DOCSLIB.ORG

Quarterly Cargo Crime Update – July/ August/ September 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Quarterly Cargo Crime Update – July/ August/ September 2020 Quarterly Cargo Crime Update – July/ August/ September 2020 Q3 2020 Author: NaVCIS Intelligence Analyst Contributor: NaVCIS Intelligence Researcher Date/version: 30th November 2020/v.2 Classification: OFFICIAL Handling instructions: This document is intended to inform NaVCIS’ strategic governance structures and Freight industry partners. This document should not be shared outside of this audience without prior permission of the author. OFFICIAL Quarterly Cargo Crime Update – July/ August/ September 2020 Introduction Partners NaVCIS receive cargo crime notifications from a number of sources The work undertaken by NaVCIS Freight Crime would not be possible namely Police, Industry, Hauliers, Insurers, Cargo Surveyors, Trade without the assistance & funding from our financial partners. Organisations, the Road Haulage Association, and the British International Freight Association. Reported cargo crime data is received regularly from 34 UK police forces. The remaining forces provide data on a quarterly basis. Aims and Objectives The aim of this report is to analyse the cargo crime data in relation to all cargo crime notifications received for the period July, August and September 2020 (Q3), in order to provide an overview and assessment of the scale and nature of thefts nationally. For more information, please contact us at [email protected] Creating value from data 2 OFFICIAL Quarterly Cargo Crime Update – July/ August/ September 2020 Key Findings Recommendations • There were 1041 Cargo crime notifications during Q3. • Discover what security measures are currently in place • The total loss in Q3 was £18,015,418.06. at the most vulnerable MSA’s and look at ways to • 70% of notifications were Theft From Motor Vehicle (TFMV) increase them if appropriate. offences. • Consider any alternatives to using soft-sided trailers to • Essex was the top force area for TFMV offences (12%). transport commodities or look at ways to improve the • There were 253 notifications of cargo crime at Motorway security of the soft-sided trailer. For example, use Service Areas (MSA’s). slash resistant tarpaulins. • Toddington Services, M1, was the most vulnerable MSA (8%). • Consider regularly changing routes or stops for breaks • There were 518 notifications of cargo crimes at Independent in order to prevent any recognisable patterns for the Road Parking locations. journey. • Curtain Slashing was the most frequently reported method of • Plan journeys to include stops for breaks at secure entry to trailer for TFMV offences (46%). parking places. • Fuel was the most frequently stolen commodity (24%). • South Yorkshire was the top force area for theft of fuel offences (19%). • The hotspot areas were split into 3 in terms of describing a more geographical location; North; Midlands and South (and To find out how to join our sponsorship team and how we can not necessarily volume). The north hotspot comprised of 35 work together to assist in combating Freight & Cargo crime – offences, the Midlands hotspot comprised of 20 offences and please contact: [email protected] the South hotspot comprised of 108 offences. 3 OFFICIAL Quarterly Cargo Crime Update – July/ August/ September 2020 Overview During July, August and September 2020 (Q3), NaVCIS have received Figure 2 shows the number of cargo crime offences per day, during Q3 2020, 1041 notifications of HGV, Freight and Cargo crimes. This is a 33% according to notifications received by NaVCIS using ‘earliest date’ of the increase in the number of offences compared to Q2. It is inferred that offence. There are two clear spikes on 25th August (29) and 26th August (27), this is due to the effects of the COVID-19 crisis period, as notifications which over both dates include TFMV offences (41), Vehicle Interference during this quarter are at similar levels to the number of notifications in offences (14) and one theft offence. The offences on both dates occurred Q1 (just before/at start of COVID-19 period). across 15 different force areas, with Leicestershire having the most offences (14), followed by Derbyshire (7), Staffordshire (6), Essex (4), Metropolitan The highest number of notifications received during Q3 was in (4), Bedfordshire (3), South Yorkshire (3), Warwickshire (3), Avon & September (411), whilst the cost price value was highest during August Somerset (2), Kent (2), Nottinghamshire (2), South Wales (2), Surrey (2), TVP (£7,964,485.15). The combined cost price value of all cargo crimes in Q3 (1) and West Yorkshire (1). The majority of offences occurred at is £18,015,418.06, but retail values would be at least four times greater. Independent Road Parking locations (54%) and occurred overnight (52%). Figure 2 – Cargo Crime offences per day during Q3 Figure 1 – Cargo Crime notifications 4 OFFICIAL Quarterly Cargo Crime Update – July/ August/ September 2020 Hotspot areas Overview of Hotspot areas The north hotspot comprised of 35 offences, the Midlands hotspot comprised of 20 offences and the South hotspot comprised of 108 offences. Within the North hotspot area, the highest offence type was TFMV (48%), followed by Vehicle Interference (46%), Burglary (3%) and Attempt theft (3%). Within the Midlands hotspot area, the highest offence type was TFMV (60%), followed by Vehicle Interference (40%). Within the South hotspot area, the highest offence type was TFMV (81%), followed by Vehicle Interference (17%) and Deception (2%). Figure 3 – Hotspot area – Overview Further details of these hotspot areas are shown across Figure 3 shows a heatmap of all cargo crime notifications the following slides. received during Q3, using the offence postcode. The hotspot areas can be split into three areas in terms of simplified geographical locations (not volume of offences): 1) North; 2) Midlands; 3) South. 5 OFFICIAL Quarterly Cargo Crime Update – July/ August/ September 2020 Hotspot 1- North Area Hotspot 1 comprises of 2 clusters of offences 1. Wetherby, 2. Whitwood & Normanton, North Yorkshire West Yorkshire LS22 5GT x 16 WF10 5QH x 12 LS22 7DN x 2 WF6 2UA x 1 LS22 7TS x 1 WF10 5NP x 1 Total 19 WF6 1TD x 1 WF6 1ZB x 1 Total 16 Figure 5 – Hotspot 1 – Cluster 2 Figure 4 – Hotspot 1 – Cluster 1 Figure 5 shows a column map of cluster 2, within hotspot 1, comprising Figure 4 shows a column map of cluster 1, within hotspot 1, of 16 offences: comprising of 19 offences: WF10 5QH - Exelby Services, M62 – TS LS22 5GT- Wetherby Services, A1(M) – MSA . Vehicle Interference offences (10) and TFMV offences (2) . TFMV offences (10) and Vehicle Interference offences (6) . Offences occurred between 28/08/2020 (3) and 25/09/2020 (9) . Offences occurred between 01/07/2020 and 27/09/2020 WF10 5NP – Whitwood – IRP LS22 7DN – Wetherby – IRP . TFMV offence (1) . TFMV offences (2) . Offence occurred 02/09/2020 . Offences occurred on 31/07/2020 and 05/08/2020 WF6 1ZB – Normanton – IRP LS22 7DS – Wetherby – IRP . TFMV (1) . TFMV (1) . Offence occurred 11/09/2020 . Offence occurred 05/08/2020 WF6 1TD – Normanton – IRP . Burglary (1) . Offence occurred 28/08/2020 WF6 2UA – Normanton – SY . Attempt theft (1) 6 OFFICIAL . Offence occurred 10/08/2020 Quarterly Cargo Crime Update – July/ August/ September 2020 Hotspot 2 – Midlands Area Hotspot 2 comprises of 1 main cluster 1. Leicestershire LE3 3GB x 19 LE3 1UJ x 1 Total 20 . 68% of the offences at LE3 3GB occurred between the 17th and 26th August. Of these offences, the majority occurred overnight (69%) and the method of entry (where known) was ‘curtain slashing’ (91%) and ‘Seals/padlock cut’ (9%, 1 offence). Only three offences occurred in September, Figure 6 – Hotspot 2 suggesting that this area will be a less vulnerable location looking forward. Figure 6 shows a column map of hotspot 2, comprising of 20 offences: LE3 3GB – Leicester Forest East Services, M1 – MSA . TFMV offences (11) and Vehicle Interference offences (8) . Offences occurred between 01/07/2020 and 09/09/2020 LE3 1UJ – Leicester – IRP . TFMV offence (1) . Offence occurred 04/07/2020 7 OFFICIAL Quarterly Cargo Crime Update – July/ August/ September 2020 Hotspot 3 – South Area Hotspot 3 comprises of 5 clusters of offences 1. M1 3. A1 (M), 5. Along A2 Kent Bedfordshire Hertfordshire ME13 8XE x 1 LU5 6HR x 12 EN6 3NE x 12 ME13 8YN x 1 LU5 6HP x 8 EN6 3QQ x 10 ME13 9LZ x 1 Total 20 2. M11 Essex Total 22 4. M25 Essex ME13 9SR x 5 CM23 5QZ x 15 RM19 1SR x 3 ME13 9HY x 1 Total 15 RM19 1TS x 5 ME13 9LL x 2 RM19 1YX x 1 CT2 9AZ x 1 RM19 1NX x1 CT1 3TQ x 3 RM19 1NS x 1 CT4 7AA x 5 RM16 3BG x 7 CT4 5AA x 2 RM20 3WD x 1 CT4 5EU x 1 RM20 3LH x 1 CT4 6HJ x 1 Total 20 CT4 6RL x 1 CT15 7LE x 2 Figure 7 – Hotspot 3 CT16 3LG x 1 CT15 5EW x 1 CT16 1LU x 1 Further details of these clusters are shown across the following slides. CT17 9TP x 1 Total 31 8 OFFICIAL Quarterly Cargo Crime Update – July/ August/ September 2020 Hotspot 3 – South Area Figure 8 – Hotspot 3 – Cluster 1 Figure 9 – Hotspot 3 – Cluster 2 Figure 10 – Hotspot 3 – Cluster 3 Figure 8 shows a column map of cluster 1, within hotspot Figure 9 shows a column map of cluster 2, within hotspot Figure 10 shows a column map of cluster 3, within 3, comprising of 20 offences: 3, comprising of 15 offences: hotspot 3, comprising of 22 offences: LU5 6HR – Toddington Services M1 - MSA CM23 5QZ – Birchanger Green Services M11 - MSA EN6 3NE – A1(M) - TS . TFMV offences (8) and Vehicle Interference offences (4) . TFMV offences (15) . TFMV offences (6) and Vehicle Interference offences (6) . Offences occurred between 03/07/2020 and .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 160 Great Britain for Updates, Visit Wigan 27 28
    160 Great Britain For Updates, visit www.routex.com Wigan 27 28 Birkenhead Liverpool M62 36 Manchester Stockport M56 Mold Chester 35 Congleton Wrexham 59 M6 Shrewsbury 64 65 07 Wolverhampton Walsall West Bromwich Llandrindod Birmingham Wells Solihull M6 03 Coventry Warwick02 Carmarthen Hereford 01 51 60 Neath M5 Swansea 06 Pontypridd Bridgend Caerphilly Newport Cardiff M4 13 Barry Swindon M5 Bristol 61 14 Weston-super-Mare Kingswood 31 Bath 32 M4 05 Trowbridge 62 Newbury Taunton M5 20 Yeovil Winchester Exeter Southampton 55 Exmouth M27 Poole Lymington Bournemouth Plymouth Torbay Newport GB_Landkarte.indd 160 05.11.12 12:44 Great Britain 161 Wakefield 16 Huddersfield Hull Barnsley Doncaster Scunthorpe Grimsby Rotherham Sheffield M1 Louth 47M1 Heanor Derby Nottingham 48 24 Grantham 15 Loughborough 42 King's Leicester Lynn 39 40 Aylsham Peterborough Coventry Norwich GB 46 01 Warwick Huntingdon Thetford Lowestoft 45 M1 Northampton 02 43 44 Cambridge Milton Bedford Keynes Biggleswade Sawston 18 M40 19 Ipswich Luton Aylesbury Oxford Felixstowe Hertford 21 50 M25 M11 Chelmsford 61 30 53 52 Slough London Bracknell Southend-on-Sea Newbury Grays 54 Wokingham 29 Rochester Basingstoke 22 M3 Guildford M2 M25 Maidstone Winchester 23 M20 17 M27 Portsmouth Chichester Brighton La Manche Calais Newport A16 A26 Boulogne-sur-Mer GB_Landkarte.indd 161 05.11.12 12:44 162 Great Britain Forfar Perth Dundee 58 Stirling Alloa 34 Greenock M90 Dumbarton Kirkintilloch Dunfermline 57 Falkirk Glasgow Paisley Livingston Edinburgh Newton M8 Haddington Mearns 04 56 Dalkeith 26 Irvine Kilmarnock Ayr Hawick A74(M) 41 Dumfries 25 Morpeth Newcastle Carlisle Upon Whitley Bay 12Tyne 08 South Shields Gateshead 09 11 Durham 49 Redcar 33 Stockton-on-Tees M6 Middlesbrough 10 38 M6 A1(M) 37 Harrogate York 63 M65 Bradford Leeds Beverley M6 28 M62 Wakefield Wigan 16 27 Huddersfield Birkenhead Liverpool Manchester Barnsley M62 Scunthorpe 35 36Stockport Doncaster Rotherham Sheffield GB_Landkarte.indd 162 05.11.12 12:44 Great Britain 163 GPS Nr.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Case
    APPEAL BY MOTO HOSPITALITY LIMITED AGAINST THE DECISION TO REFUSE AN OUTLINE APPLICATION FOR A PROPOSED MOTORWAY SERVICE AREA AT JUNCTION 50 OF THE A1(M) ON LAND COMPRISING FIELD AT 435074 475842, HUTTON CONYERS, RIPON, NORTH YORKSHIRE LPA Ref: 18/02713/EIAMAJ PINS Ref: APP/E2734/W/20/3261729 STATEMENT OF CASE December 2020 Chester Office | Well House Barns | Chester Road | B r e t t o n | C h e s t e r | C H 4 0 D H South Manchester O f f i c e | Camellia House | 76 Water Lane | W i l m s l o w | S K 9 5 B B t 0844 8700 007 | e [email protected] CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND THE APPEAL CONTEXT .................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 The Appeal Context .................................................................................................. 2 2.0 THE CASE FOR APPLEGREEN .............................................................................. 3 2.1 Need ......................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Which MSA Proposal Best Meets the Identified Need and is Preferable ................... 3 3.0 APPLEGREEN’S POSITION IN RESPECT OF THE APPEAL ................................ 6 3.1 Policies / Documents on Which the Appellant Will Rely ............................................ 6 3.2 Topics and Approach ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Highways England | Lateral | 8 City Walk | Leeds | LS11 9AT Tel: +44 (0) 300 4702404 | Mobile: + 44 (0) 7701293885 GTN: 0300 470 2404
    From: Fearnside, Jamey <[email protected]> Sent: 05 October 2018 13:45 To: Planning Consultations Attachments: 679066.AE.18.36.18 TM001 Final.pdf; 18 00123 EIAMAJ .pdf F.A.O Planning Officer Thank you for your application dated 14th September 2018. I have reviewed the details of the application and at this stage, there is further work required in order to determine the impact this application would have on the safety and operation of the strategic road network. As such, a notice of none determination has been placed on this application for a period of 6 months, until 5th April 2019, or until all information is received and a full review can be carried out. I have provided a technical review, which is attached and a summary of this is as follows: This review has highlighted the need for further information: 1) Parking is based upon busiest month, however, it should be demonstrated that the busiest month is in fact July, based upon the number of missing survey days within July and other months. 2) The parking provision generally complies to Cir 02/13, however the number of caravan / motorhome / vehicle with trailer spaces available for disabled users should be increased to 2. 3) It should be demonstrated that the inclusion of committed developments would not materially change the assessments. In addition to the above, it should be noted that the CTMP should be conditioned on any approval such that it is produced and agreed before construction starts and then implemented throughout the construction period. Once final layouts have been determined these should be subject to a design standards check and subsequently a Stage 1 RSA.
    [Show full text]
  • Commissioning and Managing the West Midlands Railway West Midlands Rail Proposition and Business Case October 2014
    Commissioning and Managing the West Midlands Railway West Midlands Rail Proposition and Business case October 2014 West Midlands Raiaill The WMR Proposition Contents Preface 1. Why Local? 7 2. Supporting Devolution 9 3. Our Strategies and Policies 10 4. Supporting Economic Growth 12 5. Re-mapping the Network 14 6. Accountable, Capable Governance 19 7. What We Want to Do 22 8. The Financial Structure 25 9. Renewal and enhancement 27 10. Working with Our Stakeholders 29 11. Procurement and Programme 31 12. Managing the Risks of Change 33 13. Five Stage Business Case Summary 35 The Business Case Contents Appendices 1. OVERVIEW Introduction 38 The West Midlands Devolution Proposition 38 The Strategic Case 39 The Economic Case 40 The Financial Case 40 The Commercial Case 41 The Management Case 41 2. THE STRATEGIC CASE Policy Context 42 Problems and Opportunities 48 Devolution Objectives 51 Measures for Success 51 Scope of Devolution 55 Alternative Strategic Options Considered 62 Conclusion 68 3. THE ECONOMIC CASE Introduction 69 Cost Impacts 69 Benefit Opportunities 70 Value for Money 72 Conclusion 79 4. THE FINANCIAL CASE Cost and Revenue Changes 80 Financial Scale of the Proposition 84 Funding Requirements 87 Financial Risk 88 Conclusion 91 5. THE COMMERCIAL CASE Introduction 92 Contractual Framework 92 Procurement 93 Approach to Developing an Output Specification 94 Conclusion 98 6. THE MANAGEMENT CASE Governance 99 Managing the Franchise 103 Conclusion 106 Appendices A Local Transport Plan Objectives 108 B Devolution Case Studies 115 C
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Monitoring Report 2009/10
    Annual Monitoring Report 2009/10 Annual Monitoring Report 2009/10 Annual Monitoring Report 2009/10 Contents Executive Summary 2 1 Introduction 5 2 Stafford Borough Spatial Portrait 7 3 Contextual Indicators 14 4 Implementation of the Local Development Scheme (LDS) 26 5 Key Elements of the Local Development Framework 29 6 Achievement of Policies in Local Development Documents 30 7 Monitoring Indicators 31 8 National Core Indicators 33 9 Existing Stafford Borough Local Plan Policies to be Monitored 35 10 Core Output Indicators 38 Business Development 38 Housing 42 Minerals and Waste 52 Environmental Quality 52 11 Significant Effect Indicators 62 12 Implications of changing or new National and Regional Policy 78 13 Conclusions 80 AMR Appendices Appendix 1: Local Development Framework Glossary 81 Appendix 2: Monitoring of Local Development Framework 82 2 Annual Monitoring Report 2009/10 Executive Summary Executive Summary The Stafford Borough Annual Monitoring Report 2009/10 covers the period 1st April 2009 to 31st March 2010. The purpose of the Annual Monitoring Report (AMR) is to: Monitor Core Output indicators as prescribed within Government guidance; Assess whether national and local indicators have been achieved; Monitor progress of planning policy preparation and production within Local Development Documents (LDDs) in accordance with the adopted Local Development Scheme (LDS), including the monitoring of existing local plan policies and whether they are still fit for purpose; and Consider how growth is being delivered in accordance with the Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS). Key Issues from the Annual Monitoring Report 2009/10: During the first quarter of the period 1st April 2009 to 31st March 2010 good progress was made preparing the Local Development Framework and the Core Strategy Development Plan Document with two key consultation events.
    [Show full text]
  • Stafford & Surrounds Clinical Commissioning Group Governing Body Meeting to Be Held on Monday 15
    Enc 00 Stafford & Surrounds Clinical Commissioning Group Governing Body Meeting To be held on Monday 15th April 2013, 14:30 – 17:00 Stafford Gatehouse Theatre, Stafford AGENDA A=Approval D=Decision I=Information Enc Lead A/D/I 1 Welcome by the Chair MJ 2 Apologies for Absence MJ 3 Conflicts of Interests MJ I Presentation of Register of Members Enc 01 SY I Interests 4 Minutes of the last meeting : • Unconfirmed minutes of the Governing Body held 4th February Enc 02 MJ A 2013 • Matters arising Enc 03 5 Chair of the Governing Body Verbal MJ I 6 Chief Officer Report Enc 04 AD A/D • Transition and Capacity • Conflict of Interest • Individual Funding Request Policy • 111 Update • Government Initial Response to Mid Staffordshire Public Inquiry • CCG Response to the Monitor review • Conversation Staffordshire • Local Health Quality Premium Enc 00 Scheme 7 Quality Report Enc 05 VJ A 8 Follow up to Francis Report Verbal VJ I 9 Finance & Performance • Finance Report –Month 11 Enc 06 AC I • Finance Plan 2013/14 Enc 07 AC A (Presentation) • Performance Report-February 2013 Enc 08 AC I 10 Everyone Counts-Plans for 2013/14 Enc 09 AB A 11 Innovation Plan Verbal PM I 12 Items for Information VJ I • Joint Quality Committee Minutes Enc 10 13 Any Other Business • Governing Body meetings in public Enc 11 MJ 14 Questions from the public 15 Date of Next Meeting : Monday 20th May 2013 14:30 (venue tbc) Item 3 Enc 01 STAFFORD & SURROUNDS CCG GOVERNING BODY - DECLARATION OF INTERESTS REGISTER November 2012 Member Position Interest Margaret Jones Chair Partner in Penkridge Medical Practice, Pinfold Lane, Penkridge, ST19 5AP.
    [Show full text]
  • Post Opening Project Evaluation M1 J10-13 HSR & Junctions
    Post Opening Project Evaluation M1 J10-13 HSR & Junctions One Year After Study October 2016 Notice Although this report was commissioned by Highways England, the findings and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Highways England. While Highways England has made every effort to ensure the information in this document is accurate, Highways England does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of that information; and it cannot accept liability for any loss or damages of any kind resulting from reliance on the information or guidance this document contains. Post Opening Project Evaluation M1 J10-13 HSR and Junctions: One Year After Study Foreword Highways England’s motorways are some of the safest in the world. Our road network carries a third of road traffic and we have seen demand grow by a quarter since 2000 with continued growth forecast. One reason for the introduction is smart motorways is because there are more vehicles on the road. By making use of the full width of the road, smart motorways add that extra capacity to carry more vehicles and ease congestion. They have evolved from Controlled Motorways (with variable speed limits) to Dynamic Hard Shoulder Running (opening the hard shoulder as a running lane to traffic at busy periods) to All Lane Running (permanently removing the hard shoulder and converting it into a running lane). Compared to a traditional motorway widening they deliver: • Increased capacity at significantly less cost than traditional motorway widening. • New technology and variable speed limits to improve traffic flow.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Case Team We Write on Behalf of Applegreen Plc Pursuant To
    From: M42 Junction 6 Cc: Subject: RE: TR010027: M42 Junction 6 Improvement - Applegreen plc Deadline 3 Submissions Date: 15 July 2019 17:16:35 Attachments: Applegreen DL3 submissions - final.pdf Technical Note on Free Flow Junction Alternative for M42 J5a - final.pdf Appendices A-E to Applegreens D3 Submissions.zip Dear Case Team We write on behalf of Applegreen plc pursuant to Deadline 3 for the examination of the above project. Our registration identification number is 20022311. Our Deadline 3 submissions comprise: A document titled Applegreen DL 3 Submissions. This comprises 3 tables (in a single file) as follows: Table 1: Comments on the Applicant’s responses (Document 8.6) to the Panel’s first written questions Table 2: Comments on the Applicant’s Document 8.24: Junction 5A Operational Assessment Table 3: Comments on the Extra MSA Group’s responses to the Panel’s first written questions A ZIP folder containing 5 Appendices (A-E) to the above submissions. A Technical Note on the Free Flow Junction Alternative for J5A. We trust that is all in order. Finally, we would be grateful for confirmation of receipt of this email. Regards,​ Nick Roberts Director [email protected] T: 0844 8700 007* | | F: 01244 661 432 Camellia House, 76 Water Lane, Wilmslow, Cheshire, SK9 5BB www.axisped.co.uk #SigApplied ​ Disclaimer: Axis shall not be liable for any loss caused from reliance on the contents, or due to any errors, bugs viruses or malicious code. Any enclosure with this content should be checked for viruses before it is opened. The company cannot be held responsible for any failure by the recipient to test for viruses before opening any enclosures.
    [Show full text]
  • Ripon Motorway Service Area Planning Statement
    RCD02 Ripon Motorway Service Area Planning Statement Contents 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Motorway Service Areas in the UK 3.0 The Need for an MSA at Ripon 4.0 Site Description and Surrounding Area 5.0 The Proposed Ripon MSA 6.0 The Development Plan, National and Other Policy 7.0 The Planning Assessment & The Planning Balance 8.0 The 2012 Planning Appeal 9.0 Conclusion Collins & Coward 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 This Planning Statement is submitted as part of a planning application package by Moto Hospitality Limited (“Moto”) for a new Motorway Service Area (“MSA”) at Junction 50 of the A1(M) Motorway. The new MSA will be known as “Ripon”. This is because the nearest significant city to the proposed MSA is Ripon which lies to the south west of the A1(M) motorway. 1.2 The planning application is submitted as a hybrid application. The application contains all the appropriate and necessary detail to enable the Council to make a determination with the certainty that the MSA will be delivered in accordance with the package of information supplied with the application. 1.3 The site extends to 13.35 hectares (33 acres). 1.4 The new Ripon MSA will provide an Amenity Building, 100 bed Lodge, Fuel Filling Station, Drive Thru Coffee Unit, parking for all classes of vehicles, landscape, and amenity areas. 1.5 The relevant parking facilities comprise: Vehicle Parking type Spaces provided Amenity building and lodge parking 377 Motorcycle parking 14 Service yard parking (staff allocated) 13 Fuel filling station parking 8 HGV 67 Coaches 13 Caravans 8 Abnormal load 1 1.6 Moto has engaged in pre-application discussions with Harrogate Borough Council and relevant statutory consultees including Highways England.
    [Show full text]
  • Pick up Points
    Pick Up Points Please note pick up times will be confirmed with your final joining details. Please note not all pickup points will run on every tour. Abercynon Ampthill Bakewell Aberdare Andover Baldock Aberdeen Annan Baldock Services (A1(M)) Aberdeen (ABZ) Annandale Water Services Banbury (A74(M)) Abergavenny Bangor Arbroath Abergele Banstead Armthorpe Abingdon Bargoed Arnold Abington Services (M74) Barking Arundel Accrington Barnet Ashbourne Acle Barnetby Top Services Ashburton (M180) Adlington Ashby-de-la-Zouch Barnoldswick Alcester Ashford Barnsley Alcester Oversley Mill Services (A46) Ashington Barnstaple Aldershot Ashton-in-Makerfield Barrow-in-Furness Aldridge Ashton-under-Lyne Barry Alfreton Aspatria Barton-le-Clay Alnwick Astley Barton-upon-Humber Alsager Atherstone Basildon Alton Atherton Basingstoke Altrincham Attleborough Bath Amble Audenshaw Batley Ambleside Axminster Battle Amersham Aylesbury Bawtry Amesbury Countess Ayr Beaconsfield Services (A303) Bembridge Beaconsfield Services Amesbury Solstice Park (M40) Britannia Grand Burstin Services (A303) Bebington Britannia Grand Ammanford Pont Abraham Scarborough Beccles Services (M4) Pick Up Points Please note pick up times will be confirmed with your final joining details. Please note not all pickup points will run on every tour. Beckenham Birmingham Bourne Bedford Birmingham (BHX) Bournemouth Bedlington Birtley Bournemouth (BOH) Bedworth Bishop Auckland Brackley Beeston Bishop's Cleeve Bracknell Belfast (BFS) Bishop's Stortford Bradford Belper Bradford-on-Avon Birchanger Green
    [Show full text]
  • Overnight HGV Parking in Thurrock, November 2010
    Overnight HGV Parking in Thurrock November 2010 CONTENTS 1. Introduction Page 3 2. Background Page 3 3. Existing Situation Page 5 4. Future Demand Page 9 5. Conclusions and Recommendations Page 10 APPENDICES 1. Details of Lorry Parks and MSAs 2. Parking Survey Results 3. Collin Buchanan Email 2 OVERNIGHT HGV PARKING IN THURROCK 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The purpose of this report is to collate all available information on existing overnight HGV parking in Thurrock and future demands. This report will also provide an evidence base for use in the preparation of Local Development Framework (LDF) documents. 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 Thurrock has a significant level of roadside overnight parking due to: • Thurrock’s location in relation to the main crossings to Europe. HGV drivers leaving the ferry ports in Kent and heading to the Midlands or the North of England may have taken their 45 minute rest on the ferry, used probably up to an hour driving off the ferry, through customs and out of the port. The Dartford Crossing is then some 2-2.5 hours driving time from the ports. Delays at the Crossing may mean that the drivers are forced to take another break or an overnight stop around the area of the Crossing. Inevitably, therefore, drivers mat be looking to stop in and around Thurrock. • The high number of industrial and port-related businesses in the borough. There is a concentration of depots and industrial sites in the borough. Many HGV drivers plan to be as close to their destinations the night before to ensure they are at the front of the queue to deliver or pick up their loads the following morning.
    [Show full text]
  • Fax 01543 462317 |
    Please ask for: Steve Partridge Your Ref: Extension No: 4588 My Ref: E-Mail: [email protected] 18 March, 2016 Dear Councillor, CABINET 4.00 PM ON THURSDAY, 24 MARCH, 2016 ESPERANCE ROOM, CIVIC CENTRE, CANNOCK You are invited to attend this meeting for consideration of the matters itemised in the following Agenda. Yours sincerely, T. McGovern, Managing Director To: Councillors: G. Adamson Leader of the Council G. Alcott Deputy Leader of the Council and Economic Development and Planning Portfolio Leader A. Lovell Corporate Improvement Portfolio Leader C. Bennett Crime and Partnerships Portfolio Leader Mrs. C. Mitchell Culture and Sport Portfolio Leader A. Dudson Environment Portfolio Leader Mrs. M.A. Davis Health and Wellbeing Portfolio Leader F.W.C. Allen Housing Portfolio Leader Mrs. D.M. Todd Town Centre Regeneration Portfolio Leader Civic Centre, PO Box 28, Beecroft Road, Cannock, Staffordshire WS11 1BG tel 01543 462621 | fax 01543 462317 | www.cannockchasedc.gov.uk Search for ‘Cannock Chase Life’ @CannockChaseDC AMENDED AGENDA (ADDITIONAL ITEM) PART 1 1. Apologies 2. Declarations of Interests of Members in Contracts and Other Matters and Restriction on Voting by Members To declare any personal, pecuniary or disclosable pecuniary interests in accordance with the Code of Conduct and any possible contraventions under Section 106 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992. 3. Updates from Portfolio Leaders To receive and consider oral updates (if any), from the Leader of the Council, the Deputy Leader and Portfolio Leaders. 4. Minutes To approve the Minutes of the meeting held on 1 February, 2016 (enclosed). 5. Forward Plan Forward Plan of Decisions: March to May, 2016 (Item 5.1 – 5.2).
    [Show full text]