach 7 Eisenstein's Pushkin project 126 Hdkan Lovgren 8 Eisenstein and Shakespeare 140 N. M. Lary 9 Graphic flourish: aspects of the art of mise-en-scene 151 Arun Khopkar III The practice of theory 10 Eisenstein as theoretician: preliminary considerations 167 Edoardo G. Grossi 11 The essential bone structure: mimesis in Eisenstein 177 Mikhail Yampolsky 12 Eisenstein and the theory of 'models'; or, how to distract the spectator's attention 189 Myriam Tsikounas 13 Eisenstein and the theory of the photogram 200 Francois Albera 14 The frame and montage in Eisenstein's 'later' aesthetics 211 Michael O'Pray Notes 219 Index 255 Illustrations Frontispiece: Eisenstein as a child i 1 Shooting Potemkin xx 2 A discarded scene
    [Show full text]