DOCSLIB.ORG

Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Volume 1 - Report June 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Volume 1 - Report June 2014 South Staffordshire, Cannock Chase, Lichfield & Stafford Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Volume 1 - Report June 2014 Quality Management Job No CS069598 Title South Staffordshire, Cannock Chase, Lichfield & Stafford Level 1 SFRA Update Location South Staffordshire Council Document Ref N/A Issue / Revision Final (Version 2) Date 19th June 2014 Prepared by Jane Tingay Signature (for file) Checked by Louise Tattersall Signature (for file) Authorised by Steve Thompsett Signature (for file) Revision Status Rev Date Issue / Purpose/ Comment Prepared Checked Authorised Draft 28/02/2014 Issue draft for comment JT LT ST Final 30/04/2014 Final JT LT ST Final 19/06/2014 Final (Version 2) JT - ST This document and related appendices have been updated on behalf of South Staffordshire, Cannock Chase Council, Lichfield District Council & Stafford Borough Council by: Quays Office Park, Conference Avenue, Portishead, BS20 7LZ. Tel 01275 840 840 www.capita.co.uk Contents GLOSSARY ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 10 1.1 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................................... 10 1.2 SFRA AIMS .............................................................................................................................................. 10 1.3 SFRA OBJECTIVES...................................................................................................................................... 11 1.4 SFRA DELIVERABLES .................................................................................................................................. 11 1.5 SFRA STRUCTURE ...................................................................................................................................... 12 2. PLANNING CONTEXT .............................................................................................................................. 13 2.1 PLANNING POLICY FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................................... 13 2.2 EUROPEAN (EU) POLICIES............................................................................................................................ 13 2.3 NATIONAL PLANNING POLICIES ..................................................................................................................... 17 2.4 LOCAL PLANNING POLICIES .......................................................................................................................... 19 2.5 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN PHASE 1 & 2 ....................................................................................... 23 2.6 PRELIMINARY FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT ......................................................................................................... 24 2.7 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY PLANNING POLICY ..................................................................................................... 25 3. SFRA METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................ 29 3.1 LEVEL 1 – AREA FLOOD SOURCE REVIEW AND SEQUENTIAL TEST ........................................................................ 29 3.2 LEVEL 2 – DEVELOPMENT SITE ASSESSMENTS FOR EXCEPTION TESTING ................................................................ 29 3.3 DATA COLLECTION ..................................................................................................................................... 30 3.4 SFRA MAPS ............................................................................................................................................. 30 4. FLOOD RISK ............................................................................................................................................ 36 4.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 36 4.2 SUMMARY OF FLOOD RISK IN CANNOCK CHASE ............................................................................................... 36 4.3 SUMMARY OF FLOOD RISK IN LICHFIELD DISTRICT COUNCIL ............................................................................... 37 4.4 SUMMARY OF FLOOD RISK IN SOUTH STAFFORDSHIRE ....................................................................................... 40 4.5 SUMMARY OF FLOOD RISK IN STAFFORD BOROUGH COUNCIL ............................................................................. 42 5. HOW TO USE THE SFRA IN LOCAL PLANNING ......................................................................................... 45 5.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 45 5.2 SEQUENTIAL TEST ...................................................................................................................................... 45 5.3 EXCEPTION TEST ........................................................................................................................................ 51 5.4 CLIMATE CHANGE ...................................................................................................................................... 53 6. GUIDANCE FOR DEVELOPERS ................................................................................................................. 55 6.1 FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENTS (FRAS) ............................................................................................................... 55 6.2 CONSULTATION WITH THE ENVIRONMENT AGENCY ........................................................................................... 57 6.3 CONSULTATION WITH THE LEAD LOCAL AUTHORITIES ........................................................................................ 57 6.4 CONSULTATION WITH SEVERN TRENT WATER .................................................................................................. 57 6.5 CONSULTATION WITH CANAL & RIVER TRUST .................................................................................................. 58 6.6 SUGGESTED FLOOD RESILIENT CONSTRUCTION ................................................................................................ 58 7. FLOOD WARNING SYSTEMS AND FLOOD MANAGEMENT MEASURES .................................................... 60 7.1 FLOOD DEFENCES, STORAGE AREAS & RESIDUAL RISK ...................................................................................... 60 7.2 FLOOD WARNING ...................................................................................................................................... 65 7.3 FLOOD & EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN ......................................................................................................... 68 8. GUIDANCE FOR APPLICATION OF SUDS .................................................................................................. 71 8.1 WHAT ARE SUDS? ..................................................................................................................................... 71 8.2 SUDS POLICIES ......................................................................................................................................... 71 3 8.3 ACHIEVING SUDS IN DEVELOPMENTS ............................................................................................................ 74 8.4 SUDS TECHNIQUES .................................................................................................................................... 74 8.5 SUDS DESIGN ........................................................................................................................................... 77 8.6 WHERE CAN SUDS BE UTILISED .................................................................................................................... 77 8.7 SUDS CONSTRAINTS ................................................................................................................................... 79 8.8 GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY ................................................................................................................... 79 9. POLICY GUIDANCE AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................................... 81 9.1 FLOOD RISK OBJECTIVE 1: TO SEEK FLOOD RISK REDUCTION THROUGH SPATIAL PLANNING AND SITE DESIGN ............. 82 9.2 FLOOD RISK OBJECTIVE 2: REDUCE SURFACE WATER RUNOFF ............................................................................ 83 9.3 FLOOD RISK OBJECTIVE 3: TO SUPPORT RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLANNING AND WATER FRAMEWORK DELIVERY .. 84 9.4 FLOOD RISK OBJECTIVE 4: TO PROTECT AND PROMOTE AREAS FOR FUTURE FLOOD ALLEVIATION SCHEMES ................ 84 9.5 FLOOD RISK OBJECTIVE 5: TO IMPROVE FLOOD AWARENESS AND EMERGENCY PLANNING ....................................... 85 9.6 FLOOD RISK OBJECTIVE 6: TO PREVENT NEW DEVELOPMENT WITHIN SENSITIVE DEVELOPMENT LOCATIONS .................. 85 9.7 RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................................................. 86 9.8 SITE ALLOCATION CONSIDERATION ...............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Black Country Urban Park Barometer
    3333333 Black Country Urban Park Barometer April 2013 DRAFT WORK IN PROGRESS Welcome to the Black Country Urban Park Barometer. Transformation of the Environmental Infrastructure is one of the key to drivers identified in the Black Country Strategy for Growth and Competitiveness. The full report looks at the six themes created under the ‘Urban Park’ theme and provides a spatial picture of that theme accompanied with the key assets and opportunities for that theme. Foreword to be provided by Roger Lawrence The Strategic Context Quality of the Black Country environment is one of the four primary objectives of the Black Country Vision that has driven the preparation of the Black Country Strategy for Growth and Competitiveness through the Black Country Study process. The environment is critical to the health and well-being of future residents, workers and visitors to the Black Country. It is also both a major contributor to, and measure of, wider goals for sustainable development and living as well as being significantly important to the economy of the region. The importance and the desire for transforming the Black Country environment has been reinforced through the evidence gathering and analysis of the Black Country Study process as both an aspiration in its own right and as a necessity to achieve economic prosperity. Evidence from the Economic and Housing Studies concluded that ‘the creation of new environments will be crucial for attracting investment from high value-added firms’ and similarly that ‘a high quality healthy environment is a priority for ‘knowledge workers’. The Economic Strategy puts ‘Environmental Transformation’ alongside Education & Skills as the fundamental driver to achieve Black Country economic renaissance and prosperity for its people.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF995, Job 6
    The Wildlife Trust for Birmingham and the Black Country _____________________________________________________________ The Endless Village Revisited Technical Background December 2005 Protecting Wildlife for the Future The Endless Village Revisited Technical Background 2005 The Wildlife Trust for Birmingham and the Black Country gratefully acknowledges support from English Nature, Dudley MBC, Sandwell MBC, Walsall MBC and Wolverhampton City Council. This Report was compiled by: Dr Ellen Pisolkar MSc IEEM The Endless Village Revisited Technical Background 2005 The Endless Village Revisited Technical Background 2005 Contents Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 3. SITES 4 3.1 Introduction 4 3.2 Birmingham 3.2.1 Edgbaston Reservoir 5 3.2.2 Moseley Bog 11 3.2.3 Queslett Quarry 17 3.2.4 Spaghetti Junction 22 3.2.5 Swanshurst Park 26 3.3 Dudley 3.3.1 Castle Hill 30 3.3.2 Doulton’s Claypit/Saltwells Wood 34 3.3.3 Fens Pools 44 3.4 Sandwell 3.4.1 Darby’s Hill Rd and Darby’s Hill Quarry 50 3.4.2 Sandwell Valley 54 3.4.3 Sheepwash Urban Park 63 3.5 Walsall 3.5.1 Moorcroft Wood 71 3.5.2 Reedswood Park 76 3.5 3 Rough Wood 81 3.6 Wolverhampton 3.6.1 Northycote Farm 85 3.6.2 Smestow Valley LNR (Valley Park) 90 3.6.3 West Park 97 4. HABITATS 101 The Endless Village Revisited Technical Background 2005 4.1 Introduction 101 4.2 Heathland 103 4.3 Canals 105 4.4 Rivers and Streams 110 4.5 Waterbodies 115 4.6 Grassland 119 4.7 Woodland 123 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Water Resources Management Plan
    Draft Water Resources Management Plan Statement of Response – Appendix C Prepared by the Water Resources Strategy Team 03 September 2018 Appendix C: Consultation comments and our response During the consultation stage of our draft WRMP, we received comments from a total of 22 organisations and stakeholders. We acknowledge and appreciate the time that these parties have provided to input into the development of our WRMP and we have endeavoured to respond to every observation, request and clarification that has been provided to us. In order to provide a clear line of sight between the comments made by our consultees and our response, we have prepare this Appendix to: Demonstrate the comments that our consultees raised during the consultation period. Support navigation of the Statement of Response document and associated Appendix A and Appendix B. Provide visible assurance that we have given due regard, and prepared a response, for all comments that we received during the consultation. The Table in this Appendix lists all consultation comments that we received. The list is sorted alphabetically by organisation name. In the Table we have abbreviated organisation names in accordance with the following key. We notice that some of the responding consultees also use abbreviations that may be unfamiliar to other organisations. As such, we have provided a glossary of terms to assist understanding of this document. We received consultation comments from the following organisations: Notation in Appendix C Organisation C&RT Canal & Rivers Trust
    [Show full text]
  • A Cornerstone of the Historical Landscape
    Stourbridge's Western Boundary: A cornerstone of the historical landscape by K James BSc(Hons) MSc PhD FIAP (email: [email protected]) The present-day administrative boundaries around Stourbridge are the result of a long and complex series of organizational changes, land transfers and periods of settlement, invasion and warfare dating back more than two thousand years. Perhaps the most interesting section of the boundary is that to the west of Stourbridge which currently separates Dudley Metropolitan Borough from Kinver in Staffordshire. This has been the county boundary for a millennium, and its course mirrors the outline of the medieval manors of Oldswinford and Pedmore; the Domesday hundred of Clent; Anglo-Saxon royal estates, the Norman forest of Kinver and perhaps the 7th-9th century Hwiccan kingdom as well as post-Roman tribal territories. The boundary may even have its roots in earlier (though probably more diffuse) frontiers dating back to prehistoric times. Extent and Description As shown in figure 1, the boundary begins at the southern end of County Lane near its junction with the ancient road (now just a rough public footpath) joining Iverley to Ounty John Lane. It follows County Lane north-north-west, crosses the A451 and then follows the line of Sandy Lane (now a bridleway) to the junction of Sugar Loaf Lane and The Broadway. Along with County Lane, this section of Sandy Lane lies upon a first-century Roman road that connected Droitwich (Salinae) to the Roman encampments at Greensforge near Ashwood. Past Sugar Loaf Lane, the line of the boundary diverges by a few degrees to the east of the Roman road, which continues on in a straight line under the fields of Staffordshire towards Newtown Bridge and Prestwood.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Village News Hamstall Ridware Parish Magazine June
    Your Village News Hamstall Ridware Parish Magazine And further History of Hamstall Team Teddy competing in the Easter Egg hunt. Photo, with permissison, Wendy Mepsted June - July 2021 http://www2.lichfielddc.gov.uk/hamstallridware/ www.hrpc.btck.co.uk https://www.achurchnearyou.com/church/4451/ https://www.facebook.com/groups/hamstallridware Contact Information Rector Revd Jeremy Brading 01543 472565 The Rectory, Savey Lane, Yoxall, DE13 8PD. [email protected] Reader Mrs Kate Beechey 01543 493556 Churchwardens Mr John Ferguson 01889 504430 Mr Michael Elsom 07949 126640 PCC Secretary Mrs Jean Mead 01889 504332 Parish Magazine Editor Dr Paul Carter 01889 504347 [email protected] Other PCC members Liz Carter Chris Smart Doug Cook David Rudge Sarah Elsom Jude Preston Safeguarding of children and vulnerable adults. If you have any concerns please speak in complete confidence to the Parish Safeguarding Officer Dr Paul Carter (01889 504 347) or the Diocesan Safeguarding Adviser Mr Neil Spiring 01543 306030 UNITED BENEFICE OF KINGS BROMLEY, THE RIDWARES and YOXALL Usual Services Rota: Everyone welcome at any of our services All as permitted by current Covid regulations Hamstall Kings Bromley Mavesyn Yoxall Ridware All Saints Ridware St Peter St Michael and St Nicholas All Angels 1st Sunday 10.30am 10.00 in Month Holy Holy Communion Communion 2nd Sunday 10.00am 10.00am in Month Holy Holy Communion Communion 3rd Sunday 10.30pm 10.00am in Month Holy Morning Service Communion 4th Sunday 10.00am 10.00am in Month Holy Holy Communion Communion
    [Show full text]
  • Sow and Penk Internal Drainage Board (IDB) BAP Area Monitoring
    Sow and Penk Internal Drainage Board (IDB) BAP area monitoring River Sow floodplain ©Matt Jones Baseline monitoring February 2016 Introduction The IDB has a direct capacity to exercise control over a number of watercourses within the Sow and Penk area (see Map 1), it is therefore of principal importance to suitably monitor the effect of work carried out on IDB maintained watercourses to assess its impact on the biodiversity of the wider riparian environment. To effectively monitor ecological systems in order to develop and deliver beneficial policies and practices, baseline data must be gathered to provide a benchmark to measure fluctuations in habitats or species populations over time (OECD, 2001), particularly in relation to appropriate habitat management and reducing biodiversity loss. Staffordshire Wildlife Trust has been commissioned to monitor the extent of Water vole Arvicola amphibious and Flowering-rush Butomus umbellatus to help the IDB fulfil its duty conserve biodiversity. Current baseline data A desktop study was carried out using Staffordshire Ecological Records (SER) ecological records database to output all existing records of Flowering-rush B. umbellatus and European Water Vole A. amphibious within the Sow and Penk IDB Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) area. The current available data originates from a number of sources and surveys, notably records from structured surveys and monitoring including, but not limited to Staffordshire Mammal Group surveys, structured surveys carried out by Staffordshire Wildlife Trust and surveys undertaken as part of the data collection for the Flora of Staffordshire (Hawksford, et al., 2011). This data will form a primary baseline from which data collected through future surveys can be compared to monitor populations of A.
    [Show full text]
  • ·Ct7ttlestonb .Btl.NDBED • • .PENKR.IDGE UNIQN Comprises the '21 P'lll"Ishes .Ood Townships Of
    ·Ct7TTLESTONB .Btl.NDBED • • .PENKR.IDGE UNIQN comprises the '21 p'lll"ishes .ood townships of ..:Actou-with-Bednall, 81-ewood, Bashbury3 Cannock, Cheslyn-Hay.. Churok­ Eaton, OoppenhaU, DuD.StQn, Essington, Featherstone, Hatherton, Hilto~ HQJltington, Kinv.aston, Lapley, Norton-Canes, Penkridge, Sar.edon, Shares­ hill, Stretton, and Great Wyrley. Its registm!Uu. ailltricl ~omprises also the ~xtra-paroohhll place i.lalk>d Teddesley Hay, and in 1841 contained 1-6.07 -i iwhabUants, of whom t:l228 were males and 7846 females, living in :3!42 hot.tse.$, besides which the;re were 131 uninhabited houses, aoo ten building, when the census was taken in that year. The Union W01·klwuse is an old building at BBEWOOD, but x~eeived. such additions between 1838 and 1842 as have rendered it capable of accommodating 200 inmates. It has • well-propo;rtiQned ooard-room, and very comfortable hospital wards. The Guardians meet on alternate Thursdays, at 11 o'clock. The manage­ ment of the Union is celebrated for its admirable blending of economy and liberality ; and in 1850, the Poor Law Inspector of the district informed the Guardians that out of 38 Unions under his inspection, Penkridge had the smallest amount of taxation per acre, and gave the largest average amount cl relief to individual paupers. The cost of relieving the poor was £3719 in 1846; £!363 in 18-18; and £3956 iu 1850. The Union embraces an 11rea of 94 square miles, and the gross annual value .of its rateable property is about £110,000, so that its poor rates have averaged less than 9d.
    [Show full text]
  • Yoxall to the National Memorial Arboretum
    This leaflet can be used in conjunction with The National Forest Way OS Explorer 245 (The National Forest) The National Forest Way takes walkers on a 75-mile journey through a transforming Stage 12: landscape, from the National Memorial Arboretum in Staffordshire to Beacon Hill Country Park in Leicestershire. Yoxall to the On the way, you will discover the area’s evolution from a rural landscape, through Start National Memorial industrialisation and its decline, to the modern-day creation of a new forest, where 21st-century life is threaded through a mosaic End Arboretum of green spaces and settlements. Length: 5 miles / 8 kilometres The trail leads through young and ancient woodlands, market towns and the industrial heritage of this changing landscape. Burton upon Trent About this stage Swadlincote Start: Yoxall (DE13 8NQ) Ashby End: National Memorial Arboretum (DE13 7AR) de la Zouch Coalville On this stage, the route is never far from the River Swarbourn. You will enjoy views over the Trent Valley towards Lichfield with its prominent cathedral, passing through young woodlands and open river meadows. Visit the villages of Yoxall and Alrewas and the National Memorial Arboretum, a place of reflection and The National Forest Way was created by a remembrance. partnership of the National Forest Company, Derbyshire County Council, Leicestershire County Council and Staffordshire County The National Forest Company Council, with the generous Bath Yard, Moira, Swadlincote, support of Fisher German. Derbyshire DE12 6BA Telephone: 01283 551211 Enquiries: www.nationalforestway.co.uk/contact Website: www.nationalforest.org To find out more, visit: Photos: Jacqui Rock, Christopher Beech and www.nationalforestway.co.uk Martin Vaughan Maps reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the Local Boundary Commission for England Further Electoral Review of Staffordshire Stage 1 Consultation
    Submission to the Local Boundary Commission for England Further Electoral Review of Staffordshire Stage 1 Consultation Proposals for a new pattern of divisions Produced by Peter McKenzie, Richard Cressey and Mark Sproston Contents 1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................1 2 Approach to Developing Proposals.........................................................................1 3 Summary of Proposals .............................................................................................2 4 Cannock Chase District Council Area .....................................................................4 5 East Staffordshire Borough Council area ...............................................................9 6 Lichfield District Council Area ...............................................................................14 7 Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council Area ....................................................18 8 South Staffordshire District Council Area.............................................................25 9 Stafford Borough Council Area..............................................................................31 10 Staffordshire Moorlands District Council Area.....................................................38 11 Tamworth Borough Council Area...........................................................................41 12 Conclusions.............................................................................................................45
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Management Plan Phase 1
    Southern Staffordshire Surface Water Management Plan Phase 1 Stafford Borough, Lichfield District, Tamworth Borough, South Staffordshire District and Cannock Chase District Councils July 2010 Final Report 9V5955 CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 General Overview 1 1.2 Objectives of the SWMP 1 1.3 Scope of the SWMP 3 1.3.1 Phase 1 - Preparation 5 1.3.2 Phase 2 - Risk Assessment 5 2 ESTABLISHING A PARTNERSHIP 7 2.1 Identification of Partners 7 2.2 Roles and Responsibilities 9 2.3 Engagement Plan 10 2.4 Objectives 10 3 COLLATE AND MAP INFORMATION 11 3.1 Data Collection and Quality 11 3.1.1 Historic Flood Event Data 12 3.1.2 Future Flood Risk Data 15 3.2 Mapping and GIS 18 3.2.1 Surface Water Flooding 18 3.2.2 Flood Risk Assets 19 3.2.3 SUDS Map 19 3.2.4 Summary Sheets 20 4 STAFFORD BOROUGH 23 4.1 Surface Water Flood Risk 23 4.2 Surface Water Management 24 4.3 Recommendations 25 5 LICHFIELD DISTRICT 27 5.1 Surface Water Flood Risk 27 5.2 Surface Water Management 28 5.2.1 Canal Restoration 29 5.3 Recommendations 31 6 TAMWORTH BOROUGH 33 6.1 Surface Water Flood Risk 33 6.2 Surface Water Management 34 6.3 Recommendations 35 7 SOUTH STAFFORDSHIRE DISTRICT 37 7.1 Surface Water Flood Risk 37 7.2 Surface Water Management 38 7.2.1 Canal Restoration 39 7.3 Recommendations 41 Southern Staffordshire SWMP Phase 1 9V5955/R00003/303671/Soli Final Report -i- July 2010 8 CANNOCK CHASE DISTRICT 43 8.1 Surface Water Flood Risk 43 8.2 Surface Water Management 44 8.2.1 Canal Restoration 45 8.3 Recommendations 47 9 SELECTION OF AN APPROACH FOR FURTHER ANALYSIS
    [Show full text]
  • About Broughton & Croxton December 2015 to February 2016
    About Broughton & Croxton December 2015 to February 2016 The Parish Magazine of Broughton and Croxton 1 The Parish Magazine of Broughton and Croxton Editor: Sara Humphries, 12 Martin Dale, Loggerheads, TF9 4DH Tel: 01630 673740 [email protected] Rector: Rev Jonathan Eades, 'The Rectory', Ashley, Market Drayton, Shropshire, TF9 4LQ. Tel: 01630 672210, [email protected] Curate: Rev Doug Heming, Tel: 01630 672430 [email protected] Methodist Minister: Rev John Day, The Old Police House, Croxton Tel: 01630 620671 [email protected] Patrons of the Benefice: The Bishop of Lichfield The Vicar of Eccleshall Mr T. A. J. Hall Parish Links for Contributions: Croxton Church – Mrs Beryl Roe (01630 620248) Broughton Church – Mrs Jean Beasley (01785 850306) Croxton Chapel – Mrs Kath Bridgwood (01630 620601) Your Magazine – Your Community A colour issue of the magazine is now available on the Broughton Church website at www.broughtonchurch.com. Dear Readers I hope you will enjoy this latest edition of ABC and a big thank you to everyone who has contributed to it, from letter and article writers, to advertisers and the people who print it and those who distribute it. This season of peace and goodwill is tinged with sadness because of the ongoing refugee crisis; perhaps you could spare a moment in your busy schedules to spare a thought for those less fortunate and for the plight of so many ordinary and innocent people who have been displaced from their homes and lives. On behalf of the ABC Committee we wish you all a very Happy Christmas and hope that the New Year brings everything you could wish for.
    [Show full text]
  • Lichfield District Local Plan Review Preferred Options
    For Official Use Respondent No: Representation Number: Received: Lichfield District Local Plan Review Preferred Options Please return to Lichfield District Council by 5pm on 24th January 2020, by: Email: [email protected] Post: Spatial Policy and Delivery, Lichfield District Council, District Council House, Frog Lane, Lichfield, WS13 6YZ. This form can also be completed on line using our consultation portal: http://lichfielddc- consult.limehouse.co.uk/portal PLEASE NOTE: This form has two parts: Part A: Personal details. Part B: Your representation(s). Part A: Personal details 1.Personal details1 2 2. Agent’s details (if applicable) Title Mrs First name Anna Last Name Miller Job Title (where relevant) Assistant Director – Growth and Regeneration Organisation (where relevant) Tamworth Borough Council House No./Street Marmion House, Lichfield Street Town Tamworth Post Code B79 7BZ Telephone Number 01827 709709 Email address (where relevant) anna- [email protected] 1 If an agent is being used only the title, name and organisation boxes are necessary but please don’t forget to complete all the Agent’s details. 2 Please note that copies of all comments received will be made available for the public to view, including your address and therefore cannot be treated as confidential. Lichfield District Council will process your personal data in accordance with the Data Protection Act 1998. Our Privacy Notice is at the end of this form. Part B: Your representation Where in the document does your comment relate: Part of document Various – please see below General comments: The Council notes that the proposed new local plan is intended to replace the current local plan strategy (2015) and local plan allocations document (2019).
    [Show full text]