The Role of Urban Agriculture for Sustainable and Resilient Cities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Role of Urban Agriculture for Sustainable and Resilient Cities THE ROLE OF URBAN AGRICULTURE FOR SUSTAINABLE AND RESILIENT CITIES A Dissertation Submitted by Thomas Alexander Masyk To the Faculty of Spatial Planning TU Dortmund University, Germany In Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Engineering (Dr.- Ing.) 2021 - 2 - Doctoral Committee Supervisor/Examiner: Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dietwald Gruehn Examiner: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Sophie Schramm Chairman of the Examination Committee: Univ.-Prof. Dr. rer. nat. habil. Nguyen Xuan Thinh Declaration I hereby declare that this doctoral dissertation is the result of an independent investigation and it has been generated by me as the result of my own research. Where it is indebted to the work of others, acknowledgements have duly been made. Thomas Alexander Masyk Augsburg, 24.03.2021 - 3 - ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A scholarly paper is never the work of a single person. Therefore, I want to thank everyone who made it possible for me to write this thesis. My deepest thanks go to Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dietwald Gruehn for accepting me as a Ph.D. candidate. I want to thank him for his encouragement, patience, advices and constructive criticism on my thoughts and drafts. I also want to thank Univ.-Prof. Dr. Sophie Schramm for her thoughts and ideas that improved my thesis greatly and gave it its finishing touch. My greatest thanks and gratitude go to both my parents Dr. Eva-Maria Masyk and Dr. Taras Masyk as well as to my wife Tanja Masyk. Without their support, encouragement and love, I would not be where I am right now and would never have been able to finish this thesis. I am proud to have such an amazing family! Also, I want to thank all experts and interview partners for their precious time taken for meeting me in person, answering my questions and for providing me with additional information and interesting insights. This especially includes Dr. Ashraf Omran who invited me to his impressive hydroponics project in Dubai, the academic staff of the Masdar Institute of Science and Technology who showed me around in Masdar and told me about their research activities, Lionel Wong who introduced me to his vertical farming concept in Singapore, Dr. Philipp Stierand from Speiseräume.de who discussed with me municipal nutrition policies and urban food planning, Volkmar Keuter from Fraunhofer inFARMING who informed me about the latest sustainable technologies and all the activists of the Urban Agriculture Movement who let me experience existing urban garden projects. - 4 - ABSTRACT The topic of the study is to determine the role of urban agriculture for the sustainability and resilience of cities. The investigation of its forms, technologies and implementation options shows to what extent urban agriculture is suitable for improving urban sustainability and resilience. This question is explored against the background of global climate change, the rapidly growing world population, progressive urbanization with the associated increasing degradation of the ecosystem, and threats to food security. The aim of the research is to lay the foundation for climate-adapted city and land planning concepts with new findings on the mitigation and adaptation potential of urban agricultural systems. Based on a comprehensive definition of sustainability, resilience, and vulnerability, and using the Seed Scale and Emergence approach, the basic conditions for a successful development of urban farming initiatives and concepts are examined. A review of modern soilless cultivation methods and a SWOT analysis of the vertical farming concept provide insights into possible uses, sustainable advantages and properties that can strengthen urban resilience. In the empirical part of the study, semi-structured interviews with city authorities, scientists and urban activists show the current embedding of urban agriculture into the green infrastructure of cities based on the goals of the German sustainability strategy, of Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 programs. The results of an online survey with 120 participants show a broad acceptance of the different forms of urban agriculture and their high importance as a tool to mitigate and adapt to climate change. The perceived multiple benefits (ecological, economic, and social) of urban agriculture and its potential to improve urban sustainability and resilience are good reasons for strengthening its integration into current and future urban development plans. - 5 - Case studies on the function of urban agriculture according to Singapore’s Climate Action Plan and of the Emirati Food Security Strategy demonstrate how urban agriculture can contribute to securing food supplies under difficult and completely different conditions as in Germany. An overview of the current state of research shows the support of the results of this study by leading scientists and various research projects which advocate a paradigm shift towards a green infrastructure. Highly productive, environmentally friendly technologies such as hydroponics, aquaponics, and roof-top and vertical farming cannot only significantly improve urban food security, but also have numerous advantages for the ecological, economic and social sustainability and resilience of a city. Still, there is a great need for research in relation to quality and certification processes for the practical integration of urban agriculture into buildings and for analyses of the full economic life-cycle of vertical farming projects. These are an essential requirement for further establishing and up-scaling this extraordinary agricultural production method, which has the potential to revolutionize the urban food system of the future. - 6 - TABLE OF CONTENT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................. 3 ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................ 4 TABLE OF CONTENT ....................................................................................... 6 LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................ 10 LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................... 13 LIST OF IMAGES ............................................................................................ 15 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................. 17 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 20 1.1 Urbanization .......................................................................................... 20 1.2 Deterioration of the Ecosystem ........................................................... 22 1.3 Food Security ........................................................................................ 26 1.4 International Agreements ..................................................................... 28 2.0 URBAN CHALLENGES ............................................................................. 32 2.1 Climate Change ..................................................................................... 32 2.2 Environmental Problems ...................................................................... 35 2.3 Urban Food Security............................................................................. 38 2.3.1 Definition .......................................................................................... 38 2.3.2 Resilient Urban Food System ........................................................... 39 2.3.3 Urban Food Security Strategy .......................................................... 41 3.0 AIM OF THE STUDY.................................................................................. 46 3.1 Creating New Awareness ..................................................................... 46 3.2 Filling Research Gaps .......................................................................... 49 4.0 THEORETICAL FOUNDATION ................................................................. 51 4.1 Definitions of Terms ............................................................................. 51 4.1.1 Urban agriculture .............................................................................. 51 4.1.2 Sustainability .................................................................................... 55 4.1.3 Resilience ......................................................................................... 58 4.1.4 Vulnerability ...................................................................................... 62 4.2 Mitigation and Adaptation .................................................................... 69 - 7 - 4.3 Seed-Scale and Emergence ................................................................. 71 5.0 RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND LIMITATIONS ......................................... 78 6.0 STRUCTURE AND RESEARCH DESIGN ................................................. 81 7.0 METHODS AND DATA ACQUISITION ..................................................... 84 7.1 Triangulation of Research Methods .................................................... 84 7.2 Literature Review .................................................................................. 86 7.3 SWOT Analysis and Case Studies....................................................... 87 7.3.1 SWOT Analysis ................................................................................ 87 7.3.2 Selecting Singapore and the UAE .................................................... 89 7.4 On-Site
Recommended publications
  • Francesco Orsini Marielle Dubbeling Henk De Zeeuw Giorgio Gianquinto Editors Rooftop Urban Agriculture
    Urban Agriculture Francesco Orsini Marielle Dubbeling Henk de Zeeuw Giorgio Gianquinto Editors Rooftop Urban Agriculture 123 Urban Agriculture Series editors Christine Aubry, AgroParisTech, INRA UMR SADAPT, Paris, France Éric Duchemin, Université du Québec à Montréal Institut des Science de Environment, Montreal, Québec, Canada Joe Nasr, Centre for Studies in Food Security, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada The Urban Agriculture Book Series at Springer is for researchers, professionals, policy-makers and practitioners working on agriculture in and near urban areas. Urban agriculture (UA) can serve as a multifunctional resource for resilient food systems and socio-culturally, economically and ecologically sustainable cities. For the Book Series Editors, the main objective of this series is to mobilize and enhance capacities to share UA experiences and research results, compare methodologies and tools, identify technological obstacles, and adapt solutions. By diffusing this knowledge, the aim is to contribute to building the capacity of policy-­ makers, professionals and practitioners in governments, international agencies, civil society, the private sector as well as academia, to effectively incorporate UA in their field of interests. It is also to constitute a global research community to debate the lessons from UA initiatives, to compare approaches, and to supply tools for aiding in the conception and evaluation of various strategies of UA development. The concerned scientific field of this series is large because UA combines agricultural issues with those related to city management and development. Thus this interdisciplinary Book Series brings together environmental sciences, agronomy, urban and regional planning, architecture, landscape design, economics, social sciences, soil sciences, public health and nutrition, recognizing UA’s contribution to meeting society’s basic needs, feeding people, structuring the cities while shaping their development.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University the Graduate School College Of
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Agricultural Sciences GREENTOWERS: PRODUCTION AND FINANCIAL ANALYSES OF URBAN AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS A Thesis in Horticulture by Jonathan Gumble 2015 Jonathan Gumble Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science August 2015 The thesis of Jonathan Gumble was reviewed and approved* by the following: Robert D. Berghage Associate Professor of Horticulture Thesis Co-Advisor Dan T. Stearns J. Franklin Styer Professor Thesis Co-Advisor Mark A. Gagnon Harbaugh Entrpreneurship Scholar & Entrepreneur Coordinator Andrew Lau Associate Professor of Engineering Rich Marini Professor of Horticulture Head of the Department of Horticulture *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School ii Abstract By the year 2050, the population of planet Earth is expected to reach over nine billion people. In the next 35 years, we will have the task of supporting an additional two billion lives on a planet that is already struggling to provide a stable and acceptable food supply as well as an effective means of food distribution. Estimates show that of the seven billion people living on planet Earth, 870 million suffer from hunger. The fight against world hunger is a complex, challenging, and multi-faceted issue that can only be fought through innovative solutions that address the multiple aspects comprising it. One of these aspects is simply limited access to food in urban neighborhoods and rural towns which are referred to as “food deserts”. These are prevalent throughout the United States and have resulted in food-insecure households. Solutions to limited access do exist today in the form of innovative growing on developed land.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Yield Comparison
    2/3/2021 Feb 27, 2018 Controlled Environment Plant Physiology & Technology Lab Hydroponics & (The Kubota Lab) Controlled Environment Agriculture (CEA) http://extension.psu.edu/publications/ul207 Our Mission Dr. Chieri Kubota To serve for science‐based technology development in the area of controlled Horticulture and Crop Science environment agriculture (CEA). The Ohio State University To translate scientific understanding and discoveries into innovative applications. 12 Controlled Environment Agriculture Controlled Environment Agriculture • High yield • High quality • Minimum resource use (water, pesticide, and fertilizer) • Year‐round production (Year‐ round employment) • Ergonomic improvement • Various technology levels – Low tech (high tunnels, soil) – High tech (computer control, automation, soilless/hydroponics) 34 Annual yield comparison • Tomato – Florida open‐field fresh tomato average = 3.2 kg/m2 (950 million pounds out of 33000 harvested acres in 2015) (0.7 lb/ft2) – Greenhouse benchmark yield = 50‐60 kg/m2 (various sources) (10‐12 lb/ft2) – Greenhouse record yield = 100 kg/m2 (Village Farms, USA/Canada) (20 lb/ft2) Photo by Merle Jensen 56 1 2/3/2021 Water use comparison Recirculation of WUE –Water Use Efficiency (kg/m3) nutrient solution in tomato, 3 • California open‐field tomato 10‐12 kg/m with cucumber, and flood irrigation; 19‐25 kg/m3 with drip pepper crops irrigation (San Joaquin Valley data) (high‐wire crops) • Greenhouse tomato 30‐66 kg/m3 with recirculated irrigation system (reported in the Netherlands and Spain).
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Choice and Food Policy. a Literature Review
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270285136 Consumer Choice and Food Policy. A Literature Review Article in Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology · January 2011 CITATIONS READS 18 5,472 4 authors: Alexandra Jurcoane Mihaela Draghici University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest 11 PUBLICATIONS 44 CITATIONS 46 PUBLICATIONS 86 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Mona Elena Popa Petru Niculiţă University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest 41 PUBLICATIONS 221 CITATIONS 250 PUBLICATIONS 893 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: IMPROVING FOOD SAFETY THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ACTIVE AND BIODEGRADABLE FOOD PACKAGING SYSTEMS (ACTIBIOSAFE) View project ActiBioSafe View project All content following this page was uploaded by Mona Elena Popa on 02 January 2015. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology 12, No 2, 708–717 (2011) Environmental management CONSUMER CHOICE AND FOOD POLICY. A LITERATURE REVIEW A. POpaa, M. DRAGHICIb, M. POpab*, P. Niculitab aNewcastle University, UK E-mail: [email protected] bFaculty of Biotechnology, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Bucharest, Romania E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. This paper is a product of a research national project that is examining the food consumer behaviour by analysing the drivers for organic food consumption in Romania in order to develop marketing strategies useful to key players in the organic food market. The analysis of the existing literature review in this paper reveals a changing food culture that reflects today lifestyles and the society interests on environment and health related issues in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Koi Aquaculture in Singapore from 1965 to the Present : Translating Translocated Scientific Knowledge from Japan Into Biosecurity
    This document is downloaded from DR‑NTU (https://dr.ntu.edu.sg) Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. The history of Koi aquaculture in Singapore from 1965 to the present : translating translocated scientific knowledge from Japan into biosecurity Tan, Delfinn Sweimay 2018 Tan, D. S. (2018). The history of Koi aquaculture in Singapore from 1965 to the present : translating translocated scientific knowledge from Japan into biosecurity. Doctoral thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/87914 https://doi.org/10.32657/10220/45577 Downloaded on 30 Sep 2021 22:27:32 SGT The History of Koi Aquaculture in Singapore from 1965 to the Present: Translating Translocated Scientific Knowledge from Japan into Biosecurity Tan Delfinn Sweimay Interdisciplinary Graduate School NEWRI - Advanced Environmental Biotechnology Centre A thesis submitted to the Nanyang Technological University in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2018 Acknowledgements First I would like to thank my supervisor, Prof Lisa Onaga, for giving me the opportunity to pursue this project under her supervision. This would never have been possible if it were not for her faith in me, her mentorship, and her patience, as well as her staunch belief in the possibilities of this project even as my own faith and strength faltered. She was the one who took a chance on me, even though I had no previous experience in this subject or field. To my TAC members, Prof Saidul Islam and Prof Ali Miserez, thank you for your support. I would also like to thank Professor Akihisa Setoguchi from Kyoto University, Japan, who hosted me during my research in Japan and helped mentor me, introduced me to people and provided support during my time in Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • Scaling Commercial Urban Agriculture in Singapore
    www.rsis.edu.sg/nts NTS REPORT 2018 SCALING COMMERCIAL URBAN AGRICULTURE IN SINGAPORE: AN ASSESSMENT OF THE VIABILITY OF LEAFY VEGETABLE PRODUCTION USING PLANT FACTORIES WITH ARTIFICIAL LIGHTING IN A 2017 LAND TENDER (FIRST TRANCHE) NTS Report No. 7 | February 2018 1 22 3 Jose Ma. Luis Montesclaros , Stella Liu and Paul P.S. Teng ______________________ 1 Associate Research Fellow with the NTS Centre. 2 Visiting US Fulbright Research Fellow with the NTS Centre. 3 Adjunct Senior Fellow with the NTS Centre. Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre) S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Nanyang Technological University, Block S4, Level B4, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798 Tel: +65 6790 6982 Fax: +65 6793 2991 [email protected] Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 I. Background .............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Singapore’s Urban Food Security .............................................................................................................................. 4 Recent Strategies in Improving Singapore’s Food Security through Local Food Production .................................... 5 II. Objective of the Study ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vision for an Organic Food and Farming Research Agenda to 2025
    Technology Platform ‘Organics’ Vision for an Organic Food and Farming Research Agenda to 2025 Organic Knowledge for the Future Vision for an Organic Food and Farming Research Agenda to 2025 and Farming Vision for an Organic Food Supporters Organisations to become members of the Technology Platform ‚Organics’: BirdLife, www.birdlife.org Countdown 2010, www.countdown2010.net Ecologica International Association, www.ecologica.mobi EOCC EOCC, European Organic Certifiers Council Eurocoop, www.eurocoop.org Eurogroup for Animals, www.eurogroupforanimals.org Euromontana, www.euromontana.org European Council of Young Farmers, www.ceja.org European Environmental Bureau, www.eeb.org European Federation of Food, Agriculture and Tourism Trade Unions, www.effat.org FoEE, Friends of the Earth Europe, www.foeeurope.org FSC, Fondation Sciences Citoyennes, http://sciencescito- yennes.org 1 Vision for an Organic Food and Farming Research Agenda to 2025 GENET European NGO Network on Genetic Engineering, www.genet-info.org IFOAM EU Group, International Federation of Organic Agri- culture Movements, www.ifoam-eu.org ISOFAR, International Society of Organic Agriculture Re- search, www.isofar.org Schweisfurth-Stiftung, www.schweisfurth.de Members of the European Parliament in support of the Research Vision: Bernadette Bourzai, Vice Chairperson of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development Monica Frassoni, Member of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Roberto Musacchio, Vice Chairperson of the Temporary Committee on Climate
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Preference Towards Organic Products B
    www.ijcrt.org © 2018 IJCRT | Volume 6, Issue 2 April 2018 | ISSN: 2320-2882 Consumer Preference towards Organic products B. Karthikeyan, Assistant Professor Department of Commerce KG College of Arts and Science ABSTRACT In recent days organic products grasp many pupils. Thus, a consumer-oriented approach to understanding organic agriculture and organic products is important not only in its own right, but also in terms of shifting market dynamics. Organic products are obtained by processes friendly to the environment “Green World”, Pupils throughout the world receiving awareness by any form but still 12% don’t know and not sure, silent lack of knowledge is there about organic products. The latest innovation on organic products gives more importance among the pupil by the marketers. Consumer‘s preference is highly turned towards the organic products increasing day by day. Consumers give their important to their safety, cheapest and chemical free, they have higher utility in organic products. INTRODUCTION Current scenario consumer’s interest are grasped on organically products is increasing throughout the world. Organic give importance to food safety and human health, animal welfare considerations and concern about the environment. To classify and identify several categories of organic consumers are namely (1) environmentalists, (2) food fearful, (3) healthy wishers, (4) humanists and (5) wellbeing enthusiasts. The interest in organic agriculture and organic merchandise has prompted several personals to engaged both directly and indirectly to study on the comparing aspects of organic and non-organic products. The future of organic agriculture will depend, to a large extent, on consumer demand. As a result, a consumer-oriented approach is used to understand the organic agriculture and organic products are important not only in its own right, but also in terms of shifting market dynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • AGRICULTURAL STATE: FOOD SOVEREIGNTY in SINGAPORE Hyejin Kim
    CONTENDING VISIONS OF LOCAL AGRICULTURE IN A NON-AGRICULTURAL STATE: FOOD SOVEREIGNTY IN SINGAPORE Hyejin Kim What do calls for food sovereignty look like in a context with little agriculture and limited opportunities for resistance? Despite the small number of produc- ers, the lack of overt resistance, and the absence of ties to the global food sov- ereignty movement, food activists in Singapore articulate a quiet but radical critique of how the state manages globalization. This critique contains ele- ments of a food sovereignty movement in Singapore. This movement faces two sets of challenges. First, the state's control over resources allows for main- stream visions of agriculture to gain greater support and places food sove- reignty activists at the mercy of government. Second, commercial pressures raise obstacles to making farming an attractive vocation or hobby for Singapo- reans. This example provides a window onto subtle battles over the manage- ment of a society's entanglement in global production networks. Keywords: Southeast Asia, food sovereignty, local agriculture, agricultural technology, global food industry. Introduction Movements to assert local control over food production have emerged across the globe, in wealthy consumer centers and in poorer agricultural regions (Andree et al. 2014; Edelman 2014; McMichael 2014). Diverse motivations drive these movements, from fears of food price fluctuations to concerns about food safety and the environmental im- pact of production processes. Whatever the motivation, movements for ‘food sovereign- ty’ or ‘food democracy’ are responses to global agri-food networks that shift power away from communities and public authority and toward powerful corporate actors (Di Dio 2012; Lang and Heasman 2004; Menser 2014; Patel 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Certification for Indoor Urban and Vertical Farms a Sustainable Approach to Addressing Growth in Vertical Farming
    SUSTAINABILITY CERTIFICATION FOR INDOOR URBAN AND VERTICAL FARMS A SUSTAINABLE APPROACH TO ADDRESSING GROWTH IN VERTICAL FARMING CLIENT Association for Vertical Farming TEAM Jasim Almeer, Tracy Baldwin, Michelle Bostwick, Maya Ezzeddine, Glen Halperin, Anna Harutyunyan, Adam Levinson, Katharine Macdonald, Kiley Miller, Shawn Peterson, Derrick Sullivan, Donata Tavoraite, Katherine Vera and Mingjie Yuan ADVISOR Susanne DesRoches Association for Vertical Farming | Columbia University SPS | Earth Institute Association for Vertical Farming | Columbia University SPS | Earth Institute 1 The report was developed by students of the Masters of Science in Sustainability Management Fall 2015 Capstone Workshop at the Columbia University School for Professional Studies in association with the Earth Institute. It was made possible by contributions from Jasim Almeer, Tracy Baldwin, Michelle Bostwick, Maya Ezzeddine, Glen Halperin, Anna Harutyunyan, Adam Levinson, Katharine Macdonald, Kiley Miller, Shawn Peterson, Derrick Sullivan, Donata Tavoraite, Katherine Vera and Mingjie Yuan, and with guidance from Susanne DesRoches. Association for Vertical Farming | Columbia University SPS | Earth Institute 2 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 INTRODUCTION: THE NEED FOR URBAN AND VERTICAL FARMING 10 Challenges to Traditional Agriculture & Food Supply 10 Benefits of Urban and Vertical Farming 11 Urban and Vertical Farming Challenges 12 The Need for Standards and Sustainability Certification 13 Client Background and Objectives 14 New York City and Urban and Vertical Farming
    [Show full text]
  • Apr–Jun 2021 (PDF)
    Vol. 17 Issue 01 APR–JUN 2021 10 / A Banquet of Malayan Fruits 16 / Nature Conservation – A History 22 / A Beastly Business 38 / The Nature of Poetry 44 / Finding Magic Everywhere 50 / Plantation Agriculture The Nature Issue Deforestation’s deadly impact in early Singapore p. 56 Our cultural beliefs influence how we view the natural environment as well as our understanding Director’s and attitudes towards animals and plants. These views and perceptions impact our relationship with the natural world. Note Some people see nature as wild and chaotic while others view nature as orderly, acting according to natural “laws”. There are those who perceive nature as an economic resource to be exploited for profit or for human enjoyment, yet there are also many who strongly believe that nature should be left untouched to flourish in its natural state. This issue of BiblioAsia looks at how human activities over the past 200 years have affected and transformed our physical environment, and how we are still living with the consequences today. This special edition accompanies an exciting new exhibition launched by the National Library – “Human x Nature” – at the Gallery on Level 10 of the National Library Building on Victoria Street. Do visit the exhibition, which will run until September this year. Georgina Wong, one of the curators of the show, opens this issue by exploring the relationship between European naturalists and the local community as plants and animals new to the West were uncovered. Not unexpectedly, indigenous input was often played down, dismissed, or exoticised. Farish Noor examines this phenomenon by taking a hard look at Walter Skeat’s book Malay Magic.
    [Show full text]
  • Scaling up Commercial Urban Agriculture to Meet Food Demand in Singapore
    www.rsis.edu.sg/nts NTS REPORT 2018 SCALING UP COMMERCIAL URBAN AGRICULTURE TO MEET FOOD DEMAND IN SINGAPORE: AN ASSESSMENT OF THE VIABILITY OF LEAFY VEGETABLE PRODUCTION USING PLANT FACTORIES WITH ARTIFICIAL LIGHTING IN A 2017 LAND TENDER (FIRST TRANCHE) NTS Report No. 7 | February 2018 1 22 3 Jose Ma. Luis Montesclaros , Stella Liu and Paul P.S. Teng ______________________ 1 Associate Research Fellow with the NTS Centre. 2 Visiting US Fulbright Research Fellow with the NTS Centre. 3 Adjunct Senior Fellow with the NTS Centre. Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies (NTS Centre) S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Nanyang Technological University, Block S4, Level B4, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798 Tel: +65 6790 6982 Fax: +65 6793 2991 [email protected] Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 I. Background .............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Singapore’s Urban Food Security .............................................................................................................................. 4 Recent Strategies in Improving Singapore’s Food Security through Local Food Production .................................... 5 II. Objective of the Study ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]