Entropy E 2859

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Entropy E 2859 Entropy E 2859 45. Tani J, Fukumura N (1997) Self-organizing internal represen- Nonadditive entropy It usually refers to the basis of tation in learning of navigation: A physical experiment by the nonextensive statistical mechanics. This entropy, de- mobile robot Yamabico. Neural Netw 10(1):153–159 noted Sq,isnonadditive for q 1. Indeed, for two 46. Tani J, Nolfi S (1999) Learning to perceive the world as articu- ¤ lated: An approach for hierarchical learning in sensory-motor probabilistically independent subsystems A and B,it satisfies S (A B) S (A) S (B)(q 1). For his- systems. Neural Netw 12:1131–1141 q C ¤ q C q ¤ 47. Tani J, Nishimoto R, Namikawa J, Ito M (2008) Co-developmen- torical reasons, it is frequently (but inadequately) re- tal learning between human and humanoid robot using a dy- ferred to as nonextensive entropy. namic neural network model. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B. q-logarithmic and q-exponential functions Denoted Cybern 38:1 ln x (ln x ln x), and ex (ex ex ), respectively. 48. Varela FJ, Thompson E, Rosch E (1991) The Embodied mind: q 1 D q 1 D Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press, Cam- Extensive system So called for historical reasons. A more bridge appropriate name would be additive system. It is a sys- 49. van Gelder TJ (1998) The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive sci- tem which, in one way or another, relies on or is con- ence. Behav Brain Sci 21:615–628 nected to the (additive) Boltzmann–Gibbs entropy. Its 50. Vaughan E, Di Paolo EA, Harvey I (2004) The evolution of con- trol and adaptation in a 3D powered passive dynamic walker. basic dynamical and/or structural quantities are ex- In:PollackJ,BedauM,HusbandP,IkegamiT,WatsonR(eds) pected to be of the exponential form. In the sense of Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on the Sim- complexity, it may be considered a simple system. ulation and Synthesis of Living Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge Nonextensive system So called for historical reasons. A more appropriate name would be nonadditive sys- tem. It is a system which, in one way or another, relies Entropy on or is connected to a (nonadditive) entropy such as S (q 1). Its basic dynamical and/or structural quan- q ¤ CONSTANTINO TSALLIS1,2 tities are expected to asymptotically be of the power- 1 Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas, law form. In the sense of complexity, it may be consid- Rio de Janeiro, Brazil ered a complex system. 2 Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, USA Definition of the Subject Article Outline Thermodynamics and statistical mechanics are among Glossary the most important formalisms in contemporary physics. Definition of the Subject They have overwhelming and intertwined applications in Introduction science and technology. They essentially rely on two ba- Some Basic Properties sic concepts, namely energy and entropy.Themathemati- Boltzmann–Gibbs Statistical Mechanics cal expression that is used for the first one is well known On the Limitations of Boltzmann–Gibbs Entropy to be nonuniversal; indeed, it depends on whether we are and Statistical Mechanics say in classical, quantum, or relativistic regimes. The sec- The Nonadditive Entropy S q ond concept, and very specifically its connection with the A Connection Between Entropy and Diffusion microscopic world, has been considered during well over Standard and q-Generalized Central Limit Theorems one century as essentially unique and universal as a physi- Future Directions cal concept. Although some mathematical generalizations Acknowledgments of the entropy have been proposed during the last forty Bibliography years, they have frequently been considered as mere prac- tical expressions for disciplines such as cybernetics and Glossary control theory, with no particular physical interpretation. Absolute temperature Denoted T. What we have witnessed during the last two decades is the Clausius entropy Also called thermodynamic entropy. growth, among physicists, of the belief that it is not neces- Denoted S. sarily so. In other words, the physical entropy would ba- Boltzmann–Gibbs entropy Basis of Boltzmann–Gibbs sically rely on the microscopic dynamical and structural statistical mechanics. This entropy, denoted SBG,isad- properties of the system under study. For example, for sys- ditive. Indeed, for two probabilistically independent tems microscopically evolving with strongly chaotic dy- subsystems A and B,itsatisfiesS (A B) S (A) namics, the connection between the thermodynamical en- BG C D BG C SBG(B). tropy and the thermostatistical entropy would be the one 2860 E Entropy found in standard textbooks. But, for more complex sys- later on generalized into tems (e. g., for weakly chaotic dynamics), it becomes ei- ther necessary, or convenient, or both, to extend the tradi- S k f (q; p)ln[f (q; p)] dq dp ; (4) D tional connection. The present article presents the ubiqui- “ tous concept of entropy, useful even for systems for which where (q; p) is called the -space and constitutes the phase no energy can be defined at all, within a standpoint re- space (coordinate q and momentum p) corresponding to flecting a nonuniversal conception for the connection be- one particle. tween the thermodynamic and the thermostatistical en- Boltzmann’s genius insight – the first ever mathemat- tropies. Consequently, both the standard entropy and its ical connection of the macroscopic world with the micro- recent generalizations, as well as the corresponding statis- scopic one – was, during well over three decades, highly tical mechanics, are here presented on equal footing. controversial since it was based on the hypothesis of the existence of atoms. Only a few selected scientists, like Introduction the English chemist and physicist John Dalton, the Scot- The concept of entropy (from the Greek !, en tish physicist and mathematician James Clerk Maxwell, trepo, at turn, at transformation) was first introduced in and the American physicist, chemist and mathematician 1865 by the German physicist and mathematician Rudolf Josiah Willard Gibbs, believed in the reality of atoms and Julius Emanuel Clausius, Rudolf Julius Emanuel in or- molecules. A large part of the scientific establishment was, der to mathematically complete the formalism of classi- at the time, strongly against such an idea. The intricate cal thermodynamics [55], one of the most important the- evolution of Boltzmann’s lifelong epistemological strug- oretical achievements of contemporary physics. The term gle, which ended tragically with his suicide in 1906, may was so coined to make a parallel to energy (from the Greek be considered as a neat illustration of Thomas Kuhn’s o&, energos, at work), the other fundamental con- paradigm shift, and the corresponding reaction of the sci- cept of thermodynamics. Clausius connection was given entific community, as described in The Structure of Sci- by entific Revolutions. There are in fact two important for- malisms in contemporary physics where the mathematical ıQ dS ; (1) theory of probabilities enters as a central ingredient. These D T are statistical mechanics (with the concept of entropy as where ıQ denotes an infinitesimal transfer of heat. In a functional of probability distributions) and quantum other words, 1/T acts as an integrating factor for ıQ. mechanics (with the physical interpretation of wave func- In fact, it was only in 1909 that thermodynamics was tions and measurements). In both cases, contrasting view- finally given, by the Greek mathematician Constantin points and passionate debates have taken place along more Caratheodory, a logically consistent axiomatic formula- than one century, and continue still today. This is no sur- tion. prise after all. If it is undeniable that energy is a very deep In 1872, some years after Clausius proposal, the Aus- and subtle concept, entropy is even more. Indeed, energy trian physicist Ludwig Eduard Boltzmann introduced concerns the world of (microscopic) possibilities,whereas a quantity, that he noted H, which was defined in terms entropy concerns the world of the probabilities of those of microscopic quantities: possibilities, a step further in epistemological difficulty. In his 1902 celebrated book Elementary Principles of H f (v)ln[f (v)] dv ; (2) Statistical Mechanics, Gibbs introduced the modern form • of the entropy for classical systems, namely where f (v)dv is the number of molecules in the veloc- ity space interval dv. Using Newtonian mechanics, Boltz- S k d f (q; p)ln[Cf(q; p)] ; (5) D mann showed that, under some intuitive assumptions Z (Stoßzahlansatz or molecular chaos hypothesis)regarding where represents the full phase space of the system, thus thenatureofmolecularcollisions,H does not increase containing all coordinates and all momenta of its elemen- with time. Five years later, in 1877, he identified this quan- tary particles, and C is introduced to take into account the tity with Clausius entropy through kH S,wherek is finite size and the physical dimensions of the smallest ad- a constant. In other words, he established that missible cell in -space. The constant k is known today to be a universal one, called Boltzmann constant, and given S k f (v)ln[f (v)] dv ; (3) 23 D by k 1:3806505(24) 10 Joule/Kelvin. The studies • D Entropy E 2861 of the German physicist Max Planck along Boltzmann and This violation is one of the mathematical manifesta- Gibbs lines after the appearance of quantum mechanical tions that, at the microscopic level, the state of any concepts, eventually led to the expression physical system exhibits its quantum nature. Expansibility Also S (p ; p ;:::;p ; 0) S (p ; p ; BG 1 2 W D BG 1 2 S k ln W ; (6) :::; D pW ), i. e., zero-probability events do not modify our information about the system. which he coined as Boltzmann entropy. This expression is Maximal value SBG is maximized at equal probabilities, carved on the stone of Boltzmann’s grave at the Central i.
Recommended publications
  • Conceptual Inadequacy of the Shore and Johnson Axioms for Wide Classes of Complex Systems
    Entropy 2015, 17, 2853-2861; doi:10.3390/e17052853 OPEN ACCESS entropy ISSN 1099-4300 www.mdpi.com/journal/entropy Article Conceptual Inadequacy of the Shore and Johnson Axioms for Wide Classes of Complex Systems Constantino Tsallis 1;2 1 Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas and National Institute of Science and Technology for Complex Systems, Rua Xavier Sigaud 150, 22290-180, Rio de Janeiro - RJ, Brazil; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501, NM, USA Academic Editor: Antonio M. Scarfone Received: 9 April 2015 / Accepted: 4 May 2015 / Published: 5 May 2015 Abstract: It is by now well known that the Boltzmann-Gibbs-von Neumann-Shannon logarithmic entropic functional (SBG) is inadequate for wide classes of strongly correlated systems: see for instance the 2001 Brukner and Zeilinger’s Conceptual inadequacy of the Shannon information in quantum measurements, among many other systems exhibiting various forms of complexity. On the other hand, the Shannon and Khinchin axioms uniquely P mandate the BG form SBG = −k i pi ln pi; the Shore and Johnson axioms follow the same path. Many natural, artificial and social systems have been satisfactorily approached P q 1− i pi with nonadditive entropies such as the Sq = k q−1 one (q 2 R; S1 = SBG), basis of nonextensive statistical mechanics. Consistently, the Shannon 1948 and Khinchine 1953 uniqueness theorems have already been generalized in the literature, by Santos 1997 and Abe 2000 respectively, in order to uniquely mandate Sq. We argue here that the same remains to be done with the Shore and Johnson 1980 axioms.
    [Show full text]
  • Nanothermodynamics – a Generic Approach to Material Properties at Nanoscale
    Nanothermodynamics – A generic approach to material properties at nanoscale A. K. Rajagopal (1) , C. S. Pande (1) , and Sumiyoshi Abe (2) (1) Naval Research Laboratory, Washington D.C., 20375, USA (2) Institute of Physics, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8571, Japan ABSTRACT Granular and nanoscale materials containing a relatively small number of constituents have been studied to discover how their properties differ from their macroscopic counterparts. These studies are designed to test how far the known macroscopic approaches such as thermodynamics may be applicable in these cases. A brief review of the recent literature on these topics is given as a motivation to introduce a generic approach called “Nanothermodynamics”. An important feature that must be incorporated into the theory is the non-additive property because of the importance of ‘surface’ contributions to the Physics of these systems. This is achieved by incorporating fluctuations into the theory right from the start. There are currently two approaches to incorporate this property: Hill (and further elaborated more recently with Chamberlin) initiated an approach by modifying the thermodynamic relations by taking into account the surface effects; the other generalizes Boltzmann-Gibbs statistical mechanics by relaxing the additivity properties of thermodynamic quantities to include nonextensive features of such systems. An outline of this generalization of the macroscopic thermodynamics to nano-systems will be given here. Invited presentation at the Indo-US Workshop on “Nanoscale
    [Show full text]
  • [Cond-Mat.Stat-Mech] 3 Sep 2004 H Ee Om Esalte S Tt E H Specific the Get to It Use Then and Shall Tsallis We for Simple Temperature Form
    Generalized Entropies and Statistical Mechanics Fariel Shafee Department of Physics Princeton University Princeton, NJ 08540 USA.∗ We consider the problem of defining free energy and other thermodynamic functions when the entropy is given as a general function of the probability distribution, including that for nonextensive forms. We find that the free energy, which is central to the determination of all other quantities, can be obtained uniquely numerically even when it is the root of a transcendental equation. In particular we study the cases of the Tsallis form and a new form proposed by us recently. We compare the free energy, the internal energy and the specific heat of a simple system of two energy states for each of these forms. PACS numbers: 05.70.-a, 05.90 +m, 89.90.+n Keywords: entropy, nonextensive, probability distribution function, free energy, specific heat I. INTRODUCTION heat in both cases and see how it changes with the change of the parameter at different temperatures. We have recently [1] proposed a new form of nonex- tensive entropy which depends on a parameter similar II. ENTROPY AND PDF to Tsallis entropy [2, 3, 4], and in a similar limit ap- proaches Shannon’s classical extensive entropy. We have shown how the definition for this new form of entropy can The pdf is found by optimizing the function arise naturally in terms of mixing of states in a phase cell when the cell is re-scaled, the parameter being a measure L = S + α(1 − pi)+ β(U − piEi) (1) of the rescaling, and how Shannon’s coding theorem [5] Xi Xi elucidates such an approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Finite Size Analysis of a Two-Dimensional Ising Model Within
    Finite size analysis of a two-dimensional Ising model within a nonextensive approach N. Crokidakis,1, ∗ D.O. Soares-Pinto,2, † M.S. Reis,3 A.M. Souza,4 R.S. Sarthour,2 and I.S. Oliveira2 1Instituto de F´ısica - Universidade Federal Fluminense, Av. Litorˆanea s/n, 24210-340 Niter´oi - RJ, Brazil. 2Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas F´ısicas, Rua Dr. Xavier Sigaud 150, Urca, 22290-180 Rio de Janeiro - RJ, Brazil. 3CICECO, Universidade de Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal. 4Institute for Quantum Computing and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada. (Dated: June 26, 2018) In this work we present a thorough analysis of the phase transitions that occur in a ferromagnetic 2D Ising model, with only nearest-neighbors interactions, in the framework of the Tsallis nonextensive statistics. We performed Monte Carlo simulations on square lattices with linear sizes L ranging from 32 up to 512. The statistical weight of the Metropolis algorithm was changed according to the nonextensive statistics. Discontinuities in the m(T) curve are observed for q ≤ 0.5. However, we have verified only one peak on the energy histograms at the critical temperatures, indicating the occurrence of continuous phase transitions. For the 0.5 < q ≤ 1.0 regime, we have found continuous phase transitions between the ordered and the disordered phases, and determined the critical exponents via finite-size scaling. We verified that the critical exponents α, β and γ depend 2 on the entropic index q in the range 0.5 < q ≤ 1.0 in the form α(q) = (10 q − 33 q + 23)/20, β(q) = (2 q − 1)/8 and γ(q)=(q2 − q + 7)/4.
    [Show full text]
  • A Maximum Entropy Framework for Nonexponential Distributions
    A maximum entropy framework for nonexponential distributions Jack Petersona,b, Purushottam D. Dixitc, and Ken A. Dillb,1 aDepartment of Mathematics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331; bLaufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Departments of Physics and Chemistry, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY 11794; and cDepartment of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032 Contributed by Ken A. Dill, November 7, 2013 (sent for review June 26, 2013) P Probability distributions having power-law tails are observed in functional S½fpkg = − kpklog pk subject to constraints, such as a broad range of social, economic, and biological systems. We the known value of the average energy hEi. This procedure gives −βE describe here a potentially useful common framework. We derive the exponential (Boltzmann) distribution, pk ∝ e k ,whereβ distribution functions {pk} for situations in which a “joiner particle” is the Lagrange multiplier that enforces the constraint. This var- k pays some form of price to enter a community of size k − 1, where iational principle has been the subject of various historical justifi- costs are subject to economies of scale. Maximizing the Boltzmann– cations. It is now commonly understood as the approach that Gibbs–Shannon entropy subject to this energy-like constraint chooses the least-biased model that is consistent with the known predicts a distribution having a power-law tail; it reduces to the constraint(s) (39). Boltzmann distribution in the absence of economies of scale. We Is there an equally compelling principle that would select fat- show that the predicted function gives excellent fits to 13 different tailed distributions, given limited information? There is a large distribution functions, ranging from friendship links in social net- literature that explores this.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Entropy in the Development of Economics
    entropy Article The Role of Entropy in the Development of Economics Aleksander Jakimowicz Department of World Economy, Institute of Economics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Palace of Culture and Science, 1 Defilad Sq., 00-901 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] Received: 25 February 2020; Accepted: 13 April 2020; Published: 16 April 2020 Abstract: The aim of this paper is to examine the role of thermodynamics, and in particular, entropy, for the development of economics within the last 150 years. The use of entropy has not only led to a significant increase in economic knowledge, but also to the emergence of such scientific disciplines as econophysics, complexity economics and quantum economics. Nowadays, an interesting phenomenon can be observed; namely, that rapid progress in economics is being made outside the mainstream. The first significant achievement was the emergence of entropy economics in the early 1970s, which introduced the second law of thermodynamics to considerations regarding production processes. In this way, not only was ecological economics born but also an entropy-based econometric approach developed. This paper shows that non-extensive cross-entropy econometrics is a valuable complement to traditional econometrics as it explains phenomena based on power-law probability distribution and enables econometric model estimation for non-ergodic ill-behaved (troublesome) inverse problems. Furthermore, the entropy economics has accelerated the emergence of modern econophysics and complexity economics. These new directions of research have led to many interesting discoveries that usually contradict the claims of conventional economics. Econophysics has questioned the efficient market hypothesis, while complexity economics has shown that markets and economies function best near the edge of chaos.
    [Show full text]
  • Extensive Statistical Mechanics Based on Nonadditive Entropy: Canonical
    Extensive statistical mechanics based on nonadditive entropy: Canonical ensemble A.S. Parvan Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Russia and Institute of Applied Physics, Moldova Academy of Sciences, MD-2028 Kishineu, Republic of Moldova The original canonical ensemble formalism for the nonextensive entropy thermostatistics is re- considered. It is shown that the unambiguous connection of the statistical mechanics with the equilibrium thermodynamics is provided if the entropic parameter 1/(q − 1) is an extensive variable of the state. Based on a particular example of the perfect gas, it is proved that the Tsallis thermo- statistics meets all the requirements of equilibrium thermodynamics in the thermodynamic limit. In particular, the entropy of the system is extensive and the temperature is intensive. However, for finite systems both the Tsallis and Boltzmann-Gibbs entropies are nonextensive. The equivalence of the canonical and microcanonical ensembles of Tsallis thermostatistics in the thermodynamic limit is established. The issue associated with physical interpretation of the entropic variable is discussed in detail. PACS numbers: 24.60. Ky, 25.70. Pq; 05.70.Jk I. INTRODUCTION The main purpose of this Letter is to establish a clear way to implement the equilibrium statistical mechanics based on the nonadditive entropy deferent from the usual Boltzmann-Gibbs statistical one. For the first time this concept was formulated by Tsallis in [1]. It is very well known that the conventional equilibrium statistical mechanics based on the Boltzmann-Gibbs entropy meets all the requirements of the equilibrium thermodynamics in the thermodynamic limit [2]. This is a necessary condition for self-consistent definition of any equilibrium statistical mechanics.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamical Correlations As Origin of Nonextensive Entropy
    EUROPHYSICS LETTERS 15 May 2005 Europhys. Lett., 70 (4), pp. 439–445 (2005) DOI: 10.1209/epl/i2004-10506-9 Dynamical correlations as origin of nonextensive entropy T. Kodama 1, H.-T. Elze 1,C.E.Aguiar1 and T. Koide 2(∗) 1 Instituto de F´ısica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro C.P. 68528, 21945-970 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil 2 Institut f¨ur Theoretische Physik, University of Frankfurt - Frankfurt, Germany received 10 November 2004; accepted in final form 23 March 2005 published online 13 April 2005 PACS. 05.70.-a – Thermodynamics. PACS. 05.90.+m – Other topics in statistical physics, thermodynamics, and nonlinear dynam- ical systems. Abstract. – We present a simple and general argument showing that a class of dynamical correlations give rise to the so-called Tsallis nonextensive statistics. An example of a system having such a dynamics is given, exhibiting a non-Boltzmann energy distribution. A relation with prethermalization processes is discussed. Generalized statistics and correlations. – In the recent paper by Berges et al. [1], the au- thors show that the dynamics of a quantum scalar field exhibits a prethermalization behavior, where the thermodynamical relations become valid long before the real thermal equilibrium is attained. There, although the system is spatially homogeneous, the single-particle spectra are different from those determined by the usual Boltzmann equilibrium. This means that the validity of thermodynamics does not imply thermal equilibrium in the sense of Boltzmann. Such a situation has also long been claimed by Tsallis [2,3], who introduced the q-entropy, defined in terms of the occupation probabilities {pα} of the microstate α by q 1 − α pa Sq [{pα}]= , (1) q − 1 instead of the usual entropy S[{pα}]=− α pα ln pα.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Notes in Physics
    Lecture Notes in Physics Editorial Board R. Beig, Wien, Austria J. Ehlers, Potsdam, Germany U. Frisch, Nice, France K. Hepp, Zurich,¨ Switzerland W. Hillebrandt, Garching, Germany D. Imboden, Zurich,¨ Switzerland R. L. Jaffe, Cambridge, MA, USA R. Kippenhahn, Gottingen,¨ Germany R. Lipowsky, Golm, Germany H. v. Lohneysen,¨ Karlsruhe, Germany I. Ojima, Kyoto, Japan H. A. Weidenmuller,¨ Heidelberg, Germany J. Wess, Munchen,¨ Germany J. Zittartz, Koln,¨ Germany 3 Berlin Heidelberg New York Barcelona Hong Kong London Milan Paris Singapore Tokyo Editorial Policy The series Lecture Notes in Physics (LNP), founded in 1969, reports new developments in physics research and teaching -- quickly, informally but with a high quality. Manuscripts to be considered for publication are topical volumes consisting of a limited number of contributions, carefully edited and closely related to each other. Each contribution should contain at least partly original and previously unpublished material, be written in a clear, pedagogical style and aimed at a broader readership, especially graduate students and nonspecialist researchers wishing to familiarize themselves with the topic concerned. For this reason, traditional proceedings cannot be considered for this series though volumes to appear in this series are often based on material presented at conferences, workshops and schools (inceptional cases the original papers and/or those not included in the printed book may be added on an accompanying CD ROM, together with the abstracts of posters and other material suitable for publication, e.g. large tables, colour pictures, program codes, etc.). Acceptance Aprojectcanonlybeacceptedtentativelyforpublication,byboththeeditorialboardandthe publisher, following thorough amination of the material submitted. The book proposal sent to the publisher should consist at least of a preliminary table of contents outlining the structureofthebooktogetherwithabstractsofallcontributionstobeincluded.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonextensive Perfect Hydrodynamics – a Model of Dissipative Relativistic Hydrodynamics?
    Cent. Eur. J. Phys. • 7(3) • 2009 • 432-443 DOI: 10.2478/s11534-008-0163-5 Central European Journal of Physics Nonextensive perfect hydrodynamics – a model of dissipative relativistic hydrodynamics? Research Article Takeshi Osada1∗, Grzegorz Wilk2† 1 Theoretical Physics Lab., Faculty of Knowledge Engineering, Musashi Institute of Technology, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 158-8557, Japan 2 The Andrzej Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies, Theoretical Physics Department, ul. Hoża 69, 00-681 Warsaw, Poland Received 14 October 2008; accepted 19 December 2008 Abstract: We demonstrate that nonextensive perfect relativistic hydrodynamics (q-hydrodynamics) can serve as a model of the usual relativistic dissipative hydrodynamics (d-hydrodynamics) therefore facilitating consider- ably its applications. As an illustration, we show how using q-hydrodynamics one gets the q-dependent expressions for the dissipative entropy current and the corresponding ratios of the bulk and shear viscosities to entropy density, ζ/s and η/s respectively. PACS (2008): 05.70.Ln, 12.38.Mh, 12.40.Ee Keywords: nonextensive statistical mechanics • hydrodynamic models • high energy collisions • multiparticle produc- tion processes © Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. 1. Introduction be very effectively described by using a thermodynamic approach in conjunction with hydrodynamical flow. In this so called Landau Hydrodynamic Model, the secondaries were considered to be a product of the decay of some Hydrodynamics is well established as an effective ap- kind of hadronic fluid, produced in such collisions, which proach to flow phenomena. Here we shall present its was expanding before hadronization [1–3]. This model has nonextensive relativistic version from the point of view of recently been updated to describe recent experimental high energy collision physics [1–14].
    [Show full text]
  • Nonextensive Statistical Mechanics and High Energy Physics
    EPJ Web of Conferences 71, 00132 (2014) DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/20147100132 C Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2014 Nonextensive statistical mechanics and high energy physics Constantino Tsallis1,2,a and Zochil Gonzalez Arenas1,b 1Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas, and National Institute of Science and Technology for Complex Systems - Rua Xavier Sigaud 150, 22290-180 Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil 2Santa Fe Institute - 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA Abstract. The use of the celebrated Boltzmann-Gibbs entropy and statistical mechanics is justified for ergodic-like systems. In contrast, complex systems typically require more powerful theories. We will provide a brief introduction to nonadditive entropies (char- acterized by indices like q,which,intheq → 1 limit, recovers the standard Boltzmann- Gibbs entropy) and associated nonextensive statistical mechanics. We then present some recent applications to systems such as high-energy collisions, black holes and others. In addition to that, we clarify and illustrate the neat distinction that exists between Lévy distributions and q-exponential ones, a point which occasionally causes some confusion in the literature, very particularly in the LHC literature. 1 Introduction Boltzmann-Gibbs (BG) statistical mechanics constitutes one of the pillars of contemporary physics, together with Newtonian, quantum and relativistic mechanics, and Maxwell’s electromagnetism. Cen- tral points of any physical theory are when and why it works, and when and why it fails. This is so for any human intellectual construct, hence for the BG theory as well. We intend to briefly discuss here when we must (or must not) use the BG entropy W W 1 S = k p ln p = 1 , (1) BG i p i i=1 i i=1 where k is a constant (either taken equal to Boltzmann constant kB, or to unity).
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:Cond-Mat/0011012 V4 6 Jan 2001
    Nonextensive thermodynamic relations Sumiyoshi Abea, S. Martínezb, c, F. Penninib, c and A. Plastinob, c a College of Science and Technology, Nihon University, Funabashi, Chiba 274-8501, Japan b Instituto de Física de La Plata, National University La Plata, C.C. 727, 1900 La Plata, Argentina c Argentine National Research Council (CONICET) The generalized zeroth law of thermodynamics indicates that the physical temperature in nonextensive statistical mechanics is different from the inverse of the Lagrange multiplier, β . This fact leads to modifications of some of thermodynamic relations for nonextensive systems. Here, taking the first law of thermodynamics and the Legendre transform structure as the basic premises, it is found that Clausius’ definition of the thermodynamic entropy has to be appropriately modified, and accordingly the thermodynamic relations proposed by Tsallis, Mendes and Plastino [Physica A 261 (1998) 534] are also to be rectified. It is shown that the definition of arXiv:cond-mat/0011012 v4 6 Jan 2001 specific heat and the equation of state remain form invariant. As an application, the classical gas model is reexamined and, in marked contrast with the previous result obtained by Abe [Phys. Lett. A 263 (1999) 424: Erratum A 267 (2000) 456] using the unphysical temperature and the unphysical pressure, the specific heat and the equation of state are found to be similar to those in ordinary extensive thermodynamics. PACS: 05.70.-a; 05.20.-y; 05.90.+m 1 1. Introduction It is generally believed that the framework of thermodynamics will remain unchanged forever even if the microscopic dynamical laws may be modified in the future.
    [Show full text]