DOCSLIB.ORG

The Status of Coronals in Standard American English an Optimality-Theoretic Account

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Status of Coronals in Standard American English an Optimality-Theoretic Account The Status of Coronals in Standard American English An Optimality-Theoretic Account Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Philosophischen Fakultät der Universität zu Köln vorgelegt von Sybil Scholz geb. in Düsseldorf Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Jon Erickson Zweitgutachterin: Prof. Dr. Susan Olsen Köln 2003 For Aleksandra Davidovi ć CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS i PREFACE: LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS, LIST OF CONSTRAINTS, TYPOGRAPHICAL CONVENTIONS, AND PHONETIC SYMBOLS ii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION—PROCEDURE AND ORGANIZATION 1 1.1 Data: their status within generative theory 1 1.2 Method 5 1.3 Theory: what version of OT? 6 1.4 Organization of the dissertation 10 CHAPTER 2: AMERICAN ENGLISH 12 2.1 The English of the SBCSAE (Part I) 12 2.2 Standard American English 18 2.2.1 Western as the default variety 18 2.2.2 Standards: formal, informal, vernacular 22 CHAPTER 3: CLASSIFICATION OF CORONALS 28 3.1 History of the feature [coronal] 28 3.1.1 Pre-SPE feature systems 28 3.1.2 The feature [coronal] within the SPE model 31 3.2 The coronal articulators 37 3.2.1 Movable articulators 38 3.2.2 Articulatory targets 40 3.3 Phonetic evidence for coronals 42 3.3.1 Evidence from typology 43 3.3.2 Evidence from acoustics and perception 45 3.3.3 Evidence from articulation 48 CHAPTER 4: THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF OT 52 4.1 The components of an OT grammar 52 4.1.1 Basic assumptions 52 4.1.2 OT architecture 56 4.2 Universality and markedness 61 4.2.1 Markedness in SPE 63 4.2.2 Naturalness and OT 67 4.3 Representations and levels of analysis 76 4.3.1 Underspecification theories 78 4.3.2 Nonlinear representations 83 4.3.3 The Grounding Hypothesis 90 4.3.4 Representations in OT 95 4.3.5 Phonological domains in OT 101 4.4 Summary 103 CHAPTER 5: THEORETICAL PREMISES FOR AN ANALYSIS OF THE BEHAVIOR OF CORONALS UNDER OT 104 5.1 Introduction 104 5.2 The problematic notion of process under OT 104 5.3 The significance of the perceptual domain for phonology 107 5.4 Functionalism vs. formalism 112 5.5 Treatments of phonological contrast 118 5.5.1 Standard GP representation of contrast 119 5.5.2 Correspondence Theory and contrast 120 5.5.3 Dispersion Theory and contrast 123 5.6 Formalization of functional principles 127 5.6.1 Types of scales under OT 127 5.6.2 Types of constraint families 129 CHAPTER 6: DISTRIBUTIONAL PROPERTIES OF CORONALS IN SAE 132 6.1 Introduction 132 6.2 Paradigmatic constraints on the SAE consonant inventory 133 6.2.1 The emergence of sound inventories under OT 134 6.2.2 Segmental contrast in SAE 136 6.3 Syntagmatic constraints on SAE syllable structure 140 6.3.1 Syllable onsets 143 6.3.2 Syllable codas 149 CHAPTER 7: AN OT MODEL OF CORRESPONDENCES BETWEEN PHONETICS AND PHONOLOGY 154 7.1 Introduction 154 7.2 Previous generative analyses of phonological alternations 155 7.3 Perceptual and articulatory constraints in an OT grammar 167 7.3.1 Communication model 167 7.3.2 Perceptual and articulatory representations 169 7.3.3 Formalization of perceptual and articulatory representations as OT constraints 172 CHAPTER 8: ALTERNATIONAL PROPERTIES OF CORONALS IN SAE 178 8.1 Introduction 178 8.2 Minimization of segmental contrast 179 8.2.1 Assimilation 180 8.2.1.1 Place assimilation 181 8.2.1.2 Laryngeal assimilation 187 8.2.2 Deletion 199 8.3 Maximization of segmental contrast 206 8.3.1 Epenthesis 206 8.3.2 Dissimilation 212 8.4 Summary 216 CHAPTER 9: AN OT CRITIQUE—SOME UNRESOLVED ISSUES 219 9.1 Introduction—the nature of OT 219 9.2 The input—an OT lexicon 220 9.3 GEN —the candidate set 224 9.4 The concept of the constraint 226 9.4.1 Absolute vs. nonabsolute universals 227 9.4.2 Universality and innateness of CON 230 9.5 Eval—the *-specific ranking 231 9.6 Explanatory notions under OT 232 9.6.1 Perceptual distinction and articulatory effort 232 9.6.2 Markedness 235 CHAPTER 10: CONCLUSIONS 238 10.1 Coronals 238 10.2 OT 239 REFERENCES 240 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Samantha Hume, Wolf-Dietrich Bald, Ruth Baumert, Ute Breidenbach, Jon Erickson, Melinda Möller, Susan Olsen, Martha Wassen, and Bella Palmera for their various contributions, their help and emotional support. ABBREVIATIONS AND CONSTRAINTS iii PREFACE List of abbreviations, list of constraints, typographical conventions, and phonetic symbols ABBREVIATIONS AAVE African American Vernacular English AP Articulatory Phonology AT articulator theory ATR advanced tongue root CON universal set of CONSTRAINTS DP Declarative Phonology EPG electropalatography EVAL EVALUATOR GA General American GEN GENERATOR GP Generative Phonology GT Generative Theory IPA International Phonetic Alphabet MP-rule morphophonemic rule MSC morpheme structure condition MT Markedness Theory NGP Natural Generative Phonology NP Natural Phonology OCP Obligatory Contour Principle PREFACE iv OT Optimality Theory P-rule phonological rule PPT Principles & Parameters Theory PT place of articulation theory PW phonological word ROA Rutgers Optimality Archive RP Received Pronunciation RTR retracted tongue root RU Radical Underspecification SAE Standard American English SBCSAE Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English SBE Standard British English SLH Strict Layer Hypothesis SPC surface phonetic constraint SPE Sound Pattern of English (Chomsky & Halle 1968) SR surface representation SSE Standard Scottish English SSP Sonority Sequencing Principle TCRS Theory of Constraints and Repair Strategies UG Universal Grammar UR underlying representation UT underspecification theory CONSTRAINTS (25) AND THEIR DESCRIPTION ASSIM /L AR assimilate laryngeal features ASSIM /P LACE assimilate place features DELETE /C OR delete coronal segment DEP –IO output is dependent on input DEP -IO/O NSET dependency with respect to segments in onsets DEP –IO/POA dependency with respect to place of articulation ABBREVIATIONS AND CONSTRAINTS v EPENTHESIZE epenthesize segment FAITHFULNESS faithfulness to input *GESTURE /C OR no coronal gesture *GESTURE /D OR no dorsal gesture *GESTURE /L AB no labial gesture IDENT -IO identity between input and output correspondents IDENT IO/FO NSET identity with respect to features (F) of segments in onsets IDENT IO/FS ÝL identity with respect to Fs of segments in stressed syllables IDENT IO/L AR identity with respect to laryngeal features IDENT IO/MOA identity with respect to manner of articulation IDENT IO/POA identity with respect to place of articulation MARKEDNESS no marked structures MAX –IO input is maximally present in output MAX –IO/O NSET maximality with respect to segments in onsets MAX –IO/POA maximality with respect to place of articulation OBS /V OI an obstruent must be voiceless OCP(F) no adjacent identical elements on a given tier SONORITY onsets must increase and codas must decrease in sonority SON /V OI a sonorant must be voiced CONVENTIONS AND SYMBOLS The phonetic symbols I will use for the transcription of consonants are the common ones taken from the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) with affricates written as digraphs (International Phonetic Association 1999). For the vowels I chose the symbols following Wells (1982: xviii). C constraint (C 1, C 2 = constraint one, constraint two) C consonant (C 1, C 2 = consonant one, consonant two) V vowel G glide PREFACE vi L liquid N nasal F fricative A affricate P plosive Б glottal stop # word boundary + morpheme boundary | | perceptual specification [ ] articulatory specifications or phonetic material / / perceptual input or phonemic material < > orthographical material [±coronal] SPE -type distinctive feature (part of feature bundle) CORONAL non-linear class node (part of feature geometry) [±anterior] non-linear terminal feature (part of feature geometry) ' minute (25' 30" = 25 minutes and 30 seconds) " second (25' 30" = 25 minutes and 30 seconds) CHAPTER 1 Introduction: procedure and organization 1.1 DATA: THEIR STATUS WITHIN GENERATIVE THEORY As I am not a native speaker of English, the data which appear in the examples of this dissertation stem from a computer corpus of spoken Standard American English (SAE)—the Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English ( SBCSAE ). The corpus consists of a large body of machine-readable natural speech data, which are used as a basis for an analysis of a class of sounds—the coronal consonants. In contrast to other classes of sounds, coronals display truly astonishing properties. The theoretical framework for my investigation is Optimality Theory (OT), which is the most recent theoretical development within generative theory. Depending on the theoretical framework within which a linguistic study is situated, naturalistic corpus data have quite a variable status. Such data are collected, for example in the case of the SBCSAE (cf. chapter 2.1 below), by making audio- recordings of informants' spontaneous speech in natural settings, e.g. at home, often without their prior knowledge of being recorded. This means the danger of falling into the trap of the Observer's Paradox is avoided by researchers. The Observer's Paradox states that, in order to study human communication, data must be collected from informants and the very act of collection, i.e. some form of observation, may affect the phenomena under study (Labov 1972b: 209). In the case of recordings of broadcast news, for example, the effects of observation approach zero. It must be assumed, however, that the Observer's Paradox arises in any kind of conversation when the participants know that they are being recorded, especially where microphones are within plain sight. Here one might expect informants to believe that they should monitor their speech but sometimes they also forget to do so. Naturalistic CHAPTER 1 2 corpus data differ from data collected from experimental studies in that they do not yield introspective well-formedness judgements. An obvious advantage of experimental studies is that the set-up of the experiment enables linguists to elicit very specific data from the subjects tested.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely afreet reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 Nortti Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor. Ml 48106-1346 USA 313.'761-4700 800/ 521-0600 Order Number 9401286 The phonetics and phonology of Korean prosody Jun, Sun-Ah, Ph.D. The Ohio State University, 1993 300 N. Zeeb Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • John Hart's Works on English Orthography and Pronunciation
    Linguistic Society of America Review Reviewed Work(s): John Hart's Works on English Orthography and Pronunciation, 1551, 1569, 1570: Part II, Phonology by Bror Danielsson Review by: Morris Halle and Samuel Jay Keyser Source: Language, Vol. 43, No. 3, Part 1 (Sep., 1967), pp. 773-787 Published by: Linguistic Society of America Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/411817 Accessed: 12-06-2018 19:09 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms Linguistic Society of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Language This content downloaded from 18.189.25.183 on Tue, 12 Jun 2018 19:09:42 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms REVIEWS 773 --. 1938.1938. GriechischeGriechische Grammatik, Grammatik, erster erster Band. Band. Muinchen, Muinchen, C. H. C. Beck. H. Beck. THIEME, PAUL.PAUL. 1929. 1929. Das Das Plusquamperfektum Plusquamperfektum im imVeda. Veda. G6ttingen, G6ttingen, Vandenhoeck Vandenhoeck und und Ruprecht. --. 1938. Der Fremdling im 1Rgveda. Leipzig. --. 1957. Mitra and Aryaman. (Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, 41.) New Haven, Yale University Press. WACKERNAGEL, JAKOB. 1926. Kleine Beitrige zur indischen Wortkunde, 2: pdlayati. Beitriige zur Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte Indiens, Festgabe Hermann Jacobi zum 75.
    [Show full text]
  • Chain Shifts in First Language Acquisition
    CHAIN SHIFTS IN FIRST LANGUAGE ACQUISITION MASTER’S THESIS BY FRANSIEN WALTON MASTER’S PROGRAMME TAAL, MENS EN MAATSCHAPPIJ TAALWETENSCHAP UNIVERSITY OF UTRECHT STUDENT NUMBER 0419273 SUPERVISOR PROF. DR. RENÉ KAGER SECOND READER PROF. DR. WIM ZONNEVELD 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE PREFACE 5 1. INTRODUCTION 7 2. PREVIOUS RESEARCH 14 2.1 EARLY GENERATIVE GRAMMAR 15 2.1.1 SMITH (1973) 17 2.1.2 MACKEN (1980) 19 2.2 OPTIMALITY THEORY 21 2.2.1 INTRODUCTION TO OPTIMALITY THEORY 21 2.2.2 CHAIN SHIFTS IN OPTIMALITY THEORY 26 2.2.3 LOCAL CONSTRAINT CONJUNCTION 28 2.2.4 FAITHFULNESS TO INPUT PROMINENCE 39 2.2.5 OPTIMALITY THEORY WITH CANDIDATE CHAINS 52 2.2.6 UNDERSPECIFIED UNDERLYING REPRESENTATIONS 58 2.3 CONCLUSION 62 3. A NEW PROPOSAL 65 3.1 INDEPENDENT PROCESSES 68 3.2 ARTICULATORY DIFFICULTIES 70 3.3 UNDERLYING REPRESENTATIONS 74 3.4 MISPERCEPTION 79 3.5 PREDICTIONS REVISITED 83 3.6 CONCLUSION 86 4. DISCUSSION 88 5. CONCLUSION 103 REFERENCES 105 3 4 PREFACE The idea for this thesis originated in the course Phonological Acquisition taught by René Kager. I read the article On the characterization of a chain shift in normal and delayed phonological acquisition by Daniel Dinnsen and Jessica Barlow (1998) and was intrigued by the phenomenon. After I started reading more on the subject, I became increasingly unhappy with the proposed analyses in the literature and decided to dive deeper into the matter. The result is this thesis. I would like to thank René for his useful comments, critical questions and positive feedback.
    [Show full text]
  • Handouts for Advanced Phonology: a Course Packet Steve Parker GIAL
    Handouts for Advanced Phonology: A Course Packet Steve Parker GIAL and SIL International Dallas, 2016 Copyright © 2016 by Steve Parker and other contributors Page 1 of 304 Preface This set of materials is designed to be used as handouts accompanying an advanced course in phonology, particularly at the graduate level. It is specifically intended to be used in conjunction with two textbooks: Phonology in generative grammar (Kenstowicz 1994), and Optimality theory (Kager 1999). However, this course packet could potentially also be adapted for use with other phonology textbooks. The materials included here have been developed by myself and others over many years, in conjunction with courses in phonology taught at SIL programs in North Dakota, Oregon, Dallas, and Norman, OK. Most recently I have used them at GIAL. Many of the special phonetic characters appearing in these materials use IPA fonts available as freeware from the SIL International website. Unless indicated to the contrary on specific individual handouts, all materials used in this packet are the copyright of Steve Parker. These documents are intended primarily for educational use. You may make copies of these works for research or instructional purposes (under fair use guidelines) free of charge and without further permission. However, republication or commercial use of these materials is expressly prohibited without my prior written consent. Steve Parker Graduate Institute of Applied Linguistics Dallas, 2016 Page 2 of 304 1 Table of contents: list of handouts included in this packet Day 1: Distinctive features — their definitions and uses -Pike’s premises for phonological analysis ......................................................................... 7 -Phonemics analysis flow chart ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lexical Phonology and the History of English
    LEXICAL PHONOLOGY AND THE HISTORY OF ENGLISH APRIL McMAHON Department of Linguistics University of Cambridge PUBLISHED BY THE PRESS SYNDICATE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, UK www.cup.cam.ac.uk 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011±4211, USA www.cup.org 10 Stamford Road, Oakleigh, Melbourne 3166, Australia # April McMahon 2000 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2000 Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge Typeset in Times 10/13pt. [ce] A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication data McMahon, April M. S. Lexical Phonology and the history of English / April McMahon. p. cm. ± (Cambridge studies in linguistics; 91) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0 521 47280 6 hardback 1. English language ± Phonology, Historical. 2. English language ± History. 3. Lexical Phonology. I. Title. II. Series. PE1133.M37 2000 421'.5 ± dc21 99±28845 CIP ISBN 0 521 47280 6 hardback Contents Acknowledgements page xi 1 The roÃle of history 1 1.1 Internal and external evidence 1 1.2 Lexical Phonology and its predecessor 5 1.3 Alternative models 13 1.4 The structure of the book 33 2 Constraining the model: current
    [Show full text]
  • Phonetics and Phonology Seminar Introduction to Linguistics, Andrew
    Phonetics and Phonology Phonetics and Phonology Voicing: In voiced sounds, the vocal cords (=vocal folds, Stimmbände) are pulled together Seminar Introduction to Linguistics, Andrew McIntyre and vibrate, unlike in voiceless sounds. Compare zoo/sue, ban/pan. Tests for voicing: 1 Phonetics vs. phonology Put hand on larynx. You feel more vibrations with voiced consonants. Phonetics deals with three main areas: Say [fvfvfv] continuously with ears blocked. [v] echoes inside your head, unlike [f]. Articulatory phonetics: speech organs & how they move to produce particular sounds. Acoustic phonetics: what happens in the air between speaker & hearer; measurable 4.2 Description of English consonants (organised by manners of articulation) using devices such as a sonograph, which analyses frequencies. The accompanying handout gives indications of the positions of the speech organs Auditory phonetics: how sounds are perceived by the ear, how the brain interprets the referred to below, and the IPA description of all sounds in English and other languages. information coming from the ear. Phonology: study of how particular sounds are used (in particular languages, in languages 4.2.1 Plosives generally) to distinguish between words. Study of how sounds form systems in (particular) Plosive (Verschlusslaut): complete closure somewhere in vocal tract, then air released. languages. Examples of phonological observations: (2) Bilabial (both lips are the active articulators): [p,b] in pie, bye The underlined sound sequence in German Strumpf can occur in the middle of words (3) Alveolar (passive articulator is the alveolar ridge (=gum ridge)): [t,d] in to, do in English (ashtray) but not at the beginning or end. (4) Velar (back of tongue approaches soft palate (velum)): [k,g] in cat, go In pan and span the p-sound is pronounced slightly differently.
    [Show full text]
  • Speech Perception
    UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report (2010) Chapter 5 (of Acoustic and Auditory Phonetics, 3rd Edition - in press) Speech perception When you listen to someone speaking you generally focus on understanding their meaning. One famous (in linguistics) way of saying this is that "we speak in order to be heard, in order to be understood" (Jakobson, Fant & Halle, 1952). Our drive, as listeners, to understand the talker leads us to focus on getting the words being said, and not so much on exactly how they are pronounced. But sometimes a pronunciation will jump out at you - somebody says a familiar word in an unfamiliar way and you just have to ask - "is that how you say that?" When we listen to the phonetics of speech - to how the words sound and not just what they mean - we as listeners are engaged in speech perception. In speech perception, listeners focus attention on the sounds of speech and notice phonetic details about pronunciation that are often not noticed at all in normal speech communication. For example, listeners will often not hear, or not seem to hear, a speech error or deliberate mispronunciation in ordinary conversation, but will notice those same errors when instructed to listen for mispronunciations (see Cole, 1973). --------begin sidebar---------------------- Testing mispronunciation detection As you go about your daily routine, try mispronouncing a word every now and then to see if the people you are talking to will notice. For instance, if the conversation is about a biology class you could pronounce it "biolochi". After saying it this way a time or two you could tell your friend about your little experiment and ask if they noticed any mispronounced words.
    [Show full text]
  • Trask's Historical Linguistics
    Trask’s Historical Linguistics Trask’s Historical Linguistics, Third Edition, is an accessible introduction to historical linguistics – the study of language change over time. This engaging book is illustrated with language examples from all six continents, and covers the fundamental concepts of language change, methods for historical linguistics, linguistic reconstruction, sociolinguistic aspects of language change, language contact, the birth and death of languages, language and prehistory and the issue of very remote relations. This third edition of the renowned Trask’s Historical Linguistics is fully revised and updated and covers the most recent developments in historical linguistics, including: ᭹ more detail on morphological change including cutting-edge discussions of iconization ᭹ coverage of recent developments in sociolinguistic explanations of variation and change ᭹ new case studies focusing on Germanic languages and American and New Zealand English, and updated exercises covering each of the topics within the book ᭹ a brand new companion website featuring material for both professors and students, including discussion questions and exercises as well as discussions of the exercises within the book. Trask’s Historical Linguistics is essential reading for all students of language, linguistics and related disciplines. The accompanying website can be found at www.routledge.com/cw/trask Robert McColl Millar is Professor in Linguistics and Scottish Language at the University of Aberdeen. His most recent books include English Historical Sociolinguistics (2012) and (with William Barras and Lisa Marie Bonnici) Lexical Variation and Attrition in the Scottish Fishing Communities (2014). Larry Trask was Professor of Linguistics at the University of Sussex and an authority on Basque language and historical linguistics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Syllable Structure in Nyangatom
    Studies in Ethiopian Languages, 6 (2017), 1-12 Article The Syllable Structure in Nyangatom Moges Yigezu (Addis Ababa University) [email protected] Abstract The syllable structure in Nyangatom is a key phonological unit that plays a central role in the organization of the phonological structure. The core syllable has a fairly complex structure consisting of a branching onset, an obligatory nucleus and a non- branching coda which is optional. The question of syllabification, that is, the division of words into syllables, both in complex onsets and reduplicated words, appear to be an interesting aspect of the phonology. The analysis of the internal structure of the syllable structure of Nyangatom shows that the Mora theory, rather than the traditional onset-rhyme conception, provides an insightful explanation in determining the syllable boundaries of disyllabic and multisyllabic words involving sequences of consonants as well as in the analysis of reduplicated words. 1 Introduction Nyangatom is an Eastern Nilotic language classified as a member of the Turkana- Teso cluster along with Toposa and Jie (Vossen 1982). Literature on the grammatical description of the language is still scanty. Some preliminary studies include Dimmendaal (2007), Kadanya & Schroder (2011) and Moges (2016). The current contribution is an attempt to add to the scanty literature by describing an aspect of the phonology of the language focusing on the syllable structure. The syllable structure in Nynagatom, as in other languages, is a key phonological unit and plays a pivotal role in the overall organization of the phonology of the language. In describing the internal structure of the syllable in Nyangatom, the Mora theory has been employed.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Title of Document: MEG, PSYCHOPHYSICAL AND
    ABSTRACT Title of Document: MEG, PSYCHOPHYSICAL AND COMPUTATIONAL STUDIES OF LOUDNESS, TIMBRE, AND AUDIOVISUAL INTEGRATION Julian Jenkins III, Ph.D., 2011 Directed By: Professor David Poeppel, Department of Biology Natural scenes and ecological signals are inherently complex and understanding of their perception and processing is incomplete. For example, a speech signal contains not only information at various frequencies, but is also not static; the signal is concurrently modulated temporally. In addition, an auditory signal may be paired with additional sensory information, as in the case of audiovisual speech. In order to make sense of the signal, a human observer must process the information provided by low-level sensory systems and integrate it across sensory modalities and with cognitive information (e.g., object identification information, phonetic information). The observer must then create functional relationships between the signals encountered to form a coherent percept. The neuronal and cognitive mechanisms underlying this integration can be quantified in several ways: by taking physiological measurements, assessing behavioral output for a given task and modeling signal relationships. While ecological tokens are complex in a way that exceeds our current understanding, progress can be made by utilizing synthetic signals that encompass specific essential features of ecological signals. The experiments presented here cover five aspects of complex signal processing using approximations of ecological signals : (i) auditory integration of complex tones comprised of different frequencies and component power levels; (ii) audiovisual integration approximating that of human speech; (iii) behavioral measurement of signal discrimination; (iv) signal classification via simple computational analyses and (v) neuronal processing of synthesized auditory signals approximating speech tokens.
    [Show full text]
  • Sympathy and Phonological Opacity* John J
    Sympathy and phonological opacity* John J. McCarthy University of Massachusetts, Amherst 1 Statement of the problem A central idea in rule-based phonology is the serial derivation (Chomsky and Halle 1968). In a serial derivation, an underlying form passes through a number of intermediate representations on its way to the surface: (1) Serial Derivation Underlying representation = UR UR transformed by rule 1 = output1 Output1 transformed by rule 2 = output2 ... Outputn-1 transformed by rule n = Surface representation Implementational details can differ: the order of rules might be stipulated or it might be derived from universal principles; the steps might be called "rules", "cycles", or "levels"; the steps might involve applying rules or enforcing constraints. But, details aside, the defining characteristic of a serial derivation, in the sense I will employ here, is the preeminence of the chronological metaphor: the underlying form is transformed into a succession of distinct, accessible intermediate representations on its way to the surface. I will call any theory with this property "serialism". *This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under grant SBR-9420424. Versions of it were presented at MIT (4/4/97), the Hopkins Optimality Workshop/Maryland Mayfest ‘97 (5/11/97), the LSA Linguistic Institute (7/22/97), the University of Amsterdam (9/25/97), Ohio State University (10/24/97), UT Austin (11/7/97), and the Rutgers Optimality Research Group (5/15/98). I acknowledge with particular gratitude the comments of Alan Prince;
    [Show full text]
  • GOO-80-02119 392P
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 228 863 FL 013 634 AUTHOR Hatfield, Deborah H.; And Others TITLE A Survey of Materials for the Study of theUncommonly Taught Languages: Supplement, 1976-1981. INSTITUTION Center for Applied Linguistics, Washington, D.C. SPONS AGENCY Department of Education, Washington, D.C.Div. of International Education. PUB DATE Jul 82 CONTRACT GOO-79-03415; GOO-80-02119 NOTE 392p.; For related documents, see ED 130 537-538, ED 132 833-835, ED 132 860, and ED 166 949-950. PUB TYPE Reference Materials Bibliographies (131) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC16 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Annotated Bibliographies; Dictionaries; *InStructional Materials; Postsecondary Edtmation; *Second Language Instruction; Textbooks; *Uncommonly Taught Languages ABSTRACT This annotated bibliography is a supplement tothe previous survey published in 1976. It coverslanguages and language groups in the following divisions:(1) Western Europe/Pidgins and Creoles (European-based); (2) Eastern Europeand the Soviet Union; (3) the Middle East and North Africa; (4) SouthAsia;(5) Eastern Asia; (6) Sub-Saharan Africa; (7) SoutheastAsia and the Pacific; and (8) North, Central, and South Anerica. The primaryemphasis of the bibliography is on materials for the use of theadult learner whose native language is English. Under each languageheading, the items are arranged as follows:teaching materials, readers, grammars, and dictionaries. The annotations are descriptive.Whenever possible, each entry contains standardbibliographical information, including notations about reprints and accompanyingtapes/records
    [Show full text]