PRACTICES in TEXTS and CONTEXTS by Kelly A. Whitcomb

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PRACTICES in TEXTS and CONTEXTS by Kelly A. Whitcomb RELIGIOUS AND COMMUNAL PRACTICES IN THREE TRADITIONS OF ESTHER: PRACTICES IN TEXTS AND CONTEXTS By Kelly A. Whitcomb Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Religion May 2013 Nashville, TN Approved: Douglas A. Knight Annalisa Azzoni Ted A. Smith Kathy L. Gaca Herbert Marbury Jack M. Sasson Copyright © Kelly A. Whitcomb All Rights Reserved To my late grandparents, Beverly D. Stewart, George T. Stewart, Edith L. Whitcomb and Wilson F. Whitcomb, who were unable to see me obtain my Ph.D. but who taught me life's most important lessons— Love one another and let kids be kids. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................... vi LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS.......................................................................................... viii Chapter I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................1 Introduction..............................................................................................................1 Judeans and Jews .....................................................................................................3 Narrative Contexts and Socio-historical Contexts.................................................11 Methods and Approaches in This Study ................................................................13 Historical Criticism: Redaction and Textual Criticism of Esther .......................19 Literary Criticism................................................................................................33 Issues of Genre.................................................................................................35 The Masoretic Text.......................................................................................35 The Greek versions .......................................................................................38 Genre in MT, LXX and AT ..........................................................................38 Social Theory......................................................................................................43 Gender..............................................................................................................51 Ideology ...........................................................................................................53 Practice.............................................................................................................61 Outline of the Study...............................................................................................65 Conclusion .............................................................................................................67 II. TO FAST OR NOT TO FAST: THREE PERSPECTIVES ON FASTING IN ESTHER ...................................................69 Introduction............................................................................................................69 Fasting and Feasting ..............................................................................................70 Fasting in Antiquity ............................................................................................70 Conclusions......................................................................................................78 Feasting in Esther................................................................................................82 Fasting in Esther .................................................................................................88 Esther 4:3 (AT 4:1) ..........................................................................................90 Redaction and textual criticism.....................................................................90 Literary and ideological matters ...................................................................94 Esther 4:16 (AT 4:11) ......................................................................................95 Redaction and textual criticism.....................................................................95 iv Literary and ideological matters ...................................................................99 Esther 9:31 (LXX 9:30) .................................................................................104 Source, redaction and textual criticism.......................................................104 Literary and ideological matters .................................................................110 Fasting and Gender ........................................................................................111 Dietary Matters in Esther.....................................................................................114 Conclusions..........................................................................................................120 III. BESEECHING GOD AND KING: THE ROLES OF PRAYER IN THE JUDEAN DIASPORA..........................................124 Introduction..........................................................................................................124 Bourdieu and Prayer as Capital............................................................................125 MT and Prayer .....................................................................................................126 The Greek Versions and Prayer ...........................................................................133 Biblical Scholarship on Addition C ..................................................................140 LXX and AT and Prayer...................................................................................144 Prayer and Gender................................................................................................157 Conclusions..........................................................................................................160 IV. CAPITAL AND CIRCUMCISION: DEFINING JUDEANS AND JEWS IN THE MIDST OF EMPIRE..............................167 Introduction..........................................................................................................167 Circumcision in Antiquity....................................................................................168 Observations about MT Esther ............................................................................171 Observations about LXX Esther ..........................................................................186 Observations about AT Esther.............................................................................193 Circumcision and Gender ....................................................................................204 Conclusions..........................................................................................................206 V. CONCLUSION...........................................................................................................212 Historical and Ideological Matters in Review .....................................................213 Fasting, Prayer and Circumcision Revisited.....................................................217 Implications for Biblical Interpretation and Application.....................................223 Possibilities for Further Study ..........................................................................229 Conclusion ...........................................................................................................231 Afterword.............................................................................................................231 Appendix A. SOME SCRIPTURAL REFERENCES TO FASTING IN THE HEBREW BIBLE AND APOCRYPHA/PSEUDEPIGRAPHA ...................................................................236 BIBLIOGRAPHY............................................................................................................237 v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank my dissertation committee for their input and support. Professor Douglas A. Knight has offered encouragement and advice every step of the way concerning the struggles of writing a dissertation. Professor Annalisa Azzoni's engagement of questions of gender and identity in antiquity have shaped my approach to the texts in question. Professor Ted A. Smith's knowledge of social theory and passion for biblical texts have helped me to nuance how I understand biblical texts in antiquity with the aid of theory. Professor Kathy L. Gaca's engagement of social issues such as justice with regard to ancient texts has also formed my understanding of the types of questions I bring to the biblical texts. I would also like to thank Professor Jack M. Sasson for his detailed response and his insight from a Jewish perspective, a necessity when a Christian attempts to make claims about Judaism in any era. Finally, Professor Herbert Marbury also provided helpful feedback from the perspective of a biblical scholar attempting to engage the ancient texts with social theory. I would also like to thank my master's degree professors whose encouragement and support assisted me in preparing for doctoral studies and whose own scholarship and teaching have formed me in ways that have influenced this project as well. Professors Greg Carey and Julia O'Brien at Lancaster Theological Seminary, as well as Professor John Endres from the Jesuit School of Theology and Professor Kah-Jin Jeffrey Kuan of Drew University have all provided invaluable support
Recommended publications
  • Learning to Trust God's Unseen Hand
    Learning to Trust God’s Unseen Hand A Study of Esther Esther 9:1­19 Lesson #11: In times of defense, remember mercy. Introduction: Consider the interesting wording of the last stanza of the Star­Spangled Banner: ​ Oh! thus be it ever, when freemen shall stand Between their loved home and the war’s desolation! Blest with victory and peace, may the heav’n rescued land Praise the Power that hath made and preserved us a nation. Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just, And this be our motto: “In God is our trust.” And the star­spangled banner in triumph shall wave O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave! A question that is raised here is this: by what do we gain or lose by invoking the name of God when it comes the fighting of a battle? Is it appropriate to invoke the name of God when going to war? While the answers to these questions are not easy, they are nonetheless worthy of inquiry. Too easily have we just associated God’s covenant relationship with the Jews as having the same legitimacy for America. In addressing this issue, we find that while God’s relationship with Israel is unique, there are moral focal points that we can be applied to any culture at any time, including how we are to defend ourselves from those who will attack us because of our faith. Verses 1­10 ­ The author builds a chiastic structure into his presentation of the events pictured in 9:1–19.
    [Show full text]
  • “Seeing God at Work” Esther 8:3–9:3, 26-28
    watch the sermons | plymouthchurch.org “Seeing God at Work” Esther 8:3–9:3, 26-28 Brett Younger Senior Minister July 11, 2021 The Eighth Sunday of Pentecost Then Esther spoke again to the king; she fell at his feet, weeping and pleading with him to avert the evil design of Haman the Agagite and the plot that he had devised against the Jews. The king held out the golden scepter to Esther, and Esther rose and stood before the king. She said, “If it pleases the king, and if I have won his favor, and if the thing seems right before the king, and I have his approval, let an order be written to revoke the letters devised by Haman son of Hammedatha the Agagite, which he wrote giving orders to destroy the Jews who are in all the provinces of the king. For how can I bear to see the calamity that is coming on my people? Or how can I bear to see the destruction of my kindred?” Then King Ahasuerus said to Queen Esther and to the Jew Mordecai, “See, I have given Esther the house of Haman, and they have hanged him on the gallows, because he plotted to lay hands on the Jews. You may write as you please with regard to the Jews, in the name of the king, and seal it with the king’s ring; for an edict written in the name of the king and sealed with the king’s ring cannot be revoked.” The king’s secretaries were summoned at that time, in the third month, which is the month of Sivan, on the twenty-third day; and an edict was written, according to all that Mordecai commanded, to the Jews and to the satraps and the governors and the officials of the provinces from India to Ethiopia, one hundred twenty-seven provinces, to every province in its own script and to every people in its own language, and also to the Jews in their script and their language.
    [Show full text]
  • The Authority of Scripture: the Puzzle of the Genealogies of Jesus Mako A
    The Authority of Scripture: The Puzzle of the Genealogies of Jesus Mako A. Nagasawa, June 2005 Four Main Differences in the Genealogies Provided by Matthew and Luke 1. Is Jesus descended through the line of Solomon (Mt) or the line of Nathan (Lk)? Or both? 2. Are there 27 people from David to Jesus (Mt) or 42 (Lk)? 3. Who was Joseph’s father? Jacob (Mt) or Heli (Lk)? 4. What is the lineage of Shealtiel and Zerubbabel? a. Are they the same father-son pair in Mt as in Lk? (Apparently popular father-son names were repeated across families – as with Jacob and Joseph in Matthew’s genealogy) If not, then no problem. I will, for purposes of this discussion, assume that they are not the same father-son pair. b. If so, then there is another problem: i. Who was Shealtiel’s father? Jeconiah (Mt) or Neri (Lk)? ii. Who was Zerubbabel’s son? Abihud (Mt) or Rhesa (Lk)? And where are these two in the list of 1 Chronicles 3:19-20 ( 19b the sons of Zerubbabel were Meshullam and Hananiah, and Shelomith was their sister; 20 and Hashubah, Ohel, Berechiah, Hasadiah and Jushab-hesed, five)? Cultural Factors 1. Simple remarriage. It is likely that in most marriages, men were older and women were younger (e.g. Joseph and Mary). So it is also likely that when husbands died, many women remarried. This was true in ancient times: Boaz married the widow Ruth, David married the widow Bathsheba after Uriah was killed. It also seems likely to have been true in classical, 1 st century times: Paul (in Rom.7:1-3) suggests that this is at least somewhat common in the Jewish community (‘I speak to those under the Law’ he says) in the 1 st century.
    [Show full text]
  • Chart of the Kings of Israel and Judah
    The Kings of Israel & Judah Why Study the Kings? Chart of the Kings Questions for Discussion The Heritage of Jesus Host: Alan's Gleanings Alphabetical List of the Kings A Comment about Names God's Message of Salvation Kings of the United Kingdom (c 1025-925 BC) Relationship to God's King Previous King Judgment Saul none did evil Ishbosheth* son (unknown) David none did right Solomon did right in youth, son (AKA Jedidiah) evil in old age * The kingdom was divided during Ishbosheth's reign; David was king over the tribe of Judah. Kings of Judah (c 925-586 BC) Kings of Israel (c 925-721 BC) Relationship to God's Relationship to God's King King Previous King Judgment Previous King Judgment Rehoboam son did evil Abijam Jeroboam servant did evil son did evil (AKA Abijah) Nadab son did evil Baasha none did evil Asa son did right Elah son did evil Zimri captain did evil Omri captain did evil Ahab son did evil Jehoshaphat son did right Ahaziah son did evil Jehoram son did evil (AKA Joram) Jehoram son of Ahab did evil Ahaziah (AKA Joram) (AKA Azariah son did evil or Jehoahaz) Athaliah mother did evil Jehu captain mixed Joash did right in youth, son of Ahaziah Jehoahaz son did evil (AKA Jehoash) evil in old age Joash did right in youth, son did evil Amaziah son (AKA Jehoash) evil in old age Jeroboam II son did evil Zachariah son did evil did evil Uzziah Shallum none son did right (surmised) (AKA Azariah) Menahem none did evil Pekahiah son did evil Jotham son did right Pekah captain did evil Ahaz son did evil Hoshea none did evil Hezekiah son did right Manasseh son did evil Amon son did evil Josiah son did right Jehoahaz son did evil (AKA Shallum) Jehoiakim Assyrian captivity son of Josiah did evil (AKA Eliakim) Jehoiachin (AKA Coniah son did evil or Jeconiah) Zedekiah son of Josiah did evil (AKA Mattaniah) Babylonian captivity Color Code Legend: King did right King did evil Other.
    [Show full text]
  • 17 -18 Bible Study #3 9 26 17 Introduction to 2017 – 2018 Bible Study (OT Prophets) 9/26/17 Prayer Requests
    17 -18 Bible Study #3 9 26 17 Introduction to 2017 – 2018 Bible Study (OT Prophets) 9/26/17 Prayer Requests • Poor Clare – 703 768 4918 Alexandria, VA - leave a message on recorder • Dominican Sisters -540 635 3982 Linden, VA - speak to a sister • Donations are welcome First Week • Overview and definition of the prophets • 12 periods of Bible History • Development and overview of the Bible and 14 historical books • Timeline of united and divided kingdoms Last Week • 20 Evil Kings of Israel • 7 Non-Canonical Prophets of Israel: • Ahijah – to Jeroboam promising 10 tribes; sons will die • Man of God – to Jeroboam destruction of temple at Bethel • Lying prophet – tricked man of God causing his death • Jehu - to Baasha – house will be destroyed • Micaiah – to Ahab – death of King of Judah in battle • Elijah – to Ahab • Elisha – to Joram Last Week (Cont) • 3 Canonical prophet of Israel • Jonah -prophesied to Assyria and Jeroboam II • Amos - prophesied to Jeroboam II • Hosea - prophesied to Jeroboam II • Fall of Israel occurred in 722 BC * • 16 of the 20 Kings of Judah Non-Conical Prophets • The following Non-Canonical Prophets prophesied to Judah: Shemaiah – to Rehoboam – not to attack Israel Canonical prophets oriented toward Judah and Assyria • Isaiah – prophesied to Jotham, Ahaz, and Hezekiah • Micah – prophesied to Jotham, Ahaz, and Hezekiah • Nahum – prophesied to the King of Assyria • Zephaniah – prophesied to Josiah • Jeremiah – prophesied to Josiah • Fall of Judah 586 BC * The Book of the Prophet Isaiah Isaiah - 740-680 BC Pre Ex • Was
    [Show full text]
  • “The Reversal” Esther 8-9 We Are Finishing Our Series in Esther Today
    “The Reversal” Esther 8-9 We are finishing our series in Esther today. What an incredible book. The drama last week was rich wasn’t it? Today we are going to see the finish to the story. And it is going to be marked by the idea of REVERSAL. Really the whole book is marked by it isn’t it? I was torn between a couple of themes in this book so we just titled the series ESTHER so that when you search our sermon archives it’s easy to find. But one big theme is reversal. And the power in Esther is showing you how your life can reverse course. We saw it last week in individuals • Haman was trying to build his own life…he was trying to gain as much power and authority and accolade as he could. He was feeding that shadow monster called pride that lurks in every heart. And what happened? Pride lifted up really high…only to bring him down to his death. Reversal. He went up by himself only to be brought low by God. • Esther and Mordecai had a different story. They went low. They sacrificed themselves. Were ready to lose their lives for the sake of rescuing God’s people. And what happened? God lifted them up. He reversed their course. He exalted the ones who humbled themselves. Reversal. I think the greatest hope of Esther is in these last few chapters as it celebrates that God can rescue anyone. No one is too far gone for God to come in, grab hold of your life, and reverse course.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LXX TRANSLATION of ESTHER a Paraphrastic Translation of MT Or a Free Translation of a Rewritten Version?
    THE LXX TRANSLATION OF ESTHER A Paraphrastic Translation of MT or a Free Translation of a Rewritten Version? Emanuel Tov It can be said that the Septuagint version of Esther (Esth-LXX) has been the stepchild of LXX research over the past half century. While several monographs, some of them book-length, have been devoted to the ‘other’ Greek version, invariably named ‘Lucianic’,1 ‘A’, ‘alpha’ Text, or AT,2 little attention has been paid to the main Greek version. To the best of my knowledge, the text-critical value of this translation has not been studied in depth.3 The present paper is limited to brief 1 This version is contained in manuscripts that in other books contain the ‘Lucianic’ revision, but has little to do with that tradition, see R. Hanhart, Esther, Septuaginta, Vetus Testamentum graecum etc., VIII, 3, Göttingen 19832, 87–95. 2 In chronological sequence: C.A. Moore, ‘A Greek Witness to a Different Hebrew Text of Esther’, ZAW 79 (1967), 351–8; H.J. Cook, ‘The A Text of the Greek Versions of the Book of Esther’, ZAW 81 (1969), 369–76; E. Tov, ‘The ‘Lucianic’ Text of the Canonical and the Apocryphal Sections of Esther: A Rewritten Biblical Book’, Textus 10 (1982), 1–25, Revised version: The Greek and Hebrew Bible—Collected Essays on the Septuagint (VTSup 72), Leiden/etc. 1999, 535–48; D.J.A. Clines, The Esther Scroll—The Story of the Story ( JSOTSup 30), Sheffi eld 1984; J.-C. Haelewyck, ‘Le texte dit ‘Lucianique’ du livre d’Esther: Son étendue et sa coherence’, Le Muséon 98 (1985), 53–95; M.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Jesus' Geneaology
    There is reasonable confusion over the separate recorded genealogies of Jesus found in Matthew and Luke. And there are real debates as to the definitive answer. However, I have studied and I am thoroughly convinced both by the facts and the resulting power and clarity of the conclusion that Mathew follows the legal line of Jesus through his adopted father Joseph and Luke follows the bloodline of his mother Mary right back to Adam and Eve. Not only does this fit the text and its strange introduction of Joseph in Luke, but also: 1. Perfectly fits Luke’s agenda, focus on Mary and context 2. Fits the cultural expectation of a precise Greek genealogy not including any women 3. Allows Matthew’s clearly edited genealogy in three segments of exactly 14 to be exactly what it is – a normative Hebrew genealogy focused on key individuals including women 4. Avoids the curse on Jeconiah 5. And fulfills the legal and bloodline promises of the Messiah! For those who are interested I have included good scholarship below in increasing levels of detail. I know that you will find scholars who disagree with this assessment. This position is on very footing and provides a much more satisfactory and I would say obvious answer to the genealogy of our savior. ---------------- Simply said, “The genealogy in Matthew 1:1–17 is that of Joseph, the foster father of Jesus, and traces his legal right to the throne of David. Luke gives us the genealogy of Mary, which proves Jesus’ natural rights to the throne. Heli (Eli) was thus Mary’s father.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on 2 Kings 202 1 Edition Dr
    Notes on 2 Kings 202 1 Edition Dr. Thomas L. Constable Second Kings continues the narrative begun in 1 Kings. It opens with the translation of godly Elijah to heaven and closes with the transportation of the ungodly Jews to Babylon. For discussion of title, writer, date, scope, purpose, genre, style, and theology of 2 Kings, see the introductory section in my notes on 1 Kings. OUTLINE (Continued from notes on 1 Kings) 3. Ahaziah's evil reign in Israel 1 Kings 22:51—2 Kings 1:18 (continued) 4. Jehoram's evil reign in Israel 2:1—8:15 5. Jehoram's evil reign in Judah 8:16-24 6. Ahaziah's evil reign in Judah 8:25—9:29 C. The second period of antagonism 9:30—17:41 1. Jehu's evil reign in Israel 9:30—10:36 2. Athaliah's evil reign in Judah 11:1-20 3. Jehoash's good reign in Judah 11:21—12:21 4. Jehoahaz's evil reign in Israel 13:1-9 5. Jehoash's evil reign in Israel 13:10-25 6. Amaziah's good reign in Judah 14:1-22 7. Jeroboam II's evil reign in Israel 14:23-29 8. Azariah's good reign in Judah 15:1-7 9. Zechariah's evil reign in Israel 15:8-12 10. Shallum's evil reign in Israel 15:13-16 11. Menahem's evil reign in Israel 15:17-22 12. Pekahiah's evil reign in Israel 15:23-26 13. Pekah's evil reign in Israel 15:27-31 Copyright Ó 2021 by Thomas L.
    [Show full text]
  • Through the Bible Study 2 Chronicles 33-36
    THROUGH THE BIBLE STUDY 2 CHRONICLES 33-36 The name “Manasseh” means “one who causes to forget” – and this was the evil king’s legacy… His idolatry caused the people of Judah to forget their God. The period from Solomon to Manasseh covered 234 years. Manasseh was the 14th ruler of the divided kingdom of Judah. Six more kings and 57 years will come after him. Manasseh was the beginning of the end for the southern kingdom. When the Babylonians conquered Judah – the nation is judged, Jerusalem is sacked, the Temple is destroyed – God provides His people an explanation… In Jeremiah 15:4 God says of the Jews, “I will hand them over to trouble, to all kingdoms of the earth, because of Manasseh the son of Hezekiah, king of Judah, for what he did in Jerusalem.” God identified Manasseh as the painful cause. Of Judah’s 20 kings – all but 8 were evil – and none were more so than Manasseh. Verse 1, “Manasseh was 12 years old when he became king, and he reigned 55 years in Jerusalem.” No king was as wicked as Manasseh – and sadly, no king reigned longer. He ruled Judah from 697-643 – 5½ decades of depravity. CH Surgeon said of Manasseh, “David’s blood was in his veins, but David’s ways were not in his heart. He was a wild, degenerate shoot of a noble vine.” "1 Verse 2 “He did evil in the sight of the LORD, according to the abominations of the nations whom the LORD had cast out before the children of Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • The Book of Esther Lesson 5 Reverend Erwin Kurth Esther 5 & 6
    The Book of Esther Lesson 5 REVEREND ERWIN KURTH ESTHER 5 & 6 HAMAN ACTS LIKE A MANIC-DEPRESSive – ESTHER 5:9-14 26 THE KING HONORS MOrdecai – ESTHER 6:1-11 26 “It’S an Omen!” SAY Haman’S FAMILY AND FRIENDS – ESTHER 6:12-14 27 PERSONAL APPLICATIOn – ESTHER 7 & 8 28 ESTHER HAS INITIAL SUCCESS – ESTHER 5:1-8 After the three-day fast imposed upon herself and her maids was over, Esther put on her royal apparel and went into the inner court of the palace where Xerxes could readily see her from his royal throne. The king was enthralled by her beauty and captivating appearance. She seemed a vision of delight and joy forever. He graciously extended to her the gold scepter that was in his hand. Immediately recognizing that as a gesture of welcome, she approached the throne and touched the tip of the scepter, possibly with her lips, in acknowledgment of his favor and as a tender of her esteem and love. So the first step in delivering the Jews from destruction had been taken with success and aplomb. She had gained audience with the king (5:1-2). “What is on your mind, Queen Esther?” the king inquired. “Tell me and I’ll grant your request even if it costs me half of my kingdom.” (A hyperbolic promise current then and, in fact, some 500 years later too, when King Herod said to Salome, the exotic dancer, “Whatever you ask, I will give you, up to half my kingdom” Mark 6:23). Esther was prudent enough not to venture forward on the basis of a first impression.
    [Show full text]
  • The Divine Behind the Scenes, “The Divine Savior” Esther 8-10, 3/25/18
    1 Esther: The Divine Behind the Scenes, “The Divine Savior” Esther 8-10, 3/25/18 One of the most famous American photos, is this one taken of a sailor embracing in celebration with a nurse on the streets of Time Square. This spontaneous celebration broke out all over the country on August 15, 1945, V-J Day, when news came that Japan surrender and World War II was officially over. Today we are going to see another spontaneous celebration break out as we close our series in Esther. And if we could have snapped a photo in the streets of Susa, Persia in 5th century B.C., on Adar 13th (March 1st) we would have likely seen something very similar. But what became a day of great celebration for the Jewish people, begun as a day of great dread. Because it was that very same day that the Jewish people were marked for annihilation. The enemies of the Jewish people in the kingdom would have been sharpening their blades and looking forward to that same day, Adar 13. Why? Remember, there is an irrevocable genocide bill that was passed by King Xerxes under the influence of Haman the Agagite, legalizing and emboldening any Persian citizen throughout the vast empire who wanted the Jewish people eliminated to kill them and loot their possessions. But as the date drew nearer there was a sudden reversal of fortunes. While it appeared that Haman that Agagite with the King’s blessing had all the power, instead in a sudden twist, Haman is executed and the King’s favor is shifted to Esther and Mordecai.
    [Show full text]