DOCSLIB.ORG

A Review of the UK Financial Conduct Authority's Approach To

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Review of the UK Financial Conduct Authority's Approach To A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Wardrop, Robert; Ziegler, Tania Article A Case of Regulatory Evolution – A Review of the UK Financial Conduct Authority’s Approach to Crowdfunding CESifo DICE Report Provided in Cooperation with: Ifo Institute – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich Suggested Citation: Wardrop, Robert; Ziegler, Tania (2016) : A Case of Regulatory Evolution – A Review of the UK Financial Conduct Authority’s Approach to Crowdfunding, CESifo DICE Report, ISSN 1613-6373, ifo Institut - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung an der Universität München, München, Vol. 14, Iss. 2, pp. 23-32 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/167260 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Forum A CASE OF REGULATORY successful integration of sector regulation, alongside continued government support for alternative finance. EVOLUTION – A REVIEW OF While many member states have opted for a “wait and THE UK FINANCIAL CONDUCT see” approach to crowdfunding regulation, the United Kingdom was of the first nations to create bespoke reg- AUTHORITY’S APPROacH TO ulation for crowdfunding activities. As the regulating CROWDFUNDING body that monitors and supervises crowdfunding ac- tivities in the UK is the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)2, this article will centre on the regulatory regime that it has adopted. ROBERT WarDROP AND 1 The FCA defines crowdfunding as an umbrella term to TANIA ZIEGLER capture various “categories” of activity, some of which are regulated whilst others are not. The general defini- Introduction tion of crowdfunding, according to the FCA is “an inter- net-based business model […] in which people and busi- Across Europe, crowdfunding is quickly moving from a nesses (including start-ups) can try to raise money from fringe funding instrument to becoming a mainstream fi- the public, to support a business, project, campaign or nance channel, connecting “crowds” to fund businesses, individual” (FCA 2016a). This broad term includes four projects and individuals. In its recently published Report sub-categories: on Crowdfunding in the EU Capital Markets Union, the European Commission details the importance of crowd- • Donation-based crowdfunding: people give funding as “an important source of non-bank financing money to enterprises or organisations whose activi- in support of job creation, economic growth and com- ties they want to support. petitiveness” (European Commission 2016). While there • Pre-payment or rewards-based crowdfunding: remains no harmonised regulatory framework applica- people give money in return for a reward, service or ble to crowdfunding across Europe, individual mem- product (such as concert tickets, an innovative prod- ber states have adopted national regulatory approaches uct, or a computer game). to supervise crowdfunding activities – “tailoring their • Loan-based crowdfunding: also known as “peer- regulatory frameworks to the characteristics and needs to-peer lending”, this is where consumers lend mon- of local markets and investors, which results in differ- ey in return for interest payments and a repayment of ences on how the rules are designed and implemented” capital over time. (European Commission 2016, 4-5). This article will • Investment-based crowdfunding: consumers in- focus on the regulatory regime in the United Kingdom vest directly or indirectly in new or established that regulates and supervises online alternative finance businesses by buying investments such as shares or activities that fall under the crowdfunding umbrella. debentures (FCA 2016a). The first two categories are exempt from regulatory The United Kingdom is the leader in online alternative oversight from the FCA, as the party providing funds finance in the European market, accounting for just does so for altruistic purposes or to receive a “reward”, under 75 percent of all transaction volumes in Europe rather than to profit financially. As such, these two cat- (Wardrop et al. 2015). In 2015, online alternative finance 2 It should be noted that the financial regulation of crowdfunding of- in the United Kingdom grew to GBP 3.2 billion, increas- ten involves several other government bodies or agencies, including HM Treasury, the Prudential Regulation Authority, etc. Although other ing by 84 percent from GBP 1.74 billion in 2014 (Zhang agencies and bodies have impacted the way in which crowdfunding has et al. 2016). Sizeable growth in 2015 coincided with developed in the UK, this article will only review the regulatory regime put in place by the FCA, as the FCA serves as the key regulator and supervisor of crowdfunding activity in the UK. Discussion of policy or 1 Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance (CCAF) and Cambridge regulation that overlaps with additional government agencies will only Judge Business School (both). be discussed in the context of how activity is supervised by the FCA. 23 CESifo DICE Report 2/2016 (June) Forum Table 1 Alternative finance models Model name FCA Crowdfunding Category Definition Peer-to-Peer Business Secured and unsecured debt-based transactions between Loan-based Crowdfunding individuals/institutions and businesses with trading history; Lending most of which are SMEs. Property-based debt transactions between Peer-to-Peer Business Loan-based Crowdfunding individuals/institutions to businesses; most of which are Lending (Real Estate) property developers. Peer-to-Peer Consumer Loan-based Crowdfunding Debt–based transactions between individuals/institutions Lending to an individual; most are unsecured personal loans. Businesses sell their invoices or receivables to a pool of Invoice Trading Loan-based Crowdfunding primarily high net worth individuals or institutional investors. Investment-based Sale of registered securities, by mostly early stage firms, Equity-based Crowdfunding Crowdfunding to both retail, sophisticated and institutional investors. Direct investment into a property by individuals, usually Equity-based Crowdfunding Investment-based through the sale of a registered security in a special purpose (Real Estate) Crowdfunding vehicle (SPV). Individuals purchase debt-based securities (typically a bond Investment-based Debt-based securities Crowdfunding or debenture) at a fixed interest rate. Lenders receive full repayment plus interest paid at full maturity. Donors have an expectation that fund recipients will provide Reward-based Pre-payment or rewards-based Crowdfunding Crowdfunding a tangible but non-financial reward or product in exchange for their contributions. This model falls outside of FCA purview. Non-investment model in which no legally binding financial Donation-based Donation-based obligation is incurred by fund recipients to donors; no Crowdfunding Crowdfunding financial or material returns are expected by the donor. This model falls outside of FCA purview. Source: Zhang et al. 2016. egories fall outside of the FCA remit and are exempt “social promotion” and “P2P Advice” were set forth in from requiring FCA authorisation in order to operate. 2016, this review document serves as the most compre- The second two categories are monitored and super- hensive analysis of the authorisation process for invest- vised by the FCA, as these categories are transactional ment-based and loan-based crowdfunding. activities where financial profit is possible for the indi- vidual funder. Given the broad definition employed by the FCA, Table 1 indicates the category under which Investment-based crowdfunding key alternative finance models fall within. These model definitions are based upon the working industry taxon- Investment-based crowdfunding, as noted above, re- omy created by the Cambridge Centre for Alternative lates to activities in which individuals invest in unlist- Finance and its research partners (Zhang et al. 2016). ed shares or debt securities issued by a business. At the time of the February 2015 review, the FCA publically In February 2015, the FCA published its review on the acknowledged the full authorisation of ten firms as of state of crowdfunding since the sector fell under its aus- 1 April 2014, with an additional four platforms receiving pices in April 2014, pending a transition period for key authorisation by the end of 2014. The document noted an activities (FCA 2015a). Examining the implementation additional ten applications in review at the start of 2015. of the new crowdfunding
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Crowdfunding in Asia
    Crowdfunding in Asia May 2018 Introducing the first free directory of crowdfunding platforms across Asia. The data is based on the AlliedCrowds Capital Finder, a database of over 7,000 alternative finance capital providers across emerging markets. Our data has been used by organizations like FSD Asia, UNDP, World Green Economy Organization, GIZ, World Bank, and others in order to provide unique, actionable insights into the world of emerging market alternative finance. This is the latest of our regular reports on alternative finance in emerging markets; you can find all previous reports here. Crowdfunding rose in prominence in the post-financial crisis years (starting in 2012), and for good reason: a global credit crunch limited the amount of funding available to entrepreneurs and small businesses. Since then, crowdfunding has grown rapidly around the world. Crowdfunding is especially consequential in countries where SMEs find it difficult to raise capital to start or grow their businesses. This is the case in many Asian countries; according to the SME Finance Forum, there is a $2.3 trillion MSME credit gap in East Asia and the Pacific. Crowdfunding can help to fill this gap by offering individuals and small businesses an alternative source of capital. This can come in the form of donation-based as well as lending-based (peer-to-peer or peer-to-business) crowdfunding. In order to help entrepreneurs and small business owners to find the crowdfunding platform that’s right for them, we are releasing the first publicly available list of all crowdfunding platforms across Asia. The report is split into two key sections: the first one is an overview of crowdfunding platforms, and how active they are across the largest markets on the continent.
    [Show full text]
  • East Africa Crowdfunding Landscape Study
    REPORT | OCTOBER 2016 East Africa Crowdfunding Landscape Study REDUCING POVERTY THROUGH FINANCIAL SECTOR DEVELOPMENT Seven Things We Learned 1 2 3 4 East African East Africa’s Crowdfunding There’s appetite to crowdfunding platforms report risks and the do business and to markets are on promising regulatory learn more from the move. progress. environment. across East Africa. Crowdfunding platforms Since 2012 M-Changa In Kenya, for example, Over 65 participants at- (donation, rewards, debt has raised $900,000 Section 12A of the Capi- tended the Indaba & and equity) raised $37.2 through 46,000 tal Markets Act provides a Marketplace from all cor- million in 2015 in Kenya, donations to 6,129 safe space for innovations ners of the East African Rwanda, Tanzania and fundraisers. Pesa Zetu to grow before being sub- market. Uganda. By the end of Q1 and LelaFund are also ject to the full regulatory 2016, this figure reached opening access to their regime. $17.8 million – a 170% deals on the platform. year-on-year increase. 5 6 7 East Africa’s MSMEs ex- There are both commercial Global crowdfunding press a demand for alterna- and development oppor- markets are growing tive finance, but they’re not tunities for crowdfunding fast but also evolving. always investment-ready or platforms in East Africa. Finance raised by crowdfunding able to locate financiers. Crowdfunding platforms have the platforms worldwide increased from 45% of Kenyan start-ups sampled re- potential to mobilise and allocate $2.7 billion in 2012 to an estimated quire between $10,000 and $50,000 capital more cheaply and quickly $34 billion in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning and Incentives in Crowd-Powered Systems
    Research Collection Doctoral Thesis Learning and Incentives in Crowd-Powered Systems Author(s): Singla, Adish Publication Date: 2016 Permanent Link: https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-010867044 Rights / License: In Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted This page was generated automatically upon download from the ETH Zurich Research Collection. For more information please consult the Terms of use. ETH Library DISS. ETH N◦ 24034 Learning and Incentives in Crowd-Powered Systems A thesis submitted to attain the degree of DOCTOR OF SCIENCES of ETH ZURICH (Dr. sc. ETH Zurich) presented by ADISH KUMAR SINGLA M. Sc. in Computer Science, EPFL, Switzerland born on 12.03.1984 citizen of India accepted on the recommendation of Prof. Dr. Andreas Krause (ETH Zurich), examiner Prof. Dr. Donald Kossmann (ETH Zurich), co-examiner Prof. Dr. Carla Gomes (Cornell University), co-examiner Dr. Eric Horvitz (Microsoft Research), co-examiner Prof. Dr. David Parkes (Harvard University), co-examiner 2016 Abstract The ongoing technological revolution—fueled by the Internet, mobile computing, and advances in AI—is leading to deep-seated economic and societal changes, and funda- mentally altering our lives in unprecedented ways. An underlying theme of this rev- olution is that the users are increasingly becoming an integral part of computational systems; prominent examples include community-driven services like Airbnb, shared mobility based bike sharing systems, citizen science projects like eBird, community- sensing applications like Waze, online tutoring systems like Coursera, and many more. These emerging crowd-powered systems are opening up exciting new opportunities for industry and science by providing the ability to harness the knowledge/expertise of people at scale and by collecting/analyzing the unprecedented volume of users’ data.
    [Show full text]
  • Marketplace Lending: Opportunities and Challenges for Private Investment Funds Disclaimer
    Marketplace Lending: Opportunities and Challenges for Private Investment Funds Disclaimer This information and any presentation accompanying it (the “Content”) has been prepared by Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP (“SRZ”) for general informational purposes only. It is not intended as and should not be regarded or relied upon as legal advice or opinion, or as a substitute for the advice of counsel. You should not rely on, take any action or fail to take any action based upon the Content. As between SRZ and you, SRZ at all times owns and retains all right, title and interest in and to the Content. You may only use and copy the Content, or portions of the Content, for your personal, non-commercial use, provided that you place all copyright and any other notices applicable to such Content in a form and place that you believe complies with the requirements of the United States’ Copyright and all other applicable law. Except as granted in the foregoing limited license with respect to the Content, you may not otherwise use, make available or disclose the Content, or portions of the Content, or mention SRZ in connection with the Content, or portions of the Content, in any review, report, public announcement, transmission, presentation, distribution, republication or other similar communication, whether in whole or in part, without the express prior written consent of SRZ in each instance. This information or your use or reliance upon the Content does not establish a lawyer-client relationship between you and SRZ. If you would like more information or specific advice of matters of interest to you please contact us directly.
    [Show full text]
  • Crowdlending in Asia: Landscape and Investor Characteristics
    Crowdlending in Asia: Landscape and Investor Characteristics November 2020 2 Table of Contents Overview 3 Methodology Overview 4 Methodology Statement 4 Crowdlending in Asia 5 Text Analytics and Insights 7 Crowdlending Investor Characteristics 15 Survey Analysis and Insights 16 Crowdlending in Asia: Landscape and Investor Characteristics | Findings and Insights | Findings and insights 3 Overview Multiple issues arise with the emergence of crowdlending; these pertain to regulation, risk management and investors’ behaviour. Compared to the non-investment crowdfunding model, crowdlending is the dominant model in the world. As of 2019, crowdlending accounted for more than 95% of the funds raised worldwide, with Asian countries – particularly China – in the lead. In early 2020, China had the largest volume of money-raising transactions from crowdfunding totalling more than 200 billion USD. However, given the industry’s potential growth in Asian countries, multiple issues with crowdfunding practices need to be resolved. Media coverage on crowdlending is increasingly widespread, as seen from how it has become a buzzword within the last few years. Media attention on crowdlending can help us understand media awareness, media framing, and public understanding of the topic. Further, there is a lack of information on distinct characteristics and decision making of crowdfunding investors in the field of investor behaviour. We analysed the news coverage on crowdlending in Asia spanning a ten-year period from 2009 to 2019. We also surveyed crowdlending investors to understand their behaviours when interacting with crowdlending platforms. Our analyses provide insights into the challenges and opportunities of the crowdlending industry in Asia. They also reveal crowdlending investors’ behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Application of Banking Regulation to Online Peer-To-Peer Lending Platforms in South Africa to Counter Systemic Risk
    Investigating the application of banking regulation to online peer-to-peer lending platforms in South Africa to counter systemic risk Tamarin Angela Floyd Student number 16391871 A research project submitted to the Gordon Institute of Business Science, University of Pretoria, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Business Administration. 6 November 2017 i © University of Pretoria ABSTRACT The behaviour and activities of online peer-to-peer lending platforms have evolved in different ways across jurisdictions, not fitting neatly within existing financial regulatory frameworks. Together with the growth momentum of the industry and the cases where losses were suffered, this culminated in a call to regulate peer-to-peer lending platforms adequately. The research presents an analysis of online peer-to-peer lending platforms through the lens of banking theory, questioning whether peer-to-peer platforms are behaving like banks and whether they pose systemic risk. These research questions feed into the ultimate research problem: whether online peer-to-peer lending platforms should be regulated like banks with respect to liquidity and capital requirements. Liquidity and capital requirements were designed to stem systemic risk in financial systems and have been praised as effective tools. Qualitative exploratory research was undertaken with 18 experts in the field. Key findings included that the presence of systemic risk is contingent on the operating structure and legal implications of the peer-to-peer platform. In certain cases, systemic risk could be present and as such liquidity and capital requirements should apply. The scope of the research was restricted to the South African financial system due to the unique nuances of its regulatory framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Pushing Boundaries: the 2015 UK Alternative Finance Industry Report
    PUSHING BOUNDARIES THE 2015 UK ALTERNATIVE FINANCE INDUSTRY REPORT February 2016 Bryan Zhang, Peter Baeck, Tania Ziegler, Jonathan Bone and Kieran Garvey In partnership with with the support of CONTENTS Forewords 04 Introduction 10 About this study 12 The Size and Growth of the UK Online Alternative 13 Finance Market Market Size and Growth by Alternative Financing 14 Models Increasing Share of the Market for Business Funding 19 Market Trends in Alternative Finance 22 Expanding Base of Funders and Fundraisers 23 Market Entrants and Partnership strategies 25 Seeking Growth Through Awareness, Increased 26 Marketing and Forging Partnerships 27 Institutionalisation of the Market Cross-Border Transactions and Internationalisation 30 The Geography and Industries & Sectors of 31 Alternative Finance Industry Perspectives on Regulation, Tax Incentives 33 and Risks Size and Growth of the Different Online 38 Alternative Finance Models Peer-to-Peer Business Lending 39 Peer-to-Peer Business Lending (Real Estate) 40 Peer-to-Peer Consumer Lending 41 Invoice Trading 42 Equity-based Crowdfunding 43 Equity-based Crowdfunding (Real Estate) 44 Reward-based Crowdfunding 45 Community Shares 46 Donation-based Crowdfunding 46 Pension-led Funding 47 Debt-based Securities 47 Conclusion 48 Acknowledgements 50 Endnotes 51 3 ABOUT THE AUTHORS BRYAN ZHANG Bryan Zhang is a Director of the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance and a Research Fellow at the Cambridge Judge Business School. He has co-authored !ve industry reports on alternative !nance. PETER BAECK Peter Baeck is a researcher at Nesta, where he focuses on crowdfunding, peer-to-peer lending and the role of digital technologies in public and social innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • Women in Finance Charter List of 273 Signatories
    Women in Finance Charter List of 273 signatories 68 new Charter signatories announced on 11 July 2018 Links to gender diversity targets to be published here in September Admiral Group AE3 Media Armstrong Wolfe Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited Barrington Hibbert Associates BNP Paribas Personal Finance BondMason Bovill Ltd Bower Recruitment Brooks Macdonald plc Canada Life Coventry Building Society Daiwa Capital Markets Europe Ltd EIS Association Ellis Davies Financial Planning Ltd Engage Financial Services Ltd Equifax Ltd Evolution Financial Planning Fintech Strategic Advisors Ltd Fintellect Recruitment First Wealth LLP Flood Re Ltd Foresight Franklin Templeton Investments GAM Global Processing Services Goji Investments Grant Thornton Hinckley and Rugby Building Society HUBX ICAEW Intermediate Capital Group Investec Asset Management Limited 11 July 2018 11 July 2018 J. P. Morgan Kames Capital plc Lazard & Co Limited Lazard Asset Management Limited LifeSearch Magenta Financial Planning Marsh Ltd Medianett Ltd Mortgages for Businesses Ltd MT Finance Ltd Mustard Seed Impact Ltd National Association of Commercial Finance Brokers Nomura International PIMCO Prytania Solutions Limited Pukka Insure Ltd Rathbone Brothers plc Scottish Equity Partners SDB Bookkeeping Services Semper Capital Management Shepherd Compello Ltd St. James’s Place plc Stonehaven International Sussex Independent Financial Advisers Ltd Tesco Underwriting The British United Provident Association (BUPA) The Meyer Partnership The Mortgage & Insurance Bureau TP
    [Show full text]
  • (P2p) Lending Model in Islamic Finance / Shariah-Compliant Form
    CAPCO ISLAMIC FINANCE CAPABILITY APPLICATION OF PEER TO PEER (P2P) LENDING MODEL IN ISLAMIC FINANCE / SHARIAH-COMPLIANT FORM INTRODUCTION Islamic finance is growing in prominence globally owing to strong interest from consumers due to both theological reasons and its strong ethos of ethical investing. In this environment it is imperative that participants in this sector consider avenues that help with growth acceleration and expanding consumer interest. One of the most interesting avenues for potential expansion is within the alternative finance market, specifically in the P2P lending segment. This paper aims to explore the viability of deploying the P2P lending model in a manner that remains true to the framework of Islamic finance principles such as RIBA (prohibition of interest) and Shariah (prohibition of certain product types). WHAT IS P2P LENDING? P2P lending is a form of finance that enables the exchange however there has been a significant uptick in the invoice of capital without the reliance on a conventional financial lending category for the last three years (From ~£310 million institution to oversee and manage the transactions. This format in 2016 to ~£1.1 billion in 2018)2, this is due to the strong enables the borrowers and lenders to interact directly, usually demand for this service from small to medium sized enterprises facilitated through a web application or platform. (SMEs) and is likely to surge due to the impact of to the socio- economic factors of the past year. P2P lending online can trace its origins to the UK with Zopa being the first firm to market this concept, followed by firms UK Overall Volume Growth (£) such as Prosper and Lending Club in the US.
    [Show full text]
  • Peer-To-Peer Lending Annual Report 2019
    PEER-TO-PEER LENDING STATE OF THE MARKET ANNUAL REPORT 2019 | WWW.ALTFI.COM UK MARKETPLACE ONLINE LENDING RETURNS IN THE FINTEX LISTED DIRECT ADVERTISED IMPAIRMENTS LENDING IN EUROPE REALITY WAY LENDING RETURNS AND DEFAULTS We follow the trends so you can stay ahead of them. P2: We are specialist advisers in the AlternativeRSM Finance space. At RSM, we make it our priority to understand your business so youADVERT can make confident decisions about the future. Experience the power of being understood. Experience RSM | rsmuk.com The UK group of companies and LLPs trading as RSM is a member of the RSM network. RSM is the trading name used by the members of the RSM network. Each member of the RSM network is an independent accounting and consulting firm each of which practises in its own right. The RSM network is not itself a separate legal entity of any description in any jurisdiction. The RSM network is administered by RSM International Limited, a company registered in England and Wales (company number 4040598) whose registered office is at 50 Cannon Street, London EC4N 6JJ. The brand and trademark RSM and other intellectual property rights used by members of the network are owned by RSM International Association, an association governed by article 60 et seq of the Civil Code of Switzerland whose seat is in Zug. 3 INTRODUCTION PEER-TO-PEER LENDING: STATE OF THE UK MARKET After rapid growth from the ashes of the financial crisis, the alternative finance sector appears to be maturing. However, it faces internal and external challenges that will dictate the industry’s long-term viability and success.
    [Show full text]
  • Complex Regulatory Landscape for Fintech an Uncertain Future for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Lending
    White Paper The Complex Regulatory Landscape for FinTech An Uncertain Future for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Lending August 2016 Contents 3 Foreword 4 Acknowledgements 5 List of Abbreviations 6 Executive Summary 8 Global FinTech Snapshot 8 Introduction 8 FinTech Conundrum 8 Major FinTech Markets 9 Market Disparities 10 SME Environment 10 Financing Issues 10 Global SME Lending 10 Job Creation 11 Regulatory Environment 12 Business Models 12 Regulatory and Market Overview 14 Investor Protection and Securities Laws 15 Clearing, Settlement and Segregation of Client Money 16 Risk Retention and Capital Requirements 17 Secondary Servicer Agreements 17 Tax Incentives 18 Promotion of SME Lending 18 Credit Analysis and Underwriting 19 Data Protection 20 Regulatory Reporting 20 Registration and Licensing 21 Debt Collection 21 Interest Rate Regulation 22 Private-Sector Outlook and Concerns 22 Regulatory Uncertainty 23 Transparency, Fraud and Self-Regulation 24 Standardization and Data World Economic Forum 26 Case Study: CreditEase 91-93 route de la Capite CH-1223 Cologny/Geneva 26 Background and Performance Switzerland Tel.: +41 (0)22 869 1212 28 Future Development Plans and Ongoing Concerns Fax: +41 (0)22 786 2744 Email: [email protected] 29 Conclusion www.weforum.org World Economic Forum® © 2016 – All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or Transmitted in any form or by any means, including The views expressed in this White Paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the Photocopying and recording, or by any information World Economic Forum or its Members and Partners. White Papers are submitted to the World Economic Forum as Storage and retrieval system.
    [Show full text]
  • Marketplace Lending a Temporary Phenomenon? Foreword 1
    Marketplace lending A temporary phenomenon? Foreword 1 Executive summary 2 1. What is marketplace lending? 4 2. Marketplace lending: a disruptive threat or a sustaining innovation? 8 3. The relative economics of marketplace lenders vs banks 11 4. The user experience of marketplace lenders vs banks 23 5. Marketplace lending as an asset class 24 6. The future of marketplace lending 30 7. How should incumbents respond? 32 Conclusion 35 Appendix 36 Endnotes 37 Contacts 40 Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (“DTTL”), a UK private company limited by guarantee, and its network of member firms, each of which is a legally separate and independent entity. Please see www.deloitte.co.uk/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of DTTL and its member firms. Deloitte LLP is the United Kingdom member firm of DTTL. This publication has been written in general terms and therefore cannot be relied on to cover specific situations; application of the principles set out will depend upon the particular circumstances involved and we recommend that you obtain professional advice before acting or refraining from acting on any of the contents of this publication. Deloitte LLP would be pleased to advise readers on how to apply the principles set out in this publication to their specific circumstances. Deloitte LLP accepts no duty of care or liability for any loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any material in this publication. © 2016 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved. Deloitte LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registered number OC303675 and its registered office at 2 New Street Square, London EC4A 3BZ, United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]