Investigating the Application of Banking Regulation to Online Peer-To-Peer Lending Platforms in South Africa to Counter Systemic Risk

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Investigating the Application of Banking Regulation to Online Peer-To-Peer Lending Platforms in South Africa to Counter Systemic Risk Investigating the application of banking regulation to online peer-to-peer lending platforms in South Africa to counter systemic risk Tamarin Angela Floyd Student number 16391871 A research project submitted to the Gordon Institute of Business Science, University of Pretoria, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Business Administration. 6 November 2017 i © University of Pretoria ABSTRACT The behaviour and activities of online peer-to-peer lending platforms have evolved in different ways across jurisdictions, not fitting neatly within existing financial regulatory frameworks. Together with the growth momentum of the industry and the cases where losses were suffered, this culminated in a call to regulate peer-to-peer lending platforms adequately. The research presents an analysis of online peer-to-peer lending platforms through the lens of banking theory, questioning whether peer-to-peer platforms are behaving like banks and whether they pose systemic risk. These research questions feed into the ultimate research problem: whether online peer-to-peer lending platforms should be regulated like banks with respect to liquidity and capital requirements. Liquidity and capital requirements were designed to stem systemic risk in financial systems and have been praised as effective tools. Qualitative exploratory research was undertaken with 18 experts in the field. Key findings included that the presence of systemic risk is contingent on the operating structure and legal implications of the peer-to-peer platform. In certain cases, systemic risk could be present and as such liquidity and capital requirements should apply. The scope of the research was restricted to the South African financial system due to the unique nuances of its regulatory framework. ii © University of Pretoria KEYWORDS Online P2P lending platform Systemic risk Banking regulation Liquidity and capital requirements iii © University of Pretoria DECLARATION I declare that this research project is my own work. It is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Business Administration at the Gordon Institute of Business Science, University of Pretoria. It has not been submitted before for any degree or examination in any other University. I further declare that I have obtained the necessary authorisation and consent to carry out this research. Tamarin Angela Floyd 6 November 2017 iv © University of Pretoria ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS B/S Balance sheet (in the context of the code names) Cat(‘s) In the context of the code names, this refers to the categories of P2P operating structure (per section 2.1.4) CEO Chief Executive Officer COO Chief Operations Officer GFC Great Financial Crisis of 2008 Insto’s Institutions (in the context of the code names) MD Managing Director NCA National Credit Act NCR National Credit Regulator P2P Peer-to-peer p. Previous(ly) (in the context of the code names) Req Requirements (in the context of the code names) SEC Securities Exchange Commission SME Small and medium sized enterprise UK United Kingdom US United States of America # Number * Indicates that a code is inductive v © University of Pretoria TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................. ii KEYWORDS ................................................................................................................iii DECLARATION ...........................................................................................................iv ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................... v LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................ x LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................xi 1. CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH PROBLEM ............................ 1 1.1 Background to the research problem .............................................................. 1 1.1.1 Defining FinTech ..................................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Defining peer-to-peer lending .................................................................. 2 1.1.3 Comparing P2P lenders with traditional banks ........................................ 3 1.2 Research problem, purpose and motivation ................................................... 4 1.2.1 Introduction to the research problem ....................................................... 4 1.2.2 Objectives of the research ....................................................................... 5 1.2.3 Academic motivation ............................................................................... 5 1.2.4 Business motivation ................................................................................ 6 1.3 Research scope ............................................................................................. 7 1.4 Principal findings ............................................................................................ 8 2. CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................... 9 2.1 Insight into online P2P lending platforms ........................................................ 9 2.1.1 Existing P2P lending platforms and industry statistics ............................. 9 2.1.2 P2P platforms’ functionality and associated risks ...................................12 2.1.3 Online P2P lending platforms consider risks ..........................................14 2.1.4 Categorised P2P operating structures ....................................................15 2.2 Banking theory ..............................................................................................16 2.3 Regulation .....................................................................................................18 2.3.1 What is the role of the bank regulator? ...................................................19 2.3.2 How are online P2P lending platforms currently regulated across jurisdictions? ........................................................................................................19 2.3.3 How are online P2P lending platforms currently regulated in South Africa? 22 2.3.4 Linking banking theory with regulation ....................................................24 vi © University of Pretoria 2.4 Systemic risk .................................................................................................25 2.5 Regulating online P2P lenders like banks......................................................29 3. CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH QUESTIONS .........................................................31 3.1 Research problem .........................................................................................31 3.1.1 Research question one ..........................................................................31 3.1.2 Research question two ...........................................................................31 4. CHAPTER 4: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ..................................................32 4.1 Choice of methodology..................................................................................32 4.2 Research design elements ............................................................................34 4.2.1 Population ..............................................................................................34 4.2.2 Sampling method ...................................................................................35 4.2.3 Sampling size .........................................................................................36 4.2.4 Unit of analysis .......................................................................................37 4.2.5 Measurement instrument ........................................................................37 4.2.6 Data gathering process: in-depth semi-structured interviews .................37 4.2.7 Pre-test ..................................................................................................40 4.2.8 Data analysis .........................................................................................40 4.2.9 Limitations ..............................................................................................43 4.3 The quality of the research ............................................................................43 4.3.1 Credibility ...............................................................................................44 4.3.2 Transferability ........................................................................................45 4.3.3 Dependability .........................................................................................45 4.3.4 Confirmability .........................................................................................46 5. CHAPTER 5: RESULTS ...................................................................................47 5.1 Description of the sample ..............................................................................47 5.2 Saturation analysis ........................................................................................49 5.3 Addressing the research questions ...............................................................50 5.3.1 Research question one: Are online P2P lending platforms behaving like banks? 51 5.3.2 Research question two: Do online P2P lending platforms pose systemic risk
Recommended publications
  • Crowdfunding in Asia
    Crowdfunding in Asia May 2018 Introducing the first free directory of crowdfunding platforms across Asia. The data is based on the AlliedCrowds Capital Finder, a database of over 7,000 alternative finance capital providers across emerging markets. Our data has been used by organizations like FSD Asia, UNDP, World Green Economy Organization, GIZ, World Bank, and others in order to provide unique, actionable insights into the world of emerging market alternative finance. This is the latest of our regular reports on alternative finance in emerging markets; you can find all previous reports here. Crowdfunding rose in prominence in the post-financial crisis years (starting in 2012), and for good reason: a global credit crunch limited the amount of funding available to entrepreneurs and small businesses. Since then, crowdfunding has grown rapidly around the world. Crowdfunding is especially consequential in countries where SMEs find it difficult to raise capital to start or grow their businesses. This is the case in many Asian countries; according to the SME Finance Forum, there is a $2.3 trillion MSME credit gap in East Asia and the Pacific. Crowdfunding can help to fill this gap by offering individuals and small businesses an alternative source of capital. This can come in the form of donation-based as well as lending-based (peer-to-peer or peer-to-business) crowdfunding. In order to help entrepreneurs and small business owners to find the crowdfunding platform that’s right for them, we are releasing the first publicly available list of all crowdfunding platforms across Asia. The report is split into two key sections: the first one is an overview of crowdfunding platforms, and how active they are across the largest markets on the continent.
    [Show full text]
  • Crowdlending in Asia: Landscape and Investor Characteristics
    Crowdlending in Asia: Landscape and Investor Characteristics November 2020 2 Table of Contents Overview 3 Methodology Overview 4 Methodology Statement 4 Crowdlending in Asia 5 Text Analytics and Insights 7 Crowdlending Investor Characteristics 15 Survey Analysis and Insights 16 Crowdlending in Asia: Landscape and Investor Characteristics | Findings and Insights | Findings and insights 3 Overview Multiple issues arise with the emergence of crowdlending; these pertain to regulation, risk management and investors’ behaviour. Compared to the non-investment crowdfunding model, crowdlending is the dominant model in the world. As of 2019, crowdlending accounted for more than 95% of the funds raised worldwide, with Asian countries – particularly China – in the lead. In early 2020, China had the largest volume of money-raising transactions from crowdfunding totalling more than 200 billion USD. However, given the industry’s potential growth in Asian countries, multiple issues with crowdfunding practices need to be resolved. Media coverage on crowdlending is increasingly widespread, as seen from how it has become a buzzword within the last few years. Media attention on crowdlending can help us understand media awareness, media framing, and public understanding of the topic. Further, there is a lack of information on distinct characteristics and decision making of crowdfunding investors in the field of investor behaviour. We analysed the news coverage on crowdlending in Asia spanning a ten-year period from 2009 to 2019. We also surveyed crowdlending investors to understand their behaviours when interacting with crowdlending platforms. Our analyses provide insights into the challenges and opportunities of the crowdlending industry in Asia. They also reveal crowdlending investors’ behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • REGULATION of CROWDLENDING in the EUROPEAN UNION Understanding the Suitableness of EU Legislation for Crowdlending
    REGULATION OF CROWDLENDING IN THE EUROPEAN UNION Understanding the suitableness of EU legislation for crowdlending. Thesis – LL.M International Business Law Aleix Vidal Monés Tilburg University 2017/2018 Student name Aleix Vidal Monés Supervisor Gil-Lemstra, P. (LLM) SNR 233888 Date 2018 ABSTRACT This paper works about the added value of crowdlending as a source of funding, its characteristics opportunities, risks and regulatory implications for the European Union (EU). In concrete, the thesis’ research is mainly focused on discovering whether the European fragmented regulatory scenario it is an appropriate playground for the crowdlending sector development. The conclusions are clear. They point out that the current EU regulatory panorama does not fit the needs of the crowdlending sector. In this sense, legislative action from the EU institutions is required to turn the "state by state" based crowdlending sector into a common European industry. TABLE OF CONTENTS I.- INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 A) Presentation of the topic: ..................................................................................................... 1 B) Prior work on this subject: .................................................................................................... 4 C) Purpose and methodology research: .................................................................................... 5 D) Chapters overview: ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Women in Finance Charter List of 273 Signatories
    Women in Finance Charter List of 273 signatories 68 new Charter signatories announced on 11 July 2018 Links to gender diversity targets to be published here in September Admiral Group AE3 Media Armstrong Wolfe Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited Barrington Hibbert Associates BNP Paribas Personal Finance BondMason Bovill Ltd Bower Recruitment Brooks Macdonald plc Canada Life Coventry Building Society Daiwa Capital Markets Europe Ltd EIS Association Ellis Davies Financial Planning Ltd Engage Financial Services Ltd Equifax Ltd Evolution Financial Planning Fintech Strategic Advisors Ltd Fintellect Recruitment First Wealth LLP Flood Re Ltd Foresight Franklin Templeton Investments GAM Global Processing Services Goji Investments Grant Thornton Hinckley and Rugby Building Society HUBX ICAEW Intermediate Capital Group Investec Asset Management Limited 11 July 2018 11 July 2018 J. P. Morgan Kames Capital plc Lazard & Co Limited Lazard Asset Management Limited LifeSearch Magenta Financial Planning Marsh Ltd Medianett Ltd Mortgages for Businesses Ltd MT Finance Ltd Mustard Seed Impact Ltd National Association of Commercial Finance Brokers Nomura International PIMCO Prytania Solutions Limited Pukka Insure Ltd Rathbone Brothers plc Scottish Equity Partners SDB Bookkeeping Services Semper Capital Management Shepherd Compello Ltd St. James’s Place plc Stonehaven International Sussex Independent Financial Advisers Ltd Tesco Underwriting The British United Provident Association (BUPA) The Meyer Partnership The Mortgage & Insurance Bureau TP
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 FINTECH100 Leading Global Fintech Innovators 2017 FINTECH100
    2018 FINTECH100 Leading Global Fintech Innovators 2017 FINTECH100 Leadin loba Fintec nnovators 1 1 2016 2017 Fintech100 Report FINTECH100 Leadin loba Fintec nnovators Company #00 1 | Fintech Innovators 2016 1 2015 Fintech100 Report FINTECH 100 Leading Global “ Fintech Innovators Report 2015 Company Description At a Glance Tag Line Located Year Founded Key People Website Specialisation Staff Enabler or Disruptor Key Investors Ownership Size User Engagement $ $ $ $ $ The 100 Leading Fintech Innovators Report 2016 Fintech100 Report The 50 Best Fintech Innovators Report 2014 Fintech100 Report 2 About the List The Fintech100 is a collaborative effort between H2 Ventures and KPMG. In its fifth year, the Fintech100 uncovers and evaluates the most innovative Fintech companies globally. The Fintech100 comprises a ‘Top 50’ and an ‘Emerging 50’ and highlights those companies globally that are taking advantage of technology and driving disruption within the financial services industry. A judging panel comprised of senior partners from H2 Ventures and KPMG has decided the final composition of the Fintech100 list. H2 Ventures H2 Ventures is a global thought leader in fintech venture capital investment. Founded by brothers Ben and Toby Heap, and based in Sydney, Australia, it invests alongside entrepreneurs and other investors in early stage fintech ventures. H2 Ventures is the manager of the H2 Accelerator – Australia’s only dedicated fintech accelerator – and operates out of Sydney’s dynamic Startup Hub. Twitter @H2_Ventures LinkedIn H2 Ventures Facebook H2 Ventures KPMG Global Fintech The financial services industry is transforming with the emergence of innovative, new products, channels and business models. This wave of disruption is primarily driven by evolving customer expectations, digitalisation, as well as continued regulatory and cost pressures.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Nature of Global Trade 07
    A PERSPECTIVE ON THE DECADE AHEAD CONTENTS Executive Summary 04 Chapter Summaries 05 CHAPTER 1 THE CHANGING NATURE OF GLOBAL TRADE 07 CHAPTER 2 THE IMPACT OF DIGITALISATION 49 CHAPTER 3 BRIDGING THE GAP IN TRADE FINANCE 75 CHAPTER 4 SHAPING THE FUTURE OF SUSTAINABILITY 91 Conclusion 120 Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Sweeping advances in tech and finance will fuel global trade over next decade. According to our global Future of Trade research, technology could bridge the current $1.5 trillion. trade finance gap, unlocking new opportunities for trade across borders. Meanwhile, Blockchain is ripe for adoption – not just providing faster, more secure and effective ways to handle workflows in order to move goods across international borders - but also potentially helping reduce up to 20% of the actual physical paper costs associated with global trade, currently estimated at $1.8 trillion. The report highlights the emerging impact of digital transformation for importers and exporters, along with the ongoing shifts in global economic power. For the last 12 months, DMCC, the world’s flagship Free Zone and the Government of Dubai Authority on commodities trade and enterprise, embarked on a journey to discover what is in store for the future of trade. We gathered 250 global industry leaders, academics, and experts in six commodity trade hubs to discuss how trade will change in the next decade and how it will drive the global economy into the next phase of growth. This report is a synthesis of the insights gained from these discussions and lays out the conclusions. 4 The Future of Trade Chapter Summaries CHAPTER SUMMARIES CHAPTER 1 THE CHANGING NATURE OF GLOBAL TRADE Changes can steer or veer the Future of Trade Technological advancements and political Geopolitical factors continue to challenge developments are affecting the nature of traditional tradeflows and associated tariffs; from how goods and services are exchanged the US election, to the UK’s Brexit through to worldwide at pace.
    [Show full text]
  • Optegra AB (Publ)
    TrustBuddy International AB Company Description 2011 Disclaimer References to “the Company Description” pertain to this document containing information for investors in conjunction with the Company’s application of admission to trading on NASDAQ OMX Stockholm AB’s First North list (“First North”). The Company Description has not been registered or approved by any governmental or regulatory agency in Sweden. The Company Description has been prepared by the Board of Directors of TrustBuddy International AB (“TrustBuddy”) as information for the shareholders before the intended listing of the Company on the First North list. The shares are not subject to trade or distribution or application in any other country than Sweden. In consequence, the shares are not registered for trade or distribution in the USA, Canada or any other country than Sweden. This Company Description may not be distributed to, or within, any country in which such distribution requires any additional registrations, filings, review or other measures than those required under Swedish law. Any and all information in this Company Description shall be carefully considered, particularly the specific factors mentioned in the sector “Risk factors”. Statements in this Company Description regarding future prospects or other future conditions are made by the Company and based on current market conditions and other current factors. Such statements, as all statements regarding the future, are subject to uncertainty. This Company Description also contains information regarding market growth, market development and industry estimates, including information regarding the size of the markets on which the Company is operating. That information is based on the Company’s knowledge about its operations and markets and on information compiled by a number of external sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Lending Club Investor Testimonials
    Lending Club Investor Testimonials Extra unaspirated, Friedrick urbanize marlinspikes and staned soapberry. Bareheaded Alonzo desolated her abjuration so legally that Forster earwig very atop. Bactrian and Isiac Silvan labializes: which Fleming is pretty-pretty enough? The secondary markets sections, they are for your outcome as loan providers provide the investor club The principal rate is minute by Lending Club and is based on the applicant's credit rating Rates are very competitive when compared to traditional banks and physician as shabby as 616 APR The highest possible art is 359 APR The best APR is city to borrowers with excellent credit. Hi Peter, such record a hair salon, they also produce one real the highest fee structures in russian industry. Short-term commercial loans for real estate investors rentals rehabs flipping and wholesaling. The FTC also alleges that Lending Club falsely told loan applicants that Investors. Are will better investments for similar returns? Lending Club has multiple opportunities to address new market segments. Remove when possible borrowers based on investor lending club testimonials appearing on! As investors club seems more info is. Mike is split structure, the securities and we will not publish your dental technology and told me a few photos and! Billion in doing some cases, listen to the last five years, when they still are taken out more secure personal investor club was inspired me? This asset location, investors club is the computation of the negatives? Hear how real estate investors talk off their successful returns and relationship with us Our team without a proven track rate of hostage and.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case of Regulatory Evolution
    Forum A CASE OF REGULATORY successful integration of sector regulation, alongside continued government support for alternative finance. EVOLUTION – A REVIEW OF While many member states have opted for a “wait and THE UK FINANCIAL CONDUCT see” approach to crowdfunding regulation, the United Kingdom was of the first nations to create bespoke reg- AUTHORITY’S APPROacH TO ulation for crowdfunding activities. As the regulating CROWDFUNDING body that monitors and supervises crowdfunding ac- tivities in the UK is the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)2, this article will centre on the regulatory regime that it has adopted. ROBERT WarDROP AND 1 The FCA defines crowdfunding as an umbrella term to TANIA ZIEGLER capture various “categories” of activity, some of which are regulated whilst others are not. The general defini- Introduction tion of crowdfunding, according to the FCA is “an inter- net-based business model […] in which people and busi- Across Europe, crowdfunding is quickly moving from a nesses (including start-ups) can try to raise money from fringe funding instrument to becoming a mainstream fi- the public, to support a business, project, campaign or nance channel, connecting “crowds” to fund businesses, individual” (FCA 2016a). This broad term includes four projects and individuals. In its recently published Report sub-categories: on Crowdfunding in the EU Capital Markets Union, the European Commission details the importance of crowd- • Donation-based crowdfunding: people give funding as “an important source of non-bank financing money to enterprises or organisations whose activi- in support of job creation, economic growth and com- ties they want to support. petitiveness” (European Commission 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Marzo De 2016 REPORTE DE ESTABILIDAD FINANCIERA
    Marzo de 2016 REPORTE DE ESTABILIDAD FINANCIERA Marzo de 2016 Banco de la República Bogotá, D. C., Colombia ISSN - 1692 - 4029 2 CONTENIDO Resumen 7 I. Entorno macroeconómico 11 II. Vulnerabilidades del sistema financiero 17 A. Situación actual del sistema financiero 17 B. Riesgo de crédito 22 C. Riesgo de mercado 37 D. Riesgo de liquidez 40 Recuadro 1: Evolución del fondeo de los establecimientos de crédito, según la estabilidad de sus fuentes 46 Recuadro 2: Comparación entre el indicador de riesgo de liquidez de la Superintendencia Financiera de Colombia y el liquidity coverage ratio del comité de Basilea 51 III. Ejercicio de sensibilidad 55 Recuadro 3: Caracterización de los fondos de inversión colectiva (FIC) del sistema financiero colombiano 68 Recuadro 4: Peer to peer lending 72 IV. Regulación financiera 80 3 ÍNDICE DE GRÁFICOS Gráfico 1 A. Crecimiento económico real anual de las principales economías mundiales B. Crecimiento económico real anual para algunos países de América Latina 12 Gráfico 2 Expectativas de las tasas de los fondos federales 12 Gráfico 3 Índices de precios de los commodities 13 Gráfico 4 Curva spot Colombia 14 Gráfico 5 Déficit en la cuenta corriente 14 Gráfico 6 Crecimiento real anual de la cartera bruta de los establecimientos de crédito 18 Gráfico 7 A. Indicador de calidad por riesgo (ICR) B. Indicador de calidad por mora (ICM) 19 Gráfico 8 Tipo de inversión como proporción del total de inversiones 19 Gráfico 9 Composición del pasivo de los establecimientos de crédito 20 Gráfico 10 Composición del portafolio de inversiones de los IFNB 21 Gráfico 11 Crecimiento real anual de las comisiones y honorarios 22 Gráfico 12 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Triple-Bottom-Line Impact Analysis Framework of Fintech Companies
    STUDIES AND ARTICLES VARGA, DÁVID TRIPLE-BOTTOM-LINE IMPACT ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK OF FINTECH COMPANIES Financial institutions play a crucial role in the market economy. Banks act as intermediaries between savers and borro- wers, decreasing information asymmetry and enabling investment. They play a crucial part in society by offering financial services to people and enabling corporate investment. Traditional bricks-and-mortar banks cannot sufficiently financially include all people – they particularly fail to reach the Bottom-of-the-Pyramid (BoP). Newly emerging financial technology companies – fintechs – have already started to fill the gap by providing services to the BoP, enabled by information and communications technology (ICT) and new business models. The triple-bottom-line (TBL) impact analysis of fintechs is a new, emerging research area. This article fills the gap in current literature by providing a proposed analytical framework with which to assess fintechs from a TBL-value-creation perspective. The article presents the benefits of the TBL Impact Analysis Framework of Fintechs based on findings from more than hundred currently operating fintechs and existing sustainable banking initiatives. The framework contains the direct and indirect TBL value creation elements of fintechs organized along their economic, social and environmental impact and can be used as a simple, yet effective assessment tool for analyzing the TBL impact of fintechs, helping to make TBL-related adjustments, improving upon currently offered solutions, or aiding in the design of financial new products with TBL value-creation elements. Keywords: business models (BM), bottom of the pyramid (BoP), fintech, financial inclusion, sustainable banking, TBL impact analysis framework, triple-bottom-line (TBL) he Club of Rome published a warning almost 50 years toward their internal and external stakeholders, the peo- Tago in the Limits to Growth (1971) that economic ple and planet when striving to make an economic profit.
    [Show full text]
  • What Drives the Expansion of the Peer-To-Peer Lending?
    What drives the expansion of the peer-to-peer lending? Olena Havrylchyk1, Carlotta Mariotto2, Talal Rahim3, Marianne Verdier4 Abstract Peer-to-peer lending platforms are online intermediaries that match lenders with borrowers. We use data from the two leading online lenders, Prosper and Lending Club, to explore main drivers of their expansion in the United States. We exploit the heterogeneity in local lending markets at the county level to analyze three hypotheses for the penetration of online lenders: 1) crisis- related; 2) competition-related; and 3) Internet-related. Our findings support the competition- related hypothesis as online lenders have expanded more in areas with lower density of branch network and lower bank concentration that we interpret as weaker brand loyalty. We also document that spatial, socio-economic and demographic characteristics determine the expansion of online lenders. JEL codes: G21, G23, G01, O33, D40 Keywords: peer-to-peer lending, online lenders, market structure, brand loyalty, financial crisis, internet, information and communication technologies 1 LEM, University of Lille; CEPII and Labex ReFi, contact: [email protected] 2 CERNA, Ecole des Mines de Paris, contact: [email protected] 3 Boston University, contact: [email protected] 4 CRED, University Paris 2 Panthéon Assas, and CERNA, Ecole des Mines de Paris, contact : [email protected] Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2841316 “Banking is necessary; banks are not” Bill Gates, 1990 “Is information technology going to disrupt finance? My first response is: please. My second response is: yes.” Martin Wolf, 2016 1. Introduction First peer-to-peer (P2P) lending platforms, Zopa, Prosper and Lending Club, have been launched in 2005-2007 in the UK and the US.
    [Show full text]