Overview and Scrutiny Emergency Services Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Overview and Scrutiny Emergency Services Review Overview and Scrutiny Emergency Services Review Overview and Scrutiny Committee October 2013 Membership of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee in 2013/14: Councillor Alan Hall (Chair) Councillor Helen Gibson Councillor Kevin Bonavia (Vice-Chair) Councillor Sven Griesenbeck Councillor Olufunke Abidoye Councillor Carl Handley Councillor Jackie Addison Councillor Michael Harris Councillor Obajimi Adefiranye Councillor Ami Ibitson Councillor Anne Affiku Councillor Mark Ingleby Councillor Christine Allison Councillor Stella Jeffrey Councillor Abdeslam Amrani Councillor Darren Johnson Councillor Pauline Beck Councillor Madeliene Long Councillor Paul Bell Councillor Chris Maines Councillor John Bowen Councillor Jim Mallory Councillor David Britton Councillor Pauline Morrison Councillor Duwayne Brooks Councillor John Muldoon Councillor Suzannah Clarke Councillor Marion Nisbet Councillor Jenni Clutten Councillor Sam Owolabi-Oluyole Councillor Liam Curran Councillor Stephen Padmore Councillor Vincent Davis Councillor Jacq Paschoud Councillor Amanda De Ryk Councillor John Paschoud Councillor Alexander Feakes Councillor Philip Peake Councillor Peggy Fitzsimmons Councillor Eva Stamirowski Councillor Julia Fletcher Councillor Alan Till Councillor Patsy Foreman Councillor Dan Whittle Councillor Vicky Foxcroft Contents 1. Chair’s introduction .............................................................................. 2 2. Executive summary ............................................................................. 3 3. Recommendations .............................................................................. 7 4. Purpose and structure of review ........................................................ 10 5. Findings ............................................................................................. 14 6. Finance .............................................................................................. 15 7. Assets ................................................................................................ 21 8. Perception ......................................................................................... 29 9. Response .......................................................................................... 38 10. Prevention ......................................................................................... 66 11. Access ............................................................................................... 79 12. Partnerships ...................................................................................... 87 13. Future ................................................................................................ 92 14. Monitoring and ongoing scrutiny ....................................................... 98 15. Glossary of terms .............................................................................. 99 16. Sources ........................................................................................... 103 1 1. Chair’s introduction The Emergency Services Review is the culmination of many months hard work by Overview & Scrutiny at Lewisham Council. I would like to thank the small scrutiny team for all their guidance and dedication. Councillors of all parties have examined the Ambulance, Fire and Police services in detail including Lewisham Hospital’s Accident and Emergency department. The common themes emerging from the review are that there are significant funding reductions leading to major service changes. Furthermore, services that aim to reduce demand like prevention and probation are under severe strain too. The Emergency Services Review shows that 2010 was a high water mark for Lewisham’s 999 services. This review would not have been possible without the co-operation and participation of the Ambulance, Fire and Police borough leaders and I would like to thank them for all their efforts. Since the Emergency Services Review was agreed the Court of Appeal has ruled that the Secretary of State for Health, Jeremy Hunt did not have the power to make decisions on Lewisham Hospital following the appointment of a Trust Special Administrator for another NHS Trust. All this shows that our final recommendation: “The Mayor and Council must continue to be vigilant to ensure that Lewisham has the best possible Emergency Services” is prescient. Councillor Alan Hall Chair of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee 2. Executive summary Lewisham is a diverse, vibrant and well-connected south east London borough. Its population is fluid and dynamic, accessing London’s variety of employment, leisure and cultural facilities. The population has in recent years been impacted most significantly by austerity, with incomes down, significant benefit reductions and growing levels of homelessness. All local public service agencies have been facing rising demand and significant financial constraints. The government has proposed to cut an average of 20% from government spending over the next 4 years and reduce the government’s budget by £83bn.Local government has been particularly badly affected, with the largest proportionate share of spending cuts. Lewisham Council has implemented major organisational and service changes over the past three years, reducing its overall net revenue budget by £82m. £17m of savings agreed for 2014/15, with a further £85m of savings required by 2016/17 from the current revenue budget of £284m. It is against this background that the dependency on emergency services is seen to be most acute – as numbers of local residents grow, household stress intensifies and the most vulnerable residents face the biggest pressure on household budgets in living memory. All these factors have an influence on demand for local emergency services and associated risks to life and community well-being. Finance The London Fire Brigade’s funding has reduced by £52m in the last four years, while a further savings target of £45.4m over the next two years has been added. The London Fire Brigade aims to achieve this through reducing the number of fire stations, appliances and fire station staff in London. The Metropolitan Police Service is required to save £500m from 2013 to 2016. This follows savings delivered in 2011/12 of £146m and £70m 2012/13. These further savings will be delivered through changes to the rank mix of police officers and the policing model used, reductions in the cost of back office support, more efficient use of property and reductions in the cost of IT support. The NHS is required to make total savings of £20 billion per year by 2014/15 and trusts throughout the NHS have efficiency targets of around 4-6 per cent per year. The London Ambulance Service’s budget will have a reduction of £54m by 2015/16, which will largely be achieved by a reduction in London Ambulance Service staff posts. However the London Ambulance Service recently received £14.8 million of extra funding to deal with the increased demand for services. In addition to the pressures on the London Ambulance Service, there has been recent uncertainty about the status of Lewisham Hospital’s accident and emergency unit due to the appointment of a Trust Special Administrator to look at the problems associated with the South London Healthcare NHS Trust. Among the recommendations made by the Trust Special Administrator were some related to Lewisham Hospital, including proposals to close its accident and emergency unit. Lewisham Council strongly objected to the proposals and launched a successful legal challenge in the High Court against to 3 the decision to implement these recommendations. The government appeal against this ruling was unsuccessful. Assets The disposal and more efficient utilisation of assets forms a key part in the savings identified by the emergency services. However, their future use will be influenced by the planning frameworks and policies in place and planning protections for community facilities as set out in the London Plan and the Lewisham Core Strategy. The London Plan is the overall strategic plan for London, and includes a strong theme promoting and protecting community and other social facilities. The Lewisham Core Strategy places a strong emphasis on ensuring the provision and protection of appropriate social infrastructure. The London Fire Brigade’s approach to their assets includes savings related to their improved handling of assets, which includes closing some fire stations. The original plan included proposals to close New Cross and Downham fire stations, although under the revised plan only Downham station was earmarked for closure. The Metropolitan Police Service has a number of objectives related to their assets, including the development of Front Counters and Contact Points, creating a more efficient estate and selling off the New Scotland Yard. Within Lewisham, Brockley police station has already closed and Sydenham is due to close. The London Ambulance Service has three bases in Lewisham, all of which are due to stay open. The Trust Special Administrator proposals had potentially significant changes for the estate of Lewisham Hospital, including an almost 60% reduction in its size. However, these proposals have not been progressed due to the successful legal challenge. Perception There was a widespread and significant response to the London Fire Brigade proposals to close Downham and New Cross fire station, and to the Secretary of State for Health’s decision to downgrade the A&E and maternity services at Lewisham Hospital. Lewisham Council submitted a response to the consultation
Recommended publications
  • Regeneration in Deptford, London
    Regeneration in Deptford, London September 2008 Produced by Dr. Gareth Potts BURA Director of Research, Policy and Best Practice Contact: 07792 817156 Table of Contents Planning and Regeneration Strategy ......................................................................................................................... 3 Early Community Regeneration .............................................................................................................................. 11 Renewal of the Pepys Estate .................................................................................................................................... 15 Riverside Schemes ...................................................................................................................................................... 18 Inland Development ................................................................................................................................................... 24 Deptford Town Centre Regeneration Programme ............................................................................................ 33 Some Novel Approaches to Regeneration ........................................................................................................... 36 Appendices .................................................................................................................................................................. 38 Planning and Regeneration Strategy The Planning Framework The key planning guidelines are set out in the
    [Show full text]
  • The London Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2017
    The London Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment 2017 Part of the London Plan evidence base COPYRIGHT Greater London Authority November 2017 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 Copies of this report are available from www.london.gov.uk 2017 LONDON STRATEGIC HOUSING LAND AVAILABILITY ASSESSMENT Contents Chapter Page 0 Executive summary 1 to 7 1 Introduction 8 to 11 2 Large site assessment – methodology 12 to 52 3 Identifying large sites & the site assessment process 53 to 58 4 Results: large sites – phases one to five, 2017 to 2041 59 to 82 5 Results: large sites – phases two and three, 2019 to 2028 83 to 115 6 Small sites 116 to 145 7 Non self-contained accommodation 146 to 158 8 Crossrail 2 growth scenario 159 to 165 9 Conclusion 166 to 186 10 Appendix A – additional large site capacity information 187 to 197 11 Appendix B – additional housing stock and small sites 198 to 202 information 12 Appendix C - Mayoral development corporation capacity 203 to 205 assigned to boroughs 13 Planning approvals sites 206 to 231 14 Allocations sites 232 to 253 Executive summary 2017 LONDON STRATEGIC HOUSING LAND AVAILABILITY ASSESSMENT Executive summary 0.1 The SHLAA shows that London has capacity for 649,350 homes during the 10 year period covered by the London Plan housing targets (from 2019/20 to 2028/29). This equates to an average annualised capacity of 64,935 homes a year.
    [Show full text]
  • CHINBROOK ACTION RESIDENTS TEAM Big Local Plan September 2017 2017-2019 (Plan Years 2 and 3)
    CHINBROOK ACTION RESIDENTS TEAM Big Local Plan September 2017 2017-2019 (Plan Years 2 and 3) 1 | P a g e CHINBROOK ACTION RESIDENTS TEAM BIG LOCAL PLAN 1. Introduction 2. Chinbrook Context 3. Partnership 4. Vision and Priority Areas o Priority 1 : Health & Well-being o Priority 2 : Parks & Green Spaces o Priority 3 : Education, Training & Employment o Priority 4 : Community & Belonging o Priority 5 : Routes out of Poverty o Priority 6 : Community Investment 5. Consulting the Community 6. Plan for Years 2 & 3 7. Appendices 2 | P a g e Introduction from our Vice Chairs “Welcome to Chinbrook Big Local, we call ourselves Chinbrook Action Residents Team, or ChART for short. Together we are working to make Chinbrook an even better place for people to live, work and play. We are pleased to introduce our second plan. We worked hard as a steering group to take on board the comments and view of local residents to forge our next set of priorities. There was a strong sense of the need for everybody to work together to tackle the harsh economic climate that is facing many people up and down the country which is why we have added a new priority, Routes out of Poverty. Over the last year I feel ChART has really started to make an impact in the area, doing what we intended which is galvanising local community solidarity based on what local people say they need, helping them to come together to do so. We have moved from people saying “ChART? What’s that” to “ChART, What are you up to?” and it was great to get so much positive feedback about our projects from the consultation exercise we undertook during the summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Surrey Canal – a Case Study of Urban Regeneration
    Surrey Canal – a case study of urban regeneration The Surrey Canal regeneration scheme aims to comprehensively transform a predominantly industrial area around, and including, Millwall football stadium in North West Lewisham (bordering the Borough of Southwark), South East London into a new place in the capital. The scheme will include: A new station Surrey Canal on the Overground Line New bus routes 2400 homes across five communities within the scheme 2000 new jobs An improved setting for Millwall FC New facilities for the Millwall Community Scheme An iconic local and regional indoor sports complex A 150-bed hotel with conferencing facilities A major new church to seat a 1200-strong congregation A creative industries quarter A health complex specialising in sports injury and community care Improved permeability including walking and cycling links A business incubation centre Creche and nursery An improved park at Bridgehouse Meadows. Tessa Gooding: http://freethinker85.wordpress.com/ Hall and Barratt (2012, 148 cited in Tallon: 2013, 8) summarise the concerns of contemporary urban regeneration as: Physical environment Quality of life Social welfare Economic prospects Governance. The theory is that improvements in each of these areas ‘combine to secure the upward trajectory of a locality in a long- term and sustainable manner’ (Tallon: 2013, 5). This report will analyse the Surrey Canal regeneration scheme in each of these five areas. However, this report will not be able to assess the long-term sustainability outcomes of this regeneration scheme because the development only received planning permission in 2012; is in the early stages of construction and is expected to take 15 years to complete.
    [Show full text]
  • 12179 Greenchainnature Reserve- 16 5 14 PROOF
    Visit 12 nature reserves along the Green Chain Walk Take a walk on the wild side The Wider Landscape This guide introduces you to Now it’s over to you. Whatever the Sensitive sites such as these cannot time of year you will find survive in isolation. The wider landscape some of the very best nature and something to delight you. Use the wildlife sites on the Green Chain. of the Green Chain - some 2,500 hectares checklist to tick off the sites you of open space in south east London (the have visited and anything that Each one has something special about it. All have been selected size of 3,400 football pitches!), provides inspired you on your visit! an important role in their survival. As because they are easy to get to by train or bus. As well as maps well as acting as a buffer to urban for each site we have also provided information that will make Crossness page 6 - 7 encroachment and the increasing your visit more interesting. demand for more housing, the Green Lesnes Abbey Woods page 8 - 9 Chain supports the mobility of wildlife so that alternative sources of food can be Take a walk found within the wider landscape. Oxleas Woods page 10 -11 Working together Maryon Wilson Park page 12 - 13 In the future our open spaces will need to be more resilient to threats such as on the wildside Sutcliffe Park page 14 - 15 climate change, floods, droughts and sea level rises. The vision of a connected and Grove Park page 16 - 17 robust living landscape can only be achieved by organisations working together.
    [Show full text]
  • Advertise Here Advertise Here
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 To Chalk To Kentish To Finsbury To South Hampstead Farm Town To Holloway Park To Stoke Newington To Clapton To Clapton To Swiss CS1 Cottage Camden London Road Fields Northchurch Kingsland Road Queensbridge Road Q2 CAMDEN Terrace Caledonian Q2 Camden Town Road To West Allitsen Road HACKNEY A Hampstead Ordnance Hill Camden Agar Lauriston Road A Street Grove Lofting Road Broadway Market High Street Danbury Road Downham Road Circus Road Gloucester Gate 7 8 V4.3 SEP 2017 Q2 HOXTON To Kilburn ST JOHN’S Regents Park ANGEL Hoxton Street WOODS Angel Sutherland Avenue Amwell Street CS1 Victoria Park Blomfield Kings Cross Frumpton Street Regents Great Portland Road Pitfield Street Randolph Road /Regents Canal Park Street Euston Kings Cross Hackney Avenue Crawford Street City Farm Gower St Pancras To Maida Hill International Warwick Street SHOREDITCH Grove Road To Stratford Avenue Q2 BETHNAL Tavistock Regent Bethnal Little Venice Goodge GREEN MARYLEBONE Street Square Square Green Road CLERKENWELL Kingsland Road Paddington Gardens Great MILE END Basin Marylebone Bath Eastern Clerkenwell Road Street Old Street Street BAYSWATER Weavers Field CS2 B Paddington B Smithfield Charterhouse Bishopsgate Market Bunhill Row Wilson Street Brick Lane Queen Mary Bayswater Sussex Gardens Street University CS3 Connaught Square Bloomsbury Drury Q Queensway Oxford Circus Lane WHITECHAPEL Street Q Barbican To Shepherd’s Moorgate Liverpool Street Bush Q11 Aldgate East Notting Hill Lancaster Gate Marble Bond Street Tottenham Holborn Chancery Lane Arch Court
    [Show full text]
  • Green Spirit -Glendale's Spring 2011 Newsletter.Pub
    Issue 5 The Previous 10-Year Partnership by Molly Hingston Summer 2011 Glendale’s partnership with the London Borough of Lewisham has attracted national recognition for putting parks and open spaces at the heart of local communities. A unique combination of proven green expertise, investment, innovation and accountability successfully met the challenge to revitalise Lewisham’s green spaces. The following highlights some of the achievements and successes of the previous 10-year partnership; 2000 In the year 2000, the partnership between the Borough of Lewisham and Glendale began by a unique private finance initiative investment scheme. Over a three-year period Lewisham received a £1.5m investment from Glendale to finance improvements to parks and green spaces. One of the projects included a £340,000 investment at Chinbrook Meadows to develop the sports pavilion, playground and cricket pitch. 2001 The following year, 2001, Lewisham was awarded the ‘London in Bloom’ award for the ‘Most improved Borough’. The first ever catering facility in the parks opened at Manor House Gardens. Investments were also made in other parks across the Borough; from footpaths to fencing, park signs to toilets and bridges ‘Pistachios in the Park ‘at Manor House Gardens to paddling pools. 2002 A section of the River Quaggy was returned to its natural state in 2002 as part of a £1.2m regeneration project of Chinbrook Meadows. The scheme was the culmination of an innovative partnership between Groundwork, London Borough of Lewisham, Environment Agency and Glendale. A bedding memorial was created in Deptford Park to celebrate the Queen’s Jubilee. 2003 2003 saw the first Lewisham Walking Festival and the first Farmers’ Market which was held in Manor House Gardens.
    [Show full text]
  • Open PDF 588KB
    House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Formal Minutes Session 2017–19 The Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Yvette Cooper MP (Chair, Labour, Normanton, Pontefract and Castleford) Rehman Chishti MP (Conservative, Gillingham and Rainham) Sir Christopher Chope MP (Conservative, Christchurch) Janet Daby MP (Labour, Lewisham East) Stephen Doughty MP (Labour (Co-op), Cardiff South and Penarth) Chris Green MP (Conservative, Bolton West) Kate Green MP (Labour, Stretford and Urmston) Tim Loughton MP (Conservative, East Worthing and Shoreham) Stuart C. McDonald MP (Scottish National Party, Cumbernauld, Kilsyth & Kirkintilloch East) Toby Perkins MP (Labour, Chesterfield) Douglas Ross MP (Conservative, Moray) The following Members were members of the Committee during the Session: Preet Kaur Gill MP (Labour (Co-op), Birmingham, Edgbaston) Sarah Jones MP (Labour, Croydon Central) Kirstene Hair MP (Conservative, Angus) Rt Hon Esther McVey MP (Conservative, Tatton) Alex Norris MP (Labour (Co-op), Nottingham North) Will Quince MP (Conservative, Colchester) Naz Shah MP (Labour, Bradford West) John Woodcock MP (Independent, Barrow and Furness) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/homeaffairscom.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Housing in the UK and US: Evolution, Issues and Prospects
    Social Housing in the UK and US: Evolution, Issues and Prospects Michael E. Stone, Ph.D. Atlantic Fellow in Public Policy Visiting Associate, Centre for Urban and Community Research, Goldsmiths College, University of London Professor of Community Planning and Public Policy University of Massachusetts Boston October 2003 Support and Disclaimer: This research was made possible through an Atlantic Fellowship in Public Policy, funded by the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, and administered by the British Council. Additional support has been provided by the Centre for Urban and Community Research, Goldsmiths College, University of London; and the John W. McCormack Institute for Public Affairs, University of Massachusetts Boston. The views expressed herein are not necessarily those of the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the British Council, Goldsmiths College, or the University of Massachusetts Boston. Acknowledgements: Community Activists: Malcolm Cadman, Bill Ellson, Steve Hurren, Jean Kysow, Jessica Leech, Shirley Mucklow, Pete Pope, Jess Steele Housing Professionals: Keith Anderson, John Bader, Alan Bonney, Lorraine Campbell, Simon Cribbens, Emyr Evans, Barbara Gray, Pat Hayes, Andy Kennedy, Colm McCaughley, David Orr, Steve Palmer, Emma Peters, Roland Smithies, Louise Spires, Sarah Thurman Goldsmiths College CUCR Staff: Les Back, Ben Gidley, Paul Halliday, Roger Hewitt, Carole Keegan, Michael Keith, Azra Khan, Marjorie Mayo, Neil Spicer, Chenli Vautier, Bridget Ward © Copyright, 2003, Michael E. Stone. All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Lewisham's Big Green
    Campaigning and Local Government Food Project / Organics / Ethical / Fair Trade / Shops and Suppliers / Farmers Markets (cont) No. Organisation Main Contact Telephone E-mail No. Organisation Main Contact Telephone E-mail LEWISHAM’S 1 Lewisham Council 8314 2559 [email protected] 131 Well Being Melvyn Stevens 8659 2003 Event / Art Project 132 Hilly Fields Farmers’ Market Sophie Elder 8291 1124 [email protected] 133 Manor House Gdns. Farmers’ Market Sophie Elder 8291 1124 [email protected] 2 Lewisham Peoples Day Ann Grundy 8297 8521 [email protected] 134 Five a Day Joan Brooks 8692 7777 [email protected] Grove St. 3 Brockley Society Summer Fair Trottie Kirwen 8691 7234 [email protected] Composting Project 61 Community Garden / City Farm / Allotment 135 Glendale Green Waste Recycling Angus Lindsay 01772627111 [email protected] 4 Lewisham Allotments Chris Foraud 8314 2277 [email protected] 5 Ballamore See no.4 Eco-Architecture / Built Environment 6 Barmeston See no.4 136 Lewisham Planning Department Pete Smith 8314 9409 [email protected] A 78 40 2 7 Blackhorse See no.4 137 Green Register Pete Smith/Paul Liptrot 7820 3159 www.greenregister.org BIG 00 93 8 Blythe Hill See no.4 138 University Hospital Lewisham Shaun Swaby 8333 3288 [email protected] 95 112 213 Pepys 9 Broadmead See no.4 139 Meadows Estate, Bromley Rd, Catford Planning Officers [email protected] Park 10 Castillon See no.4 140 Creekside Centre Chris Gittner 8921 8764 [email protected] 55 11 Chinbrook Meadows See no.4 141 The Laban Centre Lorraine Fisher 8691 8600 l.fi[email protected] Deptford 212 124 12 Clarendon See no.4 142 CUE Building - Horniman Museum Lucy-Anne Bishop 8699 1872 [email protected] Park 7 13 Dacre park See no.4 143 Nubia Way Self Build Administrator 8692 5258 [email protected] 14 Deloraine See no.4 144 Chinbrook Ark Self Build www.segalselfbuild.co.uk/projects/chinbrookmeadows.html 87 42 134 Surrey Canal Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • Surrey Canal Triangle in the London Borough of Lewisham Planning Application No
    planning report PDU/2615/01 23 March 2011 Surrey Canal Triangle in the London Borough of Lewisham planning application no. DC/11/76357/X Strategic planning application stage 1 referral (new powers) Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended); Greater London Authority Acts 1999 and 2007; Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008 The proposal The applicant seeks outline planning permission for a mixed-use development, retaining the existing Millwall FC stadium (‘The New Den’) and incorporating minor extensions, and the development of up to 250,000 sq.m of new building floorspace. This would incorporate: A maximum of 2,500 flats. Sporting/leisure uses of up to 15,800 sq.m. A hotel of up to 15,000 sq.m (150 rooms). Employment space of up to 15,000 sq.m. Community use floorspace (intended to act as a multi-faith community centre) of up to 10,000 sq.m, and a crèche up to 400 sq.m. Up to 3,600 sq.m retail uses intended for neighbourhood shopping Up to 3,500 sq.m. of cafe/restaurant uses and 300 sq.m. of hot food takeaway floorspace. The applicant The applicant is Renewal New Bermondsey Two, and the masterplanning architect is Studio Egret West. Strategic issues This will be a mixed-use, sport and residential-led development that promises to deliver regeneration benefits to this part of London, while helping to deliver Mayoral policies on sport and health. There are concerns regarding the level of development proposed, particularly its density as the site currently has poor accessibility, although the delivery of Surrey Canal Road Overground Station and other transport works would lead to accessibility improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex I Introduction to Grove Park
    RINGFIGU Annex I Introduction to Grove Park Grove Park Neighbourhoo d Plan 2018-2033 JUNE 2019 | SUBMISSION DRAFT © Grove Park Neighbourhood Forum Date Published June 2019 –Submission version The Grove Park Neighbourhood Plan (Submission version) has been prepared with the help of Mapping Futures with Changing Cities, and with contributions from associate colleagues James Hulme and Imogen Humphris. It is, however, a collective effort, involving much input and text from the residents themselves. All maps are reproduced from Ordnance Survey mapping with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Mapping Futures Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to E [email protected] prosecution or civil proceedings. Lewisham Council Licence No: LA075221 M +44 (0) 7834915165 applies. All other data is open source from online locations, referenced as footnotes throughout the documents. W https://mappingfutures.org/ T @MappingFutures For more information contact: Changing Cities Grove Park Neighbourhood Forum E [email protected] E [email protected] M +44 (0) 7889 392 786 W http://www.groveparkneighbourhoodforum.com/ W http://changingcities.co.uk/ T https://twitter.com/groveparknforum Page 2 of 49 Page 3 of 49 Acronyms & Abbreviations Please note, these acronyms are found throughout all the documents, summarised here in one place ACV Asset of Community Value (as defined by the Localism Act) AGM Annual General Meeting ASLC Areas of Special Local Character
    [Show full text]