Uranium—It's Hot!! and Back by Popular Demand

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Uranium—It's Hot!! and Back by Popular Demand Volume 9, Number 2 C OLORADO G EOLOGICAL S URVEY Fall 2006 Uranium—It’s Hot!! And Back by Popular Demand Pure elemental uranium is a slightly parent element. This decay is radioactive metal, silvery white in color a natural constant in that half and dense (almost as dense as gold). Ele- of a given amount of uranium- mental uranium metal does not occur 238 (238U—the 238 superscript in nature because it readily combines refers to the atomic weight of with oxygen to form several uranium the atom) will decay to lead in oxide minerals and compounds. The about 4.5 billion years. It does most significant property of uranium is not decay directly to lead but that it is the “parent” element in a passes through several daugh- radioactive decay series that eventually ter elements including tho- leads to formation of a particular iso- rium, radium, radon (a gas), tope of lead. Radioactive decay means and bismuth on its path to a that certain elements, such as uranium, stable isotope of lead. See Fig- will over a specific period of time, give ure 1 for a much-simplified off atomic particles—electrons, protons, chart of the uranium-lead and neutrons—leading to changes in radioactive decay series. the atomic weight and Uranium is found in nature number of the in three main isotopes. 238U is the most common constitut- ing about 99.3 percent of all natural uranium; 235U consti- tutes about 0.7 percent of all Burro No. 7 Mine, Slick Rock, Colorado. (Photograph by Jim uranium; and other isotopes Cappa, 2005) such as 234U form trace amounts. 235U is important because it is stantial energy. 235U is more radioactive readily split as part of the fission process than 238U because of its shorter half-life, (Fig. 2) and in the process releases sub- about 700 million years, and as such, the ratio of 238U to 235U has changed Figure 1. Simplified uranium-lead radioactive decay series. over geological time. In the earth’s past, Abbreviations and explanation: Elements: U = uranium, there was a higher percentage of 235U Th = thorium, Ra = radium, Rn = radon, Po = polonium, than today. Scientists believe that this Pb = lead, Bi = bismuth. Half-lives: By = billion years, higher percentage of 235U (about 3 per- y = years, d = days, min = minutes. Subatomic particles; α = alpha particle, essentially y a helium nucleus consist- cent) led to a natural nuclear fission ing of two protons and two neutrons. β = beta particle a event that occurred about 1.7 billion high-energy electron or positron. years ago in present-day western Africa. Inside this issue: The Discovery of Uranium, its Uses and Future, the History of Uranium Mining in Colorado, Geology of Uranium Deposits in Colorado, Cleanup of Contaminated Mill Sites, and other useful information about Uranium CGS ROCKTALK Vol. 9, No. 2 1 From the Division Director— The boom is back! Colorado, A Natural Nuclear Reaction in which has supplied uranium Africa 1.7 Billion Years Ago to the world for more than a In the early 1970s, scientists noted that something century, is seeing the return of was strange about the uranium ore being mined at interest in this important the Oklo deposit in Gabon, West Africa. The ore energy resource. Prospectors was depleted in the fissionable isotope of uranium, are dusting off their scintil- 235U, and resembled the percentage found in spent lometers and heading for the nuclear fuel-about 0.25–0.30 percent (it should hills. Their apparent success is have been 0.7 percent). At the time, this uranium indicated by the filing of 3,000 deposit was formed (about 2,000 million years ago) new mining claims in the state the percentage of 235U was close to 3 percent, about last year. the same as what is used in a modern nuclear reac- Why the boom? Currently, tor. Scientists think that water seeped into the the 435 nuclear reactors in the world need 180 million deposit at about 1.7 billion years ago and allowed pounds of uranium per year, but the world only pro- the neutrons emitted from uranium to slow enough duces 110 million pounds. The shortfall has been made to initiate a chain reaction, which then over time up by depleting stockpiles from the last boom cycle and heated the water into steam causing the chain reac- by conversion of nuclear weapons. Both are diminish- tion to cease. This process may have happened ing in supply and consequently the price of uranium numerous times until the amount of 235U was increased from $10 per pound in 2003 to more than depleted enough to cause the cessation of the chain $55 per pound today. reaction. China and India’s increase in the use of nuclear energy The products of the nuclear reaction remained increases the demand for uranium. However, the United within the Oklo deposit and were never dissolved States also needs a lot of uranium because we are the or spread by ground water for 1.7 billion years. This world’s leading producer of nuclear energy. Indeed, we fact gives scientists hope that nuclear waste stored produce more nuclear energy than France, Spain, Ger- in geological formations may be immobile for, at many, Sweden, and the United Kingdom combined. least, millions of years. One of the best kept secrets in our country is that U.S. production of electricity from nuclear plants has increased over the decade since the last nuclear power plant came on line in 1996 (it was ordered in the early 1970s). This was achieved by increasing the operating Discovery of Uranium and Radioactivity efficiency of the plants. Today we produce nearly twice In 1789, uranium oxide was first recognized as the mineral as much nuclear power as any other country in the pitchblende (now considered as a variety of uraninite). The world, an amount equal to 30 percent of the world’s mineral was recovered from a silver mine in Joachimsthal, nuclear energy. Bohemia, now a part of the Czech Republic, by an amateur The increase in interest in uranium is but an indica- chemist, Martin Klaproth. Klaproth named the compound tor of growing interest in all of Colorado’s rich natural uranium in a tribute to his friend, William Herschel, a famous resources. China and India’s appetite for natural resources composer and astronomer, who had discovered the planet creates worldwide shortages and drives up prices of Uranus (Uranus is the Greek god of the Heavens). However, nearly every energy and mineral commodity. Colorado it was not until 1841 that the true metal, uranium, was iso- communities are already suffering from China-caused lated from its oxide form by a French chemist, Eugene Peligot. shortages of steel and cement. Prices for such diverse In 1896, another French scientist, Henri Bequerel, left some commodities as gold, copper, aluminum, molybdenum, uranium in a drawer with a photographic plate for a few days chromium, titanium, selenium, and antimony have sky- and to his surprise found the photographic plate to be rocketed in the 21st century with percentage price exposed. This lucky “experiment” was the beginning of atomic increases ranging from a low of 48 percent to more than research and the understanding of radioactivity. 1,700 percent! As shortages grow and prices increase, Marie Curie and her husband Pierre conducted various Colorado can expect to see increasing pressure to develop experiments on uranium ore, some of which came from Colo- our rich array of energy and mineral resources. rado, from 1898 through the 1920s in their lab in Paris. They recognized the process of radioactivity and discovered two Vince Matthews of uranium’s daughter products, polonium and radium. In the 1930s and early 1940s, scientists discovered that one 2 CGS ROCKTALK Vol. 9, No. 2 isotope of uranium, 235U, was fission- able—that is when an atom of 235U is bombarded by neutrons its nucleus splits into two equal parts, usually an atom of barium and krypton, at the same time releasing substantial energy in the form of heat and two or several more neu- trons (Fig. 2). The released neutrons then collide with other atoms of 235U, releas- ing more energy and neutrons, a process known as a chain reaction. The chain reaction released such large amounts of energy that it led to the development of nuclear weapons, ending World War II. After the end of the war scientists put the energy released by fission to work to heat water, create steam, turn a tur- bine to generate electricity—the major use of uranium today. Figure 2. Atomic fission of uranium. Explanation: Solid blue circles = protons, White circles = neutrons; Yellow circles = electrons. Uses of Uranium The very first uses of uranium, mostly radium; again, the manufacturers court case in which five “Radium Girls” in the form of complex uranium oxides, espoused their curative effects. Radium sued U.S. Radium Corporation was set- were as an agent in glass manufacture. was also being used to paint luminous tled in 1928 and exposed the deadly A small amount of uranium was added dials on clocks, watches, altimeters, and effects of radium. Its use declined dras- to the glass giving yellow and green col- other instruments. Young girls were tically after that. ors to the finished product. The glass is hired to paint the radium on the dial In the 1930s, scientists came to under- called Vaseline glass because it resem- faces and they were instructed to point stand the nature of radioactivity and the bles the color of Vaseline (Fig. 3). Ura- their paintbrushes with their lips.
Recommended publications
  • Significance of Mineralogy in the Development of Flowsheets for Processing Uranium Ores
    JfipwK LEACHING TIME REAGENTS TEMPERATURE FLOCCULANT CLARITY AREA COUNTER CURRENT DECANTATION It 21 21 J^^LJt TECHNICAL REPORTS SERIES No.19 6 Significance of Mineralogy in the Development of Flowsheets for Processing Uranium Ores \W# INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, VIENNA, 1980 SIGNIFICANCE OF MINERALOGY IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF FLOWSHEETS FOR PROCESSING URANIUM ORES The following States are Members of the International Atomic Energy Agency: AFGHANISTAN HOLY SEE PHILIPPINES ALBANIA HUNGARY POLAND ALGERIA ICELAND PORTUGAL ARGENTINA INDIA QATAR AUSTRALIA INDONESIA ROMANIA AUSTRIA IRAN SAUDI ARABIA BANGLADESH IRAQ SENEGAL BELGIUM IRELAND SIERRA LEONE BOLIVIA ISRAEL SINGAPORE BRAZIL ITALY SOUTH AFRICA BULGARIA IVORY COAST SPAIN BURMA JAMAICA SRI LANKA BYELORUSSIAN SOVIET JAPAN SUDAN SOCIALIST REPUBLIC JORDAN SWEDEN CANADA KENYA SWITZERLAND CHILE KOREA, REPUBLIC OF SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC COLOMBIA KUWAIT THAILAND COSTA RICA LEBANON TUNISIA CUBA LIBERIA TURKEY CYPRUS LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA UGANDA CZECHOSLOVAKIA LIECHTENSTEIN UKRAINIAN SOVIET SOCIALIST DEMOCRATIC KAMPUCHEA LUXEMBOURG REPUBLIC DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S MADAGASCAR UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF KOREA MALAYSIA REPUBLICS DENMARK MALI UNITED ARAB EMIRATES DOMINICAN REPUBLIC MAURITIUS UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT ECUADOR MEXICO BRITAIN AND NORTHERN EGYPT MONACO IRELAND EL SALVADOR MONGOLIA UNITED REPUBLIC OF ETHIOPIA MOROCCO CAMEROON FINLAND NETHERLANDS UNITED REPUBLIC OF FRANCE NEW ZEALAND TANZANIA GABON NICARAGUA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA GERMAN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC NIGER URUGUAY GERMANY, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA VENEZUELA GHANA NORWAY VIET NAM GREECE PAKISTAN YUGOSLAVIA GUATEMALA PANAMA ZAIRE HAITI PARAGUAY ZAMBIA PERU The Agency's Statute was approved on 23 October 1956 by the Conference on the Statute of the IAEA held at United Nations Headquarters, New York; it entered into force on 29 July 1957.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Some Methods of Concentrating Uranium and Radium in Carnotite Ore
    Scholars' Mine Masters Theses Student Theses and Dissertations 1932 A study of some methods of concentrating uranium and radium in carnotite ore H. L. Gibbs Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses Part of the Chemical Engineering Commons Department: Recommended Citation Gibbs, H. L., "A study of some methods of concentrating uranium and radium in carnotite ore" (1932). Masters Theses. 4815. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/masters_theses/4815 This thesis is brought to you by Scholars' Mine, a service of the Missouri S&T Library and Learning Resources. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A STUDY OF SOl.ill T,::ETHODS O:B" COl1C}~;TTRl~TnTG TJP"':~..1TTIJL! ;:J·TD RIillIOIJ IN C.AR~OTIT!~ ORE. by lliJ10LD L. GIBBS A THESIS submitted to the faculty of the SCI-TOOL OF MINES AND 1~'IETIJ:.,LURGY OF THE m·...lVERSITY OJ!' I'~IaSOURI in partial fulfillment of the work required for the Degree of' Ivll~T:ER OF SCIENCE n~ C:EIa1IC.AL ENGnmERnTG Rolla, ~~iissour1 1 9 3 2 Al'proved by f.A.J. -,. ~ Acknowledgments • • • • • • • 1 Object • • ••• • • • 2 Introduction • • • 2 Description of the Ore • • • 3 Examination o~ the Ore • • • • • 3 Methods of Analysis • • • • • • 7 Flocculation Tests • • • g Flotation of Carnotite • • • • • II Results of Flotation Testa • • • • 15 Recovery of Radium :rrom Leached Ore by Flotation • • • • 18 Summary
    [Show full text]
  • FACT SHEET Office of Public Affairs
    FACT SHEET Office of Public Affairs Phone: 301-415-8200 Email: [email protected] Uranium Recovery Background The production of fuel for nuclear power plants starts with taking uranium ore from the ground and then purifying and processing it through a series of steps. Uranium recovery focuses on extracting natural uranium ore from the earth and concentrating (or milling) that ore. These recovery operations produce a product, called "yellowcake," which is then transported to a succession of fuel cycle facilities where the yellowcake is transformed into fuel for nuclear power reactors. In addition to yellowcake, uranium recovery operations generate waste products, called byproduct materials, that contain low levels of radioactivity. The NRC does not regulate uranium mining or mining exploration, but does have authority over milling of mined materials and in situ processes used to recover uranium, as well as mill tailings. Today’s conventional uranium mills and in situ recovery (ISR) facilities are operating safely and in a manner that is protective of the environment. The NRC regulates these facilities in close coordination with other Federal agencies and State and Tribal governments and provides technical support and guidance to those Agreement States that have authority over uranium recovery activities. Discussion The NRC becomes involved in uranium recovery operations when the ore is processed and physically or chemically altered. This happens either in a conventional, heap leach uranium mill, or ISR. For that reason, the NRC regulates ISR facilities as well as uranium mills and the disposal of liquid and solid wastes from uranium recovery operations (including mill tailings).
    [Show full text]
  • Authority Review for the Former Staten Island Warehouse
    -. -“” i\lf 2’-L THE AEROSPACE CORPORATION Suite 4000, 955 L’Enfant P.!aza, S. W., Washington, D. C. 20024, Telephone: (202) 488-6000 7117-03.85.eav.15 20 August 1985 bee: A. Wallo F. Hoch (w/o) Mr. Arthur Whitman F. Newman (w/o) Division of Remedial Action Projects, NE-24 R. Johnson (w/o) U.S. Department of Energy Germantown, Maryland 20545 Dear Mr. Whitman: AUTHORITY REVIEW FOR THE FORMER STATEN ISLAND WAREHOUSE Aerospace has completed the analysis of the available documentation related to the former Staten Island Warehouse. The attachment is sub- mitted for your review to determine whether DOE has authority to pursue remedial action at the site under FUSRAP. As indicated in the summary of the attached analysis, it would appear that, except for export controls imposed by the State Department, the ore stored in the former Staten Island Warehouse was not under the control of the U.S. Government. The Manhattan District only purchased a portion of the U308 content of the ore, while African Metals Corpora- tion retained ownership of the radium and other precious metals that remained in the ore after processing. Further, the U.S. Government did not take custody of the ore until delivered by lighter free alongside ship to the Lehigh Valley Railroad at the Dean Mill Plant of the Archer- Daniels-Midland Company. As a result, it does not appear that DOE has authority under the Atomic Energy Act to take remedial actions, if needed, at this site. Based upon your review and final authority determination, Aerospace will prepare an elimination package to document the status of the site as it is turned over to the EPA for remedial action.
    [Show full text]
  • Roscoelite K(V ; Al; Mg)2Alsi3o10(OH)2 C 2001 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1.2 ° Crystal Data: Monoclinic
    3+ Roscoelite K(V ; Al; Mg)2AlSi3O10(OH)2 c 2001 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1.2 ° Crystal Data: Monoclinic. Point Group: 2=m: As minute scales, in druses, rosettes, or fan-shaped groups; ¯brous and in felted aggregates; as impregnations, massive. Physical Properties: Cleavage: Perfect on 001 . Hardness = Soft. D(meas.) = 2.92{2.94 D(calc.) = [2.89] f g Optical Properties: Transparent to translucent. Color: Dark clove-brown, greenish brown to dark greenish brown. Luster: Pearly. Optical Class: Biaxial ({). Pleochroism: X = green-brown; Y = Z = olive-green. ® = 1.59{1.610 ¯ = 1.63{1.685 ° = 1.64{1.704 2V(meas.) = 24.5±{39.5± Cell Data: Space Group: C2=c: a = 5.26 b = 9.09 c = 10.25 ¯ = 101:0± Z = 2 X-ray Powder Pattern: Paradox Valley, Colorado, USA. 10.0 (100), 4.54 (80), 3.35 (80), 2.60 (80), 1.52 (60), 3.66 (50), 3.11 (50) Chemistry: (1) SiO2 47.82 Al2O3 12.60 V2O5 19.94 FeO 3.30 MgO 2.43 CaO trace Na2O 0.33 K2O 8.03 + H2O 5.13 Total 99.58 (1) Stuckslager mine, California, USA. Polymorphism & Series: Forms a series with muscovite; 1M polytype. Mineral Group: Mica group. Occurrence: An early-stage gangue mineral in low-temperature epithermal Au-Ag-Te deposits; from the oxidized portions of low-temperature sedimentary U-V ores. Association: Quartz, pyrite, carbonates, °uorite, gold (Au-Ag-Te mineral association); corvusite, hewettite, carnotite, tyuyamunite (U-V mineral association). Distribution: In the USA, from the Stuckslager mine, Lotus, El Dorado Co., California; in Colorado, from Cripple Creek, Teller Co., La Plata district, La Plata Co., Magnolia district, Boulder Co., the Gateway district, Mesa Co., in the Uravan and Paradox, Bull Canyon, and Slick Rock districts, in Montrose, San Miguel, and Dolores Cos.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing Safeguards-By-Design at Natural Uranium Conversion Plants
    NIS Office of Nuclear Safeguards and Security Safeguards-By-Design Facility Guidance Series (NGSI-SBD-002) August 2012 Implementing Safeguards-by-design at Natural Uranium Conversion Plants U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERG National Nuclear Security AdministrationY IMPLEMENTING SAFEGUARDS-BY-DESIGN AT NATURAL URANIUM CONVERSION PLANTS Lisa Loden John Begovich Date Published: July 2012 iii CONTENTS Page CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................................... IV 1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE ................................................................................................. 1 2. KEY DEFINITIONS ......................................................................................................................... 2 3. SAFEGUARDS AT NUCPS ............................................................................................................. 7 3.1 SAFEGUARDS OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................. 7 3.2 TRADITIONAL AND INTEGRATED SAFEGUARDS ......................................................... 7 3.3 SAFEGUARDS RESPONSIBILITIES ..................................................................................... 8 3.3.1 STATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY RESPONSIBILITIES ..................................... 8 3.3.2 IAEA RESPONSIBILITIES ............................................................................................ 9 4. ELEMENTS OF FACILITY DESIGN THAT ARE RELEVANT
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Pe, Ph, and Carbonate on the Solubility of UO2 and Uraninite Under Nominally Reducing Conditions
    Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Vol. 62, No. 13, pp. 2223–2231, 1998 Copyright © 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd Pergamon Printed in the USA. All rights reserved 0016-7037/98 $19.00 1 .00 PII S0016-7037(98)00140-9 The role of pe, pH, and carbonate on the solubility of UO2 and uraninite under nominally reducing conditions 1 1 1 1 2 2 3, IGNASI CASAS, JOAN DE PABLO, JAVIER GIMENEZ´ , M. ELENA TORRERO, JORDI BRUNO, ESTHER CERA, ROBERT J. FINCH, * and 3,† RODNEY C. EWING 1Department of Chemical Engineering, Polytechnic University of Catalunya, Barcelona 08028, Spain 2QuantiSci SL, Parc Tecnolo`gic del Valle`s, Cerdanyola 08290, Spain 3Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA (Received August 14, 1997; accepted in revised form March 26, 1998) Abstract—Experimental data obtained from uranium dioxide solubility studies as a function of pH and under nominally reducing conditions in a 0.008 mol dm23 perchlorate medium and in a 1 mol dm23 chloride solution are presented. The solubility of extensively characterized uraninite samples from Cigar Lake (Canada), Jachymov (Czech Republic), and Oklo (Gabon) was determined in a solution matching the composition of a groundwater associated with granitic terrain. The redox potential of the test solution was monitored throughout the experimental period. The results obtained were modeled using aqueous formation constants compiled by the NEA, using stability constants corrected to appropriate ionic strengths. The solubility curves have been adjusted by calculating the 1 N value of Ks4 (UO2(s) 2H2O U(OH)4(aq)) that gave the best fit with the experimental data.
    [Show full text]
  • Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride: Waste Or Resource?
    UCRGJC-120397 PREPRINT Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride: Waste or Resource? N. Schwertz J. Zoller R Rosen S. Patton C. Bradley A. Murray This paper was prepared for submittal to the Global ‘95 International Conference on Evaluation of Emerging Nuclear Fuel Cycle Systems Versailles, France September 11-14,1995 July 1995 This isa preprint of apaper intended for publication in a jaurnal orproceedings. Since changes may be made before publication, this preprint is made available with the understanding that it will not be cited or reproduced without the permiasion of the anthor. DISCLAIMER This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United Stat= Government. Neither theunited States Governmentmor theuniversity of California nor any oftheir employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumesanylegalliabilityorrespomibility forthe accuracy,completeness,orusefuin~ of any information, apparatus, pduct, or process disdosed, or represents that its use wouldnotinfringe privatelyowned rights. Referencehemin to anyspe&c commercial prodocis, proms, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constituteor imply its endorsement, reconunendation, or favoring by the United States Government or the University of California. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessady state or reflect those of the United States Government or the University of California, and shall not be used for adveltising or product endorsement purposes. DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document . DEPLETED URANIUM HEXAFLUORIDE: WASTE OR RESOURCE? N. Schwertz, J. Zoller, R. Rosen, S. Patton LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY P.
    [Show full text]
  • Depleted Uranium Technical Brief
    Disclaimer - For assistance accessing this document or additional information,please contact [email protected]. Depleted Uranium Technical Brief United States Office of Air and Radiation EPA-402-R-06-011 Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460 December 2006 Depleted Uranium Technical Brief EPA 402-R-06-011 December 2006 Project Officer Brian Littleton U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Radiation and Indoor Air Radiation Protection Division ii iii FOREWARD The Depleted Uranium Technical Brief is designed to convey available information and knowledge about depleted uranium to EPA Remedial Project Managers, On-Scene Coordinators, contractors, and other Agency managers involved with the remediation of sites contaminated with this material. It addresses relative questions regarding the chemical and radiological health concerns involved with depleted uranium in the environment. This technical brief was developed to address the common misconception that depleted uranium represents only a radiological health hazard. It provides accepted data and references to additional sources for both the radiological and chemical characteristics, health risk as well as references for both the monitoring and measurement and applicable treatment techniques for depleted uranium. Please Note: This document has been changed from the original publication dated December 2006. This version corrects references in Appendix 1 that improperly identified the content of Appendix 3 and Appendix 4. The document also clarifies the content of Appendix 4. iv Acknowledgments This technical bulletin is based, in part, on an engineering bulletin that was prepared by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air (ORIA), with the assistance of Trinity Engineering Associates, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 9 SAFETY DATA SHEET CARNOTITE ORE SECTION 1
    SAFETY DATA SHEET CARNOTITE ORE SECTION 1: CHEMICAL PRODUCTS & COMPANY IDENTIFICATION NBL Program Office U. S. Department of Energy, 1 Science.gov Way, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 1-865-576-0598 Emergency Phone Numbers: 1-865-576-0598 Substance: Carnotite Ore Blend Trade Names/Synonyms: Potassium uranium vanadate, Uranium Oxide (U3O8), Uranous Oxide, Triuranium Octaoxide, Uranite Nasturan, CRM 4, CRM 5 Use and Restriction: This material is prepared for use as a standard or for inter- laboratory comparison programs at analytical laboratories, which routinely handle uranium and/or plutonium. NBL expects that recipients of their material are in compliance with 29 CFR 1910.1200(h) which requires employers to provide employees with effective information and training in hazardous chemicals in their work area. SECTION 2: HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION OSHA Hazards Toxic by inhalation, toxic by ingestion. Target Organs Kidney, Liver, Lungs, Brain. GHS Label Elements Pictogram Signal Word: Danger Page 1 of 9 Hazard Statements: Toxic by inhalation and ingestion Danger of cumulative effects May damage kidneys Precautionary Statements: Avoid Breathing Dust Avoid contact with skin, eyes and clothing When using do not eat, drink or smoke In case of accident or if you feel unwell seek medical advice immediately Use only with adequate ventilation GHS Classification Skin Irritation (Category 2) Eye Irritation (Category 2) Specific target organ toxicity - repeated exposure (Category 2) Specific target organ toxicity – acute exposure (Category 2) GHS Hazard Ratings R23/25: Toxic by inhalation and ingestion R33: Danger of cumulative effects S20/21: When using do not eat, drink or smoke S45: In case of accident or if you feel unwell seek medical advice immediately S61: Avoid release to the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Junior Ranger Book Is for All Ages
    National Park Service Manhattan Project U.S. Department of the Interior National Historical Park NM, TN, WA Manhattan Project National Historical Park JUNIORat Hanford, RANGERWashington Turn the page to accept this mission Welcome friends! My name is Atom U235 Fission. I will be your guide as we explore the Hanford site of the Manhattan JR JR RANGER Manhattan a Project N Project National Historical Park G SITE, WA ER together. This project was So big it changed the world! How to earn points This junior ranger book is for all ages. You may find some activities harder than others. That’s okay. You choose what activities to complete by earning enough points for your age. 4 points —— ages 6-8 Points needed 6 points —— ages 9-11 to earn a badge 8 points —— ages 12-14 10 points —— ages 15 and older ACTIVITIES POINT VALUE YOUR POINTS Complete activities in 1 activity = the Junior Ranger Book. 1 pt Join a docent tour or 1 pt ranger program. Total: Watch a park film. 1 pt Download the park’s app. Learn about our other locations. 1 pt This QR code will take you to the free National Park Service app. Once you have the app, search for the Manhattan Project to explore the entire park including sites in New Mexico, Tennessee, and Washington. WHEN FINISHED: Return your book to the visitor center and be sworn in as an official junior ranger. PARENTS: Participate with your aspiring junior ranger to learn about this park as a family. NEED MORE TIME? Mail your book to Manhattan Project National Historical Park, 2000 Logston Blvd.
    [Show full text]
  • Weeksite K2(UO2)2(Si5o13)·4H2O
    Weeksite K2(UO2)2(Si5O13)·4H2O Crystal Data: Monoclinic. Point Group: 2/m: As bladed or acicular crystals, flattened on {010} and elongated along [001], and as flat plates; also as spherulites and radiating fibrous clusters. - Twinning: By two-fold rotation around [401 ]. Physical Properties: Cleavage: Two good prismatic cleavages noted. Hardness = < 2 D(meas.) = ~ 4.1 D(calc.) = 3.80 Radioactive. Optical Properties: Transparent to translucent. Color: Yellow. Luster: Waxy to silky. Optical Class: Biaxial (-). α = 1.596 β = 1.603 γ = 1.606 2V(meas.) = ~ 60° 2V(calc.) = 66° Pleochroism: X = colorless, Y = pale yellow-green, Z = yellow-green. Dispersion: r > v, strong. Orientation: X = b, Y = c, Z = a. Cell Data: Space Group: C2/m. a = 14.26(2) b = 35.88(10) c = 14.20(2) β = 111.578(3)° Z = 4 X-ray Powder Pattern: Thomas Range, Utah, USA. 7.11 (10), 5.57 (9), 8.98 (8), 3.55 (7), 3.30 (7), 2.91 (6), 3.20 (5) Chemistry: (1) (1) Na2O 0.53 Al2O3 0.6 K2O 4.73 SiO2 29.44 CaO 0.67 UO3 55.78 BaO 3.11 H2O [7.02] MgO 0.18 Total 101.28 SrO 0.20 (1) Anderson mine, Arizona, USA; average of 8 electron microprobe analyses, supplemented by TGA, H2O calculated from structure, corresponds to (K1.031Na0.176Ca0.123Ba0.208)Σ=1.537(UO2)2.002 (Si5.030O13)·4H2O. Occurrence: In “opal" veinlets in rhyolite, agglomerates, sandstones and limestones. Association: “Opal," “chalcedony," calcite, gypsum, fluorite, uraninite, thorogummite, uranophane, boltwoodite, carnotite, margaritasite. Distribution: In the USA, in Utah, at the Autunite No.
    [Show full text]