Draft Minute Policy and Resources Committee

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Draft Minute Policy and Resources Committee Page 1135. Minute Policy and Resources Committee Tuesday, 26 November 2019, 10:30. Council Chamber, Council Offices, School Place, Kirkwall. Present Councillors James W Stockan, W Leslie Manson, Stephen G Clackson, Alexander G Cowie, Norman R Craigie, Robin W Crichton, David Dawson, Andrew Drever, Barbara Foulkes, Steven B Heddle, J Harvey Johnston, Rachael A King, John T Richards, Stephen Sankey, John A R Scott, Gwenda M Shearer, Graham L Sinclair, Magnus O Thomson, Owen Tierney, Duncan A Tullock and Kevin F Woodbridge. Clerk • John W Mundell, Interim Chief Executive. In Attendance • Gavin Barr, Executive Director of Development and Infrastructure (for Items 1 to 25). • Gillian Morrison, Executive Director of Corporate Services. • Sally Shaw, Chief Officer/Executive Director, Orkney Health and Care. • James Wylie, Executive Director of Education, Leisure and Housing. • Gareth Waterson, Head of Finance. • Brian Archibald, Head of Marine Services, Engineering and Transportation (for Items 1 to 3 and 22 to 24). • Peter Diamond, Head of Education (Leisure, Culture and Inclusion) (for Items 13 to 22). • Karen Greaves, Head of Executive Support. • Hayley Green, Head of IT and Facilities. • Roddy Mackay, Head of Planning, Development and Regulatory Services (for Items 10 to 15). • Gavin Mitchell, Head of Legal Services. • Darren Richardson, Head of Infrastructure and Strategic Projects (for Items 1 to 4). • Catherine Diamond, Early Years Lead Officer (for Items 14 to 22). • Peter Bevan, Engineering Services Manager (for Items 14 and 15). • Keith Foubister, Works and Inspection Manager (for Items 15 and 16). • Kenny MacPherson, IT Services Manager (for Items 15 to 17). • Hazel Flett, Senior Committees Officer. Page 1136. Observing • Andrew Groundwater, Head of HR and Performance (for Items 1 to 25). • Sweyn Johnston, Strategic Projects Director (for Items 10 to 13). • Rosemary Colsell, Procurement Manager (for Item 9). • Karen Walter, Early Learning and Childcare Delivery Plan Manager (for Items 14 to 22). • Meredith Macbeth, Cathedral Mason (for Items 15 and 16). • Andrew Hamilton, Performance and Best Value Officer (for Items 1 to 4). Declarations of Interest • Councillor J Harvey Johnston – Item 13. • Councillor John T Richards – Item 15. • Councillor Duncan A Tullock – Items 13 and 21. • Councillor Kevin F Woodbridge – Item 14. Chair • Councillor James W Stockan (for Items 1 to 24). • Councillor W Leslie Manson (for Items 25 and 26). 1. Disclosure of Exempt Information The Committee noted the proposal that the public be excluded from the meeting for consideration of Items 21, 22, 23 and 25, as the business to be discussed involved the potential disclosure of exempt information of the classes described in the relevant paragraphs of Part 1 of Schedule 7A of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 as amended. 2. Revenue Expenditure Monitoring 2.1. Policy and Resources After consideration of a joint report by the Chief Executive, the Executive Director of Corporate Services, the Executive Director of Development and Infrastructure and the Head of Finance, copies of which had been circulated, the Committee: Noted: 2.1.1. The revenue financial summary statement in respect of the undernoted services for the period 1 April to 30 September 2019, attached as Annex 1 to the joint report by the Chief Executive, the Executive Director of Corporate Services, the Executive Director of Development and Infrastructure and the Head of Finance, indicating an underspend position of £223,800: • Central Administration. • Law, Order and Protective Services. • Other Services. Page 1137. 2.1.2. The revenue financial detail by Service Area statement for the period 1 April to 30 September 2019, attached as Annex 2 to the joint report by the Chief Executive, the Executive Director of Corporate Services, the Executive Director of Development and Infrastructure and the Head of Finance. 2.1.3. The explanations given and actions proposed in respect of significant budget variances, as outlined in the Budget Action Plan, attached as Annex 3 to the joint report by the Chief Executive, the Executive Director of Corporate Services, the Executive Director of Development and Infrastructure and the Head of Finance. 2.2. Summary After consideration of a report by the Head of Finance, copies of which had been circulated, the Committee: Noted: 2.2.1. The summary revenue expenditure statement for the period 1 April to 30 September 2019, attached as Annex 1 to the report by the Head of Finance, indicating the following: • A total General Fund underspend of £1,396,700. • A surplus in Sources of Funding of £51,500. • A net Non-General Fund surplus of £6,510,400. 2.2.2. The financial detail across individual Sources of Funding for the period 1 April to 30 September 2019, including significant variances identified as Priority Actions, attached as Annex 2 to the report by the Head of Finance. 2.2.3. The explanations given and actions proposed in respect of significant budget variances, as outlined in the Budget Action Plan, attached as Annex 3 to the report by the Head of Finance. 3. Capital Expenditure Monitoring After consideration of a report by the Head of Finance, copies of which had been circulated, the Committee: Noted: 3.1. The detailed analysis of capital expenditure in respect of the General Fund and the Non-General Fund capital programmes, for the period 1 April to 30 September 2019, attached as Appendix 1 to the report by the Head of Finance. The Committee scrutinised: 3.2. Project updates in respect of the General Fund and the Non-General Fund capital programmes, for the period 1 April to 30 September 2019, attached as Appendix 2 to the report by the Head of Finance, and obtained assurance on progress being made with delivery of the capital programmes. Page 1138. 4. Performance Monitoring 4.1. Chief Executive’s Service After consideration of a report by the Chief Executive, copies of which had been circulated, and after hearing a report from the Head of Executive Support, the Committee: Scrutinised the performance of the Chief Executive’s Service for the reporting period 1 April to 30 September 2019, as set out in section 4 and Annex 1 of the report by the Chief Executive, and obtained assurance. 4.2. Corporate Services After consideration of a report by the Executive Director of Corporate Services, copies of which had been circulated, the Committee: Scrutinised the performance of Corporate Services for the reporting period 1 April to 30 September 2019, as set out in section 4 and Annex 1 of the report by the Executive Director of Corporate Services, and obtained assurance. 4.3. Council Delivery Plan After consideration of a joint report by the Chief Executive and the Executive Director of Corporate Services, copies of which had been circulated, the Committee: Scrutinised: 4.3.1. Progress made in respect of the targets within the Council Delivery Plan 2018 to 2023 for the reporting period 1 April to 30 September 2019, as set out in Annex 1 to the joint report by the Chief Executive and the Executive Director of Corporate Services. The Committee resolved to recommend to the Council: 4.3.2. That the undernoted actions that had been progressed to completion, be closed, while continuing to be referenced in future Council Delivery Plan monitoring reports: • Page 5 – 1.7 Revised Kirkwall Urban Design Framework, incorporating the Your Kirkwall Action Plan. • Page 9 – 2.4 We will review commissioned services and bring forward recommendations in relation to children’s services priorities and long-term sustainability. • Page 11 – 2.7 We will undertake a review of residential child care provision to reflect the changes brought about in the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014 and bring forward recommendations to establish a residential estate fit for the medium term to include young people potentially up to the age of 25. • Page 12 – 2.9 We will support our older people’s residential care home workforce to provide high quality care to people with dementia by delivering specialist dementia care training to those staff. • Page 23 – 3.10 We will continue to make representation to influence the Islands Bill and National Islands Plan to achieve the best possible outcome for our Communities. • Page 26 – 4.1 Develop Orkney as a Low Carbon Energy Systems Innovation Hub, including LNG Distribution, Hydrogen production and usage across all modes of transport and Academic Innovation Centre projects. Page 1139. • Page 27 – 4.3 Reprioritise economic development activity and funding to focus on inward investment and facilitating projects and support programmes which will have the highest / transformational impact in relation to job creation, inward migration / retention of working age population and community enablement. • Page 46 – BV1a Develop detailed Council-wide and service workforce plans that consider future workforce needs, current capacity, supply and recruitment, skills, and financial constraints. • Page 47 – BV1b Implement the Project Management Module on Concerto. Raise awareness of the newly developed Capital Project Appraisal Guidance amongst the Corporate Management Team and others with a role in capital project applications. • Page 49 – BV2 Review the Council’s current self-evaluation arrangements, and develop a revised How Good is Our Council? model encompassing corporate level, as well as service level, self-assessments. • Page 50 – BV4a Within the new Council Plan 2018 to 2023, and the new 2019 to 2022 service plans, make explicit the intended impact of Council and service priorities and targets on Orkney’s communities. • Page 51 – BV5a Within the context of the Strategic Planning Framework, review the Council’s performance management system, in order to ensure its ability to identify the impact of Council services and activities on Orkney’s communities. • Page 52 – BV5b Report Local Government Benchmarking Framework Indicators to Service Committees. 4.3.3. That the undernoted action be closed and deleted from the Council Delivery Plan: • Page 33 – 4.11 Facilitate the establishment of a sustainable abattoir operator, and the establishment of a long term appropriately scaled abattoir facility.
Recommended publications
  • Cruising the ISLANDS of ORKNEY
    Cruising THE ISLANDS OF ORKNEY his brief guide has been produced to help the cruising visitor create an enjoyable visit to TTour islands, it is by no means exhaustive and only mentions the main and generally obvious anchorages that can be found on charts. Some of the welcoming pubs, hotels and other attractions close to the harbour or mooring are suggested for your entertainment, however much more awaits to be explored afloat and many other delights can be discovered ashore. Each individual island that makes up the archipelago offers a different experience ashore and you should consult “Visit Orkney” and other local guides for information. Orkney waters, if treated with respect, should offer no worries for the experienced sailor and will present no greater problem than cruising elsewhere in the UK. Tides, although strong in some parts, are predictable and can be used to great advantage; passage making is a delight with the current in your favour but can present a challenge when against. The old cruising guides for Orkney waters preached doom for the seafarer who entered where “Dragons and Sea Serpents lie”. This hails from the days of little or no engine power aboard the average sailing vessel and the frequent lack of wind amongst tidal islands; admittedly a worrying combination when you’ve nothing but a scrap of canvas for power and a small anchor for brakes! Consult the charts, tidal guides and sailing directions and don’t be afraid to ask! You will find red “Visitor Mooring” buoys in various locations, these are removed annually over the winter and are well maintained and can cope with boats up to 20 tons (or more in settled weather).
    [Show full text]
  • Water Safety Policy in Scotland —A Guide
    Water Safety Policy in Scotland —A Guide 2 Introduction Scotland is surrounded by coastal water – the North Sea, the Irish Sea and the Atlantic Ocean. In addition, there are also numerous bodies of inland water including rivers, burns and about 25,000 lochs. Being safe around water should therefore be a key priority. However, the management of water safety is a major concern for Scotland. Recent research has found a mixed picture of water safety in Scotland with little uniformity or consistency across the country.1 In response to this research, it was suggested that a framework for a water safety policy be made available to local authorities. The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA) has therefore created this document to assist in the management of water safety. In order to support this document, RoSPA consulted with a number of UK local authorities and organisations to discuss policy and water safety management. Each council was asked questions around their own area’s priorities, objectives and policies. Any policy specific to water safety was then examined and analysed in order to help create a framework based on current practice. It is anticipated that this framework can be localised to each local authority in Scotland which will help provide a strategic and consistent national approach which takes account of geographical areas and issues. Water Safety Policy in Scotland— A Guide 3 Section A: The Problem Table 1: Overall Fatalities 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 Data from National Water Safety Forum, WAID database, July 14 In recent years the number of drownings in Scotland has remained generally constant.
    [Show full text]
  • Orkney Greylag Goose Survey Report 2015
    The abundance and distribution of British Greylag Geese in Orkney, August 2015 A report by the Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust to Scottish Natural Heritage Carl Mitchell 1, Alan Leitch 2, & Eric Meek 3 November 2015 1 The Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust, Slimbridge, Gloucester, GL2 7BT 2 The Willows, Finstown, Orkney, KY17, 2EJ 3 Dashwood, 66 Main Street, Alford, Aberdeenshire, AB33 8AA 1 © The Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the copyright holder. This publication should be cited as: Mitchell, C., A.J. Leitch & E. Meek. 2015. The abundance and distribution of British Greylag Geese in Orkney, August 2015. Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust Report, Slimbridge. 16pp. Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust Slimbridge Gloucester GL2 7BT T 01453 891900 F 01453 890827 E [email protected] Reg. Charity no. 1030884 England & Wales, SC039410 Scotland 2 Contents Summary ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Methods ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Field counts ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Structure in Orkney Island Mice
    Genetic structure in Orkney island mice: isolation promotes morphological diversification P Chevret, Lionel Hautier, Guila Ganem, Jeremy Herman, Sylvie Agret, Jean-Christophe Auffray, Sabrina Renaud To cite this version: P Chevret, Lionel Hautier, Guila Ganem, Jeremy Herman, Sylvie Agret, et al.. Genetic structure in Orkney island mice: isolation promotes morphological diversification. Heredity, Nature Publishing Group, 2021, 126 (2), pp.266-278. 10.1038/s41437-020-00368-8. hal-02950610 HAL Id: hal-02950610 https://hal-cnrs.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02950610 Submitted on 23 Nov 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 Genetic structure in Orkney island mice: isolation promotes morphological diversification 2 3 Pascale Chevret 1, Lionel Hautier 2, Guila Ganem 2, Jeremy Herman 3, Sylvie Agret 2, Jean-Christophe 4 Auffray 2, Sabrina Renaud 1 5 6 1 Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, UMR 5558 CNRS Université Lyon 1, Université de 7 Lyon, Campus de la Doua, 69100 Villeurbanne, France 8 2 Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution de
    [Show full text]
  • The North Orkney Population History Project
    Historical Demography, Oral History, Settlement Archaeology, and Landscape Ecology: The North Orkney Population History Project Please Do Not Cite or Reference – Email [email protected] for a final version of the paper to be presented on July 10, 2008 Tim Murtha, Pat Johnson, Jim Wood, Stephen Matthews, and Julia Jennings Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802 Corey Sparks University of Texas, San Antonio European Population Conference Barcelona, Spain July 9‐12, 2008 Presentation Date: July 10, 2008 (4:30‐6:00pm) Draft Date: June 23, 2008 (tm) July 1, 2008 Abstract: Between 1750 and 2000, the northern islands of Orkney (Scotland) underwent a major cycle of population growth and decline. The modern demographic transition, which contributed significantly to population decline over the past century, was atypical in several respects: it was late, the decline in fertility preceded that in mortality, and the transition involved massive net out‐migration, resulting in progressive depopulation. The North Orkney Population History Project is investigating these demographic changes within the context of the transition from near‐subsistence farming to modern, commercialized livestock rearing. Unusual for historical demography, we are linking parish records, census data, and vital registers to historical archaeological information on houses, farmsteads, and the past environment, and ethnographic/oral history material on local people’s perceptions of change over the past 80 years. Using data from the islands of Westray and Sanday, we compare the spatial distribution of households using multi‐scale point pattern analysis to ascertain the extent to which surviving archaeological remains can capture the historically documented settlement pattern of the pre‐modern demographic regime.
    [Show full text]
  • Ports Handbook for Orkney 6Th Edition CONTENTS
    Ports Handbook for Orkney 6th Edition CONTENTS General Contact Details 4 Introduction 5 Orkney Harbour Authority Area Map 6 Pilotage Services & Pilotage Index to PIERS & HARBOURS 45 Exemption Certificates 7 Main Piers Data 46-47 Orkney VTS 8 Piers: Reporting Points 9 Burray 48-49 Radar & AIS Coverage 10-11 Burwick 50-51 Port Passage Planning 12 Backaland 52-53 Suggested tracks Egilsay 54-55 Scapa Flow, Kirkwall, Stromness 13-15 Gibraltar 56-57 Prior notification requirements 16 Sutherland 58-59 Preparations for Port Entry 17 Graemsay 60-61 Harbour Craft 18 Holm 62-63 Port Security - (ISPS code) 19 Houton 64-65 Port Health 20 Longhope 66-67 Port Medical Officers Services 21 Lyness 68-71 Port Waste Reception Facilities 22 Moaness 72-73 Traffic Movements in Orkney 23 Kirkwall 74-78 Ferry Routes in & around Orkney 24 Hatston 79-83 Fishing Vessel Facilities 25 Hatston Slipway 84-85 Diving Support Boats 26 Nouster 86-87 Principal Wreck & Dive Sites Moclett 88-89 in Scapa Flow 27 Trumland 90-91 Towage & Tugs 28-31 Kettletoft 92-93 Ship to Ship Cargo Transhipments 32 Loth 94-95 Flotta Oil Terminal 34-38 Scapa 96-97 Guide to good practice for small Scapa Flow 98-99 vessel bunkering operations 39 Balfour 100-101 Guide to good practice for the Stromness 102-106 disposal of waste materials 40 Copland’s Dock 107-111 Fixed Navigation lights 41-44 Pole Star 112-113 Stronsay 114-115 Whitehall 116-117 Tingwall 118-119 Marinas 126-130 Pierowall 120-121 Tidal Atlas 131-144 Rapness 122-123 Pollution Prevention Guidelines 145 Wyre 124-125 2 3 PORTS HANDBOOK – 6TH EDITION The Orkney County Council Act of 1974 As a Harbour Authority, the Council’s aim, authorised the Orkney Islands Council through Marine Services, is to ensure that to exercise jurisdiction as a Statutory Orkney’s piers and harbours are operated Harbour Authority and defined the in a safe and cost effective manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Scoping Report Westray South Tidal Array
    Environmental Scoping Report Westray South Tidal Array October 2011 Rev 0.1 Prepared JRT & IH Checked FT, AD, FF, RB Approved RB & JT Date of October By By By Issue 2011 Page 2 of 259 Scoping report - Westray South CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 13 1.1 The Developer ...................................................................................................... 13 1.2 Project Overview and Agreement for Lease .......................................................... 13 1.3 Development Process ........................................................................................... 15 1.4 Pre-scoping consultation ....................................................................................... 20 2 PROJECT BOUNDARIES, APPROACH TO EIA AND CONSENTING PROCESS ...... 21 2.1 Geographical boundaries ...................................................................................... 21 2.2 Technical boundaries ............................................................................................ 22 2.3 Approach to EIA – Rochdale Envelope ................................................................. 23 2.4 Consenting approach ........................................................................................... 24 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................... 26 3.1 Offshore infrastructure .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Place Names in Orkney from 16Th- and 17Th-Century Maps
    Place names in Orkney from 16th- and 17th-century maps Lachlan of Cromarty Ian McIntosh [email protected] For this project, I recorded the Orkney Island placenames found on maps published in the second half of the sixteenth century and the rst half of the seventeenth century. I compared those spellings to modern Ordinance Survey maps. Nearly all placenames in Orkney are of Scandinavian origin, and very few are of Gaelic origin. Norse migration from the North completely superseded the previous, Pictish inhabitants of the islands. Especially characteristic are suxes of Old Norse origin; -ay (meaning `island'), -holm (meaning `round topped or grassy islet') and -skerry (meaning `rocky islet'). The maps I have organized the period maps at my disposal into two categories: those based upon early sixteenth century data, and those based upon the survey of Timothy Pont in the 1580s and 1590s. Maps in the former category were published in the late 16th C and very early 17th C For simplicity sake, I refer to these maps as 16th-C Maps. Maps of the latter category were all published in the 17th C, after Pont's death. I refer to these maps as 17th-C Maps. 16th C maps In the 16th-C Maps category are the maps of Abraham Ortelius, Gerhard Mercator, and John Speed. These maps are based upon documentation completed in the early sixteenth century, which is now lost. In his article, A History of Orkney Maps, John Chesters theorizes that Ortelius' map, circa 1575, was based upon an early draft of Gerhard Mercator's.
    [Show full text]
  • Pilot Pentland Firth and Orkney Waters Marine Spatial Plan Regional Locational Guidance March 2016 PILOT PENTLAND FIRTH and ORKNEY WATERS MARINE SPATIAL PLAN
    Pilot Pentland Firth and Orkney Waters Marine Spatial Plan Regional Locational Guidance March 2016 PILOT PENTLAND FIRTH AND ORKNEY WATERS MARINE SPATIAL PLAN Regional Locational Guidance March 2016 Report prepared by: On behalf of the Pilot Pentland Firth and Orkney Waters Working Group: Pilot Pentland Firth and Orkney Waters Marine Spatial Plan ___________________________________________________________________ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Pentland Firth and Orkney Waters (PFOW) area offers an unparalleled opportunity of exploiting energy from wind, wave and tidal stream to generate electrical power in close proximity to the Orkney Islands and the North coast of Scotland. This opportunity will also mean challenges for developers and licensing authorities in balancing the needs of a growing industry with other users of the marine environment. This Regional Locational Guidance collates information from a wide variety of sources to assist the wind, wave and tidal energy developers in situating their developments. This document will be one of a suite of supporting documents for the pilot PFOW Marine Spatial Plan. Spatial data information layers have been collected and used to illustrate the likely interactions that developers and licensing authorities will have to consider when initiating developments in the PFOW area. Fishing concerns will be one of the main considerations given the overlap of potential development areas and the highly active crab creeling industry that takes place in the PFOW. Environmental factors such as seal species will require particular attention given the sensitivity of some of these populations in this area and the uncertain effect of developments on their habitat. This Regional Locational Guidance is one of a range of tools that can be used to choose sites of maximum opportunity and minimum constraint but is not intended to be a stand-alone method of doing so.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Environmental Assessment of Orkney Inter-Isles Connectivity
    STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF THE ORKNEY ISLANDS INTER-ISLES CONNECTIVITY STRATEGY APPENDIX A: Table 5 Relevant plans, programmes and strategies (PPS) and environmental protective objectives, and their relationship with the Orkney Islands Inter-isles Connectivity Strategy TABLE 5 REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL AND EUROPEAN POLICY Name of PPS/ Title of legislation and main requirements of PPS / Environmental How it affects, or is affected by, The Strategy in terms of SEA environmental protection objective issues* at Schedule 3 of the Environmental Assessment protection objective (Scotland) Act 2005 UN Framework Energy Act 2004 Climatic factors and local air quality. Convention on Climate The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change was established Sets CO2 reduction targets that the Strategy needs to take into Change & its Kyoto in 1992 as an international framework to agree strategies to reduce account. Protocol emissions of greenhouse gases in relation to their impact on global climate. The Kyoto Protocol established a timetable for reduction in the emissions of these gases as well as a framework for sequestration of carbon by vegetation. Water Framework The Water Environment & Water Services (Scotland) Act 2003. Water, soil and biodiversity. Directive The Water Framework Directive establishes a new legal framework Sets targets for the chemical and ecological quality of water bodies (2000/60/EC)(WFD) for the protection, improvement and sustainable use of surface waters, that the Strategy must take into account. transitional waters, coastal waters and groundwater across Europe. Groundwater Directive The Groundwater Regulations 1998 Water. 80/68/EEC (Expected to The Regulations list substances which, based on toxicity, be revoked by the Water The prevention of pollution or over-abstraction of groundwater.
    [Show full text]
  • The of Orkney One Group
    The Islands of Orkney 2010 information and travel guide to the smaller islands of Orkney For up to date information visit the Orkney website at www.visitorkney.com and www.orkneytourism.com The Islands of Orkney Approximate driving times From Kirkwall and Stromness to Ferry Terminals at: • Tingwall 30 mins • Houton 20 mins From Stromness to Kirkwall Airport • 40 mins From Kirkwall to Airport • 10 mins The Islands of Orkney looking towards evie and eynhallow from the knowe of yarso on rousay - drew kennedy 1 The following will be happy to assist you find Contents Contents the most economic travel arrangements: Out among the isles . 2-5 At catching fish I am so speedy A big black scarfie fromEDAY . .6-9 www.visitorkney.com If you want something with real good looks You can’t go wrong with FLOTTA fleuks...........10-13 Travel and Holiday Centre There’s not quite such a wondrous thing as a beautiful young GRAEMSAY gosling . .14-17 67-69 Albert Street, Kirkwall, Orkney KW15 1HQ To take the head off all their big talk Just pay attention to the wise HOY hawk..........14-17 t: 01856 873359 f: 01856 872680 e: [email protected] All stand to the side and reveal From far NORTH RONALDSAY a seal .............18-21 A long established family company offering a When feeling low or down in the dumps comprehensive and tailormade service, both from Just bake some EGILSAY burstin lumps . .22-25 the world to the Orkney mainland and from the Orkney mainland to the outer isles. You can say what you like, I don’t care For I’m a beautiful ROUSAY mare .
    [Show full text]
  • Utilisation of Space by Grey Harbour Seals in the Pentland Firth And
    Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 441 Utilisation of space by grey and harbour seals in the Pentland Firth and Orkney waters COMMISSIONED REPORT Commissioned Report No. 441 Utilisation of space by grey and harbour seals in the Pentland Firth and Orkney waters For further information on this report please contact: Jane Dodd Scottish Natural Heritage Cameron House Albany St OBAN PA34 4AE Telephone: 0300 244 9360 E-mail: [email protected] This report should be quoted as: SMRU Ltd (2011). Utilisation of space by grey and harbour seals in the Pentland Firth and Orkney waters. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 441 This report, or any part of it, should not be reproduced without the permission of Scottish Natural Heritage. This permission will not be withheld unreasonably. The views expressed by the author(s) of this report should not be taken as the views and policies of Scottish Natural Heritage. © Scottish Natural Heritage 2011. i COMMISSIONED REPORT Summary Utilisation of space by grey and harbour seals in the Pentland Firth and Orkney waters Commissioned Report No. 441 Contractor: SMRU Ltd Year of publication: 2011 Background The Pentland Firth and Orkney waters are important for both grey and harbour seals. Both species are resident, using the area for all aspects of their life cycle. The area is also high in wave and tidal energy and areas in the Pentland Firth and Orkney waters have been leased for both demonstration and commercial renewable energy production projects. This report aims to assess the potential for overlap between areas around Orkney and the Pentland Firth that are used by seals and those proposed for wave/tidal energy development.
    [Show full text]