Polk County Water Providers Regional Water Supply Strategy Table of Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Polk County Water Providers Regional Water Supply Strategy Table of Contents Regional Water Supply Strategy Final Report January 2005 Presented to: Polk County W ater Providers Prepared by: 111 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 1670 Portland, regon 97204 (503) 223-3033 Acknowledgments The individuals listed below volunteered there time and knowledge to aid in the development of this document. The Polk County Community Development Department thanks the members of the Technical Advisory Committee, Agency Participants, and County Commissioners for their efforts. POLK COUNTY TECHNCIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Committee Members Ralph Blanchard, Chair, Tanglewood Area Ray Hobson, Vice Chair, Perrydale Water Howard Pope, Luckiamute Water and interested public Jay Lugenbill, Rickreall Water Mel Wheeler, Rock Creek Water Karl Ekstrom, Grand Ronde Water Gary Wilson, Monmouth Russ Cooper, Monmouth Fred Braun, Dallas Mike Danko, Independence Jim Minard, City of Adair Village Eric Scott, Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Mark Lyons, Buell-Red Prairie Water Ginger Lindekugel, Falls City Other Agency participants Bill Fujii, Water Resources Department Jackie Hastings and Jill Elliott, Polk Soil and Water Conservation District Deborah Topp, Rickreall Watershed Council Jeff Hecksel, City Manager, Monmouth Greg Ellis, City Manager, Independence Roger Jordan, City Manager, Dallas Polk County Commissioners Mike Propes Phil Walker Tom Ritchey Ron Dodge Prepared by HDR/EES Randy Goff Wade Hathhorn, Ph.D., P.E. Ryan Beaver, P.E. Donna Strahm Betsy Leatham Acknowledgements i Polk County Water Providers Regional Water Supply Strategy Table of Contents Section 1 – Executive Summary 1.1 Objectives.........................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Overview..........................................................................................................................1-1 1.3 Projected Water Supply Deficiencies ..............................................................................1-2 1.4 Supply Strategies..............................................................................................................1-5 1.5 Phased Capital Plans ........................................................................................................1-7 1.6 Wholesale Rate Estimates................................................................................................1-8 1.7 Administrative Options..................................................................................................1-10 1.8 Next Steps ......................................................................................................................1-11 Section 2 – Background Information 2.1 Introduction......................................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Study Objectives ..............................................................................................................2-2 2.3 General Approach............................................................................................................2-2 2.3.1 Analysis of Water Supply Alternatives................................................................2-2 2.3.2 Refinement of Selected Alternatives....................................................................2-4 Section 3 – Regional Demand for Water 3.1 Introduction......................................................................................................................3-1 3.2 Regional Population Projections ......................................................................................3-1 3.3 Summary of Present Water Use.......................................................................................3-3 3.4 Water Demand Projections ..............................................................................................3-5 3.5 Distribution of Regional Demand ....................................................................................3-6 Section 4 – Future Needs Analysis 4.1 Introduction......................................................................................................................4-1 4.2 Summary of Existing Water Rights .................................................................................4-1 4.2.1 General Access to Supplies..................................................................................4-1 4.2.2 City of Adair Village Water Rights .....................................................................4-2 4.3 Available Water Supplies.................................................................................................4-3 4.4 Regional Water Supply Deficiencies ...............................................................................4-5 4.5 Geographical Distribution of Need..................................................................................4-7 4.6 Distribution of Regional Demand ....................................................................................4-7 Table of Contents i Polk County Water Providers Regional Water Supply Strategy Table of Contents Section 5 – Supply Strategies 5.1 Introduction......................................................................................................................5-1 5.2 Water Supply Alternatives...............................................................................................5-1 5.2.1 General Water Supply Conditions .......................................................................5-1 5.2.2 Willamette River..................................................................................................5-2 5.2.3 Surface Water Storage .........................................................................................5-5 5.2.4 Groundwater.........................................................................................................5-6 5.2.5 Conservation and Reuse.......................................................................................5-6 5.2.6 Other Options .......................................................................................................5-9 5.3 Select Evaluation Criteria ................................................................................................5-9 5.4 Comparison of Supply Alternatives...............................................................................5-12 5.4.1 Comparative Analysis........................................................................................5-12 5.4.2 Summary of Cost Estimates...............................................................................5-16 5.5 Other Considerations......................................................................................................5-17 Section 6 – Phased Capital Plan and Pre-Design 6.1 Introduction......................................................................................................................6-1 6.2 Incremental Supply Plan..................................................................................................6-1 6.3 Alternative WR-1 (Adair Village WTP)..........................................................................6-2 6.3.1 Treatment .............................................................................................................6-2 6.3.2 Raw Water Transmission.....................................................................................6-3 6.3.3 Finished Water Transmission..............................................................................6-3 6.3.4 Pumping ...............................................................................................................6-4 6.3.5 Storage .................................................................................................................6-5 6.3.6 Phased Capital Plan..............................................................................................6-5 6.4 Alternative WR-2 (Regional WTP) .................................................................................6-7 6.4.1 Treatment .............................................................................................................6-7 6.4.2 Raw Water Transmission.....................................................................................6-8 6.4.3 Finished Water Transmission..............................................................................6-9 6.4.4 Pumping ...............................................................................................................6-9 6.4.5 Storage ...............................................................................................................6-10 6.4.6 Phased Capital Plan............................................................................................6-10 6.5 Distribution to Area Water Providers ............................................................................6-12 6.5.1 Description.........................................................................................................6-12 6.5.2 Summary............................................................................................................6-16 Table of Contents ii Polk County Water Providers Regional Water Supply Strategy Table of Contents Section 7 – Wholesale Rate Estimate 7.1 Introduction......................................................................................................................7-1 7.2 Overview of the Rate Study Process................................................................................7-1 7.3 Global Principles around which
Recommended publications
  • In Partial Fulfillment Of
    WATER UTILI AT'ION AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE 11ILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN by CAST" IR OLISZE "SKI A THESIS submitted to OREGON STATE COLLEGE in partialfulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE June 1954 School Graduate Committee Data thesis is presented_____________ Typed by Kate D. Humeston TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. INTRODUCTION Statement and History of the Problem........ 1 Historical Data............................. 3 Procedure Used to Explore the Data.......... 4 Organization of the Data.................... 8 II. THE WILLAMETTE RIVER WATERSHED Orientation................................. 10 Orography................................... 10 Geology................................. 11 Soil Types................................. 19 Climate ..................................... 20 Precipitation..*.,,,,,,,................... 21 Storms............'......................... 26 Physical Characteristics of the River....... 31 Physical Characteristics of the Major Tributaries............................ 32 Surface Water Supply ........................ 33 Run-off Characteristics..................... 38 Discharge Records........ 38 Ground Water Supply......................... 39 CHAPTER PAGE III. ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL UTILIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT.. .... .................... 44 Flood Characteristics ........................ 44 Flood History......... ....................... 45 Provisional Standard Project: Flood......... 45 Flood Plain......... ........................ 47 Flood Control................................ 48 Drainage............
    [Show full text]
  • Willamette River Basin Above the Luckiamute River
    312 123o 30' 121o 45' 44o 45' 14174000 Albany BENTON Corvallis Philomath WILLAMETTE 14171000 Monroe Smith 14158500 LINN 14158790 14170000 River Harrisburg R RIVER 14158795 14166000 Blue 14158850 River 14161500 Rainbow Belknap Springs Vida Tom River Blue 14169000 Alvador 14163150 River 14159500 14165000 Leaburg 14162500 14162200 Noti Middle McKenzieWalterville Long 14159110 Elmira Eugene 14164700 14163900 South 14166500 14152000 14159200 Goshen Fall 14151000 Fal l Cr 14157500 Jasper Creek Fork 14150000 14150800 Fork Dexter Lowell Fork Coast Cottage 14155500 Grove 14148000 14154500 Oakridge 14153500 Row Dorena 14145500 River Willamette 43o 30' River 0 10 20 30 MILES 0 10 20 30 KILOMETERS EXPLANATION 14158795 Stream-gaging station OREGON 14162400 Water-quality data collection site 14166000 Stream-gaging station and water-quality data collection site Figure 21. Location of surface-water and water-quality stations in the Willamette River Basin upstream from the Luckiamute River. 313 COAST See Figure 23. WILLAMETTE RIVER FORK 14152000 RM 195.0 North Fork 14151000 Fall Creek RM 6.1 Lake Fall Creek RM Fall 198.3 Creek 14150800 Completed RM 4.4 1965 Winberry Creek 14150000 RM 201.2 Lookout Point Lake Completed 1954 14148000 RM 220.2 RM North Fork of Middle Fork Willamette River 224.4 RM Salmon Creek 229.4 RM Salt Creek 231.0 14145500 RM 231.4 EXPLANATION Hills Creek Lake 14152000 Stream-gaging station 14152000 Completed Stream-gaging station and water-quality 1961 data collection site RM 201.2 River mile Stream—Arrow shows direction of flow Windfall RM Creek 240.6 MIDDLE FORK WILLAMETTE RIVER Figure 22. Schematic diagram showing gaging stations in the Middle Fork Willamette River Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • The Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon
    The Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon Public Works Department Phone (503) 879-2400 9615 Grand Ronde Road Fax (503) 879-2196 Grand Ronde, Oregon 97347 Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon and State of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Order On Consent Effective August 15, 2019 DEQ No. 19-12 Quarterly Progress Report Dated August 15, 2020 Per Section 5(H) of the above-referenced PPA, the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon (“CTGR”) hereby submits Quarterly Progress Report #4. The schedule per the PPA Scope of Work (SOW), is as follows: The remedial actions will be phased to address higher priority areas first (identified above) and immediate redevelopment needs. Lower priority objectives, such as abatement or containment of non- friable hazardous building materials, removal or capping of onsite contamination determined not to be an immediate threat to human health or the environment, and areas associated with longer term redevelopment horizons, would be addressed as funding becomes available and redevelopment of the property occurs. A conceptual/flexible timeline for redevelopment of the property, including for the associated environmental investigations and remediation needed to facilitate the planned phased development will be prepared. Such timeline is anticipated to consist of: 1. Prepare an Initial Summary Report within 60 days from date of signed Consent Order. The report will summarize previous environmental investigations. It shall include at a minimum, a screening of site data against risk-based criteria, a conceptual site model (including a conceptual site hydrogeologic model), a discussion of data gaps needed to complete a site characterization in accordance OAR 340-122-0080, identification of potential interim remedial measures, source control recommendations, and conclusions.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Water Resources of the Grand Ronde Area, Oregon
    Assessment of the Water Resources of the Grand Ronde Area, Oregon U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 97-4040 Prepared in cooperation with the CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE GRAND RONDE COMMUNITY OF OREGON Assessment of the Water Resources of the Grand Ronde Area, Oregon By Kathleen A. McCarthy, John C. Risley, Rodney R. Caldwell, and William D. McFarland U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 97 4040 Prepared in cooperation with the CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE GRAND RONDE COMMUNITY OF OREGON Portland, Oregon 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information Copies of this report can write to: be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey, WRD Branch of Information Services 10615 S.E. Cherry Blossom Drive Box 25286 Portland, Oregon 97216 Federal Center E-mail: [email protected] Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Abstract ..................................................................................................................................................................^ 1 Introduction......................................................................................^ 1 Purpose and Scope..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Click Here to Download the 4Th Grade Curriculum
    Copyright © 2014 The Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Community of Oregon. All rights reserved. All materials in this curriculum are copyrighted as designated. Any republication, retransmission, reproduction, or sale of all or part of this curriculum is prohibited. Introduction Welcome to the Grand Ronde Tribal History curriculum unit. We are thankful that you are taking the time to learn and teach this curriculum to your class. This unit has truly been a journey. It began as a pilot project in the fall of 2013 that was brought about by the need in Oregon schools for historically accurate and culturally relevant curriculum about Oregon Native Americans and as a response to countless requests from Oregon teachers for classroom- ready materials on Native Americans. The process of creating the curriculum was a Tribal wide effort. It involved the Tribe’s Education Department, Tribal Library, Land and Culture Department, Public Affairs, and other Tribal staff. The project would not have been possible without the support and direction of the Tribal Council. As the creation was taking place the Willamina School District agreed to serve as a partner in the project and allow their fourth grade teachers to pilot it during the 2013-2014 academic year. It was also piloted by one teacher from the Pleasant Hill School District. Once teachers began implementing the curriculum, feedback was received regarding the effectiveness of lesson delivery and revisions were made accordingly. The teachers allowed Tribal staff to visit during the lessons to observe how students responded to the curriculum design and worked after school to brainstorm new strategies for the lessons and provide insight from the classroom teacher perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2018 Vol. 40, No. 4
    Fall 2018 Vol. 40, No. 4 Highlights from the 24th Annual Summer Classic in Seaside PAGES 5–7 MARK YOUR CALENDAR: Conferences in Grande Ronde, Hood River, and Sunriver PAGE 19 A publication of Oregon Association of Water Utilities Read H2Oregon online at www.oawu.net Smart Solutions. SmartClean Solutions. Water. Clean Water. tag-inc.us 541.359.3755tag-inc.us 541.359.3755 On-Call Technicians Available 24 hours / 7 days a week. On-Call Technicians Available 24 hours / 7 days a week. 541-359-3755 www.tag-inc.us 541-359-3755 www.tag-inc.us Fall 2018 Vol. 40, No. 4 U CONTENTS V Member Benefits and Services by Jason Green, Executive Director .............................................................3–4 WANTED OAWU’s Annual Golf Scramble ...................................................................................................................................5 OAWU’s Summer Classic 2018 in Seaside, Oregon ........................................................................................ 6–7 Your photos and articles for inclusion in H2Oregon. OAWU requests your best Personal ERP Situation by Hans Schroeder, Circuit Rider ....................................................................................8 photos of Oregon water scenery for our Deadlines by Heath Cokeley, Programs Manager/Circuit Rider ..................................................................10–11 magazine covers and artwork! OAWU Services by Scott Berry, Operations Manager ....................................................................................12–13
    [Show full text]
  • Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde: a Look at Where They Were 100 Years Ago and Where They Are Today
    Linfield University DigitalCommons@Linfield 2012 Yamhill Enrichment Society (YES) Internships Yamhill Enrichment Society (YES) Internships 5-15-2012 Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde: A Look at where They Were 100 Years Ago and where They Are Today Ashley Burgess Linfield College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.linfield.edu/yes_2012 Recommended Citation Burgess, Ashley, "Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde: A Look at where They Were 100 Years Ago and where They Are Today" (2012). 2012 Yamhill Enrichment Society (YES) Internships. Presentation. Submission 2. https://digitalcommons.linfield.edu/yes_2012/2 This Presentation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It is brought to you for free via open access, courtesy of DigitalCommons@Linfield, with permission from the rights-holder(s). Your use of this Presentation must comply with the Terms of Use for material posted in DigitalCommons@Linfield, or with other stated terms (such as a Creative Commons license) indicated in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, or if you have questions about permitted uses, please contact [email protected]. Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde A look at where they were a 100 years ago and where they are today Ashley Burgess Y.E.S. Internship Spring 2012 Pre History Land Management • Traditional methods • The earth provided all that was needed • Fire as only means of “management” • Instrumental in hunting, harvesting, and regrowth of vegetation • “Long, long ago it was good country (had beer hunting and food gathering). They were all Indians who lived in this countryside. Everything was good.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 588-Aug. 13, 1954 [68 St At
    724 PUBLIC LAW 588-AUG. 13, 1954 [68 ST AT. Public Law 588 CHAPTER 733 August 13, 1954 AN ACT [S. 2746] To provide for the termination of Federal supervision over the property of certain tribes and bands of Indians located in western Oregon and the indi­ vidual members thereof, and for other purposes. Be it enmted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the Oregon Indians. Termination o f United States of America in Congress assembled^ That the purpose Federal super - of this Act is to provide for the termination of Federal supervision vision. over the trust and restricted property of certain tribes and bands of Indians located in western Oregon and the individual members thereof, for the disposition of federally owned property acquired or withdrawn for the administration of the affairs of such Indians, and for a termination of Federal services furnished such Indians because of their status as Indians. Definitions. SEC. 2. For the purposes of this Act: (a) "Tribe" means any of the tribes, bands, groups, or communities of Indians located west of the Cascade Mountains in Oregon, including the following: Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community, Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians, Alsea, Applegate Creek, Cala- pooya, Chaftan, Chempho, Chetco, Chetlessington, Chinook, Clacka­ mas, Clatskanie, Clatsop, Clowwewalla, Coos, Cow Creek, Euchees, Galic Creek, Grave, Joshua, Karok, Kathlamet, Kusotony, Kwatami or Sixes, Lakmiut, Long Tom Creek, Lower Coquille, Lower Umpqua, Maddy, Mackanotin, Mary's River, Multnomah, Munsel Creek, Nal- tunnetunne, Nehalem, Nestucca, Northern Molalla, Port Orford, Pud­ ding River, Rogue River, Salmon River, Santiam, Scoton, Shasta, Shasta Costa, Siletz, Siuslaw, Skiloot, Southern Molalla, Takelma, Tillamook, Tolowa, Tualatin, Tututui, Upper Coquille, Upper Ump­ qua, Willamette Tumwater, Yamhill, Yaquina, and Yoncalla; (b) "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Interior, (c) "Lands" means real property, interest therein, or improve­ ments thereon, and includes water rights.
    [Show full text]
  • The Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon
    The Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon Education Division (503) 879-2275 FAX (503) 879-2286 9615 Grand Ronde Road 1-800-422-0232 Ext. 2275 Grand Ronde, OR 97347 Umpqua Molalla Rogue River Kalapuya Chasta PART-TIME COLLEGE PROGRAM APPLICATION The Grand Ronde Education Division administers education and training programs that are designed to assist tribal members in obtaining educational training that will lead to employment opportunities. The Part Time College (PTC) program is intended to: Provide educational opportunities to individuals who take classes at accredited non-profit colleges and universities.. Provide educational opportunities to individuals who apply to a degree program as they work towards completion on a part-time attendance basis. Provide funding for tuition, fees, books and supplies per applicant not to exceed the following: for Two-year/Community College students: $1,600 per quarter or $2,400 per semester, not to exceed $4,800 per academic year. And Four-year/University students: $2,400 per quarter or $3,600 per semester, not to exceed $7,200 per academic year. And for Graduate (500-level and higher coursework) students: $3,200 per quarter or $4,800 per semester, not to exceed $9,600 per academic year. Additional funding is available to support summer session coursework ($1,600 at two-year school, $2,400 at four-year universities, and $3,200 for graduate students). Individuals can attend classes/training in the classroom, individualized study, telecourses on videotape, online courses, television
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution and Relative Abundance of Spawning and Larval Pacific Lamprey in the Willamette River Basin
    The distribution and relative abundance of spawning and larval Pacific lamprey in the Willamette River Basin Final Report to the Columbia Inter-Tribal Fish Commission for project years 2011-2014 May 2014 Prepared by Luke Schultz1* Mariah P. Mayfield1, 2 Gabriel T. Sheoships1 Lance A. Wyss3 Benjamin J. Clemens4 Brandon Chasco5 and Carl B. Schreck6 (P.I.) CRITFC Contract number C13-11 Fiscal Year 2013 (May 1, 2013-April 30, 2014) BPA Contract number 60877 BPA Project number 2008-524-00 1Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, U. S. Geological Survey, 104 Nash Hall, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331 *E-mail: [email protected]; phone: 541-737-1964 2current address: Rural Aquaculture Promotion, Peace Corps, Lusaka, Zambia 3current address: Calapooia, North Santiam, and South Santiam Watershed Councils Brownsville, OR 4current address: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Salem, OR Corvallis, OR 97331 5Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, 104 Nash Hall, Oregon State University 6USGS, Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, 104 Nash Hall Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331. [email protected] Acknowledgements Funding for this study was provided by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission through the Columbia Basin Fish Accords partnership with the Bonneville Power Administration under project 2008-524-00, Brian McIlraith, project manager. Fieldwork assistance was generously provided by J. Doyle, B. Gregorie, B. McIlraith, K. Kuhn, V. Mayfield, R. McCoun, J. Sáenz, L. Schwabe, K. McDonnell and C. Christianson. B. Heinith, J. Peterson, B. Gerth, G. Giannico, J. Jolley, G.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Water Supply Strategy Final Report January 2005
    Regional Water Supply Strategy Final Report January 2005 Presented to: Polk County W ater Providers Prepared by: 111 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 1670 Portland, regon 97204 (503) 223-3033 Acknowledgments The individuals listed below volunteered there time and knowledge to aid in the development of this document. The Polk County Community Development Department thanks the members of the Technical Advisory Committee, Agency Participants, and County Commissioners for their efforts. POLK COUNTY TECHNCIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Committee Members Ralph Blanchard, Chair, Tanglewood Area Ray Hobson, Vice Chair, Perrydale Water Howard Pope, Luckiamute Water and interested public Jay Lugenbill, Rickreall Water Mel Wheeler, Rock Creek Water Karl Ekstrom, Grand Ronde Water Gary Wilson, Monmouth Russ Cooper, Monmouth Fred Braun, Dallas Mike Danko, Independence Jim Minard, City of Adair Village Eric Scott, Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Mark Lyons, Buell-Red Prairie Water Ginger Lindekugel, Falls City Other Agency participants Bill Fujii, Water Resources Department Jackie Hastings and Jill Elliott, Polk Soil and Water Conservation District Deborah Topp, Rickreall Watershed Council Jeff Hecksel, City Manager, Monmouth Greg Ellis, City Manager, Independence Roger Jordan, City Manager, Dallas Polk County Commissioners Mike Propes Phil Walker Tom Ritchey Ron Dodge Prepared by HDR/EES Randy Goff Wade Hathhorn, Ph.D., P.E. Ryan Beaver, P.E. Donna Strahm Betsy Leatham Acknowledgements i Polk County Water Providers Regional Water Supply Strategy Table of Contents
    [Show full text]
  • 'Visionaries' Unveiled
    PRESORTED STANDARD MAIL U.S. POSTAGE PAID PORTLAND, OR PERMIT NO. 700 First Foods Celebration held — pg. 8 JULY 15, 2019 Election season officially begins Seven candidates vying for Tribal Council By Dean Rhodes Smoke Signals editor hree incumbents and four challengers were nominat- Ted to run for Tribal Council during the General Council meeting held Sunday, June 30, in the Tribal Community Center. Incumbents Kathleen George, De- nise Harvey and Jack Giffen Jr. are running to retain their seats while former Tribal Council Chairman Reyn Leno is seeking to rejoin coun- cil after a two-year break in service. Tribal members Peter Grout, Lewis Younger and Victor Cureton are all seeking their first terms on Tribal Council. George, 47, is running for her second term after leading the pack in 2016 with 624 votes. She was Photo by Timothy J. Gonzalez nominated by fellow Tribal Council Salem Signs fabricator Mychal Pond and Parks Bronze owner Steve Parks prepare the “Visionaries” statue member Michael Langley. honoring Restoration figures Marvin Kimsey, Margaret Provost and Merle Holmes to be lifted by a crane for its Harvey, 57, is seeking her third installation in front of the Governance Center on Tuesday, July 2. term on Tribal Council. In 2013, she was the top vote-getter with 444 votes and was re-elected in 2016 with 557 votes. She was nominat- ed by Tribal Council Chairwoman ‘Visionaries’ unveiled Cheryle A. Kennedy. Giffen, 67, is seeking his sixth Bronze sculpture honors three Restoration leaders term on Tribal Council, having served from 2003 to ’09 and then By Danielle Frost Tribal Council Chairwoman Cheryle A.
    [Show full text]