The Phonology of Contact: Creole Sound Change in Context E-Ching Ng 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Phonology of Contact: Creole Sound Change in Context E-Ching Ng 2015 ABSTRACT The phonology of contact: Creole sound change in context E-Ching Ng 2015 This dissertation identifies three previously unexplained typological differences between creoles, other types of language contact, and ‘normal’ sound change. (1) The merger gap: French /y/ merges with /i/ in all creoles worldwide, whereas merger with /u/ is also well- attested in other forms of language contact. The rarity of /u/ outcomes in French creoles is unexplained, especially because they are well attested in French varieties spoken in West Africa. (2) The assimilation gap: In creoles the quality of the stressed vowel often spreads to unstressed vowels, e.g. Spanish dedo > Papiamentu /dede/ ‘finger’. Strikingly, we do not find the opposite in creoles, but it is well attested among non-creoles, e.g. German umlaut and Romance metaphony. (3) The epenthesis gap: Word-final consonants are often preserved in language contact by means of vowel insertion (epenthesis), e.g. English big > Sranan bigi, but in normal language transmission this sound change is said not to occur word-finally. These three case studies make it possible to test various theories of sound change on new data, by relating language contact outcomes to the phonetics of non-native perception and second language speech production. I also explore the implications of social interactions and historical developments unique to creolisation, with comparisons to other language contact situations. Based on the typological gaps identified here, I propose that sociohistorical context, e.g. age of learner or nature of input, is critical in determining linguistic outcomes. Like phonetic variation, it can be biased in ways which produce asymmetries in sound change. Specifically, in language contact dominated by adult second language acquisition, we find transmission biases towards phonological rather than perceptual matching, overcompen- sation for perceptual weakness, and overgeneralisation of domain-final prominence. The Phonology of Contact: Creole sound change in context A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Yale University in Candidacy for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy by E-Ching Ng Dissertation Director: Stephen R. Anderson May 2015 © 2015 by E-Ching Ng All rights reserved. TABLE OF CONTENTS Tables ............................................................................................................................6 Acknowledgements.......................................................................................................7 Abbreviations................................................................................................................9 1. Introduction........................................................................................................... 10 1.1. The transmission bias hypothesis ..........................................................................10 1.2. Analysis of sound change........................................................................................ 13 1.2.1. Mechanisms of sound change...................................................................... 13 1.2.2. The actuation problem ................................................................................. 14 1.2.3. Formalisations ............................................................................................... 15 1.3. Types of transmission.............................................................................................. 18 1.3.1. Unbroken L1 transmission........................................................................... 18 1.3.2. Creolisation.................................................................................................... 21 1.3.3. Second language acquisition (L2 acquisition) ...........................................24 1.3.4. Loanword adaptation....................................................................................26 1.4. Literature review ......................................................................................................28 1.4.1. Thomason and Kaufman’s framework.......................................................28 1.4.2. Bickerton’s language bioprogram hypothesis............................................32 1.4.3. McWhorter’s creole prototype hypothesis.................................................34 1.4.4. Esoteric vs. exoteric communication..........................................................37 1.4.5. Summary: Literature review.........................................................................43 1.5. Conclusion............................................................................................................... 44 2. The Merger Gap in Creoles vs. Other Contact...................................................... 45 2.1. Introduction..............................................................................................................45 2.2. Database ....................................................................................................................47 2.2.1. French creoles................................................................................................47 2.2.2. French in other language contact situations..............................................50 2.3. Previous proposals................................................................................................... 53 2.4. Analysis .....................................................................................................................56 2.5. Extending the proposal .......................................................................................... 60 2.5.1. The phonological bias hypothesis .............................................................. 60 2.5.2. Predictions for other transmission types ...................................................61 2.6. Conclusion................................................................................................................65 3. The Assimilation Gap in Creoles vs. L1 Transmission .........................................66 3.1. Introduction............................................................................................................. 66 3.2. Data............................................................................................................................68 3.2.1. Vowel assimilation in non-creoles..............................................................68 3.2.2. Vowel assimilation in creolisation ..............................................................70 3.3. Previous proposals ...................................................................................................78 3.3.1. Coarticulation................................................................................................79 3.3.2. Listener-oriented cue enhancement ...........................................................84 3.3.3. Chain-shift-like vowel movement...............................................................85 3.3.4. Perceptual compensation............................................................................. 91 3.3.5. Substrate transfer?.........................................................................................95 3.4. Analysis .................................................................................................................... 99 3.4.1. Stress, substrates and lexifiers....................................................................100 3.4.2. L2 perceptual compensation......................................................................102 3.4.3. Weak-trigger assimilation is blocked in creolisation..............................104 3.5. Extending the analysis........................................................................................... 105 3.5.1. The contact compensation hypotheses..................................................... 105 3.5.2. Predictions for creole dissimilation ..........................................................106 3.5.3. Predictions for ‘uproot tall poppies’ effects in creoles............................108 3.5.4. Predictions for other contact situations ...................................................109 3.5.5. The contact overcompensation hypothesis............................................... 111 3.6. Conclusion...............................................................................................................113 4. The Epenthesis Gap in L1 Transmission vs. Contact........................................... 115 4.1. Introduction.............................................................................................................115 4.2. Database ...................................................................................................................117 4.2.1. Paragoge attributed to language contact...................................................117 4.2.2. Paragoge attributed to L1 sound change................................................... 122 4.3. Generalisations....................................................................................................... 124 4.4. Previous proposals..................................................................................................131 4.4.1. Previous accounts on the epenthesis gap ..................................................131 4.4.2. Other proposals for specific transmission types.......................................132 4.5. Analysis ....................................................................................................................135
Recommended publications
  • Repercussions of the History of a Typological Change in Germanic
    Repercussions of the history of a typological change in Germanic. Roland Noske Université Lille 3 / CNRS UMR 8163 [email protected] Abstract. In acoustic experimental phonetic investigations, the distinction made by Pike (1945) and Abercrombie (1967) between syllable-timed and stress timed has been refuted on several occasions. (e.g. by Wenk and Wioland 1982). However, perceptual research (Dauer 1983, 1987) has given rise to re-instalment of this typology by Auer (1993, 2001). Auer proposes a gradual, multi-factorial typology between syllable counting languages (also called simply syllable languages) and stress counting languages (or word languages). In this typology, several indicators are used for positioning a language on the continuous scale between the syllable language prototype and the word language prototype. These indicators include, among others, complexity of syllable structure, the occurrence of geminate clusters, tonality, tonal phenomena, the occurrence of vowel harmony or metaphony, epenthesis, vowel deletion, liaison, the occurrence of internal and external sandhi, as well as morphological reanalyses. In this paper, this typology will be used to show that in the course of time, most West- Germanic dialects have moved gradually from the syllable type to the word type. Evidence for this comes from research done on Old High German and Midlle High German texts, as well as from German dialectology. It will be shown that the contrast between Northern an Southern Dutch with respect to liaison across word boundaries and the vowel deletion promoting regular syllable structure (both indicators for syllable language-hood), is not the result of a French influence (as assumed by Noske (2005, 2006, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • The Phonetics-Phonology Interface in Romance Languages José Ignacio Hualde, Ioana Chitoran
    Surface sound and underlying structure : The phonetics-phonology interface in Romance languages José Ignacio Hualde, Ioana Chitoran To cite this version: José Ignacio Hualde, Ioana Chitoran. Surface sound and underlying structure : The phonetics- phonology interface in Romance languages. S. Fischer and C. Gabriel. Manual of grammatical interfaces in Romance, 10, Mouton de Gruyter, pp.23-40, 2016, Manuals of Romance Linguistics, 978-3-11-031186-0. hal-01226122 HAL Id: hal-01226122 https://hal-univ-paris.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01226122 Submitted on 24 Dec 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Manual of Grammatical Interfaces in Romance MRL 10 Brought to you by | Université de Paris Mathematiques-Recherche Authenticated | [email protected] Download Date | 11/1/16 3:56 PM Manuals of Romance Linguistics Manuels de linguistique romane Manuali di linguistica romanza Manuales de lingüística románica Edited by Günter Holtus and Fernando Sánchez Miret Volume 10 Brought to you by | Université de Paris Mathematiques-Recherche Authenticated | [email protected] Download Date | 11/1/16 3:56 PM Manual of Grammatical Interfaces in Romance Edited by Susann Fischer and Christoph Gabriel Brought to you by | Université de Paris Mathematiques-Recherche Authenticated | [email protected] Download Date | 11/1/16 3:56 PM ISBN 978-3-11-031178-5 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-031186-0 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-039483-2 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of the Least Documented Language Families in the World
    Vol. 4 (2010), pp. 177-212 http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/ldc/ http://hdl.handle.net/10125/4478 The status of the least documented language families in the world Harald Hammarström Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen and Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig This paper aims to list all known language families that are not yet extinct and all of whose member languages are very poorly documented, i.e., less than a sketch grammar’s worth of data has been collected. It explains what constitutes a valid family, what amount and kinds of documentary data are sufficient, when a language is considered extinct, and more. It is hoped that the survey will be useful in setting priorities for documenta- tion fieldwork, in particular for those documentation efforts whose underlying goal is to understand linguistic diversity. 1. InTroducTIon. There are several legitimate reasons for pursuing language documen- tation (cf. Krauss 2007 for a fuller discussion).1 Perhaps the most important reason is for the benefit of the speaker community itself (see Voort 2007 for some clear examples). Another reason is that it contributes to linguistic theory: if we understand the limits and distribution of diversity of the world’s languages, we can formulate and provide evidence for statements about the nature of language (Brenzinger 2007; Hyman 2003; Evans 2009; Harrison 2007). From the latter perspective, it is especially interesting to document lan- guages that are the most divergent from ones that are well-documented—in other words, those that belong to unrelated families. I have conducted a survey of the documentation of the language families of the world, and in this paper, I will list the least-documented ones.
    [Show full text]
  • Assimilation, Reduction and Elision Reflected in the Selected Song Lyrics of Avenged Sevenfold
    Dwi Nita Febriyanti Assimilation, Reduction and Elision Reflected in the Selected Song Lyrics of Avenged Sevenfold Dwi Nita Febriyanti [email protected] English Language Studies, Sanata Dharma University Abstract This paper discusses the phenomena of phonological rules, especially assimilation, reduction and elision processes. In this paper, the writer conducted phonological study which attempts to find the phenomena of those processes in song lyrics. In taking the data, the writer transcribed the lyrics of the songs, along with checking them to the internet source, then observed the lyrics to find the phenomena of assimilation, reduction, and elision. After that, she classified the observed phenomena in the lyrics based on the phonological processes. From the data analysis, the results showed that there were three processes found both in the first and second songs: assimilation, reduction and elision. The difference is that in the first song, it has four kinds of assimilation, while from the second song only has three kinds of assimilation. Keywords: assimilation, reduction, elision Introduction brothers and sisters’ discussion or even in songs, for which songs are considered as the As English spoken by the native media for the composer to share his feelings. speakers, it sometimes undergoes simplification to ease the native speakers in Assimilation usually happens in the expressing their feelings. That is why, it is double consonants. This is a phenomenon common for them to speak English in high which shows the influence of one sound to speed along with their emotions. As the another to become more similar. While for result, they make a ‘shortcut’ to get ease of the reduction process, it can happen to the their pronunciation.
    [Show full text]
  • L Vocalisation As a Natural Phenomenon
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Essex Research Repository L Vocalisation as a Natural Phenomenon Wyn Johnson and David Britain Essex University [email protected] [email protected] 1. Introduction The sound /l/ is generally characterised in the literature as a coronal lateral approximant. This standard description holds that the sounds involves contact between the tip of the tongue and the alveolar ridge, but instead of the air being blocked at the sides of the tongue, it is also allowed to pass down the sides. In many (but not all) dialects of English /l/ has two allophones – clear /l/ ([l]), roughly as described, and dark, or velarised, /l/ ([…]) involving a secondary articulation – the retraction of the back of the tongue towards the velum. In dialects which exhibit this allophony, the clear /l/ occurs in syllable onsets and the dark /l/ in syllable rhymes (leaf [li˘f] vs. feel [fi˘…] and table [te˘b…]). The focus of this paper is the phenomenon of l-vocalisation, that is to say the vocalisation of dark /l/ in syllable rhymes 1. feel [fi˘w] table [te˘bu] but leaf [li˘f] 1 This process is widespread in the varieties of English spoken in the South-Eastern part of Britain (Bower 1973; Hardcastle & Barry 1989; Hudson and Holloway 1977; Meuter 2002, Przedlacka 2001; Spero 1996; Tollfree 1999, Trudgill 1986; Wells 1982) (indeed, it appears to be categorical in some varieties there) and which extends to many other dialects including American English (Ash 1982; Hubbell 1950; Pederson 2001); Australian English (Borowsky 2001, Borowsky and Horvath 1997, Horvath and Horvath 1997, 2001, 2002), New Zealand English (Bauer 1986, 1994; Horvath and Horvath 2001, 2002) and Falkland Island English (Sudbury 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • The American Intrusive L
    THE AMERICAN INTRUSIVE L BRYAN GICK University of British Columbia The well-known sandhi phenomenon known as intrusive r has been one of the longest-standing problems in English phonology. Recent work has brought to light a uniquely American contribution to this discussion: the intrusive l (as in draw[l]ing for drawing and bra[l] is for bra is in southern Pennsylvania, compared to draw[r]ing and bra[r] is, respectively, in British Received Pronunciation [RP]). In both instances of intrusion, a historically unattested liquid consonant (r or l) intervenes in the hiatus between a morpheme-final nonhigh vowel and a following vowel, either across or within words. Not surprisingly, this process interacts crucially with the well- known cases of /r/-vocalization (e.g., Kurath and McDavid 1961; Labov 1966; Labov, Yaeger, and Steiner 1972; Fowler 1986) and /l/-vocalization (e.g., Ash 1982a, 1982b), which have been identified as important markers of sociolinguistic stratification in New York City, Philadelphia, and else- where. However, previous discussion of the intrusive l (Gick 1999) has focused primarily on its phonological implications, with almost no attempt to describe its geographic, dialectal, and sociolinguistic context. This study marks such an attempt. In particular, it argues that the intrusive l is an instance of phonological change in progress. Descriptively, the intrusive l parallels the intrusive r in many respects. Intrusive r may be viewed simplistically as the extension by analogy of a historically attested final /r/ to words historically ending in a vowel (gener- ally this applies only to the set of non-glide-final vowels: /@, a, O/).
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin and Development of the Lingua Franca”
    Manuel Sedlaczek “The Origin and Development of the Lingua Franca” A historical linguistic study DIPLOMARBEIT zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Magister der Philosophie Studium: Anglistik und Amerikanistik Universität Klagenfurt Fakultät für Kulturwissenschaften Begutachter/in: O. Univ.-Prof. Mag. Dr. Allan Richard James Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik November 2010 i Declaration of honour For Master’s Theses, Diploma Theses and Dissertations I hereby confirm on my honour that I personally prepared the present academic work and carried out myself the activities directly involved with it. I also confirm that I have used no resources other than those declared. All formulations and concepts adopted literally or in their essential content from printed, unprinted or Internet sources have been cited according to the rules for academic work and identified by means of footnotes or other precise indications of source. The support provided during the work, including significant assistance from my supervisor has been indicated in full. The academic work has not been submitted to any other examination authority. The work is submitted in printed and electronic form. I confirm that the content of the digital version is completely identical to that of the printed version. I am aware that a false declaration will have legal consequences. (Signature) (Place, date) ii TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ....................................................................... 1 1.1 THE STUDY OF THE LINGUA FRANCA ............................................................. 1 1.2 HISTORICAL LINGUISTICS AND ANTHROPOLOGY ........................................... 4 1.3 THE CREATING OF HISTORY ............................................................................ 5 1.4 THE RE -INTEGRATION OF HISTORY ................................................................. 8 1.5 THE IMPORTANCE OF HISTORY ..................................................................... 10 CHAPTER 2: PROBLEMS CONCERNING THE LINGUA FRANCA .....
    [Show full text]
  • 02 Whole.Pdf (6.688Mb)
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. A study of the apostrophe in New Zealand today: its use, attitudes towards its use and its place in a historical continuum. A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. Hilary Louise Laracy 2018 i Copyright is owned by the author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be produced elsewhere without the permission of the author. Title image: Cootes, 1658, p. 27. Image courtesy of The Newbury Library, Chicago, Call number case I 6111.19. Image published with permission of ProQuest. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. ii Abstract This is the first study to tell the whole story of the apostrophe in one comprehensive work. In a two-part study, the investigation first traces the history of the apostrophe from its origins to the prescriptive rules that govern its use today, before exploring the factors that influence modern attitudes and practices, as well as implications for the future. Part I involves an examination of the relevant literature and original manuscripts and texts to trace the history of the apostrophe from a 2,000 year old Greek papyrus, through French and into English in the sixteenth century, showing that it did not come via Latin as dictionary etymologies suggest.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2. Native Languages of West-Central California
    Chapter 2. Native Languages of West-Central California This chapter discusses the native language spoken at Spanish contact by people who eventually moved to missions within Costanoan language family territories. No area in North America was more crowded with distinct languages and language families than central California at the time of Spanish contact. In the chapter we will examine the information that leads scholars to conclude the following key points: The local tribes of the San Francisco Peninsula spoke San Francisco Bay Costanoan, the native language of the central and southern San Francisco Bay Area and adjacent coastal and mountain areas. San Francisco Bay Costanoan is one of six languages of the Costanoan language family, along with Karkin, Awaswas, Mutsun, Rumsen, and Chalon. The Costanoan language family is itself a branch of the Utian language family, of which Miwokan is the only other branch. The Miwokan languages are Coast Miwok, Lake Miwok, Bay Miwok, Plains Miwok, Northern Sierra Miwok, Central Sierra Miwok, and Southern Sierra Miwok. Other languages spoken by native people who moved to Franciscan missions within Costanoan language family territories were Patwin (a Wintuan Family language), Delta and Northern Valley Yokuts (Yokutsan family languages), Esselen (a language isolate) and Wappo (a Yukian family language). Below, we will first present a history of the study of the native languages within our maximal study area, with emphasis on the Costanoan languages. In succeeding sections, we will talk about the degree to which Costanoan language variation is clinal or abrupt, the amount of difference among dialects necessary to call them different languages, and the relationship of the Costanoan languages to the Miwokan languages within the Utian Family.
    [Show full text]
  • Judeo-Provençal in Southern France
    George Jochnowitz Judeo-Provençal in Southern France 1 Brief introduction Judeo-Provençal is also known as Judeo-Occitan, Judéo-Comtadin, Hébraïco- Comtadin, Hébraïco-Provençal, Shuadit, Chouadit, Chouadite, Chuadit, and Chuadite. It is the Jewish analog of Provençal and is therefore a Romance lan- guage. The age of the language is a matter of dispute, as is the case with other Judeo-Romance languages. It was spoken in only four towns in southern France: Avignon, Cavaillon, Caprentras, and l’Isle-sur-Sorgue. A women’s prayer book, some poems, and a play are the sources of the medieval language, and transcrip- tions of Passover songs and theatrical representations are the sources for the modern language. In addition, my own interviews in 1968 with the language’s last known speaker, Armand Lunel, provide data (Jochnowitz 1978, 1985). Lunel, who learned the language from his grandparents, not his parents, did not have occasion to converse in it. Judeo-Provençal/Shuadit is now extinct, since Armand Lunel died in 1977. Sometimes Jewish languages have a name meaning “Jewish,” such as Yiddish or Judezmo – from Hebrew Yehudit or other forms of Yehuda. This is the case with Shuadit, due to a sound change of /y/ to [š]. I use the name Judeo-Provençal for the medieval language and Shuadit for the modern language. 2 Historical background 2.1 Speaker community: Settlement, documentation Jews had lived in Provence at least as early as the first century CE. They were officially expelled from France in 1306, readmitted in 1315, expelled again in 1322, readmitted in 1359, and expelled in 1394 for a period that lasted until the French Revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • French : the Most Practical Foreign Language
    French : The Most Practical Foreign Language While any language will be useful for some jobs or for some regions, French is the only foreign language that can be useful throughout the world as well as in the United States. French as a foreign language is the second most frequently taught language in the world after English. The International Organization of Francophonie has 51 member states and governments. Of these, 28 countries have French as an official language. French is the only language other than English spoken on five continents. French and English are the only two global languages. When deciding on a foreign language for work or school, consider that French is the language that will give you the most choices later on in your studies or your career. French, along with English, is the official working language of ● the United Nations ● UNESCO ● NATO ● Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) ● the International Labor Bureau ● the International Olympic Committee ● the 31-member Council of Europe ● the European Community ● the Universal Postal Union ● the International Red Cross ● Union of International Associations (UIA) French is the dominant working language at ● the European Court of Justice ● the European Tribunal of First Instance ● the European Court of Auditors in Luxembourg. ● the Press Room at the European Commission in Brussels, Belgium One example of the importance of French can be seen in a recent listing of international jobs (8/29/06) distributed by the US State Department: 135 required or preferred French, 49 Spanish, 25 a UN language (Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian, and Spanish), 6 Arabic, 6 Russian, 2 German, 2 Italian , and Chinese 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Fre 231 Course Title: Introduction to French
    FRE 231 INTRODUCTION TO FRENCH PHONOLOGY NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA SCHOOL OF ART AND SOCIAL SCIENCE COURSE CODE: FRE 231 COURSE TITLE: INTRODUCTION TO FRENCH PHONOLOGY 60 FRE 231 INTRODUCTION TO FRENCH PHONOLOGY COURSE GUIDE FRE 231 INTRODUCTION TO FRENCH PHONOLOGY Course Team Dr. Paulin Dipe Alo (Course Developer/Writer) – University of Lagos Dr. Christine Ofulue (Programme Leader) – NOUN Ms. Lucy Jibrin (Course Coordinator) – NOUN NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA 61 FRE 231 INTRODUCTION TO FRENCH PHONOLOGY National Open University of Nigeria Headquarters 14/16 Ahmadu Bello Way Victoria Island, Lagos Abuja Office 5 Dar es Salaam Street Off Aminu Kano Crescent Wuse II, Abuja e-mail: [email protected] URL: www.noun.edu.ng Published by National Open University of Nigeria Printed 2013 Reprinted 2014 ISBN: 978-058-342-4 All Rights Reserved 62 FRE 231 INTRODUCTION TO FRENCH PHONOLOGY CONTENTS PAGE Introduction ……………………………………………… iv What you will Learn in this Course …………………….. iv Course Aims …………………………………………….. iv Course Objectives ………………………………………. iv Working through this Course …………………………… v Course Materials ………………………………………… v Study Units ………………………………………………. v Set Textbooks ……………………………………………. vi Assignment File …………………………………………. vii Assessment ……………………………………………… vii Tutor-Marked Assignments (TMAs) …………………… vii Final Examinations and Grading ……………………….. viii Course Marking Scheme ……………………………….. viii Course Overview ……………………………………….. viii How to Get the Most from this Course ………………… viii Summary ………………………………………………… ix 63 FRE 231 INTRODUCTION TO FRENCH PHONOLOGY INTRODUCTION This is a one-semester course in the third year of B.A. (Hons.) in French studies. It is a two-credit unit course which introduces you to the essentials of phonology in French. This course is important and necessary for you because it enables you to better understand the functioning of the French language sound system, so as for them to put into practice the phonological rules they acquire in the course of this programme.
    [Show full text]