For Saving Species ISSN 2652-1334 Winter 2018 Issue 8 Saving the Brush-Tailed Rabbit-Rat

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

For Saving Species ISSN 2652-1334 Winter 2018 Issue 8 Saving the Brush-Tailed Rabbit-Rat Science for saving species ISSN 2652-1334 Winter 2018 Issue 8 Saving the brush-tailed rabbit-rat Australia’s most imperilled animals Protecting an elusive dunnart Bioacoustic monitoring Booderee’s mammal puzzle Bundles of quoll joy IMAGE: BY JOHN DAVIES Magazine of the Threatened Species Recovery Hub No surprises, no regrets: identifying Australia’s most imperilled animal species It was only in 1929 that thylacines were first afforded any protection under legislation. Seven years later they were added to the list of protected wildlife, but the last known individual died that same year. The Christmas Island forest skink was first included on Australia’s list of threatened species in January 2014. Just four months later, the last known individual died. Both extinctions could almost certainly have been prevented if action had been taken earlier. The gnawing question ‘what if we had known earlier...?’ is a recurring theme of frustration and failure in much conservation biology – as it is in human experience generally. When recognition of the imminence of a serious and irretrievable loss is belated, opportunities for better outcomes are fatally lost. The trajectory and timetable of species to species, and their degree of confidence in extinction was looming larger for the extinction is at least partly predictable. that assessment. Estimates were pooled most imperilled birds than for mammals. To provide forewarnings, a TSR Hub project, across experts, with weighting by this This may be because many of the most is identifying the Australian animal species confidence level. From this information, imperilled mammals have had some recent at greatest risk and estimating the likelihood we ordered species by their likelihood of reprieves through translocations to that they will become extinct over the extinction, and then summed these estimates predator exclosures and cat-free islands. next 20-year period, if there is no change across species to derive estimates of the One feature of the project to date has been in current management. Our rationale is number of species likely to be become extinct the cooperative involvement of managers and that if governments, managers and the in 20 years, assuming current management. experts from Australian, state and territory community are aware of which species are Our purpose is not to present a doomsday agencies, and conservation organisations. most imperilled, they can take emergency book of damned Australian nature, but This involvement has given the process care to seek to prevent such extinctions – rather to alert responsible agencies and the and results considerable traction among to act before it is too late. community of what will be lost if they do government agencies and NGOs. To some extent, the proximity of a species to not act. And act soon, and act decisively. The project rolls on. Recently, we repeated extinction is already described by a species’ But our results (published at http:// the process for the most imperilled fish, international, national or state/territory www.publish.csiro.au/PC/PC18006) conservation status. Species listed as Critically under the guidance of and in collaboration are disconcerting. We are predicting that Endangered are closer to the abyss than are with the Australian Society for Fish Biology. the extinction rate for birds and mammals species listed as Vulnerable, and even more Those results were fascinating and of serious will be higher than at any other time so than the sadly dismissive category of Least concern. Many of the native fish species since European settlement of Australia: Concern. However, many imperilled species considered are not yet listed as threatened we expect seven mammal and ten bird taxa have not yet had their conservation status under Australian or state legislation, but the will disappear in the next two decades. formally assessed: the forest skink provides experts generally rated them as at greater a valuable lesson that species not listed as Many of the most imperilled species risk of extinction than most listed threatened can still be at risk. Furthermore, the (see table) are poorly known and have threatened bird and mammal species. existing conservation status codings are broad previously received little public attention or Further assessments are now being categories and do not effectively indicate the conservation investment. Happily, Birdlife conducted or are proposed for many amount of time managers may have to act. Australia is now campaigning for some of other animal groups. these uncharismatic but much-troubled birds Our starting point in this research was to (‘Save the Forgotten Flock’: see http:// assemble many experts and all relevant John Woinarski information for Australian birds and mammals. www.birdlife.org.au/current-appeal). Hayley Geyle Based on this information, every expert was Perhaps unexpectedly, given the higher recent Stephen Garnett asked to rate the likelihood of extinction rate of extinctions of Australian mammals within 20 years for the most threatened than of birds, our assessment found that Inside the Winter 2018 issue of Science for Saving Species Australia’s most imperilled animal species 2 Saving the brush-tailed rabbit-rat 10 The Kangaroo Island dunnart 4 The missing mammals of Booderee 12 Bioacoustic monitoring of black-cockatoos 6 Booderee’s bundles of quoll joy 14 Refuges offer hope for the spotted tree frog 8 John Kanowski: A life in ecology 16 2 Science for saving species #8 The 20 Australian birds most at risk The 20 Australian mammals most at risk of extinction over the next 20 years of extinction over the next 20 years Mean Mean likelihood of likelihood extinction of extinction within within 20 Rank Species or sub-species 20 years (%) Rank Species or sub-species years (%) King Island brown thornbill Central rock-rat 1 94 1 65 Acanthiza pusilla archibaldi Zyzomys pedunculatus* Orange-bellied parrot Northern hopping-mouse 2 87 2 48 Neophema chrysogaster* Notomys aquilo* King Island scrubtit Carpentarian rock-rat 3 83 3 44 Acanthornis magna greeniana Zyzomys palatalis Western ground parrot Christmas Island flying-fox 4 75 4 41 Pezoporus wallicus flaviventris* Pteropus natalis* Houtman Abrolhos painted button-quail Black-footed tree-rat (Kimberley 5 71 Turnix varius scintillans 5 and mainland NT) 39 Mesembriomys gouldii gouldii Plains-wanderer 6 64 Pedionomus torquatus* Gilbert’s potoroo 6 36 Potorous gilbertii* Regent honeyeater 7 57 Leadbeater’s possum Anthochaera phrygia* 7 29 Gymnobelideus leadbeateri* Grey-range thick-billed grasswren 8 53 Nabarlek (Top End) Amytornis modestus obscurior 8 29 Petrogale concinna canescens Herald petrel 9 52 Brush-tailed phascogale (Kimberley) Pterodroma heraldica^ 9 28 Phascogale tapoatafa kimberleyensis Black-eared miner 10 47 Brush-tailed rabbit-rat (Kimberley, Top Manorina melanotis 10 25 End) Conilurus penicillatus penicillatus* Northern eastern bristlebird* 11 39 Western ringtail possum Dasyornis brachypterus monoides 11 25 Pseudocheirus occidentalis* Mallee emu-wren 12 34 Northern brush-tailed phascogale Stipiturus mallee* 12 23 Phascogale pirata Swift parrot 13 31 Mountain pygmy-possum Lathamus discolor* 13 22 Burramys parvus* Norfolk Island boobook 14 27 Kangaroo Island dunnart Ninox novaeseelandiae undulata* 14 22 Sminthopsis griseoventer aitkeni* Mount Lofty Ranges chestnut- 15 rumped heathwren 24 Brush-tailed rabbit-rat (Tiwi Islands) 15 21 Calamanthus pyrrhopygia parkeri Conilurus penicillatus melibius* Fleurieu Peninsula southern emu-wren Silver-headed antechinus 16 17 16 20 Stipiturus malachurus intermedius Antechinus argentus Helmeted honeyeater Southern bent-winged bat 17 17 17 18 Lichenostomus melanops cassidix* Miniopterus orianae bassanii Cocos buff-banded rail Black-tailed antechinus 18 17 18 17 Hypotaenidia philippensis andrewsi Antechinus arktos Western bristlebird Northern bettong 19 16 19 14 Dasyornis longirostris Bettongia tropica Alligator Rivers yellow chat Tasman Peninsula dusky antechinus 20 15 20 14 Epthianura crocea tunneyi* Antechinus vandycki ^ Refers to Australian breeding population. *Australia’s Threatened Species Strategy *Australia’s Threatened Species Strategy (2016) includes ten mammals from Table 1 (2016) includes ten birds from Table 1 as priorities species. as priority species. No. 1: Central rock rat No. 11: Western ringtail possum No. 11: Black-eared miner No. 2: Orange-bellied parrot Photo: Peter McDonald Photo: JJ Harrison CC BY SA 3.0 Wikimedia Commons Photo: Kaori Yokochi, Photo: Ron Knight Roberta Bencini CC BY 2.0 3 CC BY 4.0 Wikimedia Wikimedia Commons Magazine of the Threatened Species Recovery Hub Detecting and protecting the Kangaroo Island dunnart IMAGE: ROSEMARY HOHNEN The Endangered Kangaroo Island dunnart has been identified as one of the top 20 ABOVE: Volunteers Sarah Leeson and Australian mammals at risk of extinction. Efforts to recover the species will be greatly Alex Hartshorn sit down to weigh, measure and identify animals caught at a trapping helped by filling knowledge gaps about the ecology of the species and how it responds site on western Kangaroo Island. to conservation actions. The mouse-sized carnivorous marsupial has only rarely been seen in the past 20 years and TSR Hub researcher Rosemary Hohnen is on the job working with local partners to develop better monitoring methods for the elusive species, and to evaluate the impact of feral cats on its persistence. Here she gives us a taste of the action, and despite the tiny size of the mammal there is a lot of heavy lifting… After
Recommended publications
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Issue3.7 MB
    Volume Eleven Conservation Science 2016 Western Australia Review and synthesis of knowledge of insular ecology, with emphasis on the islands of Western Australia IAN ABBOTT and ALLAN WILLS i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION 2 METHODS 17 Data sources 17 Personal knowledge 17 Assumptions 17 Nomenclatural conventions 17 PRELIMINARY 18 Concepts and definitions 18 Island nomenclature 18 Scope 20 INSULAR FEATURES AND THE ISLAND SYNDROME 20 Physical description 20 Biological description 23 Reduced species richness 23 Occurrence of endemic species or subspecies 23 Occurrence of unique ecosystems 27 Species characteristic of WA islands 27 Hyperabundance 30 Habitat changes 31 Behavioural changes 32 Morphological changes 33 Changes in niches 35 Genetic changes 35 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK 36 Degree of exposure to wave action and salt spray 36 Normal exposure 36 Extreme exposure and tidal surge 40 Substrate 41 Topographic variation 42 Maximum elevation 43 Climate 44 Number and extent of vegetation and other types of habitat present 45 Degree of isolation from the nearest source area 49 History: Time since separation (or formation) 52 Planar area 54 Presence of breeding seals, seabirds, and turtles 59 Presence of Indigenous people 60 Activities of Europeans 63 Sampling completeness and comparability 81 Ecological interactions 83 Coups de foudres 94 LINKAGES BETWEEN THE 15 FACTORS 94 ii THE TRANSITION FROM MAINLAND TO ISLAND: KNOWNS; KNOWN UNKNOWNS; AND UNKNOWN UNKNOWNS 96 SPECIES TURNOVER 99 Landbird species 100 Seabird species 108 Waterbird
    [Show full text]
  • Inquiry Into the Problem of Feral and Domestic Cats in Australia to The
    28 July 2020 Re: Inquiry into the problem of feral and domestic cats in Australia To the Committee Secretariat, Thank you for this opportunity to make a submission to the Inquiry into the problem of feral and domestic cats in Australia. The Society for Conservation Biology Oceania Section is the peak professional group for conservation biology in Australia, with 400 members that include conservation scientists, policy-makers and managers. Our role is to provide scientific information for management and policy decisions about the long term sustainability and future of ecosystems and their dependent organisms, recognising the importance of ecosystem services for humanity and based on the best available science. Feral and domestic cats have had severe impacts on Australian wildlife since their introduction by Europeans and will continue to do so into the foreseeable future. Feral cats threaten a large number of mammal, bird and reptile species and reducing the impacts of cats is critical to the conservation of Australia’s biodiversity. Reducing the impacts of cats is challenging and while there have been many advances in this space over the past 40 or so years, an effective, broadscale control tool remains elusive. As described in this submission, effectively reducing the impacts of cats on vulnerable fauna populations requires approaches that are tailored to the specifics of each management context, consider both lethal and non-lethal approaches, and take a whole-of-ecosystem approach, including accounting for other threats such as fire and grazing, and interactions with foxes, dingoes, rabbits and other species. We address terms of reference a, b, e, f and h in detail below.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOLOGICAL SURVEY of KANGAROO ISLAND SOUTH AUSTRALIA in NOVEMBER 1989 and 1990
    A BIOLOGICAL SURVEY OF KANGAROO ISLAND SOUTH AUSTRALIA IN NOVEMBER 1989 and 1990 Editors A. C. Robinson D. M. Armstrong Biological Survey and Research Section Heritage and Biodiversity Division Department for Environment, Heritage and Aboriginal Affairs, South Australia 1999 i Kangaroo Island Biological Survey The Biological Survey of Kangaroo Island, South Australia was carried out with the assistance of funds made available by, the Commonwealth of Australia under the 1989-90 National Estate Grants Programs and the State Government of South Australia. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the Australian Heritage Commission or the State Government of South Australia. The report may be cited as: Robinson, A. C. & Armstrong, D. M. (eds) (1999) A Biological Survey of Kangaroo Island, South Australia, 1989 & 1990. (Heritage and Biodiversity Section, Department for Environment, Heritage and Aboriginal Affairs, South Australia). Copies of the report may be accessed in the library: Environment Australia Department for Environment, Heritage and Aboriginal Affairs GPO Box 636 or 1st Floor, Roma Mitchell House CANBERRA ACT 2601 136 North Terrace, ADELAIDE SA 5000 EDITORS A.C. Robinson, D.M. Armstrong, Biological Survey and Research, Heritage &Biodiversity Section, Department for Environment Heritage and Aboriginal Affairs PO Box 1047 ADELAIDE 5001 AUTHORS D M Armstrong, P.J.Lang, A C Robinson, Biological Survey and Research, Heritage &Biodiversity Section, Department for Environment, Heritage and Aboriginal Affairs PO Box 1047 ADELAIDE 5001 N Draper, Australian Cultural Heritage Management Pty Ltd, 53 Hackney Rd. HACKNEY, SA 5069 G Carpenter, Biodiversity Monitoring and Evaluation, Heritage &Biodiversity Section, Department for Environment Heritage and Aboriginal Affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes from the Kangaroo Island Dunnart Workshop Monday 27 May 2019, Ozone Hotel, Kangaroo Island
    Minutes from the Kangaroo Island dunnart workshop Monday 27 May 2019, Ozone Hotel, Kangaroo Island In attendance Rosemary Hohnen (National Environmental Science Program (NESP) Threatened Species Recovery Hub (TSRH)), Jasper Taylor (Kangaroo Island (KI) Natural Resources Management (NRM) Board), John Woinarski (NESP TSRH), Sarah Legge (NESP TSRH), Chris Dickman (NESP TSRH), Oliver Tester (Department of Environment and Energy, Australian Government (DoEE)), Leonie Brettell (DoEE), Emma Graham (DoEE), Dan Rogers (Department for Environment and Water Government of SA (DEW)), Peter Copley (DEW), Jody Gates (DEW), Jennie Fluin (DEW), Jason Higham (DEW), Matt Heard (DEW), Robyn Molsher (DEW), Damon Ezis (DEW), Damian Miley (Natural Resources KI, DEW (NRKI)), Mike Grieg (NRKI), Phillipa Holden (NRKI), Brett Dalzell (NRKI), Venetia Bolwell (NRKI), Karleah Berris (NRKI), Brenton Florance (NRKI), Josh Mulvaney (NRKI), Paul Jennings (NRKI), Danny Male (NRKI), Ross Evans (NRKI), Rebecca Mussared (NRKI), Sharon Gullickson (NRKI), Anne McLean (NRKI), Tony Sandeman (NRKI), Katherine Tuft (Arid Recovery), Hugh McGregor (Arid Recovery), Pat Hodgens (Kangaroo Island Land for Wildlife (KI LfW), Heidi Groffen (KI LfW), James Doube (KI landholder), Peter Hammond (KI landholder), Nirbeeja Saraswati (KI landholder), Tony Robinson (KI landholder), Julia Haska (KI landholder), John Hodgson (KI landholder), Pip Masters (Envisage Environmental Solutions (EES)) and Rick Southgate (EES). Apologies Sally Box (Threatened Species Commissioner, Australian Government), Fiona Fraser (DoEE), Peter Latch (DoEE), Brett Murphy (Charles Darwin University TSRH) and Trish Mooney (NRKI). Introduction and welcome Dan Rogers welcomed all participants to the meeting and outlined the aim of the workshop: to discuss the information known about the Kangaroo Island dunnart and the threats to it, and use this to develop a Conservation Advice under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 ( EPBC Act) for the species.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Australia: October-November 2016
    Tropical Birding Trip Report Eastern Australia: October-November 2016 A Tropical Birding SET DEPARTURE tour EASTERN AUSTRALIA: From Top to Bottom 23rd October – 11th November 2016 The bird of the trip, the very impressive POWERFUL OWL Tour Leader: Laurie Ross All photos in this report were taken by Laurie Ross/Tropical Birding. 1 www.tropicalbirding.com +1-409-515-9110 [email protected] Page Tropical Birding Trip Report Eastern Australia: October-November 2016 INTRODUCTION The Eastern Australia Set Departure Tour introduces a huge amount of new birds and families to the majority of the group. We started the tour in Cairns in Far North Queensland, where we found ourselves surrounded by multiple habitats from the tidal mudflats of the Cairns Esplanade, the Great Barrier Reef and its sandy cays, lush lowland and highland rainforests of the Atherton Tablelands, and we even made it to the edge of the Outback near Mount Carbine; the next leg of the tour took us south to Southeast Queensland where we spent time in temperate rainforests and wet sclerophyll forests within Lamington National Park. The third, and my favorite leg, of the tour took us down to New South Wales, where we birded a huge variety of new habitats from coastal heathland to rocky shorelines and temperate rainforests in Royal National Park, to the mallee and brigalow of Inland New South Wales. The fourth and final leg of the tour saw us on the beautiful island state of Tasmania, where we found all 13 “Tassie” endemics. We had a huge list of highlights, from finding a roosting Lesser Sooty Owl in Malanda; to finding two roosting Powerful Owls near Brisbane; to having an Albert’s Lyrebird walk out in front of us at O Reilly’s; to seeing the rare and endangered Regent Honeyeaters in the Capertee Valley, and finding the endangered Swift Parrot on Bruny Island, in Tasmania.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasmania and the Orange-Bellied Parrot – Set Departure Trip Report
    AUSTRALIA: TASMANIA AND THE ORANGE-BELLIED PARROT – SET DEPARTURE TRIP REPORT 22 – 27 OCTOBER 2018 By Andy Walker We enjoyed excellent views of several of the Critically Endangered (IUCN) Orange-bellied Parrots during the tour. www.birdingecotours.com [email protected] 2 | TRIP REPORT Australia: Tasmania and the Orange-bellied Parrot: October 2018 Overview This short Tasmania group tour commenced in the state capital Hobart on the 22nd of October 2018 and concluded back there on the 27th of October 2018. The tour focused on finding the state’s endemic birds as well as two breeding endemic species (both Critically Endangered [IUCN] parrots), and the tour is a great way to get accustomed to Australian birds and birding ahead of the longer East Coast tour. The tour included a couple of days birding in the Hobart environs, a day trip by light aircraft to the southwest of the state, and a couple of days on the picturesque and bird-rich Bruny Island. We found, and got very good views of, all twelve endemic birds of Tasmania, these being Forty- spotted Pardalote, Green Rosella, Tasmanian Nativehen, Scrubtit, Tasmanian Scrubwren, Dusky Robin, Strong-billed, Black-headed, and Yellow-throated Honeyeaters, Yellow Wattlebird, Tasmanian Thornbill, and Black Currawong, as well as the two Critically Endangered breeding endemic species (Orange-bellied Parrot and Swift Parrot), of which we also got excellent and prolonged views of a sizeable proportion of their global populations. Other highlights included Little Penguin, Hooded Dotterel, Freckled Duck, White-bellied Sea Eagle, Wedge-tailed Eagle, Grey Goshawk, Laughing Kookaburra, Yellow-tailed Black Cockatoo, Blue-winged Parrot, Pink Robin, Flame Robin, Scarlet Robin, Striated Fieldwren, Southern Emu-wren, and Beautiful Firetail.
    [Show full text]
  • References for Biodiversity Values Database and Threatened Fauna Adviser
    References for Biodiversity Values Database and Threatened Fauna Adviser Anderson, R 2001, 'Ptunarra Brown Butterfly Project', Invertebrata, vol. 19, no. , p. 5. Anderson, R & McQuillan, PB 2003, 'Flight activity and territoriality in a threatened butterfly Oreixenica ptunarra Couchman (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Satyrinae)', Records of the South Australian Museum Mongraph Series vol. 7, pp. 297-301. Ashworth, JM 1998, 'An Appraisal of the Conservation Status of Litoria raniformis (Kefferstein) in Tasmania', Masters thesis, University of Tasmania. Atkins, A 1984, 'A new genus Antipodia (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Trapezitinae) with comments on its biology', Australian Entomological Magazine, vol. 10, no. 6, p. 84. Backhouse, G, Jackson, J & O’Connor, J 2008, Background and Implementation Information for the Australian Grayling Prototroctes maraena National Recovery Plan, Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne. ---- 2008, National Recovery Plan for the Australian Grayling Prototroctes maraena, Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne. Barker, P 1999, Recovery Plan for Tasmanian Native Grasslands 2000-2002, Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, Hobart. Barker, S 1979, 'New species and a catalogue of Stigmodera (Castiarina) (Coleoptera: Buprestidae)', Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia, vol. 103, pp. 1-23. ---- 1986, 'Stigmodera (Castiarina) (Coleoptera: Buprestidae): taxonomy, new species and a checklist', Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia, vol. 110, pp. 1-36. ---- 1988, 'Contributions to the taxonomy of Stigmodera (Castiarina) (Coleoptera: Buprestidae)', Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia, vol. 112, pp. 133-42. Barmuta, L 2008, Management Issues Relevant for Biodiversity Conservation in Freshwater Ecosystems, Background Document 6. Report to the Biodiversity Expert Review Panel, Forest Practices Authority, Hobart. ---- 2009, Background Document 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Vale of Belvoir Reserve Supplement Contents Key
    BUSH BLITZ SPECIES DISCOVERY PrOGRAM Vale of Belvoir Reserve Supplement Contents Key Appendix A: Species Lists 3 ¤ = Previously recorded on the reserve and Fauna 4 found on this survey Vertebrates 4 * = New record for this reserve Birds 4 ^ = Exotic/Pest Fishes 5 # = EPBC listed Frogs 5 ~ = TSP listed Putative new species Mammals 6 Previously recorded on the reserve but not found on Reptiles 6 this survey Invertebrates 7 Bees 7 EPBC = Environment Protection and Biodiversity Butterflies and Moths 7 Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth) Flies 7 TSP = Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 Beetles 7 (Tasmania) True Bugs 8 Grasshoppers 8 Dragonflies 8 Caddisflies 9 Millipedes 9 Spiders 10 Crustaceans 10 Snails and Slugs 11 Flora 12 Flowering Plants 12 Gymnosperms 13 Ferns and Fern Allies 13 Liverworts 14 Mosses 14 Fungi 15 Appendix B: Rare and Threatened Species 17 Appendix C: Exotic and Pest Species 19 2 Bush Blitz survey report — Tasmania 2010 Appendix A: Species Lists Nomenclature and taxonomy used in this appendix are consistent with that from the Australian Faunal Directory (AFD), the Australian Plant Name Index (APNI) and the Australian Plant Census (APC). Current at April 2012 Vale of Belvoir Reserve Supplement 3 Fauna Vertebrates Birds Family Species Common name Acanthizidae Acanthiza ewingii Tasmanian Thornbill Acanthiza pusilla * Brown Thornbill Acanthornis magna Scrubtit Calamanthus fuliginosus * Striated Fieldwren Sericornis frontalis * White-browed Scrubwren Sericornis humilis * Tasmanian Scrubwren Accipitridae Aquila audax *
    [Show full text]
  • Kangaroo Island Coastline, South Australia
    Kangaroo Island coastline, South Australia TERN gratefully acknowledges the many landholders across Kangaroo Island for their assistance and support during the project and for allowing access to their respective properties. Thank you to Pat Hodgens for his invaluable support and advice. Thanks also to the many volunteers, in particular Lachlan Pink and Max McQuillan, who helped to collect, curate and process the data and samples. Lastly, many thanks to staff from the South Australian Herbarium for undertaking the plant identifications. Citation: TERN (2020) Summary of Plots on Kangaroo Island, October 2018. Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network, Adelaide. Summary of Plots on Kangaroo Island ............................................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgements............................................................................................................................................................. 2 Contents .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Accessing the Data ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Point
    [Show full text]
  • Some Personal Reflections on the Present and Future of Australia's
    EMR doi: 10.1111/emr.12403 INTERVIEW Some personal reflections on the present and future of Australia’s fauna in an increasingly fire‐prone continent By Chris Dickman and Tein McDonald Australia already has the highest rate of species loss of any region in the world, yet the risks suddenly worsened in the spring–summer of 2019–20, with an unprecedented chain of wildfires covering 10 M ha of the nation’s forest and woodland estate. Fires of this scale were unprecedented and not factored into recovery plans for Threatened Species or ecosystem management in general. EMR asks one of Australia’s most pre‐eminent ecologists what can be done Figure 1. Professor Chris Dickman is pictured here releasing an eastern quoll at Booderee to ameliorate the losses and National Park, NSW, with David Smith. Chris has been involved in studying fauna in Australian ecosystems for over four decades, guiding many cohorts of honours and post‐graduate students better avoid and respond to and earning widespread recognition from his peers. His unequivocal statements regarding the such impacts occurring in potential impact of, and appropriate responses to, the 2019–20 Australian wildfires have been cru- the future? cial in assisting agencies, organisations and communities prepare for timely post‐fire actions and to work towards improved environmental disaster planning. (Photograph: Judy Dunlop). Key words: ecosystem recovery, environmental disaster planning, fragmentation, Threatened Species, published researcher holding wildfire. M: Chris, you were the many highly prestigious roles as Tresearcher who broke the Chris Dickman is Professor in Terrestrial Ecol- a scientist and are not prone to news to the world about the ogy, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, exaggerated statements.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Preferences for Adaptation Measures to Conserve Australian Birds Threatened by Climate Change
    Social preferences for adaptation measures to conserve Australian birds threatened by climate change S TEPHEN T. GARNETT,KERSTIN K. ZANDER,SHANNON H AGERMAN T ERRE A. SATTERFIELD and J ÜRGEN M EYERHOFF Abstract Debate about climate change adaptation for bio- McDaniels, ), with solutions as much values-based as diversity, and the ethics and consequences of assisted colon- technical (Hewitt et al., ) and with pros and cons evident ization in particular, has polarized professional opinion but in all options. Assisted colonization (also called assisted mi- the views of the wider community are unknown. We tested gration; Hewitt et al., ), in which climate-challenged four hypotheses about the acceptability of adaptation strat- taxa are moved to places where the climate is predicted to egies among a sample of the Australian general public using be more suitable, may also provide opportunities for inva- a combination of direct questions and a choice experiment. sive species (Ricciardi & Simberloff, ). Adaptive intro- We found that () among the % who wanted extinction gression, where new genes that could aid adaptation are avoided, increased in situ management of wild populations introduced to climate-affected populations (Hamilton & was preferred to captive breeding or assisted colonization, Miller, ), can compromise species integrity (Gómez () preferences for adaptation strategies were not explained et al., ). Captive breeding will inevitably cause loss of by gender, income, education or knowledge about birds, () genetic variability (Araki et al., ) even if current cap- genetically distinctive taxa were not actively preferred, () acity constraints (Alroy, ) can be overcome. Less intru- . % of respondents were content for conservation man- sive approaches, such as intensified in-situ management of agers to make decisions about strategies rather than local sensitive species, are potentially only short-term invest- communities or the general public.
    [Show full text]