Attentional Bias Components in Anxiety and Depression: a Systematic Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Attentional Bias Components in Anxiety and Depression: a Systematic Review Attentional Bias Components in Anxiety and Depression: A Systematic Review Denise Rogersa, Edel Murphya, Sarah Jane Windersa & Ciara M. Greenea aSchool of Psychology, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland Corresponding author: Associate Professor Ciara M. Greene Email: [email protected] Postal address: School of Psychology, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland Tel: +353 1 7168334 1 Abstract Attentional biases have been identified as a transdiagnostic cognitive process that may underlie a range of psychological disorders. They comprise three measurable and observable components; facilitation (rapid detection of concern-related stimuli), difficulty in disengagement (slower attentional shifting away from concern-related stimuli) and attentional avoidance (allocation of attention away from concern-related stimuli). Attentional biases to negative stimuli are common in anxiety and depression; however, their shared (i.e. transdiagnostic) and distinct components have not yet been systematically investigated. Literature searches were conducted on the PsychINFO, Embase, PubMed and Web of Science databases, yielding 560 articles after duplicates were removed. Articles were subject to abstract and full-text screening against study eligibility criteria. Twenty-five articles were included in the extraction phase. Data regarding population, experimental paradigm and attentional bias components were extracted. Results are suggestive of facilitation as a transdiagnostic attentional process across anxiety, depression and those with co- occurring anxiety and depression. There was strong evidence of avoidance in depression, with weaker evidence in anxiety, while delayed disengagement was observed in anxiety, but not in depression. Critical gaps in the literature were also identified. These findings provide support for the transdisagnostic nature of attentional biases, shedding light on the commonalities observed across diagnostic categories. Keywords: Attentional bias; facilitation; avoidance; delayed disengagement; anxiety; depression Funding: This work was supported by a scholarship to DR from the Health Services Executive of Ireland Public significance: This systematic review suggests that attentional biases towards and away from concern-related stimuli are a feature of both anxiety and depression, and suggest considerable overlap in the cognitive processes underlying these two disorders. 2 Introduction Mental health conceptualisation, research and treatment is currently in the midst of a paradigm shift. Traditional nosological systems, such as the Diagnostic Statistical Manual Fifth Edition (DSM- 5; American Psychiatric Association, 2013) and the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems Tenth Edition (ICD-10; World Health Organization, 1993), assume that mental health disorders are distinct and independent categorical entities (Krueger & Eaton, 2015). However, these systems have been heavily criticised for their lack of validity, over- specification, internal heterogeneity and high comorbidity rates (Hyman, 2007, 2010; Wakefield, 2016). Alternatively, the transdiagnostic approach posits that common cognitive, behavioural and psychophysiological processes predispose and maintain symptoms across diagnostic boundaries (Garland & Howard, 2014; Mansell, Harvey, Watkins, & Shafran, 2008). The transdiagnostic approach calls for a shift in focus from disorder-specific symptoms to cross-disorder processes (Harvey, Watkins, & Mansell, 2004). Attentional biases are an excellent example of a cognitive transdiagnostic process (Garland & Howard, 2014), as highlighted by the proliferation of attentional bias research over the past number of decades; reviews of this research have been conducted in relation to anxiety (Bar-Haim, Lamy, Pergamin, Bakermans-Kranenburg, & van Ijzendoorn, 2007), depression (Peckham, McHugh, & Otto, 2010), eating disorders (Dobson & Dozois, 2004), OCD (Muller & Roberts, 2005) and addictive disorders (Field & Cox, 2008). Attentional bias refers to the systematic tendency to preferentially attend to concern-related stimuli over non-concern-related stimuli (Mansell et al., 2008). The ability to flexibly allocate attention towards and away from salient environmental cues is arguably essential for adaptive functioning. Deficits or biases in this ability contribute to the onset and maintenance of many mental health difficulties, including anxiety and depression (Bar-Haim et al., 2007; Peckham et al., 2010). Anxiety and depression are two of the most prevalent mental health disorders world-wide and have a comorbidity rate of up to 50% (Goldberg, Krueger, Andrews, & Hobbs, 2009; Hirschfeld, 2001). Given the magnitude of these comorbidity rates, investigation into transdiagnostic processes such as attentional bias is warranted and may be fruitful in informing future transdiagnostic treatments such as attentional bias modification training (ABM; Craske, 2012). 3 Although there is a wealth of disorder-specific attentional bias research, few studies have taken a transdiagnostic perspective or focused upon the individual components of the attentional bias effect. Research has shown that attentional biases are comprised of three observable and measurable components; ‘facilitation’ (also referred to as vigilance, engagement and attentional orienting), ‘difficulty in disengagement’ and ‘attentional avoidance’ (Cisler, Bacon, & Williams, 2009; Cisler & Koster, 2010; Fox, Russo, Bowles, & Dutton, 2001). Facilitation refers to the process by which attention is drawn towards a threatening stimulus more quickly than a non-threatening stimulus (Cisler & Koster, 2010). Difficulty in disengagement describes the process by which attentional shifts away from a threatening stimulus are slower than attentional shifts away froma non-threatening stimulus. Attentional avoidance, in contrast, describes the process whereby attention is directed away from a threatening stimulus and strategically allocated to an alternative location. Theories Underlying Attentional Bias Components There are two main theories underlying the individual components of attentional bias; the vigilance-avoidance hypothesis and the delayed disengagement hypothesis. The vigilance- avoidance hypothesis has largely been investigated in anxious populations (Koster, Verschuere, Crombez, & Van Damme, 2005; Mogg, Bradley, Miles, & Dixon, 2004; Mogg, Bradley, De Bono, & Painter, 1997). The vigilance-avoidance hypothesis proposes that anxious individuals direct their attention towards threatening stimuli more quickly and more frequently during the early stages of processing (e.g. <500 milliseconds) and then direct their attention away from threatening stimuli during the later stages of processing (e.g. 1500 milliseconds; Mogg et al., 2004). The strategic re- direction of attention away from threatening stimuli alleviates distress in the short-term; however, persistent avoidance maintains distress overtime as it prevents habituation in the presence of threatening stimuli. Interestingly, research investigating the vigilance-avoidance hypothesis in depression is lacking. This may relate to the dominance of traditional models, such as Williams and colleagues’ (1988) model, which states that attentional biases in depression occur at later stages of processing only and are not detectable at shorter exposure durations. In contrast, the delayed disengagement hypothesis has been investigated in both anxious (Fox et al., 2001; Koster, Crombez, Verschuere, & De Houwer, 2004) and depressed populations (Goeleven, De Raedt, Baert, & Koster, 2006; Koster, De Raedt, Goeleven, Franck, & Crombez, 2005b). It suggests that anxiety and depression are maintained by impairments in inhibiting and shifting attention away from threatening or negative stimuli (Fox et al., 2001). Such difficulties in 4 disengagement result in sustained processing of negative stimuli rather than flexible re- engagement with other environmental stimuli. The delayed disengagement hypothesis has typically been measured at longer stimulus exposure durations (see Cisler & Koster, 2010 for a review). Attentional Bias Paradigms A number of experimental paradigms have been used to investigate the attentional bias effect. In order to elucidate the manner in which each paradigm investigates the attentional bias effect and how each paradigm differentiates between the different attentional bias components, a brief overview of the most commonly used tasks is provided below. In the Dot Probe Task (DPT; MacLeod, Mathews, & Tata, 1986), two stimuli (e.g. words, pictures or facial expressions) are presented simultaneously for a brief period. One stimulus is emotional in content and the other is neutral in content. After both stimuli disappear, a probe appears in one of the previously occupied locations. Participants are instructed to respond to the spatial location of the probe. Reaction times on congruent trials (i.e. trials where probes replace emotional stimuli) are subtracted from incongruent trials (i.e. trials where probes replace neutral stimuli) to calculate an attentional bias index score (MacLeod et al., 1986). A positive bias score is suggestive of an attentional bias towards emotional stimuli and a negative bias score is suggestive of an attentional bias away from emotional stimuli (i.e. attentional avoidance). Importantly, a positive bias score on the DPT may reflect either facilitated engagement with stimuli or difficulty in disengagement. These two attentional
Recommended publications
  • The Journal of Positive Psychology
    This article was downloaded by: [Institute of Coaching Professional Assoc], [Institute of Coaching] On: 30 October 2014, At: 07:55 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK The Journal of Positive Psychology: Dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rpos20 Positive impact by design: The Wales Centre for Behaviour Change J.A. Parkinsona, K.E. Ecclesa & A. Goodmana a Wales Centre For Behavior Change, School of Psychology, Bangor University, Brigantia Building, Bangor, Gwynedd Ll57 2AS, UK Published online: 11 Jul 2014. To cite this article: J.A. Parkinson, K.E. Eccles & A. Goodman (2014) Positive impact by design: The Wales Centre for Behaviour Change, The Journal of Positive Psychology: Dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice, 9:6, 517-522, DOI: 10.1080/17439760.2014.936965 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.936965 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information.
    [Show full text]
  • A Task-Based Taxonomy of Cognitive Biases for Information Visualization
    A Task-based Taxonomy of Cognitive Biases for Information Visualization Evanthia Dimara, Steven Franconeri, Catherine Plaisant, Anastasia Bezerianos, and Pierre Dragicevic Three kinds of limitations The Computer The Display 2 Three kinds of limitations The Computer The Display The Human 3 Three kinds of limitations: humans • Human vision ️ has limitations • Human reasoning 易 has limitations The Human 4 ️Perceptual bias Magnitude estimation 5 ️Perceptual bias Magnitude estimation Color perception 6 易 Cognitive bias Behaviors when humans consistently behave irrationally Pohl’s criteria distilled: • Are predictable and consistent • People are unaware they’re doing them • Are not misunderstandings 7 Ambiguity effect, Anchoring or focalism, Anthropocentric thinking, Anthropomorphism or personification, Attentional bias, Attribute substitution, Automation bias, Availability heuristic, Availability cascade, Backfire effect, Bandwagon effect, Base rate fallacy or Base rate neglect, Belief bias, Ben Franklin effect, Berkson's paradox, Bias blind spot, Choice-supportive bias, Clustering illusion, Compassion fade, Confirmation bias, Congruence bias, Conjunction fallacy, Conservatism (belief revision), Continued influence effect, Contrast effect, Courtesy bias, Curse of knowledge, Declinism, Decoy effect, Default effect, Denomination effect, Disposition effect, Distinction bias, Dread aversion, Dunning–Kruger effect, Duration neglect, Empathy gap, End-of-history illusion, Endowment effect, Exaggerated expectation, Experimenter's or expectation bias,
    [Show full text]
  • Alcohol-Related Attentional Bias: the Oler of Support Networks Kevin Hallgren
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of New Mexico University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Psychology ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2-8-2011 Alcohol-related attentional bias: The oler of support networks Kevin Hallgren Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/psy_etds Recommended Citation Hallgren, Kevin. "Alcohol-related attentional bias: The or le of support networks." (2011). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ psy_etds/58 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Psychology ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ALCOHOL-RELATED ATTENTIONAL BIAS: THE ROLE OF SUPPORT NETWORKS BY KEVIN A. HALLGREN B.A. Psychology, University of Missouri-Columbia, 2007 THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Psychology The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico December, 2010 ©2010, Kevin A. Hallgren iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge Dr. Barbara S. McCrady, my advisor and committee chair, for her help in the preparation of this project and manuscript. Her guidance has greatly helped my development as a researcher and a writer and helped shape my perspective on psychology research and practice. I would also like to thank my committee members, Drs. Eric Ruthruff and Angela Bryan for their assistance with the design of this study and data interpretation. I would like to acknowledge the substantial contributions by Aaron Haslam and Nichole Lawler for their assistance with running participants for this study.
    [Show full text]
  • The Search for New Ways to Change Implicit Alcohol-Related Cognitions in Heavy Drinkers
    ALCOHOLISM:CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH Vol. 30, No. 2 February 2006 The Search for New Ways to Change Implicit Alcohol-Related Cognitions in Heavy Drinkers Reinout W. Wiers, W. Miles Cox, Matt Field, Javad S. Fadardi, Tibor P. Palfai, Tim Schoenmakers, and Alan W. Stacy This article summarizes a symposium on new ways to change implicit alcohol-related cognitions, presented at the 2005 Annual Meeting of the Research Society on Alcoholism in Santa Barbara, California, organized by Wiers and Cox. During the past few years, research has demonstrated that implicit cognitions predict unique variance in prospective alcohol use and preliminary results indicate that they also predict treatment outcomes. The central question in this symposium was how implicit cognitions can be changed and how the changes will influence behavior. Field presented data showing that an attentional bias for alcohol can be altered by attentional training: heavy drinkers who were trained not to attend to alcohol stimuli reported less craving and drank less beer than those trained to attend to alcohol stimuli. Schoenmakers used a similar, clinically relevant attentional retraining (AR) procedure, heavy drinkers were trained not to attend to alcohol pictures or received no training. After the training, the AR group attended less to the alcohol pictures than the control group. Fadardi de- scribed the Alcohol Attentional Control Training Program (AACTP), which makes alcohol drinkers aware of the automatic, cognitive determinants of their drinking and aims to help them to gain con- trol over these processes. Data were presented to support the effectiveness of the AACTP. Palfai pre- sented data showing that alcohol drinkers can be taught to use implementation intentions to gain control over their drinking, which may be used to automatically activate self-control skills in the presence of alcohol cues.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lightbulb Paradox: Evidence from Two Randomized Experiments
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE LIGHTBULB PARADOX: EVIDENCE FROM TWO RANDOMIZED EXPERIMENTS Hunt Allcott Dmitry Taubinsky Working Paper 19713 http://www.nber.org/papers/w19713 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 December 2013 We are grateful to Raj Chetty, Lucas Davis, Stefano DellaVigna, Mushfiq Mubarak, Sendhil Mullainathan, Emmanuel Saez, Josh Schwartzstein, and other colleagues, as well as seminar audiences at the ASSA Annual Meeting, the Behavioral Economics Annual Meeting, Berkeley, the European Summer Symposium for Economic Theory, Harvard, the NBER Public Economics Meetings, Resources for the Future, Stanford, the Stanford Institute for Theoretical Economics, UCLA, the University of California Energy Institute, and the University of Chicago for constructive feedback. We thank our research assistants - Jeremiah Hair, Nina Yang, and Tiffany Yee - as well as management at the partner company, for their work on the in-store experiment. Thanks to Stefan Subias, Benjamin DiPaola, and Poom Nukulkij at GfK for their work on the TESS experiment. We are grateful to the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation for financial support. Files containing code for replication, the in-store experiment protocol, and audio for the TESS experiment can be downloaded from Hunt Allcott's website. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2013 by Hunt Allcott and Dmitry Taubinsky.
    [Show full text]
  • The Threat of Appearing Prejudiced and Race-Based Attentional Biases Jennifer A
    PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Report The Threat of Appearing Prejudiced and Race-Based Attentional Biases Jennifer A. Richeson and Sophie Trawalter Department of Psychology and C2S: The Center on Social Disparities and Health at the Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University ABSTRACT—The current work tested whether external heightened anxiety in anticipation of, as well as during, those motivation to respond without prejudice toward Blacks is interracial interactions that they are unable to avoid (Plant, associated with biased patterns of selective attention that 2004; Plant & Devine, 1998). Research by Amodio has found, reflect a threat response to Black individuals. In a dot- furthermore, that such high-EM individuals automatically probe attentional bias paradigm, White participants with evaluate Black targets more negatively than White targets, as low and high external motivation to respond without revealed by potentiated startle eye-blink amplitudes (Amodio, prejudice toward Blacks (i.e., low-EM and high-EM in- Harmon-Jones, & Devine, 2003), unlike people who are inter- dividuals, respectively) were presented with pairs of White nally motivated to respond in nonprejudiced ways toward and Black male faces that bore either neutral or happy Blacks. Taken together, this work suggests that exposure to facial expressions; on each trial, the faces were displayed Blacks automatically triggers negative affective reactions, in- for either 30 ms or 450 ms. The findings were consistent cluding heightened anxiety, in high-EM individuals. with those of previous research on threat and attention: Although Amodio’s work has begun to explore some of the High-EM participants revealed an attentional bias toward component processes that underlie differences between high- and neutral Black faces presented for 30 ms, but an attentional low-EM individuals’ affective and stereotypical evaluations of bias away from neutral Black faces presented for 450 ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Attentional Bias and Subjective Risk in Hypochondriacal Concern. Polly Beth Hitchcock Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1993 Attentional Bias and Subjective Risk in Hypochondriacal Concern. Polly Beth Hitchcock Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Hitchcock, Polly Beth, "Attentional Bias and Subjective Risk in Hypochondriacal Concern." (1993). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 5641. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/5641 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Emotional Reasoning and Parent-Based Reasoning in Normal Children
    Morren, M., Muris, P., Kindt, M. Emotional reasoning and parent-based reasoning in normal children. Child Psychiatry and Human Development: 35, 2004, nr. 1, p. 3-20 Postprint Version 1.0 Journal website http://www.springerlink.com/content/105587/ Pubmed link http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dop t=Abstract&list_uids=15626322&query_hl=45&itool=pubmed_docsum DOI 10.1023/B:CHUD.0000039317.50547.e3 Address correspondence to M. Morren, Department of Medical, Clinical, and Experimental Psychology, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; e-mail: [email protected]. Emotional Reasoning and Parent-based Reasoning in Normal Children MATTIJN MORREN, MSC; PETER MURIS, PHD; MEREL KINDT, PHD DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL, CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY, THE NETHERLANDS ABSTRACT: A previous study by Muris, Merckelbach, and Van Spauwen1 demonstrated that children display emotional reasoning irrespective of their anxiety levels. That is, when estimating whether a situation is dangerous, children not only rely on objective danger information but also on their own anxiety-response. The present study further examined emotional reasoning in children aged 7–13 years (N =508). In addition, it was investigated whether children also show parent-based reasoning, which can be defined as the tendency to rely on anxiety-responses that can be observed in parents. Children completed self-report questionnaires of anxiety, depression, and emotional and parent-based reasoning. Evidence was found for both emotional and parent-based reasoning effects. More specifically, children’s danger ratings were not only affected by objective danger information, but also by anxiety-response information in both objective danger and safety stories.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cognitive Model of Pathological Worry
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Behaviour Research and Therapy 50 (2012) 636e646 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Behaviour Research and Therapy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/brat A cognitive model of pathological worry Colette R. Hirsch a,b,*, Andrew Mathews a,c a King’s College London, UK b University of Western Australia, Australia c University of California, Davis, USA article info abstract Article history: We present an evidence-based model of pathological worry in which worry arises from an interaction Received 23 February 2012 between involuntary (bottom-up) processes, such as habitual biases in attention and interpretation Received in revised form favouring threat content, and voluntary (top-down) processes, such as attentional control. At a pre- 11 June 2012 conscious level, these processes influence the competition between mental representations when Accepted 27 June 2012 some correspond to the intended focus of attention and others to threat distracters. Processing biases influence the probability of threat representations initially intruding into awareness as negative Keywords: thoughts. Worry in predominantly verbal form then develops, influenced by conscious processes such as Worry Emotional processing biases attempts to resolve the perceived threat and the redirection of attentional control resources to worry fl Attention content, as well as the continuing in uence of habitual processing biases. After describing this model, we Interpretation present evidence for each component process and for their causal role in pathological worry, together Attentional control with implications for new directions in the treatment of pathological worry.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Effects of State and Trait Anxiety on Selective Attention To
    International Journal of Psychological Research ISSN: 2011-2084 [email protected] Universidad de San Buenaventura Colombia Ortega Marín, Jeniffer; Jiménez Solanilla, Karim; Acosta Barreto, Rocio Effects of state and trait anxiety on selective attention to threatening stimuli in a non-clinical sample of school children International Journal of Psychological Research, vol. 8, núm. 1, 2015, pp. 75-89 Universidad de San Buenaventura Medellín, Colombia Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=299033832007 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative INT.J.PSYCHOL.RES. 2015; 8 (1): 75-90 Effects of state and trait anxiety on selective attention to threatening stimuli in a non- clinical sample of school children Efectos de la ansiedad estado-rasgo sobre la atención selectiva a estímulos amenazantes en una muestra no clínica de niños escolarizados R e s e a r c h a a a, Jeniffer Ortega Marín , Karim Jiménez Solanilla , and Rocio Acosta Barreto * a Faculty of Psychology, Universidad San Buenaventura,Bogotá, Colombia. ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Attentional biases, consisting of a preferential processing of threatening stimuli, have been found in anxious adults as predicted by several cognitive models. However, Article history: studies with non-clinical samples of children have provided mixed results. Therefore, Received: 30-07-2014 the aim of this research was to determine the effects of state and trait anxiety on the Revised: 28-08-2014 selective attention towards threatening stimuli in a non-clinical sample of school Accepted: 10-12-2014 children (age: 8 to 13, n = 110) using the dot-probe task.
    [Show full text]
  • Cognitive Biases in Software Engineering: a Systematic Mapping Study
    Cognitive Biases in Software Engineering: A Systematic Mapping Study Rahul Mohanani, Iflaah Salman, Burak Turhan, Member, IEEE, Pilar Rodriguez and Paul Ralph Abstract—One source of software project challenges and failures is the systematic errors introduced by human cognitive biases. Although extensively explored in cognitive psychology, investigations concerning cognitive biases have only recently gained popularity in software engineering research. This paper therefore systematically maps, aggregates and synthesizes the literature on cognitive biases in software engineering to generate a comprehensive body of knowledge, understand state of the art research and provide guidelines for future research and practise. Focusing on bias antecedents, effects and mitigation techniques, we identified 65 articles (published between 1990 and 2016), which investigate 37 cognitive biases. Despite strong and increasing interest, the results reveal a scarcity of research on mitigation techniques and poor theoretical foundations in understanding and interpreting cognitive biases. Although bias-related research has generated many new insights in the software engineering community, specific bias mitigation techniques are still needed for software professionals to overcome the deleterious effects of cognitive biases on their work. Index Terms—Antecedents of cognitive bias. cognitive bias. debiasing, effects of cognitive bias. software engineering, systematic mapping. 1 INTRODUCTION OGNITIVE biases are systematic deviations from op- knowledge. No analogous review of SE research exists. The timal reasoning [1], [2]. In other words, they are re- purpose of this study is therefore as follows: curring errors in thinking, or patterns of bad judgment Purpose: to review, summarize and synthesize the current observable in different people and contexts. A well-known state of software engineering research involving cognitive example is confirmation bias—the tendency to pay more at- biases.
    [Show full text]
  • Infographic I.10
    The Digital Health Revolution: Leaving No One Behind The global AI in healthcare market is growing fast, with an expected increase from $4.9 billion in 2020 to $45.2 billion by 2026. There are new solutions introduced every day that address all areas: from clinical care and diagnosis, to remote patient monitoring to EHR support, and beyond. But, AI is still relatively new to the industry, and it can be difficult to determine which solutions can actually make a difference in care delivery and business operations. 59 Jan 2021 % of Americans believe returning Jan-June 2019 to pre-coronavirus life poses a risk to health and well being. 11 41 % % ...expect it will take at least 6 The pandemic has greatly increased the 65 months before things get number of US adults reporting depression % back to normal (updated April and/or anxiety.5 2021).4 Up to of consumers now interested in telehealth going forward. $250B 76 57% of providers view telehealth more of current US healthcare spend % favorably than they did before COVID-19.7 could potentially be virtualized.6 The dramatic increase in of Medicare primary care visits the conducted through 90% $3.5T telehealth has shown longevity, with rates in annual U.S. health expenditures are for people with chronic and mental health conditions. since April 2020 0.1 43.5 leveling off % % Most of these can be prevented by simple around 30%.8 lifestyle changes and regular health screenings9 Feb. 2020 Apr. 2020 OCCAM’S RAZOR • CONJUNCTION FALLACY • DELMORE EFFECT • LAW OF TRIVIALITY • COGNITIVE FLUENCY • BELIEF BIAS • INFORMATION BIAS Digital health ecosystems are transforming• AMBIGUITY BIAS • STATUS medicineQUO BIAS • SOCIAL COMPARISONfrom BIASa rea• DECOYctive EFFECT • REACTANCEdiscipline, • REVERSE PSYCHOLOGY • SYSTEM JUSTIFICATION • BACKFIRE EFFECT • ENDOWMENT EFFECT • PROCESSING DIFFICULTY EFFECT • PSEUDOCERTAINTY EFFECT • DISPOSITION becoming precise, preventive,EFFECT • ZERO-RISK personalized, BIAS • UNIT BIAS • IKEA EFFECT and • LOSS AVERSION participatory.
    [Show full text]