DOCSLIB.ORG

Pacific Division Eighty-Ninth Annual Meeting Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pacific Division Eighty-Ninth Annual Meeting Program The American Philosophical Association PACIFIC DIVISION EIGHTY-NINTH ANNUAL MEETING PROGRAM WESTIN BAYSHORE VANCOUVER VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA APRIL 1 – 4, 2015 new for spring COMPLICATED PRESENCE THE PHILOSOPHER-LOBBYIST Heidegger and the John Dewey and the People’s Postmetaphysical Unity of Being Lobby, 1928–1940 Jussi Backman Mordecai Lee AVAILABLE JUNE THE ORIGIN OF TIME TOWARDS A RELATIONAL Heidegger and Bergson ONTOLOGY Heath Massey Philosophy’s Other Possibility AVAILABLE APRIL Andrew Benjamin AVAILABLE JUNE WHOSE TRADITION? WHICH DAO? SPARKS WILL FLY Confucius and Wittgenstein Benjamin and Heidegger on Moral Learning and Reflection Andrew Benjamin and James F. Peterman Dimitris Vardoulakis, editors AVAILABLE APRIL Klee’s MIRROR John Sallis LEO STRAUSS ON THE BORDERS OF JUDAISM, NATURALIZING HEIDEGGER PHILOSOPHY, AND HISTORY His Confrontation with Nietzsche, Jeffrey A. Bernstein His Contributions to AVAILABLE JUNE Environmental Philosophy David E. Storey THE SOPHISTS IN PLATo’s DIALOGUES THE POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY David D. Corey OF FRANCIS BACON AVAILABLE JUNE On the Unity of Knowledge Tom van Malssen PHANTOMS OF THE OTHER Four Generations of WONDER Derrida’s Geschlecht A Grammar David Farrell Krell Sophia Vasalou AVAILABLE MAY IMPORTANT NOTICES FOR MEETING ATTENDEES SESSION LOCATIONS Please note: the locations of all individual sessions are included in this paper program. Unlike in recent years, no separate brochure of session locations will be provided. To save on printing and shipping costs, the meeting program has not been mailed to members in advance. An online version of the meeting program is available on the APA website, but the online version does not include session locations. In addition, the full meeting schedule, including session locations, is contained in our new meeting app. For more information about the app and how to get it, see page 143. IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT REGISTRATION Those who have not registered for the meeting in advance may register directly at the registration desk, or may register online and check in at the registration desk to pick up their badges. Meeting attendees must wear their name badges at all times during sessions and receptions, and those not doing so may be asked to show proof of registration. Any attendee who is unable to show proof of registration will be instructed to register immediately or be shown out of the meeting. Registration fees provide the major source of support for every divisional meeting. Without that income, the APA is unable to host meetings and provide quality services and resources to members. Thank you for your support and cooperation. Please note: there is a $5 charge for replacement name badges and meeting programs. 1 Special Events ANNUAL BUSINESS MEETING Thursday, April 2, noon–1:00 p.m., Coquitlam (Second Floor) ANNUAL RECEPTION Thursday, April 2, 10:00 p.m.–midnight, Bayshore Ballroom Foyer (Lobby Level) Only registrants are entitled to attend the reception on April 2 at no additional charge. Non-registrants, such as spouses, partners, or family members of meeting attendees, who wish to accompany a registrant to this reception must purchase a $10 guest ticket; guest tickets are available at the reception door. POSTER PRESENTATIONS Friday, April 3, 11:00 a.m.–2:00 p.m., Bayshore Grand Ballroom, Salons D, E, and F (Lobby Level) CODE OF ETHICS TASK FORCE INPUT SESSION Friday, April 3, noon–1:00 p.m., Seymour (Lobby Level) PRIZE RECEPTION Friday, April 3, 2:00–3:00 p.m., Bayshore Grand Ballroom, Salons D, E, and F (Lobby Level) DEWEY LECTURE RECEPTION Friday, April 3, 5:30–6:00 p.m., Bayshore Ballroom Foyer (Lobby Level) PRESIDENTIAL RECEPTION Friday, April 3, 7:00–8:00 p.m., Bayshore Ballroom Foyer (Lobby Level) DIVERSITY INSTITUTE NETWORKING RECEPTION Saturday, April 4, 1:30–3:00 p.m. Marine Room (Lobby Level) 2 Wednesday Morning, April 1: 9:00 a.m.–noon WEDNESDAY, APRIL 1 REGISTRATION 8:30 a.m.–4:30 p.m., Coat Check Foyer 1 (Lobby Level) PLACEMENT SERVICE Information: 8:30 a.m.–4:30 p.m., Coat Check Foyer 1 (Lobby Level) Interview tables: Chairman (Tower Meeting Rooms) WEDNESDAY MORNING, 9:00 A.M.–NOON MAIN PROGRAM SESSIONS 1A Book Symposium: Shaun Nichols, Bound Bayshore Grand Ballroom, Salon A (Lobby Level) Chair: Garrett Pendergraft (Pepperdine University) Speakers: Robert Kane (University of Texas at Austin) Kelly McCormick (Texas Christian University) Manuel Vargas (University of San Francisco) Shaun Nichols (University of Arizona) 1B Book Symposium: Christopher Hill, Meaning, Mind, and Knowledge Bayshore Grand Ballroom, Salon B (Lobby Level) Chair: Tomás Bogardus (Pepperdine University) Speakers: Alex Byrne (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) Vann McGee (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) Brian McLaughlin (Rutgers University) Christopher Hill (Brown University) 1C Book Symposium: Neera Badhwar, Well-Being: Happiness in a Worthwhile Life Stanley Park Ballroom, Salon 1 (Second Floor) Chair: Claudia Leeb (Washington State University) Speakers: Dan Haybron (Saint Louis University) Nancy E. Snow (Marquette University) Valerie Tiberius (University of Minnesota) Neera Badhwar (University of Oklahoma and George Mason University) 3 Wednesday Morning, April 1: 9:00 a.m.–noon (cont.) 1D Invited Symposium: Eugenics and Philosophy Stanley Park Ballroom, Salon 2 (Second Floor) Chair: Robert A. Wilson (University of Alberta) Speakers: Leslie Pickering Francis (University of Utah) “Bioethics and Eugenics” Matt Haber (University of Utah) “Normal Variation, Normal, and Variation” Adam Cureton (University of Tennessee) “Parents with Disabilities” 1E Invited Symposium: Kant on Ideas Stanley Park Ballroom, Salon 3 (Second Floor) Chair: Yoon Choi (Marquette University) Speakers: Andrew Chignell (Cornell University) “Ideas, Discipline, and Hope in the Doctrine of Method” Angela Breitenbach (University of Cambridge) “Representing Ideas in Science and Art” Pierre Keller (University of California, Riverside) “Transforming Metaphysics into a Science: Kant’s Experimental Method and the Idea of a Cosmopolitan Philosophy” 1F Invited Symposium: Love and Relationships Bayshore Grand Ballroom, Salon C (Lobby Level) Chair: Aida Roige Mas (University of British Columbia) Speakers: Maren Behrensen (Linköpings Universitet) “‘Paradise by the Dashboard Light’: Romantic and Patriotic Ideologies” Patricia Marino (University of Waterloo) “Love and Economics: The Problem of Altruistic Preferences” Justin Leonard Clardy (University of Arkansas) “Love, Obligation, and Contracts” 1G Colloquium: Descartes and Malebranche Seymour (Lobby Level) 9:00-10:00 a.m. Chair: Kristopher Phillips (Southern Utah University) Speaker: Julie Walsh (Université du Québec, Montréal) “Love Thy Neighbor: Malebranche on Social Responsibility” Commentator: Walter Ott (University of Virginia) 4 Wednesday Morning, April 1: 9:00 a.m.–noon (cont.) 10:00-11:00 a.m. Chair: Kristin Primus (New York University) Speaker: Andrew Platt (Stony Brook University) “Free Agents and the ‘Realm of Nature’ in Descartes’s Physics” Commentator: Susan Mills (Grant MacEwan University) 11:00 a.m.-noon Chair: Boris Hennig (Ryerson University) Speaker: Daniel Collette (University of South Florida) “Passions Embodied: Descartes’s Ethics in the Letters to Elizabeth Revisited” Commentator: Matthew J. Kisner (University of South Carolina) 1H Colloquium: Emotion and Empathy Cypress Room 1 (Second Floor) 9:00-10:00 a.m. Chair: Stephen Scholz (St. Augustine’s College North Carolina) Speaker: Jeffrey Seidman (Vassar College) “The Unity of Caring and the Rationality of Emotion” Commentator: Julie Tannenbaum (Pomona College) 10:00-11:00 a.m. Chair: Daniel Haas (Red Deer College) Speaker: Daniel Shargel (Lawrence Technological University) “Emotions Without Objects” Commentator: Jason D’Cruz (University at Albany) 11:00 a.m.-noon Chair: Michael Milona (University of Southern California) Speaker: Jonathan Vanderhoek (University of Texas at Austin) “The Necessity of Empathy” Commentator: Eva-Maria Engelen (Universität Konstanz) 1I Colloquium: Locke, Berkeley, and Hume Oak Room 1 (Second Floor) 9:00-10:00 a.m. Chair: Michael Goodman (Humboldt State University) Speaker: Anna Vaughn (University of Utah) “Perception, Judgment, and Locke’s Answer to Molyneux’s Question: A Critical Response to Bolton” Commentator: William Edward Morris (Illinois Wesleyan University) 5 Wednesday Morning, April 1: 9:00 a.m.–noon (cont.) 10:00-11:00 a.m. Chair: Rebecca Copenhaver (Lewis & Clark College) Speaker: David Hilbert (University of Illinois at Chicago) “Central Banking and the Divine Language: Visual Signs and Paper Currency in Berkeley’s Economic Theory” Commentator: Brian Glenney (Gordon College) 11:00 a.m.-noon Chair: Paul Russell (University of Gothenburg and University of British Columbia) Speaker: Lisa Doerksen (University of Toronto) “The Role of the System of Double Existence in Hume’s Account of Identity” Commentator: Christina Chuang (Nanyang Technological University) 1J Colloquium: Logic and Modality Thompson (Lobby Level) 9:00-10:00 a.m. Chair: Gillman Payette (University of British Columbia) Speaker: Teresa Kouri (Ohio State University) “Restall’s Proof-theoretic and Model-theoretic Pluralisms” Commentator: Marcus Rossberg (University of Connecticut) 10:00-11:00 a.m. Chair: Ceth Lightfield (University of California, Davis) Speaker: Martin Glazier (New York University) “Explanation, Actualist Possibility, and Tomorrow’s Sea Battle” Commentator: Kris McDaniel (Syracuse University) 11:00 a.m.-noon Chair: Darin Dockstader (College of Southern
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ontology of Consciousness
    Ontology of Consciousness Percipient Action edited by Helmut Wautischer A Bradford Book The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England ( 2008 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or me- chanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. MIT Press books may be purchased at special quantity discounts for business or sales promotional use. For information, please e-mail [email protected] or write to Special Sales Depart- ment, The MIT Press, 55 Hayward Street, Cambridge, MA 02142. This book was set in Stone Serif and Stone Sans on 3B2 by Asco Typesetters, Hong Kong, and was printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Ontology of consciousness : percipient action / edited by Helmut Wautischer. p. cm. ‘‘A Bradford book.’’ Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-262-23259-3 (hardcover : alk. paper)—ISBN 978-0-262-73184-3 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Consciousness. 2. Philosophical anthropology. 3. Culture—Philosophy. 4. Neuropsychology— Philosophy. 5. Mind and body. I. Wautischer, Helmut. B105.C477O58 2008 126—dc22 2006033823 10987654321 Index Abaluya culture (Kenya), 519 as limitation of Turing machines, 362 Abba Macarius of Egypt, 166 as opportunity, 365, 371 Abhidharma in dualism, person as extension of matter, as guides to Buddhist thought and practice, 167, 454 10–13, 58 in focus of attention, 336 basic content, 58 in measurement of intervals, 315 in Asanga’s ‘‘Compendium of Abhidharma’’ in regrouping of elements, 335, 344 (Abhidharma-samuccaya), 67 in technical causality, 169, 177 in Maudgalyayana’s ‘‘On the Origin of shamanic separation from body, 145 Designations’’ Prajnapti–sastra,73 Action, 252–268.
    [Show full text]
  • 4​Th​ MINDING ANIMALS CONFERENCE CIUDAD DE
    th 4 ​ MINDING ANIMALS CONFERENCE ​ CIUDAD DE MÉXICO, 17 TO 24 JANUARY, 2018 SOCIAL PROGRAMME: ROYAL PEDREGAL HOTEL ACADEMIC PROGRAMME: NATIONAL AUTONOMOUS UNIVERSITY OF MEXICO Auditorio Alfonso Caso and Anexos de la Facultad de Derecho FINAL PROGRAMME (Online version linked to abstracts. Download PDF here) 1/47 All delegates please note: ​ 1. Presentation slots may have needed to be moved by the organisers, and may appear in a different place from that of the final printed programme. Please consult the schedule located in the Conference Programme upon arrival at the Conference for your presentation time. 2. Please note that presenters have to ensure the following times for presentation to allow for adequate time for questions from the floor and smooth transition of sessions. Delegates must not stray from their allocated 20 minutes. Further, delegates are welcome to move within sessions, therefore presenters MUST limit their talk to the allocated time. Therefore, Q&A will be AFTER each talk, and NOT at the end of the three presentations. Plenary and Invited Talks – 45 min. presentation and 15 min. discussion (Q&A). 3. For panels, each panellist must stick strictly to a 10 minute time frame, before discussion with the floor commences. 4. Note that co-authors may be presenting at the conference in place of, or with the main author. For all co-authors, delegates are advised to consult the Conference Abstracts link on the Minding Animals website. Use of the term et al is provided where there is more than two authors ​ ​ of an abstract. 5. Moderator notes will be available at all front desks in tutorial rooms, along with Time Sheets (5, 3 and 1 minute Left).
    [Show full text]
  • Ethics and Animals Fall 2020
    Ethics and Animals Fall 2020 Description This course examines the morality of our treatment of nonhuman animals. We start with a survey of moral theory. Do animals have moral status? Do we have a right to harm or kill some animals in order to benefit or save others? We consider these questions from a variety of moral perspectives, including consequentialism, Kantian ethics, virtue ethics, and feminist ethics. We then apply these ideas to different kinds of animal use. For example, what is the morality of our treatment of animals in food, research, captivity, and the wild? Finally, we will explore ethical questions that arise for animal activists, including about what ends they should pursue, what means they should take towards those ends, and how they should relate to other social movements. General Information Time: T 5:00{7:30 ET Place: online Instructor: Name: Jeff Sebo Email: jeff[email protected] Office: online Office Hours: M 3-5pm ET 1 Readings The required books for this class are: Julia Driver, Ethics: The Fundamentals; Lori Gruen, Ethics and Animals; and Gary Francione & Robert Garner, The Animal Rights Debate. These books are available online, and the Gruen and Francione & Garner books are also available for free at the NYU library website. All readings not from the required books will be posted on the course website. Grading Your grades will be determined as follows: • Papers (75%): You will write three papers explaining and evaluating the ideas and arguments discussed in class. You will email this paper to [email protected]. For each paper, you can either create your own prompt (provided that you clear it with us in advance) or select from prompts that we create.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy of Language
    Philosophy OF Language Julian J. Schlöder, University OF AmsterDAM YEREVAN Academy FOR Linguistics AND Philosophy 2019 1 = 99 William Lycan, (Routledge, 3rD ed, 2019). ◦ Philosophy OF Language ◦ Stephen Yablo, LecturE NOTES ON Philosophy OF Language. > https: //ocw.mit.edu/courses/linguistics-and-philosophy/ 24-251-introduction-to-philosophy-of-language-fall-2011/ lecture-notes/ Jeff Speaks, (StanforD Encyclopedia OF ◦ Theories OF Meaning Philosophy). > https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/meaning 2 = 99 Language IS . ◦ REMARKABLE 3 = 99 ArE Pringles POTATO chips? 4 = 99 ◦ The British COURTS SPEND SOME TWO YEARS ON THAT question. > At STAKE WAS SOME £100 MILLION IN TAXes. Yes! A Pringle IS “MADE FROM POTATO ◦ The VAT AND Duties Tribunal: flOUR IN THE SENSE THAT ONE CANNOT SAY THAT IT IS NOT MADE FROM POTATO flour.” No! Pringles CONTAIN “A NUMBER OF ◦ The High Court OF Justice: SIGNIfiCANT INGREDIENTS” AND “CANNOT BE SAID TO BE ‘MADE OF’ ONE OF them.” TheY DO NOT EXHIBIT “POTATONESS”. (TheY ARE MORE LIKE BREAD THAN LIKE chips.) : Yes! The TEST FOR “POTATONESS” IS AN ◦ The Court OF Appeal “Aristotelian QUESTION” ABOUT “ESSENCE” AND THE COURT HAS “NO REAL IDEA” OF WHAT THAT means. Rather, THE QUESTION “WOULD PROBABLY BE ANSWERED IN A MORE RELEVANT AND SENSIBLE WAY BY A CHILD CONSUMER THAN BY A FOOD SCIENTIST OR A CULINARY pendant.” 5 = 99 THE QUESTIONS ◦ Fact: WORDS AND SENTENCES HAVE MEANINGSOR ARE MEANINGFUL. ◦ Fact: NOT ALL SEQUENCES OF sounds/letters ARE meaningful. ◦ But WHAT ARE meanings? Alternatively: WHAT IS meaningfulness? ◦ HoW DO LINGUISTIC ITEMS RELATE TO meanings? (And WHY DO SOME ITEMS FAIL TO RELATE TO meanings?) ◦ IN WHAT RELATIONS DO humans, LANGUAGES AND MEANINGS stand? 6 = 99 MEANING FACTS HerE ARE SOME THINGS THAT WE KNOW ABOUT meanings, WHATEVER THEY ARe.
    [Show full text]
  • C 1992-219 a Nahuatl Interpretation of the Conquest
    In: Amaryll Chanady, Latin American Identity and Constructions of Difference, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Vol. 10, 1994, pp. 104-129. Chapter 6 A Nahuatl Interpretation of the Conquest: From the "Parousia" of the Gods to the "Invasion" Enrique Dussel (translated by Amaryll Chanady) In teteu inan in tetu ita, in Huehueteutl [Mother of the gods, Father of the gods, the Old God], lying on the navel of the Earth, enclosed in a refuge of turquoises. He who lives in the waters the color of a blue bird, he who is surrounded by clouds, the Old God, he who lives in the shadows of the realm of the dead, the lord of fire and time. -Song to Ometeótl, the originary being of the Aztec Tlamatinime1 I would like to examine the "meaning of 1492," which is nothing else but "the first experience of modem Europeans," from the perspective of the "world" of the Aztecs, as the conquest in the literal sense of the term started in Mexico. In some cases I will refer to other cultures in order to suggest additional interpreta- tions, although I am aware that these are only a few of the many possible examples, and that they are a mere "indication" of the problematic. Also, in the desire to continue an intercultural dia- logue initiated in Freiburg with Karl-Otto Apel in 1989, I will re- fer primarily to the existence of reflexive abstract thought on our continent.2 The tlamatini In nomadic societies (of the first level) or societies of rural plant- ers (like the Guaranis), social differentiation was not developed sufficiently to identify a function akin to that of the "philoso- pher", although in urban society this social figure acquires a dis- tinct profile.3 As we can read in Garcilaso de la Vega's Comenta- rios reales de los Incas: 104 105 Demás de adorar al Sol por dios visible, a quien ofrecieron sacrificios e hicieron grandes fiestas,..
    [Show full text]
  • European Journal of American Studies, 14-2 | 2019, “Summer 2019” [Online], Online Since 06 July 2019, Connection on 08 July 2021
    European journal of American studies 14-2 | 2019 Summer 2019 Electronic version URL: https://journals.openedition.org/ejas/14551 DOI: 10.4000/ejas.14551 ISSN: 1991-9336 Publisher European Association for American Studies Electronic reference European journal of American studies, 14-2 | 2019, “Summer 2019” [Online], Online since 06 July 2019, connection on 08 July 2021. URL: https://journals.openedition.org/ejas/14551; DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.4000/ejas.14551 This text was automatically generated on 8 July 2021. European Journal of American studies 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS “A More Permanent Familiarity”: Value and the Paternal Image on United States Currency Heinz Tschachler Papa’s Baby, Mama’s Maybe: Reading the Black Paternal Palimpsest and White Maternal Present Absence in Nella Larsen’s Quicksand Yolanda M. Manora “His cramped and claustrophobic brain”: Confinement and Freedom in John Wray’s Lowboy Pascale Antolin Remembering, History, and Identity: The Sculpted Life of Benjamin Franklin Mert Deniz Truth, Truth-telling and Gender in Politics: The ”Hillary” Experience C. Akça Ataç US Conservative and Libertarian Experts and Solar Geoengineering: An Assessment Jean-Daniel Collomb Close to Home, One at a Time, Not in My Backyard: Individualism and the Mantras of Depoliticization in US Reform Discourses Olga Thierbach-McLean The Conspiracist Strategy: Lessons from American Alternative Health Promotions Gad Yair Black Elitism and Cultural Entrepreneurship in 1920’s Boston, Massachusetts: The League of Women for Community Service Craig Doughty American Studies Against Itself Michael Barton European journal of American studies, 14-2 | 2019 2 “A More Permanent Familiarity”: Value and the Paternal Image on United States Currency Heinz Tschachler 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathias Risse Curriculum Vitae
    Mathias Risse Curriculum Vitae John F. Kennedy School of Government Office: (617) 495 9811 Harvard University Fax: (617) 495 4297 79 JFK St / Rubenstein 209 Cambridge, MA 02138 [email protected] USA https://www.hks.harvard.edu/about/faculty-staff-directory/mathias-risse Citizenship: German and American Employment Since 2018: Lucius N. Littauer Professor of Philosophy and Public Administration; Director of the Carr Center for Human Rights Policy; Affiliated Faculty in the Department of Philosophy 2000-2005: Assistant Professor, 2005 – 2010: Associate Professor, 2010-2018 Professor of Philosophy and Public Policy, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University 2000 - 2002: Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, Yale University Areas of Teaching and Research Areas of Specialization: Social and Political Philosophy, Ethics (Systematic, Applied) Areas of Competence: 19th Century German Philosophy, especially Nietzsche; Decision Theory (Individual and Group), Philosophy of Science (General); Logic Education 1995- 2000: Princeton University, Department of Philosophy Ph.D., Summer 2000; M.A., 1997 1990-1995: University of Bielefeld (Germany), Departments of Philosophy and Mathematics and Institute for Mathematical Economics M.S. (Diplom), 1996, Mathematics, supervisor Robert Aumann, Hebrew University; exam areas probability/measure theory, game theory, logic, algebraic topology; grade sehr gut (very good) B.S. (Vordiplom), 1992, Mathematics and Mathematical Economics, grade sehr gut B.A. (Zwischenprüfung),
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Women's Political Thought in Europe, 1400-1700
    This page intentionally left blank A HISTORY OF WOMEN’S POLITICAL THOUGHT IN EUROPE, 1400–1700 This ground-breaking book surveys the history of women’s political thought in Europe, from the late medieval period to the early modern era. The authors examine women’s ideas about topics such as the basis of political authority, the best form of political organisation, justifications of obedience and resistance, and concepts of liberty, toleration, sociability, equality, and self-preservation. Women’s ideas concerning relations between the sexes are discussed in tandem with their broader political outlooks; the authors demonstrate that the development of a distinctively sexual politics is reflected in women’s critiques of marriage, the double standard, and women’s exclusion from government. Women writers are also shown to be indebted to the ancient idea of political virtue, and to be acutely aware of being part of a long tradition of female political commentary. This work will be of tremendous interest to political philosophers, historians of ideas, and feminist scholars alike. jacqueline broad is an Honorary Research Associate in the School of Philosophy and Bioethics at Monash University. She is author of Women Philosophers of the Seventeenth Century (2002) and co-editor with Karen Green of Virtue, Liberty, and Toleration: Political Ideas of European Women, 1400–1800 (2007). karen green is Associate Professor in the School of Philosophy and Bioethics at Monash University. She is author of Dummett: Philosophy of Language (2001) and The Woman of Reason (1995). A HISTORY OF WOMEN’S POLITICAL THOUGHT IN EUROPE, 1400–1700 JACQUELINE BROAD AND KAREN GREEN Monash University CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521888172 © Jacqueline Broad and Karen Green 2009 This publication is in copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Jay Bernstein 167 Vi Contents
    The new aestheticism The new aestheticism edited by John J. Joughin and Simon Malpas Manchester University Press Manchester and New York distributed exclusively in the USA by Palgrave Copyright © Manchester University Press 2003 While copyright in the volume as a whole is vested in Manchester University Press, copyright in individual chapters belongs to their respective authors. This electronic version has been made freely available under a Creative Commons (CC-BY-NC- ND) licence, which permits non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction provided the author(s) and Manchester University Press are fully cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. Details of the licence can be viewed at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Published by Manchester University Press Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9NR, UK and Room 400, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010, USA www.manchesteruniversitypress.co.uk British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data applied for Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data applied for ISBN 0 7190 6138 5 hardback 0 7190 6139 3 paperback First published 2003 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 10987654321 Typeset in Adobe Garamond by Servis Filmsetting Ltd, Manchester Printed in Great Britain by Biddles Ltd, Guildford and King’s Lynn Contents List of contributors page vii The new aestheticism: an introduction John J. Joughin and Simon Malpas 1 Part I Positions 1Aesthetic education and the demise of experience Thomas Docherty 23 2Art in time of war: towards a contemporary aesthetic Jonathan Dollimore 36 3Mimesis in black and white: feminist aesthetics, negativity and semblance Ewa Plonowska Ziarek 51 4 What comes after art? Andrew Bowie 68 5Touching art: aesthetics, fragmentation and community Simon Malpas 83 Part II Readings 6 The Alexandrian aesthetic Howard Caygill 99 7Defending poetry, or, is there an early modern aesthetic? Mark Robson 119 8Shakespeare’s genius: Hamlet, adaptation and the work of following John J.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Modern Women Philosophers and the History of Philosophy
    Early Modern Women Philosophers and the History of Philosophy EILEEN O’NEILL It has now been more than a dozen years since the Eastern Division of the APA invited me to give an address on what was then a rather innovative topic: the published contributions of seventeenth- and eighteenth-century women to philosophy.1 In that address, I highlighted the work of some sixty early modern women. I then said to the audience, “Why have I presented this somewhat interesting, but nonetheless exhausting . overview of seventeenth- and eigh- teenth-century women philosophers? Quite simply, to overwhelm you with the presence of women in early modern philosophy. It is only in this way that the problem of women’s virtually complete absence in contemporary histories of philosophy becomes pressing, mind-boggling, possibly scandalous.” My presen- tation had attempted to indicate the quantity and scope of women’s published philosophical writing. It had also suggested that an acknowledgment of their contributions was evidenced by the representation of their work in the scholarly journals of the period and by the numerous editions and translations of their texts that continued to appear into the nineteenth century. But what about the status of these women in the histories of philosophy? Had they ever been well represented within the histories written before the twentieth century? In the second part of my address, I noted that in the seventeenth century Gilles Menages, Jean de La Forge, and Marguerite Buffet produced doxogra- phies of women philosophers, and that one of the most widely read histories of philosophy, that by Thomas Stanley, contained a discussion of twenty-four women philosophers of the ancient world.
    [Show full text]
  • Mexico and Spain on the Eve of Encounter
    4 Mexico and Spain on the Eve of Encounter In comparative history, the challenge is to identify significant factors and the ways in which they are related to observed outcomes. A willingness to draw on historical data from both sides of the Atlantic Ocean will be essen- tial in meeting this challenge. — Walter Scheidel (2016)1 uring the decade before Spain’s 1492 dynastic merger and launching of Dtrans- Atlantic expeditions, both the Aztec Triple Alliance and the joint kingdoms of Castile and Aragón were expanding their domains through con- quest. During the 1480s, the Aztec Empire gained its farthest flung province in the Soconusco region, located over 500 miles (800 km) from the Basin of Mexico near the current border between Mexico and Guatemala. It was brought into the imperial domain of the Triple Alliance by the Great Speaker Ahuitzotl, who ruled from Tenochtitlan, and his younger ally and son- in- law Nezahualpilli, of Texcoco. At the same time in Spain, the allied Catholic Monarchs Isabela of Castile and Ferdinand of Aragón were busy with military campaigns against the southern emirate of Granada, situated nearly the same distance from the Castilian heartland as was the Soconusco from the Aztec heartland. The unification of the kingdoms ruled by Isabela and Ferdinand was in some sense akin to the reunifi- cation of Hispania Ulterior and Hispania Citerior of the early Roman period.2 The conquest states of Aztec period Mexico and early modern Spain were the product of myriad, layered cultural and historical processes and exchanges. Both were, of course, ignorant of one another, but the preceding millennia of societal developments in Mesoamerica and Iberia set the stage for their momentous en- counter of the sixteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY PAUL SCOTT, University of Kansas
    THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY PAUL SCOTT, University of Kansas 1. GENERAL Orientalism and discussions of identity and alterity form part of an identifiable trend in our field during the coverage of the two calendar years. Another strong current is the concept of libertinage and its literary and social influence. In terms of the first direction, Nicholas Dew, Orientalism in Louis XlV's France, OUP, 2009, xv+301 pp., publishes an overview of what he terms 'baroque Orientalism' and explores the topos through chapters devoted to the production of texts by d'Herbelot, Bernier, and Thevenot which would have an important reception and influence during the 18th century. The network of the Republic of Letters was crucial in gaining access to and studying oriental works and, while this was a marginal presence during the period, D. reveals how the curiosity of vth-c. scholars would lay the foundations of work that would be drawn on by the philosophes. Duprat, Orient, is an apt complement to Dew's volume, and A. Duprat, 'Le fil et la trame. Motifs orientaux dans les litteratures d'Europe' (9-17) maintains that the depiction of the Orient in European lit. was a common attempt to express certain desires but, at the same time, to contain a general angst as a result of incorporating scientific progress and territorial expansion. Brian Brazeau, Writing a New France, 1604-1632: Empire and Early Modern French Identity, Farnham, Ashgate, 2009, x +132 pp., selects the period following the end of the Wars of Religion because this early period of colonization gave rise to some of the most enthusiastic accounts as well as the fact that they established the pioneering debate for future narratives.
    [Show full text]