DOCSLIB.ORG

The Standard Volume 1 January 29, 1887

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Standard Volume 1 January 29, 1887 The Standard Volume 1 January 29, 1887 Page 1 Prelates In Politics Growing Indignation Against Corrigan's Political Proceedings St. Stephen's in Revolt—An Enormous Gathering of Irishmen to Hear Michael Davitt Cheers Dr. McGlynn and Hisses Cardinal Simeoni—Further Outrages on St. Stephen's—Police Interfere— Other Priests Removed—A Chorus of Catholic Protest From All Parts of the Country—The Archbishop Boldly Avows His Political Motives The excitement over Archbishop Corrigan's removal of Rev. Dr, McGlynn from the pastorate of St. Stephen's church, so far from dying out, as was confidently predicted, has grown to enormous proportions during the past week, and it has been aggravated and embittered by new outrages on the people of St. Stephen's. Not only has that suffering the congregation been driven by policemen from The church built with its own money, but two store of its priests have been removed and assigned to other parishes. The rising: tide of indignation could no longer be ignored in the archiepiscopal palace, and the archbishop attempted to quiet it by a statement through the newspapers, in which he gave garbled extracts from Dr. McGlynn's letters while publishing; his own in full. This publication caused Dr. McGlynn for the first time to break the silence he has maintained ever since bis suspension, and he made public a brief reply showing that be had strictly obeyed the order sent from Rome by Cardinal Simeoni, commanding him to make no more speeches in behalf of the Irish land league or for the cause of Irish liberation. This, however, but added fuel to the flame, and showed how persistent have been the interferences of the cardinal prefect of propaganda in political matters in this country. It found an immediate echo in the cheers for Dr. McGlynn and the hisses for Cardinal Simeoni at the enormous meeting of Irishmen at Madison square on Sunday evening. Corrigan's Defense An Explicit Declaration that Dr. McGlynn was Suspended Because of His Political Opinions— Dispatches from Rome and Evidently Garbled Letters On the evening of Jan. 21 the reporters of the New York press were summoned to the palace of Archbishop Corrigan, and the following statement handed them, which duly appeared in the daily papers of Jan. 22: New York, Jan. 21, 1887. The press of this city has shown so much courtesy toward me in the painful issue that has engaged much general attention for the past few weeks, that I determined this morning, in view also of other reasons which will appear further on in this communication, to make a simple, straightforward statement of the facts in the case, suck as I know them, without personal feeling and without comment, and this communication is intended to be final. First—In August, 1882, the cardinal prefect of propaganda called attention to the fact that certain speeches reported in the Irish World, and attributed to the Rev. Edward McGlynn, “contained propositions openly opposed to the teachings of the Catholic church,” and requested that the clergy of the diocese in general be desired to abstain from political conflicts. This letter was addressed to me, but as until the death of his eminence Cardinal McCloskey I had no jurisdiction over the regular clergy of this diocese, I referred the matter to his eminence, who went for Dr. McGlynn and had a private interview with him. The cardinal then directed me to say in his name, and as a result of this inter view, that the doctor “recognized his errors, professed due sorrow for them, promised to abstain thenceforth from all similar political meetings whatsoever, and finally requested that the cardinal prefect be duly informed of these resolutions.” A faithful report of the interview was drawn up and read word for word to Cardinal McCloskey, approved by him, and made to propaganda. Second—In September, 1882, before this report had time to reach Rome, a second letter came from Cardinal Simeoni, in the name of the sovereign pontiff, ordering Dr. McGlynn to be suspended a dirinis unless the cardinal archbishop thought best to adopt sonic milder measures. In any event the doctor was to be brought back to wiser counsels and made to desist from his recent course of conduct. This letter was handed to Dr. McGlynn to read and ponder over, so that he might shape his course accordingly. Third—In October, 1882, a third letter came from propaganda containing an expression of joy and consolation that Dr. McGlynn had recognized his errors, and gently insinuating that where a scandal has been public the church desires that a public reparation shall also be made. Fourth—In May, 1883, an additional letter called attention to the fact that Dr. McGlynn had not kept his promises made to bis archbishop, and hence the cardinal was requested to forbid mm from pursuing such a kind of life and making inflammatory speeches. A copy of this letter was communicated to the doctor. At the same time the cardinal archbishop added, May 26, 1883, by way of suggestion, that Dr. McGlynn, if he chose, might take his summer vacation in the form of a trip to Rome, and that have an opportunity of making in person a more satisfactory explanation to the cardinal prefect of propaganda. On June 1, 1883, the doctor replied, declining the proffered trip to Rome, and adding: “I shall henceforth refuse to take any part in any such meeting. Even though it be for charitable objects. Furthermore, on July 1, 1883, he caused to be printed it: the “New York Tablet a statement that “he condemned and repudiated any report or interpretation of any words of his contrary to the doctrines of the Catholic church. In October, 1883, I was sent to Rome to represent Cardinal McCloskey at the conference of American archbishops. During this visit Cardinal Simeoni, alluding to Dr. McGlynn's case, stated that his retraction was not satisfactory. In October, l883, Cardinal McCloskey passed to his reward, and the administration of the diocese was intrusted to me. Fifth—Having resumed the practice of speaking in political gatherings, Dr. McGlynn was gently reminded, Aug. 23, 1886, of the impropriety of such conduct. I do not know if Mr. George's name had been mentioned at that time as a candidate for the mayoralty. At all events, my letter simply deprecated interference in politics in general, without thought or mention of any special party whatsoever. To this admonition Dr. McGlynn made no reply. Sixth—On Sept. 29, he sent. Mr. George to see me. As Dr. McGlynn spoke of Mr. George “as his very dear and valued friend,” I thought, the occasion warranted my informing Mr. George of the great risk the doctor “ran in taking a prominent part in politics, hoping thereby that Mr. George would dissuade a friend from exposing himself to clearly foreseen consequences. That same evening the following note was written: 42 Madison avenue. New York, Sept. 29, 1886 Reverend Dear Doctor—I have read with great regret a printed circular in which you and several others call a political mass meeting, to be held in this city on next Friday. You certainly have not forgotten the mandate of the holy father, the letters of the cardinal prefect of propaganda in '82 and '83, nor the renewed promises made by you to his eminence, the late cardinal archbishop. As your bishop, I now forbid you in the most positive manner to attend the proposed meeting in Chickering hall on Friday night, or to take part in future in any political meeting whatever without permission of the sacred congregation of propaganda fide. I am very sorry to be obliged to take this step, but, deeming it a matter of strict duty, I see no alternative. I am, reverend dear doctor, faithfully yours, Rev. Dr. McGlynn. M. A. Corrigan, Abp. To this note Dr. McGlynn replied by saying be would address the mass meeting, notwithstanding the prohibition,. and he was accordingly suspended for two weeks. in a letter of Oct. 2, of which the following is an extract: So flagrant an act of disobedience cannot be passed over. Before accepting the invitation to address the meeting you knew full well the distinct wishes of the S. C. of Propaganda. You were not ignorant of my own mind on the subject, as you expressly alluded to in your note to me introducing Mr. George. The objection, consequently, to your course of action has nothing whatever to do with this or that political party, but is founded on the instructions of the holy see and the nature of episcopal authority on one hand, and of sacerdotal obedience on the other. In view, then, of these facts, and much to my regret, I am constrained to have recourse to ecclesiastical censure. I hereby suspend you from all sacerdotal functions for the space of two weeks from date. Seventh—Next came the sad sight of a Catholic priest riding in an open barouche from poll to poll on election day. Some three weeks after the political campaign was over a pastoral letter was issued enunciating the plain teachings of the sovereign pontiff. A few days later. Nov. 26, the doctrine of Pope Leo XIII was assailed by Dr. McGlynn, although. be says, without adverting to it, and the statement of the holy fat her. that a solution of the conflict between rich and poor was to be found in the touchings of the Gospel, was met by another declaration that the true and only adequate remedy for social evils lay in the abolition of private ownership of land and in the restitution to all men of those rights in the soil that are now unjustly monopolized by a few.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Comrade Father Thomas Mcgrady: a Priest's Quest for Equality Through Socialism
    Wright State University CORE Scholar History Faculty Publications History 2014 Comrade Father Thomas McGrady: A Priest's Quest for Equality through Socialism Jacob H. Dorn Wright State University - Main Campus, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/history Part of the History Commons Repository Citation Dorn, J. H. (2014). Comrade Father Thomas McGrady: A Priest's Quest for Equality through Socialism. Fides et Historia, 46 (2), 1-27. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/history/256 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Fides et Historia 46:2 { ummer/Fall 2014): 1-27 COMRADE FATHER THOMAS MCGRADY: A PRIEST'S QUEST FOR EQUALITYTHROUGH SOCIALISM Jacob H. Dorn he ngrcgaLi n ol c. Anthony' pari h in B llevu , K ncucky, ju t a r che river fr m incinnaci, wa tunn don unday, eccmb r 7, 1902, wh n T Father Thoma M rady, it b loved pa t r, ann unced hi re ignation. Ac­ cording co the fulle t new paper account, "chere wa bowing of head , women and children wept." With great affection, the account continued, "almost all of the con­ gregation lingered and crowded around their beloved pastor, weeping and pleading with him not co leave them." He told them he would remain in the community, "only not as their priest." 1 This account examines McGrady's decision co become a socialise, his expe­ rience crying co combine priesthood of a parish with socialist activity, che conflicts chis combination brought with his bishop, and consequences in his personal life.
    [Show full text]
  • School of Theology - Seton Hall University file:///Volumes/Site%20Backups/Theology%2020090910/Lecture
    School of Theology - Seton Hall University file:///Volumes/Site%20Backups/theology%2020090910/lecture... A CENTURY OF PAPAL REPRESENTATION IN THE UNITED STATES Reverend Timothy M. Dolan Kenrick-Glennon Seminary Archdiocese of St. Louis Archbishop Gerety Lecture at Seton Hall University, October 15, 1992 "Hence we cheerfully sent one who should represent Our Person..." wrote Pope Leo XII in his encyclical Longinqua Oceani1 to the Church of the United States, January 6, 1895, referring to the appointment of the first apostolic delegate, Archbishop Francesco Satolli, just two years previous. That January 21, 1993, will be the centennial of this event suggested the topic of this year's Archbishop Gerety Lecture, "A Century of Papal Representation in the United States." Thank you for the invitation to be part of this distinguished lecture series. For the record, I have dedicated this meagre effort to the preeminent church historian of the United States, Monsignor John Tracy Ellis, my teacher, mentor and friend who, at 87, is now recuperating from hip surgery in Washington, D.C. May the Lord of Truth whom he has served so diligently be close to him in his recovery. I propose to develop this topic under five points. First, I will treat the way the Holy See approached America prior to Archbishop Satolli's appointment; secondly, I will consider the give-and-take surrounding his nomination in 1893; then will come a staccato-like overview of the comings-and-goings of his 10 successors; fourthly, I will take a look at just what, in general, the delegates have done, offering two examples of their activities; and, finally, I will conclude with a segment on the establishment of diplomatic relations between the Holy See and the government of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY a Recent Conference Held at the New York
    A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY A recent conference held at the New York School focused on the Father Edward McGlynn controversy. Dr. McGlynn, a contemporary of Henry George, was excarrnunicated from the Catholic Church because of a bitter battle with his superior, Archbishop Corrigan of New York. Ignited by the spirit of George, Father McGlynn campaigned for him during the 1886 mayoral race. His advocacy of the Georgist solution to the land problem brought him into conflict with various church officials. It was a controversy that shook the foundations of the church in the United States, 1eadingeventually to a letter from George to Pope Leo XIII in defense of Father McGlynn. Although the excommunication was lifted, many questions were left unanswered. An important one concerned the role religious groups and organizations should play in social matters. This question was hotly debated for the next 100 years. Significant changes have occured, however -- not only within the Catholic Church, but in other denominations as well. Today, the Church has enmeshed itself in such crucial -conce-rns-as--the-nucicpr arrn race.- ------ -- Having expressed their views on war, the struggle for military superiority and the advancement of weapons technologies, the Catholic Bishops of the United States will turn their attention, in the near future, to American capitalism. Without question, advocates of Henry George should be tuned in to the Bishop's prognosis for our economic system. The slow process of preparing a statement on such a wide-ranging issue offers Georgists a golden opportunity to enter the dialogue in an atmosphere radically different from Father McGlynn's era.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Shall Take Care of Our Sick? Bernadette Mccauley
    Who Shall Take Care of Our Sick? Bernadette McCauley Published by Johns Hopkins University Press McCauley, Bernadette. Who Shall Take Care of Our Sick? Roman Catholic Sisters and the Development of Catholic Hospitals in New York City. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005. Project MUSE. doi:10.1353/book.62237. https://muse.jhu.edu/. For additional information about this book https://muse.jhu.edu/book/62237 [ Access provided at 1 Oct 2021 03:58 GMT with no institutional affiliation ] This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Who Shall Take Care of Our Sick? Medicine, Science, and Religion in Historical Context Ronald L. Numbers, Consulting Editor Who Shall Take Care of Our Sick? Roman Catholic Sisters and the Development of Catholic Hospitals in New York City Bernadette McCauley The Johns Hopkins University Press baltimore © 2005 The Johns Hopkins University Press All rights reserved. Published 2005 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper 2 4 6 8 9 7 5 3 1 The Johns Hopkins University Press 2715 North Charles Street Baltimore, Maryland 21218-4363 www.press.jhu.edu Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data McCauley, Bernadette. Who shall take care of our sick? : Roman Catholic sisters and the development of Catholic hospitals in New York City / Bernadette McCauley. p. cm. — (Medicine, science, and religion in historical context) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8018-8216-8 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Catholic hospitals—New York (State)—New York—History. I. Title. II. Series. RA975.C37M38 2005 362.11Ј097471—dc22 2005000735 A catalog record for this book is available from the British Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Going My Way? Wending a Way Through 2 the Stumbling Blocks Between Georgism 3 and Catholicism 4 5 by MASON GAFFNEY* 6 7 ABSTRACT
    Toppan Best-set Premedia Limited Journal Code: AJES Proofreader: Emily Article No: 843 Delivery date: 23 July 2012 Page Extent: 27 1 Going My Way? Wending a Way Through 2 the Stumbling Blocks between Georgism 3 and Catholicism 4 5 By MASON GAFFNEY* 6 7 ABSTRACT. This essay surveys the issues between Georgists and 8 Roman Catholics in three classes: issues that are not peculiarly Roman 9 Catholic (RC) but play out across faiths and denominations, issues that 10 are peculiarly RC, and points of similarity and agreement. Addressed 11 in this fashion are the tensions that arise between the social gospel 12 and individual salvation, between specifics and glittering generalities, 13 between noblesse oblige and governmental reform, between the doc- 14 trine of original sin and tabula rasa, between the rich and the poor, 15 between the dignity of labor and the honor of predation, between 16 democracy and authority, between the regulatory emphasis rooted in 17 the philosophy of Aquinas and free markets, and between plain talk 18 and gobbledegook. 19 20 Introduction 21 22 There have been and are many Georgist Catholics and Catholic 23 Georgists. The divisions inside each group are perhaps as deep as the 24 divisions between them. This bodes well for future cooperation 25 between at least some Georgists and some Catholics. 26 Some outstanding Catholic Georgists or fellow-travelers in politics 27 have been Fr. Edward McGlynn (see Gaffney 2000), Governor Al 28 Smith, Mayor and Governor Edward Dunne, Mayor Daniel Hoan, 29 Union leader Margaret Haley, Presidential Advisor Joseph Tumulty, 30 Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Standard Volume 2 July 9, 1887
    The Standard Volume 2 July 9, 1887 Page 1 The Coming Excommunication The Roman machine has acted promptly and boldly. Before midnight on the Fourth July the American press were informed by cable that orders had been sent to the archbishop of New York to excommunicate Dr. McGlynn and to publish the decree of excommunication in the journals. Details have at this writing not yet been given to the public but private information to the effect that Archbishop Corrigan is been authorized by cable to communicate his “rebellious subject” with the major excommunication, declaring him he whom the faithful must avoid that the same major excommunication is to be declared against all Dr. McGlynn's “sympathizers and abettors,” while the minor excommunication is to be denounced against all who communicate with either Dr. McGlynn or those “sympathizers and abettors.” In taking this straightforward course Cardinal Simeoni and his associates of the propaganda have acted in much more manly fashion than if they had adopted the sneaking suggestion that has been made here—to pretend that Dr. McGlynn had excommunicated himself ipso facto. It will be well if Archbishop Corrigan will carry out his instructions in the same spirit. The occasion is important enough to justify the most solemn and impressive ceremony that the resources of the cathedral will enable him to get up. Long after all else that he has yet done shall be forgotten the name of Corrigan shall be remembered as that of the archbishop who excommunicated McGlynn. The decision of Rome draws the line aid makes clear the issue between the Roman hierarchy and the spirit of freedom.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to a Microfilm Edition of the John
    Guide to a Microfilm Edition of TiGze John 4reland Papers Scott Jessee Minnesota Historical Society * St. Paul * 1984 Copyright " 1984 by the Minnesota Historical Society International Standard Book Number: 0-87351-168-9 Library of Congress Catalog Number: 84-60157 This pamphlet and the ~nicrofilrnedition of the John Ireland Papers it describes were made possible by grants of funds from the National Historical Publications and aecords Commission, the Northwest Area Foundation, and the Catholic Historical Society to the Minnesota Historical Society. Foreword John Ireland (1838-1918) was one of the most important figures in American Catholic history. Born in Ireland, raised in Minnesota, and educated for the , priesthood in France, he was ordained for the Diocese of St. Paul in 1861. In 1862-1863 he served as chaplain to the Fifth Minnesota Volunteers. In 1869- / 1870 he represented his bishop, Thomas Grace, at the First Vatican Council. I Named vicar apostolic of the Nebraska Territory in 1875, he was immediately i renamed, at Bishop Grace's request, coadjutor of St. Paul. He succeeded to : that see in 1884 and attended the Third Plenary Council of Baltimore. In 1888, he was named the first archbishop of St. Paul. A dynamic speaker and lucid writer in both English and French, Ireland rapidly became the dominant figure in the liberal party that emerged in the ' American hierarchy after the Third Plenary Council. His influence over other members of that party is indicated by the extensive correspondence to him from Cardinal James Gibbons, archbishop of Baltimore; John J. Keane, 8 successively bishop of Richmond, first rector of the Catholic University of 1 America, titular archbishop of Damascus, and archbishop of Dubuque; and I Denis J.
    [Show full text]
  • December, 1998 Curriculum Vitae
    Curriculum Vitae Samuel J. Thomas, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Department of History, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, 48824; [email protected] Faculty member, January 1966 through May 2011. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Publications/Exhibits: “Empowering the People of God: John Cardinal Dearden’s Church of Tomorrow,” in Jeremy Bonner et al, eds., Empowering the People of God: Catholic Action before and after Vatican II (New York: Fordham University Press, 2014), 249-273; 362-375. “Immanence and Transcendence: John Cardinal Dearden’s Church of Tomorrow.” American Catholic Studies, Vol. 121 (Winter, 2010), 1-30. “No Holds Barred: Political Cartoons and Gilded Age Politics”: A Multi-media Exhibit, MSU Museum, August 24-December 31, 2008, “Episcopal Authority and Clerical Dissent: Walter J. Burghardt, S.J. and Humanae Vitae.” American Catholic Studies, Vol. 119 (Summer 2008), 35-69. “Political Cartoons of the Gilded Age,” a “critical documentary essay” in the digital collection, The Gilded Age. Alexandria Virginia: Alexander St. Press, 2007. "A 'final disposition one way or another': The Real End of the First Curran Affair," The Catholic Historical Review, Vol. 91 (October 2005), 214-242. "Teaching the GAPE (and other periods) with Political Cartoons: A Systematic Approach to Primary Source Analysis," The History Teacher, Vol. 37 (August 2004), 425-446. "Mugwump Cartoonists, the Papacy and Tammany Hall in America’s Gilded Age," for Religion and American Culture: A Journal of Interpretation, Vol. 14 (Summer 2004) 213-250. "Holding the Tiger: Mugwump Cartoonists and Tammany Hall in Gilded Age New York," New York History, LXXXII (Spring, 2001), 155-182. “In No Sense an Inquisition: Alexander Zaleski and the Bishops’ Committee on Doctrine, 1966-1970,” Polish American Studies, LVII (Spring 2000), 55-72.
    [Show full text]
  • Catholics Incorporated: Class, Power, and the Politics
    CATHOLICS INCORPORATED: CLASS, POWER, AND THE POLITICS OF ASSIMILATION IN NINETEENTH CENTURY AMERICA By PATRICK T. MCGRATH A dissertation submitted to the School of Graduate Studies Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in History Written under the direction of T.J. Jackson Lears And approved by _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey October 2017 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Catholics Incorporated: Class, Power, and the Politics of Assimilation in Nineteenth Century America By PATRICK T. MCGRATH Dissertation Director: T.J. Jackson Lears This project takes as its subject the integration of Catholicism into nineteenth-century American society, politics, and culture. Adopting a cross-regional approach, the dissertation argues that by midcentury the Church was far better integrated into the American South than the North, and had forged a powerful alliance with the Southern planter elite and the Southern-dominated Democratic Party. In the aftermath of the Civil War, the Church increasingly forged an alliance with the growing Irish- American middle-class, whose influence within Democratic politics proved critical to the advancement of Catholic interests. During the Gilded Age the Church itself proved an arena of ideological conflict, as working-class radicals and Irish-American elites sought to define the Church’s relationship to power and poverty. In the 1890s, however, many working-class radicals returned to the Church and embraced Catholic conservatism. At 1900 the Irish-dominated institutional Church defined itself as a bulwark of conservatism, moral order, and “American” values against the threat of secular radicals and liberals.
    [Show full text]
  • HAMILTON MEN DINE. \U25a0new-YORK DAILYTRIBUNE
    \u25a0NEW-YORK DAILY TRIBUNE. FRIDAY. JANUARY 12. 1900. 7 MEN DINE. HEAVY OF HAMILTON BOWXPOVR RATX. TRIBUTES TO DR. MGLYNX OBITUARY- HOTEL MEN MAKE MERRY DIED. mUSS-On Wednesday. January 10. of pseoasoßla. Bsoax' FROM SECRETARY AS MUCH •« P. Bliss, fm of *.*-.e iate Wiiliaa asd Atbeaaldai A BRIEF SPEECH FELL YESTERDAY IN SEVEN GENERAL DABNET H. MATrIT. Bl:aa. a«s« » Fears, afjafß MR. CROSBY SATS Funeral serrtces at ta* r-alOia i =f his cade. Sa SO ALEX- VICAR GENERAL'S BRIGHT SPEECHES RY SIMEON mcrntag BOOT- BTBYKEB OX HOURS AS IN THE WHOLE MONTH Richmond. Va.. Jan. 11.— News has been received FlfU>-*-ve.. an Friday at 11 o'clock. her- of Peorla, 111., Dabney OF EULOGY GAVE the death in of General <;RT'BER l CHENET—— On Thursday, .•aauary 11. ar South JUacS**- APPROVAL ANDER HAMILTON. DECEMBER. CHURCH'S H. Maury. In the Confederate Army, ABRAHAM Cona.. m»r- Brataart. wife nt Csanes Camay and — who served daughter of Lev«retr an** Mary Sulxeley Braiaari The lcyai \u25a0« of Hamilton rainstorm which passed over this and was for some time Minister to Colombia. The Fan*rai at South Sarrtrimy Almost one hundred city ve«- TO GEORGE'S DOCTRINES. body Fredericksburg, OTHaOs*. H«iHw»r ob aftirsiso. Snvny last night for the terday was an unusually heavy one will be broughts to Va-. for January 13. ar 2:3 Ao'clock. * at the Hotel pared when com- burial. Burial private. «^SrS Association with those that visited this city A meeting in memory of the late Dr. Edward T.~L-- rfthe Hamilton Alumni in December A lot of men.
    [Show full text]
  • Henry George Dr. Edward Mcglynn & Pope Leo XIII
    HENRY GEORGE, DR. EDWARD MCGLYNN, AND POPE LEO XIII Henry George Dr. Edward McGlynn & Pope Leo XIII by Mason Gaffney THE STORY OF HOW CLERICAL HIERARCHS PERCEIVED A PROGRESSIVE ECONOMIST AND A POPULAR IRISH- AMERICAN PRIEST AS DANGEROUS THREATS TO THE CHURCH — AND HOW THIS LED TO THE WATERSHED PAPAL ENCYCLICAL THAT SHAPED ROMAN CATHOLIC SOCIAL DOCTRINE FROM 1891 TO THE PRESENT DAY. 35 HENRY GEORGE, DR. EDWARD MCGLYNN, AND POPE LEO XIII HENRY GEORGE, DR. EDWARD MCGLYNN, AND POPE LEO XIII by Mason Gaffney A paper delivered to the International Conference on Henry George, November 1, 1997, at Cooper Union, New York; Professor Edward O’Donnell, Chair. Revised 12 March 2000 1. TURBULENT TIMES IT WAS A DIFFERENT TIME, but often the same place (Cooper Union) in American life. No, it wasn’t radio, but the age of orators. One of the most spellbinding was Dr. Edward McGlynn; another good one was Henry George, who also wrote great books. They came together in 1886 to roil the waters of American politics and ideology. Through the Irish and Vatican connections, they also roiled world politics and ideology. It was a time when a Republican Presidential candidate (James G. Blaine) could be nominated by a militant atheist (Robert G. Ingersoll). Blaine could lose New York’s key Irish Catholic voters, and the election, for a supporter’s casual slur accusing them of “Rum, Romanism and Rebellion.” The slur was transient; the revelation of electoral power was permanent. New York State held the balance of power nationally; New York City held the balance in the State; and the Irish were a majority in the City (Curran p.195).
    [Show full text]
  • A Social History of the Brooklyn Irish, 1850–1900
    A Social History of the Brooklyn Irish, 1850–1900 Stephen Jude Sullivan Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy under the Executive Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2013 © 2013 Stephen Jude Sullivan All rights reserved ABSTRACT A Social History of the Brooklyn Irish, 1850-1900 Stephen Jude Sullivan A full understanding of nineteenth century Irish America requires close examination of emigration as well as immigration. Knowledge of Irish pre-emigration experiences is a key to making sense of their post-emigration lives. This work analyzes the regional origins, the migration and settlement patterns, and the work and associational life of the Catholic Irish in Brooklyn between 1850 and 1900. Over this pivotal half century, the Brooklyn Irish developed a rich associational life which included temperance, Irish nationalism, land reform and Gaelic language and athletic leagues. This era marked the emergence of a more diverse, mature Irish- Catholic community, a community which responded in a new ways to a variety of internal and external challenges. To a degree, the flowering of Irish associational life represented a reaction to the depersonalization associated with American industrialization. However, it also reflected the changing cultural norms of many post-famine immigrants. Unlike their pre-1870 predecessors, these newcomers were often more modern in outlook – more committed to Irish nationhood, less impoverished, better educated and more devout. Consequently, post-1870 immigrants tended to be over-represented in the ranks of associations dedicated to Irish nationalism, Irish temperance, trade unionism, and cultural revivalism throughout Kings County.
    [Show full text]