DOCSLIB.ORG

Southeast Glacial Plains Ecological Landscape

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Southeast Glacial Plains Ecological Landscape Southeast Glacial Plains ecological landscape Attributes and Characteristics Legacy Places This ecological landscape is home to some of the world’s best examples of continental AP Arlington Prairie PT Patrick Marsh glacial activity. Drumlins, eskers, kettle lakes, BK Bark and Scuppernong Rivers RC Raccoon Creek kames, ground and end moraines, and other glacial Bong Grassland Rush Lake features are evident throughout the entire area. BG RL A particularly striking area is the long “ridge” CD Campbellsport Drumlins SH Sheboygan County (known as a kettle interlobate moraine) that CC Cedar Creek Trout Streams formed between the Green Bay and Lake SY Sheboygan River Marshes Michigan lobes during the Wisconsin CB Cedarburg Bog Glaciation. The area is protected in part CW Crawfish River - Waterloo SL Shoveler Lakes - by the Kettle Moraine State Forest. Drumlins Black Earth Trench In addition to the many small kettle lakes DR Dunn - Rutland Savanna SV Sugar Creek Valley in this landscape, there are also a number of and Potholes SG Sugar River much larger lakes, such as the Lake Winnebago Pool system, the Yahara Chain of Lakes, Lake GH Glacial Habitat UR Upper Rock River Koshkonong, and Geneva Lake. Major rivers Restoration Area UL Upper Yahara River include the Rock, upper portion of the Milwaukee, HM Horicon Marsh and Lakes middle portion of the Fox, and the Illinois Fox. IF Illinois Fox River WB White River and Bloomfield Area WAUPACA OUTAGAMIE JM Jefferson Marsh WOOD PORTAGE BROWN LB WM White River Marsh Appleton Lake Koshkonong to T QUEEN LK R WINNEBAGO MANITOWOC and Uplands ROBE CALUMET Kettle Moraine Corridor WAUSHARA Manitowoc Canada geese congregating at Horicon Marsh LP LP Lakes of the Winnebago Pool NE Along the ADAMS WM RL MH LR Lower Rock River MARQUETTE GREEN SY SHEBOYGAN Kettle Moraine LAKE FOND DU LAC LB Lower Wolf River JUNEAU GH Sheboygan SH KM Kettle Moraine NE KM Bottomlands CD State Forest OZAUKEE MI Milwaukee River GH HM COLUMBIA WASHINGTON MI Lake Michigan MK Middle Kettle Moraine Southeast Glacial Plains Glacial Southeast SAUK MM Monroe - Muralt Prairie DODGE CC CB Millhome Woods AP MJ Mukwonago River MH DANE PT MK and Jericho Creek SK Southern Kettle CW UR Moraine: Whitewater UL WAUKESHA SL Milwaukee NE Niagara Escarpment IOWA JM Lake to Turtle Creek JEFFERSON BK DR MJ MILWAUKEE LK GREEN KM RACINE ROCK SV Racine MM BG LAFAYETTE SG LR SK KENOSHA Kenosha RC WALWORTH WB Beloit IF 182 Legacy Places by Ecological Landscape Wisconsin Land Legacy Report Although many of the landscape’s natural This landscape also offers excellent oppor- wetlands have been drained, a large amount tunities to expand and restore prairie and oak still remains. The largest single wetland savanna. A recent Department study of management in this landscape, Horicon Marsh, opportunities for grassland birds identified nearly is a globally significant area. forty areas in this landscape with good potential to establish functioning grassland systems. Soils are mostly silt loams but there are also areas of clay soils and sandy soils. Historically, many of the state’s richest and Most of the tillable land is intensively farmed, most diverse streams and rivers were found in with dairying and cash-cropping of grains the southeastern part of Wisconsin. Although and vegetables being the predominant types many have been degraded from a variety of non- of agriculture. The natural vegetation of this point pollution sources, improving management landscape was formerly a mix of hardwood forest, practices and the removal of dams have greatly prairie, savanna and wetlands. Today, very little improved many of these waters. One river in of the prairie and savanna habitat remains. particular that has maintained its quality, the Mukwonago, harbors one of the highest Conservation Needs and Opportunities concentrations of fish, mussels, and other aquatic The Southeast Glacial Plains is a particularly invertebrates in the Midwest. Many of the region’s important region of the state for nesting and lakes have extremely productive fisheries that draw migrating waterfowl. The large marshes and shallow anglers from throughout the Midwest. The water lakes that occur throughout the area provide critical quality in many of these lakes would benefit from feeding, nesting, and resting habitat for ducks additional watershed management practices. and geese and other marsh dwelling birds. Many opportunities exist to restore drained wetlands as Recreation Uses and Opportunities these areas are retired from farming. Also occurring Almost all types of outdoor recreation occur here are a number of less common wetland types within the Southeast Glacial Plains. A variety R such as bogs, fens, tamarack fens and wet prairies, of terrain and cover types and abundant lakes EYE M many of which harbor rare species. Of particular note and streams accommodate a broad range of land HOMAS are the many, mostly small, calcareous fens that are and water based recreation activities. However, use T scattered through this landscape. In fact, more fens of public lands and waters is very heavy and demand Kettle Moraine Low Prairie in Waukesha County occur here than in any other part of North America. for recreation is rapidly exceeding the capacity Figure 111: Land cover of the Southeast Glacial Plains Figure 112: Public conservation and other land ownership Figure 113: Land cover of public conservation lands in the Southeast Glacial Plains in the Southeast Glacial Plains Open Water Urban County Forest State 4% Urban 6% 5% 0% Federal 0% Agriculture Open Wetland 0% 15% 9% Forested Wetland Grassland 3% 9% Plains Glacial Southeast Forest 8% Shrubland 0% Shrubland 0% Open Wetland Other 45% Forest Grassland 96% 18% 11% Agriculture 58% (private land, roads, schools, cemetaries, military lands, etc.) Forested Wetland 13% Wisconsin Land Legacy Report Legacy Places by Ecological Landscape 183 Figure 114a: Legacy Places and public conservation lands of the Southeast Glacial Plains Marion Marshfield Clintonville 41 10 Algoma Legacy Places and public conservation lands Seymour Green Stevens Southeast Glacial Plains Bay Point Kewaunee Manawa Pittsville 10 De Pere Wisconsin 70 New 43 Rapids 44 London Waupaca LB 45 41 Nekoosa 39 Weyauwega Kaukauna 10 Appleton W o lf 53 Menasha 71 R iv e r Brillion Neenah 10 22 Two Rivers 50 Manitowoc 33 Wautoma 15 LP 69 Chilton Lake Omro r Winnebago ive 151 R Oshkosh Berlin Fox New Holstein 41 NE 43 Adams Kiel 68 WM RL MH Lake Michigan 30 Legacy Places 52 CD Campbellsport Drumlins Ripon SY Green GH Glacial Habitat Princeton 1 32 Restoration Area Lake 16 57 HM Horicon Marsh Montello MaustonLP Lakes of the Winnebago Pool Fond du Lac GH Plymouth LB Lower 90Wolf River 45 Sheboygan Bottomlands 94 Sheboygan MI Milwaukee River Falls 12 SH Markesan 19 NE Niagara Escarpment 47 Southeast Glacial Plains Glacial Southeast 41 KM RL Rush Lake Public Conservation Lands 39 SH Sheboygan County NE 28 State Trout Streams CD SY Sheboygan River Marshes Wisconsin Waupun WM White River Marsh Dells Federal 18 and Uplands 151 1 45 Portage County Forest Along the Kettle Moraine Fox Lake HM KM KettleReedsburg Moraine State Forest 12 51 60 Miles MH Millhome Woods (continued) GH 25 Mayville 0 2.5 5 10 Milwaukee Baraboo 48 Beaver West R i v MI e Dam Horicon Bend r 184 Legacy Places by Ecological Landscape Wisconsin Land Legacy Report Figure 115a: Legacy Places and land cover of the Southeast Glacial Plains Marion Marshfield Clintonville Algoma 10 41 Legacy PlacesWOLF RIVER and land cover WATERSHED Green Stevens Southeast Glacial Plains Seymour Bay Point Kewaunee Manawa De Pere Pittsville 10 LOWER FOX Wisconsin TWIN-KEWAUNEE WATERSHED 43 Rapids New WATERSHED Waupaca London 41 LB 45 Nekoosa 39 Weyauwega Kaukauna 10 Appleton Menasha UPPER WISCONSIN SOUTH WATERSHED Brillion Neenah 10 Two Rivers MANITOWOC Manitowoc WATERSHED Wautoma LP Chilton Lake Omro Winnebago Oshkosh 151 Berlin New 41 NE Holstein 43 Adams WM RL Kiel MH Lake Michigan Land Cover UPPER FOX WATERSHED Urban Ripon SY Princeton Green Lake Agriculture SHEBOYGAN Montello Mauston Fond du Lac WATERSHED Grassland GH Plymouth 94 Sheboygan 90 Sheboygan Shrubland Falls 12 SH Markesan 41 Forest KM Plains Glacial Southeast 39 Open Water NE CD Wisconsin Waupun LOWER WISCONSIN Open Wetland Dells UPPER ROCK MILWAUKEE WATERSHED 151 WATERSHED WATERSHED 45 Forested Wetland Portage Fox Lake Reedsburg HM Miles 12 51 (continued) 0 2.5 5 10 GH Mayville Baraboo Beaver West MI Dam Horicon Bend Wisconsin Land Legacy Report Legacy Places by Ecological Landscape 185 Figure 114b: Legacy Places and public conservation lands of the Southeast Glacial Plains Markesan 19 KM 47 28 43 Legacy Places NE Wisconsin CD AP Arlington Prairie Legacy Places and publicWaupun conservation lands Dells BK Bark and Scuppernong Rivers 18 1 BG Bong Grassland Portage SoutheastFox Glacial Plains Cedar Creek CC 12 Lake CB CedarburgReedsburg Bog (continued) CW Crawfish River-Waterloo HM 60 GH Mayville Drumlins 45 M i l DR Dunn-Rutland Savanna Baraboo 48 Beaver w 25 a u and Potholes Dam k 41 MI e Horicon e R GH Glacial Habitat iv West e 90 r Restoration Area 56 11 42 151 Bend HM Horicon Marsh 94 Juneau 2 Port Washington IF Illinois Fox River 39 CB JM Jefferson Marsh Hartford CC 26 R Columbus o LK Lake Koshkonong to AP c k 49 Cedarburg Kettle Moraine Corridor Lodi R i v LR Lower Rock River e r MI Milwaukee River 43 MM Monroe-Muralt Prairie 43 Lake Michigan MJ Mukwonago River MK Mequon and Jericho Creek 14 PT Patrick Marsh 66 39 12 67 PT Watertown RC Raccoon Creek 12 Sun CW C Prairie r SL Shoveler Lakes-Black 14 a UR w f Earth Trench i 21 s h Middleton Oconomowoc 45 SV Sugar Creek Valley 41 20 SG Sugar River Lake 94 Pewaukee UL Mills Delafield Milwaukee UR Upper Rock River Madison 4 Brookfield SL Monona R Wauwatosa i UL Upper Yahara River v e 35 r 36 and Lakes 12 Jefferson 64 West White River and 18 Waukesha WB Verona 25 New Allis Bloomfield Area 90 39 JM 18 58 40 Berlin Dodgeville 54 55 St.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Recognising Glacial Features. Examine the Illustrations of Glacial Landforms That Are Shown on This Page and on the Next Page
    1 Recognising glacial features. Examine the illustrations of glacial landforms that are shown on this C page and on the next page. In Column 1 of the grid provided write the names of the glacial D features that are labelled A–L. In Column 2 indicate whether B each feature is formed by glacial erosion of by glacial deposition. A In Column 3 indicate whether G each feature is more likely to be found in an upland or in a lowland area. E F 1 H K J 2 I 24 Chapter 6 L direction of boulder clay ice flow 3 Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 A Arête Erosion Upland B Tarn (cirque with tarn) Erosion Upland C Pyramidal peak Erosion Upland D Cirque Erosion Upland E Ribbon lake Erosion Upland F Glaciated valley Erosion Upland G Hanging valley Erosion Upland H Lateral moraine Deposition Lowland (upland also accepted) I Frontal moraine Deposition Lowland (upland also accepted) J Medial moraine Deposition Lowland (upland also accepted) K Fjord Erosion Upland L Drumlin Deposition Lowland 2 In the boxes provided, match each letter in Column X with the number of its pair in Column Y. One pair has been completed for you. COLUMN X COLUMN Y A Corrie 1 Narrow ridge between two corries A 4 B Arête 2 Glaciated valley overhanging main valley B 1 C Fjord 3 Hollow on valley floor scooped out by ice C 5 D Hanging valley 4 Steep-sided hollow sometimes containing a lake D 2 E Ribbon lake 5 Glaciated valley drowned by rising sea levels E 3 25 New Complete Geography Skills Book 3 (a) Landform of glacial erosion Name one feature of glacial erosion and with the aid of a diagram explain how it was formed.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Geological Process in Illinois Glacial
    INTRODUCTION TO GEOLOGICAL PROCESS IN ILLINOIS GLACIAL PROCESSES AND LANDSCAPES GLACIERS A glacier is a flowing mass of ice. This simple definition covers many possibilities. Glaciers are large, but they can range in size from continent covering (like that occupying Antarctica) to barely covering the head of a mountain valley (like those found in the Grand Tetons and Glacier National Park). No glaciers are found in Illinois; however, they had a profound effect shaping our landscape. More on glaciers: http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/10ad.html Formation and Movement of Glacial Ice When placed under the appropriate conditions of pressure and temperature, ice will flow. In a glacier, this occurs when the ice is at least 20-50 meters (60 to 150 feet) thick. The buildup results from the accumulation of snow over the course of many years and requires that at least some of each winter’s snowfall does not melt over the following summer. The portion of the glacier where there is a net accumulation of ice and snow from year to year is called the zone of accumulation. The normal rate of glacial movement is a few feet per day, although some glaciers can surge at tens of feet per day. The ice moves by flowing and basal slip. Flow occurs through “plastic deformation” in which the solid ice deforms without melting or breaking. Plastic deformation is much like the slow flow of Silly Putty and can only occur when the ice is under pressure from above. The accumulation of meltwater underneath the glacier can act as a lubricant which allows the ice to slide on its base.
    [Show full text]
  • An Esker Group South of Dayton, Ohio 231 JACKSON—Notes on the Aphididae 243 New Books 250 Natural History Survey 250
    The Ohio Naturalist, PUBLISHED BY The Biological Club of the Ohio State University. Volume VIII. JANUARY. 1908. No. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS. SCHEPFEL—An Esker Group South of Dayton, Ohio 231 JACKSON—Notes on the Aphididae 243 New Books 250 Natural History Survey 250 AN ESKER GROUP SOUTH OF DAYTON, OHIO.1 EARL R. SCHEFFEL Contents. Introduction. General Discussion of Eskers. Preliminary Description of Region. Bearing on Archaeology. Topographic Relations. Theories of Origin. Detailed Description of Eskers. Kame Area to the West of Eskers. Studies. Proximity of Eskers. Altitude of These Deposits. Height of Eskers. Composition of Eskers. Reticulation. Rock Weathering. Knolls. Crest-Lines. Economic Importance. Area to the East. Conclusion and Summary. Introduction. This paper has for its object the discussion of an esker group2 south of Dayton, Ohio;3 which group constitutes a part of the first or outer moraine of the Miami Lobe of the Late Wisconsin ice where it forms the east bluff of the Great Miami River south of Dayton.4 1. Given before the Ohio Academy of Science, Nov. 30, 1907, at Oxford, O., repre- senting work performed under the direction of Professor Frank Carney as partial requirement for the Master's Degree. 2. F: G. Clapp, Jour, of Geol., Vol. XII, (1904), pp. 203-210. 3. The writer's attention was first called to the group the past year under the name "Morainic Ridges," by Professor W. B. Werthner, of Steele High School, located in the city mentioned. Professor Werthner stated that Professor August P. Foerste of the same school and himself had spent some time together in the study of this region, but that the field was still clear for inves- tigation and publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarrernary GEOLOGY of MINNESOTA and PARTS of ADJACENT STATES
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Ray Lyman ,Wilbur, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director P~ofessional Paper 161 . QUArrERNARY GEOLOGY OF MINNESOTA AND PARTS OF ADJACENT STATES BY FRANK LEVERETT WITH CONTRIBUTIONS BY FREDERICK w. SARDE;30N Investigations made in cooperation with the MINNESOTA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1932 ·For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract ________________________________________ _ 1 Wisconsin red drift-Continued. Introduction _____________________________________ _ 1 Weak moraines, etc.-Continued. Scope of field work ____________________________ _ 1 Beroun moraine _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 47 Earlier reports ________________________________ _ .2 Location__________ _ __ ____ _ _ __ ___ ______ 47 Glacial gathering grounds and ice lobes _________ _ 3 Topography___________________________ 47 Outline of the Pleistocene series of glacial deposits_ 3 Constitution of the drift in relation to rock The oldest or Nebraskan drift ______________ _ 5 outcrops____________________________ 48 Aftonian soil and Nebraskan gumbotiL ______ _ 5 Striae _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 48 Kansan drift _____________________________ _ 5 Ground moraine inside of Beroun moraine_ 48 Yarmouth beds and Kansan gumbotiL ______ _ 5 Mille Lacs morainic system_____________________ 48 Pre-Illinoian loess (Loveland loess) __________ _ 6 Location__________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Trip F the PINNACLE HILLS and the MENDON KAME AREA: CONTRASTING MORAINAL DEPOSITS by Robert A
    F-1 Trip F THE PINNACLE HILLS AND THE MENDON KAME AREA: CONTRASTING MORAINAL DEPOSITS by Robert A. Sanders Department of Geosciences Monroe Community College INTRODUCTION The Pinnacle Hills, fortunately, were voluminously described with many excellent photographs by Fairchild, (1923). In 1973 the Range still stands as a conspicuous east-west ridge extending from the town of Brighton, at about Hillside Avenue, four miles to the Genesee River at the University of Rochester campus, referred to as Oak Hill. But, for over thirty years the Range was butchered for sand and gravel, which was both a crime and blessing from the geological point of view (plates I-VI). First, it destroyed the original land form shapes which were subsequently covered with man-made structures drawing the shade on its original beauty. Secondly, it allowed study of its structure by a man with a brilliantly analytical mind, Herman L. Fair­ child. It is an excellent example of morainal deposition at an ice front in a state of dynamic equilibrium, except for minor fluctuations. The Mendon Kame area on the other hand, represents the result of a block of stagnant ice, probably detached and draped over drumlins and drumloidal hills, melting away with tunnels, crevasses, and per­ foration deposits spilling or squirting their included debris over a more or less square area leaving topographically high kames and esker F-2 segments with many kettles and a large central area of impounded drainage. There appears to be several wave-cut levels at around the + 700 1 Lake Dana level, (Fairchild, 1923). The author in no way pretends to be a Pleistocene expert, but an attempt is made to give a few possible interpretations of the many diverse forms found in the Mendon Kames area.
    [Show full text]
  • Landtype Associations (Ltas) of the Northern Highland Scale: 1:650,000 Wisconsin Transverse Mercator NAD83(91) Map NH3 - Ams
    Landtype Associations (LTAs) of the Northern Highland Scale: 1:650,000 Wisconsin Transverse Mercator NAD83(91) Map NH3 - ams 212Xb03 212Xb03 212Xb04 212Xb05 212Xb06 212Xb01 212Xb02 212Xb02 212Xb01 212Xb03 212Xb05 212Xb03 212Xb02 212Xb 212Xb07 212Xb07 212Xb01 212Xb03 212Xb05 212Xb07 212Xb08 212Xb03 212Xb07 212Xb07 212Xb01 212Xb01 212Xb07 Landtype Associations 212Xb01 212Xb01 212Xb02 212Xb03 212Xb04 212Xb05 This map is based on the National Hierarchical Framework of Ecological Units 212Xb06 (NHFEU) (Cleland et al. 1997). 212Xb07 The ecological landscapes used in this handbook are based substantially on 212Xb08 Subsections of the NHFEU. Ecological landscapes use the same boundaries as NHFEU Sections or Subsections. However, some NHFEU Subsections were combined to reduce the number of geographical units in the state to a manageable Ecological Landscape number. LTA descriptions can be found on the back page of this map. County Boundaries 0 2.75 5.5 11 16.5 22 Miles Sections Kilometers Subsections 0 4 8 16 24 32 Ecological Landscapes of Wisconsin Handbook - 1805.1 WDNR, 2011 Landtype Association Descriptions for the Northern Highland Ecological Landscape 212Xb01 Northern Highland Outwash The characteristic landform pattern is undulating pitted and unpitted Plains outwash plain with swamps, bogs, and lakes common. Soils are predominantly well drained sandy loam over outwash. Common habitat types include forested lowland, ATM, TMC, PArVAa and AVVb. 212Xb02 Vilas-Oneida Sandy Hills The characteristic landform pattern is rolling collapsed outwash plain with bogs common. Soils are predominantly excessively drained loamy sand over outwash or acid loamy sand debris flow. Common habitat types include PArVAa, ArQV, forested lowland, AVVb and TMC. 212Xb03 Vilas-Oneida Outwash Plains The characteristic landform pattern is nearly level pitted and unpitted outwash plain with bogs and lakes common.
    [Show full text]
  • Crag-And-Tail Features on the Amundsen Sea Continental Shelf, West Antarctica
    Downloaded from http://mem.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on November 30, 2016 Crag-and-tail features on the Amundsen Sea continental shelf, West Antarctica F. O. NITSCHE1*, R. D. LARTER2, K. GOHL3, A. G. C. GRAHAM4 & G. KUHN3 1Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York 10964, USA 2British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK 3Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Am Alten Hafen 26, D-27568 Bremerhaven, Germany 4College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Rennes Drive, Exeter EX4 4RJ, UK *Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]) On parts of glaciated continental margins, especially the inner leads to its characteristic tapering and allows formation of the sec- shelves around Antarctica, grounded ice has removed pre-existing ondary features. Multiple, elongated ridges in the tail could be sedimentary cover, leaving subglacial bedforms on eroded sub- related to the unevenness of the top of the ‘crags’. Secondary, strates (Anderson et al. 2001; Wellner et al. 2001). While the smaller crag-and-tail features might reflect variations in the under- dominant subglacial bedforms often follow a distinct, relatively lying substrate or ice-flow dynamics. uniform pattern that can be related to overall trends in palaeo- While the length-to-width ratio of crag-and-tail features in this ice flow and substrate geology (Wellner et al. 2006), others are case is much lower than for drumlins or elongate lineations, the more randomly distributed and may reflect local substrate varia- boundary between feature classes is indistinct.
    [Show full text]
  • Wisconsin's John Muir
    Wisconsin’s John Muir An Exhibit Celebrating the Centennial of the National Park Service “Oh, that glorious Wisconsin wilderness! “Everything new and pure in the very prime of the spring when Nature’s pulses were beating highest and mysteriously keeping time with our own!” “Wilderness is a necessity... Mountain parks and reservations are useful not only as fountains of timber and irrigating rivers, but as fountains of life.” This exhibit was made possible through generous support from the estate of John Peters and the Follett Charitable Trust Muir in Wisconsin “When we first saw Fountain Lake Meadow, on a sultry evening, sprinkled with millions of lightning- bugs throbbing with light, the effect was so strange and beautiful that it seemed far too marvelous to be real.” John Muir (1838–1914) was one of America’s most important environmental thinkers and activists. He came to Wisconsin as a boy, grew up near Portage, and attended the University of Wisconsin. After decades of wandering in the mountains of California, he led the movement for national parks and helped create the Sierra Club. But for much of his life, Muir’s call to protect wild places fell on deaf ears. Muir studied science in Madison but quit in 1863 without a degree, “...leaving one University for another, the Wisconsin University for the University of the Wilderness.” Muir’s letter to the classmate who taught him botany at UW The Movement for National Parks Yosemite Valley “Everybody needs beauty as well as bread, places to play in and pray in, where Nature may heal and cheer and give strength to body and soul alike.” In 1872, Congress named Yellowstone the first national park.
    [Show full text]
  • Pleistocene Geology of Eastern South Dakota
    Pleistocene Geology of Eastern South Dakota GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 262 Pleistocene Geology of Eastern South Dakota By RICHARD FOSTER FLINT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 262 Prepared as part of the program of the Department of the Interior *Jfor the development-L of*J the Missouri River basin UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1955 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Douglas McKay, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price $3 (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Page Abstract_ _ _____-_-_________________--_--____---__ 1 Pre- Wisconsin nonglacial deposits, ______________ 41 Scope and purpose of study._________________________ 2 Stratigraphic sequence in Nebraska and Iowa_ 42 Field work and acknowledgments._______-_____-_----_ 3 Stream deposits. _____________________ 42 Earlier studies____________________________________ 4 Loess sheets _ _ ______________________ 43 Geography.________________________________________ 5 Weathering profiles. __________________ 44 Topography and drainage______________________ 5 Stream deposits in South Dakota ___________ 45 Minnesota River-Red River lowland. _________ 5 Sand and gravel- _____________________ 45 Coteau des Prairies.________________________ 6 Distribution and thickness. ________ 45 Surface expression._____________________ 6 Physical character. _______________ 45 General geology._______________________ 7 Description by localities ___________ 46 Subdivisions. ________-___--_-_-_-______ 9 Conditions of deposition ___________ 50 James River lowland.__________-__-___-_--__ 9 Age and correlation_______________ 51 General features._________-____--_-__-__ 9 Clayey silt. __________________________ 52 Lake Dakota plain____________________ 10 Loveland loess in South Dakota. ___________ 52 James River highlands...-------.-.---.- 11 Weathering profiles and buried soils. ________ 53 Coteau du Missouri..___________--_-_-__-___ 12 Synthesis of pre- Wisconsin stratigraphy.
    [Show full text]
  • MISCELLANEOUS (Ss, 23.09, 23.11, 27.01
    DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 373 NR 45 Chapter NR 45 STATE PARKS AND STATE FORESTS ( MISCELLANEOUS NR 46.01 State property (p. 373) NR 46.13 Camping (p. 384) NR 45.02 Property of others (p. 374) NR 45.14 Firearms (p, 389) NR 45.03 Refuse (p, 374) NR 45.16 Personal conduct- (p, 391) NR 45.05 Pets (p. 375) NR 45,16 Fees and charges (p. 39l) NR 45.06 Fires (p, 375) NR 45.17 . Admission fees (p. 396) NR 45.07 Peddling andsol !citing (p. 376) NR 46.18 Closing hours (p. 399) NR 45.08 Vehicular traffic (p. 376) NR 45.185 Closing (p, 400) NR 45.09 Boats (p, 377) NR 45.19 Beaches (p. 400) NR 45.10 Horses (p. 383) NR 45.20 Exceptions (p. 400) NR 45.11 Noise (p. 383) NR 46.21 Elevated devices (p. 400) NR 46.12 Parking (p. 383) NR 45.23 State scientific areas (p. 400) NR 45.126 Abandoned vehicles (p. 384) History. Chapter WCD 46 as it existed on June 30, 1964 was repealed and a new chapter WCD 46 was created effective July 1, 1964. (ss, 23.09, 23.11, 27.01 and 28.02, Stats.) NR 45.01 State property. (1) Except when the context provides otherwise the provisions of this chapter shall apply to all lands, struc- tures and property owned, under easement, leased or administered by the state of Wisconsin and under the management, supervision and con- trol of the department of natural resources. (2) It shall be unlawful for any person to destroy, molest, deface, re- move or attempt to remove any natural growth or natural or archaeologi- cal feature, or any state property; to enter or be in any building, installa- tion or area that may be locked or closed to public use or contrary to posted notice without a written permit from the property superintend- ent.
    [Show full text]
  • Wisconsin's Wetland Gems
    100 WISCONSIN WETLAND GEMS ® Southeast Coastal Region NE-10 Peshtigo River Delta o r SC-1 Chiwaukee Prairie NE-11 Point Beach & Dunes e i SC-2 Des Plaines River NE-12 Rushes Lake MINNESOTA k e r a p Floodplain & Marshes NE-13 Shivering Sands & L u SC-3 Germantown Swamp Connected Wetlands S SC-4 Renak-Polak Woods NE-14 West Shore Green Bay SU-6 SU-9 SC-5 Root River Riverine Forest Wetlands SU-8 SU-11 SC-6 Warnimont Bluff Fens NE-15 Wolf River Bottoms SU-1 SU-12 SU-3 SU-7 Southeast Region North Central Region SU-10 SE-1 Beulah Bog NC-1 Atkins Lake & Hiles Swamp SU-5 NW-4 SU-4 SE-2 Cedarburg Bog NC-2 Bear Lake Sedge Meadow NW-2 NW-8 MICHIGAN SE-3 Cherokee Marsh NC-3 Bogus Swamp NW-1 NW-5 SU-2 SE-4 Horicon Marsh NC-4 Flambeau River State Forest NW-7 SE-5 Huiras Lake NC-11 NC-12 NC-5 Grandma Lake NC-9 SE-6 Lulu Lake NC-6 Hunting River Alders NW-10 NC-13 SE-7 Milwaukee River NC-7 Jump-Mondeaux NC-8 Floodplain Forest River Floodplain NW-6 NC-10 SE-8 Nichols Creek NC-8 Kissick Alkaline Bog NW-3 NC-5 NW-9 SE-9 Rush Lake NC-9 Rice Creek NC-4 NC-1 SE-10 Scuppernong River Area NC-10 Savage-Robago Lakes NC-2 NE-7 SE-11 Spruce Lake Bog NC-11 Spider Lake SE-12 Sugar River NC-12 Toy Lake Swamp NC-6 NC-7 Floodplain Forest NC-13 Turtle-Flambeau- NC-3 NE-6 SE-13 Waubesa Wetlands Manitowish Peatlands W-7 NE-9 WISCONSIN’S WETLAND GEMS SE-14 White River Marsh NE-2 Northwest Region NE-8 Central Region NE-10 NE-4 NW-1 Belden Swamp W-5 NE-12 WH-5 Mink River Estuary—Clint Farlinger C-1 Bass Lake Fen & Lunch NW-2 Black Lake Bog NE-13 NE-14 ® Creek Sedge Meadow NW-3 Blomberg Lake C-4 WHAT ARE WETLAND GEMS ? C-2 Bear Bluff Bog NW-4 Blueberry Swamp WH-2WH-7 C-6 NE-15 NE-1 Wetland Gems® are high quality habitats that represent the wetland riches—marshes, swamps, bogs, fens and more— C-3 Black River NW-5 Brule Glacial Spillway W-1 WH-2 that historically made up nearly a quarter of Wisconsin’s landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Horicon Marsh Bird Checklist Status and Seasonal Distribution
    Horicon Marsh Bird Checklist Status and Seasonal Distribution Made possible by the Horicon Marsh Bird Club Seasons SP: Spring – Mar. – May S: Summer – June – Aug. F: Fall – Sept. – Nov. W: Winter – Dec. – Feb. Probable Abundance ( in suitable habitats and proper times ) A Abundant - Hard to miss – should be able to find on every trip C Common - Should see – should find on 75% of field trips U Uncommon - May see – present every year but in lesser numbers R Rare - Lucky to find – infrequent, few or identification problems H Accidental - Not Expected – sporadic reports or historical records * Nesting – Underlined Species indicates Neotropical Migrants Observer(s): ____________________________________________________ Date: ____________ Weather: _____________________________________ This list includes 288 species of birds that have been sighted on Horicon Marsh. Horicon Marsh is predominantly cattail marsh, managed primarily for waterfowl. However, due to the wide variety of habitat and that Horicon Marsh is over 32000 acres in size, it attracts an abundant diversity of bird species throughout the year. It should be noted that some migrants might be present for only two weeks or so. Birdwatching is encouraged. Please obey all signs and check at the State DNR and National Wildlife Refuge Headquarters for current information. Sp S F W Loons __ Common Loon R R H Grebes __ Pied-billed Grebe* CCCR __ Horned Grebe R R __ Red-necked Grebe* R R R __ Eared Grebe R R R Pelicans __ American White Pelican* C C C Cormorants __ Double-crested Cormorant* C C C R Bitterns, Herons __ American Bittern* UUUR __ Least Bittern* U U U __ Great Blue Heron* AAAR __ Great Egret* C C C __ Snowy Egret R R R __ Little Blue Heron R R R __ Cattle Egret R R R __ Green Heron* U U U __ Black-crowned Night-Heron* CCCR American Vultures __ Turkey Vulture* U U R Swans, Geese and Ducks __ Gr.
    [Show full text]