DOCSLIB.ORG

5-YEAR REVIEW of Foreign Loggerhead Dpss

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
5-YEAR REVIEW of Foreign Loggerhead Dpss Loggerhead Sea Turtle (Caretta caretta) North Indian Ocean DPS, Southwest Indian Ocean DPS, Southeast Indo-Pacific Ocean DPS, South Pacific Ocean DPS, South Atlantic Ocean DPS, Northeast Atlantic Ocean DPS, and Mediterranean Sea DPS 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation 2021 National Marine Fisheries Service Office of Protected Resources Silver Spring, Maryland and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Division of International Conservation - IA Falls Church, Virginia 1 Table of Contents 1 GENERAL INFORMATION ............................................................................................... 3 1.1 Reviewers ......................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Methodology .................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Background ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.1 Federal Register Notice............................................................................................. 4 1.3.2 Listing History .......................................................................................................... 5 1.3.3 Associated rulemakings ............................................................................................ 5 1.3.4 Review History ......................................................................................................... 5 1.3.5 Species’ Recovery Priority Number ......................................................................... 6 1.3.6 Recovery Plan ........................................................................................................... 6 2 REVIEW ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Application of the 1996 Distinct Population Segment (DPS) policy ............................... 6 2.1.1 Is the species under review a vertebrate? .................................................................. 6 2.1.2 Is the species under review listed as a DPS? ............................................................ 6 2.1.3 Was the DPS listed prior to 1996? ............................................................................ 7 2.1.4 Is there relevant new information for this species regarding the application of the DPS policy? ............................................................................................................................. 7 2.2 Recovery Criteria ........................................................................................................... 11 2.2.1 Does the species have a final, approved recovery plan containing objective, measurable criteria? ............................................................................................................... 11 2.3 Updated Information and Current Species Status .......................................................... 11 2.3.1 Updated information applicable to all foreign DPSs .............................................. 11 2.3.2 North Indian Ocean DPS ........................................................................................ 22 2.3.3 Southwest Indian Ocean DPS ................................................................................. 30 2.3.4 Southeast Indo-Pacific Ocean DPS ......................................................................... 38 2.3.5 South Pacific Ocean DPS........................................................................................ 45 2.3.6 South Atlantic Ocean DPS ...................................................................................... 54 2.3.7 Northeast Atlantic Ocean DPS ................................................................................ 63 2.3.8 Mediterranean Sea DPS .......................................................................................... 72 3 RESULTS ............................................................................................................................. 85 3.1 Recommended Classification ......................................................................................... 85 4 RECOMMENDATONS FOR FUTURE ACTIONS ........................................................ 85 5 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................... 86 2 5-YEAR REVIEW Loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) North Indian Ocean DPS, Southwest Indian Ocean DPS, Southeast Indo-Pacific Ocean DPS, South Pacific Ocean DPS, South Atlantic Ocean DPS, Northeast Atlantic Ocean DPS, and Mediterranean Sea DPS 1 GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1 Reviewers NMFS Office of Protected Resources: Adrienne Lohe, 301-427-8442 USFWS Division of International Conservation: Earl Possardt, 703-358-2277 1.2 Methodology The purpose of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), is to provide a means to conserve the ecosystems upon which endangered and threatened species depend, to provide a program for the conservation of endangered and threatened species, and to take appropriate steps to recover endangered and threatened species. Under the ESA, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), together “we” or “the Services,” share responsibility to conserve sea turtles as described in the Memorandum of Understanding Defining the Roles of USFWS and NMFS in Joint Administration of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 as to Sea Turtles, established in 1977 and revised in 2015. In general, NMFS has jurisdiction for sea turtles in the marine environment, USFWS has jurisdiction for sea turtles in the terrestrial habitat, and the Services commit to working together as necessary to conserve and recover listed sea turtles. One of our responsibilities under the ESA is to conduct a review of each listed species at least every 5 years to determine whether its endangered or threatened status should be changed or removed (i.e., 5- year review, 16 U.S.C. 1533(c)(2)). The ESA requires us to make these determinations solely on the basis of the best scientific and commercial data available (16 U.S.C. 1533(b)(1)(A)). Under the ESA, the definition of species includes any subspecies of fish or wildlife or plants, and any distinct population segment (i.e., DPS) of any species of vertebrate fish or wildlife which interbreeds when mature (16 U.S.C. 1532). In 2011, after a status review of the species (the Status Review; Conant et al. 2009), the Services identified nine loggerhead sea turtle DPSs (76 FR 58868; September 22, 2011), in accordance with the Policy Regarding the Recognition of Distinct Vertebrate Population Segments Under the ESA (i.e., the DPS Policy; 61 FR 4722, February 7, 1996). On December 26, 2019, we initiated this 5-year review for the seven foreign DPSs: the North Indian Ocean DPS, Southwest Indian Ocean DPS, Southeast Indo-Pacific Ocean DPS, South Pacific Ocean DPS, South Atlantic Ocean DPS, Northeast Atlantic Ocean DPS, and Mediterranean Sea DPS (84 FR 70958). To compile the best available scientific and commercial data on the DPSs, we first reviewed the Status Review (Conant et al. 2009), which was based on the best available scientific and commercial data available at that time. We then searched for relevant new information on the foreign DPSs, their biology and habitat, and threats to their continued existence. Specifically, we searched for published literature in NMFS’ scientific literature database, and by using the following scientific search engines: Clarivate's Web of Science, ScienceDirect, BioOne Complete, ProQuest's Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts, JSTOR, EBSCO Academic Search and Environment Complete, and Google Scholar. We solicited relevant information from 3 other Federal agencies, States, Territories, Tribes, foreign governments, academia, nonprofit organizations, industry groups, and individuals by publishing a request in the Federal Register (84 FR 70958; December 26, 2019). Though we did not receive any responses to our Federal Register notice that were specific to the foreign DPSs, we compiled, reviewed, and evaluated available data. We did not conduct new empirical studies because the ESA requires the use of the best available scientific and commercial information. After compiling the data, we reviewed newly available information relevant to the DPS determination, following the DPS Policy. Under this policy, a DPS must be discrete and significant relative to its species. We asked whether the new data supported or refuted our previous determinations of discreteness and significance. Next, we considered the biology and habitat of the DPSs. We identified information that has become available since the publication of the Status Review in 2009. We also reviewed the best available information on abundance and trends, population demographics, genetics, and spatial distribution. We also assessed threats to each DPS by identifying and evaluating the ESA section 4(a)(1) factors (i.e., the five factor analysis; 16 U.S.C. 1533(a)(1)): 1. Present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of habitat or range 2. Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes 3. Disease or predation 4. Inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms 5. Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued existence Because the current abundance and trends are influenced by past threats, we focused
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ecology ECOLOGY Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Waterway Trading & Petroleum Services LLC KAZ Oil Terminal Project, Iraq
    Chapter 8 ‐ Ecology ECOLOGY Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Waterway Trading & Petroleum Services LLC KAZ Oil Terminal Project, Iraq Contents Page 8 Ecology 8‐1 8.1 Introduction 8‐1 8.2 Methodology 8‐1 8.2.1 Field Surveys 8‐2 8.2.2 Determining Conservation Value 8‐2 8.2.3 Ecological Impact Assessment 8‐3 8.2.4 Legislation 8‐4 8.3 Terrestrial Ecology Baseline Conditions 8‐5 8.3.1 Baseline Conditions – Desk Study 8‐5 8.3.2 Baseline Conditions ‐ Fieldwork 8‐8 8.4 Intertidal Ecology Baseline Conditions 8‐9 8.5 Marine Ecology 8‐20 8.5.1 Field Survey 8‐20 8.5.2 Baseline Data 8‐22 8.6 Project Site Conservation Value Assessment 8‐34 8.6.1 Ecological Baseline Summary 8‐37 8.7 Impact Assessment 8‐38 8.7.1 Mitigation Measures 8‐43 8.7.2 Residual Impacts 8‐44 014‐1287 Revision 01 December 2014 Page 8‐1 ECOLOGY Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Waterway Trading & Petroleum Services LLC KAZ Oil Terminal Project, Iraq 8 Ecology 8.1 Introduction This Chapter addresses the natural environment that could be affected by the proposals. It presents a description of the assessment methodology, observed baseline conditions, significant impacts and mitigation proposals relating to the terrestrial and marine ecology and habitats within the potential zone of influence of the proposed development. The project area comprises three distinct habitat zones: Terrestrial Zone (Characterised by bare soil and sparse sabkha vegetation); Intertidal Zone (Characterised by mud flats with limited vegetation and numerous mud‐ skipper colonies); and Marine Zone (Characterised by unvegetated bottom sediments and tidal estuarine waters).
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Emirates: an Archaeological and Historical Account of Developments in the Region C
    Before the Emirates: an Archaeological and Historical Account of Developments in the Region c. 5000 BC to 676 AD D.T. Potts Introduction In a little more than 40 years the territory of the former Trucial States and modern United Arab Emirates (UAE) has gone from being a blank on the archaeological map of Western Asia to being one of the most intensively studied regions in the entire area. The present chapter seeks to synthesize the data currently available which shed light on the lifestyles, industries and foreign relations of the earliest inhabitants of the UAE. Climate and Environment Within the confines of a relatively narrow area, the UAE straddles five different topographic zones. Moving from west to east, these are (1) the sandy Gulf coast and its intermittent sabkha; (2) the desert foreland; (3) the gravel plains of the interior; (4) the Hajar mountain range; and (5) the eastern mountain piedmont and coastal plain which represents the northern extension of the Batinah of Oman. Each of these zones is characterized by a wide range of exploitable natural resources (Table 1) capable of sustaining human groups practising a variety of different subsistence strategies, such as hunting, horticulture, agriculture and pastoralism. Tables 2–6 summarize the chronological distribution of those terrestrial faunal, avifaunal, floral, marine, and molluscan species which we know to have been exploited in antiquity, based on the study of faunal and botanical remains from excavated archaeological sites in the UAE. Unfortunately, at the time of writing the number of sites from which the inventories of faunal and botanical remains have been published remains minimal.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arabian Desert in the Uae Is a Two Million Square Kilometre Sea of Sand, Studded by the Glittering Cities of Dubai and Abu D
    PRESTIGE TRAVEL THE ARABIAN DESERT IN THE UAE IS A TWO MILLION on a SQUARE KILOMETRE SEA OF SAND, STUDDED BY THE GLITTERING CITIES OF DUBAI AND ABU DHABI. BETWEEN THEM APPEARS TO BE LITTLE ELSE THAN straight SHIFTING SAND, UNTIL YOU TURN OFF THE HIGHWAY. DESERT HIGHWAYby: keri harvey pictures: keri harvey and supplied ubai is where the sand is red, claim traditional nomadic Bedouins. They traversed the vast Arabian Desert navigating by the sun and stars – and the Dcolour of the sand. Today, we’re using a GPS, though the sand in Dubai is still red. In this city of ‘est’ we’ve been up the world’s highest building, ridden the longest metro, shopped in the biggest mall and now we’re heading across the emirate of Dubai to Abu Dhabi on an immaculate highway crossing an ocean of sand. It is here in the deep desert that you’ll find the soul of Arabia, rare Bedouin art, falcons, salukis and rare WWW.PRESTIGEMAG.CO.ZA wildlife. It’s an enticing offering that can also be enjoyed in luxury and splendour. A 40-minute drive from Dubai city and you’re in the 225km² Dubai Desert Conservation Reserve - the first conservation area to be proclaimed in the United Arab Emirates. It was set aside specifically to conserve the rare Arabian 57 56 oryx – ‘al maha’ in Arabic - which came dangerously close to extinction. As we drive into the reserve, a white line atop a sand dune in the distance is actually a herd of Arabian oryx, which is an enchanting welcome to the desert.
    [Show full text]
  • Searchable (4689
    NOTES FOR CONTRIBUTORS TRIBULUS is the new name given to the Bulletin of the Emirates Natural History Group. The group was founded in 1976, and over the next fourteen years, 42 issues of the Bulletin were published. The revised format of TRlBULUS permits the inclusion of black and white and colour photographs, not previously possible. TRlBULUS is published twice a year, in April and October. The aim of the publication, as for the Bulletin, is to create and maintain in standard form a collection of recordings, articles and analysis on topics of regional history and natural history, with the emphasis focussing on the United Arab Emirates and adjacent areas. Articles are welcomed from Group members and others, and guidelines are set out below. The information carried is as accurate as the Editorial Committee can determine, but opinions expressed are those of the authors alone. Correspondence and enquires should be sent to: The Editor, TRIBULUS, Emirates Natural History Group, P.O. Box 2380, Abu Dhabi - U.A.E. Editorial Board: H.E. Sheikh Nahyan bin Mubarak a1 Nahyan, Patron A. R. Western, Chief Editor, J. N. B. Brown, P, Hellyer. The plant motif above is of the genus Tribulus, of which The animal motif above is of a tiny golden bull, there are six species in the UAE. They all have pinnate excavated from the early Second Millennium grave at leaves, yellow flowers with free petals and distinctive Qattarah, AI Ain. The original is on display in AI Ain five-segmented fruits. They are found throughout the Museum, and measures above 5 cm by 4 cm.
    [Show full text]
  • Cull of the Wild a Contemporary Analysis of Wildlife Trapping in the United States
    Cull of the Wild A Contemporary Analysis of Wildlife Trapping in the United States Animal Protection Institute Sacramento, California Edited by Camilla H. Fox and Christopher M. Papouchis, MS With special thanks for their contributions to Barbara Lawrie, Dena Jones, MS, Karen Hirsch, Gil Lamont, Nicole Paquette, Esq., Jim Bringle, Monica Engebretson, Debbie Giles, Jean C. Hofve, DVM, Elizabeth Colleran, DVM, and Martin Ring. Funded in part by Edith J. Goode Residuary Trust The William H. & Mattie Wattis Harris Foundation The Norcross Wildlife Foundation Founded in 1968, the Animal Protection Institute is a national nonprofit organization dedicated to advocating for the protection of animals from cruelty and exploitation. Copyright © 2004 Animal Protection Institute Cover and interior design © TLC Graphics, www.TLCGraphics.com Indexing Services: Carolyn Acheson Cover photo: © Jeremy Woodhouse/Photodisc Green All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. For further information about the Animal Protection Institute and its programs, contact: Animal Protection Institute P.O. Box 22505 Sacramento, CA 95822 Phone: (916) 447-3085 Fax: (916) 447-3070 Email: [email protected] Web: www.api4animals.org Printed by Bang Publishing, Brainerd, Minnesota, USA ISBN 0-9709322-0-0 Library of Congress ©2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword . v Preface . vii Introduction . ix CHAPTERS 1. Trapping in North America: A Historical Overview . 1 2. Refuting the Myths . 23 3. Trapping Devices, Methods, and Research . 31 Primary Types of Traps Used by Fur Trappers in the United States .
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalence of Intestinal Nematodes of Red Foxes (Vulpes Vulpes) in North-West Poland
    Prevalence of intestinal nematodes of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in north-west Poland Agnieszka Tylkowska ( [email protected] ) Szkola Glowna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7406-7094 Bogumiła Pilarczyk Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny w Szczecinie Agnieszka Tomza-Marciniak Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny w Szczecinie Renata Pilarczyk Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny w Szczecinie Research Keywords: red fox, prevalence, helminths, nematodes, ecological indicators Posted Date: April 9th, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-21823/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/11 Abstract Background: The red fox (Vulpes vulpes) is a widely distributed animal in the world. This wild carnivore is also a common host of several dangerous zoonotic parasites, primarily nematodes. Nematodes of red foxes, such as Toxocara canis and Uncinaria stenocephala, can cause numerous health problems in humans and domesticated animals. The aim of the study was to determine the parameters of occurrence of nematodes in red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in north-western Poland. Methods: The study was carried out in north-western Poland. The research material consisted of 620 red foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Parasitological sections of the foxes were taken using the sedimentation and counting technique. Results: The prevalence of infestations with nematodes was 77.3%, while the mean infection intensity was 20.1 per animal. The presence of Toxocara canis, Toxascaris leonina, Uncinaria stenocephala and Trichuris vulpis was noted. The greatest prevalence was presented by Uncinaria stenocephala (34.0%). Male and female foxes displayed a similar prevalence of nematodes. Their presence was recorded in the duodenum, jejunum, ileum and caecum of the foxes, and they were signicantly more common in the jejunum than in other parts.
    [Show full text]
  • And Foxes (Vulpes Vulpes Arabica, V
    Zoological Studies 49(4): 437-452 (2010) Interactions between Green Turtles (Chelonia mydas) and Foxes (Vulpes vulpes arabica, V. rueppellii sabaea, and V. cana) on Turtle Nesting Grounds in the Northwestern Indian Ocean: Impacts of the Fox Community on the Behavior of Nesting Sea Turtles at the Ras Al Hadd Turtle Reserve, Oman Vanda Mariyam Mendonça1,2,*, Salim Al Saady3, Ali Al Kiyumi3, and Karim Erzini1 1Algarve Marine Sciences Centre (CCMAR), University of Algarve, Campus of Gambelas, Faro 8005-139, Portugal 2Expeditions International (EI-EMC International), P.O. Box 802, Sur 411, Oman 3Ministry of Environment and Climate Affairs, P.O. Box 323, Muscat 113, Oman (Accepted December 3, 2009) Vanda Mariyam Mendonça, Salim Al Saady, Ali Al Kiyumi, and Karim Erzini (2010) Interactions between green turtles (Chelonia mydas) and foxes (Vulpes vulpes arabica, V. rueppellii sabaea, and V. cana) on turtle nesting grounds in the northwestern Indian Ocean: impacts of the fox community on the behavior of nesting sea turtles at the Ras Al Hadd Turtle Reserve, Oman. Zoological Studies 49(4): 437-452. Green turtles Chelonia mydas nest year round at the Ras Al Hadd Nature Reserve, Oman, with a distinct lower-density nesting season from Oct. to May, and a higher-density nesting season from June to Sept. On these beaches, the main predators of turtle eggs and hatchlings are foxes Vulpes spp., wolves Canis lupus arabs, and wild cats Felis spp. and Caracal caracal schmitzi. During 1999-2001, both the nesting behavior of these turtles and the diets of foxes (the main predator on the beaches) were investigated, and we tested whether female turtles were able to avoid/reduce predation pressure on their eggs and hatchlings on the nesting grounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Density of Dens of the Red Fox (Vulpes Vulpes) in the Dubai Desert Conservation Reserve
    Density of dens of the Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) in the Dubai Desert Conservation Reserve Date of Survey August 2010 –February 2011 Author: Stephen Bell Conservation Officer 1 Contents Title 1 Content 2 Arabic Translation 3 Abstract 4 Introduction 4-5 Study Area 5 Methodology 5 Results and discussions 5-6 Acknowledgements 6 References 7 Appendix A A-8 Appendix B B-8 Appendix C C-9 Appendix D D-10 Appendix E E-11 2 Arabic Summary Translated by: Tamer Khafaga إن اب ار ار (ون) إ ر آت اوم و ات، وھو رف أ ّرد اب أ أر أواع اب و،ر اب ار واذب اردي ن أر ا وام ارا ارة ار ر ي دت أرى وذك ء ان وض أواع اوارض. ر اب ار اوان اود ن ات ال واده واره رات ارة ار ا واد 83 دو ول ام. ر ا ب ار وط ام ر ات وأر وع ن أواع اب ا ارى, راوح طول اوان ن د أ أ طرف ذ وا ( 300 – 555 م) ووزن ام ن ( 3 – 14 م) ور اذر أر ً ن ا, إ أن اب ار ر أر ر رى ارق اوط ر س اوع طق أرى ل اواع ا ن اب ار رة اورو. إن اب اراء وات از ف ادد ن ات ووع ظ اذا ن ارت ل (اس واددان ار) ا دت ارة واطور (طور ازارع) وذك اوا ور ات ا. رة ازاوج ون ن ر در و ر رار ن ل م ول ك ارة در اب ادد ن اوات اوا ذب اث, ووم اب ء ور ت ارض ار ل ارة او ن م, د م اور ط ا اط وذك دد أراد ارة, ن أن ون دال اور وادة أو ادد ن ادال.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plants of United Arab Emirates
    FACTS OF UAE TITLE- FACTS OF UAE 1 NATIVE PLANTS OF THE UAE Cornulaca monacantha – In Arabic it is known as had and djouri is a straggling, branched, woody shrub growing to a height of 60 centimeters (24 in). It is a desert plant found in the Middle East and the Sahara Desert hyacinth (Cistanche tubulosa) – Branchless parasite fleshy herb, up to 1m high with erect whitish single stem, simple and up to 4cm thick, stem arise from tuber. Common in coastal areas of the Arabian Gulf coast and on inland saline sand plains. NATIVE PLANTS 2 NATIVE PLANTS OF THE UAE Arfaj (Rhanterium epapposum) – Once a common dwarf shrub in many north-eastern parts of UAE, overgrazing has led to the disappearance of the species in many locations.- Ausaj (Lycium shawii) – Desert plant, common in the UAE in variety of habitats: gravel plains, hillsides, wadis and plantation. Safrawi (Dipterygium glaucum) – Perennial shrub but often flowering and fruiting in the first year. Very common in the UAE, along the Arabian gulf coast, often very close to beach lines, also on saline sand inland, except for the southern part of Abu Dhabi emirate. NATIVE PLANTS 3 NATIVE ANIMALS OF THE UAE Oryx leucoryx (Al maha, al baqr, al barra) – The Arabian Oryx is uniform white, while the flank stripe is absent . Arabian Oryx once occurred over all or most of the plains and deserts of the Arabian Peninsula. Arabian Red Fox (Al taleb al ahmer)- Is similar in color to the common Red Fox. Found throughout the UAE and can adapt to all habitats, from desert to mountains, as well as the urban environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Use Style: Paper Title
    Journal of Bioscience and Applied Research , 2016,Vol.2, No.11, PP.723-728 pISSN: 2356-9174, eISSN : 2356-9182 723 Journal of Bioscience and Applied Research WWW.JBSAR.com Food composition and feeding ecology of the Arabian Red Fox Vulpes vulpes arabica (Thomas, 1902) in Sakaka, northern Saudi Arabia Walid Fathy Mohammad1,2 and Mohammad Ibrahim Basuony3 1. Department of Biological and Geological Sciences, Faculty of Education, Ain Shams University, Egypt. 2. Department of Biology, College of Science, Aljouf University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. 3. Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Nasr City, Cairo, Egypt. (Corresponding author email: [email protected]) Abstract Wilson and Reeder, 2005; Feldhamer, et al., 2007 and Walid, 2011). The food composition and feeding ecology of the Arabian Study of food clarifies the role of this subspecies in Red Fox Vulpes vulpes arabica inhabiting Sakaka city in the energy flow and food chain of the ecosystem. It also the northern part of Saudi Arabia was studied using provides a foundation for understanding the foraging stomach contents analysis. The analysis of 32 stomach behaviour, population dynamics, habitat use and social contents during February 2015 to May 2016 showed a great organization of a species (Mills, 1992). The study of diet in diverse of food like mammals, birds, reptiles, insects, carnivores is very important, because they are often at the scorpions, cooked rice, plants and carrion. Diet end of a food chain and have important effects on the composition showed seasonal variations that associated distribution and abundance of other species. with changes in the availability of different food items.
    [Show full text]
  • Blanford's Fox in Saudi Arabia
    Cunningham and Wronski Blanford’s fox in Saudi Arabia Canid News Copyright © 2009 by the IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group. ISSN 1478-2677 The following is the established format for referencing this article: Cunningham, P.L. and Wronski, T. 2009. Blanford’s fox confirmed in the At-Tubaiq Protected Area (northern Saudi Arabia) and the Ibex Reserve (central Saudi Arabia). Canid News 12.4 [online] URL: http://www.canids.org/canidnews/12/Blanfords_fox_in_Saudi_Arabia.pdf. Distribution Update Blanford’s fox confirmed in the At-Tubaiq Protected Area (northern Saudi Arabia) and the Ibex Reserve (central Saudi Arabia) Peter L. Cunningham 1* and Torsten Wronski 1 1King Khalid Wildlife Research Centre, Thumamah, P. O. Box 61681, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Ara- bia and the Zoological Society of London. * Correspondence author: Email: [email protected] Keywords: Saudi Arabia, At-Tubaiq Protected Area, Ibex Reserve, distribution, range extension, Blanford’s fox, Vulpes cana Abstract Afghanistan, Pakistan and India and only re- cently noted to occur on the Arabian Peninsula (Kingdon 1990; Nader 1990; Al-Khalili 1993; Confirmed – new records – of Blanford’s fox Roberts 1997). Arabian specimens have been Vulpes cana from the At-Tubaiq Protected Area recorded from Oman, Israel/Palestine, Saudi in northern Saudi Arabia and the Ibex Reserve Arabia, Sinai Peninsula (Egypt) and the in central Saudi Arabia extends the recognised United Arab Emirates (Mendelssohn et al . range of the species within Saudi Arabia and 1987; Nader 1990; Harrison and Bates 1991; the Arabian Peninsula. Geffen et al. 1992a/b/c; Geffen et al. 1993; Al- Khalili 1993; Stuart and Stuart 1995; Spalton and Willis 1999; Llewellyn-Smith 2000; Cun- Introduction ningham and Howarth 2002; Drew 2003; Stu- art and Stuart 2003; Geffen et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plants of The
    NATIVE PLANTS OF THE UAE DESCRIPTION PICTURE Cornulaca monacantha – In Arabic it is known as had and djouri is a straggling, branched, woody shrub growing to a height of 60 centimeters (24 in). It is a desert plant found in the Middle East and the Sahara Desert hyacinth (Cistanche tubulosa) – Branchless parasite fleshy herb, up to 1m high with erect whitish single stem, simple and up to 4cm thick, stem arise from tuber. Common in coastal areas of the Arabian Gulf coast and on inland saline sand plains. Arta (Calligonum comosum) – Virtually leafless perennial shrub up to 2.5m tall, stem much branched from thick woody rootstock. Commonly found in sand plains, dunes and roadsides. Date Palm - Nakhl, Nakheel, Nakhla The tree grows up to 30m tall with a very slender trunk, covered with the remains of sheaths from fallen leaves. Cultivated throughout UAE at all elevations; tolerant to moderate salinity. NATIVE PLANTS OF THE UAE DESCRIPTION PICTURE Arfaj (Rhanterium epapposum) – Once a common dwarf shrub in many north-eastern parts of UAE, overgrazing has led to the disappearance of the species in many locations.- Ausaj (Lycium shawii) – Desert plant, common in the UAE in variety of habitats: gravel plains, hillsides, wadis and plantation. Safrawi (Dipterygium glaucum) - Perennial shrub but often flowering and fruiting in the first year. Very common in the UAE, along the Arabian gulf coast, often very close to beach lines, also on saline sand inland, except for the southern part of Abu Dhabi emirate. Shuntop (Pentatropis nivalis) – Perennial vine, twining branches, climber, stems with rough bark; up to 400cm.
    [Show full text]