DOCSLIB.ORG

Beginning Reading: Influences on Policy in the United

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Beginning Reading: Influences on Policy in the United BEGINNING READING: INFLUENCES ON POLICY IN THE UNITED STATES AND ENGLAND 1998-2010 A Dissertation Submitted to the College of Education of Aurora University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Education by Elizabeth Robins April 2010 Beginning Reading: Influences on Policy in the United States and England 1998-2010 by Elizabeth Robins [email protected] Committee members: Ronald Banaszak, Chair Carla Brown, Member Deborah Brotcke, Member Abstract The study investigated the divergence in beginning reading methods between the United States (US) and England from 1998 to 2010. Researchers, policy makers, and publishers were interviewed to explore their knowledge and perceptions concerning how literacy policy was determined. The first three of twelve findings showed that despite the challenges inherent in the political sphere, both governments were driven by low literacy rates to seek greater involvement in literacy education. The intervention was determined by its structure: a central parliamentary system in England, and a federal system of state rights in the US. Three further research-related findings revealed the uneasy relationship existing between policy makers and researchers. Political expediency, the speed of decision making and ideology i also helped shape literacy policy. Secondly, research is viewed differently in each nation. Peer- reviewed, scientifically-based research supporting systematic phonics prevailed in the US, whereas in England additional and more eclectic sources were also included. Thirdly, research showed that educator training in beginning reading was more pervasive and effective in England than the US. English stakeholders proved more knowledgeable about research in the US, whereas little is known about the synthetic phonics approach currently used in England. Two of the findings considered the differing role of mainstream or niche publishers. Though both are commercially based and politically engaged, the former are more business- oriented, while the latter support their chosen pedagogy. Finally it was found brain research was either supported or rejected, depending on the stakeholders’ personal beliefs concerning beginning reading pedagogy. The future livelihood and well-being of all children depends on reading ability. It is recommended that further research in reading be jointly undertaken by researchers in the US and England. The resulting shared knowledge and data would provide an improved basis for educator training, classroom pedagogy and literacy policy. Educators, researchers and their governments would then be better positioned to achieve their common goal of universal literacy. ii Acknowledgements This dissertation would not have been possible without the encouragement and knowledgeable support of many. I offer special thanks to my chair, Dr. Ronald Banaszak, for his informed and patient support, as he worked alongside me over the years during the twists and turns of my doctoral quest. I am also appreciative for the help provided by my methodologist, Dr. Carla Brown, as I determined that final emphasis, and who painstakingly guided me as I prepared for the critical interviewing stage. In addition, I am indebted to the Professors in Reading, Dr. Roberta Linder and Dr. Deborah Brockte, who, aware of the passion I brought to this task, perceptively commented on the manuscript during its many stages. Your input was timely and valuable. Of course this work could not have been accomplished without the generous contribution of my anonymous interviewees. With many calls upon their limited time, they graciously shared their knowledge and views of the field of beginning reading and its recent history. The breadth and depth of their expertise was evident as they shared information crucial to this study. Thank you. A passionate interest in beginning reading drove me on, but the daily pragmatic and empathetic support that enabled this research to go forward and come to fruition needs to be gratefully acknowledged. Thank you, dear Graham, for being my rock, constant reader and resident technology wizard. Also, throughout the doctoral process, I have been deeply sustained by the kind and interested support of my children, Zoë, Max and Jonna, and my forbearing friends. All have variously listened to me, cheered me on or even read and helpfully commented on parts of the manuscript, as I worked to complete this opus. Thank you, all. iii Table of Contents Chapter One - Introduction Recent Educational Policy in England and the US 1 Problem Statement 2 Balanced Reading and the US 3 Synthetic Phonics and the UK 3 Purpose of the Study 4 Researcher Background 5 Definitions of Terms Used 6 Conclusion 10 Chapter Two –Review of the Literature Historical Perspective 11 Alphabetic Approach 11 The Word Approach 12 The Need for Phonics 15 The Synthetic Phonics Pedagogy 16 The Whole Language Approach 17 The Emergence of Literacy Research 19 Renewal of Government Involvement in Literacy 21 A Need for Reform in the US 21 Balanced Reading 22 A Need for Reform in England 22 The US Response 23 iv The National Reading Panel 23 The English Response 26 The Rose Report 27 Nationwide Adoption of Synthetic Phonics 30 Clackmannanshire Study 32 The Role of Publishers 35 US Publishers 37 Publishers in England 38 Government Policy Decisions 40 Education Policy in the US 41 Reading First 43 Reading Recovery 43 Reading First Issues 45 Using Research to Create Policy 47 Policy Needs 47 Peer Review 48 Policy Usage in England 49 Policy Usage in the US 50 Conclusion 52 Chapter Three - Methodology Research Rationale 53 Researcher Bias 54 Qualitative Research Plan 56 v Interviewees 60 Ethical Issues and Confidentiality 61 Data Collection 63 Data Analysis 64 Data Organization Matrix 66 Study Limitations 66 Study Delimitations 67 Conclusion 68 Chapter Four - Findings Research Design 69 Participants 70 Coding of Interviews 71 Policy Maker Interviews 72 Researcher Interviews 74 Publisher Interviews 75 The Role of Government 76 Literacy Policy in England 77 The National Curriculum 78 The National Literacy Strategy 79 The New Literacy Initiative 84 Influential Rose Report 81 A National Mandate 83 Assessment and Literacy Targets 85 vi Reading Recovery Intervention 86 Literacy Targets 88 Looming Political Change 89 Literacy Policy in the US 89 Historical Underpinnings 90 New Literacy Initiative: Reading First 92 The Demise of Reading First 98 Continuing Literacy Support 101 US and English Researchers and Phonics 105 The Relationship Between Research and Policy 108 In England 108 The National Literacy Strategy 108 The Influence of Lobbying 110 The Rose Report 112 Reactions to the Rose Report 112 The Adoption of Synthetic Phonics 114 In the US 117 The Influence of Whole Language 118 Professional Development Need 120 The National Reading Panel 121 One Policy Maker’s View 121 One Researcher’s View 125 National Reading Panel – The Place of Evidence-Based Research 127 vii The Potential Marginalization of Stakeholders 130 The Links Between Research, Policy and Practitioners 132 Summary of Policy and Research 133 Stakeholders Personally-Held Views 134 Lessons From Brain Research 134 The Role of Publishing Companies 136 Publishing in England 137 Business Opportunities 137 Publishing and Business Imperatives 140 The Effect of Government Control 141 Political Change on the Horizon 144 Publishing in the US 145 Publishing Parameters 146 Publishing as a Commercial Enterprise 147 Researchers and Publishing 149 Niche Publishers 150 Publishers Links with Policy 154 Summary 155 Research Questions Revisited 157 Chapter Five - Discussion Finding One: Governments Seek to Improve Literacy 161 Finding Two: Literacy Policy is Affected by Government Structure 161 Finding Three: Political Restraints Affect Literacy Policy 162 viii 3A. Public Spotlight 163 3B. Confluence of Events 164 3C. Lobbying 165 3D. The Pace of Policy 166 3E. Money as a Motivator 168 Finding Four: Policy and Research, an Uneasy Alliance 169 Finding Five: The Use of Research Differs in England versus the US 170 Finding Six: Educator Knowledge of Research and Pedagogy Differs 172 Finding Seven: Mainstream and Niche Publishers Behave Differently 174 Finding Eight: Publishing Affected by Drives of Commerce 175 Finding Nine – English and US Policy Makers Accord 176 Finding Ten – England is More Aware of American Research than Vice-Versa 178 Finding Eleven: Beliefs and Assumptions Affect How Reading is Taught 178 Finding Twelve: Brain Research, a Young Science 179 Recommendations 180 1: Comparative Study Within the US 181 2: An International Cooperative Study 182 3: A Qualitative Study of the Grassroots Spread of Synthetic Phonics 183 4. Need for Professional Development in the US 183 5. Greater Sharing of Information Between the Two Nations 184 Limitations of the Study 184 Study Delimitations 185 Conclusion 186 ix References 188 Appendices Appendix 1: Informed Consent 204 Appendix 2: Table of Interviewee Views 206 x Chapter One: Introduction What is the best way to teach a young child to read? No two people, it seems, agree on an answer. (Chall, 1967, p. 1) Presciently, Jeanne Chall’s statement also applies to how the two nations of the United States (US) and England currently differ in their approach to teaching reading to their youngest school entrants. In the UK, following a government mandate in September 2007, the schools in England were given strong guidance regarding the use of high quality synthetic phonics programs with their beginner readers. In the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Old School -...The Professional Journal for Management & Staff
    September 2015 Chair Head Bursar Registrar Staffroom School Office ...the professional journal for Management & Staff Our front page pictures In this issue... TV’s School Swap Documentary 05 ~ Warminster head Mark Mortimer gives his verdict Independent Education ‘Remains a Family Priority’ 08 ~ despite fee increases ‘We’re Not Stopping Homework!’ 09 ~ head reveals truth behind incorrect headlines Examination Results 2015 12 ~ 15 Making waves as national ~ complete round~up rowing champions At the summer’s National Schools Regatta in Parental Expectations 20 ~ 21 Nottinghamshire, two pupils from Merchant ~ which seem reasonable, which do not Taylors’ Girls’ School, Merseyside, were crowned rowing champions of England. Pushy Parents 22 Georgia Shirley and Sophie Gillbanks represented ~ & exam anxieties Merchant Taylors’ Boat Club in the Women’s Junior 14 category. The pair faced tough Flexi-boarding 24 opposition from over 30 other clubs including ~ the new dimension those from Eton Excelsior RC, City of Oxford RC, Ross Schools and Boston RC. Profile 32 ~ 33 The regatta was split into three heats; the time ~ in conversation with David Elstone trial, the semi-final and the final. The girls were fastest in all three, winning the final race Community Outreach Projects 36 ~ 38 comfortably by a margin of four seconds. ~ examples of best practice This success follows another runaway win in Encouraging Responsible Independence 39 April when the pair represented the North West of England in the Inter-Regional Regatta, again ~ through risk-taking finishing first in the country with an astounding 17 second lead. Despite the duo only pairing up as a team last Plus October, Sophie and Georgia have already made Chris Woodhead tributes 04 Merchant Taylors’ Boat Club history as the first Young Enterprise success stories 04 & 44 female team to become national champions.
    [Show full text]
  • Janet and John: Here We Go Free Download
    JANET AND JOHN: HERE WE GO FREE DOWNLOAD Mabel O'Donnell,Rona Munro | 40 pages | 03 Sep 2007 | Summersdale Publishers | 9781840246131 | English | Chichester, United Kingdom Janet and John Series Toral Taank rated it it was amazing Nov 29, All of our paper waste is recycled and turned into corrugated cardboard. Doesn't post to Germany See details. Visit my eBay shop. Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file. Shelves: beginner-readersfemale-author-or- illustrator. Hardcover40 pages. Reminiscing Read these as a child, Janet and John: Here We Go use with my Grandbabies X Previous image. Books by Mabel O'Donnell. No doubt, Janet and John: Here We Go critics will carp at the daringly minimalist plot and character de In a recent threadsome people stated their objections to literature which fails in its duty to be gender-balanced. Please enter a number less than or equal to Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Watch this item Unwatch. Novels portal Children's literature portal. Janet and John: Here We Go O'Donnell and Rona Munro. Ronne Randall. Learning to read. Inas part of a trend in publishing nostalgic facsimiles of old favourites, Summersdale Publishers reissued two of the original Janet and John books, Here We Go and Off to Play. Analytical phonics Basal reader Guided reading Independent reading Literature circle Phonics Reciprocal teaching Structured word inquiry Synthetic phonics Whole language. We offer great value books on a wide range of subjects and we have grown steadily to become one of the UK's leading retailers of second-hand books.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    1 Introduction Phonics instruction has long been a controversial matter. Emans (1968) points out that the emphasis on phonics instruction has changed several times over the past two centuries. Instruction has shifted from one extreme—no phonics instruction— to the other—phonics instruction as the major method of word-recognition instruction—and back again. Emans also points out that “each time that phonics has been returned to the classroom, it usually has been revised into something quite different from what it was when it was discarded” (p. 607 ). Currently, most beginning reading programs include a significant component of phonics instruc- tion. This is especially true since the implementation of policies related to the No Child Left Behind Act and recommendations by the National Reading Panel (2000) for the use of both instruction and assessments related to explicit pho- nics instruction. It is also likely that the U.S. Department of Education’s initiative Race to the Top, funded as part of the Education Recovery Act of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (AARA), will continue to view phonics instruction as an integral component and focus of reading instruction. Phonics, however, is not the cure-all for reading ills that some believe it to be. Rudolph Flesch’s book Why Johnny Can’t Read (1955), although it did bring the phonics debate to the attention of the public, typifies the kind of literature that takes a naive approach to a complex problem. As Heilman (1981) points out, “Flesch’s suggestions for teaching were quite primitive, consisting pri- marily of lists of words each presenting different letter-sound patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • The End of Illiteracy?
    The End of Illiteracy? The Holy Grail of Clackmannanshire TOM BURKARD CENTRE FOR POLICY STUDIES 57 Tufton Street London SW1P 3QL 1999 THE AUTHOR Tom Burkard is the Secretary of the Promethean Trust and has published several articles on how children learn to read. He contributed to the 1997 Daily Telegraph Schools Guide, and is a member of the NASUWT. His main academic interest is the interface between reading theory and classroom practice. His own remedial programme, recently featured in the Dyslexia Review, achieved outstanding results at Costessey High School in Norwich. His last Centre for Policy Study pamphlet, Reading Fever: Why phonics must come first (written with Martin Turner in 1996) proved instrumental in determining important issues in the National Curriculum for teacher training colleges. Acknowledgements Support towards research for this Study was given by the Institute for Policy Research. The Centre for Policy Studies never expresses a corporate view in any of its publications. Contributions are chosen for their independence of thought and cogency of argument. ISBN No. 1 897969 87 2 Centre for Policy Studies, March 1999 Printed by The Chameleon Press, 5 - 25 Burr Road, London SW18 CONTENTS Summary 1. Introduction 1 2. A brief history of the ‘reading wars’ 4 3. A comparison of analytic and synthetic phonics 9 4. Problems with the National Literacy Strategy 12 5. The success of synthetic phonics 17 6. Introducing synthetic phonics into the classroom 20 7. Recommendations 22 Appendix A: Problems with SATs 25 Appendix B: A summary of recent research on analytic phonics 27 Appendix C: Research on the effectiveness of synthetic phonics 32 SUMMARY The Government’s recognition of the gravity of the problem of illiteracy in Britain is welcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Issues in Phonics Instruction. Hempenstall, K
    Some Issues in Phonics Instruction. Hempenstall, K. (No date). Some issues in phonics instruction. Education News 26/2/2001. [On-line]. Available: http://www.educationnews.org/some_issues_in_phonics_instructi.htm There are essentially two approaches to teaching phonics that influence what is taught: implicit and explicit phonics instruction. What is the difference? In an explicit (synthetic) program, students will learn the associations between the letters and their sounds. This may comprise showing students the graphemes and teaching them the sounds that correspond to them, as in “This letter you are looking at makes the sound sssss”. Alternatively, some teachers prefer teaching students single sounds first, and then later introducing the visual cue (the grapheme) for the sound, as in “You know the mmmm sound we’ve been practising, well here’s the letter used in writing that tells us to make that sound”. In an explicit program, the processes of blending (What word do these sounds make when we put them together mmm-aaa-nnn?”), and segmenting (“Sound out this word for me”) are also taught. It is of little value knowing what are the building blocks of our language’s structure if one does not know how to put those blocks together appropriately to allow written communication, or to separate them to enable decoding of a letter grouping. After letter-sound correspondence has been taught, phonograms (such as: er, ir, ur, wor, ear, sh, ee, th) are introduced, and more complex words can be introduced into reading activities. In conjunction with this approach "controlled vocabulary" stories may be used - books using only words decodable using the students' current knowledge base.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading in the Twentieth Century. INSTITUTION Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement, Ann Arbor, MI
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 479 530 CS 512 338 AUTHOR Pearson, P. David TITLE Reading in the Twentieth Century. INSTITUTION Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement, Ann Arbor, MI. SPONS AGENCY Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED), Washington, DC. PUB DATE 2000-08-00 NOTE 46p.; CIERA Archive #01-08. CONTRACT R305R70004 AVAILABLE FROM CIERA/University of Michigan, 610 E. University Ave., 1600 SEB, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1259. Tel: 734-647-6940; Fax: 734- 763 -1229. For full text: http://www.ciera.org/library/archive/ 2001-08/0108pdp.pdf. PUB TYPE Information Analyses (070). Reports Research (143) EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Educational History; *Educational Practices; Futures (of Society); Instructional Materials; *Reading Instruction; *Reading Processes; *Reading Research; Reading Skills; Teaching Methods IDENTIFIERS *Reading Theories ABSTRACT This paper discusses reading instruction in the 20th century. The paper begins with a tour of the historical pathways that have led people, at the century's end, to the "rocky and highly contested terrain educators currently occupy in reading pedagogy." After the author/educator unfolds his version of a map of that terrain in the paper, he speculates about pedagogical journeys that lie ahead in a new century and a new millennium. Although the focus is reading pedagogy, the paper seeks to connect the pedagogy to the broader scholarly ideas of each period. According to the paper, developments in reading pedagogy over the last century suggest that it is most useful to divide the century into thirds, roughly 1900-1935, 1935- 1970, and 1970-2000. The paper states that, as a guide in constructing a map of past and present, a legend is needed, a common set of criteria for examining ideas and practices in each period--several candidates suggest themselves, such as the dominant materials used by teachers in each period and the dominant pedagogical practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Head Teachers Take to the Streets School Leaders’ Cuts March
    Academisation Party conferences Disabled teachers’ conference Music for Youth Challenging racism Membership changes Middlesbrough runs the world History of the NUT A class act Mexican elections THE TEACHER November/December 2018 Head teachers take to the streets School leaders’ cuts march Your magazine from the National Education Union: NUT section 1 Join our fundraising adventure. You’ll learn about different types of diabetes and how to live a healthy lifestyle. And use your creativity to find fundraising treasure. All with Diabetes UK as your guide. 1 in 15 people have diabetes in the UK. It’s complicated, confusing and can be life threatening. We’re here to help children and adults live healthy lives with diabetes. With your help, one day, we will find a cure. You and your class can join the adventure by ordering your school fundraising pack. www.diabetes.org.uk/join-the-adventure The British Diabetic Association operating as Diabetes UK, a charity registered in England and Wales (no. 215199) and in Scotland (no. SC039136). A company limited by guarantee registered in England and Wales with no. 00339181 and registered office at Wells Lawrence House, 126 Back Church Lane London E1 1FH 1096C The Teacher November/December 2018 Welcome Hundreds of head teachers marched on Downing Street in protest at cuts to school funding. Photo: Jess Hurd, Report Digital Academisation Party conferences Disabled teachers’ conference Music for Youth Challenging racism A SHOW of contempt. That was how campaigner and head teacher Membership changes Middlesbrough runs the world History of the NUT A class act Mexican elections THE TEACHER Jules White described the Chancellor’s budget announcement on November/December 2018 education funding.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Teaching Phonics and Phonemic Awareness Training To
    The Effect of Teaching Phonics and Phonemic Awareness Training to Adolescent Struggling Readers by Stephanie Hardesty Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Education December 2013 Goucher College Graduate Programs in Education Table of Contents List of Tables i Abstract ii I. Introduction 1 Statement of the Problem 2 Hypothesis 3 Operational Definitions 3 II. Literature Review 6 Phonemic Awareness Training and Phonics 6 Reading Instruction in the High School Setting 7 Reading Remediation 10 Summary 13 III. Methods 14 Participants 14 Instrument 15 Procedure 16 IV. Results 19 V. Discussion 20 Implications 20 Threats to Validity 21 Comparison to Previous Studies 22 Suggestions for Future Research 24 References 25 List of Tables 1. Pre- and Post-SRI Test Results 19 i Abstract The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of teaching phonics and phonemic awareness training to adolescent struggling readers. The measurement tool was the Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI). This study involved the use of a pretest/posttest design to compare data prior to the implementation of the reading intervention, System 44, to data after the intervention was complete (one to two years). Achievement gains were not significant, though results could be attributable to a number of intervening factors. Research in the area of high school reading remediation should continue given the continued disagreement over best practices and the new standards that must be met per the Common Core. ii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Advanced or proficient reading abilities are one of the primary yet essential skills that should be mastered by every student.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dissertation Entitled the Effects of an Orton-Gillingham-Based
    A Dissertation entitled The Effects of an Orton-Gillingham-based Reading Intervention on Students with Emotional/Behavior Disorders by James Breckinridge Davis, M.Ed. Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Special Education. Richard Welsch, Ph.D., Committee Chair Laurie Dinnebeil, Ph.D., Committee Member Edward Cancio, Ph.D., Committee Member Lynne Hamer, Ph.D., Committee Member Dr. Patricia R. Komuniecki, Ph.D., Dean College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo December 2011 Copyright. 2011, James Breckinridge Davis This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no parts of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. An Abstract of The Effects of an Orton-Gillingham-based Reading Intervention on Students with Emotional/Behavior Disorders by James Breckinridge Davis, M.Ed. Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Special Education. The University of Toledo December 2011 This study was performed with 4 male students enrolled in a specialized public school for students with emotional/behavior disorders (E/BD). All of the students participated in a 16-week, one-to-one, multisensory reading intervention. The study was a single subject, multiple baseline design. The independent variable was an Orton- Gillingham-based reading intervention for 45 minute sessions. The dependent variable was the students‘ performance on daily probes of words read correctly and the use of pre- and post-test measures on the Dynamic Indicator of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS). The intervention consisted of 6 different parts: (a) visual, (b) auditory, (c) blending, (d) introduction of a new skill, (e) oral reading, and (f) 10-point probe.
    [Show full text]
  • TRIANGLE to Mixed-Ability Grouping - a Case Study PHILIP SAWYERS Learning a Musical Instrument: Who Has a Choice?
    ISSN 0963-8253 Volume 41 SHEILA DAINTON Think Again, Mr Blunkett Number 2 DEREK GILLARD Kings'Manor School: Summer 1999 an experiment in privatisation? COLIN RICHARDS Standards, Progress and Improvement: towards an appraisal of the OFSTED Inspection system DAVID HALPIN Socialising the Third Way': the contribution of Anthony Giddens and the significance of his analysis for education CLYDE CHITTY AND RICHARD PRING What Future for the National Curriculum in the Next Millennium? PAUL FRANCIS Beyond the Woodhead Myth MIKE OLLERTON The Irresistible Rise of the UK National Curriculum: the phoenix rising from the ashes of the Berlin Wall SUZANNE JESSEL High Parental Demand and Academic Performance in a Separate School: some possible contributory factors CHRIS SEARLE, DAVID CLINCH AND COLIN PRESCOD BLAIR PEACH LIVES! A Conference on Antiracist Education Reports and commentary NAIMA BROWNE Don't Bite the Bullet in the Early Years! FRANC KAMINSKI Semi-independent Learning: an approach TRIANGLE to mixed-ability grouping - a case study PHILIP SAWYERS Learning a Musical Instrument: who has a choice? BRYAN CUNNINGHAM Improving Schools, Improving Colleges Contents EDITORS CLYDE CHITTY, Goldsmiths College, University of London (also Book Reviews Editor) VOLUME 41 NUMBER 2 1999 ANNABELLE DIXON, Lucy Cavendish College, University of Cambridge Editorial. Has Anything Changed? 41 SHEILA DAINTON. Think Again, Mr Blunkett 43 DEREK GILLARD. Kings' Manor School: an experiment in privatisation? 47 EDITORIAL BOARD COLIN RICHARDS. Standards, Progress and MICHAEL ARMSTRONG, Harwell County Primary Improvement: towards an appraisal of the School, Oxfordshire (Chairperson) OFSTED Inspection system 51 MARY JANE DRUMMOND, School of Education, DAVID HALPIN. Socialising the 'Third Way': the University of Cambridge contribution of Anthony Giddens and the LEE ENRIGHT, Westhaven Junior School, Weymouth, significance of his analysis for education 53 Dorset CLYDE CHITTY and RICHARD PRING.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching Children to Read
    House of Commons Education and Skills Committee Teaching Children to Read Eighth Report of Session 2004–05 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 21 March 2005 HC 121 Incorporating HC 1269–i from Session 2003-04 Published on 7 April 2005 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £22.00 The Education and Skills Committee The Education and Skills Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Department for Education and Skills and its associated public bodies. Current membership Mr Barry Sheerman MP (Labour, Huddersfield) (Chairman) Mr David Chaytor MP (Labour, Bury North) Valerie Davey MP (Labour, Bristol West) Jeff Ennis MP (Labour, Barnsley East & Mexborough) Mr Nick Gibb MP (Conservative, Bognor Regis & Littlehampton) Mr John Greenway MP (Conservative, Ryedale) Paul Holmes MP (Liberal Democrat, Chesterfield) Helen Jones MP (Labour, Warrington North) Mr Kerry Pollard MP (Labour, St Albans) Jonathan Shaw MP (Labour, Chatham and Aylesford) Mr Andrew Turner MP (Conservative, Isle of Wight) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at: www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/education_and_skills_committee.cfm Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are David Lloyd (Clerk), Dr Sue Griffiths (Second Clerk), Libby Aston (Committee Specialist), Nerys Roberts (Committee Specialist), Lisa Wrobel (Committee Assistant), Susan Monaghan (Committee Assistant), Catherine Jackson (Secretary) and John Kittle (Senior Office Clerk).
    [Show full text]
  • The Role and Performance of Ofsted
    House of Commons Education Committee The role and performance of Ofsted Second Report of Session 2010–11 Volume III Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published 23 March 2011 Published on 17 April 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited The Education Committee The Education Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Department for Education and its associated public bodies. Membership at time Report agreed: Mr Graham Stuart MP (Conservative, Beverley & Holderness) (Chair) Neil Carmichael MP (Conservative, Stroud) Nic Dakin MP (Labour, Scunthorpe) Bill Esterson MP, (Labour, Sefton Central) Pat Glass MP (Labour, North West Durham) Damian Hinds MP (Conservative, East Hampshire) Charlotte Leslie MP (Conservative, Bristol North West) Ian Mearns MP (Labour, Gateshead) Tessa Munt MP (Liberal Democrat, Wells) Lisa Nandy MP (Labour, Wigan) Craig Whittaker MP (Conservative, Calder Valley) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/education-committee Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Kenneth Fox (Clerk), Elisabeth Bates (Second Clerk), Penny Crouzet (Committee Specialist), Benjamin Nicholls (Committee Specialist), Ameet Chudasama (Senior Committee Assistant), Kathryn Smith (Committee Assistant), Paul Hampson (Committee Support Assistant), and Brendan Greene (Office Support Assistant) Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Education Committee, House of Commons, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA.
    [Show full text]