DOCSLIB.ORG

Worse Things Happen at Sea: the Welfare of Wild-Caught Fish

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Worse Things Happen at Sea: the Welfare of Wild-Caught Fish [ “One of the sayings of the Holy Prophet Muhammad(s) tells us: ‘If you must kill, kill without torture’” (Animals in Islam, 2010) Worse things happen at sea: the welfare of wild-caught fish Summary Report Alison Mood fishcount.org.uk 2010 Acknowledgments Many thanks to Phil Brooke and Heather Pickett for reviewing this document. Phil also helped to devise the strategy presented in this report and wrote the final chapter. About this report This summary report is based on a more detailed and fully-referenced version of the report which is available from fishcount.org.uk. Cover photo credit: OAR/National Undersea Research Program (NURP). National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/Dept of Commerce. 1 Contents Section 1: Introduction to fish welfare in commercial fishing 3 1 Introduction 3 2 Fish are sentient beings 4 Section 2: Major fishing methods and their impact on animal welfare 8 3 Introduction to animal welfare aspects of fish capture 8 4 Trawling 9 5 Purse seining 11 6 Gill nets, tangle nets and trammel nets 13 7 Rod & line and hand line fishing 15 8 Trolling 17 9 Pole & line fishing 19 10 Long line fishing 21 11 Trapping 23 12 Harpooning 25 13 Use of live bait fish in fish capture 26 14 Summary of improving welfare during capture & landing 28 Section 3: Welfare of fish after capture 33 15 Processing of fish alive on landing 33 16 Introducing humane slaughter for wild-catch fish 34 Section 4: Reducing welfare impact by reducing numbers 35 17 How many fish are caught each year? 35 18 Reducing suffering by reducing numbers caught 37 Section 5: Towards more humane fishing 40 19 Better welfare improves fish quality 40 20 Key roles for improving welfare of wild-caught fish 41 21 Strategies for improving welfare of wild-caught fish 45 References 47 Worse things happen at sea: the welfare of wild-caught fish 2 Section 1: Introduction to fish welfare in commercial fishing 1 Introduction It is widely accepted that animals killed for food Broom of the University of Cambridge (1999a): should be slaughtered humanely. This means that they are killed in ways that cause immediate loss “at least some aspects of pain as we know it of consciousness which lasts until death (or if not must be felt by fish.” immediate, where the method of inducing unconsciousness does not cause suffering e.g. The suffering of fish in commercial fishing is food grade anaesthetics). therefore a major animal welfare issue. This report proposes measures and strategies for There is increasing concern for the welfare of reducing the suffering in fisheries. farmed fish during rearing, transport and slaughter, and in the last few years some progress has been made here. This report argues that the welfare of commercially-caught wild fish during capture and slaughter also needs to be addressed. Wild-caught fish are captured and killed in a manner entirely inconsistent with the concepts of humane treatment and slaughter, and the severity and duration of suffering are likely to be high. The capture of wild-caught fish may last for several hours or even days. Most are likely to die from being crushed in nets, from suffocation in air or from live dissection. They may be rapidly chilled as they suffocate, a process which may both increase and prolong their distress. The number of wild-catch fish is also very high compared with other species killed for food. The current author has estimated that the number of wild fish caught annually is in the order of 1 trillion i.e. 1,000 billion (see chapter 17). This compares with 3 billion mammals, 57 billion birds and, at a rough estimate, 10-100 billion farmed fish slaughtered each year. In 1980, the UK RSPCA’s Medway report concluded that fish can feel pain and fear. Since then, animal welfare science has become a field in its own right, and the evidence that fish can suffer has grown. As stated by Professor Donald fishcount.org.uk 3 Section 1: Introduction to fish welfare in commercial fishing 2 Fish are sentient beings Pain and fear in fish “Anatomical, pharmacological and behavioural data suggest that affective states of pain, fear and stress are likely to be experienced by fish in similar ways as in tetrapods [amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals]” (Chandroo et al, 2004) Credit: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/Department of Commerce. Photographer: Mr. Mohammed Al Momany, Aqaba, Jordan Professor John Webster, of the University of “There are some differences in sensory Bristol, defines sentience with (2009): functioning between fish and mammals because fish live in water but the pain system "A sentient animal is one for whom feelings of fish is very similar to that of birds and matter". mammals. Fish have pain receptor cells, nociceptive neuronal pathways, specialized Sentience is about the inner life of an animal, and transmitter substances, electrophysiological a sentient animal has capacity to suffer fear, pain responses to cuts, bruises and electric shocks, or distress as well as a sense of well-being. There behavioural avoidance, learned avoidance of is a growing body of evidence that fish are places where they had unpleasant experiences sentient. and processing systems in the brain which parallel those in birds and mammals. Hence at The learning achievements of a goldfish called least some aspects of pain as we know it must “Comet”, trained by his owner to fetch hoops like a be felt by fish.” dog and many other tricks, received great media interest in 2008. In 2003, the publication of a In the European Union, a scientific panel collection of articles on fish intelligence was commissioned by the EU commission adopted its reported on the BBC news website (BBC News, “General approach to fish welfare and to the 2003) which said that, according to scientists, fish concept of sentience in fish” in 2009 (AHAW, 2009). The AHAW Panel had been asked to “do not deserve their reputation as the dim-wits deliver a Scientific Opinion on the animal welfare of the animal kingdom”. aspects of fish farming. Having examined the research that has been carried out for some Of key importance in animal welfare is the capacity species of fish (a relatively small number of to experience pain, fear and distress. The case for species have been studied), this panel concludes: fish feeling pain is summed up by Professor Donald Broom of the University of Cambridge “The balance of the evidence indicates that (1999a): some fish species have the capacity to experience pain” Worse things happen at sea: the welfare of wild-caught fish 4 Section 1: Introduction to fish welfare in commercial fishing Fish feel pain Herring caught in the crush Credit (above left): Courtesy of United Nations Food and Agriculture “at least some aspects of pain as we know it must be Organization. Photographer: Danilo Cedrone. National Oceanic and felt by fish” (Broom, 1999a) Atmospheric Administration/Department of Commerce. Credit (above): National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/ Department of Commerce. Photographer: J. M. Olson. and that Fish have brain structures capable of feeling fear and pain “Responses of fish, of some species and AHAW (2009) discusses the similarities in brain under certain situations, suggest that they are structure between fish and other vertebrates and able to experience fear”. begins by saying that: Some scientists have argued that fish cannot “As vertebrates, fish, birds and mammals suffer. In 2002, Rose published a paper, share a similar general brain structure”. conducted at the behest of the American Fisheries Society, arguing that fish do not feel Like that of other vertebrates, the fish brain pain because they do not have a neocortex and consists of the forebrain (i.e. telencephalon and that their behaviours are reflexes without feeling. diencephalon), midbrain and hindbrain. The fish brain is not identical to the mammalian brain. It is The evidence that fish do in fact have brain smaller and fish do not have the extensive structures capable of feeling pain and fear is cerebral cortex seen in the forebrain of mammals. discussed below. The evidence that fish have a This is a laminated structure which covers the pain system which is telencephalon. It has sometimes been argued that because fish do not possess this laminated • similar to that of other vertebrates (e.g. structure (a “neocortex”), they must therefore be mammals and birds), and that incapable of experiencing pain. However, there is • involves these animals feeling pain good reason to believe that fish do experience pain and fear without this particular structure. is discussed subsequently. It is known that the same brain function can be served by different brain structures in different groups of animals, e.g. cognitive functions in birds and mammals (visual stimuli are processed by fishcount.org.uk 5 Section 1: Introduction to fish welfare in commercial fishing part of the cerebral cortex in mammals but by the animals in scientific research was amended to midbrain optic tectum in birds). Another example include the common octopus. of this is that seen in dolphins, highly intelligent animals whose brain is organized in a AHAW (2009) concludes its discussion on brain fundamentally different way to that of primates. It structure by saying: is also a matter of some debate whether human consciousness is a function of the neotcortex “There is scientific evidence to support the alone, or restricted to any single area of the brain. assumption that some fish species have brain structures potentially capable of experiencing As AHAW states, there is evidence that the fish pain and fear”. forebrain contains within it several brain structures that perform similar functions to those As Professor John Webster argues, since all or associated with pain and fear in higher nearly all the evidence points in the direction of vertebrates.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fermented and Ripened Fish Products in the Northern European Countries
    Accepted Manuscript Fermented and ripened fish products in the Northern European countries Torstein Skåra, Lars Axelsson, Gudmundur Stefánsson, Bo Ekstrand, Helge Hagen PII: S2352-6181(15)00005-0 DOI: 10.1016/j.jef.2015.02.004 Reference: JEF 12 To appear in: Journal of Ethnic Foods Received Date: 16 January 2015 Revised Date: 23 January 2015 Accepted Date: 2 February 2015 Please cite this article as: Skåra T, Axelsson L, Stefánsson G, Ekstrand B, Hagen H, Fermented and ripened fish products in the Northern European countries, Journal of Ethnic Foods (2015), doi: 10.1016/ j.jef.2015.02.004. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1 Fermented and ripened fish products in the Northern European countries 2 Torstein Skåra 1* , Lars Axelsson 2, Gudmundur Stefánsson 3, Bo Ekstrand 4 and Helge Hagen 5 3 1 Nofima - Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries, and Aquaculture Research, Postboks 8034, 4 NO-4068 Stavanger, Norway 5 2 Nofima - Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries, and Aquaculture Research, P.O.Box 210, 6 NO-1431 Ås, Norway 7 3 Matis, Vinlandsleid 12, 113 Reykjavik, Iceland 8 4 Bioconsult AB, Stora Vägen 49, SE-523 61 Gällstad, Sweden 5 MANUSCRIPT 9 Dælivegen 118, NO-2385 Brumunddal, Norway 10 *Author for correspondence: Tel: +47-51844600; Fax: +47-51844651 11 E-mail.
    [Show full text]
  • Meetings and Announcements
    3. the prohibition of painful sur­ b. inspect and report to the Board on gical procedures without the use of a the treatment of animals in commer­ properly administered anesthesia; cial farming; MEETINGS !!!!! and c. investigate all complaints and alle­ ANNOUNCEMENTS 4. provisions for a licensing system gations of unfair treatment of for all farms. Such system shall in­ animals; clude, but shall not be limited to, the d. issue in writing, without prior hear­ following requirements: ing, a cease and desist order to any i. all farms shall b'e inspected person if the Commission has reason prior to the issuance of a I icense. to believe that that person is causing, ii. farms shall thereafter be in­ engaging in, or maintaining any spected at least once a year. condition or activity which, in the iii. minimum requirements shall Director's judgment, will result in or be provided to insure a healthy is likely to result in irreversible or ir­ life for every farm animal. These reparable damage to an animal or its requirements shall include, but environment, and it appears prejudi­ not be limited to: cial to the interests of the [State] a. proper space allowances; {United States] to delay action until b. proper nutrition; an opportunity for a hearing can be c. proper care and treatment provided. The order shall direct such of animals; and person to discontinue, abate or allevi­ d. proper medical care. .ate such condition, activity, or viola­ f. The Board may enter into contract tion. A hearing shall be provided with with any person, firm, corporation or ____ days to allow the person to FORTHCOMING association to handle things neces­ show that each condition, activity or MEETINGS sary or convenient in carrying out the violation does not exist; and functions, powers and duties of the e.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishery Oceanographic Study on the Baleen Whaling Grounds
    FISHERY OCEANOGRAPHIC STUDY ON THE BALEEN WHALING GROUNDS KEIJI NASU INTRODUCTION A Fishery oceanographic study of the whaling grounds seeks to find the factors control­ ling the abundance of whales in the waters and in general has been a subject of interest to whalers. In the previous paper (Nasu 1963), the author discussed the oceanography and baleen whaling grounds in the subarctic Pacific Ocean. In this paper, the oceanographic environment of the baleen whaling grounds in the coastal region ofJapan, subarctic Pacific Ocean, and Antarctic Ocean are discussed. J apa­ nese oceanographic observations in the whaling grounds mainly have been carried on by the whaling factory ships and whale making research boats using bathyther­ mographs and reversing thermomenters. Most observations were made at surface. From the results of the biological studies on the whaling grounds by Marr ( 1956, 1962) and Nemoto (1959) the author presumed that the feeding depth is less than about 50 m. Therefore, this study was made mainly on the oceanographic environ­ ment of the surface layer of the whaling grounds. In the coastal region of Japan Uda (1953, 1954) plotted the maps of annual whaling grounds for each 10 days and analyzed the relation between the whaling grounds and the hydrographic condition based on data of the daily whaling reports during 1910-1951. A study of the subarctic Pacific Ocean whaling grounds in relation to meteorological and oceanographic conditions was made by U da and Nasu (1956) and Nasu (1957, 1960, 1963). Nemoto (1957, 1959) also had reported in detail on the subject from the point of the food of baleen whales and the ecology of plankton.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Technology Glossary
    Glossary of Fish Technology Terms A Selection of Terms Compiled by Kevin J. Whittle and Peter Howgate Prepared under contract to the Fisheries Industries Division of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 6 December 2000 Last updated: February 2002 Kevin J. Whittle 1 GLOSSARY OF FISH TECHNOLOGY TERMS [Words highlighted in bold in the text of an entry refer to another entry. Words in parenthesis are alternatives.] Abnormalities Attributes of the fish that are not found in the great majority of that kind of fish. For example: atypical shapes; overall or patchy discolorations of skin or of fillet; diseased conditions; atypical odours or flavours. Generally, the term should be used for peculiarities present in the fish at the time of capture or harvesting, or developing very soon after; peculiarities arising during processing should be considered as defects. Acetic acid Formal chemical name, ethanoic acid. An organic acid of formula CH3.COOH. It is the main component, 3-6%, other than water, of vinegar. Used in fish technology in preparation of marinades. Acid curing See Marinating Actomyosin A combination of the two main proteins, actin and myosin, present in all muscle tissues. Additive A chemical added to a food to affect its properties. Objectives of including additives in a product include: increased stability during storage; inhibition of growth of microorganisms or production of microbial toxins; prevention or reduction of formation of off-flavours; improved sensory properties, particularly colours and appearance, affecting acceptability to the consumer; improved properties related to preparation and processing of food, for example, ability to create stable foams or emulsions, or to stabilise or thicken sauces.
    [Show full text]
  • Cutting. We Started a Research Program to Investigate the Process of Curing Fish in Traditional Kilns
    THE TORRY KILN ITS DESIGN AND APPLICATION WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE COLD SMOKING OF SALMON, HERRING, AND COD Alex M cK . Bannerman, M BE A. I. F . S. T. Independent Consultant Swanland, North Ferriby Yorkshire HU14 3QT En gland 44! 0482-633124 In 1933, I was privileged to join the Torry Research Station in Aberdeen, Scotland. I worked for the director, the late Dr. G. A. Reay, investigating fish proteins, freezing, cold storage, salting, and dehydration of herring and cod, and the analytical techniques to test these processes ~ In 1936 37, I became involved in smoke curing fish, working with Dr. Charles Cutting. We started a research program to investigate the process of curing fish in traditional kilns. Some of these kiln s were 800 ft square and 30 ft high. We measured air flow, temperatures, humidities, and weight loss of fish during smoking. From the data, we built a picture of the irregularities and disadvantages of smoking in these old kilns. However, this also led to improving the process. After several attempts, we developed a simple tunnel design in which fish could be smoked under controlled conditions. The process was more economical, faster, and the product more uniform. This is a bit of history, but it was from this work that we built our expertise and knowledge of fish. A previous speaker suggested that with modern, programmable smoking equipment it is only necessary to push buttons, and "witch doctors" are no longer needed. I would agr ee with this for products such as salami, sausages, and other products manufactured from uniform ingredients in skins of uniform length and thickness ~ However, fish come in all shapes and sizes, with differing fat, protein and water content.
    [Show full text]
  • SOLUTION: Gathering and Sonic Blasts for Oil Exploration Because These Practices Can Harm and Kill Whales
    ENDANGEREDWHALES © Nolan/Greenpeace WE HAVE A PROBLEM: WHAT YOU CAN DO: • Many whale species still face extinction. • Tell the Bush administration to strongly support whale protection so whaling countries get the • Blue whales, the largest animals ever, may now number as message. few as 400.1 • Ask elected officials to press Iceland, Japan • Rogue nations Japan, Norway and Iceland flout the and Norway to respect the commercial whaling international ban on commercial whaling. moratorium. • Other threats facing whales include global warming, toxic • Demand that the U.S. curb global warming pollution dumping, noise pollution and lethal “bycatch” from fishing. and sign the Stockholm Convention, which bans the most harmful chemicals on the planet. • Tell Congress that you oppose sonar intelligence SOLUTION: gathering and sonic blasts for oil exploration because these practices can harm and kill whales. • Japan, Norway and Iceland must join the rest of the world and respect the moratorium on commercial whaling. • The loophole Japan exploits to carry out whaling for “Tomostpeople,whalingisallnineteenth- “scientific” research should be closed. centurystuff.Theyhavenoideaabout • Fishing operations causing large numbers of whale hugefloatingslaughterhouses,steel-hulled bycatch deaths must be cleaned up or stopped. chaserboatswithsonartostalkwhales, • Concerted international action must be taken to stop andharpoonsfiredfromcannons.” other threats to whales including global warming, noise Bob Hunter, pollution, ship strikes and toxic contamination.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Effects of Fishing and Whaling in the North Pacific And
    TWENTY-SIX Ecosystem Effects of Fishing and Whaling in the North Pacific and Atlantic Oceans BORIS WORM, HEIKE K. LOTZE, RANSOM A. MYERS Human alterations of marine ecosystems have occurred about the role of whales in the food web and (2) what has throughout history, but only over the last century have these been observed in other species playing a similar role. Then we reached global proportions. Three major types of changes may explore whether the available evidence supports these have been described: (1) the changing of nutrient cycles and hypotheses. Experiments and detailed observations in lakes, climate, which may affect ecosystem structure from the bot- streams, and coastal and shelf ecosystems have shown that tom up, (2) fishing, which may affect ecosystems from the the removal of large predatory fishes or marine mammals top down, and (3) habitat alteration and pollution, which almost always causes release of prey populations, which often affect all trophic levels and therefore were recently termed set off ecological chain reactions such as trophic cascades side-in impacts (Lotze and Milewski 2004). Although the (Estes and Duggins 1995; Micheli 1999; Pace et al. 1999; large-scale consequences of these changes for marine food Shurin et al. 2002; Worm and Myers 2003). Another impor- webs and ecosystems are only beginning to be understood tant interaction is competitive release, in which formerly (Pauly et al. 1998; Micheli 1999; Jackson et al. 2001; suppressed species replace formerly dominant ones that were Beaugrand et al. 2002; Worm et al. 2002; Worm and Myers reduced by fishing (Fogarty and Murawski 1998; Myers and 2003; Lotze and Milewski 2004), the implications for man- Worm 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • American Perceptions of Marine Mammals and Their Management, by Stephen R
    American Perceptions of Marine Mammals and Their Management Stephen R. Kellert Yale University School of Forestry and Environmental Studies May 1999 CHAPTER ONE: Introduction and Research Methodology Most Americans associate marine mammals with two orders of animals-the ceteceans, including the whales and dolphins, and the pinnipeds, consisting of the seals, sea lions, and walrus. The more informed recognize another marine mammal order, the sirenians, represented in the United States by one species, the manatee, mainly found along the Florida peninsula. Less widely recognized as marine mammals, but still officially classified as marine mammals, include one ursine species, the polar bear, and a mustelid, the sea otter. This report will examine American views of all marine mammals and their management, although mostly focusing on, for reasons of greater significance and familiarity, the cetaceans and pinnipeds. Marine mammals are among the most privileged yet beleaguered of creatures in America today. Many marine mammals enjoy unusually strong public interest and support, their popularity having expanded enormously during the past half-century. Marine mammals are also relatively unique among wildlife in America in having been the recipients of legislation dedicated exclusively to their protection, management, and conservation. This law - the Marine Mammal Protection Act - is one of the most ambitious, comprehensive, and progressive environmental laws ever enacted. More problematically, various marine mammal species have been the source of considerable policy conflict and management controversy, both domestically and internationally, and an associated array of challenges to their well-being and, in some cases, future survival. Over-exploitation (e.g., commercial whaling) was the most prominent cause of marine mammal decline historically, although this threat has greatly diminished.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Bycatch' Whaling a Growing Threat to Coastal Whales 23 June 2009
    'Bycatch' whaling a growing threat to coastal whales 23 June 2009 Scientists are warning that a new form of Whales are occasionally killed in entanglements unregulated whaling has emerged along the with fishing nets and the deaths of large whales are coastlines of Japan and South Korea, where the reported by most member nations of the IWC. commercial sale of whales killed as fisheries Japan and South Korea are the only countries that "bycatch" is threatening coastal stocks of minke allow the commercial sale of products killed as whales and other protected species. "incidental bycatch." The sheer number of whales represented by whale-meat products on the market Scott Baker, associate director of the Marine suggests that both countries have an inordinate Mammal Institute at Oregon State University, says amount of bycatch, Baker said. DNA analysis of whale-meat products sold in Japanese markets suggests that the number of "The sale of bycatch alone supports a lucrative whales actually killed through this "bycatch trade in whale meat at markets in some Korean whaling" may be equal to that killed through coastal cities, where the wholesale price of an adult Japan's scientific whaling program - about 150 minke whale can reach as high as $100,000," annually from each source. Baker said. "Given these financial incentives, you have to wonder how many of these whales are, in Baker, a cetacean expert, and Vimoksalehi fact, killed intentionally." Lukoscheck of the University of California-Irvine presented their findings at the recent scientific In Japan, whale-meat products enter into the meeting of the International Whaling Commission commercial supply chain that supports the (IWC) in Portugal.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethics of Human-Chicken Relationships in Video Games: the Origins of the Digital Chicken B
    The ethics of human-chicken relationships in video games: the origins of the digital chicken B. Tyr Fothergill Catherine Flick School of Archaeology and Ancient De Montfort University History The Gateway University of Leicester, Leicester Leicester, United Kingdom LE1 7RH, United Kingdom LE1 9BH, United Kingdom +44 0116 223 1014 +44 116 207 8487 [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT depicted being. In this paper, we explore the many and varied In this paper, we look at the historical place that chickens have roles and uses of the chicken in video games and contextualize held in media depictions and as entertainment, analyse several these with archaeological and historical data. types of representations of chickens in video games, and draw out 2. THE DOMESTICATION AND SPREAD reflections on society in the light of these representations. We also look at real-life, modern historical, and archaeological evidence of OF Gallus gallus, THE CHICKEN chicken treatment and the evolution of social attitudes with regard Humans have conceptually and physically shaped and re-shaped to animal rights, and deconstruct the depiction of chickens in the other animal species with which we have interacted; few video games in this light. examples of this are more striking than the chicken. Domestication is often conceived of as an activity undertaken by Categories and Subject Descriptors humans which converts a wild plant or animal into something K.4.0 General else, a living thing entirely under the control of or dependent upon humans to survive. The complexities of such a transformation are General Terms immense, and are more accurately framed as “an ongoing co- Human Factors, Theory evolutionary process rather than an event or invention” [15].
    [Show full text]
  • Eating the Ocean
    Eating the Ocean ELSPETH PROBYN Duke UniversityPress Durham and London 2016 © 2016 Duke University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper oo Cover design by Heather Hensley; interior design by Courtney Leigh Baker Typeset in Whitman by Graphic Composition, Inc., Bogart, Georgia Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Probyn, Elspeth, [date] author. Title: Eating the ocean I Elspeth Probyn. Description: Durham : Duke University Press, 2016. I Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2016018768 (print) LCCN 2016019478 (ebook) ISBN 9780822362135 (hardcover : alk. paper) ISBN 9780822362357 (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN 9780822373797 (e-book) Subjects: LCSH: Food habits-Environmental aspects. I Sustainable fisheries.! Seafood-Environmental aspects. I Seafood industry-Environmental aspects. I Feminist theory. Classification: LCC GT2850.P76 2016 (print) I LCC GT2850 (ebook) I DDC 333.95/616-dc23 LC record available at https: //lccn.loc.gov/ 2016018768 Cover art: Giant bluefin tuna.Photo by JeffRotman I Alamy. CONTENTS Acknowledgments vii Introduction RELATING FISH AND HUMANS 1 An Oceanic Habitus 23 2 Following Oysters, Relating Taste 49 3 Swimming with Tuna 77 4 Mermaids, Fishwives, and Herring Quines GENDERING THE MORE-THAN-HUMAN 101 5 Little Fish EATING WITH THE OCEAN 129 Conclusion REELING IT IN 159 Notes 165 References 169 Index 183 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The genesis and the development of this book came frommany travels and conversations, and I thank all those who shared their knowledge, stories, and love of fishand oceans with me. This project allowed me to discover an immensely complex and generous world. I discovered bluefintuna and the idea of researching human-fish communities while I was at the University of South Australia, and I thank the former vice chancellor, Peter H0j, for generously funding me, and the great gang at the Hawke Research Insti­ tute (Lyn Browning, Gilbert Caluya, Maureen Cotton, Sonia Saitov, Lisa Slater, and Shvetal Yvas).
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the ICES-FAO Working Group on Fishing Technology and Fish Behaviour (WGFTFB)
    ICES WGFTFB REPORT 2010 SCICOM STEERING GROUP ON ECOSYSTEM SURVEYS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ICES CM 2010/SSGESST:14 REF. SCICOM, ACOM Report of the ICES-FAO Working Group on Fishing Technology and Fish Behaviour (WGFTFB) 31 May - 4 June 2010 ICES Headquarters, Copenhagen International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H. C. Andersens Boulevard 44–46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] Recommended format for purposes of citation: ICES. 2010. Report of the ICES-FAO Working Group on Fishing Technology and Fish Behaviour (WGFTFB), 31 May - 4 June 2010, ICES Headquarters, Copenhagen. ICES CM 2010/SSGESST :14. 252 pp. For permission to reproduce material from this publication, please apply to the Gen- eral Secretary. The document is a report of an Expert Group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. © 2010 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea ICES WGFTFB REPORT 2010 | i Contents Executive summary ................................................................................................................ 1 1 Directive .......................................................................................................................... 6 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 6 3 Terms of Reference .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]