DOCSLIB.ORG

Uluborlu WF ESIA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Uluborlu WF ESIA Environment Prepared to: Submitted by: Kavram Enerji AECOM Turkey Ankara, Turkey AECOM-TR-R-765-01-01 October 2014 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment for Uluborlu Wind Farm Project in Isparta, Turkey Environment Prepared to: Submitted by: Kavram Enerji AECOM Turkey Ankara, Turkey AECOM-TR-R-765-01-01 October 2014 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment for Uluborlu Wind Farm Project in Isparta, Turkey Başak Şentürk, Biologist, BS Gizem Güngör, Environmental Engineer, BS Hüseyin Akyol, Environmental Engineer, BS Merve Dilber, Sociologist, BS Okan Can, Biologist, BS, MS Şafak Eker, Geological Engineer, BS ______________________________ Prepared by Arzu Ertuğrul, Project Manager, Chemist, MS ______________________________ Reviewed by AECOM Mustafa Kemal Mahallesi, Dumlupınar Bulvarı No: 266 Tepe Prime B Blok Suite: 51 Cankaya 06800 Ankara Turkey T: +90-312-442-9863 F: +90-312-442-9864 www.aecom.com October 2014 Report No.: AECOM-TR-R-765-01-01 AECOM Report Environment i Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background to the Project ............................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose and Scope of the ESIA ...................................................................................... 2 2.0 LEGAL FRAMEWORK ...................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Turkish Environmental Legislation .................................................................................. 4 2.1.1 Environmental Impact Assessment .................................................................. 6 2.1.2 Air Quality ........................................................................................................... 7 2.1.3 Wastewater ........................................................................................................ 9 2.1.4 Soil Pollution .................................................................................................... 10 2.1.5 Noise ................................................................................................................ 10 2.1.6 Waste ............................................................................................................... 11 2.2 International Conventions Adopted by Turkey .............................................................. 16 2.3 Equator Principles .......................................................................................................... 16 2.4 IFC/World Bank Group Environmental, Health, and Safety Guidelines ...................... 18 2.4.1 Noise ................................................................................................................ 20 2.4.2 Air Emissions and Ambient Air Quality ........................................................... 21 2.4.3 Wastewater and Ambient Water Quality ......................................................... 21 2.4.4 Hazardous Materials ........................................................................................ 21 2.4.5 Waste Management ........................................................................................ 22 2.5 EBRD Performance Requirements ............................................................................... 23 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................... 26 3.1 Proposed Project ............................................................................................................ 26 3.2 Project Objective ............................................................................................................ 26 3.3 Project Background ........................................................................................................ 27 3.4 Project Location.............................................................................................................. 29 3.5 Project Technical Characteristics .................................................................................. 36 3.6 Shipment and Access .................................................................................................... 36 3.7 Project Construction ....................................................................................................... 37 3.8 Project Operation and Maintenance .............................................................................. 38 AECOM-TR-R-765-01-01 October 2014 AECOM Report Environment ii 3.9 Project Decommissioning .............................................................................................. 39 3.10 Work Force ..................................................................................................................... 39 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE ....................................................................................... 41 4.1 General Climatology of the Region ............................................................................... 41 4.2 Air Quality ....................................................................................................................... 43 4.3 Land Use and Land Ownership ..................................................................................... 44 4.4 Background Noise Levels .............................................................................................. 46 4.4.1 Noise Sensitive Receptor ................................................................................ 46 4.4.2 Noise Survey .................................................................................................... 48 4.4.3 Measured Background Noise Levels .............................................................. 48 4.5 Geology .......................................................................................................................... 52 4.5.1 Regional Geology ............................................................................................ 52 4.5.2 Local Geology .................................................................................................. 54 4.6 Seismicity ....................................................................................................................... 55 4.7 Hydrogeology ................................................................................................................. 56 4.8 Flora and Fauna ............................................................................................................. 59 4.9 Naturally Protected Areas .............................................................................................. 88 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ......................................................................................... 90 5.1 Noise ............................................................................................................................... 92 5.1.1 Construction ..................................................................................................... 92 5.1.2 Operation ......................................................................................................... 95 5.1.3 Decommissioning .......................................................................................... 101 5.2 Air Emissions ................................................................................................................ 101 5.2.1 Construction ................................................................................................... 101 5.2.2 Operation ....................................................................................................... 106 5.2.3 Decommissioning .......................................................................................... 107 5.3 Water Supply and Wastewater .................................................................................... 107 5.3.1 Construction ................................................................................................... 107 5.3.2 Operation ....................................................................................................... 108 5.3.3 Decommissioning .......................................................................................... 108 5.4 Hazardous Waste......................................................................................................... 108 5.4.1 Construction ................................................................................................... 108 AECOM-TR-R-765-01-01 October 2014 AECOM Report Environment iii 5.4.2 Operation ....................................................................................................... 109 5.4.3 Decommissioning .......................................................................................... 110 5.5 Non - Hazardous Solid Waste ..................................................................................... 110 5.5.1 Construction ................................................................................................... 110 5.5.2 Operation ....................................................................................................... 111 5.5.3 Decommissioning .......................................................................................... 111 5.6 Medical Wastes ............................................................................................................ 112 5.7 Soil and Groundwater .................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Agricultural Sector Survey
    Report No. 1684-TU Turkey Agricultural Sector Survey (In Two Volumes) Public Disclosure Authorized Volume II: Annexes June 23, 1978 Projects Department Europe, Middle East and North Africa Regional Office FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Document of the World Bank This docUment has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents mray not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS- DECEMBER 1976 / US$1.00 = 16.5 Turkish Lira (LT) LT 1.00 = us$o.o6 WEIGHTS AND MEASURES Metric System British/US System 1 kilogram (kg) = 2.2 pounds 1 metric ton (ton) = 2,205 pounds 1 millimeter (mm) = 0.04 inch 1 meter (m) = 3.28 feet 1 kilometer (km) = 0.62 mile 1 hectare (ha)=10 deca es (da) = 2.47 acre 1 square kilometer (kmc) = 0.386 square mile 1 liter (1) = 0.264 gallon 1 cubic meter (m3 ) = 35.28 cubic feet 1 million cubic meters (Mm3) = 810.7 acre feet 1 liter per second (1/sec) = 0.04 cubic feet per second GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS DSI - Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources' General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works EBK - Meat and Fish Organization FFYP - First Five-Year Plan (1963-1967) LRO - Land Reform Organization MA - Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock MF - Ministry of Forestry MVA - Ministry of Village Affairs SEE - State Economic Enterprise SFYP - Second Five-Year Plan (1968-1972) SIS - State Institute of Statistics SPO - State Planning Organization TCZB - Agricultural Bank TEK - Turkish Electricity Authority TFYP - Third Five-Year Plan (1973-1977) TMO - Soil Products Office TOPRAKSU- MVA's General Directorate of Land and Water Resources Development TSEK - Milk Organization TSF - Turkish Sugar Factories Corporation TZDK - Agricultural Supply Organization GOVERNMENT OF TURKEY FISCAL YEAR March 1 - February 28 LI At the time of the mission's visit to Turkey, On March 31, 1978, the exchange rate was US$1,00 = 25,25 LT.
    [Show full text]
  • 18 Aceitação Para Publicação: 16/09/2019
    Economic analysis of sheep farms: a case study of Isparta Province, Turkey 64 Dalgic, A.; Demircan, V. Economic analysis of sheep farms: a case study of Isparta Province, Turkey Recebimento dos originais: 25/03/2018 Aceitação para publicação: 16/09/2019 Asli Dalgic M.Sc in Agricultural Economics Institution: Isparta University of Applied Sciences Address: Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technologies, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, 32260, Isparta, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected] Vecdi Demircan (Corresponding author) Ph.D in Agricultural Economics Institution: Isparta University of Applied Sciences Address: Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technologies, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, 32260, Isparta, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The purpose of this study was to carry out the economic analysis of sheep farming in Isparta province, Turkey. The primary material of the study was comprised of original data acquired via survey method from a total of 80 farms determined by way of stratified sampling method. Accordingly, the farms were classified according to their size as 1st group (1-100 sheep, 23 farms), 2nd group (101-200 sheep, 22 farms) and 3rd group (>200 sheep, 35 farms). It was determined based on the study results that the production costs per animal unit (AU) decreases and net profit increases with increasing farm size. Indeed, production costs per animal unit in 1st, 2nd and 3rd group farms were determined as 5 424.13 TL, 4 221.83TL and 3 450.79 TL respectively, whereas net profits were determined as 2 467.26 TL, 2 761.26 TL and 3 314.77 TL.
    [Show full text]
  • Herpetofaunistic Diversity of the Cres-Lošinj Archipelago (Croatian Adriatic)
    University of Sopron Roth Gyula Doctoral School of Forestry and Wildlife Management Sciences Ph.D. thesis Herpetofaunistic diversity of the Cres-Lošinj Archipelago (Croatian Adriatic) Tamás Tóth Sopron 2018 Roth Gyula Doctoral School of Forestry and Wildlife Management Sciences Nature Conservation Program Supervisors: Prof. Dr. Faragó Sándor Dr. Gál János Introduction In recent years the Croatian islands, especially those of the Cres-Lošinj Archipelago became the focus of research of herpetologists. However, in spite of a long interest encompassing more than a hundred years, numerous gaps remain in our herpetological knowledge. For this reason, the author wished to contribute to a better understanding by performing studies outlined below. Aims The first task was to map the distribution of amphibians and reptiles inhabiting the archipelago as data were lacking for several of the smaller islands and also the fauna of the bigger islands was insufficiently known. Subsequently, the faunistic information derived from the scientific literature and field surveys conducted by the author as well as available geological and paleogeological data were compared and analysed from a zoogeographic point of view. The author wished to identify regions of the islands boasting the greatest herpetofaunal diversity by creating dot maps based on collecting localities. To answer the question which snake species and which individuals are going to be a victim of the traffic snake roadkill and literature survey were used. The author also identified where are the areas where the most snakes are hit by a vehicle on Cres. By gathering road-killed snakes and comparing their locality data with published occurrences the author seeked to identify species most vulnerable to vehicular traffic and road sections posing the greatest threat to snakes on Cres Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Uluborlu Alâeddin Camii
    Uluborlu Alâeddin Camii Özet al›flmam›z, Isparta ‹li Uluborlu ilçesi eski yerlefliminde yer alan Alâeddin Camii üzerine, bir tan›t›m ve belgeleme niteli¤indedir. Eski Uluborlu, Ortaça¤dan Cumhuriyetin ilk Ç y›llar›na kadar önemli bir yerleflim yeridir. Alâeddin Camii, mevcut kitabe ve kaynaklara göre; XIII. yüzy›lda infla edilmifltir. Yap›; XX. yüzy›l›n bafllar›nda ç›kan bir yang›n sonras›nda büyük ölçüde zarar görmesiyle, yöre halk› taraf›ndan yeniden infla ettirilmifltir. Yap› planlama aç›s›ndan; kuzey- güney do¤rultusunda, dikdörtgen bir mekân kurgusuna sahiptir. Harim k›sm›, üç sah›na ayr›l›p orta sah›nda, dairesel ve oval biçimli kubbeler, yan sah›nlarda ise dairesel formda küçük kubbeler yer almaktad›r. Süslemeleri, XIX.-XX. yüzy›l bezeme anlay›fl›nda, yöresel tarzda yap›lm›flt›r. Anahtar Kelimeler: Uluborlu, Alâeddin Camii, XIX.-XX. Yüzy›l Osmanl› Mimarisi Uluborlu Alâeddin Mosque Abstract Alâeddin Mosque; Uluborlu Castle, located outside the old city walls in Uluborlu in Isparta. Old Uluborlu, from the middle ages to the early years of the Republic is an important settlement area. The ruins that remain from these periods are important determining factors for the settlement of Uluborlu. According to the available inscription and resources, Alâeddin Mosque was built in XIII. Century. The structure that existes today was rebuild by the local people after fire, in the early XX. Century. in terms of the type of Structure-planning, it has the north-south direction in a rectangular space. Harim part, divided into three sections, and the in middle sahn, there are circular and oval form of domes, in right and left sides, there are small domes.
    [Show full text]
  • Yenice Köyü Köprüsü Ve Miryokefalon Savaşi Yenice
    Eylül 2010 Cilt:18 No:3 Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi 997-1012 YENİCE KÖYÜ KÖPRÜSÜ VE MİRYOKEFALON SAVAŞI Ramazan Topraklı Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Tarih Öğretmenliği Bölümü, Ankara Özet Miryokefalon savaşı, 1071’deki Malazgirt Savaşı’nı müteakip kurulan Türkiye Selçuklu Devleti’nin Anadolu’da var olma mücadelesidir. 1176 yılında Doğu Roma İmparatorluğu ile yapılan Miryokefalon Savaşı’nın yeri konusunda çeşitli görüşler vardır. Bu görüşlerden önemlileri savaş alanını, Kundanlı, Karamık Beli, Çivril ve Gelendost Fatlın Ovası olarak göstermektedir. Bu çalışmada bunlardan farklı, yeni bir görüş tarih camiasına sunulmuştur. Anahtar Kelimeler: Miryokefalon Savaşı, Türkiye Selçuklu Devleti, Doğu Roma İmparatorluğu, Yenice köyü köprüsü. YENİCE VILLAGE BRIDGE AND MYRIAKEPHALON WAR Abstract The Myriakephalon (Tribritze) War, the struggle of the Turkey Seljukid State for existence in Anatolia afterwards the Manzigert victory. There are various thoughts about the true place of the Myriakephalon War, happened in 1176, between the East Roman Empire and the Turkey Seljukids State. Subtantials from these, signing about the war place Kundanlı, Karamık Beli, Çivril and Gelendost Fatlın Plain. In this paper, a distinctive sight are presented to historians except former idias newly. Key Words: Myriakephalon (Tribritze) War, Seljukid Sultanate of Rum, East Roman Empire, Yenice village bridge. 1. Giriş Türkiye’nin en güzel köşelerinden biri olan Hamideli diyarının tarihini öğren- mek için Devlet Arşivleri’nden konuyla ilgili kitapları incelerken Afşar kazasına bağ- lı “Yenice köyü köprüsü” diye bir ibare dikkatimizi çekmişti. Maamafih, bölgede daha başka köprüler veya yapılar kayıt altına alınmazken, sadece Yenice köyü köprüsünün vakıf konusu olması ve vakıf defterine yazılmış olması ayrıca dikkatimizi çeken bir nokta olmuştur. Özellikle Hamidoğulları Beyliği, Türkiye Selçuklu Devleti’nin bıraktığı tekke, za- viye, mescit, cami, medrese, kervansaray ve bunların vakıflarını sağlam muhafaza et- meyi başarmış, daha da önemlisi bunları hizmet hâlinde Osmanlıya devretmiştir.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing the Aspects of International Migration in Turkey by Using 2000
    MiReKoc MIGRATION RESEARCH PROGRAM AT THE KOÇ UNIVERSITY ______________________________________________________________ MiReKoc Research Projects 2005-2006 Analyzing the Aspects of International Migration in Turkey by Using 2000 Census Results Yadigar Coşkun Address: Kırkkonoaklar Mah. 202. Sokak Utku Apt. 3/1 06610 Çankaya Ankara / Turkey Email: [email protected] Tel: +90. 312.305 1115 / 146 Fax: +90. 312. 311 8141 Koç University, Rumelifeneri Yolu 34450 Sarıyer Istanbul Turkey Tel: +90 212 338 1635 Fax: +90 212 338 1642 Webpage: www.mirekoc.com E.mail: [email protected] Table of Contents Abstract....................................................................................................................................................3 List of Figures and Tables .......................................................................................................................4 Selected Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................5 1. Introduction..........................................................................................................................................1 2. Literature Review and Possible Data Sources on International Migration..........................................6 2.1 Data Sources on International Migration Data in Turkey..............................................................6 2.2 Studies on International Migration in Turkey..............................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Xv-Xvi. Yüzyillarda Menteşe, Hamid Ve Teke Sancaği
    I T. C. SÜLEYMAN DEM İREL ÜN İVERS İTES İ SOSYAL B İLİMLER ENST İTÜSÜ TAR İH ANAB İLİM DALI XV-XVI. YÜZYILLARDA MENTE ŞE, HAM İD VE TEKE SANCA ĞI YÖRÜKLER İ DOKTORA TEZ İ Serkan SARI Tez Danı şmanı: Prof. Dr. FAHRETT İN TIZLAK ISPARTA, 2008 II III ÖZET XV-XVI. YÜZYILLARDA MENTE ŞE, HAM İD VE TEKE SANCA ĞI YÖRÜKLER İ Serkan SARI Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Tarih Bölümü Doktora Tezi, 417 sayfa, A ğustos, 2008 Danı şman: Prof. Dr. Fahrettin TIZLAK Bir kavram olarak Yörük kelimesi, Türklerin Anadolu’ya akmaya ba şlamaları ve aynı zamanda yerle şik hayata hızla yönelmeleri ile ortaya çıkmı ştır. Eski geleneksel tarzını devam ettirmek isteyen Türkmen gurupları bu adla adlandırılmaya ba şlanılmı ştır. Yörüklü ğü, yalnızca üretim tarzına ba ğlı olarak, konargöçer hayatı devam ettiren guruplar olarak nitelendirmek meselenin tam anlamıyla anla şılmasına imkan vermez. Bunlar, yüz yılların geli ştirdi ği bir anlayı ş ve hayat tarzını devam ettiren guruplar olarak görülmelidir. Elbette ki Yörükler için hayvanları ve onlar için verimli otlaklar bulmak olmazsa olmaz şartların ba şında gelir; ama Yörüklü ğü yalnızca bu boyutla alakalı bir mesele olarak görmek Yörüklerin hayat tarzını tam olarak açıklamaz. Konargöçer hayat Yörüklü ğün önemli bir hususiyetidir. Lakin bu gün bile yıllardır konargöçerli ği bırakmı ş fakat Yörüklü ğünü unutmamı ş guruplar bulmak mümkündür. Bilindi ği üzere Osmanlı’nın uyguladı ğı tımar sisteminde topra ğı işleyen reayanın göç etmesine müsaade edilmemi ştir. Göç edenlere ise çift bozan resmi gibi cezalar verilmi ştir. Böyle bir yapı içerisinde Yörüklerin durumu ilgi çekicidir. Çalı şmalarımızda Yörük cemaatlerinin azımsanmayacak nüfuslara sahip oldukları görülmektedir.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Analysis of Orcharding in the Isparta Province (Turkey)
    Bulletin of Geography. Socio–economic Series No. 23 (2014): 119–134 Bulletin of GeoGraphy. Socio–economic SerieS journal homepages: http://www.bulletinofgeography.umk.pl http://versita.com/bgss ISSN 1732–4254 quarterly current analysis of orcharding in the isparta province (turkey) Sevil Sargin1, cDFMR, ramazan okudum2, DFM 1Marmara University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Geography, Göztepe Campus, 34722/Kadıköy Istanbul, Turkey, e-mail: [email protected] (corresponding author); 2Yuzuncu Yil University, Faculty of Arts, Department of Geography, Zeve Campus, 65080, Van, Turkey, e-mail: [email protected] Sargin, S. and Okudum, R., 2014: Current analysis of orcharding in the Isparta Province (Turkey). In: Szymańska, D. and Biegańska, J. editors, Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, No. 23, Toruń: Nicolaus Copernicus University Press, pp. 119–134. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/bog-2014-0008 abstract. In this study, orcharding activity in the Isparta Province, Turkey, is an- article details: alysed. Until a few years ago, the economy of Isparta was associated with hand Received: 14 June 2013 carpet weaving, rose-growing and rose-oil extraction. However, over the last few Revised: 16 August 2013 years orcharding has attracted attention as the most important economic activity Accepted: 22 November 2013 in Isparta. This is especially visible in the districts of Eğirdir, Gelendost, Senirkent and Yalvaç where many kinds of fruits, specifically apples and cherries, are grown for the market. Physical geography features of Isparta have an important poten- tial for developing orcharding. Suitable climatic conditions, fertile soils and fresh water resources, both surface and underground, are distinctive elements of this potential.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Sütçüler District of Isparta Province in Terms of Rural Tourism
    DOI: 10.21325/jotags.2017.90 Assessment of Sütçüler District of Isparta Province in Terms of Rural Tourism İpek ÜNALa, *Gül ERKOL BAYRAMb a Süleyman Demirel University, Yalvaç Vocational School, Department of Travel, Tourism and Entertainment, Isparta/Turkey b Sinop University, Collage of Tourism and Hotel Management, Department of Tourism Guidance, Sinop/Turkey Article History Abstract Received: 07.06.2017 In today’s world, bored of daily life standards, people prefer silence and activities within the nature in search of change. Therefore it has become a necessity to create places that Accepted: 07.09.2017 will bring together people and nature. Recently, rural community has regarded tourism as an opportunity to sustain or revive their economy. This study aims to assess the tourism Keywords potential of Sütçüler District. For this purpose, a questinnaire was applied to local people of Sütçüler District of Isparta Province using instant research method. SPSS statistics Rural Tourism program was used to analyze data collected during reasearch. Besides descriptive statistics Rural Development (average, frequency, percentage distribution and standard deviation), t test and ANOVA methods were used in analysis. Local People Rural Hospitality * Corresponding Author. E-mail: [email protected] (G. Erkol Bayram) 190 Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies 5/3 (2017) 190-206 INTRODUCTION Globalization trend throughout the world has caused markets to be more competitive and therefore caused distribution of income to worsen gradually. As a result, regional inequality problems is getting more clear everyday. Considering the facts that rural community have to live within the nature, that their basic economic activities are those that have very low added value such asagriculture, livestock, fishing, handcrafts and forestry and that infrastructure works are not enough in general; difficulties of living in these areas gets more clear.
    [Show full text]
  • Yapilaşmiş Kirsal Habitusun Değişimi: Üç Köy Okumasi
    SAD / JSR Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi / Journal of Sociological Research Cilt / Volume 20 Sayı / Number 1 (Nisan / April 2017) : (201-236) YAPILAŞMIŞ KIRSAL HABİTUSUN DEĞİŞİMİ: ÜÇ KÖY OKUMASI Pervin ŞENOL1 N. Serpil ALTUNTEK2 ÖZ Türkiye’de kentsel alanların yanı sıra kırsal alanlar da çok boyutlu değişim süreci içindedir. Bu çalışmada, değişime direnme, uyarlanma veya karşı stratejiler geliştirme biçimlerini anlayabilmek için modernleşmeci kuramdan ziyade bireyi aktif bir eyleyici olarak ele alan Pierre Bourdieu’nün eylem kuramının açımlayıcı perspektifine başvurulmuş; dışsal faktörlerin dönüştürücü etkinliği karşısında farklı kırsal yerleşmelerde eyleyicilerin geliştirdikleri uyarlanma stratejilerinin nasıl farklılık gösterdiği sorusuna üç farklı kırsal yerleşim örneği üzerinden yanıt aranmıştır. 2013-2016 yılları arasında derinlemesine görüşme ve doğrudan gözlem tekniklerini kullanarak gerçekleştirilen alan araştırmasında, Isparta ili Gönen ilçesine bağlı Kızılcık, Baladız (Gümüşgün) ve İğdecik köylerindeki değişim farkı, bu yerleşimlerdeki eyleyicilerin tarihsel olarak içselleştirdiği eylem hatlarında ve sahip oldukları sermaye türüne ve hacmine dayanan uyarlanma stratejilerindeki farkta aranmıştır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Kırsal Değişme, Kırsal Farklılıklar, Eylem Kuramı, Toplumsal Uzam, Pierre Bourdieu, Isparta 1 Yrd. Doç. Dr. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Mimarlık Fakültesi, Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Bölümü 2 Prof. Dr. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi, Antropoloji Bölümü SAD / JSR 201 Cilt / Volume 20 Sayı / Number
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration Institute of Turkey
    BULLETIN OF THE MINERAL RESEARCH AND EXPLORATION INSTITUTE OF TURKEY Foreign Edition October 1981 -April 1982 Number : 97/98 CONTENTS Stratigraphy and sedimentary evolution of the Antalya Complex: Isparta province, Turkey f.W.F. Waldron 1 Petrology and interpretation of the Origin of Quaternary volcanics in the Dat9a Peninsula . .. Tuncay Ercan; Erdoğdu Günay; Halil Baş and Bülent Can 21 Structural investigation of Guleman (Elazığ) ophiolite Yuzuf Ziya Özkan 32 On the Presence of Villania (Ammonoidea) in Turkey Füsun Alkaya 40 Induced Polarization method on lignite prospection of Muğla-Tınas M. Işık Turgay 44 New discoveries in the mining history of Turkey in the neighborhood of Gümüşköy, Kütahya Ergun Kaptan 60 A note on the occurence of Permo-Carboniferous in the southeast of Afyon region Bilge Erişen 68 Blueschists discovered1 east of Saros Bay in thrace Kamil Şentürk and Aral I. Okay 72 Abstracts of the papers published only in the Turkish edition of this bulletin 76 Bu nüshada yazı işlerini fiilen idare edenler-Editors: Ziver ÖNCEL-Özcan YAZLAK GENERAL DIRECTOR M. Sıtkı SANCAR EDITORIAL BOARD Ziver ÖNCEL (President) Tandoğan ENGİN M. Cemal GÖNCÜOĞLU İsmail HENDEN Ercüment SİREL Okan TEKELİ Evren YAZGAN Özcan YAZLAK Aykut YILDIRIM PUBLICATION MANAGER Mualla ERGUN SECRETARY Fügen MUTLUER POSTAL ADDRESS Maden Tetkik ve Arama Enstitüsü Genel Direktörlüğü Redaksiyon Kurulu Sekreterliği Ankara - TURKEY The Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration Institute (MTA) is published twice yearly. Each issiue appears in Turkish and foreign editions. The Bulletin can be purchased directly or by post from: Maden Tetkik ve Arama Enstitüsü, Bilimsel Dokümantasyon ve Yayın Dairesi, Neşriyat Servisi, Ankara - TURKEY.
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of Inorganic Elements in Poppy Straw by Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive Spectrometry As a Means of Ascertaining Origin
    Determination of inorganic elements in poppy straw by scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectrometry as a means of ascertaining origin E. ÇOPUR Department of Chemistry, Gendarmarie General Command Criminal Laboratory, Ankara, Turkey 4 N. G. GÖGER, and T. ORBEY Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey B. SENER¸ Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey ABSTRACT Cultivation of poppy as a source of opium alkaloids for legitimate medical purposes has a long tradition in Turkey. The main products are poppy straw and concentrate of poppy straw, obtained from dried poppy capsules. The aims of the study reported in the present article were to establish inorganic element profiles for the poppy-growing provinces of Turkey by means of X-ray analysis by scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectrometry (SEM/EDS) and to explore the potential of the technique for determination of origin. Ten elements (sodium, magnesium, silicon, phosphorus, sulphur, chlorine, potassium, calcium, copper and zinc) were analysed in poppy straw samples from 67 towns in nine provinces. As regards the determination of origin, the most significant finding was the presence of copper and zinc in the poppy straw samples from 8 of the 15 towns in Afyon Province. Since those elements are not normally found in soil, it is assumed that their presence is the result of environmental (industrial) contamination. Differences in the samples from the other eight provinces were less signifi- cant, possibly a result of their geographical proximity. Nevertheless, differences in the samples were apparent. Because the findings are relative rather than absolute in terms of presence or absence of individual inorganic elements, further research is required to convert them into operationally usable results.
    [Show full text]