DOCSLIB.ORG

Brief Prepared for the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities of the House of Commons

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Brief Prepared for the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities of the House of Commons Brief prepared for the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities of the House of Commons Aviation Safety April 2017 James Dow Air Navigation Commissioner (retired) Summary Global standards for international civil aviation are developed, amended and adopted continuously by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). The Convention on International Civil Aviation calls on each contracting State to implement the standards so the world will have the highest practicable degree of uniformity in regulations, standards, procedures, and organization for civil aviation. When examining aviation matters it is important to ask whether there are global standards that apply. Today, our system of safety oversight is under stress. A study of aviation safety should take into account the global standards that apply to safety oversight to find where improvements might be made. ICAO Standards The Convention on International Civil Aviation provides for the adoption of International Standards and Recommended Practices. These are set out in annexes to the Convention. (A Standard is a specification to which Contracting States will conform in accordance with the Convention. A Recommended Practice is a specification to which Contracting States will endeavour to conform.) There are now about 12,000 Standards and Recommended Practices for international civil aviation set out in 19 Annexes to the Convention: Annex 1 Personnel Licensing Annex 2 Rules of the Air Annex 3 Meteorological Service for International Air Navigation Annex 4 Aeronautical Charts Annex 5 Units of Measurement to be Used in Air and Ground Operations Annex 6 Operation of Aircraft Annex 7 Aircraft Nationality and Registration Marks Annex 8 Airworthiness of Aircraft Annex 9 Facilitation Annex 10 Aeronautical Telecommunications Annex 11 Air Traffic Services Annex 12 Search and Rescue 1 Annex 13 Aircraft Accident and Incident Investigation Annex 14 Aerodromes Annex 15 Aeronautical Information Services Annex 16 Environmental Protection Annex 17 Security Annex 18 The Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air Annex 19 Safety Management Annex 19 – Safety Management is the newest annex. It was adopted by the ICAO Council in 2013 and became applicable in November of that year. These standards are developed almost entirely by expert groups of various kinds with experts from States and from industry. Canada contributes to this work with experts from government, such as Transport Canada and the Transportation Safety Board, and from industry, such as Nav Canada. A proposal for new standards can come from many sources. Proposals can come from assemblies that are held every three years, from air navigation conferences, from States, international organizations, panels, study groups, the Council, the Secretariat, the Air Navigation Commission1. Once the proposal is accepted, the work is assigned to an expert group. Presently, there are 17 panels reporting to the Air Navigation Commission. Beyond that, there are panels, like the Aviation Security Panel, that report to the Council, and, for environmental standards, there is the Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection (CAEP), a committee of 170 experts that also reports to the Council. CAEP reached agreement last year on a new body of environmental standards for CO2 emissions that will form a new volume of Annex 16 – Environmental Protection. There are other expert groups, such as study groups and task forces, that report to the Secretariat. Because you have been dealing recently with the question of Unmanned Air Vehicle Regulations, let me use an example of standard-setting in that technical area to illustrate the process of standard-setting at ICAO. ICAO now uses the term Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) and the Second High Level Safety Conference in February 2015 recommended that ICAO expedite the development of provisions to be used by States to regulate remotely piloted aircraft system operations within their airspace. The expert group developing standards in this area is the Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems Panel (RPASP). At their sixth meeting, held from 31 October to 4 November 2016, there were 109 experts. This included 29 members nominated by 19 Member States and 10 international organizations as well as 78 advisers. The panel met again last month and the eighth meeting will take place in June. Final drafts of new global standards for remotely piloted aircraft systems will be discussed by the panel in November of this year and brought back for endorsement by the tenth meeting in March 2018. After that, the new standards will be presented to the Air Navigation Commission at ICAO in a preliminary review, probably in the fall session of 2018. If the Commission agrees, the new standards will be sent out to all 191 member States for comment. A final review will take place in the fall of 2019 and the 1 The Council is the governing body of ICAO with 36 State representatives. The Air Navigation Commission is a group of 19 experts nominated by 19 States. They are appointed by the Council to serve as experts, not as representatives of their countries, to review all new Standards and Recommended Practices and Procedures for Air Navigation Services and to recommend them to the Council for adoption. The Secretariat is the permanent staff of ICAO, headed by the Secretary General. 2 schedule calls for the standards to be presented to the ICAO Council for adoption in March 2020.2 Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme (USOAP) The ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme (USOAP) was launched in January 1999, pursuant to a resolution by the ICAO Assembly. The objective was to promote global aviation safety by regularly auditing ICAO Member States to determine their capability for effective safety oversight. Canada was the first country to sign the Memorandum of Understanding, letting ICAO test their new procedures on us. The scope of the audits was expanded in 2004 and again Canada was the first to sign the MOU and be audited under the Comprehensive Systems Approach. When ICAO adopted the Continuous Monitoring Approach in 2012, Canada did not step forward and by 2015 we still hadn’t signed the memorandum. Finally, when only Canada and a couple of Pacific island States remained, Canada signed the MOU in August 2015. This was certainly noticed at ICAO but Canada is now on board. As you might expect for a developed country, the host country of ICAO and one of the States of chief importance in aviation on the Council of ICAO, the view of Canada from ICAO is generally positive. (Although at the 39th Assembly last year Canada garnered the least number of votes among the States in the first tier, being ranked last after the Russian Federation.) In some respects, such as the manner in which Nav Canada has been established, we are seen as a model for the world. This doesn’t mean that we shouldn't be concerned. Critical Elements of State Safety Oversight ICAO has identified and defined the critical elements of a State’s safety oversight system in Annex 19 – Safety Management. Critical elements are essentially the safety defence tools of a safety oversight system and are required for the effective implementation of safety-related policy and associated procedures. States are expected to implement safety oversight critical elements in a way that assumes the shared responsibility of the State and the aviation community. These elements encompass the whole spectrum of civil aviation activities, including areas such as aerodromes, air traffic control, communications, personnel licensing, flight operations, airworthiness of aircraft, accident/incident investigation, and transport of dangerous goods by air. The effective implementation of the Critical Elements is an indication of a State's capability for safety oversight. CE-1. Primary aviation legislation. The provision of a comprehensive and effective aviation law consistent with the environment and complexity of the State’s aviation activity and compliant with the requirements contained in the Convention on International Civil Aviation. 2 On 20 March 2017, ICAO issued a letter to all 191 member States reminding them of their obligation, under Article 8 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation, to protect civil aircraft from all “pilotless” aircraft. The letter informs States of an online toolkit designed to assist States with developing national regulations for domestic operations. 3 CE-2. Specific operating regulations. The provision of adequate regulations to address, at a minimum, national requirements emanating from the primary aviation legislation and providing for standardized operational procedures, equipment and infrastructures (including safety management and training systems), in conformance with the Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPs) contained in the Annexes to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. CE-3. State civil aviation system and safety oversight functions. The establishment of a Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) and/or other relevant authorities or government agencies, headed by a Chief Executive Officer, supported by the appropriate and adequate technical and non-technical staff and provided with adequate financial resources. The State authority must have stated safety regulatory functions, objectives and safety policies. CE-4. Technical personnel qualification and training. The establishment of minimum knowledge and experience requirements for the technical personnel performing safety oversight functions and the provision
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Crash Survivability and the Emergency Brace Position
    航空宇宙政策․法學會誌 第 33 卷 第 2 號 논문접수일 2018. 11. 30 2018년 12월 30일 발행, pp. 199~224 논문심사일 2018. 12. 14 http://dx.doi.org/10.31691/KASL33.2.6. 게재확정일 2018. 12. 30 Regulatory Aspects of Passenger and Crew Safety: Crash Survivability and the Emergency Brace Position Jan M. Davies* 46) CONTENTS Ⅰ. Introduction Ⅱ. Passenger and Crew Crash Survivability and the Emergency Brace Position Ⅲ. Regulations, and their Gaps, Relating to the Emergency Brace Position Ⅳ. Conclusions * Professor Jan M Davies MSc MD FRCPC FRAeS is a Professor of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine in the Cumming School of Medicine and an Adjunct Professor of Psychology in the Faculty of Arts, University of Calgary. She is the chair of IBRACE, the International Board for Research into Aircraft Crash Events. (https://en. wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Board_for_Research_into_Aircraft_Crash_Events) Amongst other publications, she is the co-author, with Linda Campbell, of An Investigation into Serial Deaths During Oral Surgery. In: Selby H (Ed) The Inquest Handbook, Leichardt, NSW, Australia: The Federation Press; 1998;150-169 and co-author with Drs. Keith Anderson, Christopher Pysyk and JN Armstrong of Anaesthesia. In: Freckelton I and Selby H (Eds). Expert Evidence. Thomson Reuters, Australia, 2017. E-Mail : [email protected] 200 航空宇宙政策․法學會誌 第 33 卷 第 2 號 Ⅰ. Introduction Barely more than a century has passed since the first passenger was carried by an aircraft. That individual was Henri Farman, an Anglo-French painter turned aviator. He was a passenger on a flight piloted by Léon Delagrange, a French sculptor turned aviator, and aircraft designer and manufacturer.
    [Show full text]
  • 44°52'51”N/063°30'33”W
    2015 ANNUAL REPORT 44°52’51”N/063°30’33”W wayp ints 1 Bell Boulevard, Enfield, N.S. B2T 1K2 Tel: 902.873.4422 Fax: 902.873.4750 HALIFAX INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY www.flyhalifax.com 44°52’51”N/063°30’33”W wayp ints Whether you’re flying In aviation, these markers are called ‘waypoints.’ They’re the physical landmarks and coordinates that a plane or growing an connect the dots between departure and arrival. international airport, Our 2015 annual report chronicles the many waypoints that defined and measured Halifax clear navigation is key to International Airport Authority’s progress throughout the year. These accomplishments – from increased reaching your destination. property development to improved customer experience – are waypoints along the path to But that end-point fulfilling our mission of being a ‘world-class airport creating prosperity for our region by connecting doesn’t just appear. Atlantic Canada to the world through flight.’ The journey is marked by milestones that confirm you’re on the right path. HALIFAX INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY – ANNUAL REPORT 2015 1 Message from the Chair As I took on the role of Chair in early 2015, after serving on the Board of Halifax International Airport Authority for almost a decade, I already knew just how important our airport is to business in the region. Wadih M. Fares Chair of the Board of Directors There are big numbers to support that. Halifax Stanfield is a major economic engine for the province, responsible It’s based on these emotional for a total of 13,295 full-time equivalent positions, including 5,725 direct jobs, connections that we developed and over $600 million in wages and salaries.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2019 Vol
    BUSINESS & COMMERCIAL AVIATION TRACING THE SINGLE-ENGINE TURBOPROP UNRELIABLE AIRSPEED READI MAY 2019 $10.00 www.bcadigital.com ALSO IN THIS ISSUE Unreliable Airspeed Readings Business & Commercial Aviation Operating Into Moscow Staying on Glidepath Incapable of Flight NGS STAYING ON GLIDEPATH MAY 2019 VOL. 115 NO. 5 Tracing the Single- Engine Turboprop Novelty aircraft become business assets Digital Edition Copyright Notice The content contained in this digital edition (“Digital Material”), as well as its selection and arrangement, is owned by Informa. and its affiliated companies, licensors, and suppliers, and is protected by their respective copyright, trademark and other proprietary rights. Upon payment of the subscription price, if applicable, you are hereby authorized to view, download, copy, and print Digital Material solely for your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that by doing any of the foregoing, you acknowledge that (i) you do not and will not acquire any ownership rights of any kind in the Digital Material or any portion thereof, (ii) you must preserve all copyright and other proprietary notices included in any downloaded Digital Material, and (iii) you must comply in all respects with the use restrictions set forth below and in the Informa Privacy Policy and the Informa Terms of Use (the “Use Restrictions”), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Any use not in accordance with, and any failure to comply fully with, the Use Restrictions is expressly prohibited by law, and may result in severe civil and criminal penalties. Violators will be prosecuted to the maximum possible extent. You may not modify, publish, license, transmit (including by way of email, facsimile or other electronic means), transfer, sell, reproduce (including by copying or posting on any network computer), create derivative works from, display, store, or in any way exploit, broadcast, disseminate or distribute, in any format or media of any kind, any of the Digital Material, in whole or in part, without the express prior written consent of Informa.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Annual Report ACE Aviation Holdings Inc
    2004 Annual Report ACE Aviation Holdings Inc. Successor Company Predecessor Company - Combined (2) Predecessor Company - Highlights ACE (1) Air Canada Air Canada Period ended Three months ended Period ended Twelve months ended December 31 December 31 December 31 December 31 2004 2003 2004 2003 Financial (CDN dollars in millions except per share figures) Operating revenues 2,062 1,977 8,900 8,373 Operating income (loss) before reorganization and restructuring items (3) (77) 117 (684) Reorganization and restructuring items - (560) (871) (1,050) Non-operating expense (67) (132) (315) (282) Loss before foreign exchange on non-compromised long-term monetary items and income taxes (70) (769) (1,069) (2,016) Income (loss) for the period 15 (768) (880) (1,867) Operating margin before reorganization and restructuring items (0.1)% (3.9)% 1.3% (8.2)% EBITDAR before reorganization and restructuring items (3) 193 227 1,146 690 EBITDAR margin before reorganization and restructuring items 9.4% 11.5% 12.9% 8.2% Cash and cash equivalents (unrestricted) 1,632 670 1,632 670 Cash flows from (used for) operations (426) (20) (66) 139 Weighted average common shares used for computation - diluted (4) 90 120 - 120 Earnings (loss) per share - basic and diluted (4) $ 0.17 $ (6.39) - $ (15.53) Operating Statistics (mainline-related) (5) (6) % Change % Change Revenue passenger miles (millions) (RPM) 9,252 8,878 4 41,653 37,888 10 Available seat miles (millions) (ASM) 12,189 12,409 (2) 53,767 51,340 5 Passenger load factor 75.9% 71.5% 4.4 pts 77.5% 73.8% 3.7 pts Passenger
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Claim
    Form 4.02A 2015 Hfx. No. ~~1- SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA BETWEEN: KATHLEEN CARROLL-BYRNE, ASHER HODARA and GEORGES LIBOY PLAINTIFFS -AND- Court Administration AIR CANADA, AIRBUS S.A.S., NAV CANADA, APR 2 8 2015 HALIFAX INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA representing Her Majesty the Queen in right of Canada, JOHN DOE #1 Halifax, N.S. and JOHN DOE #2 DEFENDANTS Proceeding under the Class Proceedings Act, S.N.S 2007, c. 28 Notice of Action TO: AIR CANADA Head Office 7373 C6te-Vertu Blvd, West Saint-Laurent, QC H4S 123 AND TO: AIRBUS S.A.S Airbus Headquarters in Toulouse 1, Rond Point Maurice Bellonte 31707 Blagnac Cedex France ANDTO: NAVCANADA 77 Metcalfe Street Ottawa, ON K1P 5L6 AND TO: HALIFAX INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY 1 Bell Boulevard Enfield, NS B2T 1 K2 AND TO: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Atlantic Regional Office Department of Justice Canada Suite 1400, Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Halifax, NS B3J 1P3 AND TO: JOHN DOE # 1 JOHN DOE # 2 c/o Air Canada Head Office 7373 Côte-Vertu Blvd, West Saint-Laurent, QC H4S 123 Action has been started against you The plaintiffs take action against you. The plaintiffs started the action by filing this notice with the court on the date certified by the prothonotary. The plaintiffs claim the relief described in the attached statement of claim. The claim is based on the grounds stated in the statement of claim. Deadline for defending the action To defend the action, you or your counsel must file a notice of defence with the court no more than the following number of days after the day this notice of action is delivered to you: • 15 days if delivery is made in Nova Scotia • 30 days if delivery is made elsewhere in Canada • 45 days if delivery is made anywhere else.
    [Show full text]
  • Carroll-Byrne V Air &Inada, 2019 NSSC 339 Date
    SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Carroll-Byrne v Air &inada, 2019 NSSC 339 Date: 20190904 Docket: HFX438657 Registry: Halifax Between: Kathleen Carroll-Byrne, Asher Hodara, and Georges Liboy Plaintiffs V. Air Canada, Airbus S.A.S., NAV Canada, Halifax International Airport Authority, The Attorney General of Canada, representing Her Majesty the Queen in right of Canada, John Doe #1, and John Doe #2 Defendants and The Canadian Transportation Accident Investigation and Safety Board and Air Canada Pilots Association Intervenors MOTION TO PRODUCE: REASONS FOR DECISION Judge: The Honourable Justice Patrick J. Duncan Heard: July 3, 2019, in Halifax, Nova Scotia Decision: September 4, 2019 Reasons: November 19, 2019 Counsel: Plaintiffs: Kate Boyle and Jamie Thomback Defendants: - Clay Hunter and Melanie Comstock (Air Canada) - John Brown and Christopher Odell (Airbus S.A.S.) - Robert Bell (NAV Canada) - Scott Campbell and Sarah Gray (Halifax International Airport Authority (HIAA)) - Angela Green and Heidi Collicutt (Attorney General of Canada) Inteiwenors: - Christopher Rootham (Air Canada Pilots Association (ACPA) - Richard Norman, Tanner Mclnnis, and Patrizia Huot (Transportation Safety Board of Canada) Page 2 By the Court: Introduction [1] On March 29, 2015, Air Canada flight 624 from Toronto to Halifax crashed 740 feet short of the runway at the Halifax International Airport, when attempting to land in a snowstorm. The plaintiffs in this matter represent a class that alleges acts of negligence on the part of the defendants, which negligence is said to have caused injury to the members of the class for which they should be compensated. The action has been certified as a class proceeding.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2015 01 HIGHLIGHTS the Financial and Operating Highlights for Air Canada for the Periods Indicated Are As Follows
    ANNUAL REPORT 2015 01 HIGHLIGHTS The financial and operating highlights for Air Canada for the periods indicated are as follows. FOURTH QUARTER FULL YEAR CANADIAN DOLLARS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT WHERE INDICATED 2015 2014 $ Change 2015 2014 $ Change FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE METRICS Operating revenues 3,182 3,104 78 13,868 13,272 596 Operating income 158 106 52 1,496 815 681 Non-operating expense (274) (206) (68) (1,188) (710) (478) Net income (loss) (116) (100) (16) 308 105 203 Adjusted net income (1) 116 67 49 1,222 531 691 Operating margin % 5.0% 3.4% 1.6 pp 10.8% 6.1% 4.7 pp EBITDAR (1) 425 319 106 2,534 1,671 863 EBITDAR margin % (1) 13.4% 10.3% 3.1 pp 18.3% 12.6% 5.7 pp Unrestricted liquidity (2) 2,968 2,685 283 2,968 2,685 283 Net cash flows from operating activities 238 16 222 2,012 954 1,058 Free cash flow (1) (376) (370) (6) 197 (547) 744 Adjusted net debt (1) 6,291 5,132 1,159 6,291 5,132 1,159 Return on invested capital (“ROIC”) % (1) 18.3% 12.1% 6.2 pp 18.3% 12.1% 6.2 pp Diluted earnings per share $ (0.41) $ (0.35) $ (0.06) $ 1.03 $ 0.34 $ 0.69 Adjusted earnings per share – diluted (1) $ 0.40 $ 0.23 $ 0.17 $ 4.18 $ 1.81 $ 2.37 OPERATING STATISTICS (3) % Change % Change Revenue passenger miles (“RPM”) (millions) 15,301 14,090 8.6 67,545 61,616 9.6 Available seat miles (“ASM”) (millions) 18,869 17,403 8.4 80,871 73,889 9.4 Passenger load factor % 81.1% 81.0% 0.1 83.5% 83.4% 0.1 Passenger revenue per RPM (“Yield”) (cents) 18.2 19.2 (5.5) 18.0 18.9 (4.6) Passenger revenue per ASM (“PRASM”) (cents) 14.7 15.6 (5.3) 15.1 15.8 (4.4) Operating
    [Show full text]
  • AIR TRAVEL COMPLAINTS Important Information and Instructions — Read Prior to Filling out Form —
    AIR TRAVEL COMPLAINTS Important Information and Instructions — Read Prior to Filling Out Form — Step 1: Contact the Air Carrier Before asking the Canadian Transportation Agency to investigate your complaint, you should first attempt to resolve the problem you have experienced by dealing directly with your air carrier (refer to the attached sheet: Major Air Carriers – Customer Service Departments). If you have not allowed the air carrier at least 30 days for an opportunity to respond to your written complaint, the Agency's role will be limited to forwarding a copy of the complaint to the carrier which will be asked to respond directly to you. Step 2: Determine Whether Your Complaint Falls Under the Agency's Mandate The Agency can deal with issues such as: y Baggage: For example lost, damaged and delayed baggage, or limits to size and quantity of baggage. Baggage claims, both domestic and international, are subject to proof of loss. Also, generally speaking, the Agency cannot award compensation beyond the limits of liability prescribed by carriers in their tariffs. • Flight disruptions: Note that carriers do not usually accept liability for flight delays, for missed connections when a person is travelling on tickets of two or more unrelated carriers, for costs incurred as a result of "force majeure" situations (weather conditions, mechanical breakdown), or for consequential damages resulting from flight delays. • Tickets and reservations: For example lost tickets, expired tickets, charges related to reissuing a ticket, and cancelled reservations. Matters related to tickets and reservations are within the Agency’s jurisdiction, and the terms and conditions associated with these matters must be clear, reasonable and not unduly discriminatory.
    [Show full text]
  • Operators in Crisis the COVID-19 PANDEMIC THRUSTS CANADIAN SKIESMAG.COM AIR OPERATORS INTO UNCHARTED TERRITORY
    AN MHM PUBLISHING MAGAZINE // APRIL/MAY 2020 COVER STORY Operators in Crisis THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC THRUSTS CANADIAN SKIESMAG.COM AIR OPERATORS INTO UNCHARTED TERRITORY ALSO Exploring Change SUMMIT AIR PURSUES NON- TRADITIONAL EXPANSION OPPORTUNITIES Low-Risk Capability BOEING OFFERS THE BLOCK III SUPER HORNET AS CANADA’S NEXT FIGHTER JET Specialists In Care FOX FLIGHT AIR AMBULANCE EXCELS THROUGH A COMMITMENT TO PATIENT CARE Next Gen Diamond WE FLY THE EFFICIENT, DIESEL- POWERED DIAMOND DA40 NG Otter Devotion PLANES & PARTS HAS BEEN FERRYING TWIN OTTERS FOR MORE THAN 50 YEARS CANADA’S AVIATION & AEROSPACE AUTHORITY ACCOMPLISHED. F LY The A330 MRTT carries more fuel, more passengers and more cargo than any other new generation tanker aircraft. With fewer flight hours required, your operational requirements are met – every time. Expand your operating capabilities with new features such as automatic refueling and increased connectivity systems, and join the growing list of experienced operators who have already placed their trust in the A330 MRTT – the most revered aircraft of its kind. Benchmark. We make it fly. airbus.com SKIESMAG.COM 81 April/May 2020 14043_AIR_A330-MRTT_10.75inchx8.375_SkiesMagazine_1.0.indd 1 20/01/2020 12:51 AN MHM PUBLISHING MAGAZINE // APRIL/MAY 2020 COVER STORY Operators in Crisis THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC THRUSTS CANADIAN SKIESMAG.COM AIR OPERATORS INTO UNCHARTED TERRITORY ALSO Exploring Change SUMMIT AIR PURSUES NON- TRADITIONAL EXPANSION OPPORTUNITIES Low-Risk Capability BOEING OFFERS THE BLOCK III SUPER HORNET AS CANADA’S NEXT FIGHTER JET Specialists In Care FOX FLIGHT AIR AMBULANCE EXCELS THROUGH A COMMITMENT TO PATIENT CARE Next Gen Diamond WE FLY THE EFFICIENT, DIESEL- POWERED DIAMOND DA40 NG Otter Devotion PLANES & PARTS HAS BEEN FERRYING TWIN OTTERS FOR MORE THAN 50 YEARS CANADA’S AVIATION & AEROSPACE AUTHORITY CERTIFIED OUTPERFORMANCE.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results Of
    2010 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition February 10, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Highlights.............................................................................................................................................................2 2. Introduction..........................................................................................................................................................4 3. About Air Canada ................................................................................................................................................5 4. Strategy ................................................................................................................................................................7 5. Overview.............................................................................................................................................................10 6. Results of Operations – Fourth Quarter 2010 versus Fourth Quarter 2009.................................................12 7. Results of Operations – Full Year 2010 versus Full Year 2009 .....................................................................25 8. Fleet ....................................................................................................................................................................34 9. Financial and Capital Management..................................................................................................................36
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL VOLUME FOUR AVIATION SECURITY.Indb
    ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. Air India Flight 182 A Canadian Tragedy VOLUME FOUR Aviation Security ©Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Public Works and Government Services, 2010
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Expense Chart
    Travel Expense Chart Employee Name Renee Barrette Employee Title Director of Policy Date of Travel June 3‐5, 2015 Destination (s) Berkeley, CA, USA Travel to attend 8th Annual Privacy Law Scholars Purpose Conference Related Costs: Airfare $ 725.40 Registration Fee $ 386.07 Accommodation $ 636.39 Meals $ ‐ Other transportation (taxis) $ 147.92 Hospitality $ ‐ Other expenses ( baggage fee) $ 47.61 Total: $ 1,943.39 8th Annual Privacy Law Scholars Conference - RegOnline Page 1 of 3 8th Annual Privacy Law Scholars Conference .Ih.~ .r..§_q_~.Y ...... ~ .IJ... Q . ~ ...94 .!... ?..9.. .1 .. ?.. -.f.E.i9.9..Y.! ... ~.~-~ -~-- -9..?... ....?..9 . ~.. .? The Claremont Hotel 41 Tunnel Road Berkeley, California 94705 United States Event Details Website: law.berkeley.edu/plsc Email: [email protected] Phone: 510-642-4712 Email Us Personal Info ll lll~lllllll lll ~ l ll llll ll l llll ll lll lll l llll Registration 10: Registrant: ms Renee Barrette director of Policy Information and Privacy Commissioner Ontario 2 Bloor Street East, suite 1400 toronto, ON M4w 1A8 Canada Registration Date: 1/4/2015 6:22PM Status: Confirmed Work Phone: Email: Name as it would appear on the badge: Renee Barrette Bio: Preferred Bio URL: Please see above Research Keyword I will not be presenting any research at the conference. Please enter no more than 15 keywords associated with your research. 611 7/2015 8th Annual Privacy Law Scholars Conference -RegOnline Page 2 of3 Registration Type Academics., : $300.00 $300.00 Fees Fee Quantity Unit Price Amount Fee Academics: $300.00 1 $300.00 $300.00 I Subtotal: $3oo.oo 1 ITotal: $3oo.oo 1 Transactions Transaction Type Date Amount Balance Transaction Amount 1/4/2015 $300.00 $300.00 Online Credit Card Payment (************ ) 1/4/2015 ($300.00) $0.00 Details Current Balance: $0.00 Payment Method Payment Method: Credit Card (Visa) The online credit card payment for this event will be listed on your credit card statement with the name UCB Boalt School of Law.
    [Show full text]