bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.26.355248; this version posted October 27, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 A New Paralog Removal Pipeline Resolves Conflict between RAD-seq and Enrichment 2 Wenbin Zhou1*, John Soghigian2, Qiu-yun (Jenny) Xiang1* 3 1 Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 4 27965, USA 5 2 Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 6 27965, USA 7 8 *Corresponding authors e-mail addresses:
[email protected];
[email protected] bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.26.355248; this version posted October 27, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. ZHOU ET AL. 9 ABSTRACT 10 Target enrichment and RAD-seq are well-established high throughput sequencing 11 technologies that have been increasingly used for phylogenomic studies, and the choice between 12 methods is a practical issue for plant systematists studying the evolutionary histories of 13 biodiversity of relatively recent origins. However, few studies have compared the congruence and 14 conflict between results from the two methods within the same group of organisms, especially in 15 plants, where extensive genome duplication events may complicate phylogenomic 16 analyses.