Americans and the Germ Theory of Disease

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Americans and the Germ Theory of Disease COPIRIGB'l'BD by PHILLIS ALLES 1949 AMERICANS AND THE GERM THEORY OF DISEASE Phyl lis Allen A Dissertation in History Presented to the Facultyof the Graduate School of the Universityof Pennsylvania in Par­ tial Fulfillmentof theRequirementsfor thedegree of Doc­ tor of Philosophy. August, 1949 Approved by Cvcrw.AI\T? W Ju,�. ;;,?,�ff::�� M L 1-Hs+. Qu) 11. I A4��£L TABLE OF CONTENTS J Cf'A/9 Preface Chapter 1. IntroductoryNote Theories of the Causation of Disease in theEarly 2. N�eteenth Century 3. The Contagium� Theory 4. American Animalcullsts @ The Germ Theory of Disease in the Mid-Century 6. Controversy over the Germ Theoryin Europe 7. The Germ Theory Comes toAmerica 8. Some Factors in theEarly AmericanNegiect of Bacteriology PREFACE This study was origtnally begun as a biography of 1obnKearsley Mitchell, but the background of Mitchell's cryptogamous �eory proved to be so interestingand of such signliicancethat a much fuller study of thisfield was indicated. The subject of Americananlmalc � hypo­ theses and their relation to the later development of medical bacteriology has been discussed brlefiy in a number of studies, and acknowledgement of my indebtedness to thesewill be noted in the citations. No systematic account of the early Americaninterest in the germ theory of disease has hithertobeen written;and the present study has been preparedwith this end in view. A considerable amount of the material in chapters two andfour was published in two articles in 1947. The first and longer study,'"Etio­ loglcal Theory in A�erica Prior to the Civil War,• appeared in the 1ournal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, VoL II, No. 4, Autumn, 1947, and parts of it are presented here withthe permission of the publisher, Mr. Henry Schuman. AJ1 analysis of theAmerican theories of the animalcular type, "Early American AnimalcularHypotheses," appeared in the Bulletin of the History of Medicine, Vol XXI, No. 5, Sep­ tember-October, 1947, and some data in it ar� presented with the per­ mission of the editor, Dr. Owse� Ternki1'- I wish to thank theAmerican Council of Learned Societies for a Pre-Doctoral Fellowship, and the University of Pennsylvania for a 11 Bloomfield Moore Fellowship, which enabled me to continue my graduate studies. I was greatly aided in making this study by many scholars who freely gave their advice and valuable assistance. Dr. Richard H. Shryock of theHistory Department of the University of Pennsylvania, with whom the work was done, contributed encouragement, suggestions and construc­ tive criticism to the undertaking in all stages, and he many tlmes assisted in clarification of thought and crystallizationof ideas throughhis careful discussion of the problems involved. For helpful suggestions I am under obligation to Dr. W. B. McDaniel, 2nd, Librariarlof theCollege of Physicians of Philadelphia, Dr. Henry E. Guerlac, Professor of theHistory of Science, Cornell University\ Dr. George Rosen, Editor of the 1ournal of the Histo�y of Medlcine and Allied Sciences, Dr. ErwinH. Ackerknecht, Professor of the History of Medicine, i University of Wisconsin, Dr. Henry E. Sigerist, formerly Director of the Institute of the History of Medicine, 1ohns Hopkins University, Dr. Geddes Smith of the Commonwealth Fund, and Dr. Russell Francis of the University of Pennsylvania. Dr. W. C. McDermott of the Classics Department of the University of Pennsylvania has been most helpful in interpretingthe work of Marcus Antonius Plenciz. Dr. Evan C. Horning and Dr. Claude Deischer of the Chemistry Department aided withthe chemical terms. Mr. Samuel Hopkins Adams !JfAuburn, N. Y. has kindlydirected the author to useful materials. The work could not have been completed without the use of certain ill excellent libraries and the courtesy extended by theirlibrarians, notably theLibrary of the College of Physicians of Philadelphia, theArmy Medical Library in Washington andCleveland, the Main andMedical Libraries of the University of Pennsylvania, the Library of Cornell University, and the Rush Rhees, Women's College and Medical Libraries of the University of Rochester. ' Phyllis Allen Pblladelphla May 24, 1949 1. Chapter 1. IntroductoryNote At the opening of the nineteenth century, modern medicine had progressed so steadily that solutions to outstanding problenis seemed just around the corner. Inthe three centuries following the initialwork of Vesalius, anatomy had become a science. The human bodywas ex­ plored as effectively as was the terrestrial globe in the same era. In gross anatomy discovery after discoverywas made, and many landmarks bear the names of those who first located them: Gllsson's c1,tpsule, the antrum of Highmore, the circle of Willis, Peyer's glands, and others. No longer did medicine rely uponthe antiquated lore of Galen - medical men observed for themselyes. Physiology also profited from the develop­ ment of anatomy, while ;l'enewed interest in clinical medicine led to a return to the principle�· of Hippocrates. By the end of the eighteenth century, there was a much better understanding of the composition and functioning of the human body than had ever existed before. This understanding was further advanced by progress in the new field of pathologic anatomy. Less than twen.ty-five years after the publi­ cation of Morgagni's classic work on pathologic anatomy in 1761, French physicians took up this work and added to it. The ravages of disease were not only described as they affected the various organs of the body, but the lesions were correlated with clinical symptoms so as to give a clear picture of the disease under observation. Where heretofore diagnosis of a disease had been dependent almost solely upon the ob- 2. servation of obvio� symptoms, now the physicians were able to dif­ ferentiate among various disorders - with the knowledge that certain symptoms were characteristic of one disease and not of another. Accurate clinical observation became doubly important. Charac­ t�ristic signs and syndromes were added to thediagnostician's reper­ toire. The development and improvement of aids to the senses, �d of measuring devices, became extremely importantin diagnosis. Th� stethoscope, percussion, the use of the watch and thethermometer, to name a few, all aided the physician. Clinical stailstics, as applied by P. -C. -A. Louis to prove thedanger of venesection, also played a part. Mortality statistics � been compiled as early as 1662, but it took some time to put themon a sailsfactory basis. Such statistics were an im- , portant feature of Jacques Rene, Tenon's expose of thehospitals of Paris in 1'18'1. The nosologists of the eighteenth century had worked out an elaborate systemization of disease based on symptoms. Each symptom was considered a disease in itself. Needless to say, this made a tremen­ dous list Other systematizers such as Wllllam Cullen, were more moderate; but their classifications were, of necessitf, based largely on classes of symptoms because there was no other satisfactory basis available at the_ time. After the work of the pathologic anatomists, how­ ever, the classification of disease could be based on a correlation of symptoms with the lesions found at autopsies. This resulted in a new concept of specificity and a different set of specific diseases. it involved 3. the taskof breaking down such a concept as ''bilious fever" into malaria, typhus, typhoid and yellow fevers. Diseases of thechest were no longer a unity, but, according to the interrelation of symp­ toms and tissue changes, now became phthisis, pneumonia. pleurisy, andso on. In some instances, three or four entities emerged where only one had be�n suspected previously. These developments raised a new problem. If three or four diseases were now recognized where formerly there had been only one, to what must be ascribed the differences between them? Could lt be thatthere were an equal number of factors in theexternal and in­ ternal (body) environments, which were responsible for thedifferen­ tiation? By the last years of the eighteenth century, physicians had begun to ask these questions seriously. Some writers, in suggesting answers, attempted to make distinctions among the external factors (remote causes such as miasmata), which they believed to be involved in disease, but there was little material evidence available to substan­ tiate their conclusions. The classification of diseases into more definite entities, and the subsequent attempt to account .for differences between them, proved of great interest to Americans. As early as the.-1790's there was al- ready considerable discussion of the specif�c· causes of distinct diseases. Although this discussion was made P?ssible, in the long run, by the de­ velopments in disease identification mentioned, a· more immediatemo­ '• tivation was supplied � America by the old controversy over contagion. Whatever the ultiJJlate causal factors might be in such epidemic diseases as were already fairly well-recognized (as yellow fever), how could one account for theirrapid spread? Were they transmitted by humancon­ tacts? Suchquestions could also be asked about vaguely defined con­ cepts (such as ''bilious remittent fe:vers") even before the diseases now known to have been involved were identified. Later, thesharper differentiations already mentioned would become more specWc and mean1ngfal. Another factor creating interest in etiology was the prevalence of great epidemics, notably plague in the seventeenth century, smallpox in the eighteenth, and cholera in the nineteenth. In order to free mankind from
Recommended publications
  • John Hill (1714?–1775) on 'Plant Sleep'
    Annals of Science ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tasc20 John Hill (1714?–1775) on ‘Plant Sleep’: experimental physiology and the limits of comparative analysis Justin Begley To cite this article: Justin Begley (2020): John Hill (1714?–1775) on ‘Plant Sleep’: experimental physiology and the limits of comparative analysis, Annals of Science, DOI: 10.1080/00033790.2020.1813807 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2020.1813807 © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 12 Sep 2020. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tasc20 ANNALS OF SCIENCE https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2020.1813807 John Hill (1714?–1775) on ‘Plant Sleep’: experimental physiology and the limits of comparative analysis Justin Begley Department of Philosophy, History, and Art, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY The phenomenon of ‘plant sleep’–whereby vegetables Received 1 October 2019 rhythmically open and close their leaves or petals in Accepted 18 August 2020 daily cycles – has been a continual source of fascination KEYWORDS for those with botanical interests, from the Portuguese Royal Society; history of physician Cristóbal Acosta and the Italian naturalist botany; John Hill; Prospero Alpini in the sixteenth century to Percy Bysshe experimentation; natural Shelley and Charles Darwin in the nineteenth. But it was history in 1757 that the topic received its earliest systemic treatment on English shores with the prodigious author, botanist, actor, and Royal Society critic John Hill’s The Sleep of Plants, and Cause of Motion in the Sensitive Plant.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophical Transactions, »
    INDEX TO THE PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS, » S e r ie s A, FOR THE YEAR 1898 (VOL. 191). A. Absorption, Change of, produced by Fluorescence (B urke), 87. Aneroid Barometers, Experiments on.—Elastic After-effect; Secular Change; Influence of Temperature (Chree), 441. B. Bolometer, Surface, Construction of (Petavel), 501. Brilliancy, Intrinsic, Law of Variation of, with Temperature (Petavel), 501. Burke (John). On the Change of Absorption produced by Fluorescence, 87. C. Chree (C.). Experiments on Aneroid Barometers at Kew Observatory, and their Discussion, 441. Correlation and Variation, Influence of Random Selection on (Pearson and Filon), 229. Crystals, Thermal Expansion Coefficients, by an Interference Method (Tutton), 313. D. Differential Equations of the Second Order, &c., Memoir on the Integration of; Characteristic Invariant of (Forsyth), 1. 526 INDEX. E. Electric Filters, Testing Efficiency of; Dielectrifying Power of (Kelvin, Maclean, and Galt), 187. Electricity, Diffusion of, from Carbonic Acid Gas to Air; Communication of, from Electrified Steam to Air (Kelvin, Maclean, and Galt), 187. Electrification of Air by Water Jet, Electrified Needle Points, Electrified Flame, &c., at Different Air-pressures; at Different Electrifying Potentials; Loss of Electrification (Kelvin, Maclean, and Galt), 187. Electrolytic Cells, Construction and Calibration of (Veley and Manley), 365. Emissivity of Platinum in Air and other Gases (Petavel), 501. Equations, Laplace's and other, Some New Solutions of, in Mathematical Physics (Forsyth), 1. Evolution, Mathematical Contributions to Theory o f; Influence of Random Selection on the Differentiation of Local Races (Pearson and Filon), 229. F. Filon (L. N. G.) and Pearson (Karl). Mathematical Contributions to the Theory of Evolution.—IV. On the Probable Errors of Frequency Constants and on the Influence of Random Selection on Variation and Correlation, 229.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spontaneous Generation Controversy (340 BCE–1870 CE)
    270 4. Abstraction and Unification ∗ ∗ ∗ “O`uen ˆetes-vous? Que faites-vous? Il faut travailler” (on his death-bed, to his devoted pupils, watching over him). The Spontaneous Generation Controversy (340 BCE–1870 CE) “Omne vivium ex Vivo.” (Latin proverb) Although the theory of spontaneous generation (abiogenesis) can be traced back at least to the Ionian school (600 B.C.), it was Aristotle (384-322 B.C.) who presented the most complete arguments for and the clearest statement of this theory. In his “On the Origin of Animals”, Aristotle states not only that animals originate from other similar animals, but also that living things do arise and always have arisen from lifeless matter. Aristotle’s theory of sponta- neous generation was adopted by the Romans and Neo-Platonic philosophers and, through them, by the early fathers of the Christian Church. With only minor modifications, these philosophers’ ideas on the origin of life, supported by the full force of Christian dogma, dominated the mind of mankind for more that 2000 years. According to this theory, a great variety of organisms could arise from lifeless matter. For example, worms, fireflies, and other insects arose from morning dew or from decaying slime and manure, and earthworms originated from soil, rainwater, and humus. Even higher forms of life could originate spontaneously according to Aristotle. Eels and other kinds of fish came from the wet ooze, sand, slime, and rotting seaweed; frogs and salamanders came from slime. 1846 CE 271 Rather than examining the claims of spontaneous generation more closely, Aristotle’s followers concerned themselves with the production of even more remarkable recipes.
    [Show full text]
  • Narrative and Natural History in the Eighteenth Century
    UCLA UCLA Previously Published Works Title Narrative and natural history in the eighteenth century. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9x51z6qw Journal Studies in history and philosophy of science, 62 ISSN 0039-3681 Author Terrall, Mary Publication Date 2017-04-07 DOI 10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.03.009 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Studies in History and Philosophy of Science xxx (2017) 1e14 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Studies in History and Philosophy of Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/shpsa Narrative and natural history in the eighteenth century Mary Terrall Department of History, Box 951473, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1473, USA article info abstract Article history: In the eighteenth century, natural histories of animals incorporated narratives about animal behaviour Available online xxx and narratives of discovery and experimentation. Naturalists used first-person accounts to link the stories of their scientific investigations to the stories of the animal lives they were studying. Under- Keywords: standing nature depended on narratives that shifted back and forth in any given text between animal and Narrative human, and between individual cases and generalizations about species. This paper explores the uses of Natural history narrative through examples from the work of René-Antoine Ferchault de Réaumur and Abraham René-Antoine de Réaumur Trembley. In all cases, narrative took the genre of natural history well beyond straightforward description Abraham Trembley fi Insects and classi cation. Prose accounts of insect actions and mechanisms worked in tandem with visual Metamorphosis narratives embedded in the accompanying illustrations, where artists developed strategies for repre- senting sequences of minute changes over time.
    [Show full text]
  • A Translation of the Linnaean Dissertation the Invisible World
    BJHS 49(3): 353–382, September 2016. © British Society for the History of Science 2016 doi:10.1017/S0007087416000637 A translation of the Linnaean dissertation The Invisible World JANIS ANTONOVICS* AND JACOBUS KRITZINGER** Abstract. This study presents the first translation from Latin to English of the Linnaean disser- tation Mundus invisibilis or The Invisible World, submitted by Johannes Roos in 1769. The dissertation highlights Linnaeus’s conviction that infectious diseases could be transmitted by living organisms, too small to be seen. Biographies of Linnaeus often fail to mention that Linnaeus was correct in ascribing the cause of diseases such as measles, smallpox and syphilis to living organisms. The dissertation itself reviews the work of many microscopists, especially on zoophytes and insects, marvelling at the many unexpected discoveries. It then discusses and quotes at length the observations of Münchhausen suggesting that spores from fungi causing plant diseases germinate to produce animalcules, an observation that Linnaeus claimed to have confirmed. The dissertation then draws parallels between these findings and the conta- giousness of many human diseases, and urges further studies of this ‘invisible world’ since, as Roos avers, microscopic organisms may cause more destruction than occurs in all wars. Introduction Here we present the first translation from Latin to English of the Linnaean dissertation published in 1767 by Johannes Roos (1745–1828) entitled Dissertatio academica mundum invisibilem, breviter delineatura and republished by Carl Linnaeus (1707– 1778) several years later in the Amoenitates academicae under the title Mundus invisibi- lis or The Invisible World.1 Roos was a student of Linnaeus, and the dissertation is important in highlighting Linnaeus’s conviction that infectious diseases could be trans- mitted by living organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • English Duplicates of Lost Virginia Records
    T iPlCTP \jrIRG by Lot L I B RAHY OF THL UN IVER.SITY Of ILLINOIS 975.5 D4-5"e ILL. HJST. survey Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://archive.org/details/englishduplicateOOdesc English Duplicates of Lost Virginia Records compiled by Louis des Cognets, Jr. © 1958, Louis des Cognets, Jr. P.O. Box 163 Princeton, New Jersey This book is dedicated to my grandmother ANNA RUSSELL des COGNETS in memory of the many years she spent writing two genealogies about her Virginia ancestors \ i FOREWORD This book was compiled from material found in the Public Record Office during the summer of 1957. Original reports sent to the Colonial Office from Virginia were first microfilmed, and then transcribed for publication. Some of the penmanship of the early part of the 18th Century was like copper plate, but some was very hard to decipher, and where the same name was often spelled in two different ways on the same page, the task was all the more difficult. May the various lists of pioneer Virginians contained herein aid both genealogists, students of colonial history, and those who make a study of the evolution of names. In this event a part of my debt to other abstracters and compilers will have been paid. Thanks are due the Staff at the Public Record Office for many heavy volumes carried to my desk, and for friendly assistance. Mrs. William Dabney Duke furnished valuable advice based upon her considerable experience in Virginia research. Mrs .Olive Sheridan being acquainted with old English names was especially suited to the secretarial duties she faithfully performed.
    [Show full text]
  • Article Reference
    Article Abraham Trembley's Strategy of Generosity and the Scope of Celebrity in the Mid-Eighteenth Century RATCLIFF, Marc Abstract Historians of science have long believed that Abraham Trembley's celebrity and impact were attributable chiefly to the incredible regenerative phenomena demonstrated by the polyp, which he discovered in 1744, and to the new experimental method he devised to investigate them. This essay shows that experimental method alone cannot account for Trembley's success and influence; nor are the marvels of the polyp sufficient to explain its scientific and cultural impact. Experimental method was but one element in a new conception of the laboratory that called for both experimental and para-experimental skills whose public availability depended on a new style of communication. The strategy of generosity that led Trembley to dispatch polyps everywhere enabled experimental naturalist laboratories to spread throughout Europe, and the free circulation of living objects for scientific research led practitioners to establish an experimental field distinct from mechanical physics. Scholars reacted to the marvels of the polyp by strengthening the boundaries between the public and academic spheres and, in consequence, opened a space for [...] Reference RATCLIFF, Marc. Abraham Trembley's Strategy of Generosity and the Scope of Celebrity in the Mid-Eighteenth Century. Isis, 2004, vol. 95, no. 4, p. 555-575 Available at: http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:37207 Disclaimer: layout of this document may differ from the published version. 1 / 1 Abraham Trembley’s Strategy of Generosity and the Scope of Celebrity in the Mid-Eighteenth Century By Marc J. Ratcliff* ABSTRACT Historians of science have long believed that Abraham Trembley’s celebrity and impact were attributable chiefly to the incredible regenerative phenomena demonstrated by the polyp, which he discovered in 1744, and to the new experimental method he devised to investigate them.
    [Show full text]
  • Paradigm Shifts in Biology of the 19Th Century - "Theory of Natural Selection" by Darwin and "Negation of Spontaneous Generation Theory" by Pasteur
    Paradigm shifts in biology of the 19th century - "Theory of natural selection" by Darwin and "Negation of spontaneous generation theory" by Pasteur Here I will briefly describe the history of the theory on the origin of species. Until recently, the majority of naturalists believed that all species were invariable and created separately. This view has been maintained eloquently by many writers. However, only a small number of naturalists believed that species were subject to transformation, and the existing life forms are the true descendants of preceding generations of preceding forms of life. (Charles Darwin “The Origin of Species” p. 1) As you go down the chain of animals from the most complete to the most incomplete, we are faced with the singular situation of the gradual degradation in the configuration of the system - it is natural that I should think that the various life forms produced by life are born in sequence, developing from the simplest form to the most structured form. (Jean Baptiste Lamarck, “Animal Philosophy”, p. 8) How could a material transform to a living organism by itself. In other words, could a living form come into existence without parent and without ancestors? That is the problem that requires a solution. Actually it must be said that the belief in spontaneous generation has been the belief of many eras. It was believed in ancient times and it is debated more and more in modern times. What I am rebutting is this belief. (Louis Pasteur, “Consideration of Spontaneous Generation Theory”) 1 This chapter will describe the outline of the paradigm shift experienced by 20th century physics and 19th century biology.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Fellows of the Royal Society 1660 – 2007
    Library and Information Services List of Fellows of the Royal Society 1660 – 2007 A - J Library and Information Services List of Fellows of the Royal Society 1660 - 2007 A complete listing of all Fellows and Foreign Members since the foundation of the Society A - J July 2007 List of Fellows of the Royal Society 1660 - 2007 The list contains the name, dates of birth and death (where known), membership type and date of election for all Fellows of the Royal Society since 1660, including the most recently elected Fellows (details correct at July 2007) and provides a quick reference to around 8,000 Fellows. It is produced from the Sackler Archive Resource, a biographical database of Fellows of the Royal Society since its foundation in 1660. Generously funded by Dr Raymond R Sackler, Hon KBE, and Mrs Beverly Sackler, the Resource offers access to information on all Fellows of the Royal Society since the seventeenth century, from key characters in the evolution of science to fascinating lesser- known figures. In addition to the information presented in this list, records include details of a Fellow’s education, career, participation in the Royal Society and membership of other societies. Citations and proposers have been transcribed from election certificates and added to the online archive catalogue and digital images of the certificates have been attached to the catalogue records. This list is also available in electronic form via the Library pages of the Royal Society web site: www.royalsoc.ac.uk/library Contributions of biographical details on any Fellow would be most welcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Sciences
    A Comprehensive Book on Environmentalism Table of Contents Chapter 1 - Introduction to Environmentalism Chapter 2 - Environmental Movement Chapter 3 - Conservation Movement Chapter 4 - Green Politics Chapter 5 - Environmental Movement in the United States Chapter 6 - Environmental Movement in New Zealand & Australia Chapter 7 - Free-Market Environmentalism Chapter 8 - Evangelical Environmentalism Chapter 9 -WT Timeline of History of Environmentalism _____________________ WORLD TECHNOLOGIES _____________________ A Comprehensive Book on Enzymes Table of Contents Chapter 1 - Introduction to Enzyme Chapter 2 - Cofactors Chapter 3 - Enzyme Kinetics Chapter 4 - Enzyme Inhibitor Chapter 5 - Enzymes Assay and Substrate WT _____________________ WORLD TECHNOLOGIES _____________________ A Comprehensive Introduction to Bioenergy Table of Contents Chapter 1 - Bioenergy Chapter 2 - Biomass Chapter 3 - Bioconversion of Biomass to Mixed Alcohol Fuels Chapter 4 - Thermal Depolymerization Chapter 5 - Wood Fuel Chapter 6 - Biomass Heating System Chapter 7 - Vegetable Oil Fuel Chapter 8 - Methanol Fuel Chapter 9 - Cellulosic Ethanol Chapter 10 - Butanol Fuel Chapter 11 - Algae Fuel Chapter 12 - Waste-to-energy and Renewable Fuels Chapter 13 WT- Food vs. Fuel _____________________ WORLD TECHNOLOGIES _____________________ A Comprehensive Introduction to Botany Table of Contents Chapter 1 - Botany Chapter 2 - History of Botany Chapter 3 - Paleobotany Chapter 4 - Flora Chapter 5 - Adventitiousness and Ampelography Chapter 6 - Chimera (Plant) and Evergreen Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • Abraham Trembley's Influence on the Development of the Aquatic Microscope
    Abraham Trembley's influence on the development of the aquatic microscope Autor(en): Archinard, M. Objekttyp: Article Zeitschrift: Archives des sciences et compte rendu des séances de la Société Band (Jahr): 38 (1985) Heft 3 PDF erstellt am: 04.10.2021 Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-740484 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich sind. Ein Dienst der ETH-Bibliothek ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092 Zürich, Schweiz, www.library.ethz.ch http://www.e-periodica.ch Arch. Sc. Genève Vol. 38 Fase. 3 pp. 335-344 1985 ABRAHAM TREMBLEY'S INFLUENCE ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE AQUATIC MICROSCOPE BY M. ARCHINARD INTRODUCTION Any discussion touching on the history of scientific discoveries would not be complete without a consideration of the instruments employed in making those discoveries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Royal Society of Arts and Incentives for Innovation, 1750-1850
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES PRESTIGE AND PROFIT: THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF ARTS AND INCENTIVES FOR INNOVATION, 1750-1850 B. Zorina Khan Working Paper 23042 http://www.nber.org/papers/w23042 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 January 2017 I have benefited greatly from discussions with Ran Abramitsky, Steve Broadberry, Neil Cummins, Naomi Lamoreaux, Tom Nicholas, Patrick O’Brien, and Leigh Shaw-Taylor, as well as with seminar participants at Cambridge University and the Society for the History of Technology. Esther Brubaker provided invaluable assistance with the compilation and analysis of the data. I am grateful for the support of the National Science Foundation, the Center for the Protection of Intellectual Property, the Hoover National Fellows Programme, and the IP2 Center at Stanford University. Thanks are especially due to the Economic History Group at the London School of Economics, which provided a supportive and stimulating environment during the completion of this project. Liability for errors is limited to the author. The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2017 by B. Zorina Khan. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Prestige and Profit: The Royal Society of Arts and Incentives for Innovation, 1750-1850 B.
    [Show full text]