DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Election Results 2005

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Local Election Results 5th May 2005 Andrew Teale Version 0.37.38 December 27, 2007 2 LOCAL ELECTION RESULTS 2005 Typeset by LATEX Compilation and design © Andrew Teale, 2007. The author grants permission to copy and distribute this work in any medium, provided this notice is preserved. This file (in several formats) is available for download from http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/ Please advise the author of any corrections which need to be made by email: [email protected] Contents Introduction and Abbreviations5 I County Councils7 1 Bedfordshire8 2 Buckinghamshire 12 3 Cambridgeshire 16 4 Cheshire 21 5 Cornwall 25 6 Cumbria 30 7 Derbyshire 35 8 Devon 40 9 Dorset 45 10 Durham 49 11 East Sussex 54 12 Essex 58 13 Gloucestershire 64 14 Hampshire 69 15 Hertfordshire 75 16 Kent 81 17 Lancashire 88 18 Leicestershire 94 3 4 LOCAL ELECTION RESULTS 2005 19 Lincolnshire 98 20 Norfolk 103 21 North Yorkshire 109 22 Northamptonshire 114 23 Northumberland 119 24 Nottinghamshire 124 25 Oxfordshire 129 26 Shropshire 134 27 Somerset 138 28 Staffordshire 142 29 Suffolk 147 30 Surrey 152 31 Warwickshire 159 32 West Sussex 163 33 Wiltshire 168 34 Worcestershire 172 II Unitary Councils 177 35 North Eastern Unitaries 178 35.1 Stockton-on-Tees........................... 178 36 South Eastern Unitaries 181 36.1 Isle of Wight............................. 181 37 South Western Unitaries 184 37.1 Bristol................................. 184 Index 186 Introduction and Abbreviations Elections were held on 5th May 2005 to all county councils in England and three unitary authorities in England. As had happened at the two previous county council elections in 1997 and 2001, a general election was held on the same day. The results of the general election are available from many sources and are not covered here. The voting system used for all elections covered here was first-past-the-post, with multi-member FPTP being used where more than one seat was up for election. New boundaries were introduced in many counties, with in many counties multi-member divisions introduced for the first time — previously every county had used single-member divisions. While most divisions remain single-member, there are now a significant number of two-member divisions and three divisions electing three members (Penzance in Cornwall, Hucknall in Nottinghamshire and Bicester in Oxfordshire). Elections to the county councils are covered in Part I. The three unitary authorities which held elections were Bristol, the Isle of Wight, and Stockton-on-Tees. The Isle of Wight Council has the status of a county council and has 48 single-member divisions. One-third of Bristol City Council was up for election, with one councillor up for election in two- thirds of the wards, the remaining wards not holding an election this year. The election in Stockton-on-Tees was hastily arranged in order to introduce new ward boundaries, which could not be agreed in time for the scheduled election in May 2003; Stockton-on-Tees will revert to its normal four-year cycle from May 2007. Elections to these bodies are covered in Part II. Finally, at the back you will find an Index of Wards. Where a candidate in an election dies, the election in that ward or division is cancelled and rearranged for a later date. This happened in the following wards or divisions at this election: • Kinver, Staffordshire • Town Close, Norfolk and also in the general election in the Staffordshire South constituency. Here is a list of abbreviations used in this book for major parties and selected other parties which fought several councils. This list is not exhaustive; parties which put up only a few candidates will generally have their abbreviation listed at the head of the entry for the relevant council. Please note that the “Lab” label 5 6 LOCAL ELECTION RESULTS 2005 includes candidates who were jointly sponsored by the Labour and Co-operative Parties. BNP - British National Party Loony - Monster Raving Loony Party C - Conservative Party PC - Plaid Cymru Grn - Green Party Respect - Respect, the Unity Coalition Ind - Independent Soc All - Socialist Alliance Lab - Labour Party Soc Lab - Socialist Labour Party LD - Liberal Democrat UKIP - UK Independence Party Lib - Liberal Party I would like to close this section by thanking all those who have supplied me with results, and particularly those dozens of council webpages without which this work would not have been possible. Part I County Councils 7 Chapter 1 Bedfordshire New division boundaries came into force at this election. Bedford BBI = Better Bedford Independent Brickhill Eastcotts Peter Hand C 2,025 Susan Gaszczak LD 1,356 Charles Royden LD 1,895 Richard Payne C 1,270 Brian Anderson Lab 729 Pauline Curl Lab 557 Mary Fogg BBI 108 Bromham Roger Gwynne Jones C 2,067 Yanina Jones Lab 716 Goldington Stelios Mores LD 696 Eileen Whitmore Ind 374 Sylvia Gillard LD 1,545 Elizabeth Grugeon Lab 1,108 Alan Casan C 825 Cauldwell Brian Endersby BBI 326 Bob Elford Lab 1,876 Kitty Stacey C 711 Andrew Gerard LD 569 Harpur Clapham and Oakley Colleen Atkins Lab 1,435 Brian Dillingham C 947 Jane Walker C 2,282 John Ryan LD 530 Terence Carroll Lab 1,190 Stuart Channon BBI 196 Conrad Longmore LD 874 Jennifer Foley Grn 183 De Parys Tarsem Paul C 1,101 Harrold Lynda Aylett-Green LD 1,005 Margaret Davey BBI 684 Phyllis Gershon C 2,641 James Valentine Lab 592 Nicholas Charsley LD 1,367 Mark Steinhardt Grn 175 Stephen Poole Lab 931 8 CHAPTER 1. BEDFORDSHIRE 9 Kempston (2) North East Bedfordshire Kay Burley Lab 3,724 Thomas Wootton C 2,657 Ray Oliver Lab 3,571 Paul Stekelis LD 788 Mark Smith C 2,479 Philip Otubanjo Lab 589 Atul Sikand C 1,922 Mark Powell Grn 350 Timothy Hill LD 1,409 Joan Slater LD 1,297 Putnoe Marlies Branston BBI 802 Christopher Davies Grn 529 Rosemary Bootiman LD 1,989 Ralph Hall C 1,647 Mohammad Yasin Lab 715 Kempston Rural Mark Adkin UKIP 315 David Reedman C 1,408 David Gallagher LD 633 Queens Park Ben Foley Grn 275 Gordon Colling Lab 1,536 Roger Rigby C 823 Neal Bath LD 634 Kingsbrook Michael Bonito BBI 585 David Grugeon Lab 1,460 Paul Wheatley Grn 131 Dave Hodgson LD 1,441 Barbara Purbrick C 676 Wilshamstead Lynne Faulkner C 976 Newnham Anthony Hare Ind 751 Malcolm Whiteman LD 745 John Mingay C 1,241 June McDonald Lab 1,070 Anita Gerard LD 947 Wootton Edward Davey BBI 825 Gordon Willey LD 1,613 Saul Keyworth Grn 212 John Tait C 1,097 Mid Bedfordshire Ampthill Flitwick West Gary Summerfield LD 2,159 Stephen Male C 1,916 Michael Gibson C 1,631 Isobel Mason LD 915 Adrian Beardmore Lab 906 Marina Torselli Grn 207 Biggleswade (2) David Lawrence C 2,884 Madeline Russell C 2,820 Langford and Henlow Village Bernard Briars Lab 2,588 Rex Skinner Lab 2,485 Tony Rogers C 1,903 Margaret Bracey LD 1,866 Neil Cliff LD 1,613 Gee Leach LD 1,543 David Devereux Lab 848 Cranfield Marston Roger Baker C 1,177 Bob King C 1,278 Laurence Pollock Lab 694 Ian Booth LD 1,154 Judith Cunningham LD 540 Flitwick East Maulden and Houghton Conquest Victor Lee C 1,893 Alan Carter C 2,097 John Watton LD 1,502 Mark Cathrall LD 1,134 Gareth Ellis Grn 502 Julian Murray Lab 797 10 LOCAL ELECTION RESULTS 2005 Northill and Blunham Silsoe and Shillington John Scott C 2,277 Rita Drinkwater C 2,040 Nigel Aldis LD 1,489 Alison Graham LD 1,132 Rose Forbes Lab 792 Thoufique Ali Lab 729 Potton Richard Baker C 2,015 Stotfold and Arlesey (2) Patrick Heskins Lab 930 Brian Phillips LD 896 John Saunders C 2,734 John Street C 2,725 Sandy Brian Collier LD 1,863 Douglas Landman Lab 1,584 Peter Blaine LD 1,863 Joseph Mayes Lab 1,343 Doreen Gurney C 1,306 Trevor Barnes LD 1,137 Allister Dennis Lab 773 Oliver Campbell Grn 198 Shefford Woburn and Harlington Robin Younger C 1,863 Anthony Duggan C 2,536 Mark Chapman LD 1,422 Brian Golby LD 2,137 Carolyn Devereux Lab 961 David Lewis Lab 793 South Bedfordshire Barton Leighton Linslade Central (2) Ian Shinglre LD 1,711 Roy Johnstone C 2,408 Peter Parrish C 1,405 Brian Spurr C 2,119 David King Lab 588 Mark Freeman LD 1,986 Adrian Heffernan Lab 1,902 Dunstable Downs (2) Stephen Owen LD 1,865 Margaret Stannard Lab 1,579 Gillian Howard C 3,121 Jennifer Fairbairn C 3,076 Michelle Henderson Lab 1,973 Northfields Joy Shaw Lab 1,674 David Larkman LD 1,363 Duncan Ross Lab 1,444 Sally Pointer LD 1,336 Sheroo Anklesaria C 1,021 Lynda Walmsley LD 613 Grovebury Paul Record C 1,456 Plantation Russell Goodchild LD 1,032 Maurice Blackman Lab 953 Paul Walley C 2,113 Anthony Griffin LD 1,461 Houghton Regis (2) Susan Goodchild LD 2,619 Southcott Jack Goodchild LD 2,530 John Kinchella Lab 2,093 Brian Sadler C 1,563 David Barker Lab 1,930 Peter Snelling LD 1,357 Christopher Pine C 1,597 Peter Palfrey Lab 738 Geoffrey Thompson C 1,427 Icknield South East Bedfordshire Peter Swaisland C 1,430 Richard Stay C 2,691 Janet Pantry Lab 1,145 Javed Akhter Lab 812 Peter Hatswell LD 592 Patricia Larkman LD 631 CHAPTER 1. BEDFORDSHIRE 11 Consolidated Results — Bedfordshire Conservative 81,732 42.8% 36 councillors Liberal Democrat 56,390 29.5% 9 councillors Labour 45,035 23.6% 7 councillors Better Bedford Independent 3,526 1.8% Green Party 2,888 1.5% Independents 1,125 0.6% UK Independence Party 315 0.2% South West Bedfordshire Shirley Gilchrist LD 735 Brian Piggott C 2,815 Raymond Harris Lab 1,048 Watling Toddington Peter Hollick C 1,818 Michael Rogers Lab 945 Rhys Goodwin C 1,871 Alan Keyes LD 569 Edward Keane Lab 771 Gyl Campbell Grn 126 Chapter 2 Buckinghamshire New division boundaries came into force at this election.
Recommended publications
  • RAF Wings Over Florida: Memories of World War II British Air Cadets

    RAF Wings Over Florida: Memories of World War II British Air Cadets

    Purdue University Purdue e-Pubs Purdue University Press Books Purdue University Press Fall 9-15-2000 RAF Wings Over Florida: Memories of World War II British Air Cadets Willard Largent Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/purduepress_ebooks Part of the European History Commons, and the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Largent, Willard, "RAF Wings Over Florida: Memories of World War II British Air Cadets" (2000). Purdue University Press Books. 9. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/purduepress_ebooks/9 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. RAF Wings over Florida RAF Wings over Florida Memories of World War II British Air Cadets DE Will Largent Edited by Tod Roberts Purdue University Press West Lafayette, Indiana Copyright q 2000 by Purdue University. First printing in paperback, 2020. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America Paperback ISBN: 978-1-55753-992-2 Epub ISBN: 978-1-55753-993-9 Epdf ISBN: 978-1-61249-138-7 The Library of Congress has cataloged the earlier hardcover edition as follows: Largent, Willard. RAF wings over Florida : memories of World War II British air cadets / Will Largent. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-55753-203-6 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Largent, Willard. 2. World War, 1939±1945ÐAerial operations, British. 3. World War, 1939±1945ÐAerial operations, American. 4. Riddle Field (Fla.) 5. Carlstrom Field (Fla.) 6. World War, 1939±1945ÐPersonal narratives, British. 7. Great Britain. Royal Air ForceÐBiography. I.
  • Immigrants and Counterterrorism Policy: a Comparative Study of the United States and Britain

    Immigrants and Counterterrorism Policy: a Comparative Study of the United States and Britain

    IMMIGRANTS AND COUNTERTERRORISM POLICY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE UNITED STATES AND BRITAIN A dissertation presented by David Michael Smith to The Department of Political Science In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science Northeastern University Boston, MA April 2013 1 IMMIGRANTS AND COUNTERTERRORISM POLICY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE UNITED STATES AND BRITAIN by David Michael Smith ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate School of Social Sciences and Humanities of Northeastern University April 2013 2 Abstract This project examines the political mechanisms through which foreign nationals are perceived as security threats and, as a consequence, disproportionately targeted by counterterrorism policies. Evidence suggests that domestic security strategies that unduly discriminate against non-citizens or national minorities are counterproductive; such strategies lead to a loss of state legitimacy, they complicate the gathering of intelligence, and they serve as a potential source of radicalization. At the same time, discriminatory counterterrorism policies represent a significant break from liberal democratic ideals by legitimizing unfair treatment of targeted groups. If discriminatory counterterrorism policies are counterproductive and undemocratic, why do policymakers support such strategies in the first place? By what means do these types of policies and related administrative measures gain traction in the political system? How do these measures operate in practice, and what accounts for variations in their implementation over time? To answer these questions, a policy process model is used that distinguishes between the problem definition and agenda setting, policy formulation and legitimation, and policy implementation phases of policymaking.
  • Democracy Club: 2021 English Local Elections Briefing

    Democracy Club: 2021 English Local Elections Briefing

    English Local Elections 6 May 2021 This briefing contains a detailed summary of the candidates standing for election in the English local elections, to be held on 6 May 2021. This data includes by-elections in England, but does not cover the estimated 2,000 town and parish councils holding elections on 6 May.1 The data is drawn from 4,115 Statements of Persons Nominated published by English councils on 8-9 April 2021, and was manually collected and checked by Democracy Club’s nationwide network of volunteers. All numbers reflect our database as of 13 April 2021. The full candidate CSV datafiles can be downloaded from our Candidates database. Details of candidates per party and ward can be found here. Democracy Club would like to thank the hundreds of people who volunteered their time between 8-12 April 2021 to collect the data which made this analysis possible. Voters can get locally specific information at WhoCanIVoteFor.co.uk. About Democracy Club Democracy Club is a Community Interest Company which builds digital tools to support everyone’s participation in UK elections. We believe that information about upcoming elections should be easy to find, especially online. Our free and accessible tools and databases are used by millions of UK voters each year. Democracy Club works closely with local government, and is a data provider to The Electoral Commission. Democracy Club’s vision is of an electoral system which is fit for the digital age. 1 Town and parish councils estimate courtesy of the National Association of Local Councils. 1 Key summary ● Combining scheduled elections and by-elections, exactly 5,000 councillors are to be elected on 6 May.
  • County and European Elections

    County and European Elections

    County and European elections Report 5 June 2009 and Analysis County and European elections Report and 5 June 2009 Analysis County and European elections 5 June 2009 3 Contents 5 Acknowledgements 7 Executive summary 9 Political context 11 Electoral systems 13 The European Parliament elections 27 The local authority elections 39 The mayoral elections 43 National implications 51 A tale of two elections 53 Appendix 53 Definition of STV European Parliament constituencies 55 Abbreviations County and European elections 5 June 2009 5 Acknowledgements The author, Lewis Baston, would like to thank his colleagues at the Electoral Reform Society for their help in compiling the data from these elections, particularly Andrew White, Hywel Nelson and Magnus Smidak in the research team, and those campaign staff who lent their assistance. Beatrice Barleon did valuable work that is reflected in the European sections. Thank you also to Ashley Dé for his efforts in bringing it to publication, and to Tom Carpenter for design work. Several Regional Returning Officers, and Adam Gray, helped with obtaining local detail on the European election results. Any errors of fact or judgement are my own. County and European elections 5 June 2009 7 Executive summary 1. In the European elections only 43.4 per cent 9. Many county councils now have lopsided supported either the Conservatives or Labour, Conservative majorities that do not reflect the the lowest such proportion ever. While this was balance of opinion in their areas. connected with the political climate over MPs’ expenses, it merely continues a long-term 10. This is bad for democracy because of the trend of decline in the two-party system.
  • Appendix 2 – Review of Other Council Governance Arrangements

    Appendix 2 – Review of Other Council Governance Arrangements

    Appendix 2 – Review of other Council Governance Arrangements Name of Council System/Structure of Political Makeup Reasons for change Population size Demographics Sparse Member? Governance Plymouth City Council No Change – operate 57 Councillors – 30 Labour, Didn’t change. Review design principles were 262,100 Urban Unitary Council No (Unitary) Executive arrangements. 17 Conservative & 10 open and transparent, accountable, Area of 30.82 sq miles Have cabinet of 10, 4 Independent responsive, inclusive, clear, flexible and best (79.83 sq km) Scrutiny Committees and for Plymouth. Decided that Strong Leader other Committees, Boards Model was the most efficient for decision and Panels making. Decided to develop the Executive model instead of changing arrangements. Lancashire County No Change – operate 84 Councillors – 44 Didn’t change. A Working Group gathered 1,219,799 Area of 1,187 sq miles Yes Council Executive arrangements. Conservatives, 30 Labour, 5 evidence and presented three options to the (3,075 sq km) Have a Cabinet of 8, 4 Independents and 4 Liberal Council in December 2014 – these were Covers Blackburn with Scrutiny Committees and Democrats Cabinet Model, Hybrid Model and Committee Darwen, Blackpool and other Committees Currently have 1 vacancy Model. The presented the advantages and Lancashire Have Cabinet Committees disadvantages of each model. The Working and Working Groups, 5 x Group felt there was a significant issues in Champions (Older People, relation to the Committee system of balancing Young People, Parishes, the need to keep decision making efficient and Disabled People and Armed streamlined, and yet to ensure there were Forces and Veterans) and 5 sufficient meetings in the calendar.
  • Politics in Bristol, 1865–86 by RICHARD WOODBERRY

    Politics in Bristol, 1865–86 by RICHARD WOODBERRY

    Trans. Bristol & Gloucestershire Archaeological Society 130 (2012), 241–277 Politics in Bristol, 1865–86 By RICHARD WOODBERRY Whilst Bristol’s status as a port, its economic history and reasons for decline have been meticulously and widely studied for the mid to late Victorian period, its politics have been sadly ignored. The perception that the city’s great days had gone, that Liverpool hugely surpassed it as a port, Manchester was an alternative capital city, Birmingham had evolved as the hub of a great industrial hinterland and Leeds as a dynamic regional centre, all contributed to the historical neglect. No major national political figure emerged from Bristol in the period. For the Liberals the party leadership was either in the north, or in the House of Lords, or when in Birmingham was by- passed; for the Conservatives the centre of gravity remained in the counties in general, though not necessarily the southern ones, or Lancashire in particular, and London, where urban Toryism of a reform, if not a democratic, nature, grew.1 Disraeli’s famous Act of 1867 had a major effect on the structure of Bristol’s politics, almost doubling the electorate, modernising the parties, opening up new techniques of seeking political favours and broadening the nature of debate and discourse. Nevertheless, it did not alter the outcome of the city’s election results, which had been, and continued to be, Liberal. Apart from one fleeting by-election victory in April 1868 (overturned in Nov.), no Conservative was returned for Bristol from 1852–85.2 In terms of the size of its population by the 1860s Bristol had fallen from second place (as achieved in the previous century) to tenth due to industry sweeping production and people northwards.3 The comparative figures for both population and size of electorate are detailed below: 1.
  • General Election 2005 17 MAY 2005 [Final Edition – 10 March 2006]

    General Election 2005 17 MAY 2005 [Final Edition – 10 March 2006]

    RESEARCH PAPER 05/33 General Election 2005 17 MAY 2005 [Final edition – 10 March 2006] This paper presents a summary of the results of the United Kingdom General Election held on 5 May 2005. It provides an analysis of voting nationally and by country, region, county and constituency. It is uses the official results as published by the Electoral Commission and replaces the version of this paper published on 17 May 2005. The results of the postponed contest in South Staffordshire are included. Labour won 355 of the 646 seats contested. The Conservatives won 198 seats and the Liberal Democrats 62. Labour polled 35.2% of the vote, the Conservatives 32.4% and the Liberal Democrats 22.0%. Turnout was 61.4%. Adam Mellows-Facer SOCIAL AND GENERAL STATISTICS SECTION HOUSE OF COMMONS LIBRARY RESEARCH PAPER 05/33 Recent Library Research Papers include: 06/01 The International Development (Reporting and Transparency) Bill 11.01.06 [Bill 19 of 2005-06] 06/02 Social Indicators [includes article: New Year resolutions – how do 12.01.06 they figure?] 06/03 Unemployment by Constituency, December 2005 18.01.06 06/04 The Merchant Shipping (Pollution) Bill [Bill 68 of 2005-06] 23.01.06 06/05 Economic Indicators, February 2006 [includes article: 01.02.06 The 80% employment aspiration] 06/06 The Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill [Bill 111 of 2005-06] 06.02.06 06/07 The Children and Adoption Bill [Bill 96 of 2005-06] 07.02.06 06/08 Sudan: The Elusive Quest for Peace 08.02.06 06/09 Inflation: The value of the pound 1750-2005 13.02.06 06/10 Unemployment by
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard

    Whole Day Download the Hansard

    Thursday Volume 689 11 February 2021 No. 176 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 11 February 2021 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2021 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 465 11 FEBRUARY 2021 466 Ian Levy [V]: In 2019, I think we all took for granted House of Commons the ability to run election campaigns that could properly engage with the electorate. Campaigning for this year’s Thursday 11 February 2021 elections on 6 May will look very different, but now more than ever, there is a need to engage with our constituents. Does my right hon. Friend agree that it is The House met at half-past Nine o’clock vital that all those who stand for elections should be able to convey their messages to voters, and will he PRAYERS please elaborate on how he believes campaigning should go ahead in a covid-secure way? [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Michael Gove: My hon. Friend is absolutely right: Virtual participation in proceedings commenced democracy should not be cancelled because of covid-19. (Orders, 4 June and 30 December 2020). The polls that are scheduled for May will go ahead, and [NB: [V] denotes a Member participating virtually.] it is important that he and others communicate with his constituents. Of course, social media provides one means of doing so. At the moment, door-to-door campaigning and leafleting are not allowed because of covid restrictions, Oral Answers to Questions but we will be reviewing how we can make sure that he and others can keep faith with the constituents who elected him so memorably just over a year ago.
  • STATEMENT of PERSONS NOMINATED Election of a Unitary

    STATEMENT of PERSONS NOMINATED Election of a Unitary

    STATEMENT OF PERSONS NOMINATED Date of Election: Thursday 4 May 2017 Election of a Unitary Councillor The following is a statement of the persons nominated for election as a Unitary Councillor for Aldbourne and Ramsbury Number of vacant seats: 1 Reason why Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) Name of Proposer no longer nominated* BISHOP 18 West Street, Liberal Democrats White Barbara A Fran Aldbourne, Wiltshire, SN8 2BS HAYTHORNTHWAITE 89 Lottage Rd, Labour Party Plummer Fiona J Jason Steven Aldbourne, Wilts, SN8 2EB SHEPPARD Poulton Grange, The Conservative Price Richard S James Henry Poulton Farm Party Candidate Estate, Marlborough, SN8 2LN UTTON Grey Wethers, 3 Green Party Scott John B Brian Roy Coles Meadow, Ogbourne St George, Marlborough, SN8 1SU *Decision of the Returning Officer that the nomination is invalid or other reason why a person nominated no longer stands nominated. The persons above against whose name no entry is made in the last column have been and stand validly nominated. Please note that following the recent changes to the legislation the statutory deadline for withdrawal of candidature is now the same time and date as the statutory deadline for receipt of nomination papers. A POLL WILL BE TAKEN on Thursday 4 May 2017 between the hours of 7:00 am and 10:00 pm. Where contested this poll is taken together with the election of Parish Councillors Dated Wednesday 5 April 2017 Dr Carlton Brand Returning Officer Printed and published by the Returning Officer, Electoral Services, Wiltshire Council, County
  • The Evolution of Parliament

    The Evolution of Parliament

    THE EVOLUTION OF PARLIAMENT BY A. F. POLLARD, M.A., LITT.D. SECOND EDITION, REVISED First published in 1920 Second edition 1926 PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION THISvolulne is the outcome of studies which were turned Ln the direction of constitutional history partly by my appointment to a chair with that title at University College, London, in 1903, and more specifically by my election in 1908 to a fellowship at All Souls' College, Oxford, on con- dltion of pursuing researches suggested by the late F. W. Maitland. The first sketch of this essay took the form of six public lectures delivered in London in Lent Term 1913, which were expanded into fifteen lectures given on the Goldwin Smith foundation at Cornell University and else- where in the United States in the following spring. The manuscript was completed, save for some notes and refer- ences, in August 1915, when the increasing tension of the war put a stop to remoter studies. During these seventeen years the history of the English parliament has attracted the labour of several learned historians, and particular acknowledgement is due to Pro- fessor C. H. McIlwain's High Court of Parliament, which, coming into my hands at the end of 1912, confirmed the trend of my investigations and supplied me with fresh ideas and illustrations. Another American book, Professor Bald- win's King's Council in the Middle Ages, published in 1914, threw valuable light on a collateral subject. But the starting-point for all of us has been Maitland's introduction to the Menzoranda de Parliarnento, which he edited for the Rolls Series in 1893, the most original and suggestive essay v vi PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION vii that has ever been written on the medieval English par- held at University Collcge during the last six years liament.
  • Appendix 2 – Review of Other Council Governance Arrangements

    Appendix 2 – Review of Other Council Governance Arrangements

    Appendix 2 – Review of other Council Governance Arrangements Name of Council System/Structure of Political Makeup Reasons for change Population size Demographics Sparse Member? Governance Plymouth City Council No Change – operate 57 Councillors – 30 Labour, Didn’t change. Review design principles were 262,100 Urban Unitary Council No (Unitary) Executive arrangements. 17 Conservative & 10 open and transparent, accountable, Area of 30.82 sq miles Have cabinet of 10, 4 Independent responsive, inclusive, clear, flexible and best (79.83 sq km) Scrutiny Committees and for Plymouth. Decided that Strong Leader other Committees, Boards Model was the most efficient for decision and Panels making. Decided to develop the Executive model instead of changing arrangements. Lancashire County No Change – operate 84 Councillors – 44 Didn’t change. A Working Group gathered 1,219,799 Area of 1,187 sq miles Yes Council Executive arrangements. Conservatives, 30 Labour, 5 evidence and presented three options to the (3,075 sq km) Have a Cabinet of 8, 4 Independents and 4 Liberal Council in December 2014 – these were Covers Blackburn with Scrutiny Committees and Democrats Cabinet Model, Hybrid Model and Committee Darwen, Blackpool and other Committees Currently have 1 vacancy Model. The presented the advantages and Lancashire Have Cabinet Committees disadvantages of each model. The Working and Working Groups, 5 x Group felt there was a significant issues in Champions (Older People, relation to the Committee system of balancing Young People, Parishes, the need to keep decision making efficient and Disabled People and Armed streamlined, and yet to ensure there were Forces and Veterans) and 5 sufficient meetings in the calendar.
  • Agenda Reports Pack (Public)

    Agenda Reports Pack (Public)

    SUMMONS Council Meeting PLEASE SIGN THE ATTENDANCE Date: 10 July 2012 BOOK BEFORE ENTERING THE Time: 10.30 am COUNCIL CHAMBER Place: Please direct any enquiries on this Agenda to Yamina Rhouati, of Democratic Services, County Hall, Trowbridge, direct line 01225 718024 or email [email protected] Press enquiries to Communications on direct lines (01225)713114/713115. This summons and all the documents referred to within it are available on the Council’s website at www.wiltshire.gov.uk PART I Items to be considered while the meeting is open to the public 1 Apologies 2 Minutes of Previous Meeting (Pages 1 - 46) To approve as a correct record and sign the minutes of the following meetings: Annual meeting of Council 15 May 2012 (copy attached) Extraordinary meeting of Council 26 June 2012 (to follow) 3 Declarations of Interest To declare any pecuniary or non-pecuniary interests or dispensations granted by the Standards Committee. 4 Announcements by the Chairman 5 Petitions 5a) Petitions Received No petitions have been received for presentation to this meeting. 5b) Petitions Update (Pages 47 - 50) Report of the Head of Democratic Services 6 Public Participation The Council welcomes contributions from members of the public. Statements If you would like to make a statement at this meeting on any item on this agenda, please register to do so at least 10 minutes prior to the meeting. Up to 3 speakers are permitted to speak for up to 3 minutes each on any agenda item. Please contact the officer named above for any further clarification.