DOCSLIB.ORG

Downloaded from Csx.Sagepub.Com at UNIV MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST on February 18, 2013 748 Critical-Retrospective Essays

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Downloaded from Csx.Sagepub.Com at UNIV MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST on February 18, 2013 748 Critical-Retrospective Essays University of Massachusetts Amherst From the SelectedWorks of Dan Clawson 2012 Labor in Struggle Dan Clawson, University of Massachusetts - Amherst Available at: https://works.bepress.com/dan_clawson/15/ Critical-Retrospective Essays 747 References Merrill, Francis E. and Carroll D. Clark. 1934. Gideonse, Harry D. 1934. ‘‘Money and Finance,’’ ‘‘The Money Market as a Special Public,’’ American Journal of Sociology 39(6): 749–758. American Journal of Sociology 39(5): 626–636. MacKenzie, Donald. 2011. ‘‘The Credit Crisis as Merrill, Francis E. and Melchior Palyi. 1938. ‘‘The a Problem in the Sociology of Knowledge,’’ Stock Exchange and Social Control,’’ American American Journal of Sociology 116(6): 1778–1841. Journal of Sociology 43(4): 560–577. Labor in Struggle DAN CLAWSON University of Massachusetts [email protected] Reviving the Strike: How Working People Collision Course: Ronald Reagan, the Air Can Regain Power and Transform America, Traffic Controllers, and the Strike that by Joe Burns. Brooklyn, NY: Ig Changed America , by Joseph A. Publishing, 2011. 206pp. $15.95 paper. McCartin. New York, NY: Oxford ISBN: 9781935439240. University Press, 2011. 472pp. $29.95 cloth. ISBN: 9780199836789. Organizing at the Margins: The Symbolic Politics of Labor in South Korea and the L.A. Story: Immigrant Workers and the United States , by Jennifer Jihye Chun. Future of the U.S. Labor Movement , by Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, 2009. 221pp. Ruth Milkman. New York, NY: Russell $35.00 cloth. ISBN: 9780801447112. Sage Foundation, 2006. 244pp. $24.95 paper. ISBN 9780871546357. The Next Upsurge: Labor and the New Social Movements , by Dan Clawson. The Broken Table: The Detroit Newspaper Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, 2003. 235pp. Strike and the State of American Labor , by $21.95 paper. ISBN: 9780801488702. Chris Rhomberg. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, 2012. 387pp. The Civil Wars in U.S. Labor: Birth of a New $47.50 paper. ISBN: 9780871547170. Workers’ Movement or Death Throes of the Old? , by Steve Early. Chicago, IL: Beyond the Boycott: Labor Rights, Human Haymarket Books, 2011. 409pp. $17.00 Rights, and Transnational Activism , by paper. ISBN: 9781608460991. Gay Seidman. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, 2007. 176pp. $18.95 Why David Sometimes Wins: Leadership, paper. ISBN: 9780871547613. Organization, and Strategy in the California Farm Worker Movement , by Marshall Forces of Labor: Workers’ Movements and Ganz. New York, NY: Oxford Globalization since 1870 , by Beverly J. University Press, 2009. 344pp. $34.95 Silver. New York, NY: Cambridge cloth. ISBN: 9780195162011. University Press, 2003. 238pp. $31.00 paper. ISBN: 97805215207795. Reorganizing the Rust Belt: An Inside Study of the American Labor Movement , by Power in Coalition: Strategies for Strong Steven Henry Lopez. Berkeley, CA: Unions and Social Change , by Amanda University of California Press, 2004. Tattersall. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, 2010. 292pp. $26.95 paper. ISBN: 9780520235656. 209pp. $21.00 paper. ISBN: 9780801476068. Raising Expectations: How American Workers Can Win (And Why They Don’t) , by Jane McAlevey , with Bob Ostertag. New York, NY: Verso, forthcoming 2012. Contemporary Sociology 41, 6 Downloaded from csx.sagepub.com at UNIV MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST on February 18, 2013 748 Critical-Retrospective Essays The editor gave me a very general charge: struggles within labor over what kind of choose a dozen books on labor, published union to aim for and how to get there. In in the new millennium, and write about some sense underlying all this, but until them. Since I can name perhaps three dozen recently largely absent from consideration, books I would like to include, a selection cri- has been the disappearance of strikes. terion is key. In most circumstances, for sociologists as well as others, the term ‘‘labor’’ evokes first Pure Organizing or Structural and foremost the labor process, the work Conditions? people do, whether that be carework, assem- For perhaps twenty years beginning around bly line production, professional careers, or 1990, the U.S. labor movement’s analysis of housework. But in this essay ‘‘labor,’’ as I the key to victory was organizing enough use the term, focuses on work-related workers to achieve a high level of ‘‘union groups that seek to transform society, in big density,’’ the proportion of all workers who or small ways, by bringing people together, were members of unions. There is good rea- developing their capacities, and using the son for a focus on density: studies show that solidarity of many individuals, each of if only one in ten workers in a sector are them weak if standing alone, to mobilize organized, then the union cannot win power and contest existing arrangements. much, or if it does win, the employer will This essay covers only books that fit that cri- constantly be at war with the union and terion, and by no means all of those works. looking for ways to move the operation or The confusion between these two senses outsource key components. On the other of labor is sometimes helpful, sometimes hand, if ninety percent of a sector is orga- a problem. At my home institution, the Uni- nized, not only do employers find it more versity of Massachusetts Amherst, the hith- difficult to displace the union, but also paying erto free-standing Labor Center was forced decent wages and benefits is just a cost of to merge with a department, and it chose doing business, and is no longer a competitive sociology. I very much hope that when the disadvantage. As a result, unions can do the chancellor or provost hears ‘‘labor center’’ most to improve conditions, and are in the they subliminally think it is about work most secure position, if they can achieve tout cours . The problem however, is that high density within a particular sector. 2 (The many of my colleagues subliminally think relevant sector for leverage might be down- the same way, and would be happy to have town hotels in San Francisco; workers and the Labor Center be a site for the study of the union would not need ninety percent work conditions, of the ways work is orga- density for hotels in the nation as a whole.) nized and changes, the workplace as a site During the last two decades studies of to study a range of issues. Such people— organizing were central to labor scholarship and I suspect it is not just my colleagues, as well as to the labor movement. The AFL- but many members of the ASA Labor and CIO itself sponsored three edited volumes Labor Movements section—want to see (not reviewed here) and each focused on a sympathy-for-the-victims standpoint. But organizing. Within that larger focus, some they have trouble understanding why I and scholarship focused on exemplary cases others jealously guard the special character and on principles that would apply to of a Labor Center as a site to focus on the vari- more-or-less any organizing at any time, ety of ways workers and their supporters while other scholarship emphasized the organize for transformation (whether or not importance of structural conditions, with they do so through a traditional union), of the ways people stop being (just) victims 2 See Laura Dresser and Annette Bernhardt. and assume agency in collective struggle. 2006. ‘‘Bad Service Jobs: Can Unions Save This essay looks at some of the ways that Them? Can They Save Unions?’’ Pp. 115–37 scholarship has changed in recent years, in R. Block, S. Friedman, M. Kaminski and A. Levin, eds., Justice on the Job: Perspectives on from a focus on what (if anything) can be the Erosion of Collective Bargaining in the United done to improve traditional union organiz- States . Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute ing, to alternative ways to exercise power, to for Employment Research. Contemporary Sociology 41, 6 Downloaded from csx.sagepub.com at UNIV MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST on February 18, 2013 Critical-Retrospective Essays 749 the implicit or explicit argument that not all draws on an impressive database that aims things were possible at all times. In the to cover all strikes and labor activity from 1990s, work by Kate Bronfenbrenner (some 1870 through the 1990s to argue that what of it with Tom Juravich), using a pure- is possible is structurally determined. Labor organizing approach, had a major impact unrest is greatest during periods of capital on (some parts of) the labor movement. inflow. The characteristic form of struggle Quantitative studies of a sample of organiz- varies by the structure of the industry. Con- ing campaigns showed that no single tactic sider the auto industry: unrest shifts from was a magic bullet, but campaigns were far the United States and Canada in the 1930s, more likely to succeed if they employed to Western Europe in the 1960s, to Italy, a range of rank-and-file intensive tactics. Spain, and Argentina in the 1970s, to Brazil, Even if there were no changes in labor law, South Africa, South Korea, and Mexico in globalization, or politics, labor could sub- the 1990s (and we might add, to China stantially increase its victories if it ran the today). Each country’s struggle is unique— right kind of campaigns. 3 but in country after country, due to the Why David Sometimes Wins by Marshall tightly-linked character of auto production, Ganz provides another example of a focus the union is brought in through action by on pure organizing, using the 1960s Farm- a militant minority at a choke point in the workers, a union in which Ganz was a key system. Those tactics work in auto, and are participant, to develop a general theory of independently invented again and again, organizing. Ganz argues that the Farm- but they would not work in textiles. That workers succeeded in significant part is, the success of worker struggles does not because their leadership devised a stream just depend on injustice, or even worker mil- of effective strategy, strategy which came itance, but in a significant part on strategic from relying on a leadership team, and position and the ability to exert leverage.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Public Sociology
    PUBLIC SOCIOLOGY Public Sociology Fifteen Eminent Sociologists Debate Politics and the Profession in the Twenty-first Century EDITED BY Dan Clawson, Robert Zussman, Joya Misra, Naomi Gerstel, Randall Stokes, Douglas L. Anderton, and Michael Burawoy UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS Berkeley Los Angeles London All royalties from the sale of this book are donated to the American Sociological Association Minority Fel- lowship Fund. University of California Press, one of the most distin- guished university presses in the United States, enriches lives around the world by advancing scholarship in the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences. Its activities are supported by the UC Press Foundation and by philanthropic contributions from individuals and institutions. For more information, visit www.ucpress.edu. University of California Press Berkeley and Los Angeles, California University of California Press, Ltd. London, England © 2007 by The Regents of the University of California Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Public sociology : ideas, arguments, and visions for the future / edited by Dan Clawson . [et al.]. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-520-25137-3 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-520-25137-7 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-13: 978-0-520-25138-0 (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-520-25138-5 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Sociology—Methodology. 2. Sociology— Philosophy. 3. Applied sociology. I. Clawson, Dan. hm511.p83 2007 301—dc22 2006023163 Manufactured in the United States of America 15 14 13 12 11 10 09 08 07 10987654321 This book is printed on New Leaf EcoBook 50, a 100% recycled fiber of which 50% is de-inked post- consumer waste, processed chlorine-free.
    [Show full text]
  • Centennial Bibliography on the History of American Sociology
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Sociology Department, Faculty Publications Sociology, Department of 2005 Centennial Bibliography On The iH story Of American Sociology Michael R. Hill [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub Part of the Family, Life Course, and Society Commons, and the Social Psychology and Interaction Commons Hill, Michael R., "Centennial Bibliography On The iH story Of American Sociology" (2005). Sociology Department, Faculty Publications. 348. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub/348 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Sociology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology Department, Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Hill, Michael R., (Compiler). 2005. Centennial Bibliography of the History of American Sociology. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association. CENTENNIAL BIBLIOGRAPHY ON THE HISTORY OF AMERICAN SOCIOLOGY Compiled by MICHAEL R. HILL Editor, Sociological Origins In consultation with the Centennial Bibliography Committee of the American Sociological Association Section on the History of Sociology: Brian P. Conway, Michael R. Hill (co-chair), Susan Hoecker-Drysdale (ex-officio), Jack Nusan Porter (co-chair), Pamela A. Roby, Kathleen Slobin, and Roberta Spalter-Roth. © 2005 American Sociological Association Washington, DC TABLE OF CONTENTS Note: Each part is separately paginated, with the number of pages in each part as indicated below in square brackets. The total page count for the entire file is 224 pages. To navigate within the document, please use navigation arrows and the Bookmark feature provided by Adobe Acrobat Reader.® Users may search this document by utilizing the “Find” command (typically located under the “Edit” tab on the Adobe Acrobat toolbar).
    [Show full text]
  • Obituary Dan Clawson
    Obituary Dan Clawson (1948-2019) Ruth Milkman, City University of New York, United States of America Dan Clawson, who served as RC44’s Vice President from 2006 to 2010, died suddenly on 7 May 2019 of a heart attack. He was a prolific labour sociologist, and a brilliant, tireless organiser with an unwavering commitment to social justice. He came of age in the late 1960s and was indelibly marked by the New Left. Dedication to participatory democracy, feminism and progressive politics permeated his scholarship, his activism, as well as his personal conduct over the years. He had truly extraordinary leadership abilities, and yet was utterly unpretentious – a rare soul who never craved personal recognition. Dan had a habit of creating new organisations, even if he was reluctant to take credit for doing so. He was a founding member of the American Sociological Association’s section on Labor and Labor Movements, which he went on to chair in 2004–2005. Earlier, he had helped to create Scholars, Artists and Writers for Social Justice, a group whose mission was to strengthen ties between intellectuals and the labour movement; he served as its national chair in 1998–1999. He also was a founder of the Public Higher Education Network of Massachusetts and of a progressive caucus in the Massachusetts teachers’ union. Dan had wide-ranging intellectual interests and published a rich body of rigorous, first-class scholarship. The research questions he chose to pursue were not narrow ones of interest only to specialists; instead he consistently aimed to illuminate critical political and social issues.
    [Show full text]
  • The Power of Capital: an Introduction to Class, Domination, and Conflict
    The Power of Capital: An Introduction to Class, Domination, and Conflict By Alejandro Reuss An ECI Teaching Module on Social and Environmental Issues in Economics Global Development Policy Center Boston University 53 Bay State Road Boston, MA 02155 bu.edu/gdp Economics in Context Initiative, Global Development Policy Center, Boston University, 2020. Permission is hereby granted for instructors to copy this module for instructional purposes. Suggested citation: Reuss, Alejandro. (2020) “The Power of Capital: An Introduction to Class, Domination, and Conflict.” An ECI Teaching Module on Social and Economic Issues, Economics in Context Initiative, Global Development Policy Center, Boston University, 2020. Students may also download the module directly from: http://www.bu.edu/eci/education-materials/teaching-modules/ Comments and feedback from course use are welcomed: Economics in Context Initiative Global Development Policy Center Boston University 53 Bay State Road Boston, MA 02215 http://www.bu.edu/eci/ Email: [email protected] NOTE – terms denoted in bold face are defined in the KEY TERMS AND CONCEPTS section at the end of the module. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Economics and Power Relations ........................................................................................... 3 1.2 Outline of the Module ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Participation in Local Union Leadership: the Massachusetts Experience Author(S): Dale Melcher, Jennifer L
    University of Massachusetts Amherst From the SelectedWorks of Dan Clawson January, 1992 Women's Participation in Local Union Leadership: The asM sachusetts Experience Dale Melcher Jennifer L. Eichstedt Shelley Eriksen Dan Clawson, University of Massachusetts - Amherst Available at: https://works.bepress.com/dan_clawson/19/ Women's Participation in Local Union Leadership: The Massachusetts Experience Author(s): Dale Melcher, Jennifer L. Eichstedt, Shelley Eriksen and Dan Clawson Source: Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 45, No. 2 (Jan., 1992), pp. 267-280 Published by: Cornell University, School of Industrial & Labor Relations Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2524834 . Accessed: 31/07/2013 11:50 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Cornell University, School of Industrial & Labor Relations is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Industrial and Labor Relations Review. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.119.169.202 on Wed, 31 Jul 2013 11:50:59 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions WOMEN'S PARTICIPATION IN LOCAL UNION LEADERSHIP: THE MASSACHUSETTS EXPERIENCE DALE MELCHER, JENNIFER L. EICHSTEDT, SHELLEY ERIKSEN, and DAN CLAWSON* A 1989 survey of leaders of a sample of Massachusetts AFL- CIO-affiliated union locals indicates that although women are repre- sented in these union locals' leadershipin numbersnearly proportional to the femalepercentage of membership,they are under-representedin the mostinfluential positions.
    [Show full text]
  • In Critical Solidarity Newsletter of the Labor and Labor Movements Section American Sociological Association Vol
    In Critical Solidarity Newsletter of the Labor and Labor Movements Section American Sociological Association Vol. 3, No. 3 December 2003 Section Officers Chair: Ruth Milkman [email protected] Past Chair: Kim Voss [email protected] Chair Elect: Dan Clawson ([email protected] ) Secretary-Treasurer: Heidi Gottfried [email protected] Council: Jill Esbenshade ([email protected] ) Harland Prechel ([email protected] ) Daisy Rooks ([email protected] ) Joel Stillerman ([email protected] ) Webmaster: George Mason web address: http://www.laborstudies.wayne.edu/ASA/ Author Meets Critic: Forces of Labor Edited by Heidi Gottfried Wayne State University This Author Meets Critic section features Beverly Silver’s new book, Forces of Labor: Workers’ Movements and Globalization since 1870, published by Cambridge University Press, 2003 ($23.00 paper). Reviews by Michael Burawoy, Ching Kwan Lee and Ian Robinson, and a rejoinder by Beverly Silver, raise issues of central importance Newsletter Contents Author Meets Critics: Beverly Silver’s Forces of Production Heidi Gottfried, editor’s Introduction, p. 1 Michael Burawoy: Where Next for Labor?, p. 2 Ching Kwan Lee: Beyond Historical Capitalism, p. 4 Ian Robinson: Race to the Bottom?, p. 6 Beverly Silver: Rejoinder, p. 8 ASA 2004 convention sessions, p. 3 Awards Nominations solicited Distinguished Scholarly Article, p. 5 Best Student Paper, p.7 New journal announcement, p. 10 Past Chair’s report, Kim Voss, p. 11 Chair’s report, Ruth Milkman, p. 11 New books by section members, p. 12 Newsletter editor: Dan Clawson ([email protected] ) not only to the study of labor, but also to debates over the future of labor movements and the prospects for workers’ transnational solidarity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Turn to Public Sociology: the Case of U.S. Labor Studies
    THE TURN TO PUBLIC SOCIOLOGY: THE CASE OF U.S. LABOR STUDIES. 1 Michael Burawoy N the US, 1974 marked the beginning of a great transformation. In labor studies it was I the year of the publication of Harry Braverman’s Labor and Monopoly Capital , and the launching of a Marxist research program focused on the labor process. Braverman turned away from all subjectivist views of work to proclaim his famous deskilling hypothesis, namely the history of monopoly capitalism was the history of the degradation of work. True or false, it was a decisive break with narrowly conceived industrial sociology and timeless organization theory. 1974 also marked a major recession in the US economy and the onset of an economic and then a political assault on labor that would throw Braverman’s claims into relief. More broadly, this birth of neoliberalism, capitalism’s third wave of marketization, would deeply affect both the labor movement and the focus of academic research. It is the changing relationship among economic and political context, labor movement and labor studies that preoccupies this paper. The rupture with professional sociology marked by Labor and Monopoly Capital , and the research program it inaugurated, was followed by a transition , some 20 years later, from the study of the labor process to an engagement with the labor movement. This transition to public sociology has been one of the more exciting developments in an otherwise heavily professionalized discipline and a generally bleak labor scene. Yet the shift of focus from structure to agency, from process to movement, from a critical- professional sociology to a critical-public sociology of labor occurred in the very period of the labor movement’s greatest decline -- the percentage of the labor force unionized in the private sector fell precipitously from 23.6% in 1974 to 7.4% by 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Neustadtl CV
    Curriculum Vitae Notarization. I have read the following and certify that this curriculum vitae is a current and accurate statement of my professional record. Signature_____________________________________ Date October 17, 2013 Please organize your CV in order of the following: primary headings in bold (e.g. 1. Personal Information), sub-headings in underline (e.g. 1.c. Educational Background), and numbered items within sub-headings (e.g. 2.a.ii Books Edited). In your CV, for uniformity, please use exactly the same headings / sub-headings / numbered items as below. 1. Personal Information a.104423019, Neustadtl, Alan, Department of Sociology, University of Maryland, 301-405-6411 [email protected] b. Current Academic Appointment Alan Neustadtl, Sociology, Associate Professor, year of University, 1993 c. Other Academic Appointments while at UMD d. Educational Background Ph.D. Sociology Department, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 1987. M.A. Sociology Department, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 1982. B.A. Bates College, Lewiston, Maine, 1979. e. Employment Background Appointments prior to UMD 2. Research, Scholarly and Creative Activities For each of the categories listed below follow this guideline: Published works should be listed first, in either chronological order or its inverse, followed (or preceded) by works not yet published but accepted for publicationError! Bookmark not defined.. The individual should distinguish between authored and edited works and between refereed and unrefereed outlets and should clarify the status of unpublished works (e.g. accepted, in press). All authors should be listed in the order they appear on the publication. In exceptional cases, e.g., when the work is a product of a large group (more than 10 authors), not all authors need be listed.
    [Show full text]
  • VITA Dan Clawson
    October 2017 VITA Dan Clawson Office: Home: Social and Demographic Research Institute and Department of Sociology 43 Munroe Street University of Massachusetts Northampton, MA 01060 Amherst, MA 01003 413-586-6235 Fax = 413-545-0746 email = [email protected] Education 1978 Ph.D., State University of New York at Stony Brook 1975 M.A., State University of New York at Stony Brook 1970 B.A., Magna Cum Laude, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri Employment 1990- Professor, Department of Sociology, University of Massachusetts at Amherst 2011-12 Visiting Scholar, Russell Sage Foundation, New York 1984-90 Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, University of Massachusetts at Amherst 1978-84 Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, University of Massachusetts at Amherst Books Dan Clawson and Naomi Gerstel, Unequal Time: Gender, Class, and Family in Employment Schedules. New York: Russell Sage Foundation Press, 2014. Awards won: William J. Goode Distinguished Book Award from the Sociology of the Family Section of the American Sociological Association. Max Weber Distinguished Book award from the Organizations, Occupations, and Work Section of the American Sociological Association. Dan Clawson 2 Distinguished Scholarly Book Award from the Labor and Labor Movements Section of the American Sociological Association. Dan Clawson and Max Page, The Future of Higher Education. New York: Routledge, 2011. Dan Clawson, Robert Zussman, Joya Misra, Naomi Gerstel, Randall Stokes, Douglas Anderton, and Michael Burawoy, editors. Public Sociology: Fifteen Eminent Sociologists Debate Politics & the Profession in the Twenty-First Century. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2007. Essays responding to Michael Burawoy’s 2004 presidential address. In addition to Michael Burawoy, contributors include Andrew Abbott, Patricia Hill Collins, Barbara Ehrenreich, Evelyn Nakano Glenn, Sharon Hays, Douglas Massey, Orlando Patterson, Frances Fox Piven, Lynn Smith-Lovin, Judith Stacey, Arthur Stinchcombe, Alain Touraine, Immanuel Wallerstein, and William Julius Wilson.
    [Show full text]
  • Temple University, Humanities Open Book Program
    Narrative Section of a Successful Application The attached document contains the grant narrative and selected portions of a previously funded grant application. It is not intended to serve as a model, but to give you a sense of how a successful application may be crafted. Every successful application is different, and each applicant is urged to prepare a proposal that reflects its unique project and aspirations. Prospective applicants should consult the Office of Digital Humanities program application guidelines at http://www.neh.gov/grants/odh/humanities-open-book-program for instructions. Applicants are also strongly encouraged to consult with the NEH Office of Digital Humanities staff well before a grant deadline. Note: The attachment only contains the grant narrative and selected portions, not the entire funded application. In addition, certain portions may have been redacted to protect the privacy interests of an individual and/or to protect confidential commercial and financial information and/or to protect copyrighted materials. Project Title: Humanities Open Book Program – Temple University Institution: Temple University Project Director: Annie Katherine Johnson Grant Program: Humanities Open Book Program Stories of Work and the Struggle for Solidarity: Increasing Access to Temple University Press Labor Studies Titles 1. Table of Contents List of Project Participants 2-1 Abstract 3-1 Narrative 4-1 Intellectual Significance of the Collection of Books 4-1 History and Overview of the Publisher 4-2 Dissemination 4-3 Service Provider and Technical Standards 4-4 Work Plan 4-6 Licenses 4-8 Marketing Plan 4-8 Budget 5-1 Résumés 6-1 Letters of Commitment 7-1 List of Books and Other Appendices 8-1 1-1 Stories of Work and the Struggle for Solidarity: Increasing Access to Temple University Press Labor Studies Titles 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Aaron C. Foote Department of Sociology Trinity College N-31 Seabury Hall Hartford CT, 06106 [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D
    Aaron C. Foote Department of Sociology Trinity College N-31 Seabury Hall Hartford CT, 06106 [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Sociology (2021) M.A. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Sociology (2016) B.A. Michigan State University, East Lansing, Social Relations and Policy (2012) AREAS OF INTEREST ▪ Urban Sociology ▪ Environmental Sociology ▪ Neocolonialism ▪ Regional Politics ▪ Qualitative Methods EMPLOYMENT ▪ Visiting Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, Trinity College, (July 2021-Present) ▪ Graduate Teaching Assistant, Department of Sociology, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, (September 2012-May 2021) ▪ Lecturer I, Department of Sociology, Anthropology and Criminal Justice, University of Michigan-Flint (September 2018-September 2019) ▪ Instructor, Department of Sociology, University of Massachusetts-Amherst (Fall 2017-May 2021) ▪ Instructor, Fine Arts and Social Sciences Division, Mott Community College (November 2016-May 2021) RELATED EMPLOYMENT ▪ Project Manager, Michigan State University Center for Regional Economic Innovation (July 2016-July 2017) ▪ TRIO Upward Bound, University of Massachusetts-Amherst (Summer 2015) ▪ Inter-cultural Aide, Office of Cultural and Academic Transitions, Michigan State University (August 2010-May 2011) DISSERTATION COMMITTEE/REFERENCES ▪ Cedric de Leon, Department of Sociology, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, Chair ▪ Mary Ann Clawson, Department of Sociology, Wesleyan University, Member ▪ Agustin Lao-Montes, Department of Sociology,
    [Show full text]
  • The Public Turn
    Work and Occupations Volume 35 Number 4 November 2008 371-387 © 2008 Sage Publications The Public Turn 10.1177/0730888408325125 http://wox.sagepub.com hosted at From Labor Process to http://online.sagepub.com Labor Movement Michael Burawoy University of California, Berkeley The year 1974 marked a rupture in the study of labor. It was the year in which Harry Braverman’s Labor and Monopoly Capital was published, making a break with a moribund industrial sociology. It was a rupture inspired by the resurgence of Marxism, critical of the euphoric sociology of the 1950s. Since 1974, labor studies have undergone a mutation, shifting their focus from the examination of the labor process to an engagement with the labor movement. What explains this in light of the continuing assault on labor and the decline of overall union density? The answer lies with the transformation of the labor movement itself—the demise of the old industrial, business unionism and the growing strength of New Labor with its orientation to the service sector, to immigrant and vulnerable workers, and its invention of novel organizing strategies. In New Labor, sociologists have found a new public. Keywords: labor process; labor movement; public sociology he year 1974 inaugurated a triple mutation in the world of U.S. labor. TIn labor studies, it was the year of the publication of Harry Braverman’s Labor and Monopoly Capital and the launching of a Marxist research program focused on the labor process. Braverman turned away from all subjectivist views of work to proclaim his famous deskilling hypothesis, namely, that the history of monopoly capitalism was the history of the degradation of work.
    [Show full text]