Short Communications
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Breeding Biology of the White-Winged Nightjar (Eleothreptus Candicans) in Eastern Paraguay
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia, 22(2), 219-233 ARTICLE June 2014 Breeding biology of the White-winged Nightjar (Eleothreptus candicans) in eastern Paraguay Robert G. Pople Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, UK. Email: [email protected] Current address: BirdLife International, Wellbrook Court, Girton Road, Cambridge, CB3 0NA, UK. Received on 03 September 2013. Accepted on 02 October 2013. ABSTRACT: Breeding biology of the White-winged Nightjar (Eleothreptus candicans) in eastern Paraguay. I present the first detailed description of the breeding biology of the White-winged Nightjar (Eleothreptus candicans), based on data collected over three breeding seasons during 1998-2001 at Aguará Ñu, Canindeyú, eastern Paraguay. Male nightjars defended small territories situated on the upper slopes of ridgelines. Each territory contained one or more “display arenas” at which the male performed nuptial display flights. Aggregation indices confirmed that the primary display arenas of males were significantly clustered within the survey area. Within their territories, males apparently selected display arenas on the basis of their structural characteristics: mounds used as arenas were significantly lower and broader than random mounds. Males engaged in display activity from late August to early January. On average, males performed 0.54 ± 0.04 display flights per minute during nocturnal focal watches, but there was considerable intra-male variation in display rate. Following a burst of activity immediately after their arrival at display arenas at dusk, male display rate was best explained by ambient levels of moonlight. Males produced a previously undescribed insect-like “tik tik” call when inactive on their territories. -
An Update of Wallacels Zoogeographic Regions of the World
REPORTS To examine the temporal profile of ChC produc- specification of a distinct, and probably the last, 3. G. A. Ascoli et al., Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 557 (2008). tion and their correlation to laminar deployment, cohort in this lineage—the ChCs. 4. J. Szentágothai, M. A. Arbib, Neurosci. Res. Program Bull. 12, 305 (1974). we injected a single pulse of BrdU into pregnant A recent study demonstrated that progeni- CreER 5. P. Somogyi, Brain Res. 136, 345 (1977). Nkx2.1 ;Ai9 females at successive days be- tors below the ventral wall of the lateral ventricle 6. L. Sussel, O. Marin, S. Kimura, J. L. Rubenstein, tween E15 and P1 to label mitotic progenitors, (i.e., VGZ) of human infants give rise to a medial Development 126, 3359 (1999). each paired with a pulse of tamoxifen at E17 to migratory stream destined to the ventral mPFC 7. S. J. Butt et al., Neuron 59, 722 (2008). + 18 8. H. Taniguchi et al., Neuron 71, 995 (2011). label NKX2.1 cells (Fig. 3A). We first quanti- ( ). Despite species differences in the develop- 9. L. Madisen et al., Nat. Neurosci. 13, 133 (2010). fied the fraction of L2 ChCs (identified by mor- mental timing of corticogenesis, this study and 10. J. Szabadics et al., Science 311, 233 (2006). + phology) in mPFC that were also BrdU+. Although our findings raise the possibility that the NKX2.1 11. A. Woodruff, Q. Xu, S. A. Anderson, R. Yuste, Front. there was ChC production by E15, consistent progenitors in VGZ and their extended neurogenesis Neural Circuits 3, 15 (2009). -
Chrysococcyx Lucidus) in New Zealand
249 Notornis, 2013, Vol. 60: 249-251 0029-4470 © The Ornithological Society of New Zealand, Inc. SHORT NOTE Observation of food presentation behaviour between individual shining cuckoos (Chrysococcyx lucidus) in New Zealand M.N.H. SEABROOK-DAVISON* M.G. ANDERSON Ecology, Behaviour and Conservation Group, Institute of Natural and Mathematical Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 102904, Auckland 0745, New Zealand Little is known about courtship behaviour in the ensure a rapid onset of breeding condition in female shining cuckoo (Chrysococcyx lucidus) (also known cuckoos. as Chalcites lucidus) and whether males feed females The shining cuckoo is an obligate specialist brood as occurs in a number of other species. Although parasite that only uses the grey warbler (Gerygone there have been a number of observations of male igata) as a host species on the main islands of New Chrysococcyx cuckoos feeding suspected conspecific Zealand (Heather & Robertson 1996; Gill 1983b) and fledglings (Moreau 1944; Friedmann 1968; Iversen the Chatham Island warbler (Gerygone albofrontata) & Hill 1983; Lovette et al. 2006), more recently it on the Chatham Is (Dennison et al. 1984). Little has been suggested that these were misdirected has been recorded of the courtship behaviour of courtship feeding or the observers misidentified the shining cuckoo. Seabrook-Davison et al. (2008) adult female cuckoos as fledglings (Lorenzana described pre-copulatory behaviour and copulation & Sealy 1998; Davies 2000). If this is the case, in a pair of shining cuckoos at Coatesville, 28 km these observations may be indicative of courtship north of Auckland, New Zealand. This behaviour behaviours and that courtship feeding occurs more was observed only once during 5 minute bird-count frequently than previous appreciated. -
Does Coevolution with a Shared Parasite Drive Hosts to Partition Their
Downloaded from http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on August 29, 2017 Does coevolution with a shared parasite rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org drive hosts to partition their defences among species? Eleanor M. Caves1, Martin Stevens2 and Claire N. Spottiswoode1,3 Research 1Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK 2 Cite this article: Caves EM, Stevens M, Centre for Ecology and Conservation, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9FE, UK Spottiswoode CN. 2017 Does coevolution with 3DST-NRF Centre of Excellence at the FitzPatrick Institute, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, a shared parasite drive hosts to partition their South Africa defences among species? Proc. R. Soc. B 284: EMC, 0000-0003-3497-5925; MS, 0000-0001-7768-3426; CNS, 0000-0003-3232-9559 20170272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0272 When mimicry imposes costs on models, selection may drive the model’s phenotype to evolve away from its mimic. For example, brood parasitism often drives hosts to diversify in egg appearance among females within a species, making mimetic parasitic eggs easier to detect. However, when a Received: 9 February 2017 single parasite species exploits multiple host species, parasitism could also Accepted: 19 April 2017 drive host egg evolution away from other co-occurring hosts, to escape suscep- tibility to their respective mimics. This hypothesis predicts that sympatric hosts of the same parasite should partition egg phenotypic space (defined by egg colour, luminance and pattern) among species to avoid one another. We show that eggs of warbler species parasitized by the cuckoo finch Anoma- Subject Category: lospiza imberbis in Zambia partition phenotypic space much more distinctly Evolution than do eggs of sympatric but unparasitized warblers. -
The Collection of Birds from São Tomé and Príncipe at the Instituto De Investigação Científica Tropical of the University of Lisbon (Portugal)
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 600:The 155–167 collection (2016) of birds from São Tomé and Príncipe at the Instituto de Investigação... 155 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.600.7899 DATA PAPER http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research The collection of birds from São Tomé and Príncipe at the Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical of the University of Lisbon (Portugal) Miguel Monteiro1,2, Luís Reino1,2,3, Martim Melo1,4, Pedro Beja1,2, Cristiane Bastos-Silveira5, Manuela Ramos7, Diana Rodrigues5, Isabel Queirós Neves5,6, Susana Consciência8, Rui Figueira1,2 1 CIBIO/InBIO-Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Vairão, Portugal 2 CEABN/InBio, Centro de Ecologia Aplicada “Professor Baeta Neves”, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal 3 CIBIO/InBIO-Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade de Évora, 7004-516 Évora, Portugal 4 Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701X, South Africas 5 Museu Nacional de História Natural e da Ciência, Universidade de Lisboa, Rua da Escola Politécnica 56, 1250-102 Lisboa, Portugal 6 CESAM-Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Universidade de Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal 7 MARE-FCUL, DOP/UAç - Departamento Oceanografia e Pescas, Univ. Açores, Rua Prof. Dr. Fre- derico Machado, 9901-862 Horta, Portugal 8 Estrada de Mem Martins n251 1ºDto, 2725-391 Mem Martins, Sintra, Portugal Corresponding author: Rui Figueira ([email protected]) Academic editor: G. Sangster | Received 29 January 2015 | Accepted 2 June 2016 | Published 22 June 2016 http://zoobank.org/68209E54-00D0-4EFA-B095-AB7D346ACD8E Citation: Monteiro M, Reino L, Melo M, Beja P, Bastos-Silveira C, Ramos M, Rodrigues D, Neves IQ, Consciência S, Figueira R (2016) The collection of birds from São Tomé and Príncipe at the Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropical of the University of Lisbon (Portugal). -
Standards for Ground Feeding Bird Sanctuaries
Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries Standards For Ground Feeding Bird Sanctuaries Version: June 2013 ©2012 Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries i Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries – Standards for Ground Feeding Bird Sanctuaries Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1 GFAS PRINCIPLES 1 ANIMALS COVERED BY THESE STANDARDS 1 STANDARDS UPDATES 2 GROUND FEEDING BIRD STANDARDS 3 GROUND FEEDING BIRD HOUSING 3 H-1. Types of Space and Size 3 H-2. Containment 5 H-3. Ground and Plantings 6 H-4. Gates and Doors 7 H-5. Shelter 8 H-6. Enclosure Furniture 8 H-7. Sanitation 9 H-8. Temperature, Humidity, Ventilation, Lighting 11 PHYSICAL FACILITIES AND ADMINISTRATION 12 PF-1. Overall Safety of Facilities 12 PF-2. Water Drainage and Testing 13 PF-3. Life Support 13 PF-4. Hazardous Materials Handling 13 PF-5. Security: Avian Enclosures 14 PF-6. Perimeter Boundary and Inspections, and Maintenance 14 PF-7. Security: General Safety Monitoring 15 PF-8. Insect and Rodent Control 15 PF-9. Record Keeping 16 PF-10. Animal Transport 16 NUTRITION REQUIREMENTS 18 N-1. Water 18 N-2. Diet 18 N-3. Food Presentation and Feeding Techniques 20 N-4. Food Storage 21 N-5. Food Handling 21 VETERINARY CARE 22 V-1. General Medical Program and Staffing 22 V-2. On-Site and Off-Site Veterinary Facilities 22 V-3. Preventative Medicine Program 23 V-4. Diagnostic Services, Surgical, Treatment and Necropsy Facilities 23 V-5. Quarantine and Isolation of Ground Feeding Birds 25 V-6. Medical Records and Controlled Substances 26 i Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries – Standards for Ground Feeding Bird Sanctuaries V-7. -
Proceedings of the United States National Museum
; PROCEEDINGS OF THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM issued |^5JSv>\.m|^ hy the SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM Vol. 103 Wa.hington : 1955 No. 3335 ON THE ANATOMY AND RELATIONSHIPS OF GLOSSY CUCKOOS OF THE GENERA CHRYSOCOCCYX, LAMPROMORPHA, AND CHALCITES By Andrew J. Berger^ The relationships of the glossy cuckoos have long been in question. Sharpe (1873, p. 579) commented that he could not "find any charac- ter in the genus Chrysococcyx to justify its separation from Cuculus, ." beyond the metallic plumage . Shelley (1891, pp. 280, 288) recognized as distinct the genera Chrysococcyx and Chalcococcyx (= Chalcites), but placed Lampromorpha in synonymy with Chryso- coccyx. Bannerman (1922, pp. 413-420; 1933, pp. 111-120), how- ever, recognized both Lampromorpha and Chrysococcyx. Chapin (1939, pp. 197-201), Peters (1940, p. 29), and Friedmann (1948, p. 115) again placed Lampromorpha in synonymy with Chrysococcyx. Delacour (1951, p. 19) and Friedmann (in litt.) further suggest that the genus Chalcites should be united with Chrysococcyx^ which would place all species of this complex in the genus Chrysococcyx. Little has been written on the internal anatomy of Chrysococcyx and, so far as I know, there has been no published description of the internal anatomy of Lampromorpha or Chalcites. I am indebted to the following for supplying alcoholic and skeletal material : Dr. Dean Amadon, American Museum of Natural History Dr. Herbert Friedmann, United States National Museum; and Mr. John G. Williams, the Coryndon Museum, Nairobi, East Africa. I had the following spirit material for study: Chrysococcyx cupreus (3), Lampromorpha caprius (2), L. Maas (1), and Chalcites 1 Department of Anatomy, University of Mlcbigan Medical Scliool, Ann Arbor, Michigan. -
The Gambia in Style – Photography Special
The Gambia in Style – Photography Special Naturetrek Tour Report 24 November - 1 December 2017 Brown-throated Wattle Eye Diederic Cuckoo Little Bee-eater Pied Kingfisher Report and images by Kevin Elsby Naturetrek Mingledown Barn Wolf's Lane Chawton Alton Hampshire GU34 3HJ UK T: +44 (0)1962 733051 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Tour Report The Gambia in Style – Photography Special Tour participants: Kevin Elsby (leader) with eight Naturetrek clients Day 1 Friday 24th November The group assembled at Gatwick for the 10.30am Titan Air flight to Banjul in the Gambia. After a comfortable 6 ½-hour flight, we met up again in the arrivals area to collect our bags, then change cash into the local currency, before boarding the air-conditioned coach which would take us to the Mandina Lodges, our base for the next seven nights. On arrival, after a 45-minute journey, we were warmly greeted by Linda and her staff and made instantly welcome. The setting for the lodges is truly special being in a natural area of forest adjacent to a tributary of the Gambia river. It has its own landing jetty as part of the property. It was getting dark by the time we arrived and so after a refreshing cold drink we were escorted to our accommodation, where we were able to unpack and prepare for our excellent evening meal, all freshly prepared for us. On our way from the airport to Mandina we were able to pick out a single Yellow-billed Kite and a couple of Hooded Vultures as well five very distinctive Pied Crows. -
Evolution of Bird Eggs in the Absence of Cuckoo Parasitism
Evolution of bird eggs in the absence of cuckoo parasitism David C. Lahti* Museum of Zoology and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Communicated by Richard D. Alexander, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, October 12, 2005 (received for review March 3, 2004) Historical introductions of species into new habitats can create rare weavers in West Africa, and observed their responses. Birds opportunities to test evolutionary hypotheses, such as the role of rejected eggs in proportion to differences in color and spotting natural selection in maintaining traits. This study examines two pattern between the foreign eggs and their own. independent introductions of the African village weaverbird (Plo- To maximize effectiveness of egg rejection behavior as a ceus cucullatus) to islands where selection on egg appearance traits defense against brood parasitism, a village weaver’s eggs should is expected to differ markedly from that of the source populations. possess two features. First, they should be distinctive within the The color and spotting of village weaver eggs in Africa are highly population; weaver eggs should have high between-individual consistent within clutches, but highly variable between individu- variation, as indeed they do in Africa (9, 15). Although no als. These two features may be an evolutionary response to brood quantitative comparative study has yet been performed, the level parasitism. In Africa, weavers are parasitized by each other and by of population variability in egg appearance found in African the diederik cuckoo (Chrysococcyx caprius), an egg mimic. African Ploceus weavers is extreme among birds. The more unusual a village weavers were introduced one century ago to Mauritius, and weaver egg is in its population, the more likely a parasitic egg laid over two centuries ago to Hispaniola. -
Diederik Cuckoo
564 Cuculidae: cuckoos and coucals conditions and the timing of breeding Diederik Cuckoo of hosts, and may consequently differ Diederikkie between years and according to which host species contributes most to the Chrysococcyx caprius data set. Interspecific relationships: 24 The Diederik Cuckoo is common and host species are known, with Cape widespread throughout the Afrotropics Sparrow Passer melanurus, Masked and occurs in the savanna and forest Weaver Ploceus velatus, Cape Weaver areas from West to East Africa, and P. capensis, Spottedbacked Weaver P. over most of southern Africa (Fry et al. cucullatus, Red Bishop Euplectes orix 1988). There are strongholds in Kwa- and Cape Wagtail Motacilla capensis Zulu-Natal and most of the Transvaal being most frequent (Maclean 1993b). and adjacent hardveld in eastern Bot- Most hosts start breeding well before swana; reporting rates drop sharply Diederik Cuckoos arrive on the breed- further west on Kalahari sands. It is ing grounds and their earlier clutches absent from the Lesotho highlands and are free from nest parasitism. thinly reported from the Transkei. It is The Diederik Cuckoo is ecologi- scarce in the more arid parts of the cally separated from the Emerald Kalahari and the interior of the west- Cuckoo C. cupreus, but overlaps with ern Cape Province; it is absent from Klaas’s Cuckoo C. klaas. Although the Namib Desert. both eat caterpillars, they have differ- It is one of the most conspicuous ent brood hosts and no instances of cuckoos and the atlas data are compre- interspecific competition have been hensive. Its name is onomatopoeic for recorded (Rowan 1983). -
Bird Surveys in the Gamba Complex of Protected Areas, Gabon
Bird Surveys in the Gamba Complex of Protected Areas, Gabon George ANGEHR1, Brian SCHMIDT2, Francis NJIE3, Patrice CHRISTY4, Christina GEBHARD2, Landry TCHIGNOUMBA5 and Martin A.E. OMBENOTORI6 1 Introduction status of protected areas within the complex was revised, and two areas, Loango and Moukalaba- Approximately 2,100 species of birds are known from Doudou, were upgraded to National Parks. An analy- Africa south of the Sahara. Gabon is fairly well known sis by BirdLife International (Christy 2001) found the ornithologically, the first collections having been made Gamba Complex to qualify as one of Gabon’s six by du Chaillu as early as the 1850s. To date, 678 Important Bird Areas (IBAs). Important Bird Areas species have been recorded in the country (Christy are areas that have been determined to be most impor- 2001), or about 30% of the total known for sub- tant for the conservation of birds at the global level, Saharan Africa. Gabon’s bird diversity is relatively lim- based on the distribution of endangered, endemic, ited compared to some other Afrotropical countries, habitat-restricted, and congregatory species. such as Cameroon, which has more than 900 species. Despite its importance, there has been relatively lit- The main factors involved include its relatively small tle published ornithological work on the Gamba size and lack of habitat and topographic diversity. The Complex. Sargeant (1993) was resident at Gamba for natural vegetation of most of Gabon is lowland ever- five years and compiled a bird list for the immediate green and semi-evergreen forest, with only limited area, and as well as lists for other localities within the areas of savanna in the east and south, and its maxi- Complex, including Rabi, the Rembo (River) Ndogo, mum elevation is 1,575 m, compared to 4,095 m for and the east side of the Moukalaba Faunal Reserve, Cameroon. -
The Biodiversity of Atewa Forest
The Biodiversity of Atewa Forest Research Report The Biodiversity of Atewa Forest Research Report January 2019 Authors: Jeremy Lindsell1, Ransford Agyei2, Daryl Bosu2, Jan Decher3, William Hawthorne4, Cicely Marshall5, Caleb Ofori-Boateng6 & Mark-Oliver Rödel7 1 A Rocha International, David Attenborough Building, Pembroke St, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK 2 A Rocha Ghana, P.O. Box KN 3480, Kaneshie, Accra, Ghana 3 Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum A. Koenig (ZFMK), Adenauerallee 160, D-53113 Bonn, Germany 4 Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3RB, UK 5 Department ofPlant Sciences, University ofCambridge,Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK 6 CSIR-Forestry Research Institute of Ghana, Kumasi, Ghana and Herp Conservation Ghana, Ghana 7 Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Invalidenstr. 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany Cover images: Atewa Forest tree with epiphytes by Jeremy Lindsell and Blue-moustached Bee-eater Merops mentalis by David Monticelli. Contents Summary...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Recent history of Atewa Forest................................................................................................................................... 9 Current threats