A New Lease of Life Understanding the Risks of Synthetic Biology 02

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A New Lease of Life Understanding the Risks of Synthetic Biology 02 Emerging Risks Report 2018 Understanding Risk A new lease of life Understanding the risks of synthetic biology 02 Disclaimer Key Contacts This report has been co-produced by Lloyd's and Drs Trevor Maynard John Heap and Karen Polizzi of Imperial College London Head of Innovation for general information purposes only. While care has [email protected] been taken in gathering the data and preparing the report, Lloyd's and the authors do not make any For general enquiries about this report and Lloyd’s representations or warranties as to its accuracy or work on innovation, please contact completeness and expressly excludes to the maximum [email protected] extent permitted by law all those that might otherwise be implied. About the authors Lloyd's and the authors accept no responsibility or liability John Heap PhD, BSc, is a Senior Lecturer in the for any loss or damage of any nature occasioned to any Department of Life Sciences and Karen Polizzi PhD, person as a result of acting or refraining from acting as a BSc, is a Reader in the Department of Chemical result of, or in reliance on, any statement, fact, figure or Engineering at Imperial College London. Both are expression of opinion or belief contained in this report. members of the Imperial College Centre for Synthetic This report does not constitute advice of any kind. Biology. They each have more than 10 years' experience in biotechnology and synthetic biology research, lead © Lloyd’s 2018 research teams working in these areas, and teach these All rights reserved subjects to undergraduate and postgraduate students. About Lloyd’s Lucy Stanbrough MSc, BSc, is an Associate in the Innovation team at Lloyd’s. Subjects covered in recent Lloyd's is the world's specialist insurance and years include: cyber scenarios; future city resilience; and reinsurance market. Under our globally trusted name, we disaster risk finance. Prior to joining Lloyd’s, she worked act as the market's custodian. Backed by diverse global for over 10 years as a natural hazards and GIS capital and excellent financial ratings, Lloyd's works with consultant, alongside working at the UCL Hazard Centre. a global network to grow the insured world –building Lucy has contributed to a number of books on the use of resilience of local communities and strengthening global technology and online systems pre, during, and post- economic growth. disaster. She maintains an interest in the integration of scientific knowledge to business applications, and With expertise earned over centuries, Lloyd's is the connecting knowledge to people, and people to foundation of the insurance industry and the future of it. knowledge. Led by expert underwriters and brokers who cover more than 200 territories, the Lloyd’s market develops the Citation essential, complex and critical insurance needed to underwrite human progress. Please cite this report as: About The Imperial College Centre for Synthetic Polizzi KM, Stanbrough L and Heap JT (2018) A new lease of life: Understanding the risks of synthetic biology. Biology An emerging risks report published by Lloyd’s of London. The Imperial College Centre for Synthetic Biology (IC- CSynB) is a multidisciplinary, research centre involving Acknowledgements 36 research groups across the Faculties of Natural The following people were consulted or commented on Sciences, Medicine, and Engineering at Imperial College earlier drafts of the report; we would like to thank them all London. for their contributions: Lloyd’s project team − Dr Trevor Maynard, Head of Innovation − Dr Keith Smith, Innovation team − Lucy Stanbrough, Innovation team − Flemmich Webb, Speech and Studies − Linda Miller, Global Marketing A new lease of life – Understanding the risks of synthetic biology 03 Contents Executive summary ............................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 2. Current applications ........................................................................................................................................................ 14 2.1 Healthcare ................................................................................................................................................................. 15 2.2 Nutrition ..................................................................................................................................................................... 16 2.3 Manufacturing ............................................................................................................................................................ 18 2.4 Energy ....................................................................................................................................................................... 19 2.5 Consumer products ................................................................................................................................................... 20 2.6 Services enabling research and development .......................................................................................................... 21 2.7 Future developments on the horizon ......................................................................................................................... 22 3. Stakeholders driving development .................................................................................................................................. 25 3.1 Academic research .................................................................................................................................................... 25 2.2 Commercial research and development ................................................................................................................... 27 2.3 DIYBio: Do-it-yourself synthetic biology .................................................................................................................... 28 4. Risk pathways ................................................................................................................................................................. 31 4.1 Bioerror ...................................................................................................................................................................... 32 4.2 Bioterror ..................................................................................................................................................................... 34 4.3 Unintended consequences ........................................................................................................................................ 36 5. Regulation ....................................................................................................................................................................... 43 6. Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................................................... 46 7. Key conclusions of the 2009 report ................................................................................................................................ 48 References .......................................................................................................................................................................... 52 A new lease of life – Understanding the risks of synthetic biology Executive summary 04 Executive summary Despite the huge number and diversity of naturally- Developments since 2009 occurring living things in the world today, they represent only a tiny fraction of the organisms that could The market has continued to grow, with estimates of theoretically exist. Over the past few years scientists $1.1bn in 2010 (OECD, 2011), $5.2bn in 2015 (Singh, have been trying to develop altered or wholly new 2014), to forecasts of $38.7bn by 2020 (Sumant, 2016). organisms using biotechnology for a range of A number of new established commercial entities have applications, including disease prevention and treatment, emerged out of the start-up and spinout companies that fuel, chemical production, crop resistance and even were formed off the back of early research discoveries. space exploration. This first wave of companies have seen a significant increase in capital support. Industry research estimated In recent years this work has increasingly been referred that equity funding to private synthetic biology companies to as synthetic biology, although there is a number of topped $1bn in 2016, with some start-ups seeing funding different definitions in common usage. Lloyd’s first rounds of more than $100m (CB Insights, 2017). explored the topic in 2009 in its report: ‘Synthetic biology: influencing development’. This 2009 report concluded The university synthetic biology research sector also that: “Synthetic biology is in its infancy and the first remains strong and government investment in academic commercial applications are likely to appear as research has continued, although there are signs this is incremental to traditional genetic modification… starting to plateau. Governments are also investing in Depending on the pace of development we might expect regional centres of excellence. to see fully commercialised outputs from
Recommended publications
  • Institute of Management Services
    Journal of the Institute of Management Services Achieving excellence through people and productivity Management Services Productivity at the Crossroads Creating a socially, economically and environmentally Spring 2011 Volume 55 Number 1 responsible world ISSN: 0 307 6768 CONTACTS Spring 2010 Volume 55 No 1 ISSN 0 307 6768 Management Services 27 Castle Street, Canterbury, Kent CT1 2PX Editorial Telephone +44 (0)1795 542436 The Institute of Management Services is the primary body in the UK Facsimile +44 (0)1795 535469 concerned with the promotion, practice and development of the range Email [email protected] Editorial deadline for the Summer 2011 issue is 4 May of methodologies and techniques for the improvement of productivity Publication date is 6 June and quality, known collectively as ‘Management Services’. This embraces the disciplines of industrial engineering, work study, organisation and Advertising methods, systems analysis, and a wide range of management information Rob Aspin and control techniques as illustrated in our Body of Knowledge. Telephone +44 (0)1795 542413 Fax +44 (0)1795 535469 The Institute acts as the qualifying body for the Management Services Email [email protected] profession in the UK, focusing developments in practice and knowledge Media Committee and acting as a forum for information exchange. This in turn enables our David Blanchfl ower, Julian Cutler, Mel Armstrong members who work under a variety of job titles across the whole of the UK economy, to make a more effective contribution to the well-being of Editor their own organisation and to the nation’s economy as a whole. Mel Armstrong In addition to creating and upholding professional standards for the Designer Becky Ellison practice of management services through the adoption of a code of ethics and the provision of a system of qualifying examinations, the Institute Published by of Management Services collaborates with national and international The Deeson Group Ltd on behalf of professional bodies in similar fi elds.
    [Show full text]
  • Gardens and Gardening in a Fast-Changing Urban Environment
    Gardens and Gardening in a fast-changing urban environment: Manchester 1750-1850 A Thesis submitted to Manchester Metropolitan University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Joy Margaret Uings April 2013 MIRIAD, Manchester Metropolitan University List of Contents Abstract i Acknowledgments ii Tables, maps and images iv The Growth of Manchester and its suburbs 1750-1850 1 Introduction 3 Literature Review 11 History of Manchester 11 Class and Gender 15 Garden Design 22 Horticulture, Floriculture and Nurseries 28 Methodology 35 Chapter One: Horticultural Trade 45 Gardeners and nurserymen 46 Seedsmen and florists 48 Fruiterers and confectioners 51 Manchester and the North-west 52 1750-1790 53 1790-1830 57 1830-1850 61 Post 1850 71 Connections 73 Summary 77 Chapter Two: Plants 79 Forest trees 79 Fruit trees 89 Evergreen and flowering shrubs 97 Florist’s flowers 99 Exotic (hothouse) plants 107 Hardy plants 109 Vegetables 110 Agricultural Seeds 112 The fascination with unusual plants 114 The effect of weather on plants 117 Plant thefts 120 Summary 125 Chapter Three: Environmental Changes 127 Development of the town 128 Development of the suburbs 135 Smoke pollution 145 Summary 154 Chapter Four: Private Gardens 157 Garden design and composition 160 Garden designers 168 Urban gardens 171 Country gardens 179 Suburban gardens 185 Cottage gardens 195 Allotments 198 Summary 202 Chapter Five: Public Gardens 205 Gardens for refreshment 206 Gardens for pleasure 211 Gardens for activity 223 Gardens for education 230 Summary 243 Chapter Six: Public Spaces 245 Public footpaths – the ancient right of way 246 Whit week 254 Manchester’s public parks 256 Summary 275 Chapter Seven: The Element of Competition 277 Florist’s feasts 279 Horticultural shows 286 Gooseberry Shows 300 Summary 307 Conclusion 309 Horticultural Trade 309 Plants 311 Environmental Changes 313 Private Gardens 313 Public Gardens 314 Public Spaces 315 The Element of Competition 316 Summary 316 Appendix One: More Horticultural Tradesmen 318 Appendix Two: Robert Turner’s stock 342 Appendix Three: R.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper 112 1972 – 1982 Negotiation
    Falklands Wars – the History of the Falkland Islands: with particular regard to Spanish and Argentine pretensions and taking some account of South Georgia, the South Sandwich Islands and Britain's Antarctic Territories by Roger Lorton 1 Paper 112 1972 – 1982 Negotiation “the only other option open to the Argentine government is a resort to force.” 3 ◈ In 1965 the United Nations had called upon the UK and Argentina to commence negotiations with a view to resolve the single issue that lay between them – sovereignty over the Falkland Islands. Talks had started in 1968, but had been slow to produce anything tangible. Added to the different perceptions of historic rights, which neither side were prepared to discuss, there was an addition problem. Just the year after calling for negotiations, the UN had adopted the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Unsigned by Argentina, and only reluctantly acknowledged by the UK, the Covenant confirmed that “all people have the right of self-determination.” Not a principle to be aimed for, but a human right. Th Covenant acknowledged that only the Falkland Islanders could decide their future, giving them a power of veto over any deal that could be struck with Argentina. This paper considers the slow breakdown in negotiations and the changing political landscape in Argentina. Mixed together, they would produce a fateful decision. 1972 – January 7th, Libertad sails from Buenos Aires with tourists for Antarctica. On board is Britain's Ambassador to Argentina, Michael Hadow. With him is Mario Izaguirre, of Argentina’s Foreign Ministry. Both bound for Stanley. 4 January 8th, Argentina's state-owned airline, LADE, initiates twice-monthly amphibious flights between Comodoro Rivadavia and the Falkland Islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Boundary & Territory Briefing
    International Boundaries Research Unit BOUNDARY & TERRITORY BRIEFING Volume 1 Number 1 Who Owns Antarctica? Governing and Managing the Last Continent Peter J. Beck Boundary and Territory Briefing Volume 1 Number1 ISBN 1-897643-05-5 1994 Who Owns Antarctica?: Governing and Managing the Last Continent by Peter J. Beck Edited by Clive Schofield International Boundaries Research Unit Department of Geography University of Durham South Road Durham DH1 3LE UK Tel: UK + 44 (0) 191 334 1961 Fax: UK +44 (0) 191 334 1962 E-mail: [email protected] www: http://www-ibru.dur.ac.uk The Author Professor Peter J. Beck is Professor of International History in the Faculty of Human Sciences at Kingston University, Kingston upon Thames, England. Educated at the London School of Economics, University of London, he has lectured at Kingston since 1968. His publications include The International Politics of Antarctica (London: Croom Helm, 1986), The Falkland Islands as an International Problem (London: Routledge, 1988), and British Documents on Foreign Affairs. Reports and Papers From the Foreign Office Confidential Prints: The League of Nations, vols.1-6 (Maryland: University Publications of America, 1992). He has written over 120 articles/chapters in journals and books published in both Britain and overseas, and is a regular contributor to both Polar Record and the Scott Polar Research Institute's M.Phil. Polar Studies course at the University of Cambridge. Professor Beck was a member of the Royal Institute of International Affairs' Latin American Study group responsible for the 1989 study on British Relations in Latin America during the 1990s, while he has given expert evidence to the British House of Commons Foreign Affairs and Education and Science Committees.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral History of Science Collections and Projects
    ORAL HISTORY OF SCIENCE COLLECTIONS AND PROJECTS This list was compiled by Simone Turchetti1 as an appendix to 'The Oral History of Science in Britain: A Scoping Survey' for National Lifes Stories in September 2007: 1 Centre for the History of Science, Technology and Medicine (CHSTM), University of Manchester. E- mail: [email protected]. APPENDIX 1: ORAL HISTORY PROJECTS 1. In Britain. Focussing on science, technology and medicine: Before the 1960s IET Faraday Medallists films, Institution of Engineering and Technology, London2 1960-69 Scientists in British Industry, 1964-1967, British Library3 Experiment: A Series of Scientific Case Histories, 1964, BBC4 1970-79 Science Studies Unit (SSU) Oral History Project (genetics), 1969-1971, University of Edinburgh5 SSU Oral History Project (science), 1969-1971, University of Edinburgh6 2 Issues covered: Strictly speaking this is not oral history. But from as early as 1918, the winners of the Faraday Medal are asked to present their life and work in a speech recorded on a 16mm film (and more recently on U-matic videotape). The films have a duration of about 15 minutes. Interview subjects: 95 medallists including E. Rutherford, E. Appleton, George Thomson, Mark Oliphant, Nevill Mott, Bernard Lovell, Oliver Lodge, John Cockcroft, Hermann Bondi. Location of videos: IET Archives, London. 3 Issues covered: these are interviews made by Stephen Cotgrove in preparation for his book, (Gerald Waters and Stephen Cotgrove (eds.), Scientists in the British Industry, Bath: University Press, 1967) and then given to the British Library. Interview subjects: 11 chemists. Location of Transcripts: BL Sound Archive. 4 Issues covered: Talks by distinguished scientists conducted by David O.
    [Show full text]