DOCSLIB.ORG

(CPC) Outreach Journal #1091

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(CPC) Outreach Journal #1091 Issue No. 1091, 22 November 2013 Articles & Other Documents: Featured Article: Nuclear Missile Force's Troubles Run Deep; Key Officers "Burned Out" 1. Israel’s Peres Warns of Nuclear Middle East 2. France ‘Will Not Tolerate’ Nuclear Proliferation: Hollande 3. Iran Says next Nuclear Talks will be 'Difficult' 4. Iran's Rouhani Warns West against 'Excessive' Nuclear Demands 5. No EU Country Comes Forward as Candidate to Destroy Syria's Chemical Stockpiles 6. Iran Has Developed a New Nuclear Site, Dissidents Say 7. Nuclear Talks Will Be Halted if U.S. Imposes New Sanctions: Iranian MP 8. ‘Real Chance’ for Nuclear Deal, Putin Tells Rohani 9. Syrian Chemical Weapons May Be Destroyed at Sea – OPCW Spokesman 10. Iran Won't Back Down in Nuclear Talks, Supreme Leader Vows 11. Netanyahu 'Promises' Iran Will Not Get Nuclear Weapons 12. Nuclear Talks Hit Standstill as Iran Demands Right to Enrich Uranium, Sanctions Relief 13. Admiral: China Nuclear Missile Submarine Threat is Not Credible 14. N. Korea Can Produce Uranium-Based Nuclear Bomb: Seoul's Defense Chief 15. China’s Nuclear Arsenal Getting Larger: Report 16. U.S. Envoy Keeps Pressure on N. Korea to 'Cease' Nuclear Activity 17. Russian Envoy: South Asian Nuclear Arms Race a 'Dangerous Thing' 18. 'Pak Nuclear Weapons' Threat Under Estimated' 19. Russian Defense Ministry Blames Makers for Failed Missile Launch 20. No Room for Error for US Nuclear Forces: Hagel 21. Inside the Ring: U.S. Funds China’s Nuclear Security 22. Nuclear Missile Force's Troubles Run Deep; Key Officers "Burned Out" 23. Despite Promises, Obama Planning to Close ICBM Squadron 24. Annual U.S. Congress Report on China is Curiously Light on Nuclear Arms Info 25. Making the Cut: Reducing the SSBN Force 26. International Security Demands U.S. Intercontinental-Range Missiles 27. Chinese Nuclear Force Modernization and Its Arms Control Implications Welcome to the CPC Outreach Journal. As part of USAF Counterproliferation Center’s mission to counter weapons of mass destruction through education and research, we’re providing our government and civilian community a source for timely counterproliferation information. This information includes articles, papers and other documents addressing issues pertinent to US military response options for dealing with chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) threats and countermeasures. It’s our hope this information resource will help enhance your counterproliferation issue awareness. Established in 1998, the USAF/CPC provides education and research to present and future leaders of the Air Force, as well as to members of other branches of the armed services and Department of Defense. Our purpose is to help those agencies better prepare to counter the threat from weapons of mass destruction. Please feel free to visit our web site at http://cpc.au.af.mil/ for in-depth information and specific points of contact. The following articles, papers or documents do not necessarily reflect official endorsement of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or other US government agencies. Reproduction for private use or commercial gain is subject to original copyright restrictions. All rights are reserved. Issue No.1091, 22 November 2013 The following articles, papers or documents do not necessarily reflect official endorsement of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or other US government agencies. Reproduction for private use or commercial gain is subject to original copyright restrictions. All rights are reserved. United States Air Force Counterproliferation Research & Education | Maxwell AFB, Montgomery AL Phone: 334.953.7538 | Fax: 334.953.7530 Al Arabiya – U.A.E. Israel’s Peres Warns of Nuclear Middle East Staff writer, Al Arabiya News Sunday, 17 November 2013 Middle Eastern countries will want to obtain nuclear weapons if Iran is allowed to develop an atomic bomb, Israel’s President Shimon Peres said on Saturday ahead of a meeting with French President Francois Hollande. Shimon Peres told a French newspaper that he appreciated France's firm stance in negotiations earlier this month on Iran's nuclear program, adding that there should be “no let-up” in the international pressure on Tehran, Agence France- Presse reported. “We are convinced that if Iran manufactures its bomb, all the countries of the Middle East will want to follow suit,” the Israeli president was quoted as saying in French weekly Le Journal du Dimanche. Peres will meet the French President on Sunday, in Hollande’s three-day visit to Israel amid the renewed efforts by the West to curb Iran’s disputed nuclear program. The French president is also hoping to give a push to stalled peace talks with the Palestinians and to try to boost trade with Israel, which stood at $3 billion in 2011. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has also urged on Saturday France to maintain its firm stance on international negotiations with Iran. Hollande’s office said that although France’s “tactical approach” on Iran was different from Israel’s more bellicose stance, both seek to prevent Tehran from developing a nuclear weapon, according to AFP. Israel and world powers suspect the Islamic Republic's uranium enrichment program is aimed at obtaining nuclear weapons, an allegation vehemently denied by Tehran. Iranian hardliners have blamed France for scampering a deal that would have given the West guarantees Tehran was not acquiring atomic weapons in exchange for an easing of crippling economic sanctions against Iran. The P5+1 negotiations with Tehran consist of the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council, Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States plus Germany. The talks are due to resume in Geneva in the coming week. With Agence France-Presse (AFP). http://english.alarabiya.net/en/News/middle-east/2013/11/17/Israel-s-Peres-warns-of-nuclear-Middle-East-.html (Return to Articles and Documents List) Daily News Egypt – Cairo, Egypt France ‘Will Not Tolerate’ Nuclear Proliferation: Hollande Israel and Western powers suspect Iran’s uranium enrichment programme is part of a covert drive to acquire a nuclear weapons capability, an allegation Tehran vehemently denies. Daily News Egypt, Agence France-Presse (AFP) November 17, 2013 AFP – France will not accept the proliferation of nuclear arms, President Francois Hollande said on Sunday after arriving in Israel for a visit expected to focus on Iran’s controversial nuclear drive. “France will not tolerate nuclear proliferation,” he said in a speech on the red carpet shortly after landing at Ben Gurion airport near Tel Aviv. Issue No. 1091, 22 November 2013 United States Air Force Counterproliferation Research & Education | Maxwell AFB, Montgomery AL Phone: 334.953.7538 | Fax: 334.953.7530 “As long as we are not certain that Iran has decided to give up on nuclear weapons, we will continue with all our demands and with sanctions.” Israel and Western powers suspect Iran’s uranium enrichment programme is part of a covert drive to acquire a nuclear weapons capability, an allegation Tehran vehemently denies. “When France defends its positions in the discussions under way, it of course takes into account the issues which you have explained but it is also with an awareness of what is at stake for the planet,” Hollande added. “France considers nuclear proliferation to be a menace, a danger, and in Iran particularly a menace to Israel, to the region and clearly a menace to the entire world.” Tehran has been in talks over its disputed nuclear programme with the P5+1 group, which is made up of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council — Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States — plus Germany. Israel is campaigning against a deal emerging from the negotiations, which it says would prematurely ease international sanctions on Tehran, before it makes binding commitments to stop enriching uranium. Iran and the P5+1 group of countries are due to meet again in Geneva on Wednesday for a fresh round of talks. http://www.dailynewsegypt.com/2013/11/17/france-will-not-tolerate-nuclear-proliferation-hollande/ (Return to Articles and Documents List) France 24.com – France Iran Says next Nuclear Talks will be 'Difficult' By Agence France-Presse (AFP) 17 November 2013 AFP - Iran said Sunday nuclear talks with world powers this week will be "difficult," as Israel boosted its campaign against a possible deal that would bring Tehran some sanctions relief. Negotiations between Iran and the so-called P5+1 -- Britain, France, the United States, Russia and China plus Germany -- restart in Geneva on Wednesday after the last round failed to seal a deal. Top diplomats insisted they were closing in on an interim agreement that would see Iran curb or freeze parts of its nuclear programme for some relief from crippling sanctions. But senior Iranian negotiator Abbas Araqchi, who is also deputy foreign minister, said "the next round of nuclear talks will be difficult," according to remarks carried by the official IRNA news agency. "No agreement will be reached without securing the rights of the Iranian nation" on its nuclear programme and uranium enrichment, he added. Israel and the West suspect Iran is pursuing a nuclear weapons capability alongside its uranium enrichment programme, which Tehran insists is entirely peaceful. Israel has argued that Western powers can get a better deal if they maintain or even ratchet up the sanctions, which have exacted a heavy toll on Iran's economy. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who welcomed French President Francois Hollande to Israel on Sunday, said he would also discuss the matter with US Secretary of State John Kerry in Jerusalem on Friday. "I hope we'll be able to convince our friends this week and in the following days to get a much better deal. It can be achieved," he said in a statement. "Continuing to apply pressure (on Iran) and even increasing it can yield a much better diplomatic result." Issue No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 70 Years of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
    IT IS 5 MINUTES TO MIDNIGHT ® Feature Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 2015, Vol. 71(1) 13–25 ! The Author(s) 2015 Reprints and permissions: American scientists as sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0096340214563679 public citizens: 70 years http://thebulletin.sagepub.com of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists David Kaiser and Benjamin Wilson Abstract For seven decades, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists has served as a discussion forum for urgent issues at the intersection of science, technology, and society. Born in the aftermath of World War II and a roiling debate over the control of the postwar atom, the Bulletin has been a sounding board for major nuclear-age debates, from atomic espionage to missile defense. Since the end of the Cold War, the magazine has featured an expanding array of challenges, including the threat posed by global climate change. The BulletinÕs contributors have expressed their public citizenship by helping to bring the political aspects of science into proper focus. They have stood up for the political freedom of science, and sought to harness scientific knowledge to respon- sible ends in the political arena. Such efforts are needed now, as they were in 1945. Keywords Atomic Scientists of Chicago, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Cold War history, Edward Teller, Eugene Rabinowitch, Federation of American Scientists, Hans Bethe, House Committee on Un-American Activities, Robert Oppenheimer, Ruth Adams t has been 70 years since a group The goals of their new organization and calling itself the ÒAtomic Scientists of their new journal were, as the first issue of I ChicagoÓ issued its first dispatch.
    [Show full text]
  • South-North Dialogue in Korea
    GPRN 11-1250000-000103-14 South-North Dialogue in Korea No. 76 (February 2013 ~ December 2013) Special Office for Inter-Korean Dialogue Ministry of Unification South-North Dialogue in Korea No. 76 (February 2013 ~ December 2013) Special Office for Inter-Korean Dialogue Ministry of Unification Contents Chapter I. Overview 7 Chapter II. Inter-Korean Political Dialogue 17 1. ­Working-Level Meetings for Inter-Korean Authorities’ Talks 17 2. Collapse of Inter-Korean Authorities’ Talks 24 Chapter III. Inter-Korean Economic Dialogue 29 1. ­Inter-Korean Authorities’ Talks for the GIC 29 A. The 1st Inter-Korean Working-Level Talks for the GIC 29 B. The 2nd Inter-Korean Working-Level Talks for the GIC 34 C. The 3rd Inter-Korean Working-Level Talks for the GIC 36 D. The 4th Inter-Korean Working-Level Talks for the GIC 38 E. The 5th Inter-Korean Working-Level Talks for the GIC 40 F. The 6th Inter-Korean Working-Level Talks for the GIC 42 G. The 7th Inter-Korean Working-Level Talks for the GIC 45 2. ­South-North Joint Committee Meetings for the GIC 48 A. The 1st Joint Committee Meeting for the GIC 48 B. The 2nd Joint Committee Meeting for the GIC 53 C. The 3rd Joint Committee Meeting for the GIC 56 D. The 4th Joint Committee Meeting for the GIC 60 3. ­South-North Joint Subcommittee Meetings for the GIC 63 A. Joint Subcommittee for the 3Cs 63 B. Joint Subcommittee for Entry, Exit and Stay 65 C.­ ­Joint Subcommittee for Investment Protection, Management and Operation 67 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Wen Ho Lee Case Study1
    Wen Ho Lee Case Study1 In the 1990s as the Clinton administration sought to expand diplomatic and trade relations with China, Chinese espionage against US technology targets–especially nuclear weapons data at national laboratories–was getting widespread publicity in the media. As charges and counter- charges floated in the air, scientists at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) who were studying Chinese nuclear tests concluded that a 1992 test demonstrated a sudden advance in miniaturization of the country’s nuclear warheads. They argued that the warhead was very similar to the United States’ most advanced weapon, the W-88. With this advance, the Chinese had access to the technology that provided the basis of a modern, nuclear force. Robert M. Henson, a weapons designer at LANL, believed that the only way the Chinese could have made such advances was by stealing US secrets. Henson’s view was seconded by John L. Richter, a bomb designer who specialized in creating the trigger for the hydrogen bomb. He argued that the sketchy evidence available pointed to the Chinese having acquired significant data on the trigger in the W-88. Investigators believed that the theft of the W-88 data from the national laboratories occurred in the 1980s, and that there was evidence of ongoing Chinese espionage at the increasingly open national labs in the 1990s. Counterintelligence officials report that China is aggressive at collecting information on US advanced technology. Beijing employs both soft and mostly legal as well as classic, hard-spying techniques to gain access to critical information. While the Chinese approach all scientists, they focus on ethnic Chinese, both from the mainland and from Taiwan.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement from Merrill Newman Dated December 9, 2013 Over the Past
    Statement from Merrill Newman dated December 9, 2013 Over the past two days, I've been able to reunite with my wonderful family, rest, and try to recover from the difficult ordeal that began when I was prevented from leaving North Korea on October 26th. I can't begin to tell you how good it is to be home, to be free, and to begin to resume my normal home life. Let me repeat my thanks to the U.S. State Department for the amazing job they did in getting me out of North Korea and bringing me home safely. I want to thank Vice President Biden, who called me in Beijing to wish me well and even offered to give me a lift back to the United States on his plane. Thanks also to the Swedish Embassy in Pyongyang for their great work, especially their visit to me and their help in ensuring that I had the medicine I needed. Let me also express deep appreciation to friends, family, members of the First Congregational Church, wonderful people of faith and from all walks of life, residents and staff of our home at Channing House, and Members of Congress for their prayers, vigils, hard work, and moral support on my behalf. I want to single out Evans Revere for his extraordinary help. It wasn't until I got home on Saturday that I realized what a story I had become in the press here. During my detention I had no access to any outside news, and wondered whether anyone was even aware of my situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Koreachairmonitor Dec 5 to Dec 18.Pub
    December 5 - 18, 2013 The Korea Chair team takes a biweekly look back at events of interest in Washington, Seoul, and the region. U.S.-KOREA RELATIONS ROK Vice Foreign Minister Visits the United States Vice Foreign Minister Kim Kyou-hyun of the Republic of Korea (ROK) arrived in Washington on December 16 for annual strategic defense talks with high-level U.S. officials. Vice Foreign Minister Kim met with Deputy Secretary of State William Burns on December 17 to discuss the evolving security situation with North Korea, China’s ex- panded air defense identification zone (ADIZ), and Japan’s pursuit of the right of collective self-defense. Allies Conclude Ninth Round of SMA Negotiations The ninth round of negotiations for the Special Measures Agreement (SMA) to determine how the United States and South Korea will share the cost of maintaining U.S. troops on the peninsula began in Vice President Biden Meets with President Park Seoul on December 11 and ended without agreement on December Vice President Joe Biden concluded his week‐long 17. Senior Adviser for Security Negotiations and Agreements Eric tour of Asia with a visit to South Korea, where he met John was on hand to meet with Ambassador for Defense Burden- with President Park Geun‐hye on December 6 at sharing Hwang Joon-kook. The current SMA expires at the end of Cheong Wa Dae to discuss bilateral alliance issues, 2013 but officials have agreed to extend negotiations into 2014. geopolical concerns, and the current controversy South Korea-U.S. Defense, Alliance Talks surrounding China’s recently expanded air defense The United States and South Korea held mid-December bilateral idenficaon zone (ADIZ).
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin 131201 (PDF Edition)
    RAO BULLETIN 1 December 2013 PDF Edition THIS BULLETIN CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING ARTICLES Pg Article Subject | *D0D* | 03 == DoD 2014 Budget [05] -------- (CBO Provides Options for Congress) 04 == DoD Benefit Cuts [23] ------------------- (Who Moved the Goal Post?) 05 == DoD Benefit Cuts [24] -------- (CBO Vet Deficit Reduction Options) 07 == DoD Benefit Cuts [25] -- (Conus Commissary Closing Plan Request) 08 == DoD Benefit Cuts [26] ----------- (Stars & Stripes/Pentagon Channel) 09 == DoD Audits ----- (Pentagon's Bosses Thwart Accurate DFAS Audit) 12 == DoD Medical Countermeasures -- (DoD Duplicating Effort by HHS) 13 == DoD Project Paperclip Lawsuit [02] ----- ( Case Heads to 9th Circuit) 14 == DoD Mobilized Reserve 20 NOV 2013 ---------- (Decrease of 2,344) 14 == DoD/VA Seamless Transition [19] ---- (Program Sputtered to a Halt) 15 == UN Disability Treaty ------------------ (DoD/VA Secretaries Endorse) 16 == Whistleblower Defense Hotline Program -- (31K Contacts Last Year) 17 == Arlington National Cemetery [45] --- (Section 60 Memento Dispute) 17 == NDAA 2014 [04] ------ (Senate Acts on Military's 2014 Budget Bill) 18 == BRAC [34] ---------------- (Officials Say DoD Needs More Closures) | *VA* | 19 == VA Burial Benefit [28] --- (S.1471 Approved and Passed to House) 19 == VA Loans [09] ------------------------------------------- (Practical Uses) 20 == VA Health Care Utilization -- (OEF/OIF/OND Vet Usage Reports) 21 == VA Facility Use (PTSD) ----- (Recent Veterans with PTSD Report) 22 == VA ID Card [02] ----------------------- (Susceptible to Identity Theft) 22 == VA Advance Funding [02] ----- (HVAC/SVAC Move on Approval) 23 == VA Fraud, Waste & Abuse [82] --- (Reported 15 thru 30 Nov 2013) 24 == VAMC Top Performers ------------ (32 Named in TJC 2013 Report) 25 == VAMC Augusta GA --------(Gastrointestinal Program Turnaround) 27 == VAMC Columbia SC [01] -- (Delays & Dust at Hospital Resolved) 27 == VAMC Jackson MS [01] ---- (Congressional Hearing on Problems) 29 == VAMC St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons As Jus Cogens
    CMT 4 - THE NON-PROLIFERATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS - NORMILE (DO NOT DELETE) 10/22/2019 4:56 PM The Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons as Jus Cogens Gaela Normile* ABSTRACT As a result of the Manhattan Project, a secret nuclear weapons program in 1946, the United States became the first nation in the world to secure a nuclear weapon. Although the United States’ nuclear weapon resulted in an international desire to attain similar capabilities, the leading scientists of the Manhattan Project released a somber statement that first reflected the destructive nature of nuclear weapons. The Manhattan Project scientists warned that a “grave danger lies ahead” if the issues associated with the weapon were not “carefully analyzed and discussed with competent authorities.” The statement released by the Manhattan Project scientists was the first express statement made about the dangers that accompany nuclear weapons and, incidentally, nuclear proliferation. The scientists’ grave prediction came to fruition one month later, when two nuclear bombs killed over 250,000 Japanese civilians in Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II. After the World War II nuclear bombings, the Soviet Union secured a nuclear weapon followed by the United Kingdom, France, and China. Fearing further proliferation and possible catastrophic results if the nuclear bomb fell into the wrong hands, the international community began to heed to the Manhattan Project scientists’ warnings by carefully analyzing and discussing nuclear non-proliferation. International discussions led to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) in 1970. Currently, the NPT is the largest binding arms and limitation agreement as 191 out of 193 States are party to the treaty.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Physics Instrumentation in Norway: 1933–1955
    The Global and the Local: The History of Science and the Cultural Integration of Europe. nd Proceedings of the 2 ICESHS (Cracow, Poland, September 6–9, 2006) / Ed. by M. Kokowski. Roland Wittje * Nuclear physics instrumentation in Norway: 1933–1955 THROUGH THE LATE 1940s and the 1950s, nuclear scientists, technologists and administrators in Norway were deeply split about the nation's goals, organisation, politics, and — essentially related to this — research instrumentation for nuclear science. One faction was determined to build Norway’s first nuclear reactor, while another did not want a reactor at all. Whereas the first faction consisted of statesmen of science and research technologists, the second comprised academic scientist, most of whom had started their research career in nuclear physics in the 1930s. In order to understand this conflict, I will follow the development of research and instrumentation in nuclear physics both inside and outside Norway from the early 1930s to the mid-1950s. This period covers the time when scientists and engineers started to develop large-scale research instrumentation for nuclear physics research, followed by wartime experience and the American, British and German nuclear weapon projects, and ends with the beginning of the Cold War. The onset of the Cold War was characterised by secrecy in nuclear technology, the rise of the military-industrial-academic complex, particularly in the USA, and the beginning of European large-scale scientific co-operations. My overview will begin with early design and construction of particle accelerators by Odd Dahl and Rolf Widerøe, and follow the building of the first accelerator in Trondheim in the mid-1930s, the involvement of Norwegian scientists and engineers in wartime research and nuclear espionage and the post-war accelerator programs at the Norwegian universities.
    [Show full text]
  • China: Suspected Acquisition of U.S
    Order Code RL30143 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web China: Suspected Acquisition of U.S. Nuclear Weapon Secrets Updated February 1, 2006 Shirley A. Kan Specialist in National Security Policy Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress China: Suspected Acquisition of U.S. Nuclear Weapon Secrets Summary This CRS Report discusses China’s suspected acquisition of U.S. nuclear weapon secrets, including that on the W88, the newest U.S. nuclear warhead. This serious controversy became public in early 1999 and raised policy issues about whether U.S. security was further threatened by China’s suspected use of U.S. nuclear weapon secrets in its development of nuclear forces, as well as whether the Administration’s response to the security problems was effective or mishandled and whether it fairly used or abused its investigative and prosecuting authority. The Clinton Administration acknowledged that improved security was needed at the weapons labs but said that it took actions in response to indications in 1995 that China may have obtained U.S. nuclear weapon secrets. Critics in Congress and elsewhere argued that the Administration was slow to respond to security concerns, mishandled the too narrow investigation, downplayed information potentially unfavorable to China and the labs, and failed to notify Congress fully. On April 7, 1999, President Clinton gave his assurance that partly “because of our engagement, China has, at best, only marginally increased its deployed nuclear threat in the last 15 years” and that the strategic balance with China “remains overwhelmingly in our favor.” On April 21, 1999, Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) George Tenet, reported the Intelligence Community’s damage assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Espionage and Intelligence Gathering Other Books in the Current Controversies Series
    Espionage and Intelligence Gathering Other books in the Current Controversies series: The Abortion Controversy Issues in Adoption Alcoholism Marriage and Divorce Assisted Suicide Medical Ethics Biodiversity Mental Health Capital Punishment The Middle East Censorship Minorities Child Abuse Nationalism and Ethnic Civil Liberties Conflict Computers and Society Native American Rights Conserving the Environment Police Brutality Crime Politicians and Ethics Developing Nations Pollution The Disabled Prisons Drug Abuse Racism Drug Legalization The Rights of Animals Drug Trafficking Sexual Harassment Ethics Sexually Transmitted Diseases Family Violence Smoking Free Speech Suicide Garbage and Waste Teen Addiction Gay Rights Teen Pregnancy and Parenting Genetic Engineering Teens and Alcohol Guns and Violence The Terrorist Attack on Hate Crimes America Homosexuality Urban Terrorism Illegal Drugs Violence Against Women Illegal Immigration Violence in the Media The Information Age Women in the Military Interventionism Youth Violence Espionage and Intelligence Gathering Louise I. Gerdes, Book Editor Daniel Leone,President Bonnie Szumski, Publisher Scott Barbour, Managing Editor Helen Cothran, Senior Editor CURRENT CONTROVERSIES San Diego • Detroit • New York • San Francisco • Cleveland New Haven, Conn. • Waterville, Maine • London • Munich © 2004 by Greenhaven Press. Greenhaven Press is an imprint of The Gale Group, Inc., a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Greenhaven® and Thomson Learning™ are trademarks used herein under license. For more information, contact Greenhaven Press 27500 Drake Rd. Farmington Hills, MI 48331-3535 Or you can visit our Internet site at http://www.gale.com ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this work covered by the copyright hereon may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means—graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, Web distribution or information storage retrieval systems—without the written permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reevaluation of the Damage Done to the United States by Soviet Espionage April Pickens James Madison University
    James Madison Undergraduate Research Journal Volume 4 | Issue 1 2016-2017 A Reevaluation of the Damage Done to the United States by Soviet Espionage April Pickens James Madison University Follow this and other works at: http://commons.lib.jmu.edu/jmurj Recommended Chicago Citation Pickens, April. “A Reevaluation of the Damage Done to the United States by Soviet Espionage". James Madison Undergraduate Research Journal 4, no. 1 (2017): 56-64, accessed Month day, year. http:// commons.lib.jmu.edu/jmurj/vol4/iss1/5. This full issue is brought to you for free and open access by JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in James Madison Undergraduate Research Journal by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JMURJ Popular opinion and many historians portray the effects of Soviet espionage on the ABSTRACT United States as disastrous. Although covert Soviet efforts undeniably harmed America, their extent and gravity has been greatly exaggerated. This paper evaluates primary and secondary sources on the subject to strike a delicate balance between minimizing and inflating the effects of Soviet activities. It acknowledges that espionage did some damage, but questions the legal status, extent, and effect of much of the Soviets’ “stolen” information, ultimately arguing that most Soviet espionage was actually more harmful to the Soviet Union than to the United States. RUSSIAN COLONEL IS INDICTED Any argument downplaying covert Soviet endeavors HERE AS TOP SPY IN U.S.1 must begin with an admission that some espionage unquestionably led to detrimental consequences for CHIEF ‘RUSSIAN SPY’ the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • (CUWS) Outreach Journal # 1280
    Issue No. 1280 8 September 2017 // USAFCUWS Outreach Journal Issue 1280 // Feature Item “U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues”. Written by Amy F. Woolf, published by the Congressional Research Service; August 8 2017 https://fas.org/sgp/crs/nuke/RL33640.pdf Even though the United States is in the process of reducing the number of warheads deployed on its long-range missiles and bombers, consistent with the terms of the New START Treaty, it also plans to develop new delivery systems for deployment over the next 20-30 years. The 115th Congress will continue to review these programs, and the funding requested for them, during the annual authorization and appropriations process. During the Cold War, the U.S. nuclear arsenal contained many types of delivery vehicles for nuclear weapons. The longer-range systems, which included long-range missiles based on U.S. territory, long-range missiles based on submarines, and heavy bombers that could threaten Soviet targets from their bases in the United States, are known as strategic nuclear delivery vehicles. At the end of the Cold War, in 1991, the United States deployed more than 10,000 warheads on these delivery vehicles. That number has declined to less than 1,500 deployed warheads today, and is slated to be 1,550 deployed warheads in 2018, after the New START Treaty completes implementation. At the present time, the U.S. land-based ballistic missile force (ICBMs) consists of 400 landbased Minuteman III ICBMs, each deployed with one warhead. The fleet has declined to 400 deployed missiles, while retaining 450 launchers, to meet the terms of the New START Treaty.
    [Show full text]